Planning Commission
Regular MeetingMorgantown, WV · February 13, 2020
Minutes
MORGANTOWN PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
6:30 p.m. February 13, 2020 Council Chambers
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Peter DeMasters, Carol Pyles, Sam Loretta, Tim Stranko,
William Blosser, Ron Dulaney, and AJ Hammond
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Bill Petros, Michael Shuman
STAFF PRESENT: Christopher M. Fletcher, AICP
I. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL: DeMasters called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and
read the standard explanation of the how the Planning Commission conducts business
and rules for public comments.
II. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS: None.
III. MATTERS OF BUSINESS:
A. Approval of the December 12, 2019 meeting minutes. Stranko moved to approve as
presented; seconded by Blosser. Motion carried unanimously with Pyles and
Dulaney abstaining due to their absence.
B. Approval of the January 9, 2020 meeting minutes. Loretta noted was absent. Stranko
moved to approve the minutes with Loretta’s absence corrected; seconded by
Dulaney. Motion carried with Loretta and Pyles abstaining due their absence.
C. 2019 Annual Report to City Council. Fletcher reviewed WV State Code regulations
concerning the Planning Commission’s obligation to submit an annual report to City
Council. Fletcher noted the format of the report has been developed over several
years with additional information requested by the Planning Commission. Fletcher
asked the Planning Commission to authorize the City Manager to submit the Planning
Commission’s 2019 Annual Report to City Council. DeMasters noted Blosser had a
perfect attendance record. Stranko moved to submit the report to City Council as
presented; seconded by Hammond. The motion carried unanimously.
IV. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None.
V. NEW BUSINESS:
A. MNS20-01 / Adkins / 453 Civitan Street: Request by Chaille Adkins for minor subdivision
approval of property located at 453 Civitan Street. Seventh Ward Tax District, Tax Map 2,
Parcel 100; R-1, Single-Family Residential District.
Fletcher presented the Staff Report and noted the petitioner was present.
Morgantown Planning Commission Page 1 of 4
February 13, 2020 Minutes
DeMasters recognized Chaille Adkins, 1142 Windsor Avenue who noted he lives in Suncrest and he is
that he is trying to beautify the neighborhood. He has built two (2) houses in the Suncrest and is working
on a third. He stated that he feels the small variance he is asking for is not out of line. There are a lot
of other lots in the area that do not really conform to the R-1 District minimum lot frontage and minimum
lot area standards.
Stranko addressed the petitioner stating the Planning Commission has to apply the law, we don’t have
unfettered discretion. The Planning Commission has to find topographical or other conditions to the site
to allow the variance. Are there any topographical or other conditions peculiar to this site that the
Planning Commission can rely on to make this variance decision? Adkins stated he was not aware of
anything.
DeMasters addressed the petitioner noting that Junior Avenue has a lot of nonconforming parcels.
Civitan has two (2) nonconforming but there is one (1) house on that site. He asked what is across the
street. Fletcher stated that there are a couple of nonconforming parcels across the street. The petitioner
agreed with Fletcher. Adkins stated that in that general area and within a couple blocks around Civitan,
there are nonconforming parcels and that this information was provided with his application.
DeMasters referred to another lot across that has two lots, he asked if they were combined would that
a conforming lot. Fletcher confirmed it would. Fletcher pulled up the Monongalia County Parcel Viewer
website on his phone to look at the parcel subdivision pattern beyond the image provided in the Staff
Report. Fletcher noted that the block across the street is a triangular shaped block. Fletcher stated that
he sees nine (9) houses in the block immediately to the right. Of those nine (9) homes, only two (2)
appear to be on larger parcels. Seven (7) of them are appear to be on parcels that are smaller than the
R-1 District standards. DeMasters stated that he only asked this because he wanted to look at the entire
neighborhood.
Adkins stated that the 1315.07 Variances and Modifications says if someone can show where it creates
unnecessary hardship and that he thinks the strict appearance to this creates undue hardship on the
entire neighborhood to be able to grow. This house is almost derelict, and the prices of a single lot puts
undue hardship on the surrounding landowners to raise their property values. If that house just sits
there it is going to nothing.
DeMasters stated he understands it would provide undue hardship to the petitioner, but the Planning
Commission must look to the neighborhood as a whole. DeMasters stated has a hard time saying that
following the laws that we have is an undue hardship.
Adkins stated that the 7,200 square feet is an arbitrary number. He stated that getting to 7,200 square
feet is a weird dimension. DeMasters stated that a 70-mph speed limit is an arbitrary number also, but
it is the law.
Stranko noted City Council writes the Planning and Zoning Code, not the Planning Commission.
Blosser asked Fletcher at what point does a neighborhood go from R-1 to R-1A. Fletcher stated when
Council changes the zoning classification by amending the zoning map. Fletcher noted that the R-1
District has larger lots than R-1A. R-1 is a less dense development pattern than R-1A. R-1A has smaller
lots and smaller frontages. R-1A is still single-family but a denser development pattern.
Blosser noted that we are taking this neighborhood and putting two houses where one used to be. Pyles
thinks the value is in the size of the lot in that neighborhood. DeMasters stated that is why people go to
Morgantown Planning Commission Page 2 of 4
February 13, 2020 Minutes
Suncrest. Pyles noted that if you split it into the smaller lot, you are not following the character of the
neighborhood.
There being no further comments or questions by the Planning Commission, DeMasters asked if anyone
was present to speak in favor or in opposition to the petition. There being no comments, DeMasters
closed the public comment portion and asked for staff’s recommendation, which was read by Fletcher.
DeMasters asked if there was any discussion. Stranko stated that he is always trying to find a way to
work with the applicant, but the Planning Commission is obliged to follow the law. Stranko stated he
could not find a reason to support granting variance relief in this case and that the law is very clear.
DeMasters asked for a motion. Stranko moved to deny the application based on the fact the Planning
Commission was unable to identify topographical or other conditions peculiar to the site to justify
departures from the minimum lot area and minimum lot frontage standards for the R-1, Single-Family
Residential District without destroying the intent of said provisions; seconded by Blosser. The motion
carried unanimously.
DeMasters advised the petitioner the Planning Commission decision can be appealed as provided in
the City’s Planning and Zoning Code.
B. MNS20-02 / Callen / 3423 and 3427 Collins Ferry Road: Request by Michael Callen for
minor subdivision approval of property located at 3423 and 3427 Collins Ferry Road.
Seventh Ward Tax District, Tax Map 53, Parcels 125 and 126; R-1, Single-Family Residential
District.
Fletcher presented the Staff Report and not the petitioner was present.
DeMasters recognized Michael Callen, 3435 Collins Ferry Road who noted that the three (3) additional
lots meet the minor subdivision application. The frontage and square footage meet all R-1 zoning as
confirmed as note by Fletcher in the staff report.
There being not comments or questions by the Planning Commission, DeMasters asked if anyone was
present to speak in favor of or in opposition to the petitioner. There being no comments, DeMasters
closed the public comment portion and asked for staff’s recommendation, which was read by Fletcher.
Stranko moved to approve with staff recommended conditions; seconded by Dulaney. The motion
passed unanimously.
VI. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Committee Reports
• Traffic Commission Report: No report.
• Other Committees: No reports.
• Staff Comments: Fletcher stated that Staff is working on the overlay district
provisions for Study Area 5. Staff will be requesting a workshop to present this
information. Fletcher noted a workshop environment with discussion would be
more helpful before placing the matter on a future agenda. Staff will invite Mr.
Morgantown Planning Commission Page 3 of 4
February 13, 2020 Minutes
Metheny and the Wiles Hill neighborhood working group to observe. Staff’s
objective is to schedule the workshop following the Planning Commission’s March
business meeting.
VII. FOR THE GOOD OF THE COMMISSION:
Stranko asked if the GIS coordinator has made any progress with the county regarding
integrating the tax map information into the GIS plot viewer, we saw last month. Fletcher stated
that there is a working group that includes several GIS stakeholders in the area including the
county. Fletcher understands that the ultimate objective will be establishing a live connection
between the Assessor’s data with the City’s web app. The web app will be launched next week.
The City learned the County does not have the correct software licensing to establish the live
link, but the County is working to upgrade their software. In the interim, Marvin Davis, City GIS
Analyst is working with the County to include the City’s zoning data on the County Assessor’s
parcel viewer website.
Stranko also discussed code revisions for sidewalk development which is on the City Attorney’s
desk. Is there any progress on that? Fletcher stated that he will check with him. Fletcher noted
that he and City Engineer Damien Davis made a presentation to City Council at last month’s
Committee of the Whole meeting to make sure City Council was generally comfortable with the
concept. Stranko also asked about the GIS Analyst progress and asked if there was money in
the budget for this. Fletcher noted that it is a work in progress and that he is unsure of the
budget, but that it should be presented to City Council next month.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT: 7:02 PM
MINUTES APPROVED: March 12, 2020
COMMISSION SECRETARY: _____________________________
Christopher M. Fletcher, AICP
Morgantown Planning Commission Page 4 of 4
February 13, 2020 Minutes
Agenda
Morgantown Planning Commission
REGULAR MEETING PACKET
Thursday, February 13, 2020
6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
Planning Commissioners:
Peter DeMasters, 6th Ward
President
Carol Pyles, 7th Ward
Vice-President
Sam Loretta, 1st Ward
Tim Stranko, 2nd Ward
William Blosser, 3rd Ward
Bill Petros, 4th Ward
Michael Shuman, 5th Ward
AJ Hammond, Admin.
Ronald Dulaney, City Councilor
Development Services Department
Christopher M. Fletcher, AICP, Director
John Whitmore, AICP, Senior Planner
Intentional
Blank
Page
Planning Commission Pre-Meeting Announcement
Good evening and welcome to the regular/special meeting of the City of Morgantown
Planning Commission. Please turn off all cell phones or other devices that may disrupt
these proceedings. The Planning Commission conducts business in the following order:
(1) There will be a general public comment portion when anyone who wishes to
address the Planning Commission may do so, but only on matters that are not on
the agenda. There will be a five (5) minute time limit for speakers. All recognized
speakers must approach the podium, state their name and address for the record,
and speak clearly into the microphone. Speakers are notified that irrelevant
comments or comments of a personal nature or personal attacks may result in the
speaker forfeiting their opportunity to participate in the general public comment
portion.
(2) We review, amend, and approve minutes of the previous meeting.
(3) We consider any Unfinished Business from previous meetings.
(4) We move on to New Business items. First, we introduce the item and the Planning
Division representative presents the Staff Report.
(5) Next, we ask the petitioner to make a presentation. Planning Commissioners may
ask the petitioner questions at that time.
(6) I will then open a Public Hearing to hear testimony in support of, or in opposition to,
the request. Rules regarding public testimony are as follows:
(a) Anyone wishing to testify during the public hearing may do so once
recognized. Each recognized speaker must approach the podium, state their
name and address for the record, and speak clearly into the microphone.
(b) All comments must be addressed to the Commission. Speakers are notified
that irrelevant comments or comments of a personal nature or personal
attacks may result in the speaker forfeiting their opportunity to participate in
the public hearing.
(c) All speakers will be limited to five (5) minutes. If members of the Commission
have any questions of the speaker, that time will not be counted toward the
speaker’s five (5) minutes.
Morgantown Planning Commission Page 1 of 2
Pre-Meeting Announcement
PC Meeting Page 3 of 61 December 12, 2019
(d) If there is a large number of speakers, including many who are part of groups
or organizations, I may, to avoid repetitive comments, elect to ask for a
representative to speak on behalf of the group or organization.
(e) I may elect to recognize the applicant/agent at the end of the public hearing to
provide rebuttal or additional comments, which will be limited to five (5)
minutes. If members of the Commission have any questions of the
applicant/agent, that time will not be counted toward the applicant’s/agent’s
five (5) minutes.
(7) After all testimony is heard, I will declare the Public Hearing closed and no further
public comment will be permitted. At that time, no one in the audience may speak
again unless a Planning Commissioner asks a question. If someone is asked a
question, they must come to the microphone and identify themselves once again
before answering.
(8) Next, the Planning Commission will discuss and take action on the application.
(9) Once the vote is final, members of the audience who were present for that
particular case may leave, if they wish. In order not to disrupt the meeting, people
who choose to leave must go to the bottom of the stairs before carrying on a quiet
discussion.
(10) Uncivil, unruly, and/or disruptive behavior at any time during this meeting is
prohibited and will result in removal from this public meeting.
Thank you for your consideration and respect for these proceedings and the opinions of
all meeting participants.
Morgantown Planning Commission Page 2 of 2
Pre-Meeting Announcement
PC Meeting Page 4 of 61 December 12, 2019
MORGANTOWN PLANNING COMMISSION
February 13, 2020
6:30 p.m.
Council Chambers
President: AGENDA
Peter DeMasters, 6th Ward
Vice-President: I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Carol Pyles, 7th Ward
II. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS – concerning matters not on the agenda
Planning Commissioners:
Sam Loretta, 1st Ward III. MATTERS OF BUSINESS
nd
Tim Stranko, 2 Ward A. Approval of the December 12, 2019 meeting minutes.
William Blosser, 3rd Ward
B. Approval of January 9, 2020 meeting minutes.
Bill Petros, 4th Ward
C. 2019 Annual Report to City Council.
Michael Shuman, 5th Ward
Ronald Dulaney, City Council
IV. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None.
AJ Hammond, City Admin.
V. NEW BUSINESS:
A. MNS20-01 / Adkins / 453 Civitan Street: Request by Chaille Adkins for minor
subdivision approval of property located at 453 Civitan Street. Seventh Ward
Tax District, Tax Map 2, Parcel 100; R-1, Single-Family Residential District.
B. MNS20-02 / Callen / 3423 and 3427 Collins Ferry Road: Request by Michael
If you need an
accommodation,
Callen for minor subdivision approval of property located at 3423 and 3427
please contact Collins Ferry Road. Seventh Ward Tax District, Tax Map 53, Parcels 125 and
304-284-7431 or 126; R-1, Single-Family Residential District.
TDD 304-284-7512
VII. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Committee Reports
• Traffic Commission
• Other Committees
B. Staff Comments
VIII. FOR THE GOOD OF THE COMMISSION
Development Services
Christopher Fletcher, AICP
Director
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Planning Division
John Whitmore, AICP
Senior Planner
389 Spruce Street
Morgantown, WV 26505
304.284.7431
Page 1 of 1
Intentional
Blank
Page
MORGANTOWN PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
6:30 p.m. December 12, 2019 Council Chambers
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Peter DeMasters, Sam Loretta, Tim Stranko, William Blosser,
Bill Petros, Michael Shuman and AJ Hammond
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Carol Pyles, Ronald Dulaney
STAFF PRESENT: Christopher M. Fletcher, AICP
I. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL: DeMasters called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and
read the standard explanation of the how the Planning Commission conducts business
and rules for public comments.
II. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS: None.
III. MATTERS OF BUSINESS:
A. Approval of the Tuesday, October 08, 2019 meeting minutes. Motion to accept as
presented by Stranko; seconded by Shuman. Motion passed unanimously with
Hammond abstaining due to his absence.
B. Approval of the Wednesday, October 30, 2019 meeting minutes. Motion to accept as
presented by Stranko; seconded by Shuman. Motion passed unanimously with
Petros and Hammond abstaining due to their absence.
IV. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None.
V. NEW BUSINESS:
A. MNS19-17 / Dunham / 644 Madison Avenue: Request by Paul Dunham for
minor subdivision approval of property located at 644 Madison Avenue. First Ward
Tax District, Tax Map 40, Parcel 274; R-1A, Single-Family Residential District.
Fletcher presented the Staff Report and noted staff was representing the applicant.
There being no comments or questions by the Planning Commission, DeMasters asked if anyone
was present to speak in favor of or in opposition to the petition. There being none, DeMasters
closed the public hearing and asked for staff’s recommendation, which was read by Fletcher.
Staff recommends approval of the subdivision with the following conditions:
Stranko moved to approve MNS19-17 as requested with Staff recommended conditions;
seconded by Petros. Motion carried unanimously.
Morgantown Planning Commission Page 1 of 5
December 12, 2019 Minutes DRAFT
B. RZ19-05 / Colonial Office Associates / 3208 University Avenue: Request by
Michael Callen on behalf of Colonial Office Associates for a Zoning Map
Amendment to reclassify 3280 University Avenue from R-1, Single-Family
Residential District to B-2, Service Business District. Seventh Ward Tax District,
Tax Map 7, Parcel 267.
Fletcher presented the Staff Report and noted the petitioner’s representative was present.
DeMasters recognized Vince Kolanko, who is representing the property owners. Kolanko shared
observations of other professional office buildings in the Suncrest area that have been sitting
empty for several years. The owners are looking for more walk-in type businesses. As an
example, Rising Creek Bakery is locating a small bakery and coffee shop at the site. This is the
type of businesses the property owners are interested in attracting to the site. Three out of four
of the property’s owners live within a quarter mile of the site and they want to offer businesses
that residents can walk to. The rezoning would be an economic boost for tax purposes for the
city.
Stranko noted that what Kolanko described is a B-1 neighborhood district and he is inclined to
favor that alternative. Have you looked at the B-1 constraints and feel that would be adequate?
Kolanko stated that would be adequate, but they would prefer the B-2 classification as several
businesses are listed as conditional uses in the B-1 District. Stranko clarified that conditional
uses allow the neighbors to be informed and participate in determining whether a conditional use
is appropriate for a particular site. Kolanko mentioned a small wellness center, yoga and
massage are listed as conditional uses in the B-1 District and the owners feel those would be
appropriate businesses for the site. Stranko noted conditional uses are reviewed by the Board
of Zoning Appeals. Stranko noted that the Planning Commission must review zoning map
amendments in the abstract, not as who owns the property now or what their development
intentions are but look at the parcel and its future impact on the surrounding area.
Petros asked if the building was currently fully occupied. Kolanko noted it was not and have lost
a few tenants. Kolanko noted that office space continues to be vacant and continues to be
constructed. It is getting tougher to get office uses into this building. Empty buildings, like the
Wedgewood buildings, is not good for taxes and this is what is happening now. Mon Health
systems owns the Wedgewood buildings now and they cannot sell or occupy them right now.
Loretta asked the Fletcher for clarification on the prohibition of parking between the front of the
building and the street in both the B-1 and B-2 Districts. They way this building is set up, parking
is located in the front. Fletcher noted existing parking would be considered a pre-existing
nonconforming condition that could continue until abandoned. Abandonment would occur if the
building sat empty and those parking spaces were not used for a period of 12 months or more.
At that point, the property most likely need to be redeveloped. Or, if the use of the parking spaces
were abandoned, the tenant looking to move into the building would have to seek variance relief
to use those parking spaces.
There being no further comments or questions by the Planning Commission, DeMasters opened
the public hearing asking if anyone was present to speak in favor of this petition. There being
know, DeMasters asked if anyone was present to speak in opposition of this petition.
DeMasters recognized Dan Powell. Powell stated he and his live at 3272 University Avenue.
Thank you for the privilege to speak to the group. Page 35 shows my home, directly adjacent
Morgantown Planning Commission Page 2 of 5
December 12, 2019 Minutes DRAFT
to the property in reference. I would like to speak against the proposed zoning changes. The
subject property is surrounded by R-1 and B-2 would be detrimental. Potential lack of privacy,
noise and odors. We have no distrust of the owners but agree with Mr. Stranko that future
owners could use this in other ways.
DeMasters asked if they had looked at the list of land uses permitted in the B-1 District. Powell
stated that the B-1 permitted land use list is much more palatable. We agree with the Staff
Report that the property works as a buffer, and we are thankful for the property as it presently
exists. We would likely not speak against B-2 zoning.
There being no further public comments, DeMasters closed the public hearing and asked for
staff’s recommendation, which was read by Fletcher.
Loretta asked if the zoning for property is reclassified to B-1 or B-2, what happens with the
grandfathered parking in the front of the building. Fletcher noted nonconforming conditions run
with the land and is not related to the ownership of the property.
Petros asked if the Planning Commission could discuss PRO verse B-1. Petros is concerned
with the diversity of uses permitted in the B-1 District. Petros understands the City cannot control
what happens in the county, referring to the adjacent gas station mini mart use, and that recent
redevelopment along the corridor outside the city is not a valid argument for the Planning
Commission to consider. DeMasters agreed that would not be a valid argument to support the
Planning Commission’s recommendation to reclassify the property. Petros sees this site as a
high-profile piece of land on University Avenue and a much better place then Wedgewood for a
professional office building, which is probably consistent with its occupation over time.
Stranko noted that was an excellent question and asked Fletcher for confirmation that there are
far more permitted uses in the B-1 District than the PRO District. Fletcher confirmed and noted
the PRO District is less about the small-scaled retail offerings and more office related uses.
Fletcher noted that a PRO District classification would be a better representation of what the
property has been for so long but would not provide additional flexibility to diversify the
commercial offerings there. Fletcher noted the development standards are significantly different
from PRO to B-1 or PRO to B-2.
Stranko asked the Planning Commission to consider the B-1 option as a means of making the
property more marketable for tenants because he would like to see the building filled and active.
Secondly, all these B-1 options are walkable business that are growing in other neighborhoods.
DeMasters reminded the Commission that zoning map amendments include highest and best
use considerations. Is the highest and best use for this property B-1, B-2, or PRO. Fletcher
confirmed and noted that if the Planning Commission was leading toward exploring the PRO
option, staff did not consider that and are not prepared to provide a complete comparative
analysis to have an informed discussion of that option. Fletcher suggested that if the Planning
Commission would like to explore the PRO designation, it table that matter to allow staff to
prepare materials for the Planning Commission’s January meeting. The development standards
in PRO are very different than B-1. The permitted land use table is good information, but review
and consideration of the PRO development standards is important to review.
Stranko asked Fletcher to confirm that the B-1 classification gives the owners more flexibility to
market and occupy that property. Fletcher confirmed. Fletcher noted again that he would
Morgantown Planning Commission Page 3 of 5
December 12, 2019 Minutes DRAFT
characterize a PRO designation as representing what the site has been and the applicant is
seeking a zoning reclassification because PRO permitted uses are no longer attracted to the
building given current vacancies there are experiencing.
Stranko noted that all the medical office buildings that were located all over town are being
consolidated by the large hospital corporations. Stranko is concerned that a PRO designation
will put them in no better position than they are now to get that property marketed and occupied.
DeMasters said he agreed.
Petros noted there are also dentist offices that have opened up two blocks away. Petros noted
is concern is do we want this to look like Star City or do we want it to look like what Morgantown
has on the other side of the corridor because its all houses going up that hill.
Stranko noted that he wants a zoning designation that adequately protects the R-1 adjoining
properties and also activates this property to be convenient and useful neighborhood amenity.
Stranko noted that he this this will be accomplished with a B-1 zoning designation.
DeMasters noted that small neighborhood business enjoyed in his neighborhood has gotten
people out and about supporting the businesses and this area could use something like this.
DeMasters sees this potential opportunity with a B-1 zoning classification but not as a PRO
District classification. It adds something to the neighborhood.
Petros is concerned with the hours of operation permitted in the B-1 District and sitting next to
an R-1 District and concerns with evening noise, etc.
DeMasters agreed but provided an example of a business in his neighborhood. The old Bailey’s
grocery store. Madeline Marie’s is now in there and it’s a restaurant. Its busy and you can’t get
a table in the small space. It attracts people in the neighborhood. It’s a nice thing to go to.
Stranko noted Petros makes an excellent point and that there is a risk, but he thinks the benefit
and possible upside outweighs the risk.
Fletcher noted the purpose of the B-1 District is clearly to be in the neighborhood and scaled
accordingly. Fletcher read the purpose statement of the B-1 District provided in the Planning
and Zoning Code. The B-1 zoning district is by design intended to be located in the middle of or
at the edge of a single-family residential district. Fletcher also noted several of the nonresidential
uses permitted in the B-1 District require conditional use approval, which includes an extra layer
of public participation.
Stranko moved to forward a recommendation to City Council to refuse the application to change
the zoning designation of B-2 for the subject property and recommend the zoning map be
changed from R-1, Single-Family Residential District to B-1, Neighborhood Business District.
Motion seconded by Blosser. The motion carried unanimously.
VI. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Committee Reports
• Traffic Commission Report: No report.
• Other Committees: No reports.
Morgantown Planning Commission Page 4 of 5
December 12, 2019 Minutes DRAFT
• Staff Comments:
Fletcher noted there will be a meeting in January. The only item on the agenda
requiring advance public notification is modifying the overlay district boundary as
was recently completed for the zoning district boundaries. Fletcher noted there
may be a minor subdivision petition that could be included on the January agenda.
Fletcher reminded the Planning Commission that the election of its leadership for
2020 will also be on the agenda.
Question regarding the MPO Pedestrian and Bike plan. Staff will discuss, reach
out to the traffic commission and find out if there is a workshop.
• Planning and Zoning Code will be making some changes with the sidewalk
requirements. This will more than likely be on the January or February meeting.
VII. FOR THE GOOD OF THE COMMISSION
Stranko asked about the MPO’s recent Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan and how the
Planning Commission can help advance implementation, even amending the
Comprehensive Plan if needed. Stranko asked if the City was involved in the project.
Fletcher noted the City Engineer’s Office is very involved serving on several project
committees.
Fletcher noted the City Attorney is working on several code revisions to advance sidewalk
development, some of which will come to the Planning Commission for consideration,
most likely in February.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT: 7:24 PM
MINUTES APPROVED:
COMMISSION SECRETARY: _____________________________
Christopher M. Fletcher, AICP
Morgantown Planning Commission Page 5 of 5
December 12, 2019 Minutes DRAFT
Intentional
Blank
Page
MORGANTOWN PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
6:30 p.m. January 9, 2020 Council Chambers
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Peter DeMasters, Sam Loretta, Tim Stranko, William Blosser,
Michael Shuman, Ron Dulaney, and AJ Hammond
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Bill Petros, Carol Pyles
STAFF PRESENT: Christopher M. Fletcher, AICP
I. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL: DeMasters called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and
read the standard explanation of the how the Planning Commission conducts business
and rules for public comments.
II. ELECTION OF LEADERSHIP: Stranko nominated the Peter DeMaster as President and
Carol Pyles as Vice-President for another term; seconded by Dulaney. There being no
other nominations, the nominations were closed. The motion carried unanimously.
III. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS: None.
IV. MATTERS OF BUSINESS:
Approval of the December 12, 2019 meeting minutes were postponed.
V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None.
VI. NEW BUSINESS:
A. RZ20-01 / Administrative / Overlay Zoning Districts: Administratively
requested realignment of Overlay Zoning Districts on the “Official Zoning Map” to
reflect Monongalia County Assessor’s digitized tax parcel mapping and to remedy
cartographic errors in the current overlay district boundaries
Fletcher presented the Staff Report.
Stranko asked Fletcher to take a minute to remind the Planning Commission of the purpose and
importance of overlay districts and why our citizens may be interested in these designations.
Fletcher explained that overlay districts are a tool that is used to either make the development
standards and/or the land uses slightly different than the base zoning district underneath of it.
Additional development standards can be included, which is very much the case in the Sunnyside
overlay districts from architectural standards, the types of permitted land uses, development
performance standards, etc. They also can be used to provide greater flexibility. For instance,
in Sunnyside the base zoning districts require a larger front setback, or larger rear setback. If
Morgantown Planning Commission Page 1 of 3
January 9, 2020 Minutes DRAFT
higher density is desired, which is there, then those setbacks are decreased so development
can be pursued at a more intense pattern. Sometimes the question arises about changing the
base zoning district, a lot of the areas where we use overlay districts it is usually covering multiple
base zoning districts. We want to continue to observe these base zoning districts, to regulate
and manage, but just add either incentives or greater restrictions to achieve what the
comprehensive plan is desiring for those particular areas.
Dulaney asked how the revised boundary was decided for the Sunnyside Central Overlay
District. Fletcher replied that at the intersection of Beverly Avenue and 6th Street, there is one
building down there, possibly a duplex. Looking at the existing overlay district, it is not clear
whether the intention was to include that property or not. The properties to the north of that wrap
around 6th Street extension, the overly district did not include any structures north of the one
previously mentioned. What we did, was just pulled the boundary south to include properties
that face Beverly on both sides of the street. From a physical standpoint, it makes sense to
include the way it was done to emulate what was around it.
Dulaney suggested that landowners impacted by this boundary adjustment should be notified.
Fletcher noted the Planning Commission can decide to include these parcels in the Sunnyside
Central Overlay District as a part of its recommendation to City Council.
DeMasters asked if anyone was present to speak in favor of or in opposition to the petition.
There being none, DeMasters closed the public hearing and asked for staff’s recommendation,
which was read by Fletcher.
Demaster’s asked for a motion to submit a recommendation to amend the overlay district
boundaries to City Council with the modification to include the parcels noted by Dulaney in the
Sunnyside Central Overlay District. Stranko made a motion and seconded by Dulaney. Motion
carried unanimously.
B. TX20-01 / Administrative / Sidewalk Requirements: Administratively requested zoning
text amendments to remove sidewalk development standards from the Morgantown
Planning and Zoning Code and placing related standards in Article 913 “Sidewalks” of
Morgantown City Code. Planning and Zoning Code Sections included are 1333.07(E),
1335.07(E), 1337.07(E), 1339.07(E), 1341.07(I), 1343.07(G), 1345.07(F), 1347.07(F),
1353.07(E), and 1361.03(L).
Fletcher presented the Staff Report.
DeMaster’s wanted to clarify that what the Planning Commission is being asked to do is
recommend to City Council that all sidewalk related development requirements and standards
be removed from the Planning and Zoning Code and placed in another section of City Code,
Article 913, which is outside the scope of the Planning Commission. Whatever City Council
decides to do with the sidewalks would be out of the Planning Commission’s hands. That being
said, when the Planning Commission reviews site plans, how will the provision of sidewalks be
addressed. Fletcher stated the development of sidewalk could be addressed through conditions
included in site plan approvals. The rules and regulations that will development under Article
913 for sidewalks will require the developer to address these facility as a part of the site plans
presented to the Planning Commission.
Morgantown Planning Commission Page 2 of 3
January 9, 2020 Minutes DRAFT
Fletcher clarified that under the Planning and Zoning code, the City only requires sidewalks to
be constructed when there is a new development, construction, or significant redevelopment.
This has proven to be a reactive means of developing sidewalks. Earl Core Road is a perfect
example. We have a lot of new sidewalks along this corridor, but you walk on a new segment of
sidewalk, then on a berm, or have no pedestrian path to walk on. A proactive approach would
be to plan for and construct sidewalks as a comprehensive network, which is the intention of
removing the sidewalk development requirements and standards from the Planning and Zoning
Code and placing them in Article 913 of City Code. The City Attorney is still working on Article
913 revisions and the City Engineer and Planning staff are working on a classification system for
sidewalks similar to a roadway classification.
Fletcher noted Staff is working to tie all these City Code modifications together to ensure there
is no time gap between the current requirements and the new requirements. If City Council
decides not to pursue the comprehensive changes, then the current Planning and Zoning Code
requirements would stay in place.
There being no further comments or questions by the Planning Commission, DeMasters asked
if anyone was present to speak in favor of or in opposition to the petition. There being none,
DeMasters closed the public hearing and asked for staff’s recommendation, which was read by
Fletcher.
Demasters asked for a motion to approve. Stranko motioned to approve; seconded by
Hammond. The motion carried unanimously.
VII. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Committee Reports
• Traffic Commission Report: No report.
• Other Committees: No reports.
• Staff Comments:
Fletcher asked if he could give a demonstration of the online zoning map that should be live in a
couple of weeks. The City’s GIS Analysist Marvin Davis is developing this new tool following
the Planning Commission’s and City Council’s recent updates to the City’s Official Zoning Map.
A link will be placed on the City’s website. Zoning district, and some Planning and Zoning Code
elements, like the permitted land use table, will be available through the online mapping tool.
The only spatial data we are unable to incorporate presently is the County’s tax parcel mapping.
The City is working with the County to integrate this data in the future.
VIII. FOR THE GOOD OF THE COMMISSION:
IX. ADJOURNMENT: 7:27 PM
MINUTES APPROVED:
COMMISSION SECRETARY: _____________________________
Christopher M. Fletcher, AICP
Morgantown Planning Commission Page 3 of 3
January 9, 2020 Minutes DRAFT
Intentional
Blank
Page
2019 ANNUAL REPORT
Planning Commission
The West Virginia State Code Chapter 8A-2-11 requires Planning Commissions to:
“Make an annual report to the appropriate governing body concerning the operation of the planning
commission and the status of planning within its jurisdiction.”
The Morgantown Planning Commission respectfully submits this 2019 Annual Report to the
Morgantown City Council.
Morgantown Land Use Planning Milestones
1944 .............. City Council adopted first Zoning Ordinance
1959 .............. West Virginia Planning Enabling Act Adopted
1961 .............. City’s First Comprehensive Plan Adopted
1970 .............. Comprehensive Plan Updated
1979 ............. First City Planner Hired
1999 .............. Comprehensive Plan Update Adopted
2006 .............. Planning & Zoning Code Modernized and Codified
2010 .............. Downtown Strategic Plan Update Adopted
2013 .............. Comprehensive Plan Update Adopted
2016 .............. Small Area Plan – Future Study Area No. 17
2017 .............. Small Area Plan – Future Study Area No. 2
2018 .............. Small Area Plan – Future Study Area No. 18
2018 .............. Small Area Plan – Future Study Area No. 16
2019 .............. Small Area Plan – Future Study Area No. 5
2019 Planning & Zoning Cases
The following table illustrates the caseload for the Planning Commission and Board of Zoning
Appeals during the 2017, 2018, and 2019 calendar years.
PC BZA Number of Applications 2019 Actions
2017 2018 2019 Pending Approved Denied W/drawn
Site Plans (DSI) 3 2 1 1
Minor Subdivisions 18 22 17 17
Major Subdivisions 0 0 0 0
Map Amendments 3 3 5 1 4
Text Amendments 12 7 1 1
Variances 42 44 41 41
Conditional Uses 10 9 4 4
Administrative Appeals 3 2 0 0
TOTAL 91 89 69 1 68
2019 Morgantown Planning Commission Page 1 of 7
Annual Report to City Council
Citizen Planners
The success of local planning policies, programming, and services depends largely on the
commitment and integrity of residents appointed by the Morgantown City Council to serve on
various planning-related commissions, boards, and committees. Morgantown is fortunate to enjoy a
well-informed public willing to serve in the role of “Citizen Planner.” The following table identifies
these volunteers and their respective terms as of December 31, 2019.
Date of Original Tenure
Citizen Planner Current Term
Appointment (in months)
Planning Commission
Peter DeMasters, President
03/21/2006 01/01/17 – 12/31/19 164
6th Ward Representative
Carol Pyles, Vice-President
09/17/2008 01/01/19 – 12/31/21 135
7th Ward Representative
Sam Loretta
06/20/2006 01/01/18 – 12/31/20 161
1st Ward Representative
Tim Stranko
03/21/2007 01/01/18 – 12/31/20 152
2nd Ward Representative
William Blosser
11/05/2013 01/01/17 – 12/31/19 73
3rd Ward Representative
William Petros
01/19/2010 01/01/19 – 12/31/21 119
4th Ward Representative
Michael Shuman
08/04/2009 01/01/19 – 12/31/21 124
5th Ward Representative
Ron Dulaney Jr. City Council term
07/01/2017 ending 06/30/21
30
City Councilor
AJ Hammond
11/20/19 at the will of City Manager 1
Administration Representative
PC Tenure Summary: Total: 959 mos. or 79.9 yrs. Average: 106.6 mos. or 8.9 yrs.
Board of Zoning Appeals
Harrison Case 2/21/2017 01/01/17 – 12/31/19 35
Kevin Meehan 10/17/2017 01/01/19 – 12/31/21 27
Chris Benison 12/5/2017 01/01/18 – 12/31/20 24
Heidi Cook 03/20/2018 01/01/18 – 12/31/20 21
Garrett Tomblin 01/9/2019 01/01/19 – 12/31/21 12
BZA Tenure Summary: Total: 119 mos. or 9.9 yrs. Average: 23.8 mos. or 2 yrs. +/-.
2019 Morgantown Planning Commission Page 2 of 7
Annual Report to City Council
The following table identifies attendance trends for the 2017, 2018, and 2019 calendar years. One
(1) Planning Commission meeting was canceled in 2019 due to the lack of cases to review and
consider.
2017 2018 2019 Three-Year
Citizen Planner Attendance
Absent Present Absent Present Absent Present Rate
Planning Commission
Peter DeMasters
1 10 3 7 1 10 84%
6th Ward Representative
Carol Pyles
4 7 3 7 4 7 66%
7th Ward Representative
Sam Loretta
0 11 1 9 0 11 97%
1st Ward Representative
Tim Stranko
2 9 2 8 0 11 88%
2nd Ward Representative
William Blosser
0 11 0 10 0 11 100%
3rd Ward Representative
William Petros
2 9 3 7 1 10 81%
4th Ward Representative
Michael Shuman
5 6 4 6 0 11 72%
5th Ward Representative
Ronald Dulaney, Jr.
1 5 0 10 3 8 72%
City Councilor
AJ Hammond
N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 1 100%
Administration Representative
Board of Zoning Appeals
Harrison Case 1 8 3 8 2 10 81%
Kevin Meehan 0 2 1 10 1 11 92%
Chris Benison N/A N/A 0 11 0 12 100%
Heidi Cook N/A N/A 0 9 1 11 95%
Garrett Tomblin N/A N/A N/A N/A 3 8 75%
2019 Morgantown Planning Commission Page 3 of 7
Annual Report to City Council
2019 Building Permits and Construction Value
The following table identifies building permit and construction value (nominal) trends for the 2017,
2018, and 2019 calendar years as tracked and report by the City’s Code Enforcement Department.
2017 2018 2019
%
% %
No. / Value No. / Value Chang No. / Value
Change Change
e
No. of Building Permits Issued 1,910 22.8% 1,680 -12.0% 1,805 7.0%
Total Construction/
$36,267,943 9.9% $20,644,918 -43.1% $30,246,880 47.0%
Improvement Value
Total Amount of Building
Permit Related Fees Paid to $206,042 2.5% $161,668 -21.5% $212,461 31.0%
the City
Planned Unit Developments (PUDs)
As of December 31, 2019, there have been seven (7) Planned Unit Development (PUD) Outline
Plans recommended by the Planning Commission and approved by City Council. The following
status for each PUD is provided in accordance with Article 1357.03(D)(4)(c) of the Planning and
Zoning Code.
The Square at Falling Run, SC Bodner, Westminster House, and Beech View Place Planned Unit
Developments were completed. Grand Central Apartments was originally approved in 2007 but
rescinded by ordinance in 2010. Habitat for Humanity was originally approved in 2009 but
rescinded by ordinance in 2012, and lands subsequently developed as single-family housing. Glen
Ridge Apartments was originally approved in 2015 but rescinded by ordinance in 2017. These
PUDs were rescinded because development was not initiated prior to respective Outline Plan
Approval deadlines. The City of Morgantown has not received an application for a Planned Unit
Development since the Glenn Ridges Apartment PUD Outline Plan in August 2015.
2019 Planning Accomplishments and 2020 Planning Work Program
• City of Morgantown 2017-2019 Strategic Plan – In December 2017, City Council finalized a
strategic plan to serve as a road map guiding its vision toward implementing significant,
measurable and attainable improvements. The Planning Commission and/or Development
Services Department staff have direct or indirect roles in contributing to the following strategic
goals and objectives.
Attractive Amenities
Objective 1: Continue to revitalize the riverfront
Promote infill and redevelopment in the Wharf District
UPDATE/STATUS – The Planning Division continues to engage potential development interest
for the reuse of existing buildings and new construction.
2019 Morgantown Planning Commission Page 4 of 7
Annual Report to City Council
Cooperative Relationships
Objective 1: Leverage and expand intergovernmental relationships
Develop relationships with other political entities for cooperative service delivery
UPDATE/STATUS – The Planning Division continues to contribute to the Morgantown-
Monongalia Metropolitan Planning Organization (MMMPO) through active membership on its
Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC). Additionally, staff attends, as
appropriate, meetings of the City’s Housing Advisory Commission and the City’s Bicycle Board.
Excellent City Services
Objective 3: Promote collaborative code enforcement
Evaluate appropriate staffing assignments and levels to address code violations
UPDATE/STATUS – Additional funding was allocated by City Council in the FY2019 City Budget
to increase Planning Division staff by one (1) full-time equivalent position in the third quarter of
the fiscal year. Recruitment to fill the newly created Zoning Compliance Inspector position will
be initiated in February 2020.
Quality Development
Objective 1: Promote strategic community development
Provide updates of the comprehensive plan implementation regularly
UPDATE/STATUS – An administrative zoning text amendment was recommended by the
Planning Commission and approved by City Council in JUL 2019 addressing single-family
residential design standards related to front-loaded garages. The objective of these text
amendments is to ensure new construction maintains an inviting human scale where exterior
design emphasizes the dwelling unit rather than what is typically observed as the last attractive
element: the garage.
Vibrant Downtown
Objective 1: Encourage the continued enhancement and diversity of the downtown area
Utilize the Main Street Market Data Study. Encourage diversity in downtown development,
businesses, and activities.
UPDATE/STATUS – Construction was substantially completed in 2019 at 461 High Street
(former Dairy Queen) by SunCap Development offering three (3) new tenant spaces (Chipotle,
Chase Bank, and TBD) and new mixed-used dwellings above. Additionally, The Mills Group, a
local architecture firm, acquired and made significant progress in substantially renovating the
building at 88 High Street (former City Office Equipment).
Attainable Housing
Objective 1: Promote quality and diversification of housing
Research tools to increase affordable housing through inclusionary and incentive zoning practices
UPDATE/STATUS – $30,000 is budgeted in FY 2019 to engage a firm to identify home
ownership and rental housing market gaps and establish related policy and programming
recommendations. A firm was selected in 2019 and project completion is expected in Summer
2020.
Under the direction of the City Manager’s Office, the Planning Division will continue to develop
and undertake implementation strategies in 2020 intended to advance these goals and
objectives accordingly.
2019 Morgantown Planning Commission Page 5 of 7
Annual Report to City Council
• Small Area Studies – Strategies NH 1.2 and ED 5.7 of the 2013 Comprehensive Plan Update
provides for the preparation and implementation of small area studies for 16 “Future Study
Areas”, which are identified in Appendix A of the Plan. Planning projects were completed in
2019 for Study Area No. 5 with the report received by the Planning Commission in October
2019. Further zoning map and text amendments related to the study area are anticipated for
early 2020.
• Modernization of Subdivision Regulations – The Planning Commission and City Council
completed the lengthy task of modernizing and codifying the City’s zoning regulations in 2006.
The fundamental purpose of this endeavor was to implement progressive land use policies and
strategies as well as comply with the State Legislature’s similar effort in 2004 to modernize the
State’s Planning Enabling Law. Changes in State Code have created opportunities to
streamline the review and approval of subdivision petitions. Incorporating these opportunities in
Morgantown’s Planning and Zoning Code requires a major amendment to the City’s subdivision
regulations. City Council allocated $75,000 in FY 2019 to complete this project. A related
request for proposals will be published in the first quarter of 2020 Calendar Year, with project
completion anticipated within 9 to 12 months.
• Geographic Information System (GIS) – The Monongalia County Assessor’s Office maintains
a web-based GIS parcel viewer [https://ags.agdmaps.com/wv/mon/]. The Planning Division has
completed the laborious task of editing the City’s zoning district boundaries to align with the
County’s GIS-based parcel mapping boundaries. Amendments to the Official Zoning Map were
recommended for approval by the Planning Commission under Case Number RZ19-04 in
September 2019 and approved by the City Council under Ordinance 19-29. Further
amendments to the Official Zoning Map are anticipated to be enacted in early 2020 to related to
Overlay Districts. Additionally, General Fund resources were programmed in 2019 with
direction given by the City Manager’s Office to recruit a full-time GIS professional, outsourced
technical support, and acquire necessary hardware and software to launch an integrated City
GIS. Marvin Davis joined the City of Morgantown as a GIS Analyst in September 2019.
• Richwood-Willey Intersection Report – In February 2018, the Planning Commission accepted
the Small Area Plan and Recommendations Report for Future Study Area No. 2. A
transportation operational study of the Richwood Avenue and Willey Street intersection was
recommended, the completion of which by the Morgantown-Monongalia Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MMMPO) occurred in June 2019. Discussions with West Virginia Division of
Highways and other stakeholders on completion of recommended improvements are ongoing.
• Morgantown Regional Bike and Pedestrian Transportation Plan – The City of Morgantown
in conjunction with the City of Westover, Monongalia County, MMMPO, West Virginia
Department of Transportation, and West Virginia University assisted in the completion of the
Morgantown Regional Bike and Pedestrian Transporation Plan, coordinated by Alta Planning
and Design and Stantec. The plan document is anticipated to be completed in 2020, with an
executive summary provided in November 2019. Initial findings from the executive summary
have provided the City of Morgantown with data beneficial in modifying the existing sidewalk
construction requirements and methods, with Planning Commission recommendation and
Council action occurring in early 2020.
2019 Morgantown Planning Commission Page 6 of 7
Annual Report to City Council
• 2023 Comprehensive Plan Update – In hopes of building on the collaborative success of the
2013 Comprehensive Plan Update process, City Administration began the process of securing
multi-year funding commitments from the Morgantown-Monongalia Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MMMPO), the Monongalia County Commission, and neighboring municipalities.
This will align with the timing of the MMMPO’s next Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and
publication of the 2020 decennial census data. Funding has been requested over three fiscal
years in the City’s Capital Escrow Account.
2019 Morgantown Planning Commission Page 7 of 7
Annual Report to City Council
Intentional
Blank
Page
MORGANTOWN PLANNING COMMISSION
February 13, 2020
6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
President: STAFF REPORT
Peter DeMasters, 6th Ward
CASE NO: MNS20-01 / Adkins / 453 Civitan Street
Vice-President:
Carol Pyles, 7th Ward
REQUEST and LOCATION:
Planning Commissioners: Request by Chaille Adkins for minor subdivision approval of property located at 453
Sam Loretta, 1st Ward Civitan Street.
Tim Stranko, 2nd Ward
TAX MAP NUMBER (s) and ZONING DESCRIPTION:
William Blosser, 3rd Ward
Seventh Ward Tax District, Tax Map 2, Parcel 100; R-1, Single-Family Residential District.
Bill Petros, 4th Ward
Michael Shuman, 5th Ward
SURROUNDING ZONING:
Ronald Dulaney, City Council
R-1, Single-Family Residential District.
AJ Hammond, City Admin.
BACKGROUND and ANALYSIS:
The petitioner seeks to subdivide Parcel 100 into two (2) parcels. Addendum A of this
report illustrates the subject site.
Parcel 274 includes all of Lots 26, 27 and 28 of Block No. 4 of the East Fairfield Addition
subdivision. Each of the two (2) proposed parcels will have 60-foot of frontage along
Civitan Street as illustrated in the staff enhanced image below:
Parcel 1
Development Services
Christopher Fletcher, AICP
Director Parcel 2
John Whitmore, AICP
Senior Planner
Planning Division
389 Spruce Street
Morgantown, WV 26505
304.284.7431
Page 1 of 4
MORGANTOWN PLANNING COMMISSION
February 13, 2020
6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
President: Both proposed parcels would be of equal dimensions (60’ x 110’), with an approximate
Peter DeMasters, 6th Ward area of 6,600 square feet. The parcels will not meet the minimum frontage standard [70
feet] or minimum area standard [7,200 square feet] for the R-1 District, as provided in the
Vice-President: following graphic from Section 1333.03 of the Planning and Zoning Code.
Carol Pyles, 7th Ward
Planning Commissioners:
Sam Loretta, 1st Ward
Tim Stranko, 2nd Ward
William Blosser, 3rd Ward
Bill Petros, 4th Ward
Michael Shuman, 5th Ward
The waiver provision would not apply to this subdivision as Civitan Street is a city accepted
Ronald Dulaney, City Council
roadway and public right-of-way. Accordingly, the proposed subdivision will require
AJ Hammond, City Admin. variances by the Planning Commission in accordance with Section 1315.07 of the
Planning and Zoning Code, as shown below.
The following is a summary of the parcel configuration patterns within the combined block
(East Fairfield Addition Block Nos. 4 and 13):
• There are 18 R-1 District classified parcels within the combined block.
• 5 of the 7 parcels fronting Civitan Street appear to meet the minimum R-1 District
frontage and area standards.
• With regards to the 2 nonconforming parcels fronting Civitan Street, Parcels 10.1
and 12 are occupied by one single-family dwelling. This principal building is also
Development Services
considered nonconforming as it is situated on 2 separate parcels.
Christopher Fletcher, AICP
Director • Of the 11 parcels fronting Junior Avenue, only 4 appear to meet the R-1 District
minimum frontage and area standards.
John Whitmore, AICP
Senior Planner
The following image illustrates the parcel configuration patterns within the combined block.
Planning Division
389 Spruce Street
Morgantown, WV 26505
304.284.7431
Page 2 of 4
MORGANTOWN PLANNING COMMISSION
February 13, 2020
6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
President:
Peter DeMasters, 6th Ward
Vice-President:
Carol Pyles, 7th Ward
Planning Commissioners:
Sam Loretta, 1st Ward
Tim Stranko, 2nd Ward
William Blosser, 3rd Ward
Bill Petros, 4th Ward
Michael Shuman, 5th Ward
Ronald Dulaney, City Council
AJ Hammond, City Admin.
Development Services
Christopher Fletcher, AICP
Director
John Whitmore, AICP
Senior Planner
Planning Division
389 Spruce Street
Morgantown, WV 26505
304.284.7431
Page 3 of 4
MORGANTOWN PLANNING COMMISSION
February 13, 2020
6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
President: STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Peter DeMasters, 6th Ward Section 1315.07 requires the Planning Commission to determine that the departure does
not destroy the intent of the provision for which the variance or modification is requested;
Vice-President:
in this case, the minimum frontage standard and minimum area standard. Additionally,
Carol Pyles, 7th Ward
the Planning Commission must state the reason on which the departure was justified.
Planning Commissioners: Staff recommends the following justification considerations when considering granting the
Sam Loretta, 1st Ward requested subdivision variance or modification:
Tim Stranko, 2nd Ward • Over 70% of development fronting Civitan Street within the combined block meets
William Blosser, 3rd Ward or exceeds the R-1 District minimum lot frontage and area standards.
Bill Petros, 4th Ward • The only two (2) parcels fronting Civitan Street that do not meet R-1 District
Michael Shuman, 5th Ward minimum lot frontage and area standards is joined as one premises containing one
Ronald Dulaney, City Council
single-family dwelling.
AJ Hammond, City Admin. • Staff is unaware of nor has the petitioner provided substantiated topographic or
other conditions peculiar to the site necessitating a variance from R-1 District
minimum lot frontage and area standards.
• Both proposed parcels will have 10 feet less than the R-1 District minimum lot
frontage standard and 600 square feet less than the R-1 District minimum lot area
standard.
Staff provides no recommendation as to whether the proposed subdivision should be
approved.
In the event the Planning Commission finds favorable reasoning to justify departure from
the minimum lot frontage and lot area standards and approve the subdivision, staff
recommends the following conditions be included:
1. That the petitioner submit at least three (3) original final plat documents, including
all access/utility easements if applicable, signed and sealed by a surveyor licensed
in the State of West Virginia for the Planning Commission President’s signature; and,
2. That the final plat is recorded at the Monongalia County Courthouse within thirty (30)
days of receiving the executed plat.
Development Services
Christopher Fletcher, AICP Enclosure: Application and accompanying exhibits
Director
John Whitmore, AICP
Senior Planner
Planning Division
389 Spruce Street
Morgantown, WV 26505
304.284.7431
Page 4 of 4
STAFF REPORT ADDENDUM A
MNS20-01 / Adkins / 453 Civitan Street
Clipped from Google Maps
Clipped from Google Maps
Staff Report Addendum A Page 1 of 2
MNS20-01
STAFF REPORT ADDENDUM A
MNS20-01 / Adkins / 453 Civitan Street
Monongalia County Assessor’s Office
Staff Report Addendum A Page 2 of 2
MNS20-01
Intentional
Blank
Page
MORGANTOWN PLANNING COMMISSION
February 13, 2020
6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
President:
Peter DeMasters, 6th Ward STAFF REPORT
Vice-President: CASE NO: MNS20-02 / Callen / 3423 and 3427 Collins Ferry Road
Carol Pyles, 7th Ward
REQUEST and LOCATION:
Planning Commissioners:
Sam Loretta, 1st Ward Request by Michael Callen for minor subdivision approval of property located at 3423 and
3427 Collins Ferry Road.
Tim Stranko, 2nd Ward
William Blosser, 3rd Ward
TAX MAP NUMBER (s) and ZONING DESCRIPTION:
Bill Petros, 4th Ward
Seventh Ward Tax District, Tax Map 53, Parcels 125 and 126; R-1, Single-Family
Michael Shuman, 5th Ward
Residential District.
Ronald Dulaney, City Council
AJ Hammond, City Admin. SURROUNDING ZONING:
R-1, Single-Family Residential District.
BACKGROUND and ANALYSIS:
The petitioner seeks to subdivide parcels 126 and 125 into three (3) parcels. Addendum
A of this report illustrates the subject site.
The proposed subdivision would result in three (3) equally sized and spaced parcels as
shown in the staff enhanced image below:
Development Services
C
B
Christopher Fletcher, AICP
Director
John Whitmore, AICP
A
Senior Planner
Planning Division
389 Spruce Street
Morgantown, WV 26505
304.284.7431
Page 1 of 3
MORGANTOWN PLANNING COMMISSION
February 13, 2020
6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
President:
Each parcel will be approximately 83.33’ in width and 87 feet in depth for an area of
Peter DeMasters, 6th Ward
7,249.71 square feet +/-, in excess of the R-1 District minimum lot size standard.
Vice-President:
Carol Pyles, 7th Ward The parcels will front on a private roadway established under minor subdivisions MNS19-
07 and MNS19-08. The staff report [without appendices], 09 May 2019 Planning
Commission meeting minutes, and the action letter related to those subdivisions are
Planning Commissioners: attached in Addendum B of this report.
Sam Loretta, 1st Ward
Tim Stranko, 2nd Ward As the parcels will be served by a right-of-way, the minimum lot frontage standard may be
William Blosser, 3rd Ward
waived as provided in Section 1333.03(B) of the Planning and Zoning Code:
Bill Petros, 4th Ward
Michael Shuman, 5th Ward
Ronald Dulaney, City Council
AJ Hammond, City Admin.
As requested by staff, the petitioner has submitted a letter from the West Virginia Division
of Highways confirming that, “it is not felt [by WVDOH] that three additional home will
adversely affect the operation of the previously permitted driveway [for Case Nos. MNS19-
07 and MNS19-08]. Said letter dated 14 JAN 2020 is appended hereto.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the proposed subdivision be approved as requested with the following
conditions:
1. That, if not already completed, the two (2) single-family principle buildings and any
accessory structures thereto located on Parcels 125 and 126 of Tax Map 53, must
be razed and removed;
2. That final right-of-way easement location and design dimensions must be approved
in writing by the City Engineer and the City Fire Marshall, in accordance with MNS19-
08 / Bossio / 3431 and 3435 Collins Ferry Road;
Development Services 3. That the petitioner shall furnish to the Office of the City Manager a performance bond
Christopher Fletcher, AICP that assures the City that the subdivide, his/her heirs, successors and assigns, their
Director agent or servants will faithfully perform and complete the work of constructing and
installing improvements as determined by the City Engineer (e.g., roadway,
John Whitmore, AICP
Senior Planner
sidewalks, water, sanitary sewer, stormwater, etc.). Further, such performance bond
shall:
Planning Division a. Run to the City of Morgantown.
389 Spruce Street
b. Be in an amount of the estimated construction cost of the ultimate installation of
Morgantown, WV 26505 improvements as determined by the City Engineer.
304.284.7431
c. Specify the time for the completion of installation of the improvements.
Page 2 of 3
MORGANTOWN PLANNING COMMISSION
February 13, 2020
6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
President:
4. That the petitioner submit at least three (3) original final plat documents, including
Peter DeMasters, 6th Ward
all access/utility easements, if applicable, signed and sealed by a surveyor licensed
Vice-President: in the State of West Virginia for the Planning Commission President’s signature; and,
Carol Pyles, 7th Ward
5. That the final plat is recorded at the Monongalia County Courthouse within thirty (30)
days of observing the conditions set forth above and after receiving the executed
Planning Commissioners: plat.
Sam Loretta, 1st Ward
Tim Stranko, 2nd Ward
William Blosser, 3rd Ward
Bill Petros, 4th Ward Enclosure: Application and accompanying exhibits
th
Michael Shuman, 5 Ward
Ronald Dulaney, City Council
AJ Hammond, City Admin.
Development Services
Christopher Fletcher, AICP
Director
John Whitmore, AICP
Senior Planner
Planning Division
389 Spruce Street
Morgantown, WV 26505
304.284.7431
Page 3 of 3
COMBINED STAFF REPORT ADDENDUM A
MNS20-02 / Callen / 3423 and 3427 Collins Ferry Road
Clipped from Google Maps
Clipped from Google Maps
Staff Report Addendum A Page 1 of 2
MNS20-02
COMBINED STAFF REPORT ADDENDUM A
MNS20-02 / Callen / 3423 and 3427 Collins Ferry Road
Part of Tax Map 53
Staff Report Addendum A Page 2 of 2
MNS20-02
STAFF REPORT ADDENDUM B
MNS20-02 / Callen / 3423 and 3427 Collins Ferry Road
Table of Contents
MNS19-07 and MNS 19-08 Page 2 of 9
Combined Staff Report
May 9, 2019 Page 6 of 9
Planning Commission Minutes
MNS19-07 and MNS 19-08 Page 8 of 9
Approval letter
Page 1 of 9
STAFF REPORT ADDENDUM B
MNS20-02 / Callen / 3423 and 3427 Collins Ferry Road
Page 2 of 9
STAFF REPORT ADDENDUM B
MNS20-02 / Callen / 3423 and 3427 Collins Ferry Road
Page 3 of 9
STAFF REPORT ADDENDUM B
MNS20-02 / Callen / 3423 and 3427 Collins Ferry Road
Page 4 of 9
STAFF REPORT ADDENDUM B
MNS20-02 / Callen / 3423 and 3427 Collins Ferry Road
Page 5 of 9
STAFF REPORT ADDENDUM B
MNS20-02 / Callen / 3423 and 3427 Collins Ferry Road
Page 6 of 9
STAFF REPORT ADDENDUM B
MNS20-02 / Callen / 3423 and 3427 Collins Ferry Road
Page 7 of 9
STAFF REPORT ADDENDUM B
MNS20-02 / Callen / 3423 and 3427 Collins Ferry Road
Page 8 of 9
STAFF REPORT ADDENDUM B
MNS20-02 / Callen / 3423 and 3427 Collins Ferry Road
Page 9 of 9
Get email alerts for Morgantown
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.