Muyni
← Back to Monterey

Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Committee Meeting

Regular Meeting

Monterey, CA · April 27, 2016

AgendaMinutesPacket

Minutes

MINUTES NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COMMITTEE Wednesday, April 27, 2016 7:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBER, FEW MEMORIAL HALL 580 PACIFIC STREET MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA NIP Aguajito Oaks Olivia Morgan, Rep. Representatives Alta Mesa Rick Heuer, Rep. & Alternates Casanova-Oak Knolls Richard Ruccello, Rep., Mike Brassfield, Alt. Present: Del Monte Beach Jayme Fields, Rep. Del Monte Grove-Laguna Grande Merrily Alley, Rep., Kathleen Baker, Alt. Fisherman’s Flats Richard Pagnillo, Alt., Tom Rowley, Alt. Monterey Vista Pat Venza, Rep., Jerry Azevedo, Alt., Hans Jannasch, Alt. New Monterey Sharon Dwight, Rep., Carole Hayter, Alt. Oak Grove Luz Adam, Alt. Old Town April Harrison, Rep. Skyline Forest Dennis Duke, Rep. Skyline Ridge Julie Engell, Rep. Villa Del Monte Katrina Hintze, Rep. Staff Members Present: Jeff Krebs, Sara Myers, Louie Marcuzzo, Laurie Williamson, Rose Dickson, Scott Connolly, Justin George, Dennis Copeland, Claire Rygg, Inga Waite, Gaudenz Panholzer, Kim Bui-Burton CALL TO ORDER NIP Staff Coordinator Jeff Krebs called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL Thirteen neighborhoods were represented with Deer Flats unrepresented. APPROVAL OF MINUTES No minutes were available for approval. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Krebs opened public comments for items not on the agenda. Mayor Clyde Roberson stated he received some emails from the NIP committee recently regarding ADA requirements. He described the formation and initial intent of NIP. He advised that he met with Mike McCarthy and their intention was never for NIP to be a maintenance fund for the City. Seeing no further comments, Mr. Krebs closed public comments. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS 1. Verify NIP Committee Participants Have Attended or Viewed All Four NIP Project Review Meetings Mr. Krebs confirmed that all voting NIP representatives have attended or viewed all four meetings. Mr. Heuer confirmed he listened to the tape of the meeting he missed. Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 2. Explain the Voting Process Mr. Krebs described the voting process. He explained that the evening will consist of public comment, then come back to the dais for discussion, and then voting. 3. NIP Financial Report Mr. Krebs presented the NIP financial report. 4. Addressing Proposed Facility Projects with Accessibility Requirements Mr. Krebs discussed his memo to Dino Pick, Deputy City Manager, Plans and Public Works, and presented the ADA price reductions for projects. Mr. Krebs also presented the following changes from when the agenda mailed out last week: DT-1 Estimate changed to $175,000. FF-2 Removed. MV-7 Combined with MV-8 for a total of $50,000. MV-10 Estimate changed to $64,000. NM-11 Combined A&B into one project for $162,000. NM-13 Estimate changed to $62,000. NM-21 Estimate changed to $412,000. OG-2 Pulled. VDM-4 Removed. VDM-5 Estimate changed to $80,000. CW-3 Estimate changed to $213,000. CW-20 Project split into 5 items. CW-21 Divided into 2 projects and Pony League is providing $50,000. CW-23 Rescoped as a design/permit project for $57,000. CW-25 Removed. CW-27 A, B, and C are pulled. CW-31 Combined with CW-32. Mr. Krebs advised that all changes are reflected on the walls. NIP INFORMATIONAL REPORTS 5. NIP Spokesperson Reports Mr. Heuer stated he has nothing to report. PUBLIC APPEARANCE 6. Voting Process For FY 2016/17 NIP Program a Public Comment Briana Brady brought her family and thanked the committee for supporting the Larkin Park swings. Abigail Care, Jeff Condit, Nancy Suffrage, and Mary Conway spoke in support of DT-1. Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 2 Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 Bryce Craft spoke against FF-3. He stated that the proposed light will be installed directly in front of his house. Tom Reeves spoke in support of DMG-1, CW-39, and CW-38. He emphasized the community support he has received by proposing CW-38. Anne Brady, Cannery Row Business Association, spoke in support of NM-6. Claire Rygg, Friends of the Monterey Public Library, spoke in support of CW-23 and CW-24. Rebecca Perry, MVNA board member, spoke in support of MV-2. She explained that there are two homeowners affected by the project, but they have not objected. The residents have given this project their highest support. Mary Ann Finocchi spoke in support of OT-4, OT-3, CW-12, and CW-28. Barbara Moore spoke in support of MV-9 due to concern over the standing water in the area. Colleen Sullivan, Old Town resident, spoke in support of OT-3, OT-4, CW-12, CW20, and CW-28. Inga Waite, Library Director, thanked the NIP committee for their work. She advised that the Library Board had a meeting earlier in the day and they reaffirmed their support for CW-22, CW-24, and CW-23. Dennis Copeland, Museums and Archives Manager presented a letter from Chase Weaver regarding CW-23 thanking NIP for their many years of support for community history and heritage. Steve Morton, Acting Urban Forester, spoke in support of all greenbelt projects: AM-2, FF-1, MV-77, SF3, and SF-4. Valerie Cantly, Yvonne Pointer Ramos, and Rafael Ramos spoke in support of MV-7. Charles Martin thanked Mr. Krebs for lowering the price of MV-10 and spoke in support of the project. Dan Albert, Associate Superintendant of MPUSD, stated that Monterey High School uses Jack Park and would not be able to have a softball team without it. He spoke in support of CW-21. Joe De Ruosi, President of Monterey Pony Baseball/Softball, thanked NIP for their civic commitment and spoke in support of CW-6, CW-21A, CW-21B, CW-35. Phil Santora, Monterey High School softball coach, spoke in support of CW-6, CW- 21A, and CW-21B. He expressed the importance of the softball field for Monterey High students to receive scholarships. Alice Yaminishi, Library Board member, spoke in support of CW-24, CW-23, and Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 3 Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 CW-22. Ellen McEwen, Parks and Recreation Commission Chair, supported NM-20, advising that the facility would benefit from an analysis. She also spoke in support of CW-28. Jennifer Bodensteiner spoke in support of CW-21A and CW-21B. Sandy Palazzolo stated that there was a miscommunication regarding FF-3 and that the project has to do with safety in the neighborhood. Tom Rowley spoke in support of FF-3 and CW-31. Roger Eisley spoke in support of GW-1. Mike Sovereign, Chairman of the Colton Hall Museum and Cultural Arts, advised that they have prioritized CW-3A and CW-35. Bill McCrone, Old Monterey Foundation, asked for support for CW-35 and advised that they have previously raised $200,000 and expect to raise another $100,000 by November. Gaudenz Panholzer, Fire Chief, spoke in favor of all greenbelt projects as we head into high fire season. He also advised that CW-20 has been broken down into five separate projects and their main priorities are CW-20A and CW-20B. Kevin Clement spoke in support of DMG-1 and CW-38. Doyle Daughtry advised that he lives in Montsalas and spoke in support of CW-4. Seeing no further comments, Mr. Krebs closed public comment. b NIP Representative Comment and Base Allocation Funding Requests (Fully Funded) Mr. Heuer stated that he spoke with Mr. Marcuzzo and has adjusted the cost of AM-4 to $2,175. He would like to fund the project with base allocation. Mr. Heuer made a motion to fully fund AM-4 with base allocation. Ms. Dwight seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. Mr. Ruccello advised that they would like to fully fund COK-2 for $10,000. Mr. Heuer made a motion to fully fund COK-2 with base allocation. Mr. Pagnilllo seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. Ms. Alley advised that Del Monte Grove/Laguna Grande would like to fully fund DMG-2. Mr. Heuer made a motion to fully fund DMG-2 with base allocation. Ms. Dwight seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. Ms. Dwight advised that New Monterey will fully fund NM-5 for $5,000. Mr. Heuer Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 4 Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 made a motion to fully fund NM-5 with base allocation. Mr. Pagnilllo seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. Ms. Dwight stated they will fully funding NM-9 for $3,000. Mr. Heuer made a motion to fully fund NM-9 with base allocation. Ms. Fields seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. Ms. Dwight stated they will fully fund NM-14 for $8,000. Mr. Heuer made a motion to fully fund NM-14 with base allocation. Mr. Duke seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. Ms. Dwight stated they will fully fund NM-15 for $5,000. Ms. Hintze made a motion to fully fund NM-15 with base allocation. Mr. Pagnilllo seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. Ms. Dwight stated they will fully fund NM-17 for $10,800. Mr. Heuer made a motion to fully fund NM-17 with base allocation. Mr. Pagnilllo seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. Ms. Dwight stated they will fully fund CW-30B for $5,000. Mr. Pagnillo made a motion to fully fund CW-30B. Mr. Heuer seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. Mr. Pagnillo, Ms. Venza, Ms. Adam, Ms. Harrison, Mr. Duke, Ms. Engell, and Ms. Hintze advised that they have no projects to fully fund with base at this time. Mr. Krebs asked the committee if they had an interest in adding funds to the contingency. Mr. Duke made a motion to add $450,000 to the NIP Contingency Account. Mr. Ruccello seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. Mr. Krebs asked the committee for their priorities. Mr. Heuer stated that Alta Mesa’s priorities have not changed. He suggested that the committee consider neighborhood priorities for the first round before considering Citywide projects. Mr. Ruccello stated that Casanova Oak Knoll’s priorities are COK-1 and then COK-4. He advised that because of the ADA requirements, they are not supporting COK-3. He seconded Mr. Heuer’s comment regarding neighborhood priorities. Ms. Fields had no comment. Ms. Venza advised that Monterey Vista’s priorities are MV-2, MV-6, then MV-9. She stated that in the second round of voting, they will prioritize MV-7. As for base allocation, Ms. Venza stated they will put $1,000 on AM-2, $1,000 on DF-1, $1,000 on FF-1, $5,000 on MV-2, $2,500 on MV-6, $1,000 on SF-3, $2,500 on CW-12, and $1,000 on CW-37. Ms. Alley advised that Del Monte Grove-Laguna Grande’s priorities are DMG-3 and DMG-1. As for base allocation, they will put $7,822 on DMG-3 and $1,000 on DMG-1. She asked for support for DMG-3. Mr. Pagnillo stated that Fisherman Flats’ priorities are FF-1, FF-4, and FF-3. As for base allocation, they will put $1,852 on FF-1, $1,000 on FF-3, $1,000 on FF-4, and Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 5 Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 $1,000 on CW-31. Ms. Dwight stated that she supports the idea of CW-23, but would like to look at different locations instead of just the library. Ms. Dwight made a motion for NM- 13 to be just $40,000 and to remove the ADA costs. Mr. Heuer seconded the motion, adding that there will need to be a time restriction. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. Ms. Dwight advised that New Monterey’s priorities are NM-7, NM-11, NM-8, NM- 21, NM-6, NM-10, NM-16, CW-11, and CW-13. Ms. Adam stated that Oak Grove will put $10,000 of their base allocation on OG-2 and $3,000 on OG-1. Ms. Harrison advised that Old Town’s priorities are OT-3, OT-1, and then OT-4. As for base allocation, they will put $10,000 on OT-3, $10,000 on OT-1, and $5,000 on OT-4. Mr. Duke advised that Skyline Forest’s priorities are SF-3, SF-4, SF-2, and then CW-36. Ms. Morgan advised that Aguajito Oaks will place their entire base of $727 on FF- 3. Ms. Engell stated that Skyline Ridge cannot support SR-1 at $15,000. They will give their entire base allocation of $1,132 to MV-7. Ms. Hintze stated that Villa Del Monte’s priorities are VDM-3, VMD-2, and then VDM-5. As for base allocation, they will put $9,000 on VDM-2, $4,000 on CW-18, $1,000 on CW-8, $1,000 on CW-37, and $1,000 on MV-6. Mr. Krebs instructed committee to put base allocation and priorities on the voting sheets. He described the voting process and released the committee to vote. c Select Projects by Voting (Public Comment, Committee Comment, Vote, Tally) Round One 1. AM-2 72 points. $25,000 Base Allocation: MV $1,000 2. SF-3 63 points. $50,000 Base Allocation: MV $1,000 3. MV-7 50 points. $50,000 Base Allocation: SR $1,132 4. COK-4 48 points. $100,000 Base Allocation: None. 5. NM-7 48 points. $100,000 Base Allocation: None. Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 6 Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 6. DMG-3 47 points. $264,000 Base Allocation: DMG $7,822 7. COK-1 47 points. $30,000 Base Allocation: None. 8. FF-1 46 points. $25,000 Base Allocation: MV $1,000 FF $1,852 9. OT-3 39 points. $28,000 Base Allocation: OT $10,000 10 MV-6 30 points. $25,000 Base Allocation: MV $2,500 VDM $1,000 Mr. Krebs opened public comment before the second round of voting. Ellen McEwen spoke in support of CW-37 and CW-28. Tom Reeves spoke in support of DMG-1, CW-39, and CW-38. Mike Sovereign spoke in support of CW-3A and CW-35. Joe De Ruosi spoke in support of CW-35 and emphasized the importance of the project for Monterey’s history. As for CW-21B, he stated that they would like to revise the estimate and only ask for $200,000. Barbara Moore spoke in support of MV-9. Rebecca Perry of Monterey Vista thanked the committee for funding MV-6 and MV-7. She asked for support for the neighborhood’s number one priority. Steve Morton spoke in support of CW-16. Inga Waite responded to Ms. Dwight’s earlier comment regarding the location of the Library vault. She stated that they would be happy to consider an alternative location if that would gain support for the project. Charles Martin spoke in support of MV-10. Kevin Clement spoke in support of DMG-1 and CW-38. Richard Ruccello thanked the committee for funding Casanova Oak Knoll projects and spoke in support of DT-1, MV-1, NM-6, VDM-5, CW-5, CW-6, CW-8, CW-12, CW-16, CW-20B, CW-23, CW-24, and CW-31. Tom Rowley spoke in support of FF-3 and CW-31. Katrina Hintze spoke in support of VDM-5. Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 7 Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 Bryce Craft spoke against FF-3. He stated that he has tried to compromise with the project proponent, but he does not want the light in front of his house. Seeing no further comments, Mr. Krebs closed public comment. Mr. Heuer advised that there are four neighborhoods who have not received funding: Villa Del Monte, Deer Flats, Glenwood, and Oak Grove. He also stated that FF-3 is a controversial project and he does not want to fund a controversial project. He also spoke in support of AM-3. Mr. Brassfield agreed with Mr. Heuer regarding FF-3. He advised that Casanova Oak Knoll will put $500 base allocation on DT-1 and $4,511 on CW-31. Ms. Fields encouraged the committee to consider Citywide projects, especially CW-35, CW-31, and CW-36. She advised that Del Monte Beach will put $500 of their base allocation on CW-37 and $500 on CW-8. Ms. Venza spoke regarding the time limit on CW-12. She advised that Monterey Vista will put an additional $5,000 on MV-2, $1,000 on DMG-1, and will fully fund MV-1 with base allocation. Mr. Heuer made a motion to fully fund MV-1 with base allocation. Mr. Pagnillo seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. Mr. Duke asked for support for SF-4. He agreed with supporting AM-3, NM-20, CW-11, CW-31, CW-36, and CW-38. Ms. Morgan spoke in favor of FF-3. Ms. Hayter emphasized the importance of drainage and greenbelt projects. Ms. Pavlo spoke in support of VDM-5. Mr. Pagnillo advised that there was a proposed compromise for FF-3, but it significantly increased the cost because there is already a pole at the proposed location. Ms. Harrison reminded the committee that she has placed $10,000 of base allocation on OT-1. Ms. Alley, Ms. Engell, and Ms. Adam had no comment. Mr. Krebs began the second round of voting. Round Two 1. VDM-5 58 points. $80,000 Base Allocation: None. 2. CW-31 51 points. $64,000 Base Allocation: FF $1,000 DMB $500 COK $1,000 Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 8 Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 3. AM-3 49 points. $35,000 Base Allocation: None. 4. MV-2 41 points. $220,000 Base Allocation: MV $10,000 5. CW-16 39 points. $40,000 Base Allocation: COK $500 6. DT-1 37 points. $175,000 Base Allocation: DT All base 7. DMG-1 36 points. $26,000 Base Allocation: DMG $1,000 MV $1,000 8. CW-38 30 points. 370,000 Base Allocation: None. 9. CW-35 29 points. $350,000 Base Allocation: COK $500 10 CW-8 29 points. $40,000 Base Allocation: VDM $1,000 DMB $500 Mr. Krebs opened public comments for the third round of voting. Tom Reeves thanked the committee for funding CW-38. Mike Sovereign thanked the committee for funding CW-35 and asked for support for CW-3A. Diane Brady asked for support for NM-6. Barbara Moroe spoke in support of MV-9 and advised the committee that this project has overwhelming neighborhood support. Joe De Ruosi spoke in support of CW-6, CW-21A, and CW-21B. Dennis Copeland asked for support for CW-3A Charles Martin spoke in support of MV-10 and advised that the price has gone down to $24,000. Richard Ruccell asked the committee to emphasize each neighborhood’s priorities again and advised that base allocation can be used as a negotiating tool. He spoke in support of NM-16, CW-11, NM-20, CW-3A, CW-5, CW-6, CW-12, CW-23, and CW-28. Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 9 Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 Chief Panholzer thanked the committee for their support of the greenbelt projects. He asked for support for Fire Station 3 and emphasized the need for CW-20B. Inga Waite asked the committee to support the Library Board’s number one priority: CW-23. Kevin Clement thanked the committee for DMG-1 and CW-38. Lacy Spangler, Parks and Recreation Vice Chair, spoke in support of CW-37, NM- 20, and CW-28. Scott Connolly spoke in support of CW-34. Seeing no further comments, Mr. Krebs closed public comment. Mr. Heuer stated that CW-12 is critical. He spoke in support of OT-1, NM-20, CW- 3, CW-6, CW-20B, CW-21A, and CW-24. Ms. Venza advised that Monterey Vista will move $1,000 of their base allocation from DF-1 to CW-12 and $1,000 from OG-1 to CW-3A. She stated that their last priority is MV-9. Mr. Duke asked for support for SF-4 and supported CW-20 and MV-9. Ms. Morgan asked for support for FF-3. Ms. Dwight asked for support for NM-11, MV-9, NM-8, NM-21, NM-6, GW-1, CW- 3A, CW-4, OT-4, and CW-37. She advised that New Monterey will put their remaining base of $2,140 on CW-37. She stated that Deer Flats does not have a representative present, but their number one priority is DF-1. Ms. Hintze advised that Villa Del Monte will fully fund CW-18 with base allocation. Mr. Heuer made a motion to fully fund CW-18 with base allocation. Ms. Fields seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. Ms. Hintze spoke in favor of NM-6, GW-1, CW-6, CW- 12, CW-20B, and CW-34. She advised that VDM-2 will only cost $20,000 to fund and it is their priority. Mr. Pagnillo asked for support for FF-4. Ms. Harrison thanked the committee for funding OT-3. She asked for support for OT-1 and OT-4 and emphasized the base allocation she has given both of those projects. Ms. Baker and Ms. Engell asked for support for CW-19. Ms. Adams asked for support for OG-1. She advised that Oak Grove will put $1,000 on MV-9, $1,000 on CW-23, $1,000 on CW-24, $1,000 on OT-1, $2,000 on OG-1, and $6,000 on OG-2. Mr. Brassfield and Ms. Fields has no comment. Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 10 Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 Mr. Krebs began the third round of voting. Round Three 1. MV-9 63 points.$61,000 Base Allocation: MV $5,500 OG $1,000 2. CW-12 59 points. $89,000 Base Allocation: MV $3,500 3. CW-20B 52 points. $40,000 Base Allocation: COK $2,511 4. OT-1 51 points. $35,000 Base Allocation: OT $ 10,000 5. SF-4 48 points. $50,000 Base Allocation: SF $735 6. CW-3A 43 points. $213,000 Base Allocation: MV $1,000 7. NM-6 36 points. $25,000 Base Allocation: None. 8. CW-6 36 points. $35,000 Base Allocation: None. 9. OT-4 31 points. $31,000 Base Allocation: OT $5,000 10 CW-37 30 points. $8,000 Base Allocation: NM $2,140 11 CW-19 30 points. $25,000 Base Allocation: None. Mr. Krebs opened public comment for the fourth round of voting. Anne Brady thanked the committee for funding NM-6. Tom Reeves spoke in support of NM-20. Charles Martin spoke in support of MV-10 and advised that the price will go up next year. Dennis Copeland spoke in support of CW-23 and CW-3A. Ellen McEwen thanked the committee for funding CW-37 and asked for support for NM-20 and CW-28. Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 11 Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 Jennifer Bodensteiner spoke in support of CW-21A and CW-21B. Seeing no further comments, Mr. Krebs closed public comment. Mr. Heuer stated it would be nice to see projects funded in Deer Flats, Oak Grove, and Glenwood. He advised he will support GW-1, NM-20, CW-24, and CW-21A. Mr. Ruccello agreed that Deer Flats and Oak Grove deserve support. He spoke in support of NM-20. Ms. Fields asked if it would be less expensive if NM-20 and CW-28 were combined. Ms. McEwen stated she would be agreeable if it was a significant cost difference. Mr. Krebs advised that it would not make a significant difference. Ms. Dwight spoke in support of NM-11A and NM-11B, NM-8, NM-16, CW-11, GW- 1, and CW-4. Ms. Hintze asked for support for VDM-2 and reminded the committee that Villa Del Monte has put $10,000 of their base allocation on this project. Ms. Venza, Mr. Duke, Ms. Morgan, Mr. Pagnillo, Ms. Harrison, Ms. Baker, Ms. Engell, and Ms. Adam had no comment. Mr. Krebs began the fourth round of voting. Round Four 1. GW-1 92 points. $146,000 Base Allocation: GW $7,447 Mr. Heuer made a motion to move Glenwood’s base allocation of $7,447 to GW-1. Ms. Dwight seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. 2. CW-4 65 points. $29,000 Base Allocation: None. 3. OG-1 63 points. $20,000 Base Allocation: OG $12,315 4. VDM-2 60 points. $30,000 Base Allocation: VDM $8,680 MV $1,000 Cut off-projects: Mr. Krebs advised that DF-1 received partial funding. 5. DF-1 54 points.$177,000 Base Allocation: DF $3,382 Mr. Pagnillo made a motion to apply Deer Flat’s base allocation of $3,382 to Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 12 Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 DF-1. Ms Fields seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. 6. CW-21A 51 points. $23,000 Base Allocation: None. 7. CW-11 48 points. $40,000 Base Allocation: None. 8. NM-20 46 points. $80,000 Base Allocation: None. Ms. Dwight suggested spending remaining base allocation. Mr. Heuer stated remaining base allocation can roll over into next year. Mr. Brassfield advised that the money can be held for one cycle. Ms. Adam stated she will put Oak Grove’s remaining base allocation on OG-1. Mr. Duke advised that he will put his remaining base allocation of $735 on SF-4. Mr. Heuer made a motion to apply Downtown’s base to DT-2. Mr. Duke seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the thirteen representatives present. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS Rick Heuer said good night. Mike Brassfield thanked everyone for staying so late. Jayme Fields thanked everyone for making it work. Pat Venza thanked the committee and staff. Dennis Duke said thanks, good job. Olivia Morgan thanked staff for their hard work behind the scenes. Sharon Dwight thanked staff, committee, and public for their work. She advised that the committee will meet next to discuss the Policies and Procedures Manual. She suggested that he finance subcommittee follow up with staff to discuss whether CIP projects are billed the same as NIP projects. Katirina Hintze thanked the committee for funding VDM-2. Richard Pagnillo had no comment. April Harrison advised that an issue came up with a current NIP project in her neighborhood and it will need to be discussed at a later date. Kathleen Baker said goodnight. Julie Engell had no comment. Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 13 Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 Luz Adam said good night. NEXT MEETING 7. Special Meeting to be Scheduled as Needed ADJOURNMENT Mr. Krebs adjourned the meeting at 1:14 a.m. Respectfully Submitted, Approved, Sara Myers Jeff Krebs, P.E. Recording Secretary NIP Staff Coordinator Neighborhood Improvement Program Committee Meeting Minutes Wednesday, April 27, 2016 14

Agenda

NIP Committee Member listing at Neighborhood Improvement http://www.monterey.org/en- Program Committee Agenda us/cityhall/boardscommissions/ nipcommittee.aspx NIP Spokesperson Rick Heuer Sharon Dwight (Alternate) Wednesday, April 27, 2016 Richard Ruccello (Alternate) 7:00 PM NIP Staff Coordinator Monterey, California Jeff Krebs CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES PUBLIC COMMENTS INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS 1. Verify NIP Committee Participants Have Attended or Viewed All Four NIP Project Review Meetings 2. Explain the Voting Process 3. NIP Financial Report 4. Addressing Proposed Facility Projects with Accessibility Requirements NIP INFORMATIONAL REPORTS 5. NIP Spokesperson Reports PUBLIC APPEARANCE 6. Voting Process For FY 2016/17 NIP Program a Public Comment b NIP Representative Comment and Base Allocation Funding Requests (Fully Funded) c Select Projects by Voting (Public Comment, Committee Comment, Vote, Tally) COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS NEXT MEETING 7. Special Meeting to be Scheduled as Needed ADJOURNMENT Agenda packets may be reviewed by the public in the Engineering Office or on the web at http://www.monterey.org beginning 72 hours prior to the date of the meeting. Members of the public have the right to address the Committee on any Agenda items. The Staff Coordinator will formally open the floor for public comment. However, if you wish to speak to items during "Consent Agenda" or "Staff Informational Report," please advise the staff or the Coordinator prior to the action on that item and you will be recognized. Notification, as much in advance as possible, is appreciated. Information distributed to the Committee at the meeting becomes part of the public record. A copy of written material, pictures, etc. should be provided to the Secretary for this purpose. For more agenda information, call the Engineering Office at 831-646-3921. CITY OF MONTEREY'S 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES: Voicemail: 831-646-3799 FAX: 831-646-3793 Email: suggest@monterey.org WebPage: http://www.monterey.org The City of Monterey is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (831) 646- 3935. Notification 30 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. For communication-related assistance, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device. UPCOMING MEETINGS AT CITY HALL Apr 28 Disabled Access Appeals Board Meeting Cancellation, Council Chamber - 2:00 PM May 2 MP Regional Water Authority TAC Meeting, Council Chamber - 10:30 AM May 3 Council Regular Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM May 4 Architectural Review Committee Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm May 5 Zoning Administrator Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm May 10 Planning Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm May 12 Historic Preservation Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm May 12 MP Regional Water Authority Meeting, TBD - 7:00 PM May 17 Council Regular Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM May 18 Architectural Review Committee Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm May 19 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM May 19 Zoning Administrator Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm NIP Committee Agenda Wednesday, April 27, 2016 2 May 24 Planning Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm May 25 Oversight Board Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM May 25 Council Study Session, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM May 25 Library Board Meeting, Library Community Room - 5:00 PM May 30 Colton Hall Museum Cultural Art Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm Jun 1 Architectural Review Committee Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm Jun 2 Zoning Administrator Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm Jun 6 MP Regional Water Authority TAC Meeting, Council Chamber - 10:30 AM MORE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE BY CALLING 646-3921 NIP Committee Agenda Wednesday, April 27, 2016 3

Get email alerts for Monterey

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting