Planning Commission Meeting
Regular MeetingMonterey, CA · September 8, 2015
Minutes
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, September 8, 2015
4:00 pm - 5:30 pm
7:00 pm - 11:00 pm
580 PACIFIC STREET, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Commissioners Present: Davis, Garden, Reed, Widmar, Fletcher, Millich, Dawson
Commissioners Absent: None
Staff Members Present: Principal Planner Kimberly Cole, Principal Planner Elizabeth
Caraker, Senior Planner Christy Hopper, Associate Planner
Fernanda Roveri, Recording Secretary Alicia Salas
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Reed called the meeting to order at 4:00 pm.
CONSENT ITEMS
Commissioner Garden made a motion to approve the minutes of August 11, 2015
and the minutes of August 25, 2015. Commissioner Widmar seconded the motion.
Commissioners Dawson, Millich, and Fletcher abstained from voting on item #1, the
minutes of August 11, 2015, due to absence from the meeting.
On a motion by Commissioner Garden, seconded by Commissioner Widmar, and
carried by the following vote, the Planning Commission approved the CONSENT
ITEMS:
AYES: 7 COMMISSIONERS: Davis, Garden, Reed, Widmar, Dawson (abstained
from item #1), Milich (abstained from item #1),
Fletcher (abstained from item #1)
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
Approval of Minutes
1. August 11, 2015
ACTION: Approved as submitted.
2. August 25, 2015
ACTION: Approved as submitted.
***End of Consent Agenda***
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
PUBLIC APPEARANCE
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, September 8, 2015
3. Election of Officers and Appointments to Subcommittees
ACTION: Approved Vice-Chair Reed as the new Chair and Commissioner Fletcher
as Vice Chair.
Staff Presentation/Commissioner Questions
Kim Cole presented the Agenda Report and answered Commissioners’ questions.
Public Comments
None.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Millich made a motion to appoint Vice-Chair Reed to the position of Chair
and appoint Commissioner Fletcher as Vice-Chair. Commissioner Dawson seconded
the motion.
Ms. Cole advised that action on the appointments to the subcommittees may need to
wait as there was a letter received just prior to the meeting from Old Monterey Business
Association and they have asked for this item to be delayed so that the association may
consider the issue at their next meeting.
Ms. Cole said that various committees could be eliminated because the work with those
committees had been completed. She also said that the Old Monterey Business
Association and the North Fremont Business Association have both a staff member and
a Commissioner assigned. Ms. Cole said she thought that by removing Commissioners
from those associations it would help reduce their workload.
Commissioner Widmar asked if the subcommittees will go away. Ms. Cole said no and
again stated that she thought it would help reduce the workload. She also said that more
committees will be coming with the Local Coastal Plan in the future. Commissioner
Widmar asked if the other various subcommittees with the members of the ARC and
HPC will be going away as well. Ms. Cole said yes since the work on those
subcommittees is done she would recommend the same to those subcommittees as well.
Commissioner Garden asked Ms. Cole to explain how members that were appointed by
the City Council to the Waterfront Master Plan could be removed by the Planning
Commission. Ms. Cole said she will follow up on that question and said that this topic
should be continued in order for her to research that answer.
Commissioner Davis asked if contact would be made with the North Fremont Business
Association as well. Ms. Cole said she will reach out to North Fremont Business
Association to find out their input and bring back the information requested by
Commissioner Garden at the next Planning Commission meeting.
On a motion by Commissioner Millich and seconded by Commissioner Dawson, and
carried by the following vote, the Planning Commission approved Vice-Chair Reed as the
new Chair and approved Commissioner Fletcher as Vice-Chair:
AYES: 7 COMMISSIONERS: Davis, Garden, Reed, Widmar Millich,
Dawson, Fletcher
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, September 8, 2015
2
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, September 8, 2015
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
PUBLIC HEARING
Commissioner Fletcher recused himself from items #4 and 5, as he previously voted on
them as a Historic Preservation Commissioner, and left the room.
4. Consider 1008 West Franklin Street; HP Application 15-243 for H-2 Historic Zoning;
Applicant/Owner Teresa Hanna; R-1-6 Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA
Requirements
ACTION: Adopted a Resolution recommending that the City Council adopt an
Ordinance to rezone the property as a City Historic Resource from R-1-
6 to R-1-6-H-2.
Staff Presentation/Commissioner Questions
Christy Hopper presented Agenda Report and answered Commissioners’ questions.
Applicant
No applicant present.
Public Comments
None.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Widmar made a motion to adopt a Resolution recommending that the City
Council adopt an Ordinance to rezone the property as a City Historic Resource from R-1-
6 to R-1-6-H-2. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion.
On a motion by Commissioner Widmar and seconded by Commissioner Davis, and
carried by the following vote, the Planning Commission adopted a Resolution
recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance to rezone the property as a City
Historic Resource from R-1-6 to R-1-6-H-2:
AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Davis, Garden, Reed, Widmar, Millich,
Dawson
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
RECUSED: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Fletcher
5. Consider 138 Seafoam Avenue; HP Application 15-227 for H-2 Historic Zoning;
Applicant/Owner Carol Harpster; R-1-6-D1 Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA
Requirements
ACTION: Adopted a Resolution recommending that the City Council adopt an
Ordinance to rezone the property as a City Historic Resource from R-1-
6-D1 to R-1-6-H-2.
Staff Presentation/Commissioner Questions
Fernanda Roveri presented Agenda Report and answered Commissioners’ questions.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, September 8, 2015
3
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, September 8, 2015
Applicant
No applicant present.
Public Comments
None
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Dawson said he was a member of the ARC when they first approved the
addition to the back of the house and said they were all very excited to be up close to
this house as they thought it was a good example of mid-century modernism. He said he
is glad that the owner is applying for Mills Act in order to keep the house the same way.
Commissioner Widmar made a motion to adopt a Resolution recommending that the City
Council adopt an Ordinance to rezone the property as a City Historic Resource from R-1-
6-D1 to R-1-6-H-2. Commissioner Dawson seconded the motion.
On a motion by Commissioner Widmar and seconded by Commissioner Dawson, and
carried by the following vote, the Planning Commission adopted a Resolution
recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance to rezone the property as a City
Historic Resource from R-1-6-D1 to R-1-6-H-2:
AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Davis, Garden, Reed, Widmar, Millich, Dawson
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
RECUSED: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Fletcher
PUBLIC APPEARANCE
6. Training on Appeals
Ms. Cole presented a slide show regarding training on appeals.
Chair Reed adjourned the afternoon session at 4:30 p.m.
RECONVENE
***Evening Session Agenda***
7:00 -11:00 p.m.
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
PUBLIC APPEARANCE
7. Receive Report on Waterfront Master Plan; Receive Public Comment and Hold
Discussion
Staff Presentation/Commissioner Questions
Elizabeth Caraker presented the Agenda Report and answered Commissioners’
questions.
Public Comments
Bob Manix, the representative for the Ke Kai O’Uhane Outrigger Canoe Club, a nonprofit
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, September 8, 2015
4
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, September 8, 2015
membership club, said they store and base their operation just east of the Monterey Bay
Kayak building. He said he is concerned that when Monterey Bay Kayak building is
moved according to the plan; they will get lost in the move. He said they are asking to be
considered when adopting this plan.
Mary Alice Cerrito Fettis said please remember the waterfront parking lot and please give
it much consideration. She said that she likes the plan that was presented by Henry
Ruhnke back in November of last year to the City Council. She went on to say that this
was another option to what is being presented, it is not in disagreement. Ms. Cerrito
Fettis said she likes the idea of one ticket for each parking lot and each class of vehicle
coming in without regards to time. She said the bicyclists are in competition with
pedestrian and would encourage not widening the bike trail too much as it could become
a dangerous situation with speeding bicyclist versus the casual walking pedestrian. She
said additional, larger restrooms are needed at the Stanton Center and at the
Harbormaster’s Office.
Mark McKeller, a resident of the Del Monte Townhomes, asked if the projects B1A, B1B,
D3D, and D3E have timelines, because they want to start preparing for those projects.
Commissioner Comments
Ms. Caraker said the Parks and Recreation Commission will be focusing on the open
space area, Monterey Bay Park area, and the east side in particular. She said this will
coincide with Parks and Recreation Master Plan and have some overlapping in the
Waterfront Master Plan. She went on to say the Waterfront Master Plan is more general
and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan will address in more detail those particular
projects within that plan. She went on to say it is hard to say when implementation f the
Plan could happen. Chair Reed asked if it is fair to say not within the next 1-5 years.
Ms. Caraker agreed with Chair Reed and stated that, in particular, the east side of Park
Avenue will require a lot of funding to acquire the properties. She said that she has been
looking for grant opportunities with MST in order to move forward with that part of the
project and to have a bus rapid transit utilize that area.
Commissioner Davis asked if there was a specific time and schedule to any of those
projects. Ms. Caraker said capital has been difficult to find because so much is required
and if grants become available next year, then maybe we can move forward.
Commissioner Garden asked Ms. Caraker to address concerns of the Fisherman’s Wharf
Association. Ms. Caraker said the restroom improvements have been addressed at
Wharf #2, the Harbormaster’s Office, and at the east end of Monterey Bay Park.
Commissioner Garden asked what the timeline is if the projects are there and ready with
regards to parking, when those projects will get started. Ms. Caraker said it could be
years before that gets started but she also stated there will still be parking that is close to
the Wharf. Commissioner Garden said when parking availability is shown to be
inadequate, there is a project that will address that issue. Ms. Caraker said that the
Community Services Department is trying to move forward with the reconfiguration of the
parking lot with the curb stops; it could happen sooner rather later.
Commissioner Garden asked if the uncoordinated management of the parking operation
is being worked on as part of the Parking Master Plan. He went on to ask Ms. Caraker if
the Parking Master Plan was in progress. Ms. Caraker said the parking study had
outlined a number of different programs which have been integrated into the Downtown
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, September 8, 2015
5
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, September 8, 2015
Specific Plan, the North Fremont Specific Plan and the Waterfront Master Plan,
specifically tandem parking and valet parking, to increase the capacity at the existing lot.
She said the study also identified the capacity of the Custom House garages and trying
to improve circulation in and out of those garages. She also mentioned the shuttle
services for people who park at the Custom House garages that help deliver people who
park in those garage to the Wharf and other locations around the waterfront.
Commissioner Garden said the goal of the subcommittee was to work with staff and to
use the public comments and integrate them into the plan and said he feels happy with
where the plan is today. He said he supports the plan. Commissioner Garden said this
plan is mostly City owned property and is a plan for the future. He said he was
disappointed to see that the latest draft did not appear anywhere else than in the
Planning Commission packet, but he said he is very happy with the draft.
Commissioner Dawson said we have come a long way from the workshops and feels this
step is a very big step to help getting this done.
Commissioner Garden said the triangle of land at Lighthouse and Foam Avenue should
be included in the Lighthouse Area Specific Plan and excluded from the boundaries of
the Waterfront Master Plan. Commissioner Garden said there are a few parcels that are
private property, like Monterey Bay Urgent Care and said no determination has been
made as to what we are going to do with the bits of private property within the plan. He
also asked for more clarity regarding wharf leases that are on City owned property and
specifically what do they lease at the two Wharfs. He said a little more information on
that subject would be beneficial. He said there was no mention in the Standards of a
history boat at Wharf #2 for public visitation, yet the citizens’ and visitors of Monterey
have said it is something they want at Wharf #2. He went on to say there was mention of
sport fishing either. Commissioner Garden said he wanted to see the project that would
increase the size of the marina and extending the existing extension for one or two more
piers; that project is not mention either.
Commissioner Davis asked to mention outrigger canoes in D.3.h. He also said he likes
that there is a plan, that if and when parking is needed a plan will be available.
Commissioner Dawson said wayfinding is going to save our city. He said the wayfinding
signs will help people to the garages and avoid the tunnel.
Commissioner Garden said the integral part of the plan is the Tyler Street bridge and he
likes the solutions for circulation and feels that it is a good plan.
Commissioner Fletcher asked how long is this document expected to be relevant. Ms.
Caraker said probably more than 20 years. Commissioner Fletcher said he believes that
there is not enough language and substance in this area of implementation. Ms. Caraker
said this is a living documents and they will continually be updated.
Commissioner Garden said the reason for the vague details in the implementation
section, is because there is a section that says the users will pay for the improvements to
the park and what would be ok if we are talking about a gazebo but the City is looking at
the long range budget discussion and implementation of the Capital Improvement
Program for the entire City. He went on to say this looks like a large list but the Capital
Improvements Project is much larger. He said a study session for the Planning
Commissioner on how the CIP list comes together and how it gets done would be a good
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, September 8, 2015
6
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, September 8, 2015
idea. He said it would be a good agenda item if both staff and the Chair agree.
Commissioner Widmar said this plan has taken a lot of time and hard work. He said
there was great feedback with many drafts and edits and staff has done a terrific job.
Commissioner Widmar said things change and they have changed even from last year
when we looked at this last and people’s opinions change too. He said people will likely
use a shuttle or bus service if it is provided. He said first time visitors are more likely to
use the service to avoid driving in an unfamiliar place. He said we have to be forward
thinking. He went on to say that we have to utilize technology when referring to
wayfinding and how to implement some of these ideas and integrate them with smart
phone technology.
Chair Reed said he would like language in the document that directs the City of Monterey
that any leases should conform to the Waterfront Master Plan. He said there are two
references to the Light Rail that is part of TAMC and is in the future but it should be
noted that the citizens of Monterey have said they do not want it. He commented on the
garages in that they are not part of this plan and really belong in the Downtown Specific
Plan. He said that when you read the Waterfront Master Plan it sounds as if they are
designated for that area and when you read the Downtown Specific Plan it reads as if
they are for Downtown. He stated that some additional language stating that these
garages are for both areas would be good to outline. He said parking diagrams would be
good to show the plan area so you can see what lots fall within the area. He also said it
would be good to show the difference between publicly owned lots and private lots.
Commissioner Garden asked if the conclusions from the parking study should be in the
Plan. Commissioner Reed said he thinks its ok that they are not in the Plan. Ms.
Caraker said we have the study and we could always refer to it when needed.
Commissioner Reed ask if under the temporary use, could we ask that temporary use
chain link fencing should be wrapped so we don’t see the fencing.
In response to Chair Reed’s question about temporary chain link fencing, Ms. Caraker
said it was an interesting discussion at the ARC meeting and those edits will be in the
next draft, and said she was hesitant to make those changes until Planning Commission
gave their approval. She said the ARC encouraged the Planning Commissioners to
continue the conversation on whether or not fencing not visible from the public right-of-
way would be appropriate.
Commissioner Reed said that S.2.1 states that obstruction of the bay shall not be
permitted and asked what the standard is and where is that measured from. Ms.
Caraker said it refers back to the Local Coastal Program which defines views and view
cones.
Commissioner Garden asked when the next draft will be ready. Ms. Caraker said the
following week.
COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS
Commissioner Garden said a Dropbox account that is maintained by Commissioner
Widmar is available for the use by both staff and the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Widmar recommended that the City start using Dropbox and thought that
it might be a good topic for discussion. Commissioner Widmar also welcomed the new
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, September 8, 2015
7
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, September 8, 2015
Planning Commissioners.
Commissioner Garden said he was reminded that no communication should go through
staff and rather should go through the City Manager’s office. He said he would like to
have the Chair and staff agendized an invitation to the City Manager to come to a
Planning Commission meeting for an introduction.
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
8. Planning Office Update
Report received. Ms. Cole gave an update on the tentative agenda for the
Planning Commission Meeting of September 22, 2015.
Ms. Cole said the City was awarded a $250,000.00 grant from the California
Coastal Commission and Ocean Protection Council to update the Local Coastal
Plan and EMC Planning Group was hired for the job.
She also said an update to the Downtown Specific Plan was approved by Council
last week.
In response to Commissioner Garden’s comment, Ms. Cole said opinions and
suggestions regarding meeting times should be forwarded to Hans Uslar for
further discussion.
Ms. Cole said the Lighthouse Specific Area Plan will be introduced to the ARC
next week and then to the Planning Commission in October to ask for
authorization to prepare the environmental document. Commissioner Garden
reminded Ms. Cole that a decision regarding circulation in the Lighthouse Specific
Area Plan needs to go before other boards and commissions as well.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:43 pm.
Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Kimberly Cole, AICP Chair
Principal Planner Planning Commission
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, September 8, 2015
8
Agenda
Planning Commission
Commissioners
Agenda
Hansen Reed, Vice Chair
Paul W. Davis
Regular Meeting Mike Dawson
Daniel Fletcher
Tuesday, September 8, 2015 Leon Garden
Stephen Millich
580 Pacific Street 4:00 pm - 5:30 pm Ralph Widmar
Council Chambers 7:00 pm - 11:00 pm
Monterey, California
FIELD TRIP
The Planning Commission will not be conducting a field trip on Friday September 4, 2015
to review the Tuesday, September 8, 2015 Planning Commission Agenda.
(In observance of Labor Day the City offices will be closed Monday, September 7, 2015.)
Date Posted: September 3, 2015
For more information, please call (831) 646-3885.
***Afternoon Session Agenda***
4:00 - 5:30 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
CONSENT ITEMS
CONSENT ITEMS allow for a review of those items recommended for approval on consent or
recommended to be continued, tabled or withdrawn, etc. Consent items consist of those items
which are routine and for which a staff recommendation has been prepared. A member of the
public or a Commissioner may request that an item recommended for approval on consent be
heard on the regular agenda for further discussion.
Approval of Minutes
1. August 11, 2015
2. August 25, 2015
***End of Consent Agenda***
PUBLIC COMMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS. At this time, the public may speak for a maximum of three minutes on any
subject which is within the jurisdiction of the Monterey Planning Commission and which is not on
the agenda. Any person or group desiring to bring an item to the attention of the Commission may
do so during Public Comments or by addressing a letter of explanation to the Commission, City
Hall, Monterey, CA 93940. Public Comments are taken during the afternoon session and
continued at the evening session. Individuals may choose to speak once for up to three minutes at
either session, but not both.
PUBLIC APPEARANCE
PUBLIC APPEARANCE items are reports on action or informational issues that might stimulate
public discussion, but that do not require formal noticing as public hearings. You are welcome to
offer your comments after being recognized by the Chair. The Chair may limit the time allocated to
each speaker.
3. Election of Officers and Appointments to Subcommittees
PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC HEARINGS are required by law for certain actions. You are welcome to offer your
comments after being recognized by the Chair. The Chair may limit the time allocated to each
speaker. Project representation is encouraged.
4. Consider 1008 West Franklin Street; HP Application 15-243 for H-2 Historic Zoning;
Applicant/Owner Teresa Hanna; R-1-6 Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA
Requirements
5. Consider 138 Seafoam Avenue; HP Application 15-227 for H-2 Historic Zoning;
Applicant/Owner Carol Harpster; R-1-6-D1 Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA
Requirements
PUBLIC APPEARANCE
STUDY SESSION items are used to provide information and to clarify issues. Study Sessions
provide a setting for informal discussions between staff, consultants, board, commission,
committee members, and the City Council regarding specific programs, projects or policies. No
formal action is taken on the items.
6. Training on Appeals
RECESS 5:30 p.m.
RECONVENE
***Evening Session Agenda***
7:00 - 11:00 p.m.
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS. At this time, the public may speak for a maximum of three
minutes on any subject which is within the jurisdiction of the Monterey Planning Commission and
which is not on the agenda. Any person or group desiring to bring an item to the attention of the
Commission may do so during Public Comments or by addressing a letter of explanation to the
Commission, City Hall, Monterey, CA 93940. Public Comments are taken during the afternoon
session and continued at the evening session. Individuals may choose to speak once for up to
three minutes at either session, but not both.
PUBLIC APPEARANCE
PUBLIC APPEARANCE items are reports on action or informational issues that might stimulate
public discussion, but that do not require formal noticing as public hearings. You are welcome to
offer your comments after being recognized by the Chair. The Chair may limit the time allocated to
each speaker.
7. Receive Report on Waterfront Master Plan; Receive Public Comment and Hold
Discussion
Planning Commission
Tuesday, September 8, 2015
2
COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS
COMMISSIONERS may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or make a
brief report on his or her activities. In addition, a Commissioner may provide a referral to staff or
other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to the body at a subsequent
meeting concerning any City matter, or direct staff to place a request to agendize a matter of
business on a future agenda. (G.C. 54954.2)
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS supply information on activities or
announcements and may request clarification or direction regarding the scheduling of meetings
and study sessions.
8. Planning Office Update
ADJOURNMENT
ADJOURNMENT — The general policy of the Planning Commission is that the Afternoon Session will
end no later than 5:30 p.m. and the Evening Session will end no later than 11:00 p.m. Any public
agenda items that have not been completed within the designated adjournment time may be formally
extended by the Commission, or continued to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission
Meeting, or continued to a Special Meeting.
Agenda packets may be reviewed by the public in the Monterey Public Library, in the Planning Office,
or on the web at http://www.monterey.org beginning late Friday afternoon prior to the date of the
meeting.
Members of the public have the right to address the Commission on any Agenda items. The Chair will
formally open the floor for public comment. However, if you wish to speak to items during "Consent
Agenda" or "Staff Informational Report," please advise the staff or the Chair prior to the action on that
item and you will be recognized. Notification as much in advance as possible is appreciated.
Information distributed to the Commission at the meeting becomes part of the public record. A copy of
written material, pictures, etc. should be provided to the Secretary for this purpose.
Planning Commission decisions may be appealed within ten (10) days from the date of the decision on
forms available in the Planning Division during business hours. When the tenth day falls on a weekend
or a holiday, the appeal deadline date is the next working day following the holiday or weekend. An
appeal fee will apply. For more agenda information, call the Planning Office at (831) 646-3885.
Planning Commission Meetings are cable cast live and videotaped for replay on Monterey's
Government Access Channel 25 by Access Monterey Peninsula (AMP).
CITY OF MONTEREY'S 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES:
Voicemail: (831) 646-3799
FAX: (831) 646-3793
Email: suggest@monterey.org
WebPage: http://www.monterey.org
The City of Monterey is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs
and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special
assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (831) 646-
3935. Notification 30 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title
II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. For communication-related
assistance, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS
offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7
days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use
CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device.
Planning Commission
Tuesday, September 8, 2015
3
UPCOMING MEETINGS AT CITY HALL
Sep 10 Historic Preservation Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Sep 15 Council Regular Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
Sep 16 Architectural Review Committee Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Sep 17 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM
Sep 17 Zoning Administrator Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Sep 22 Planning Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Sep 23 Council Study Session, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
Sep 23 Oversight Board Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM
Sep 23 Library Board Meeting, Library Community Room - 5:00 PM
Sep 28 Colton Hall Museum Cultural Art Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Sep 30 Council Study Session, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
Oct 1 Zoning Administrator Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Oct 6 Council Regular Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
Oct 7 Architectural Review Committee Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Oct 8 Historic Preservation Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Oct 13 Planning Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Oct 15 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, Council Chamber - 7:00 PM
Oct 15 Zoning Administrator Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
Oct 20 Council Regular Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 PM
Oct 21 Architectural Review Committee Meeting, Council Chamber - 4:00 pm
MORE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE BY CALLING 646-3885
Planning Commission
Tuesday, September 8, 2015
4
Get email alerts for Monterey
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.