Planning Commission Meeting
Regular MeetingMonterey, CA · August 11, 2015
Minutes
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
4:00 pm - 5:30 pm
7:00 pm - 11:00 pm
580 PACIFIC STREET, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Commissioners Present:
Commissioners Absent: McCrone, Osorio, Davis, Garden, Stocker, Reed, Widmar
Staff Members Present:
FIELD TRIP
The Planning Commission will be conducting a field trip on Monday, August 10,
2015 to review the Tuesday, August 11, 2015 Planning Commission Agenda.
Date Posted: August 7, 2015
For more information please call (831) 646-3885.
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Osorio called the meeting to order at 4:02 pm.
CONSENT ITEMS
Commissioner Stocker made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda. Commissioner
McCrone seconded the motion. Vice Chair Reed abstained due to his absence from the
July 28, 2015 meeting.
On a motion by Commissioner Stocker, seconded by Commissioner McCrone, and
carried by the following vote, the Planning Commission approved the CONSENT ITEMS:
AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: McCrone, Osorio, Davis, Garden, Stocker, Widmar
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
RECUSED: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Reed
Approval of Minutes
1. July 28, 2015
ACTION: Approved as submitted.
***End of Consent Agenda***
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
PUBLIC HEARING
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, August 11, 2015
2. Consider 2222 North Fremont Street; Use Permit 15-135 for Retail Sales fronting Bruce
Lane; Applicant Cesar Canjura, MBH Architects; Owner Patricia S Work Tr Et Al; PC-NF
(Planned Community-North Fremont) Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA Requirements
ACTION: Adopted a Resolution approving Use Permit 15-135 for retail sales
fronting Bruce Lane at 2222 North Fremont Street with Conditions of Approval and
added Special Conditions of Approval.
Staff Presentation/Commissioner Questions
Fernanda Roveri presented the Agenda Report and answered Commissioner’s
questions. Kimberly Cole was also present and answered Commissioner’s
questions.
Applicant
Cesar Canjura, MBH Architects, introduced Michael Kouvaris, also of MBH
Architects, Ellia Karres on behalf of Dollar Tree, and Jerry Anderson on behalf of
the property owner. In response to Commissioner Widmar’s question, Mr. Canjura
said roof-mounting air the compressors would require roof modifications and is
not economically feasible. Regarding deliveries, Mr. Canjura said extending the
roller would cause inefficiencies and increase delivery times. Mr. Canjura said a
HVAC enclosure and a trash enclosure were created for noise mitigation, and a
spring-loaded door to prevent slamming will also help mitigate noise. In response
to Commissioner Garden’s question, Mr. Canjura said cardboard will be stored
inside the building and no open food items will go into the dumpster outside, just
pre-packaged items. Mr. Canjura deferred Commissioner McCrone’s question
regarding truck idling and Chair Osorio’s question regarding deliveries to Mr.
Karres.
Jerry Anderson, on behalf of property owner, said the parking layout plan has
been revised numerous times and that he hopes the PC will support the extra
parking proposed because it is a good thing given the neighborhood’s concern
with employee parking. He also said that the building cannot be moved at this
point in time to meet the N. Fremont Specific Plan guidelines, and that some
parking in front with the significant amount of landscaping proposed makes
sense. Mr. Anderson said the issue of truck deliveries was studied extensively
and that it is much easier to maneuver in reverse as proposed, given the site
layout. He also said the Dollar Tree has made numerous accommodations,
undergone an extraordinary amount of review, and will be good operator and
neighbor. Mr. Anerson asked PC to approve the applicant. In response to
Commissioner Garden’s question about the easement, Mr. Anderson said a
Memorandum of Lease will be a non-permanent solution to meet the need while
the tenant is there.
Ellia Karres, Dollar Tree, said the single most important thing for business is the
delivery trucks. He also said Swift Trucking is used and that the company has
very high standards for its drivers in order to maximize safety and prevent
lawsuits. Mr. Karres said the truck drivers test maneuverability of the site and that
the other maneuverability options tested were unsuccessful. Mr. Karres also said
deliveries generally take place twice a week on Tuesday and Friday and that Dollar
Tree tries not to do deliveries on weekends due to the added expense involved.
Planning Commission
2 Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
2
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, August 11, 2015
Mr. Karres said deliveries take two to three hours and the closer the truck can get
to the door, the better. He also said Dollar Tree does not generate trash like a
traditional retailer because they sell more stuff than they throw away. In response
to Commissioner McCrone’s question regarding truck idling, Mr. Karres said the
truck will be turned off when unloading. In response to Commissioner Stocker’s
question regarding why deliveries cannot be prevented entirely on the weekends,
Mr. Karres said weekend deliveries could be required to when a store sells out
unexpectedly of product. In response to Commissioner Widmar’s question, Mr.
Karres said employees will park onsite for safety reasons. In response to Chair
Osorio’s question, Mr. Karres said the lease is an initial 10 year lease.
Public Comments
Richard Ruccello, president of Casanova Oak Knoll Neighborhood Association
(CONA), thanked staff and the applicants for addressing most of the
neighborhood’s concerns. He also said that the application does in fact require a
use permit per the neighborhood plan because it is a commercial business
involving nighttime activity that is adjacent to residential neighborhoods. Mr.
Ruccello summarized the remaining concerns of the neighborhood which include
noise mitigation, truck idling, noise from refrigerated trucks’ compressors,
dumpster maintenance, and ensuring that shopping carts are picked up and are
not on Bruce Lane. Mr. Ruccello also asked that the PC does not cut down on the
proposed parking given the high volume nature of the store, and said that nothing
the neighborhood is requesting requires money, but just has to be added to the
use permit. In response to Chair Osorio’s question, Mr. Ruccello said the
neighborhood prefers 8:00 am deliveries over 7:00 am and that the closer the
delivery rollers are the better. In response to Commissioner Stocker’s question,
Mr. Ruccello said a few weekend deliveries would not hurt but the neighborhood
does not want it to be a habit.
Jim Nichols said he lives behind the proposed location for Dollar Tree and asked
what leverage the City will have to fine the applicant if there is an abundance of
shopping carts, if the delivery times are abused, or if there is noise from idling
engines or air compressors. He also said that the business owners should
responsible for sweeping up their front door and area around the store. Mr.
Nichols said he does not have any overwhelming concerns, but would like to see
that the permit approval is limited to the Dollar Tree use and that the business is
monitored.
Mike Brassfield, chairman of CONA, said that the reduction of parking in the front
of the building goes along with the spirit of the North Fremont Specific Plan and
said the neighborhood welcomes their buildings being occupied. He also
expressed concern regarding car accidents if the chain link fence is removed and
suggested a curb or a barrier be installed. Mr. Brassfield said he supports the
proposed garbage receptacles having lids. He also said the project does need a
use permit and that use permit helps bring issues that may arise to the manager.
Mr. Brassfield said the neighborhood wants to work with Dollar Tree and asked for
the Planning Commission’s support on the three conditions proposed by the
neighborhood – no idling of truck engines, no weekend deliveries, and maintaining
the carts and the store’s exterior.
Planning Commission
3 Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
3
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, August 11, 2015
Jennifer Nichols said she lives behinds proposed Dollar Tree and asked if a
decibel meter will be secured to the building and how residents can address noise
issues when the noise is over the decibel limit. She also said she would like
something in writing stating that action will be taken by Dollar Tree when decibels
exceed the allowed levels. Ms. Nichols said that the neighboring carwash already
exceeds allowed decibels and the decibel level of the Dollar Tree and the carwash
combined concerns her.
Michael Schoeder, DTZ Commercial Real Estate, said he has had the privilege and
the challenge of working with the site for the past five years. He said he has had
numerous offers and has been in escrow before on the site. Mr. Schoeder also
said Dollar Tree would appreciate occasional weekend deliveries.
Michael Kouvaris, MBH Architects, said about three years ago a Dollar Tree store
moved into his community and they have been a good neighbor. Mr. Kouvaris
said Dollar Tree has listened to planning staff and comments and wants to be a
good neighbor. Mr. Kouvaris said he hopes the permit is approved.
Ms. Cole addressed the issue of noise monitoring and said there will not be a
decibel meter secured on site, but if the City receives a complaint the police
department can bring noise monitors out to take a reading. She also said the CNL
noise standards measure an average of sounds and that the City aims to address
the sound issue on a programmatic level as opposed to monitoring each sound.
In response to Commissioner Garden’s question, Ms. Cole said that use permits
are enforceable and if enough violations occur the use permit can come before the
Planning Commission for review and possibly added Conditions of Approval or
revocation.
Chair Osorio asked about noise standards.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Stocker said he does not like the buildings being empty and
looking abandoned. He also said the use permit process is beneficial because it
opens a discussion between the applicant, the community and staff.
Commissioner Stocker said the extra parking is important, the delivery
configuration is a good solution, and that the sound mitigation around the
equipment and the covered trash enclosure are good. Commissioner Stocker also
said he recommends no weekend deliveries, but supports the 7:00 am delivery
time.
Commissioner McCrone said the more specific the use permit is the easier it is to
enforce, and that there should be Conditions of Approval added regarding engine
idling, trash and cart cleanup, and the trash enclosure. Commissioner McCrone
said he is troubled by the parking at the front of the building and would like it all
removed to upgrade North Fremont and be in keeping with the North Fremont
Specific Plan. He also said the removal of the chain link fence needs to be
addressed in the use permit and that there should be some sort of barrier to
prevent car accidents.
Commissioner Garden agreed that more attention is needed regarding the fence
Planning Commission
4 Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
4
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, August 11, 2015
and said it cannot just be removed without addressing the grade issue. He also
said the spaces in front of the store should be removed to improve the pedestrian
experience and remove the strip mall look. He suggested that the applicant submit
an employee parking plan. Regarding truck maneuvering, Commissioner Garden
said it appears that the proposal is workable.
Commissioner Garden made a motion to continue the application to August 25,
2015 with direction to the applicant to remove parking from the front of the
building to improve the look and pedestrian experience and to rethink the work at
the back of the building to allow trucks to come and go without the chain link
fence.
Widmar began discussion on the motion and said he does not see the need for
continuance of the project and does not support the motion. Regarding the
delivery trucks, Commissioner Widmar said it needs to be clear that the trucks’
engines will not idle but that a separate refrigeration unit on the truck will run for
frozen items. Regarding parking in the front of the building he said reducing the
parking to four spaces in the front with landscaping is an improvement and a step
in the right direction, and that those four spaces are need for employees and peak
times.
Vice Chair Reed said he does not support the motion for continuance. He also
said the proposed parking is an improvement, but not enough of an improvement.
Vice Chair Reed said in accordance with the North Fremont Specific Plan the
building should be brought forward and the parking should be in the back, but that
the proposed parking is an acceptable compromise for now.
Chair Osorio said he does not agree with a continuance of the project. He also
said that the site is a critical spot to implement the North Fremont Specific Plan,
even if it means removal of parking, and that 10 years is a long time to wait to
begin implementation of the Plan. Chair Osorio said the delivery times need to be
considered carefully because people may be awake at 7:00 am, but the noise of
the deliveries will still be disturbing.
Commissioner McCrone said he would like to only allow two weekend deliveries
per year and that his main concern is what will be done about the huge drop off
behind the store. In response to Chair Osorio’s question, Ms. Cole confirmed no
improvements are proposed for the area other than removing the fence.
Commissioner Stocker said the Resolution could specify that a safety device will
be installed.
Commissioner Garden said the North Fremont Specific Plan has the goal of
creating 12 foot wide sidewalks and now is a good time to think about
implementation of this goal and the possibility of having an employee parking
plan.
Ms. Cole asked the applicants if they could provide revised plans to the Planning
Office in time to return before the Planning Commission at the August 25, 2015
meeting. Mr. Anderson said if it is a simple barrier being requested by the
Planning Commission, yes, but it depends on the design.
Planning Commission
5 Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
5
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, August 11, 2015
UNDERLINED MOTION HERE
1st: Garden
2nd: McCrone
Yes: Garden, McCrone
No: Widmar, Reed, Osorio, Stocker
Absent:
Recused: Davis
The motion failed.
Commissioner Stocker said he understands the concern with removing the
parking in front, and said if parking spot #1 was removed it would be a huge
improvement and allow for more planting. He also said it would be a mistake to
remove extra parking for a high volume business. Commissioner Stocker said a
Condition of Approval stating that a barrier acceptable to the proper City official is
installed could be added to address the concern regarding the back of the store.
Commissioner Stocker made a motion to adopt a Resolution approving Use Permit
15-135 for retail sales fronting Bruce Lane at 2222 North Fremont Street with
Conditions of Approval and added Special Conditions of Approval as follows:
4. That the applicant replace compact parking space #4, shown on Exhibit B,
with landscaping.
5. That the property owner prepare an employee parking plan for Planning
Office approval.
6. That the applicant shall modify the plans to show a safety barrier to replace
the chain link fence for City approval.
7. That weekend truck deliveries will be limited to two days per year.
8. That the HVAC unit enclosure be constructed according to the
recommended noise attenuation measures in Exhibit A.
9. That delivery trucks not idle their engine.
10. That Dollar Tree maintain the store’s exterior clean and keep shopping carts
on-site.
Commissioner Widmar suggested allowing six to eight deliveries a year, especially
in the first year. Commissioner Stocker said he prefers only two times per year.
Commissioner Garden said two times per year seems like plenty given the
warehouse space in the building.
Chair Osorio said he is not convinced that just removing one space is enough and
that a ten years is a long time to wait to start implementing the North Fremont
Specific Plan.
UNDERLINED MOTION HERE
Planning Commission
6 Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
6
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, August 11, 2015
On a motion by Commissioner Stocker, seconded by Commissioner Garden, and carried
by the following vote, the Planning Commission adopted a Resolution approving Use
Permit 15-135 for retail sales fronting Bruce Lane at 2222 North Fremont Street with
Conditions of Approval and added Special Conditions of Approval:
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: McCrone, Garden, Stocker, Reed, Widmar
NOES: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Osorio
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
RECUSED: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Davis
3. Consider 600 Irving Avenue; Use Permit 15-261 Extension of Permits 08-361 and 11-
188; Applicants/Property Owners Eugene and Melahat Strangio; R-3-5 Zoning District;
Exempt from CEQA Requirements
ACTION: Adopted a Resolution approving Use Permit 15-261 extension of Permits
08-361 and 11-188 for a new two-story five unit apartment building located at 600
Irving Avenue with Conditions of Approval and amended Special Conditions of
Approval.
Staff Presentation/Commissioner Questions
Kimberly Cole presented the Agenda Report and answered Commissioner’s
questions.
Applicant
Applicant was present but did not address the Planning Commission.
Public Comments
None.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner McCrone said he does not support an extension to a date uncertain
because the permit could be open indefinitely and he supports bringing back the
permit every four years on the Consent Agenda.
In response to Commissioner Garden’s question, Ms. Cole said the Monterey
Peninsula Water District will tell the City when water is available and the City will
go through the allocation process.
Commissioner Stocker said he has the same concern with granting an extension
to a date uncertain, especially since ordinances can change over time. He said he
supports a four year extension of the project.
In response to Commissioner Stocker’s question, Ms. Cole said the main issue is
that the applicant does not want to pay the extension fee continually and that he
approached the City Council for a fee waiver, paid out of the General Fund, but
was denied.
Commissioner Garden asked about a Condition of Approval for automatic renewal.
Planning Commission
7 Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
7
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, August 11, 2015
Vice Chair Reed asked if a Condition for automatic renewal is not essentially the
same thing as approving the permit to a date uncertain. Commissioner McCrone
said he does not support the idea of a Condition of automatic renewal.
Commissioner Stocker made a motion to adopt a Resolution approving Use Permit
15-261 extension of Permits 08-361 and 11-188 for a new two-story five unit
apartment building located at 600 Irving Avenue with Conditions of Approval and
amended Special Conditions of Approval as follows:
7. This approval will expire four years from the date of approval by the
Planning Commission. It is the applicant’s responsibility to track the
expiration date and any request for extension must be made a minimum of
60 days prior to expiration. No renewal notice will be sent to the applicant
or property owner.
Commissioner Widmar seconded the motion.
On a motion by Commissioner Stocker, seconded by Commissioner Widmar, and carried
by the following vote, the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution approving Use
Permit 15-261 extension of Permits 08-361 and 11-188 for a new two-story five unit
apartment building located at 600 Irving Avenue with Conditions of Approval and
amended Special Conditions of Approval:
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: McCrone, Osorio, Stocker, Reed, Widmar
NOES: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Davis, Garden
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS
None.
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
4. Planning Office Update.
Update received
Ms. Cole confirmed that there will be a Planning Commission meeting on August
25, 2015.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:20 pm.
Planning Commission
8 Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
8
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, August 11, 2015
Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Kimberly Cole, AICP Chair
Principal Planner Planning Commission
Planning Commission
9 Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
9
Agenda
Planning Commission
Agenda
Commissioners
Luis Osorio, Chair
AFTERNOON SESSION Hansen Reed, Vice Chair
ONLY Paul W. Davis
Leon Garden
Tuesday, August 11, 2015 Willard McCrone
580 Pacific Street David Stocker
Council Chambers 4:00 pm – 6:00 pm Ralph Widmar
Monterey, California
FIELD TRIP
The Planning Commission will be conducting a field trip on Monday, August 10, 2015 to
review the Tuesday, August 11, 2015 Planning Commission Agenda.
Date Posted: August 7, 2015 For more information please call (831) 646-3885.
CALL TO ORDER
CONSENT ITEMS
CONSENT ITEMS allow for a review of those items recommended for approval on consent or
recommended to be continued, tabled or withdrawn, etc. Consent items consist of those items
which are routine and for which a staff recommendation has been prepared. A member of the
public or a Commissioner may request that an item recommended for approval on consent be
heard on the regular agenda for further discussion.
Approval of Minutes
1. July 28, 2015
***End of Consent Agenda***
PUBLIC COMMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS. At this time, the public may speak for a maximum of three minutes on any
subject which is within the jurisdiction of the Monterey Planning Commission and which is not on
the agenda. Any person or group desiring to bring an item to the attention of the Commission may
do so during Public Comments or by addressing a letter of explanation to the Commission, City
Hall, Monterey, CA 93940. Public Comments are taken during the afternoon session and
continued at the evening session. Individuals may choose to speak once for up to three minutes at
either session, but not both.
PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC HEARINGS are required by law for certain actions. You are welcome to offer your
comments after being recognized by the Chair. The Chair may limit the time allocated to each
speaker. Project representation is encouraged.
2. Consider 2222 North Fremont Street; Use Permit 15-135 for Retail Sales fronting
Bruce Lane; Applicant Cesar Canjura, MBH Architects; Owner Patricia S Work Tr Et
Al; PC-NF (Planned Community-North Fremont) Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA
Requirements
3. Consider 600 Irving Avenue; Use Permit 15-261 Extension of Permits 08-361 and 11-
188; Applicants/Property Owners Eugene and Melahat Strangio; R-3-5 Zoning
District; Exempt from CEQA Requirements
COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS
COMMISSIONERS may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or make a
brief report on his or her activities. In addition, a Commissioner may provide a referral to staff or
other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to the body at a subsequent
meeting concerning any City matter, or direct staff to place a request to agendize a matter of
business on a future agenda. (G.C. 54954.2)
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS supply information on activities or
announcements and may request clarification or direction regarding the scheduling of meetings
and study sessions.
4. Planning Office Update.
ADJOURNMENT
ADJOURNMENT — The general policy of the Planning Commission is that the Afternoon Session will
end no later than 5:30 p.m. and the Evening Session will end no later than 11:00 p.m. Any public
agenda items that have not been completed within the designated adjournment time may be formally
extended by the Commission, or continued to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission
Meeting, or continued to a Special Meeting.
Agenda packets may be reviewed by the public in the Monterey Public Library, in the Planning Office,
or on the web at http://www.monterey.org beginning late Friday afternoon prior to the date of the
meeting.
Members of the public have the right to address the Commission on any Agenda items. The Chair will
formally open the floor for public comment. However, if you wish to speak to items during "Consent
Agenda" or "Staff Informational Report," please advise the staff or the Chair prior to the action on that
item and you will be recognized. Notification as much in advance as possible is appreciated.
Information distributed to the Commission at the meeting becomes part of the public record. A copy of
written material, pictures, etc. should be provided to the Secretary for this purpose.
Planning Commission decisions may be appealed within ten (10) days from the date of the decision on
forms available in the Planning Division during business hours. When the tenth day falls on a weekend
or a holiday, the appeal deadline date is the next working day following the holiday or weekend. An
appeal fee will apply. For more agenda information, call the Planning Office at (831) 646-3885.
Planning Commission Meetings are cable cast live and videotaped for replay on Monterey's
Government Access Channel 25 by Access Monterey Peninsula (AMP).
CITY OF MONTEREY'S 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES:
Voicemail: (831) 646-3799
FAX: (831) 646-3793
Email: suggest@monterey.org
WebPage: http://www.monterey.org
The City of Monterey is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs
and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special
assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (831) 646-
3935. Notification 30 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title
II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. For communication-related
assistance, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS
offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7
days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use
CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device.
Planning Commission
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
2
UPCOMING MEETINGS AT CITY HALL
Aug 13 Historic Preservation Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Aug 13 MP Regional Water Authority Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM
Aug 18 Council Regular Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
Aug 19 Architectural Review Committee Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Aug 20 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM
Aug 20 Zoning Administrator Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Aug 24 Colton Hall Museum Cultural Art Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Aug 25 Planning Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Aug 26 Oversight Board Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM
Aug 26 Council Study Session, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
Aug 26 Library Board Meeting, Library Community Room - 5:00 PM
Sep 1 Council Regular Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
Sep 2 Architectural Review Committee Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Sep 3 Zoning Administrator Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Sep 8 Planning Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Sep 10 Historic Preservation Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Sep 15 Council Regular Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
Sep 16 Architectural Review Committee Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Sep 17 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM
Sep 17 Zoning Administrator Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
MORE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE BY CALLING 646-3885
Planning Commission
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
3
Get email alerts for Monterey
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.