Muyni
← Back to Montpelier

Energy Advisory Committee

Regular Meeting

Montpelier, VT · February 18, 2014

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

Montpelier Energy Advisory Committee meeting notes 2/18/2014 Members present: Dan Jones, Dan Costin, Becky Wigg, Tim Shea, Barry McPhee, Alison Hollingsworth, Keil Corey, Anne Watson, Johanna Miller, Jim Stiles Others present: Jessica Edgerly-Walsh (SunCommon), Jessie Baker, Alex Prolman, Robert Dostis (Green Mountain Power), Hannah Reckhow, Barbara Conroy (Vermont Technical College), Laurie Feidler (Vermont State Employees Credit Union). Meeting called to order at 7:03pm 1. Minutes of previous meeting were approved. 2. Anne Watson Proposals for rules of procedures for MEAC Anne's hope: That we make our procedures “official”--question to the Committee: Is it important that we have some sort of organizational document akin to the Planning Commission's Rules of Procedure (http://www.montpelier-vt.org/page/303/.html). Dan C: Would be nice to have a similar level of responsibility as the Commission in terms of planning our energy infrastructure etc. Alison and Becky feel having a formalized structure would be nice. Dan C: Are there other energy committees in the state with bylaws? Joey: Yes; will provide sample bylaws of other energy committees. Dan C: Other documents besides Open Meeting Law that MEAC should be following? Jessie B.: Yes, ethics policy and others. Will circulate those documents with the group. Anne will work (with documents provided by Joey & Jessie) on synthesizing a document. Dan C. can help. Perhaps a document can be prepared by the next meeting? Barry: Concern about document retention; having a shared space where all MEAC documents can be held. Will follow up with Jessie, Alex and Hannah about what the City currently has and create some model for a centralized holding space. 4. Report on Solar City RFP RFPs have been reviewed, clarifying questions will be sent out to finalists shortly, before being brought in for interviews. 5. Report of Council meeting and approval of NZM and going forward Dan J: City Council presentation the week before was “delightfully and warmly received by the Council. We've been given a mandate to forge ahead with the net-zero project.” What partnerships would we like to pursue? Organizations with whom MEAC has working relationships: VTC, GMP, EAN, EVT, SunCommon, VSECU, others Robert: GMP will be launching a pilot project. To take a step back, this is about Montpelier launching this big ambitious net zero project, and GMP is only one partner in a much bigger process. Tangible projects GMP can offer at the start of this process: -heat pumps (rental program; no need for on-bill financing) -EV charging stations (Level 2) -group net-metered solar arrays for local environmental organizations (located on GMP property) -Partner with local car dealerships to offer E.V.s to GMP customers at 0% financing & no-money down? Many questions to be answered. Anne: How to package this for the public? This is a sort of 'menu of options'--menu could include offerings from other organizational partners too. When presenting, how about this: Full press conference, release, then after there's a sideshow devoted especially to each project individually so that each project gets full attention. What about a Net Zero Montpelier website? EAN is currently developing one; what if they also include resources for the other projects/partnerships? Joey: A fan of the idea of a big event that's still largely educational about what net zero is, what it'll take to get there, etc, alongside the tangible projects. Anne: When does this event happen? Jessica: Host it on a Monday, because T-F all the reporters (and John Hollar) are in the statehouse. So the soonest it can happen is the Monday after town meeting day. Tim, Robert: Bring Mary Powell on board, have her attend and make that public commitment. Joey: Can the sample projects be fully-baked and ready to go by March 10th? The goal of NZM itself, and a few little projects are enough of a press event; the whole thing doesn't have to be ready-to-go. Perhaps would be better to hint at a collection of things to come in addition to what's ready by that first date. Continuous rolling-out of projects. Laurie: VSECU might be putting an EV station into their new St. Johnsbury branch. Also, VSECU has the V-Green loan program, a “full suite of loan programs” that have discounted rates and extended terms for “green” projects. Laurie will talk with Robert later about ways to collaborate. Dan C: What about programs for efficiency improvements through EVT? Alison: EVT launched their pilot program for new commercial construction/full gutting & renovation two weeks ago. The program is composed of technical assistance and other incentives for certain complicated parts of building construction & renovation. However, EVT has the green light to get outside of their traditional box and start building programs that they haven't really explored yet. Possibility for growth. Also, sights are set on the Carr Lot project. Working with the City to (hopefully) enroll the Carr Lot into their pilot program. Back to the event: Robert will check with Mary & John about dates. Tim will contact Andrea Colnes to see if the dates work for her (and the website). Joey wants to make sure this has an educational component: Net Zero means “Conservation- Efficiency-Renewables-Transportation” etc. A visual is a good thing to have. Something (anything) to attract the TV cameras. Barbara: VTC students designed a project for a “sustainable Montpelier”...previously designed a Net Zero Carr Lot proposal; this is more comprehensive. Unsure how VTC can fit into these efforts; students can help somehow though. Research in some capacity? Jessica, SunCommon's plan: Piloting solar heat. Combine heat pumps with solar program; bring SunCommon in and audit your home, install solar panels and heat pumps at the same time. Heat pumps will be piloted in Waterbury, Montpelier and Rutland(?). Difference between SunCommon program and GMP program: SC—homeowners own the heat pump; GMP—GMP owns the heat pump and customers rent it. SC is hosting an event next week to promote their solar heat program w/VPIRG & others. MEAC will sponsor. Motion: MEAC will sponsor the event, and Dan Costin will speak at the event about our mission and how it relates. Back to the event again, regarding what projects are highlighted, which speakers etc. Jessica: Start with the headline you want to have in the papers the next day, then curate the speakers along those lines. Likely speakers: EAN, GMP, John Hollar, MEAC, EVT, maybe one or two more project partners? A concern about privileging SunCommon etc, other private parties with whom we've initially worked, as opposed to having an open process where any solar contractor can come and advertise. Workaround: “These are our initial partners, and the programs they're offering for this initiative. We're looking for more!” Next steps: An event-organizing team: Joey, Dan J., ~Anne W. Meeting was adjourned at 8:33pm

Agenda

MEAC Agenda 2-18-14 Meeting in the Memorial Room 7PM Tuesday Agenda 1. Minutes and new business 2. Introductions with Andrew Stein 3. Anne Watson Proposals for rules of procedure for MEAC 4. Report on Solar City RFP 5. Report of Council meeting and approval of NZM and going forward Coordination methodology with partner organization both profit and non profit EAN, Efficiency Vermont , VtTechnical College (Barbara C ) GMP stated, Possible: Suncommon, VSECU Setting up city announcement of NZM and the pilot projects with GMP Developing and announcing other partnership projects Do we need a public information sub committee? 6 Next steps with council and organizing priorities for NZM effort 7. Other business MEAC minutes January 21, 2014 Attending: Dan Jones, Johanna Miller, Alison Hollingsworth, Andi Colnes, Anne Watson, Becky Wigg, Kiel Corey, Alex Prolman, Jessie Baker, Tim Shea, Jim Stiles, Hannah Reckhow, Ken Jones, Jeff Fitzgerald, Barbara Congrey, Bill Neuberger Meeting called to order at 7:04 Motion to approve minutes (Becky) Seconded (Johanna) Status of Solar RFP process Anne gave an update on the Solar RFP review process: there are three top contenders, would like to ask them more questions (difficult to compare them), will schedule interview next week or so Pilot Projects with GMP Andrea gave an update. Through GMP/EAN connections, there is interest in starting pilot projects. John Hollar is in support, recommends presentation to city council that presents vision of NZM, GMP/EAN/MEAC partnership, and next level vision planning piece Elements of pilot: heat pump pilot (no upfront costs), solar net metering project (ppa), small building top wind turbines, solar-powered streetlamps, monitoring power usage (dashboard), electric vehicle chargers (tech assistance from city, GMP would pay) Next steps: by end of January we’ll get a list from GMP clarifying costs/mechanisms designed into 1 year kickoff, outreach to mayor and city council at next meeting, develop plan for press conference to launch it The next level planning could be like EAN decade milestones. Could we set milestones for MZN? The committee then discussed how the NZM project fits into MEAC’s overall vision and the role of MEAC with regard to role of City Council with large projects. Johanna: NZM is overarching goal, not a contract. Can be pursued with potential projects. MEAC just helps decide which project to choose. Alison: questions of jurisdiction – would GMP have to ask city council to start projects? No, it’d be for support. Different levels that city would serve Incorporation of Montpelier Master Plan in NZM Comparison of Master Plan and EAN report on NZM by Dan Costin Dan: shows how Master Plan and EAN report don’t quite line up (lack of ‘pathways’ to Master Plan goals) Anne and Alison expressed that they didn’t see that division. Ken: would like to see MEAC decide its role in big projects. Despite our skills there are topics that we cannot always cover. For example, with the District Heat project a Local Development Corp could be useful. Should MEAC take these huge things on? There are topics that we should seek out a professionalized approach? Andrea: yes it’s really big and complex, but I don’t think it will happen with big plan mapped out. It will happen with excitement and momentum. Some projects will be of the scale that MEAC can do thinking and some will be way too big. MEAC’s role will be to say ‘here you need professional assistance’. MEAC will need to set vision, provide guidance in one way or another. EAN is a professional resource. Anne: likes idea of a local development corp taking this on, district heat was going to be handed off anyway. Leave MEAC to do projects it’s excited about. Becky: being realistic about what MEAC can do, can’t sustain energy fair level of activity year after year. Advisory role is appealing, hands on when appropriate. Kiel: agrees with Becky, getting idea out there soon is important and letting it take shape as we go. Tim: we have vision, no more time needed discussing that. Can start to get projects underway. Be advisory. Educators. Creating opportunities. Liaisons with entities in community. Bill: withhold comments, nothing new to add Alison: NZM is nice umbrella to work under for many years, so we don’t need to redefine what we’re doing every year for every project. Fussing over definitions not useful. Let’s do stuff this year. Johanna: in my experience, best thing energy committees can do is to provide voice and energy. Let’s not lose that aspect. Dan: MEAC is instigator of project towards goals, and I hear more comfort with smaller projects. Andrea: So, things on table moving forward: talking with city council, GMP pilot, solar RFP, Netzero transportation hub, MEAC subcommittees Alison: ACEEE City Ranking as tool to instigate projects Jim: professionalization is part of picture to build capacity Johanna: Govenor’s award for environmental excellence, we should nominate ourselves Feb 13th Washington county energy committee The committee broke up into groups to brainstorm project Anne: will plan to work with Ken and Dan and Jim and Alex on LDC idea. Presentation to council? Dan: subcommitte was working on it, will call meeting within two weeks… Jim: in light of open meeting law, email archive would be more transparent. Jessie: happy to set up, but remember that meetings over email enable people to participate. Dan: Sen. Sanders will be back mid March.This would be a good occasion to have a NZM proposal. Allison: Would this committee manage money from grant? Dan: for city, submitted by city, but we could write it Tim: already have RFP, why not turn it into a grant? (3 mill?) Dan: Local benefit corp, could use tax credits Meeting ended at 8:29

Get email alerts for Montpelier

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting