Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Committee Meeting
Regular MeetingMonterey, CA · March 27, 2014
Minutes
MINUTES
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COMMITTEE
Project Review Meeting
Aguajito Oaks – New Monterey
Thursday, March 27, 2014
7:00 PM
COUNCIL CHAMBER, FEW MEMORIAL HALL
580 PACIFIC STREET
MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
NIP Representatives & Alta Mesa NIP Rep Heuer
Alternates Present: Casanova-Oak Knoll NIP Rep Ruccello
Casanova Oak-Knoll NIP Alt Brassfield
Deer Flats NIP Rep Pollacci
Del Monte Beach NIP Rep Fields
Del Monte Grove-Laguna Grande NIP Rep Alley
Del Monte Grove-Laguna Grande NIP Alt Baker
Fisherman Flats NIP Rep Smith
Monterey Vista NIP Alt Venza as Rep
Monterey Vista NIP Alt Simons
New Monterey NIP Rep Dwight
New Monterey NIP Alt Hayter
Oak Grove NIP Alt Green
Old Town NIP Rep Harrison
Old Town NIP Alt Ricketson
Villa Del Monte NIP Rep Mucha
Staff Members Present: NIP Staff Coordinator Reeves, Recording Secretary Allen,
Parks Operations Manager Marcuzzo, Capital Programs
Coordinator Francis
CALL TO ORDER
NIP Staff Coordinator Reeves called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Eleven neighborhoods were represented, with Aguajito Oaks, Skyline Forest, and Skyline Ridge
unrepresented.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. January 23, 2014 (Continued from February 27, 2014 meeting)
Sharon Dwight made a motion to approve the January 23, 2014 minutes as revised.
Rick Heuer seconded the motion. The motion was approved by nine
Representatives, with Aguajito Oaks, Deer Flats, Del Monte Beach, Skyline Forest,
and Skyline Ridge absent.
2. February 27, 2014
Sharon Dwight made a motion to approve the February 27, 2014 minutes as
submitted. Rick Heuer seconded the motion. The motion was approved by nine
Representatives, with Aguajito Oaks, Deer Flats, Del Monte Beach, Skyline Forest,
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Thursday, March 27, 2014
and Skyline Ridge absent.
Deer Flats Representative Mark Pollacci and Del Monte Beach Representative Jayme
Fields arrived at 7:02 p.m.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Reeves opened the floor for Public Comments on items not on the agenda. Having
no requests to speak, Mr. Reeves closed Public Comments.
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
3. Purpose of Meeting
Mr. Reeves said the primary purpose of the meetings tonight and next week are for
reviewing the project proposals and cost estimates; and for the Committee to raise
questions and receive clarification on the projects and their scope. He said the time to
advocate for projects would be the following two meetings.
4. Van Tour Projects Due to Tom Reeves, Engineering Office
Mr. Reeves asked the Committee to submit the projects they wanted to view on the van
tour. He said attendance is not mandatory, but it is not televised so there is no way to
learn about the projects on the van tour without attending. Ms. Dwight strongly
recommended that the Committee attend the field trip.
5. March 18, 2014 City Council Comments on Proposed FY 2014/15 NIP Projects
Mr. Reeves advised that Council gave no feedback on the Homeless Campground Study
or the driveway reconstruction projects. He deferred to Alternate Spokesperson Dwight
who attended the meeting to continue under NIP Informational Reports.
NIP INFORMATIONAL REPORTS
6. NIP Spokesperson Reports
Alternate Spokesperson Dwight said that Councilmembers Downey and Sollecito
supported the greenbelt fuel reduction projects, Councilmember Haffa supported
preserving historic assets, and Councilmember Selfridge supported the Council Chamber
pew upgrade project. She said that she brought up the driveway reconstruction projects
and the street sweeping signage, but Council gave no additional guidance on the
projects.
Ms. Dwight said she attended the March 20, 2014 Parks and Recreation (PRC)
Commission meeting and that the PRC unanimously advised that CW-30 Homeless
Campground Study did not meet the Parks Master Plan because it states that the only
campground allowed in city parks is in Veteran’s Memorial Park. She said some of the
Commissioners endorsed a study to find a solution for the homeless population.
Spokesperson Heuer said he attended the March 10, 2014 Mayor’s Meeting and
discussed the need for a dedicated NIP Program Manager, which seemed to be gaining
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Thursday, March 27, 2014
2
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Thursday, March 27, 2014
some traction. He advised that the NIP Spokespersons are meeting with staff on Friday,
March 28 and with the NIP City Council Subcommittee meeting on Monday, March 31
where the topic would be discussed further.
Alternate Spokesperson Ruccello advised that Senator Farr wants to put together a
presentation for Congress about the NIP because the process is democracy from the
bottom up. Mr. Ruccello said that Senator Farr wants to explain the NIP process, how
the program functions, what it accomplishes, and how the Representatives follow through
from submittal of projects to the completion of approved projects.
PUBLIC APPEARANCE
7. Recommend City Council Approve Appropriation and Transfer of Funds for Additional
Funding for Eddie Burns Lane Drainage Improvements Project (30n1013) Continued
from February 27, 2014 meeting
Mr. Reeves confirmed that the project scope had not changed, and that the bid was for
the correct portion of Eddie Burns Lane. Mr. Reeves opened Public Comments.
Maryanne Finocchi, Old Town resident, asked that the Committee approve the request
so that the project can finally be completed. Having no further requests to speak, Mr.
Reeves closed Public Comments.
Richard Ruccello made a motion to recommend to Council to approve additional
funding from the NIP Contingency Fund for the Eddie Burns Lane Drainage
Improvements Project (30n1013) in the amount of $26,000. Mark Pollacci seconded
the motion. The motion was approved by eleven Representatives, with Aguajito
Oaks, Skyline Forest, and Skyline Ridge absent.
8. NIP Project Cost Subcommittee Recommendation for FY2014/15 Contingency Fund
Jayme Fields reported that the NIP Project Cost Subcommittee met and studied the
Eddie Burns Drainage Improvements project as an example to identify the reasons for
the increased costs. She advised that the increases were caused by the following
factors. 1) Picking up and setting down a project over a prolonged period of time
resulted in staff inefficiencies, 2) lack of supervision that allowed staff to go off focus, 3)
poor consultant performance, including dragging out a project over an extended period of
time even when encouraged not to do so, 4) increased construction cost caused by the
long delay in project implementation, and 5) increased costs for environmental studies
that were not factored into the past generic estimates. She advised that the
Subcommittee would meet in May to review a sample of actual project results.
Ms. Fields advised that the subcommittee also reviewed the current list of open projects
and was advised by Capital Projects staff that approximately 36 of the open projects
might require additional funding to complete. The Subcommittee determined that seven
of those were phased projects, which left 29 projects that would potentially require
additional funding. Ms. Fields advised the Subcommittee made the following two
recommendations:
1) The NIP Committee should approve a total contingency pool of $750,000 to cover
this year’s approved projects and the previously funded projects slated for
completion in the next year.
2) All previously approved and over-budget projects would be brought back to the
NIP Committee by staff in batches for specific evaluation and approval of the
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Thursday, March 27, 2014
3
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Thursday, March 27, 2014
contingency amounts, and that the Committee would not be giving a blanket
approval of the overrun amounts. The Subcommittee’s recommendation included
scheduling a minimum of quarterly meetings to facilitate this approval process
and take care of on-going NIP business.
The Committee discussed and concurred with the recommendations. Ms. Dwight
clarified that the existing contingency balance would be deducted from the $750,000, so
only the difference would need to be approved for the coming year. Pat Venza proposed
monthly meetings, and Mr. Heuer confirmed that a quarterly meeting would work, but that
a Special Meeting could be called when necessary.
Mr. Reeves opened Public Comments. Having no requests to speak, Mr. Reeves closed
Public Comments.
9. Project Review (Aguajito Oaks – New Monterey)
Mr. Reeves and the Committee reviewed the projects and videos from Aguajito Oaks
through New Monterey with the following concerns and determinations:
Alta Mesa
AM-1 Don Dahvee Greenbelt Fuel Reduction – Mr. Heuer asked why the city is
using Topes Tree Service instead of California Conservation Corp. Park
Operations Manager Marcuzzo advised that the city still utilizes Cal Fire
Conservation Corp for brush clearing but are not allowed to use them for work
felling trees.
AM-3 Via Mirada Sidewalk – Ms. Dwight asked how much vegetation would be
removed.
Mr. Reeves opened Public Comments for Alta Mesa neighborhood. Regarding AM-2 Iris
Cyn Creek Restoration Ph 1, Mike Brassfield asked if this was a civil engineering project,
what the goal was, and what the level was for restoration. Mr. Reeves confirmed that it is
a restoration project to create capacity for flows from future upstream phases, not civil
engineering. Having no further requests to speak, Mr. Reeves closed Public Comments
for this neighborhood.
Casanova Oak Knoll
COK-2 CONA Park Center Photo Surveillance – Mr. Reeves advised that the
Information Services Department has to review the estimate because they will
be maintaining the equipment.
COK-3 N. Fremont Street Widening / Beautification Study – Mr. Ruccello advised that
the project was for a study with a revised not to exceed estimate of $5,000
and requested that the project be on the van tour.
Mr. Reeves opened Public Comments for Casanova Oak Knoll neighborhood. Having no
requests to speak, Mr. Reeves closed Public Comments for this neighborhood.
Casanova Oak Knoll Representative Richard Ruccello left at 8:12 p.m. and Alternate
Mike Brassfield replaced him.
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Thursday, March 27, 2014
4
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Thursday, March 27, 2014
Deer Flats
DF-1 Caribou Ct (7) Sidewalk Improvement – Mr. Pollacci advised the
neighborhood would apply all of their base allocation to this project.
Mr. Reeves opened Public Comments for Deer Flats neighborhood. Having no requests
to speak, Mr. Reeves closed Public Comments for this neighborhood.
Del Monte Beach
DMB-4 DMB Street Sweep Schedule Signage – Ms. Fields advised there is no
support for this project but it should remain on the project list.
DMB-6 Roberts Av Fence – Ms. Fields confirmed that the project is to replace fencing
on the entry and exit sides of Roberts Avenue.
Mr. Reeves opened Public Comments for Del Monte Beach neighborhood. Having no
requests to speak, Mr. Reeves closed Public Comments for this neighborhood.
Del Monte Grove – Laguna Grande
DMG-1 Virgin/Montecito Ped Access Improvements – Mr. Reeves advised that this
project could not be constructed without approval of DMG-2 LG Park Exit ADA
Access/Parking Lot Improvements.
DMG-2 LG Park Exit ADA Access/Parking Lot Improvements – Mr. Marcuzzo
confirmed that this area belongs to the city and is viewed as a city park.
Mr. Reeves opened Public Comments for Del Monte Grove-Laguna Grande
neighborhood. Having no requests to speak, Mr. Reeves closed Public Comments for
this neighborhood.
Ms. Alley asked that both projects be added to the van tour.
Downtown
DT-1 Safe Place Bike Rack Installation – Mr. Reeves said that there probably is not
enough room for a bike rack in the public right-of-way. Ms. Dwight asked staff
to check if there is a bike rack left over from a previous project that could be
used for this project.
DT-3 Hartnell Gulch Park Ph 1 – Mr. Heuer questioned that there were plans
already in existence for this area and Mr. Reeves advised that the existing
plan might need to be amended if the existing scope of this project went
forward. The Committee strongly recommended that the project be rescoped
and limited to something that could be done that was not in conflict with the
existing plans.
DT-4 Franklin/Washington Traffic Signal Upgrade – Mr. Reeves verified that the
signal could not be installed without the drainage improvements.
Mr. Reeves opened Public Comments for the Downtown neighborhood. Abigail Kehr,
speaking for DT-3 Hartnell Gulch Park Ph 1 applicant Megan Tolbert, said the plan for
the Library expansion of the parking lot was new information, but there would still be
room for a community-based project to improve the area and do some stream restoration
and clean out the ivy and black berry bushes. Mr. Heuer suggested that the applicant
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Thursday, March 27, 2014
5
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Thursday, March 27, 2014
examine the existing Library plans and rescope the project to build something. Ms.
Dwight recommended that the rescoped project be limited only to restoration and
perhaps a path around the back, and Mr. Marcuzzo concurred that limiting to Item #2 and
a path would be a good solution. Having no further requests to speak, Mr. Reeves
closed Public Comments for this neighborhood.
Fisherman Flats
FF-2 San Vito Cir/Via Isola/Park Lighting – Mr. Reeves advised that the lighting
request conforms to City policy. Hank Smith advised the residents were split
50/50 on supporting the project and that some wanted timers installed that
would shut off the lights at 9:00 p.m.
FF-3 Josselyn Cyn Rd Drainage – Mr. Reeves said that the Traffic Engineer
advised that a surface drainage gutter should not be used, so the scope and
estimate would need to be revised to a catch basin and pipe.
FF-4 Foothill School Olmsted Drop-off Property Purchase – Mr. Reeves confirmed
that the project was on private property, that there was a five-year license
agreement with the original property owner that was extended once, and has
now expired. He said the new property owner wanted a separate driveway
from the drop off or to have the drop off removed from his property. Ms.
Dwight said she did not remember that the drop off was built on private
property. Mr. Heuer said the project originally took a long time to implement
because it was on private property and in the county, but his concern was that
he did not know the agreement could expire. Mr. Reeves said to keep the
improvements on the private property some permanent solution should be
found, such as an easement or in-fee agreement to secure the property rights.
Mike Brassfield and Pat Venza suggested that MPUSD should participate in
providing funding for the project.
FF-5 Greenbelt Goat Fuel Reduction – Mr. Reeves advised that City code does not
allow horses, cows, or goats housed within city limits. Mr. Marcuzzo advised
that goats do not discriminate what they eat, and would eat plant species that
must be preserved within the city greenbelts.
FF-8 Foothill School Sports Field Improvements – Mr. Reeves confirmed the sports
field is within the city limits, and that the PTA is working to obtain the access
agreement from MPUSD.
Mr. Reeves opened Public Comments for Fisherman Flats neighborhood. Having no
requests to speak, Mr. Reeves closed Public Comments for this neighborhood.
Monterey Vista
MV-2 Via Gayuba (San Bernabe to Via Paraiso) Resurfacing – Mr. Reeves advised
that the estimate for the project was $160,000.
MV-4 Via Paraiso Park Hardscape Improvements – Pat Venza advised that the
neighborhood association thinks this project is a low priority because the
hardscape is not in bad shape.
MV-6 Doud/Martin Retaining Wall – Mr. Reeves advised that this project is on
private property, a wall is not warranted, and the erosion should be controlled
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Thursday, March 27, 2014
6
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Thursday, March 27, 2014
by plant life. Ms. Venza said the neighborhood association agreed with this
determination.
MV-7 Doud 900 Blk Repaving – Mr. Reeves advised that the estimate for the project
was $90,000.
MV-9 MV Street Resurfacing 2014 – Ms. Venza asked for a breakdown estimate of
each section so they could prioritize which to fund.
MV-10 Via Descanso Storm Drain – Mr. Reeves advised that the estimate for the
project was $35,000.
Jayme Field asked that MV-5 Via Del Rey/Herrmann Right Turn Lane Elimination be
added to the van tour.
Mr. Reeves opened Public Comments for Monterey Vista neighborhood. Phyllis Grillo
Weinbrenner, applicant for MV- 5 Via Del Rey/Herrmann Right Turn Lane Elimination,
said this was a dangerous corner for students at Monterey High, with many accidents
and near misses. She asked to close the turn lane and add a stop sign on the downhill
side. Having no further requests to speak, Mr. Reeves closed Public Comments for this
neighborhood.
New Monterey
NM-1 Irving 800 Blk Street Widening – Ms. Dwight advised that the scope may be
changed to widen only one side of the street.
NM-3 Laine 300 Blk Widening – Ms. Dwight said the project scope would be revised
from installing sidewalks to a street widening.
Deer Flats Representative Mark Pollacci left the meeting at 10:37 p.m.
NM-7 Belden 300 Widening – Ms. Dwight advised that two of the property owners
on the block do not want the project, but the rest of the block supports it.
NM-8 David Open Space – Ms. Dwight advised that the school district would be
happy to transfer the property to the city without purchase and the estimate
would only need to be for administrative time.
NM-13 Presidio Child Care Center Paint & Playground Gates – Ms. Dwight
questioned why the estimate was so much higher than the original estimate of
$60,000. Mr. Reeves advised that the Capital Projects staff who did the
estimate for $260,000 had experience as a paint contractor.
NM-15 Hilltop Park Renovation – Ms. Dwight questioned why the estimate was for
$30,000 when the amount quoted to her when she submitted the project was
$15,000 and asked for clarification.
NM-19 Rec Trail Beautification Ph 1 – Ms. Dwight advised that the estimate was too
high. She said Cannery Row Business Association would be doing the work
not the city, and that they were only asking for $70,000.
Mr. Reeves opened Public Comments for New Monterey neighborhood. Having no
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Thursday, March 27, 2014
7
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Thursday, March 27, 2014
requests to speak, Mr. Reeves closed Public Comments for this neighborhood.
COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS
April Harrison (Old Town) had no comment.
Harry Mucha (Villa Del Monte) had no comment.
Pat Venza (Monterey Vista) had no comment.
Sharon Dwight (New Monterey) said the people on Cannery Row have observed an
improvement in the traffic flow since the wavy lines were installed on the Rec Trail
crosswalks and that cyclists actually slow down and look before crossing.
Max Green (Oak Grove) said it was a pleasure as always.
Hank Smith (Fisherman Flats) joked about doing research to find goats that are trained
not to eat environmentally sensitive plants.
Mike Brassfield (Casanova Oak Knoll) thanked the Project Cost Subcommittee for their
guidance regarding this year’s contingency amount.
Rick Heuer (Alta Mesa) said he is the Chair of the Oversight Committee for the MPUSD
bond and that the Oversight Committee may potentially be given the power to help set
the plan for the rest of the projects, although there is not much money left from the bond.
Jayme Fields (Del Monte Beach) had no comment.
Merrily Alley (Del Monte Grove-Laguna Grande) had no comment.
NEXT MEETING
Mr. Reeves advised that the next meeting would be on April 3, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chamber for review of the Oak Grove neighborhood through Citywide projects.
He said the van tour would be April 10 at 3:00 p.m., with the potluck dinner at Hilltop Park
Center at 6:00 p.m., and the Follow-up Review and Public Comment meeting at 7:00
p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Reeves adjourned the meeting at 10:55 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Kim Allen Tom Reeves
Recording Secretary NIP Staff Coordinator
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Thursday, March 27, 2014
8
Agenda
NIP Committee
Neighborhood Improvement Member listing at
Program Committee http://www.monterey.org/en-
Agenda us/cityhall/boardscommissions/
nipcommittee.aspx
Project Review Meeting
Aguajito Oaks – New Monterey NIP Spokesperson
Rick Heuer
Sharon Dwight (Alternate)
Council Chamber Richard Ruccello (Alternate)
Few Memorial Hall Thursday, March 27, 2014
580 Pacific Street NIP Staff Coordinator
Monterey, California 7:00 PM Tom Reeves
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. January 23, 2014 (Continued from February 27, 2014 meeting)
2. February 27, 2014
PUBLIC COMMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS. At this time, the public may speak for a maximum of three minutes on any
subject which is within the jurisdiction of the Monterey Neighborhood Improvement Program
Committee and which is not on the agenda. Any person or group desiring to bring an item to the
attention of the Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee may do so during Public
Comments or by addressing a letter of explanation to: NIP Coordinator, Planning, Engineering,
and Environmental Compliance (PEEC) Division, City Hall, Monterey CA 93940.
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS supply the Committee with written or oral
information that they may wish to take action by placing the item on a future agenda.
3. Purpose of Meeting
4. Van Tour Projects Due to Tom Reeves, Engineering Office
5. March 18, 2014 City Council Comments on Proposed FY 2014/15 NIP Projects
NIP INFORMATIONAL REPORTS
NIP INFORMATIONAL REPORTS allow NIP Committee members to supply information on past
projects, activities, or announcements to the Committee and to request clarification or direction
regarding the item.
6. NIP Spokesperson Reports
PUBLIC APPEARANCE
PUBLIC APPEARANCE items are reports on action or informational issues that might stimulate
public discussion, but that do not require formal noticing. You are welcome to offer your comments
after being recognized by the NIP Staff Coordinator. The Coordinator may limit the time allocated
to each speaker.
7. Recommend City Council Approve Appropriation and Transfer of Funds for Additional
Funding for Eddie Burns Lane Drainage Improvements Project (30n1013) Continued from
February 27, 2014 meeting
8. NIP Project Cost Subcommittee Recommendation for FY2014/15 Contingency Fund
9. Project Review (Aguajito Oaks – New Monterey)
COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS
COMMITTEE MEMBERS may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or
make a brief report on his or her activities. In addition, a Committee member may provide a
referral to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to the body
at a subsequent meeting concerning any NIP matter, or direct staff to place a request to agendize
a matter of business on a future agenda. (G.C. 54954.2)
NEXT MEETING
April 3, 2014
Second Project Review Meeting (Oak Grove – Citywide), Council Chambers, 7:00 p.m.
April 10, 2014
NIP Committee Van Tour, meet behind City Hall at 3:00 p.m.
Potluck at Hilltop Park Center 6:00 – 7:00 p.m.
Follow up Meeting (Aguajito Oaks – New Monterey) at Hilltop Park Center 7:00 – 8:45
p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
Agenda packets may be reviewed by the public in the Engineering Office or on the web at
http://www.monterey.org beginning 72 hours prior to the date of the meeting.
Members of the public have the right to address the Committee on any Agenda items. The Staff
Coordinator will formally open the floor for public comment. However, if you wish to speak to items
during "Consent Agenda" or "Staff Informational Report," please advise the staff or the Coordinator
prior to the action on that item and you will be recognized. Notification, as much in advance as
possible, is appreciated.
Information distributed to the Committee at the meeting becomes part of the public record. A copy of
written material, pictures, etc. should be provided to the Secretary for this purpose. For more agenda
information, call the Engineering Office at 831/646-3921.
CITY OF MONTEREY'S 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES:
Voicemail: 646-3799
FAX: 646-3793
Email: suggest@ci.monterey.ca.us
WebPage: http://www.monterey.org
The City of Monterey is committed to include the disabled in all of its services, programs
and activities. For disabled access to the City, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service
(CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and
Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you require a hearing
amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use CRS to talk to the City Clerk's
Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device or for information on an agenda.
MORE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE BY CALLING 646-3921
NIP Committee Agenda
Thursday, March 27, 2014
2
Get email alerts for Monterey
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.