Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Committee Meeting
Regular MeetingMonterey, CA · April 27, 2016
Minutes
MINUTES
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COMMITTEE
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
7:00 PM
COUNCIL CHAMBER, FEW MEMORIAL HALL
580 PACIFIC STREET
MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
NIP Aguajito Oaks Olivia Morgan, Rep.
Representatives Alta Mesa Rick Heuer, Rep.
& Alternates Casanova-Oak Knolls Richard Ruccello, Rep., Mike Brassfield, Alt.
Present: Del Monte Beach Jayme Fields, Rep.
Del Monte Grove-Laguna Grande Merrily Alley, Rep., Kathleen Baker, Alt.
Fisherman’s Flats Richard Pagnillo, Alt., Tom Rowley, Alt.
Monterey Vista Pat Venza, Rep., Jerry Azevedo, Alt., Hans
Jannasch, Alt.
New Monterey Sharon Dwight, Rep., Carole Hayter, Alt.
Oak Grove Luz Adam, Alt.
Old Town April Harrison, Rep.
Skyline Forest Dennis Duke, Rep.
Skyline Ridge Julie Engell, Rep.
Villa Del Monte Katrina Hintze, Rep.
Staff Members Present: Jeff Krebs, Sara Myers, Louie Marcuzzo, Laurie Williamson, Rose
Dickson, Scott Connolly, Justin George, Dennis Copeland, Claire Rygg,
Inga Waite, Gaudenz Panholzer, Kim Bui-Burton
CALL TO ORDER
NIP Staff Coordinator Jeff Krebs called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Thirteen neighborhoods were represented with Deer Flats unrepresented.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
No minutes were available for approval.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Krebs opened public comments for items not on the agenda.
Mayor Clyde Roberson stated he received some emails from the NIP committee recently
regarding ADA requirements. He described the formation and initial intent of NIP. He
advised that he met with Mike McCarthy and their intention was never for NIP to be a
maintenance fund for the City.
Seeing no further comments, Mr. Krebs closed public comments.
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
1. Verify NIP Committee Participants Have Attended or Viewed All Four NIP Project Review
Meetings
Mr. Krebs confirmed that all voting NIP representatives have attended or viewed all four
meetings. Mr. Heuer confirmed he listened to the tape of the meeting he missed.
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016
2. Explain the Voting Process
Mr. Krebs described the voting process. He explained that the evening will consist of
public comment, then come back to the dais for discussion, and then voting.
3. NIP Financial Report
Mr. Krebs presented the NIP financial report.
4. Addressing Proposed Facility Projects with Accessibility Requirements
Mr. Krebs discussed his memo to Dino Pick, Deputy City Manager, Plans and Public
Works, and presented the ADA price reductions for projects. Mr. Krebs also presented
the following changes from when the agenda mailed out last week:
DT-1 Estimate changed to $175,000.
FF-2 Removed.
MV-7 Combined with MV-8 for a total of $50,000.
MV-10 Estimate changed to $64,000.
NM-11 Combined A&B into one project for $162,000.
NM-13 Estimate changed to $62,000.
NM-21 Estimate changed to $412,000.
OG-2 Pulled.
VDM-4 Removed.
VDM-5 Estimate changed to $80,000.
CW-3 Estimate changed to $213,000.
CW-20 Project split into 5 items.
CW-21 Divided into 2 projects and Pony League is providing $50,000.
CW-23 Rescoped as a design/permit project for $57,000.
CW-25 Removed.
CW-27 A, B, and C are pulled.
CW-31 Combined with CW-32.
Mr. Krebs advised that all changes are reflected on the walls.
NIP INFORMATIONAL REPORTS
5. NIP Spokesperson Reports
Mr. Heuer stated he has nothing to report.
PUBLIC APPEARANCE
6. Voting Process For FY 2016/17 NIP Program
a Public Comment
Briana Brady brought her family and thanked the committee for supporting the
Larkin Park swings.
Abigail Care, Jeff Condit, Nancy Suffrage, and Mary Conway spoke in support of
DT-1.
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
2
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016
Bryce Craft spoke against FF-3. He stated that the proposed light will be installed
directly in front of his house.
Tom Reeves spoke in support of DMG-1, CW-39, and CW-38. He emphasized the
community support he has received by proposing CW-38.
Anne Brady, Cannery Row Business Association, spoke in support of NM-6.
Claire Rygg, Friends of the Monterey Public Library, spoke in support of CW-23
and CW-24.
Rebecca Perry, MVNA board member, spoke in support of MV-2. She explained
that there are two homeowners affected by the project, but they have not objected.
The residents have given this project their highest support.
Mary Ann Finocchi spoke in support of OT-4, OT-3, CW-12, and CW-28.
Barbara Moore spoke in support of MV-9 due to concern over the standing water
in the area.
Colleen Sullivan, Old Town resident, spoke in support of OT-3, OT-4, CW-12,
CW20, and CW-28.
Inga Waite, Library Director, thanked the NIP committee for their work. She
advised that the Library Board had a meeting earlier in the day and they reaffirmed
their support for CW-22, CW-24, and CW-23.
Dennis Copeland, Museums and Archives Manager presented a letter from Chase
Weaver regarding CW-23 thanking NIP for their many years of support for
community history and heritage.
Steve Morton, Acting Urban Forester, spoke in support of all greenbelt projects:
AM-2, FF-1, MV-77, SF3, and SF-4.
Valerie Cantly, Yvonne Pointer Ramos, and Rafael Ramos spoke in support of
MV-7.
Charles Martin thanked Mr. Krebs for lowering the price of MV-10 and spoke in
support of the project.
Dan Albert, Associate Superintendant of MPUSD, stated that Monterey High
School uses Jack Park and would not be able to have a softball team without it.
He spoke in support of CW-21.
Joe De Ruosi, President of Monterey Pony Baseball/Softball, thanked NIP for their
civic commitment and spoke in support of CW-6, CW-21A, CW-21B, CW-35.
Phil Santora, Monterey High School softball coach, spoke in support of CW-6, CW-
21A, and CW-21B. He expressed the importance of the softball field for Monterey
High students to receive scholarships.
Alice Yaminishi, Library Board member, spoke in support of CW-24, CW-23, and
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
3
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016
CW-22.
Ellen McEwen, Parks and Recreation Commission Chair, supported NM-20,
advising that the facility would benefit from an analysis. She also spoke in support
of CW-28.
Jennifer Bodensteiner spoke in support of CW-21A and CW-21B.
Sandy Palazzolo stated that there was a miscommunication regarding FF-3 and
that the project has to do with safety in the neighborhood.
Tom Rowley spoke in support of FF-3 and CW-31.
Roger Eisley spoke in support of GW-1.
Mike Sovereign, Chairman of the Colton Hall Museum and Cultural Arts, advised
that they have prioritized CW-3A and CW-35.
Bill McCrone, Old Monterey Foundation, asked for support for CW-35 and advised
that they have previously raised $200,000 and expect to raise another $100,000
by November.
Gaudenz Panholzer, Fire Chief, spoke in favor of all greenbelt projects as we head
into high fire season. He also advised that CW-20 has been broken down into five
separate projects and their main priorities are CW-20A and CW-20B.
Kevin Clement spoke in support of DMG-1 and CW-38.
Doyle Daughtry advised that he lives in Montsalas and spoke in support of CW-4.
Seeing no further comments, Mr. Krebs closed public comment.
b NIP Representative Comment and Base Allocation Funding Requests (Fully
Funded)
Mr. Heuer stated that he spoke with Mr. Marcuzzo and has adjusted the cost of
AM-4 to $2,175. He would like to fund the project with base allocation. Mr. Heuer
made a motion to fully fund AM-4 with base allocation. Ms. Dwight seconded
the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives
present.
Mr. Ruccello advised that they would like to fully fund COK-2 for $10,000. Mr.
Heuer made a motion to fully fund COK-2 with base allocation. Mr. Pagnilllo
seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen
representatives present.
Ms. Alley advised that Del Monte Grove/Laguna Grande would like to fully fund
DMG-2. Mr. Heuer made a motion to fully fund DMG-2 with base allocation.
Ms. Dwight seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen
representatives present.
Ms. Dwight advised that New Monterey will fully fund NM-5 for $5,000. Mr. Heuer
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
4
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016
made a motion to fully fund NM-5 with base allocation. Mr. Pagnilllo
seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen
representatives present.
Ms. Dwight stated they will fully funding NM-9 for $3,000. Mr. Heuer made a
motion to fully fund NM-9 with base allocation. Ms. Fields seconded the
motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present.
Ms. Dwight stated they will fully fund NM-14 for $8,000. Mr. Heuer made a motion
to fully fund NM-14 with base allocation. Mr. Duke seconded the motion. The
motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. Ms. Dwight
stated they will fully fund NM-15 for $5,000. Ms. Hintze made a motion to fully
fund NM-15 with base allocation. Mr. Pagnilllo seconded the motion. The
motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. Ms. Dwight
stated they will fully fund NM-17 for $10,800. Mr. Heuer made a motion to fully
fund NM-17 with base allocation. Mr. Pagnilllo seconded the motion. The
motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. Ms. Dwight
stated they will fully fund CW-30B for $5,000. Mr. Pagnillo made a motion to
fully fund CW-30B. Mr. Heuer seconded the motion. The motion was
approved by the thirteen representatives present.
Mr. Pagnillo, Ms. Venza, Ms. Adam, Ms. Harrison, Mr. Duke, Ms. Engell, and Ms.
Hintze advised that they have no projects to fully fund with base at this time.
Mr. Krebs asked the committee if they had an interest in adding funds to the
contingency. Mr. Duke made a motion to add $450,000 to the NIP Contingency
Account. Mr. Ruccello seconded the motion. The motion was approved by
the thirteen representatives present.
Mr. Krebs asked the committee for their priorities.
Mr. Heuer stated that Alta Mesa’s priorities have not changed. He suggested that
the committee consider neighborhood priorities for the first round before
considering Citywide projects.
Mr. Ruccello stated that Casanova Oak Knoll’s priorities are COK-1 and then
COK-4. He advised that because of the ADA requirements, they are not supporting
COK-3. He seconded Mr. Heuer’s comment regarding neighborhood priorities.
Ms. Fields had no comment.
Ms. Venza advised that Monterey Vista’s priorities are MV-2, MV-6, then MV-9.
She stated that in the second round of voting, they will prioritize MV-7. As for base
allocation, Ms. Venza stated they will put $1,000 on AM-2, $1,000 on DF-1, $1,000
on FF-1, $5,000 on MV-2, $2,500 on MV-6, $1,000 on SF-3, $2,500 on CW-12,
and $1,000 on CW-37.
Ms. Alley advised that Del Monte Grove-Laguna Grande’s priorities are DMG-3
and DMG-1. As for base allocation, they will put $7,822 on DMG-3 and $1,000 on
DMG-1. She asked for support for DMG-3.
Mr. Pagnillo stated that Fisherman Flats’ priorities are FF-1, FF-4, and FF-3. As for
base allocation, they will put $1,852 on FF-1, $1,000 on FF-3, $1,000 on FF-4, and
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
5
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016
$1,000 on CW-31.
Ms. Dwight stated that she supports the idea of CW-23, but would like to look at
different locations instead of just the library. Ms. Dwight made a motion for NM-
13 to be just $40,000 and to remove the ADA costs. Mr. Heuer seconded the
motion, adding that there will need to be a time restriction. The motion was
approved by the thirteen representatives present.
Ms. Dwight advised that New Monterey’s priorities are NM-7, NM-11, NM-8, NM-
21, NM-6, NM-10, NM-16, CW-11, and CW-13.
Ms. Adam stated that Oak Grove will put $10,000 of their base allocation on OG-2
and $3,000 on OG-1.
Ms. Harrison advised that Old Town’s priorities are OT-3, OT-1, and then OT-4. As
for base allocation, they will put $10,000 on OT-3, $10,000 on OT-1, and $5,000
on OT-4.
Mr. Duke advised that Skyline Forest’s priorities are SF-3, SF-4, SF-2, and then
CW-36.
Ms. Morgan advised that Aguajito Oaks will place their entire base of $727 on FF-
3.
Ms. Engell stated that Skyline Ridge cannot support SR-1 at $15,000. They will
give their entire base allocation of $1,132 to MV-7.
Ms. Hintze stated that Villa Del Monte’s priorities are VDM-3, VMD-2, and then
VDM-5. As for base allocation, they will put $9,000 on VDM-2, $4,000 on CW-18,
$1,000 on CW-8, $1,000 on CW-37, and $1,000 on MV-6.
Mr. Krebs instructed committee to put base allocation and priorities on the voting
sheets. He described the voting process and released the committee to vote.
c Select Projects by Voting (Public Comment, Committee Comment, Vote, Tally)
Round One
1. AM-2 72 points. $25,000
Base Allocation: MV $1,000
2. SF-3 63 points. $50,000
Base Allocation: MV $1,000
3. MV-7 50 points. $50,000
Base Allocation: SR $1,132
4. COK-4 48 points. $100,000
Base Allocation: None.
5. NM-7 48 points. $100,000
Base Allocation: None.
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
6
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016
6. DMG-3 47 points. $264,000
Base Allocation: DMG $7,822
7. COK-1 47 points. $30,000
Base Allocation: None.
8. FF-1 46 points. $25,000
Base Allocation: MV $1,000
FF $1,852
9. OT-3 39 points. $28,000
Base Allocation: OT $10,000
10 MV-6 30 points. $25,000
Base Allocation: MV $2,500
VDM $1,000
Mr. Krebs opened public comment before the second round of voting.
Ellen McEwen spoke in support of CW-37 and CW-28.
Tom Reeves spoke in support of DMG-1, CW-39, and CW-38.
Mike Sovereign spoke in support of CW-3A and CW-35.
Joe De Ruosi spoke in support of CW-35 and emphasized the importance of the
project for Monterey’s history. As for CW-21B, he stated that they would like to
revise the estimate and only ask for $200,000.
Barbara Moore spoke in support of MV-9.
Rebecca Perry of Monterey Vista thanked the committee for funding MV-6 and
MV-7. She asked for support for the neighborhood’s number one priority.
Steve Morton spoke in support of CW-16.
Inga Waite responded to Ms. Dwight’s earlier comment regarding the location of
the Library vault. She stated that they would be happy to consider an alternative
location if that would gain support for the project.
Charles Martin spoke in support of MV-10.
Kevin Clement spoke in support of DMG-1 and CW-38.
Richard Ruccello thanked the committee for funding Casanova Oak Knoll projects
and spoke in support of DT-1, MV-1, NM-6, VDM-5, CW-5, CW-6, CW-8, CW-12,
CW-16, CW-20B, CW-23, CW-24, and CW-31.
Tom Rowley spoke in support of FF-3 and CW-31.
Katrina Hintze spoke in support of VDM-5.
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
7
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016
Bryce Craft spoke against FF-3. He stated that he has tried to compromise with
the project proponent, but he does not want the light in front of his house.
Seeing no further comments, Mr. Krebs closed public comment.
Mr. Heuer advised that there are four neighborhoods who have not received
funding: Villa Del Monte, Deer Flats, Glenwood, and Oak Grove. He also stated
that FF-3 is a controversial project and he does not want to fund a controversial
project. He also spoke in support of AM-3.
Mr. Brassfield agreed with Mr. Heuer regarding FF-3. He advised that Casanova
Oak Knoll will put $500 base allocation on DT-1 and $4,511 on CW-31.
Ms. Fields encouraged the committee to consider Citywide projects, especially
CW-35, CW-31, and CW-36. She advised that Del Monte Beach will put $500 of
their base allocation on CW-37 and $500 on CW-8.
Ms. Venza spoke regarding the time limit on CW-12. She advised that Monterey
Vista will put an additional $5,000 on MV-2, $1,000 on DMG-1, and will fully fund
MV-1 with base allocation. Mr. Heuer made a motion to fully fund MV-1 with
base allocation. Mr. Pagnillo seconded the motion. The motion was
approved by the thirteen representatives present.
Mr. Duke asked for support for SF-4. He agreed with supporting AM-3, NM-20,
CW-11, CW-31, CW-36, and CW-38.
Ms. Morgan spoke in favor of FF-3.
Ms. Hayter emphasized the importance of drainage and greenbelt projects.
Ms. Pavlo spoke in support of VDM-5.
Mr. Pagnillo advised that there was a proposed compromise for FF-3, but it
significantly increased the cost because there is already a pole at the proposed
location.
Ms. Harrison reminded the committee that she has placed $10,000 of base
allocation on OT-1.
Ms. Alley, Ms. Engell, and Ms. Adam had no comment.
Mr. Krebs began the second round of voting.
Round Two
1. VDM-5 58 points. $80,000
Base Allocation: None.
2. CW-31 51 points. $64,000
Base Allocation: FF $1,000
DMB $500
COK $1,000
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
8
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016
3. AM-3 49 points. $35,000
Base Allocation: None.
4. MV-2 41 points. $220,000
Base Allocation: MV $10,000
5. CW-16 39 points. $40,000
Base Allocation: COK $500
6. DT-1 37 points. $175,000
Base Allocation: DT All base
7. DMG-1 36 points. $26,000
Base Allocation: DMG $1,000
MV $1,000
8. CW-38 30 points. 370,000
Base Allocation: None.
9. CW-35 29 points. $350,000
Base Allocation: COK $500
10 CW-8 29 points. $40,000
Base Allocation: VDM $1,000
DMB $500
Mr. Krebs opened public comments for the third round of voting.
Tom Reeves thanked the committee for funding CW-38.
Mike Sovereign thanked the committee for funding CW-35 and asked for support
for CW-3A.
Diane Brady asked for support for NM-6.
Barbara Moroe spoke in support of MV-9 and advised the committee that this
project has overwhelming neighborhood support.
Joe De Ruosi spoke in support of CW-6, CW-21A, and CW-21B.
Dennis Copeland asked for support for CW-3A
Charles Martin spoke in support of MV-10 and advised that the price has gone
down to $24,000.
Richard Ruccell asked the committee to emphasize each neighborhood’s priorities
again and advised that base allocation can be used as a negotiating tool. He
spoke in support of NM-16, CW-11, NM-20, CW-3A, CW-5, CW-6, CW-12, CW-23,
and CW-28.
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
9
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016
Chief Panholzer thanked the committee for their support of the greenbelt projects.
He asked for support for Fire Station 3 and emphasized the need for CW-20B.
Inga Waite asked the committee to support the Library Board’s number one
priority: CW-23.
Kevin Clement thanked the committee for DMG-1 and CW-38.
Lacy Spangler, Parks and Recreation Vice Chair, spoke in support of CW-37, NM-
20, and CW-28.
Scott Connolly spoke in support of CW-34.
Seeing no further comments, Mr. Krebs closed public comment.
Mr. Heuer stated that CW-12 is critical. He spoke in support of OT-1, NM-20, CW-
3, CW-6, CW-20B, CW-21A, and CW-24.
Ms. Venza advised that Monterey Vista will move $1,000 of their base allocation
from DF-1 to CW-12 and $1,000 from OG-1 to CW-3A. She stated that their last
priority is MV-9.
Mr. Duke asked for support for SF-4 and supported CW-20 and MV-9.
Ms. Morgan asked for support for FF-3.
Ms. Dwight asked for support for NM-11, MV-9, NM-8, NM-21, NM-6, GW-1, CW-
3A, CW-4, OT-4, and CW-37. She advised that New Monterey will put their
remaining base of $2,140 on CW-37. She stated that Deer Flats does not have a
representative present, but their number one priority is DF-1.
Ms. Hintze advised that Villa Del Monte will fully fund CW-18 with base allocation.
Mr. Heuer made a motion to fully fund CW-18 with base allocation. Ms. Fields
seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen
representatives present. Ms. Hintze spoke in favor of NM-6, GW-1, CW-6, CW-
12, CW-20B, and CW-34. She advised that VDM-2 will only cost $20,000 to fund
and it is their priority.
Mr. Pagnillo asked for support for FF-4.
Ms. Harrison thanked the committee for funding OT-3. She asked for support for
OT-1 and OT-4 and emphasized the base allocation she has given both of those
projects.
Ms. Baker and Ms. Engell asked for support for CW-19.
Ms. Adams asked for support for OG-1. She advised that Oak Grove will put
$1,000 on MV-9, $1,000 on CW-23, $1,000 on CW-24, $1,000 on OT-1, $2,000 on
OG-1, and $6,000 on OG-2.
Mr. Brassfield and Ms. Fields has no comment.
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
10
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016
Mr. Krebs began the third round of voting.
Round Three
1. MV-9 63 points.$61,000
Base Allocation: MV $5,500
OG $1,000
2. CW-12 59 points. $89,000
Base Allocation: MV $3,500
3. CW-20B 52 points. $40,000
Base Allocation: COK $2,511
4. OT-1 51 points. $35,000
Base Allocation: OT $ 10,000
5. SF-4 48 points. $50,000
Base Allocation: SF $735
6. CW-3A 43 points. $213,000
Base Allocation: MV $1,000
7. NM-6 36 points. $25,000
Base Allocation: None.
8. CW-6 36 points. $35,000
Base Allocation: None.
9. OT-4 31 points. $31,000
Base Allocation: OT $5,000
10 CW-37 30 points. $8,000
Base Allocation: NM $2,140
11 CW-19 30 points. $25,000
Base Allocation: None.
Mr. Krebs opened public comment for the fourth round of voting.
Anne Brady thanked the committee for funding NM-6.
Tom Reeves spoke in support of NM-20.
Charles Martin spoke in support of MV-10 and advised that the price will go up
next year.
Dennis Copeland spoke in support of CW-23 and CW-3A.
Ellen McEwen thanked the committee for funding CW-37 and asked for support for
NM-20 and CW-28.
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
11
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016
Jennifer Bodensteiner spoke in support of CW-21A and CW-21B.
Seeing no further comments, Mr. Krebs closed public comment.
Mr. Heuer stated it would be nice to see projects funded in Deer Flats, Oak Grove,
and Glenwood. He advised he will support GW-1, NM-20, CW-24, and CW-21A.
Mr. Ruccello agreed that Deer Flats and Oak Grove deserve support. He spoke in
support of NM-20.
Ms. Fields asked if it would be less expensive if NM-20 and CW-28 were
combined. Ms. McEwen stated she would be agreeable if it was a significant cost
difference. Mr. Krebs advised that it would not make a significant difference.
Ms. Dwight spoke in support of NM-11A and NM-11B, NM-8, NM-16, CW-11, GW-
1, and CW-4.
Ms. Hintze asked for support for VDM-2 and reminded the committee that Villa Del
Monte has put $10,000 of their base allocation on this project.
Ms. Venza, Mr. Duke, Ms. Morgan, Mr. Pagnillo, Ms. Harrison, Ms. Baker, Ms.
Engell, and Ms. Adam had no comment.
Mr. Krebs began the fourth round of voting.
Round Four
1. GW-1 92 points. $146,000
Base Allocation: GW $7,447
Mr. Heuer made a motion to move Glenwood’s base allocation of $7,447 to
GW-1. Ms. Dwight seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the
thirteen representatives present.
2. CW-4 65 points. $29,000
Base Allocation: None.
3. OG-1 63 points. $20,000
Base Allocation: OG $12,315
4. VDM-2 60 points. $30,000
Base Allocation: VDM $8,680
MV $1,000
Cut off-projects:
Mr. Krebs advised that DF-1 received partial funding.
5. DF-1 54 points.$177,000
Base Allocation: DF $3,382
Mr. Pagnillo made a motion to apply Deer Flat’s base allocation of $3,382 to
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
12
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016
DF-1. Ms Fields seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the
thirteen representatives present.
6. CW-21A 51 points. $23,000
Base Allocation: None.
7. CW-11 48 points. $40,000
Base Allocation: None.
8. NM-20 46 points. $80,000
Base Allocation: None.
Ms. Dwight suggested spending remaining base allocation. Mr. Heuer stated
remaining base allocation can roll over into next year. Mr. Brassfield advised that
the money can be held for one cycle. Ms. Adam stated she will put Oak Grove’s
remaining base allocation on OG-1. Mr. Duke advised that he will put his
remaining base allocation of $735 on SF-4.
Mr. Heuer made a motion to apply Downtown’s base to DT-2. Mr. Duke
seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen
representatives present.
COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS
Rick Heuer said good night.
Mike Brassfield thanked everyone for staying so late.
Jayme Fields thanked everyone for making it work.
Pat Venza thanked the committee and staff.
Dennis Duke said thanks, good job.
Olivia Morgan thanked staff for their hard work behind the scenes.
Sharon Dwight thanked staff, committee, and public for their work. She advised that the
committee will meet next to discuss the Policies and Procedures Manual. She suggested
that he finance subcommittee follow up with staff to discuss whether CIP projects are
billed the same as NIP projects.
Katirina Hintze thanked the committee for funding VDM-2.
Richard Pagnillo had no comment.
April Harrison advised that an issue came up with a current NIP project in her
neighborhood and it will need to be discussed at a later date.
Kathleen Baker said goodnight.
Julie Engell had no comment.
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
13
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016
Luz Adam said good night.
NEXT MEETING
7. Special Meeting to be Scheduled as Needed
ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Krebs adjourned the meeting at 1:14 a.m.
Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Sara Myers Jeff Krebs, P.E.
Recording Secretary NIP Staff Coordinator
Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
14
Agenda
NIP Committee
Member listing at
Neighborhood Improvement http://www.monterey.org/en-
Program Committee Agenda us/cityhall/boardscommissions/
nipcommittee.aspx
NIP Spokesperson
Rick Heuer
Sharon Dwight (Alternate)
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
Richard Ruccello (Alternate)
7:00 PM NIP Staff Coordinator
Monterey, California
Jeff Krebs
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
PUBLIC COMMENTS
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
1. Verify NIP Committee Participants Have Attended or Viewed All Four NIP Project Review
Meetings
2. Explain the Voting Process
3. NIP Financial Report
4. Addressing Proposed Facility Projects with Accessibility Requirements
NIP INFORMATIONAL REPORTS
5. NIP Spokesperson Reports
PUBLIC APPEARANCE
6. Voting Process For FY 2016/17 NIP Program
a Public Comment
b NIP Representative Comment and Base Allocation Funding Requests (Fully
Funded)
c Select Projects by Voting (Public Comment, Committee Comment, Vote, Tally)
COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS
NEXT MEETING
7. Special Meeting to be Scheduled as Needed
ADJOURNMENT
Agenda packets may be reviewed by the public in the Engineering Office or on the web at
http://www.monterey.org beginning 72 hours prior to the date of the meeting.
Members of the public have the right to address the Committee on any Agenda items. The Staff
Coordinator will formally open the floor for public comment. However, if you wish to speak to items
during "Consent Agenda" or "Staff Informational Report," please advise the staff or the Coordinator
prior to the action on that item and you will be recognized. Notification, as much in advance as
possible, is appreciated.
Information distributed to the Committee at the meeting becomes part of the public record. A copy of
written material, pictures, etc. should be provided to the Secretary for this purpose. For more agenda
information, call the Engineering Office at 831-646-3921.
CITY OF MONTEREY'S 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES:
Voicemail: 831-646-3799
FAX: 831-646-3793
Email: suggest@monterey.org
WebPage: http://www.monterey.org
The City of Monterey is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs
and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special
assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (831) 646-
3935. Notification 30 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title
II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. For communication-related
assistance, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS
offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7
days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use
CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device.
UPCOMING MEETINGS AT CITY HALL
Apr 28 Disabled Access Appeals Board Meeting Cancellation, Council Chamber - 2:00 PM
May 2 MP Regional Water Authority TAC Meeting, Council Chamber - 10:30 AM
May 3 Council Regular Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
May 4 Architectural Review Committee Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
May 5 Zoning Administrator Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
May 10 Planning Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
May 12 Historic Preservation Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
May 12 MP Regional Water Authority Meeting, TBD - 7:00 PM
May 17 Council Regular Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
May 18 Architectural Review Committee Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
May 19 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM
May 19 Zoning Administrator Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
NIP Committee Agenda
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
2
May 24 Planning Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
May 25 Oversight Board Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM
May 25 Council Study Session, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
May 25 Library Board Meeting, Library Community Room - 5:00 PM
May 30 Colton Hall Museum Cultural Art Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Jun 1 Architectural Review Committee Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Jun 2 Zoning Administrator Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Jun 6 MP Regional Water Authority TAC Meeting, Council Chamber - 10:30 AM
MORE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE BY CALLING 646-3921
NIP Committee Agenda
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
3
Get email alerts for Monterey
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.