Planning Commission Meeting
Regular MeetingMonterey, CA · December 8, 2020
Minutes
DocuSign Envelope ID: CDF7BC45-A7A9-40AC-B6BE-7E166E2B6112
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
December 08, 2020
4:00 PM – 5:30 PM
7:00 PM – 1100 PM
TELECONFERENCE
580 PACIFIC STREET, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Commissioners Present: Brassfield, Freeman, Dawson (joined evening session at 7:06
p.m.), Fletcher, Latasa, Millich, Reed
Commissioners Absent: None.
Staff Members Present: Community Development Director Cole, City Traffic Engineer
Renny, Urban Forester Prouty, Senior Associate Planner Roveri,
Associate Planner Sabdo, Recording Secretary Cleary,
Recording Secretary Ziel
***Afternoon Session Agenda***
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Brassfield called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Recording Secretary Ziel provided
details on how to participate and provide public comment during the meeting.
CONSENT ITEMS
Approval of Minutes
2. November 10, 2020
ACTION: Approved as amended.
Regarding item 3 page 2, Commissioner Reed recommended changing Hansen to Reed.
On a motion by Commissioner Reed, seconded by Vice Chair Freeman, and carried by the
following vote, the Planning Commission approved the November 10, 2020 Minutes as
amended:
AYES: 7 COMMISSIONERS: Brassfield, Freeman, Dawson, Fletcher, Latasa,
Millich, Reed
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
***End of Consent Agenda***
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Marta Kraftzeck, resident of Monterey, reiterated her submitted letter regarding the Monterey
Peninsula Unified School District (MPUSD) Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Ms.
Kraftzeck shared concerns for Monterey High School’s potential addition of stadium lights in
regard to potentials for sky glow, parking issues, and noise interference, urging the Planning
Commission (PC) to study impacts and submit a comment to MPUSD for the Draft EIR.
DocuSign Envelope ID: CDF7BC45-A7A9-40AC-B6BE-7E166E2B6112
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday December 08, 2020
Local resident Tony Tollner commented on the MPUSD Draft EIR, citing concerns for possible
impacts on residents, including potential noise issues, light pollution, parking, safety,
emergency vehicle accessibility, liability, and historic issues. Mr. Tollner requested the
Planning Commission to ask MPUSD to change their priorities.
PUBLIC HEARING
3. Consider Adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Greenbelt Fuel Reduction
Project to reduce the risk of wildfire within the City’s greenbelt system; Applicant City
of Monterey, Justin Prouty, Interim Urban Forester; Open Space, Planned Community,
and Residential Single-Family Zoning Districts; Parks and Open Space General Plan
Designation
ACTION: Adopted as submitted.
Staff Presentation/Commissioner Questions
Associate Planner Sabdo presented the Agenda Report and answered Commissioner
questions.
Vice Chair Freeman asked if a coordinated effort exists between Monterey and surrounding
cities to care for local flora and fauna. Community Development Director Cole stated the Fire
Departments have been meeting to discuss safety measures.
Commissioner Reed asked if it is possible to establish multi-year approval. Ms. Cole clarified
the purpose of this document is to have multi-year clearance.
Regarding the Vice Chair’s question, Urban Forester Prouty confirmed the City is working with
local Fire districts to develop a fire defense plan.
Commissioner Latasa asked about the Old Capital Site. Ms. Sabdo explained the site was
obtained after the plan was created and will likely be added later.
Public Comments
Resident Christopher Barlow shared concern for fire prevention on private property, asked if
outreach was done on private lands, and asked if trees are required to be replaced when
removed from private property.
Laura, resident of Carmel Highlands, referenced the webinar presentation series, Care of the
Environment (COTE) and the Carmel Climate Meeting on the Carmel City Hall website, stating
Cal Fire and local organizations rated resiliency at residential properties around Carmel.
Responding to Mr. Barlow’s comments, Mr. Prouty explained new trees are typically required
to replace those removed from private property.
Chair Brassfield suggested the public view the referenced webinar.
Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Dawson mentioned the inclusion of the Old Capital Site to the Greenbelt Fuel
Reduction Project should occur, emphasizing fire hazards there.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday December 08, 2020
2
DocuSign Envelope ID: CDF7BC45-A7A9-40AC-B6BE-7E166E2B6112
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday December 08, 2020
Commissioner Reed spoke in support of adopting the MND.
Chair Brassfield asked if the Fire Department talks with the County regarding lots adjoining
City property. Mr. Prouty suggested this would be best answered by Fire.
Vice Chair Freeman asked if a plan is in place to add the Old Capital Site. Ms. Sabdo stated
the site would be added in a future environmental process. Ms. Cole provided details.
On a motion by Commissioner Reed, seconded by Commissioner Fletcher and carried by the
following vote, the Planning Commission adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Project to reduce the risk of wildfire within the City’s greenbelt
system as submitted:
AYES: 7 COMMISSIONERS: Brassfield, Freeman, Dawson, Fletcher, Latasa,
Millich, Reed
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
RECUSED: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
4. Deny Appeal of 34 Cielo Vista Drive; Application AP-20-0249 Appealing Architectural
Review Committee Approval (Resolution A20-019) of Architectural Review Permit ARP-
20-0205 for a Second-Story Addition to an Existing One-Story Single Family Dwelling;
Appellant Nicolas W. Smith with Horan Lloyd on behalf of Allen and Steffeny Tremain;
Applicant Frank Dost, Architect; Owner Mark Waite; R-1-10 Zoning District; Low
Density Residential General Plan Designation; Exempt from CEQA Per Article 19,
Section 15301, Class 1
ACTION: Item not heard; appeal withdrawn prior to meeting.
The Planning Commission recessed at 4:40 p.m. and reconvened at 7:00 p.m.
***Evening Session Agenda***
Commissioner Dawson joined the evening session at 7:06 p.m.
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS
Pat Venza referenced the MPUSD Parking Lot Improvement Plan and expressed concern for
new parking sites and egress at Logan Lane. Ms. Venza requested the City Traffic Engineer to
address this issue with the PC, citing concern for safety issues and first responder access.
PUBLIC APPEARANCE (EVENING)
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday December 08, 2020
3
DocuSign Envelope ID: CDF7BC45-A7A9-40AC-B6BE-7E166E2B6112
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday December 08, 2020
5. Discuss the Draft City of Monterey Transportation Adaptation Plan, Provide Input, and
Gather Community Feedback (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378
and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
ACTION: Item discussed.
Staff Presentation/Commissioner Questions
Senior Associate Planner Roveri introduced Consultants Rebecca Verity with GEI Consultants
and Frederik Venter from Kimley-Horn & Associates to present the Agenda Report and answer
Commissioner questions.
Ms. Verity provided background information and benefits of planning for sea level rise. Mr.
Venter supplied information regarding current and future traffic trends and issues. Ms. Verity
provided potential solutions while explaining benefits and downfalls of each.
Commissioner Millich asked how people would get to Cannery Row if there is no tunnel. Mr.
Venter provided options. Commissioner Millich asked for the daily traffic count through the
Lighthouse tunnel. City Traffic Engineer Renny explained 55,000 cars travel through the tunnel
each day.
Commissioner Latasa asked for the Caltrans grant amount. Ms. Roveri explained $240,000
was granted for this project.
Commissioner Latasa asked if there is any relationship between retreating and tsunami risk.
Ms. Cole stated the low point is Del Monte Avenue and Lake El Estero, and the same area at-
risk for flooding would be at risk for tsunamis.
Commissioner Latasa shared concern for impacts in neighboring areas and potential erosion
on nearby beaches. Ms. Cole explained there are two significant impacts: scouring at the base
of the wall, and increased erosion on either side. Ms. Verity elaborated. Ms. Cole stated more
research is needed on environmental impacts if the City considers a sea wall.
Commissioner Latasa asked for a cost breakdown for the viaduct option. Mr. Venter explained.
Commissioner Dawson asked how sandbagging sand mines in Marina affects sand flow into
the harbor and suggested surveying the height of king tides. Ms. Cole suggested the last time
she observed king tides water was flooding near the Recreation Trail.
Vice Chair Freeman asked when the managed retreat would start and who would fund it. Ms.
Verity explained further analyses are necessary to determine answers.
Commissioner Dawson asked if triggers could be set up to help inform a course of action.
Chair Brassfield asked if plans for protecting the cemetery have been discussed, suggesting
revisiting this prior to making a plan.
Chair Brassfield inquired about the plan and impacts at Cannery Row, and asked about erosion
underneath potentially affecting the roadway. Ms. Verity and Ms. Cole explained the main
concern at Cannery Row is large waves.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday December 08, 2020
4
DocuSign Envelope ID: CDF7BC45-A7A9-40AC-B6BE-7E166E2B6112
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday December 08, 2020
Chair Brassfield asked if multi-agency coordination has been made regarding sea level rise.
Ms. Roveri stated inter-agency discussion has not yet occurred but hopefully will in the future.
Chair Brassfield suggested identifying areas now that could cause potential planning problems
later.
Commissioner Latasa asked about the urgency of this plan. Ms. Cole explained this will take
efforts for the next decades to come.
Public Comments
Lee Shahinian asked, regarding the sea wall option, asked if the Coastal Commission would
allow that structure and if the City would consider allowing locals to armor the beach to protect
homes. Ms. Roveri stated building a sea wall in front of La Playa homes was not yet examined
as this study was specifically for transportation, and mentioned sea walls are inconsistent with
Coastal Commission guidance.
Dan asked about unintended consequences, shared concern for interfering with nature, and
suggested using the least invasive solution.
Tom Rowley, oceanographic engineering graduate of NPS, recommended using the best
consultants possible, perhaps international affiliates, to find the best solution with limited
unintended consequences. Mr. Rowley suggested other affiliations are also working on this
problem.
Christopher Barlow, local property owner, mentioned the Lighthouse tunnel is already a victim
of sea level rise, built too low with pumps running constantly. Mr. Barlow suggested most
properties to be affected are businesses, and recommended working together to find a solution.
Curt Tipton, Downtown Neighborhood Association President and NCIP Representative, shared
concerns regarding seawalls and pumps, suggesting the seawall is for a 100-year flood but
should be built for the 500-year flood. Mr. Tipton suggested reexamining this to prevent added
costs for future generations, and spoke in support of managed retreat.
Morgan Ivens-Duran, resident of Glenwood Neighborhood, spoke in support of adaptation
measures and managed retreat, and stated a Del Monte viaduct seems potentially viable. Ms.
Ivens-Duran shared concern for shifting more traffic to North Fremont and urged the City to
keep focus on bicycle and pedestrian transportation throughout adaptation.
Trey inquired about a Highway 1 ecotone levy functions, benefits, and funding.
Ken Peterson suggested impacts on Monterey’s transportation will have a significant effect on
surrounding areas, urging the Commission and City Staff to work with surrounding affiliations
and cities to create a comprehensive solution.
Lawrence Garber, graduate student of MIIS, expressed gratitude for the City’s adaptation
efforts.
Mark McKeller, La Playa resident, asked about beach nourishment and how to more easily
facilitate it.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday December 08, 2020
5
DocuSign Envelope ID: CDF7BC45-A7A9-40AC-B6BE-7E166E2B6112
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday December 08, 2020
Commissioner Comments
Chair Brassfield thanked the public for joining the meeting and providing input.
Commissioner Fletcher stated the work that has been done so far is impressive but shows
much work still must be done, and encouraged Staff to continue pursuing funding and research.
Commissioner Reed encouraged Staff to prioritize work on this to plan for sea level rise
knowing it is eminent, sharing concern for tourism-dependent industries and resident impacts.
Vice Chair Freeman suggested the entire peninsula could benefit from a viaduct at Del Monte
and El Estero, citing importance in participation among the communities.
Commissioner Latasa expressed concern for the 2030 eight-inch rise, encouraged focus and
cooperation on finding solutions and funding, spoke in support of managed retreat, and shared
concern for physical and financial impacts.
Commissioner Millich suggested having a short-as-possible viaduct, citing concerns for traffic
impacts and first responder access if the four lanes on Del Monte are reduced to two.
Chair Brassfield suggested partnering with Caltrans and commended the Planning Office for
examining this problem and potential solutions.
Ms. Cole provided answers to questions raised during public comment period.
Ms. Verity explained an ecotone levy would replicate the appearance and ecological benefits
of a natural dune and look more like a natural environment than a standard levy.
Ms. Roveri stated a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant has been applied
for and a cost-benefit analysis is needed to receive funds, which will involve a robust public
outreach effort to discuss determining factors and solutions. Ms. Roveri explained the City
relies on grants to address these issues, and if the City receives the FEMA grant inter-agency
cooperation would be pursued. Ms. Cole stated this issue will be brought to the City Council in
the near future to discuss and accept public input.
Commissioner Millich suggested the Council consider a moratorium on development until
further research is done.
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
Update received.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
Chair Brassfield thanked Commissioners and Staff for their support through his time as Chair.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:06 p.m.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday December 08, 2020
6
DocuSign Envelope ID: CDF7BC45-A7A9-40AC-B6BE-7E166E2B6112
Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday December 08, 2020
Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Kimberly Cole Chair
Community Development Director Planning Commission
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Tuesday December 08, 2020
7
Agenda
Planning Commission
Agenda Commissioners
Mike Brassfield, Chair
Planning Commission Meeting Sandra Freeman, Vice Chair
Mike Dawson
Tuesday, December 8, 2020 Daniel Fletcher
Terry Latasa
4:00 – 5:30 PM Stephen Millich
Teleconference 7:00 – 11:00 PM Hansen Reed
Monterey, California
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Pursuant to Governor Newsom's Executive Orders N-29-20 and N-33-
20, and to do all we can to help slow the spread of COVID-19 (coronavirus), meetings of the
Monterey City Council and its Boards and Commissions are being conducted with virtual
(electronic) participation only.
BEFORE EACH MEETING, members of the public may participate by submitting comment(s) to
planning@monterey.org until ½ hour before the start of the meeting. These emails and text
messages are shared with the Planning Commission prior to the start of the meeting, but are not
read aloud. All comments become part of the record and are made available online at
https://monterey.org/submitted-comments
DURING EACH MEETING:
Join the ZoomGov Webinar to participate or watch the meeting live (no time delay):
On a computer or smartphone: https://monterey-org.zoomgov.com/j/1619908039
Or by telephone: 833 568 8864 (Toll Free) or 669 254 5252 (Campbell, CA) or 646 828
7666 (New York, NY). If one doesn’t work, please try another.
o Enter Webinar ID: 161 990 8039 #
o If prompted to enter a participant ID, press #
Need more help or seeking guidance on making public comments? Read our ZoomGov
Meeting Instructions.
Meetings are also streamed live on https://www.youtube.com/user/cityofmonterey (10 second
delay) and on Comcast Channel 25 (up to 90 second delay).
FIELD TRIP
The Planning Commission will not conduct a field trip to review the December 08, 2020
PC meeting agenda. For more information, call (831) 646-3885. Date Posted: December
04, 2020
***Afternoon Session Agenda***
4:00 - 5:30 PM
1. Meeting Procedures
CALL TO ORDER
CONSENT ITEMS
CONSENT ITEMS allow for a review of those items recommended for approval on
consent or recommended to be continued, tabled or withdrawn, etc. Consent items
consist of those items which are routine and for which a staff recommendation has been
prepared. A member of the public or a Commissioner may request that an item
recommended for approval on consent be heard on the regular agenda for further
discussion.
Approval of Minutes
2. November 10, 2020
***End of Consent Agenda***
PUBLIC COMMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENTS. At this time, the public may speak for a maximum of three minutes
on any subject which is within the jurisdiction of the Monterey Planning Commission and
which is not on the agenda. Any person or group desiring to bring an item to the attention
of the Commission may do so during Public Comments or by addressing a letter of
explanation to the Commission, City Hall, Monterey, CA 93940. Public Comments are
taken during the afternoon session and continued at the evening session. Individuals
may choose to speak once for up to three minutes at either session, but not both.
PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC HEARINGS are required by law for certain actions. You are welcome to offer
your comments after being recognized by the Chair. The Chair may limit the time
allocated to each speaker. Project representation is encouraged.
3. Consider Adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Greenbelt Fuel
Reduction Project to reduce the risk of wildfire within the City’s greenbelt
system; Applicant City of Monterey, Justin Prouty, Interim Urban Forester;
Open Space, Planned Community, and Residential Single-Family Zoning
Districts; Parks and Open Space General Plan Designation
4. Deny Appeal of 34 Cielo Vista Drive; Application AP-20-0249 Appealing
Architectural Review Committee Approval (Resolution A20-019) of
Architectural Review Permit ARP-20-0205 for a Second-Story Addition to an
Existing One-Story Single Family Dwelling; Appellant Nicolas W. Smith with
Horan Lloyd on behalf of Allen and Steffeny Tremain; Applicant Frank Dost,
Architect; Owner Mark Waite; R-1-10 Zoning District; Low Density Residential
General Plan Designation; Exempt from CEQA Per Article 19, Section 15301,
Class 1
RECESS 5:30 p.m.
RECONVENE
***Evening Session Agenda***
7:00 - 11:00 PM
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS
CONTINUED PUBLIC COMMENTS. At this time, the public may speak for a maximum of
three minutes on any subject which is within the jurisdiction of the Monterey Planning
Commission and which is not on the agenda. Any person or group desiring to bring an
item to the attention of the Commission may do so during Public Comments or by
addressing a letter of explanation to the Commission, City Hall, Monterey, CA 93940.
Public Comments are taken during the afternoon session and continued at the evening
session. Individuals may choose to speak once for up to three minutes at either session,
but not both.
PUBLIC APPEARANCE
Planning Commission
12/8/2020 4:00:00 PM
2
PUBLIC APPEARANCE items are reports on action or informational issues that might
stimulate public discussion, but that do not require formal noticing as public hearings.
You are welcome to offer your comments after being recognized by the Chair. The Chair
may limit the time allocated to each speaker.
5. Discuss the Draft City of Monterey Transportation Adaptation Plan, Provide
Input, and Gather Community Feedback (Not a Project under CEQA per
Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS
COMMISSIONERS may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or
make a brief report on his or her activities. In addition, a Commissioner may provide a
referral to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to
the body at a subsequent meeting concerning any City matter, or direct staff to place a
request to agendize a matter of business on a future agenda. (G.C. 54954.2)
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS
INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & STAFF COMMENTS supply information on activities or
announcements and may request clarification or direction regarding the scheduling of
meetings and study sessions.
6. Planning Office Update
ADJOURNMENT
ADJOURNMENT — The general policy of the Planning Commission is that the Afternoon Session
will end no later than 5:30 p.m. and the Evening Session will end no later than 11:00 p.m. Any
public agenda items that have not been completed within the designated adjournment time may
be formally extended by the Commission, or continued to the next regularly scheduled Planning
Commission Meeting, or continued to a Special Meeting.
Agenda packets may be reviewed by the public in the Monterey Public Library, in the Planning
Office, or on the web at http://www.monterey.org beginning late Friday afternoon prior to the date
of the meeting.
Members of the public have the right to address the Commission on any Agenda items. The Chair
will formally open the floor for public comment. However, if you wish to speak to items during
"Consent Agenda" or "Staff Informational Report," please advise the staff or the Chair prior to the
action on that item and you will be recognized. Notification as much in advance as possible is
appreciated.
Information distributed to the Commission at the meeting becomes part of the public record. A
copy of written material, pictures, etc. should be provided to the Secretary for this purpose.
Planning Commission decisions may be appealed within ten (10) days from the date of the
decision on forms available in the Planning Division during business hours. When the tenth day
falls on a weekend or a holiday, the appeal deadline date is the next working day following the
holiday or weekend. An appeal fee will apply. For more agenda information, call the Planning
Office at (831) 646-3885.
Planning Commission Meetings are cable cast live and videotaped for replay on Monterey's
Government Access Channel 25 by Access Monterey Peninsula (AMP).
CITY OF MONTEREY'S 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES:
Voicemail: (831) 646-3799
FAX: (831) 646-3793
Email: suggest@monterey.org
WebPage: http://www.monterey.org
Planning Commission
12/8/2020 4:00:00 PM
3
The City of Monterey is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs
and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special
assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (831) 646-
3935. Notification 30 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title
II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. For communication-related
assistance, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS
offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7
days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use
CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device.
MORE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE BY CALLING 646-3885
Planning Commission
12/8/2020 4:00:00 PM
4
Get email alerts for Monterey
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.