Planning Commission Meeting
Regular MeetingMonterey, CA · October 27, 2020
Minutes
DocuSign Envelope ID: D6C12B49-6290-4739-A9F1-CEC88686A474
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
October 27, 2020
4:00 PM – 5:30 PM
7:00 PM – 1100 PM
TELECONFERENCE
580 PACIFIC STREET, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Commissioners Present: Brassfield, Freeman (arrived at 4:44 p.m.), Dawson, Fletcher,
Latasa, Millich, Reed
Commissioners Absent: None.
Staff Members Present: Community Development Director Cole, City Attorney Davi,
Principal Planner Flower, Senior Associate Planner Fernanda
Roveri, Senior Associate Planner Chris Schmidt, Associate
Planner Sabdo, Recording Secretary Cleary, Recording
Secretary Ziel
***Afternoon Session Agenda***
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Brassfield called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Recording Secretary Ziel provided
details on how to participate and provide public comment during the meeting
CONSENT ITEMS
Approval of Minutes
2. September 22, 2020
ACTION: Approved as submitted.
On a motion by Commissioner Reed, seconded by Commissioner Latasa, and carried by the
following vote, the Planning Commission approved the September 22, 2020 Minutes as
submitted:
AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Brassfield, Dawson, Fletcher, Latasa, Millich, Reed
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Freeman
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
3. Consider 575 Foam Street; Residential Condominium Subdivision Application for 4-
Unit Condominium Project, Applicant Eric Miller; Property Owner EGM Investors LLC.;
PC-LH Zoning District; Commercial General Plan Land Use Designation Exempt from
CEQA Requirements per Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1
ACTION: Approved as submitted.
Staff Presentation/Commissioner Questions
None.
Applicant Comments
DocuSign Envelope ID: D6C12B49-6290-4739-A9F1-CEC88686A474
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday October 27, 2020
None.
Commissioner Comments
None.
On a motion by Commissioner Reed, seconded by Commissioner Fletcher and carried by the
following vote, the Planning Commission approved Residential Condominium Subdivision
Application for a 4-Unit Condominium Project at 575 Foam:
AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Brassfield, Dawson, Fletcher, Latasa, Millich,
Reed
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Freeman
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
***End of Consent Agenda***
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
PUBLIC HEARING
4. Approve 2 Portola Plaza Use Permit Amendment 20-0171 to Allow Modifications to an
Existing New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (AT&T) Wireless Facility; Applicant James
Phillips, MasTec Network Solutions; Owner: Custom House Hotel, L.P. – Portola Hotel
and Spa; VAF Zoning District; Commercial General Plan Designation; Exempt from
CEQA per Article 19, Section 15303, Class 3
ACTION: Approved as submitted.
Staff Presentation/Commissioner Questions
Wireless Consultant Jerry Hittleman, with Rincon Consultants, presented the Agenda Report
and answered Commissioner questions.
Commissioner Latasa asked where in the rooms exposure is measured. Wireless Engineer
Bill Hammett, with Hammett and Edison, explained the exposure is an average over the entire
body, for someone six foot seven inches tall standing on the floor of the balcony. Mr. Hammett
reiterated exposure levels will be much lower inside because of the stucco walls and dividers.
Chair Brassfield asked for clarification in regard to danger. Mr. Hammett stated there is no
danger, as the exposure inside the rooms will be in single-digit percent, and explained the
standards are based on full-time, 24/7 exposure.
Applicant Comments
Mr. Hammett further explained the project proposal and answered Commissioner questions.
Public Comments
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday October 27, 2020
2
DocuSign Envelope ID: D6C12B49-6290-4739-A9F1-CEC88686A474
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday October 27, 2020
Nina Beety requested a pause in the permitting process based on disabled accommodations.
Ms. Beety provided personal information and requested information on liability and insurance
coverage for the project. Ms. Beety spoke in favor of project denial.
Navine Albert spoke against the permit amendment on the claims that the FCC may not have
involved medical experts in determining exposure limits, the FCC maximum amount is higher
than RF limits in other countries, wildlife and trees may be affected by RF waves, and some
individuals are sensitive to electromagnetic waves.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Reed claimed there are no grounds to deny this project because it follows all
FCC standards.
Chair Brassfield asked if the antenna could be moved to reduce exposure on balconies, and
suggested the PC request this of the applicant, AT&T. Commissioner Millich stated that unless
the topic is again continued to let AT&T address the question, he will second Commissioner
Reed’s motion.
Commissioner Latasa claimed he would not vote in favor of the motion based on location of
antennas and RF waves beaming onto balconies or hotel rooms.
Commissioner Fletcher concurred with Commissioner Reed and spoke in support of approval.
Vice Chair Freeman arrived at 4:44 p.m.
Commissioner Reed moved to approve.
On a motion by Commissioner Reed, seconded by Commissioner Millich, and carried by the
following vote, the Planning Commission approved Use Permit Amendment 20-0171 to allow
modifications to an existing New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (AT&T) wireless facility at 2
Portola Plaza, with findings and conditions of approval specified by Staff in the Agenda Report:
AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Fletcher, Millich, Reed
NOES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Brassfield, Dawson, Latasa
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Freeman
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
Commissioner Reed voiced frustration for being stuck without a decision, citing the
responsibility of the Planning Commission is specifically to examine compliance.
Commissioner Latasa expressed hesitance to approve the project on the basis of safety,
because RF beams seem to go directly into hotel rooms and nothing was provided to show
vertical exposure. Commissioner Dawson concurred and shared concern for high RF
exposure to animals and people.
Chair Brassfield stated his concern is balancing the interest of citizens with industry goals.
The Chair motioned to approve the project if transmitters are rotated to reduce impact on
balconies.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday October 27, 2020
3
DocuSign Envelope ID: D6C12B49-6290-4739-A9F1-CEC88686A474
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday October 27, 2020
Commissioner Reed reiterated the intent of the PC is to determine whether the project
complies with FCC, City, and State standards.
The Planning Commission recessed at 5:00 p.m. and reconvened at 5:03 p.m.
Christine Davi, City Attorney, explained that under procedural rules, a tie vote is the equivalent
of no action, and the applicant could ask for it to be deemed approved. Chair Brassfield
mentioned the applicant would like to speak and Ms. Davi suggested the Chair reopen public
hearing.
Chair Brassfield reopened Public Hearing.
Applicant
Applicant James Phillips, on behalf of AT&T, stated the antenna locations were chosen to
disguise the cell sites and avoid putting cell towers in the middle of the City. Mr. Phillips further
specified the selected antenna locations correspond with other cell towers that AT&T already
has, and to move them would hinder the service provided.
Mr. Phillips stated that every person has RF in their house and on their cell phones, and
explained that MasTec staff members work in the RF, very close to emissions, every day
without health issues.
Chair Brassfield reopened Public Comment.
Public Comment
Nina Beety claimed her questions have not been answered, including the issue of health
versus disability. Ms. Beety cited the Telecommunications Act, specifying ADA guarantees
her access to public right of ways and this RF exposure would prevent her from using public
streets. Ms. Beety asked for a legal presence to speak on disability, Telecommunications Act,
and ADA.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Latasa offered to change his vote based on FCC standards, concurring with
Commissioner Reed, and claimed the approval potentially creates liability for the City and the
Portola Hotel. Commissioner Latasa made a motion to reconsider the previous motion.
On a motion by Commissioner Latasa, seconded by Commissioner Millich, and carried by the
following vote, the Planning Commission reconsidered the previous motion made by
Commissioner Reed:
AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Brassfield, Dawson, Fletcher, Latasa, Millich,
Reed
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Freeman
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday October 27, 2020
4
DocuSign Envelope ID: D6C12B49-6290-4739-A9F1-CEC88686A474
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday October 27, 2020
On a motion by Commissioner Reed, seconded by Commissioner Millich, and carried by the
following vote, the Planning Commission approved Use Permit Amendment 20-0171 to allow
modifications to an existing New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (AT&T) wireless facility at 2
Portola Plaza, in accordance with findings and conditions of approval specified by Staff in the
Agenda Report:
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Dawson, Fletcher, Latasa, Millich, Reed
NOES: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Brassfield
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Freeman
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
5. Consider 491 Webster Street; Application for H-2 Historic Zoning (TM 20-0192);
Applicant/Owner Gregory and Rebecca Beardsley; PC-D-ES Zoning District; Exempt
from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15305, Class 5
ACTION: Approved as submitted.
Staff Presentation/Commissioner Questions
Associate Planner Sabdo presented the Agenda Report and answered Commissioner
questions.
Applicant Comments
Applicant Greg Beardsley provided information on the house remodel and stated his intention
is to keep the historicity of the property to qualify for a Mills Act contract.
Public Comments
None.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Dawson claimed the integrity is lost in this building, and the changes made to
this house could likely get it removed from the historic list. Vice Chair Freeman agreed, stating
this house has become newer, better, and more spacious, but its historicity is questionable.
Chair Brassfield agreed with previous Commissioner comments and asked what percentage
of the building must remain historic for it to be considered historic.
Commissioner Latasa stated that in many jurisdictions the primary consideration is the street
façade, not so much the back façade, and this street façade is maintained. Commissioner
Latasa spoke in support of approval because he trusts the Historic Preservation Commission
and believes the project follows the Secretary of Interior Standards.
Commissioner Fletcher mentioned the standard focus is on the front-facing façade and spoke
in support of the project because this front-facing façade is consistent with historic standards.
On a motion by Commissioner Fletcher, seconded by Commissioner Latasa, and carried by
the following vote, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve
application TM 20-0192 for H-2 Historic Zoning at 491 Webster Street:
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday October 27, 2020
5
DocuSign Envelope ID: D6C12B49-6290-4739-A9F1-CEC88686A474
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday October 27, 2020
AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Brassfield, Freeman, Fletcher, Latasa, Millich,
Reed
NOES: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Dawson
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
The Planning Commission recessed at 5:44 p.m. and reconvened at 7:00 p.m.
***Evening Session Agenda***
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
PUBLIC HEARING (EVENING)
6. Consider 946 W. Franklin Street; Application TM-20-0206 for H-2 Historic Zoning;
Applicant/Owner Laura Adame Fenwick; R-1-6 Zoning District; Exempt from CEQA per
Article 19, Section 15305, Class 5
ACTION: Approved as submitted.
Commissioner Dawson and Commissioner Latasa recused from this item due to proximity of
owned property to the project site.
Staff Presentation/Commissioner Questions
Senior Associate Planner Roveri presented the Agenda Report and answered Commissioner
questions.
Applicant Comments
Applicant Laura Fenwick was available to answer Commissioner questions.
Public Comments
None.
Commissioner Comments
Vice Chair Freeman spoke in support of the project and stated the presentation is
straightforward.
On a motion by Vice Chair Freeman, seconded by Commissioner Reed, and carried by the
following vote, the Planning Commission recommended City Council to approve Application
TM-20-0206 for H-2 Historic Zoning at 946 W. Franklin Street:
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Brassfield, Freeman, Fletcher, Millich, Reed
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
RECUSED: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Dawson, Latasa
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday October 27, 2020
6
DocuSign Envelope ID: D6C12B49-6290-4739-A9F1-CEC88686A474
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday October 27, 2020
7. Consider 425 Alvarado Street; Use Permit Application UP-20-0233 for a Bar Use;
Applicant Mitchel Sawhney; Owner Abinante Properties LLC; PC-D (Planned
Community-Downtown) Zoning District; Commercial General Plan Land Use
Designation; Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1
ACTION: Approved as submitted.
Staff Presentation/Commissioner Questions
Senior Associate Planner Roveri presented the Agenda Report and answered Commissioner
questions.
Chair Brassfield asked if there is space for social distancing and Plexiglas dividers. Ms. Roveri
confirmed there is. Community Development Director Cole stated bars are currently prohibited
from being open. Ms. Roveri mentioned the applicant would be applying for temporary outdoor
seating during the pandemic.
Vice Chair Freeman asked if the applicant is aware of the competing business right next door.
Commissioner Latasa suggested the Building Department would need to review and consider
two exits for safety, and asked if a water release form has been granted. Ms. Roveri said
Epsilon Greek Restaurant is willing to forfeit 3 seats to provide the Whiskey Club enough water
credits to operate as described.
Applicant Comments
Applicant Mitchel Sawhney stated the owner of Hellam’s encouraged him to go next door. Mr.
Sawhney answered Commissioner questions and provided information on the proposed
business and its operation.
Mr. Sawhney claimed neighbors have offered partnerships to supply customers with food
during COVID-19 and potentially beyond. Regarding a second exit, Mr. Sawhney stated the
landlord plans to subdivide the space and the back half of the old music store would be a
second business, likely rendering it unnecessary to create a second exit.
Commissioner Latasa reiterated Mr. Sawhney could talk to the Building Department regarding
a second exit and preliminary plan review. Ms. Roveri offered to forward the plans to the
Building Department.
Public Comments
None.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Reed stated the use is compatible with other downtown businesses and will
bring people to downtown Monterey.
Commissioner Dawson spoke in support of the project.
On a motion by Commissioner Reed, seconded by Commissioner Fletcher, and carried by the
following vote, the Planning Commission approved Use Permit Application UP-20-0233 for a
bar use (tasting room) at 425 Alvarado Street, subject to findings, conditions, and standards
presented by Staff and found in the Agenda Report:
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday October 27, 2020
7
DocuSign Envelope ID: D6C12B49-6290-4739-A9F1-CEC88686A474
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday October 27, 2020
AYES: 7 COMMISSIONERS: Brassfield, Freeman, Dawson, Fletcher, Latasa,
Millich, Reed
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
8. Recommend City Council Adoption of an Ordinance Amending the City Code to Create
a Definition of Cannabis and Cannabis Products (38-11), Create an Industrial Use
Classification of Agricultural Testing Laboratory (Including Cannabis Testing) (38-16),
Conditionally Permit Agricultural Testing Laboratory Use in I-R Zoning District (38-
40(B)), Create Supplementary Regulations for Cannabis-related Agricultural Testing
Laboratories (38-41), and Exempt Licensed Cannabis Testing Laboratories (22-39);
Exempt from CEQA per CA BPC 26055(h)
ACTION: Approved with modifications.
Staff Presentation/Commissioner Questions
Ms. Cole advised this hearing will be the first of many regarding cannabis, including regulations
for dispensaries, transportation, distribution, cultivation, and perhaps special events.
Senior Associate Planner Schmidt presented the Agenda Report and answered Commissioner
questions.
Commissioner Reed asked if “open space” includes parks, and questioned the 600-foot radius
from schools, suggesting testing facilities could be within the radius if State law does not
specifically prohibit it. Mr. Schmidt indicated the PC can establish a buffer zone around play
equipment or other areas primarily used by youth.
Commissioner Dawson asked why this topic is being heard before the PC after the use has
already been approved. Ms. Cole stated the Council requested the Ordinances be rewritten to
specify this use does not qualify as a nuisance.
Chair Brassfield inquired about State laws for health and safety regarding the disposition of
testing byproducts. Commissioner Reed mentioned the State-implemented chain of custody
for cannabis products and suggested adding a clause stating disposal is specified by State
law. Chair Brassfield concurred.
Applicant Comments
None. This project has no applicants.
Public Comments
Scott Willard, owner of Coverton Labs, outlined the Bureau of Cannabis Control (BCC)
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) requirements and provided information regarding testing
and chain of custody processes. Mr. Willard stated every employee must be background
checked prior to employment.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday October 27, 2020
8
DocuSign Envelope ID: D6C12B49-6290-4739-A9F1-CEC88686A474
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday October 27, 2020
Chair Brassfield inquired about other agricultural testing by Coverton Labs and how cannabis
samples will be disposed of. Mr. Willard explained protocols and practices for testing
agricultural products other than cannabis and stated destruction method depends on what form
the sample occupies. Mr. Willard elaborated that flower would be mixed with a chemical that
renders it useless and cartridges will be tagged, bagged, and sent to a cannabis-specific
disposal service.
Zoe Carter spoke in support or approval, suggested this type of facility could provide many
good-paying jobs, and stated this could aid in economic recovery. Ms. Carter encouraged the
PC to get creative about how to incorporate cannabis into the community.
Ms. Davi clarified that the State-mandated limitation radius does not include parks. Mr. Schmidt
suggested the radius could be changed or reduced to reflect PC ideals.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Reed suggested the City reduce the 600-foot buffer and mandate only certain
employees be background checked to allow for cost-effectiveness. Commissioner Reed spoke
in favor of approval without high taxation, citing the importance of encouraging legality from
those potentially operating unlicensed.
Chair Brassfield agreed with Commissioner Reed that the issue is regulatory and not retail,
and suggested parks need not be included in the ordinance unless Council requests it.
Commissioner Reed asked clarifying questions about the motion and State law. Ms. Cole
explained there is no State-mandated buffer from parks or residential units but State law does
regulate employee background checks. Ms. Davi explained the City does not need to codify
background checks that the State will require. Mr. Schmidt reiterated the 150-foot radius from
residential units is not required by the State.
On a motion by Commissioner Reed, seconded by Commissioner Dawson, and carried by the
following vote, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council adopt an ordinance
amending City Code Chapter 38, Sections 38-11, 38-16, 38-40(B), 38-41, and Chapter 22,
Section 22-39(A) to create a definition of cannabis and cannabis products to create an
Industrial Use classification of agricultural testing laboratory, including cannabis testing,
conditionally permitted in the I-R zoning district, subject to regulations as presented and subject
to changes on G-5 to remove public recreation center and public parks, remove conditions
stating the establishment must not be located within 150-feet of residential use (ends at k-12),
delete 6-D altogether, and add a clause stating applicants must provide the City with a list of
key management employees and contact information:
AYES: 6 COMMISSIONERS: Brassfield, Freeman, Dawson, Fletcher, Latasa,
Reed
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Millich
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday October 27, 2020
9
DocuSign Envelope ID: D6C12B49-6290-4739-A9F1-CEC88686A474
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday October 27, 2020
9. Discuss Policy Guidance for Accessory Dwelling Units Ordinance Update to Comply
with State Requirements and Policy Options (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20,
Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
ACTION: Item discussed; guidance provided.
Staff Presentation/Commissioner Questions
Ms. Cole explained this topic is being discussed to gather Commission and public input.
Principal Planner Flower presented the Agenda Report and answered Commissioner
questions.
Commissioner Millich and Commissioner Fletcher asked about ADA requirements. Mr. Flower
explained he is working with the Building Department to ensure ADA standards are followed.
Commissioner Fletcher asked if zoning would change. Mr. Flower stated ADUs will remain R-
1 single-family properties. Ms. Davi confirmed regarding ADA requirements.
Commissioner Millich inquired about parking. Commissioner Fletcher and Chair Brassfield
expressed concern for potential parking issues. Possible solutions were deliberated.
Public Comments
Tom Rowley, resident of Fisherman Flats, encouraged Staff to develop incentives motivating
affordable housing and included parking because Fisherman Flats has no bus stops. Mr.
Rowley also stated airport safety should not be waived.
Kathryn Avila spoke in support of ADUs and stated many situations exist where taller ADUs
would be appropriate and fit. Ms. Avila quoted the Downtown Specific Plan from 2005 and
encouraged the PC to compile objective guidelines that maintain flexibility and character.
Bill Barranco stated he intends to build a carriage house on his property, to take cars off the
street and provide affordable housing. Mr. Barranco urged the PC to approve and discuss
further, as he aims to build an above-garage studio apartment as well.
Commissioner Comments
Vice Chair Freeman suggested preventing small-lot subdivision by establishing a prohibition
specifying the ADU or JADU cannot be sold separate from the primary dwelling.
Fletcher shared concern for the effect on single-family residential character in the
neighborhoods.
Commissioner Dawson spoke against ADUs, stating his Residential Estate lot with an ADU will
diminish in value because it would no longer be considered an R-1 lot. Commissioner Latasa
stated the only option is to change City Ordinances to reflect state law.
Commissioner Reed stated the decision lies in whether to encourage or discourage ADUs in
regards to the State-mandated minimum, and spoke in favor of establishing a clear set of rules
with limited gray area.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday October 27, 2020
10
DocuSign Envelope ID: D6C12B49-6290-4739-A9F1-CEC88686A474
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday October 27, 2020
Chair Brassfield asked about a maximum height limit. Potential challenges and solutions were
discussed.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
Brassfield complimented the Planning Staff on an excellent meeting.
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
Update received.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Kimberly Cole Chair
Community Development Director Planning Commission
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday October 27, 2020
11
Agenda
Planning Commission
Agenda Commissioners
Mike Brassfield, Chair
Planning Commission Meeting Sandra Freeman, Vice Chair
Mike Dawson
Tuesday, October 27, 2020 Daniel Fletcher
Terry Latasa
4:00 PM - 5:30 PM Stephen Millich
Teleconference 7:00 PM – 11:00 PM Hansen Reed
Monterey, California
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Pursuant to Governor Newsom's Executive Orders N-29-20 and N-33-
20, and to do all we can to help slow the spread of COVID-19 (coronavirus), meetings of the
Monterey City Council and its Boards and Commissions are being conducted with virtual
(electronic) participation only.
BEFORE EACH MEETING, members of the public may participate by submitting comment(s) to
planning@monterey.org until ½ hour before the start of the meeting. These emails and text
messages are shared with the Planning Commission prior to the start of the meeting, but are not
read aloud. All comments become part of the record and are made available online at
https://monterey.org/submitted-comments
DURING EACH MEETING:
Join the ZoomGov Webinar to participate or watch the meeting live (no time delay):
On a computer or smartphone: https://monterey-org.zoomgov.com/j/1615636904
Or by telephone: Dial 833-568-8864 (Toll Free) or 669-254-5252 (Campbell, Calif.)
o Enter Webinar ID: 161 563 6904 #
o If prompted to enter a participant ID, press #
Need more help or seeking guidance on making public comments? Read our
ZoomGov Meeting Instructions.
Meetings are also streamed live on https://www.youtube.com/user/cityofmonterey (10 second
delay) and on Comcast Channel 25 (up to 90 second delay).
FIELD TRIP
The Planning Commission will not conduct a field trip to review the October 27, 2020 PC
meeting agenda. For more information, call (831) 646-3886. Date Posted: October 23,
2020
***Afternoon Session Agenda***
4:00 - 5:30 p.m.
1. Meeting Procedures
CALL TO ORDER
CONSENT ITEMS
CONSENT ITEMS allow for a review of those items recommended for approval on
consent or recommended to be continued, tabled or withdrawn, etc. Consent items
consist of those items which are routine and for which a staff recommendation has been
prepared. A member of the public or a Commissioner may request that an item
recommended for approval on consent be heard on the regular agenda for further
discussion.
Approval of Minutes
2. September 22, 2020
Other Consent Items
3. Consider 575 Foam Street; Residential Condominium Subdivision Application
for 4-Unit Condominium Project, Applicant Eric Miller; Property Owner EGM
Investors LLC.; PC-LH Zoning District; Commercial General Plan Land Use
Designation Exempt from CEQA Requirements per Article 19, Section 15301,
Class 1
***End of Consent Agenda***
PUBLIC COMMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS. At this time, the public may speak for a maximum of three minutes
on any subject which is within the jurisdiction of the Monterey Planning Commission and
which is not on the agenda. Any person or group desiring to bring an item to the attention
of the Commission may do so during Public Comments or by addressing a letter of
explanation to the Commission, City Hall, Monterey, CA 93940. Public Comments are
taken during the afternoon session and continued at the evening session. Individuals
may choose to speak once for up to three minutes at either session, but not both.
PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC HEARINGS are required by law for certain actions. You are welcome to offer
your comments after being recognized by the Chair. The Chair may limit the time
allocated to each speaker. Project representation is encouraged.
4. Approve 2 Portola Plaza Use Permit Amendment 20-0171 to Allow
Modifications to an Existing New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (AT&T)
Wireless Facility; Applicant James Phillips, MasTec Network Solutions;
Owner: Custom House Hotel, L.P. – Portola Hotel and Spa; VAF Zoning
District; Commercial General Plan Designation; Exempt from CEQA per
Article 19, Section 15303, Class 3
5. Consider 491 Webster Street; Application for H-2 Historic Zoning (TM 20-
0192); Applicant/Owner Gregory and Rebecca Beardsley; PC-D-ES Zoning
District; Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15305, Class 5
6. Consider 946 W. Franklin Street; Application TM-20-0206 for H-2 Historic
Zoning; Applicant/Owner Laura Adame Fenwick; R-1-6 Zoning District;
Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15305, Class 5
7. Consider 425 Alvarado Street; Use Permit Application UP-20-0233 for a Bar
Use; Applicant Mitchel Sawhney; Owner Abinante Properties LLC; PC-D
(Planned Community-Downtown) Zoning District; Commercial General Plan
Land Use Designation; Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15301,
Class 1
RECESS 5:30 p.m.
RECONVENE
***Evening Session Agenda***
7:00 - 11:00 p.m.
Planning Commission
10/27/2020 4:00:00 PM
2
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS. At this time, the public may speak for a maximum of
three minutes on any subject which is within the jurisdiction of the Monterey Planning
Commission and which is not on the agenda. Any person or group desiring to bring an
item to the attention of the Commission may do so during Public Comments or by
addressing a letter of explanation to the Commission, City Hall, Monterey, CA 93940.
Public Comments are taken during the afternoon session and continued at the evening
session. Individuals may choose to speak once for up to three minutes at either session,
but not both.
PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC HEARINGS are required by law for certain actions. You are welcome to offer
your comments after being recognized by the Chair. The Chair may limit the time
allocated to each speaker. Project representation is encouraged.
8. Recommend City Council Adoption of an Ordinance Amending the City Code
to Create a Definition of Cannabis and Cannabis Products (38-11), Create an
Industrial Use Classification of Agricultural Testing Laboratory (Including
Cannabis Testing) (38-16), Conditionally Permit Agricultural Testing
Laboratory Use in I-R Zoning District (38-40(B)), Create Supplementary
Regulations for Cannabis-related Agricultural Testing Laboratories (38-41),
and Exempt Licensed Cannabis Testing Laboratories (22-39); Exempt from
CEQA per CA BPC 26055(h)
PUBLIC APPEARANCE
PUBLIC APPEARANCE items are reports on action or informational issues that might
stimulate public discussion, but that do not require formal noticing as public hearings.
You are welcome to offer your comments after being recognized by the Chair. The Chair
may limit the time allocated to each speaker.
9. Discuss Policy Guidance for Accessory Dwelling Units Ordinance Update to
Comply with State Requirements and Policy Options (Not a Project under
CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section
15061)
COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS
COMMISSIONERS may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or
make a brief report on his or her activities. In addition, a Commissioner may provide a
referral to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to
the body at a subsequent meeting concerning any City matter, or direct staff to place a
request to agendize a matter of business on a future agenda. (G.C. 54954.2)
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS supply information on activities or
announcements and may request clarification or direction regarding the scheduling of
meetings and study sessions.
10. Planning Office Update
ADJOURNMENT
Adjournment — The general policy of the Planning Commission is that the Afternoon
Session will end no later than 5:30 p.m. and the Evening Session will end no later than
Planning Commission
10/27/2020 4:00:00 PM
3
11:00 p.m. Any public agenda items that have not been completed within the designated
adjournment time may be formally extended by the Commission, or continued to the next
regularly scheduled Planning Commission Meeting, or continued to a Special Meeting.
Agenda packets may be reviewed by the public in the Monterey Public Library, in the Planning Office,
or on the web at http://www.monterey.org beginning late Friday afternoon prior to the date of the
meeting.
Members of the public have the right to address the Commission on any Agenda items. The Chair will
formally open the floor for public comment. However, if you wish to speak to items during "Consent
Agenda" or "Staff Informational Report," please advise the staff or the Chair prior to the action on that
item and you will be recognized. Notification as much in advance as possible is appreciated.
Information distributed to the Commission at the meeting becomes part of the public record. A copy of
written material, pictures, etc. should be provided to the Secretary for this purpose.
Planning Commission decisions may be appealed within ten (10) days from the date of the decision on
forms available in the Planning Division during business hours. When the tenth day falls on a weekend
or a holiday, the appeal deadline date is the next working day following the holiday or weekend. An
appeal fee will apply. For more agenda information, call the Planning Office at (831) 646-3885.
Planning Commission Meetings are cable cast live and videotaped for replay on Monterey's
Government Access Channel 25 by Access Monterey Peninsula (AMP).
CITY OF MONTEREY'S 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES:
Voicemail: (831) 646-3799
FAX: (831) 646-3793
Email: suggest@monterey.org
WebPage: http://www.monterey.org
The City of Monterey is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs
and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special
assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (831) 646-
3935. Notification 30 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title
II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. For communication-related
assistance, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS
offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7
days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use
CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device.
MORE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE BY CALLING 646-3885
Planning Commission
10/27/2020 4:00:00 PM
4
Get email alerts for Monterey
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.