Planning Commission Agendas
Regular MeetingMoses Lake, WA · July 13, 2023
Minutes
DRAFT
CITY OF MOSES LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
OF JULY 14, 2022
Commissioners Present: Nathan Nofziger (Chair), Charles Hepburn (Vice Chair), Eric
Skaug, Susan Tao
Commissioners Absent: Gary Mann
Staff Present: Community Development Director Kirsten Sackett, Planning Manager
Vivian Ramsey, Senior Planner Nathan Pate, and Planning Technician Michelene
Torrey
The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance was called by Secretary
Michelene Torrey. Commissioner Mann was absent. Vice Chair Hepburn moved to
excuse the commissioner’s absence; the motion was seconded by Commissioner
Skaug. Passed unanimously.
Item # 1- Approval of Minutes from June 16, 2022 Meeting
Vice Chair Hepburn moved to approve the minutes; this motion was seconded by
Commissioner Skaug. Passed Unanimously.
Item #2- Public Hearing- Annexation Request for Maple Landing
The commission reviewed an annexation request from Maple Landing LLC for a
property located near Grape Dr. There were two public comments, both individuals were
residents of the Space St. area that was included in the proposed boundary lines as set
by City Council. Both public commentors stated they would be unwilling to connect to
city services and the properties should remain the county.
Vice Chair Hepburn moved to recommend to Council the annexation request with
the exception of the residential lots on Space St, effectively making the annexed
area a “T”.
Seconded by Eric Skaug, motion passed unanimously.
.
Staff and Commission Questions and Comments:
DRAFT
CDD Sackett informed the commission of the updated process for the Comprehensive
Plan and the steps staff, and the consultants will be taking to review the UGA boundaries
and the Comprehensive Plan.
Meeting adjourned at 6:49PM by Chair Nofziger.
Agenda
City of Moses Lake
Planning Commission Agenda
REMOTE ACCESS OPTION and IN PERSON UPDATE: Citizens can join this meeting remotely
by calling the numbers listed or via internet at https://cityofml.zoom.us/j/98138492478
Call In: 1 253 215 8782 ID: 981 3849 2478. Persons requesting to address the Planning
Commission from the remote option will need to complete the online speaker request form*
before 3 p.m. on the day of the meeting.
Thursday July 13, 2023 @ 6PM
Council Chambers
401 S Balsam St., Moses Lake, WA
1. Call to Order / Roll Call
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Approval of Minutes: June 8, 2023 and July 3, 2023
4. Commission Business
a. Covered Parking Interim Controls
b. Review of Public Par�cipa�on Plan for Development Code Rewrite
c. SMP Limited Amendment Exemp�on List
• Single Family Residence Appurtenances
5. Other Business
a. Short Course Training Video – Comprehensive Planning Basics
6. Administra�ve Reports
a. Development Project Update PowerPoint
b. Next mee�ng assignment - Review of Development Code Division I
7. Public Comment for Non-Agenda Items
8. Adjournment
City of Moses Lake
Planning Commission Minutes
of July 3, 2023
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Nofziger at 3:00 p.m.
2. Roll Call
Commissioners Present: Nathan Nofziger (Chair), Charles Hepburn (Vice Chair), Gary Mann,
Adam Weber
Commissioners Absent: Charles Hepburn (Vice Chair), Susan Tao
Staff Present: City Attorney Katherine Kenison, Community Development Director Kirsten
Sackett, Planning Manager Vivian Ramsey, Senior Planner Nathan Pate, and Associate Planner
Amy Harris
3. Agenda Items
Strevy Shoreline Permit
Pursuant to RCW 42.30.140(2) and, to the extent applicable, RCW 42.30.110(l)(i), the meeting
was moved to a closed session at 3:07 pm for the purpose of continued review of a quasi-judicial
land use matter presented to the Planning Commission during their meeting of June 8, 2023.
4. Adjournment of Closed Session: 3:56 pm
5. Open Session: 3:57pm
Discussion was held on developing a work plan to review potential amendments to the SMP.
6. Adjourned Open Session: 4:24 pm by Chair Nofziger.
CITY OF MOSES LAKE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
July 13, 2023 (Thursday)
6:00 PM
Civic Center – Council Chambers
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
THRU: Kirsten Peterson, Community Development Director
FROM: Nathan Pate AICP, Senior Planner
DATE: July 7, 2023
RE: Introduction of Ordinance No. 3026 adopting interim land use regulations
and official controls pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390
for open surface parking within the R-1 Residential Zoning Districts, and
the Planning Commission Work Plan
SUMMARY: On May 23, 2023, the Moses Lake City Council adopted Ordinance No.
3026 (Attachment A) adopting interim land use regulations and official controls pursuant
to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390 for covered parking within the R-1
Residential Zoning District. As required and to be perfected, the interim land use
regulations and official controls must meet minimum processing standards which
include the preparation and implementation of the “Planning Commission Work Plan”
(Attachment B). The ordinance included, but is not limited to, the following:
1. The City of Moses Lake Municipal Code 18.20.050 Development Standards for
Residential Zones within the R-1 Zoning District, requires a minimum of one
required covered parking spaces (in a garage or carport constructed to the
standards of the State Building Code), in addition to off-street parking required in
Chapter 18.54.
2. The City of Moses Lake Municipal Code requires parking pursuant to MLMC
18.54.040 - Two (2) required parking stalls per unit for single-family homes
(including manufactured homes).
3. The City of Moses Lake Municipal Code requires every parcel of land hereafter
used for parking purposes shall be developed and permanently maintained in
accordance with the Code requirements.
4. The following amendments are hereby adopted:
A. Moses Lake Municipal Code 18.20.050 Development Standards for
Residential Zones
within the R-1 Zoning District, Table 2: Development Standards In Residential
Zones:
Planning Commission 7/13/2023 – Interim Control Introduction and Work Plan Page 1 of 2
“Minimum required number of covered11 parking spaces, in addition to off-street
parking
required in Chapter 18.54.”
Table 2, Footnote #11:
11. In a garage or carport constructed to the standards of the State Building
Code.
ANALYSIS: The Planning Commission is being asked to begin the public outreach and
deliberations to develop recommendations for a final Code Amendment that addresses
residential parking standards regarding structures.
Attachments:
1. Ordinance No. 3026
2. Planning Commission Work Plan
Planning Commission 7/13/2023 – Interim Control Introduction and Work Plan Page 2 of 2
ORDINANCE 3026
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOSES LAKE, WASHINGTON,
RELATING TO COVERED PARKING WITHIN R-1 RESIDENTIAL
ZONED PROPERTY, ADOPTING INTERIM LAND USE REGULATIONS
AND OFFICIAL CONTROLS PURSUANT TO RCW 35A.63.220 AND RCW
36.70A.390 FOR OPEN SURFACE PARKING WITHIN THE R-1
RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY,
AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Recitals:
1. The City of Moses Lake Municipal Code 18.20.050 Development Standards for Residential
Zones within the R-1 Zoning District, requires a minimum of one required covered parking
spaces (in a garage or carport constructed to the standards of the State Building Code), in
addition to off-street parking required in Chapter 18.54; and
2. The City of Moses Lake Municipal Code requires parking pursuant to MLMC 18.54.040 -
Two (2) required parking stall per unit for single-family homes (including manufactured
homes); and
3. The City of Moses Lake Municipal Code requires every parcel of land hereafter used for
parking purposes shall be developed and permanently maintained in accordance with the
Code requirements; and
4. The City of Moses Lake is working toward the Growth Management Act Periodic Update
(RCW 36.70A.130) – Comprehensive Plan / Code update; and
5. On May 9, 2023, during a regular City Council meeting, the Council instructed the
Community Development Department to address a citizen’s request to allow the use of
garage space for habitable space; and
6. The City of Moses Lake finds that use of a residential structure should not be limited; and
7. The City of Moses Lake finds that required covered parking is extraneous; and
8. The City of Moses Lake finds that within residential zones there is a limited or declining
supply of day care options; and
9. The City Council finds that the proposed interim development and zoning regulations are
reasonable and necessary in order to further implement the full use of residential structure
to accommodate day care facilities, and are therefore in the public interest; and
10. The need for day care facilities create a time sensitive emergency requiring the adoption of
an interim zoning ordinance; and
Page 1 of 4
Document Ref: MFAAH-KEH9B-ABQNA-RYEZ9 Page 1 of 4
11. The City is authorized to impose interim land use controls for up to one (l) year if a work
plan is developed for related studies providing for such longer periods pursuant to RCW
35A.63.220 and RCW 36.704.390; and
12. A public hearing on these interim regulations will be scheduled within 60 days of ordinance
adoption, pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOSES LAKE, WASHINGTON ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The Recitals set forth above are hereby adopted and incorporated
as Findings of Fact of the City Council.
Section 2. Additional Findings. The Council may adopt further additional findings after the public
hearing is held and evidence presented to the City Council.
Section 3. This purpose of this ordinance is to:
A. Promote expansion of needed day care facilities; and
B. Allow for the full use of residential structures for day care facilities; and
C. Accommodate the growing need and demand for day care facilities and service.
Section 4. The following amendments are hereby adopted:
A. Moses Lake Municipal Code 18.20.050 Development Standards for Residential Zones
within the R-1 Zoning District, Table 2: Development Standards In Residential Zones:
“Minimum required number of covered11 parking spaces, in addition to off-street parking
required in Chapter 18.54.”
Table 2, Footnote #11:
11. In a garage or carport constructed to the standards of the State Building Code.
Section 5. Appeals. Interim controls are not subject to appeal.
Section 6. Public Hearing. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70.390, the City Council
will hold a public hearing on this interim ordinance to take public testimony.
Section 7. Duration of Interim Regulations. The interim amendments adopted by this ordinance
shall remain in effect until six (6) months from the effective date and shall automatically expire
unless the same are extended as provided in RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW 35A.63.220 prior to that
date, or unless the same are repealed or superseded by permanent amendments prior to that date.
Section 8. Planning Commission Work Program. The City of Moses Lake Planning Commission
is hereby directed to review the interim regulations in 2023. The Commission shall make a
Page 2 of 4
Document Ref: MFAAH-KEH9B-ABQNA-RYEZ9 Page 2 of 4
recommendation on whether said amendments, or some modification thereof, should be
permanently adopted. The Moses Lake Planning Commission is directed to complete its review,
to conduct such public hearings as may be necessary or desirable, and to forward its
recommendation to the Moses Lake City Council prior to the expiration of the interim
amendments. The work program shall include input from wireless carriers, existing franchisees,
and City staff.
Section 9. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court, board or tribunal of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance.
Section 10. Enforcement. Violations of this ordinance are enforceable to the same extent as other
violations of Title 18 MLMC and are equally subject to injunctive and other forms of civil relief
that the City may seek.
Section 11. Conflict. In the event that there is a conflict between the provisions of this ordinance
and any other City ordinance, the provisions of this ordinance shall control.
Section 12. Declaration of Emergency. The Moses Lake City Council hereby finds and declares
that an emergency exists which necessitates that this ordinance become effective immediately in
order to preserve the public health, safety and welfare of the City of Moses Lake, pursuant to RCW
35A.13.190.
Section 13. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect
immediately upon passage, as set forth herein.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Moses Lake, WA and signed by its Mayor on May
23, 2023.
_____________________________________
Don Meyers, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Debbie Burke, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
Katherine L. Kenison, City Attorney
Page 3 of 4
Document Ref: MFAAH-KEH9B-ABQNA-RYEZ9 Page 3 of 4
Martinez Swartz Myers Fancher Madewell Eck Skaug
Vote: Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye Absent Aye
Date Published: May 30, 2023
Date Effective: May 23, 2023
Page 4 of 4
Document Ref: MFAAH-KEH9B-ABQNA-RYEZ9 Page 4 of 4
Signature Certificate
Reference number: MFAAH-KEH9B-ABQNA-RYEZ9
Signer Timestamp Signature
Katherine Kenison
Email: kkenison@basinlaw.com
Sent: 25 May 2023 20:45:27 UTC
Viewed: 25 May 2023 21:27:10 UTC
Signed: 25 May 2023 21:27:32 UTC
Recipient Verification: IP address: 173.209.171.7
✔Email verified 25 May 2023 21:27:10 UTC Location: Moses Lake, United States
Mayor Don Myers
Email: dmyers@cityofml.com
Sent: 25 May 2023 20:45:27 UTC
Viewed: 26 May 2023 13:26:12 UTC
Signed: 26 May 2023 13:26:53 UTC
Recipient Verification: IP address: 67.21.180.215
✔Email verified 26 May 2023 13:26:12 UTC Location: Moses Lake, United States
Debbie Burke
Email: dburke@cityofml.com
Sent: 25 May 2023 20:45:27 UTC
Viewed: 26 May 2023 15:36:26 UTC
Signed: 26 May 2023 15:36:46 UTC
Recipient Verification: IP address: 63.135.54.162
✔Email verified 26 May 2023 15:36:26 UTC Location: Moses Lake, United States
Document completed by all parties on:
26 May 2023 15:36:46 UTC
Page 1 of 1
Signed with PandaDoc
PandaDoc is a document workflow and certified eSignature
solution trusted by 40,000+ companies worldwide.
WORK PLAN:
Interim Controls to remove the requirement for covered parking within the R-1
Residential Zoning District 2023.
Task Time frame Responsible
Staff
Develop outreach and public information July 1 – July Planner
20
Circulate interim regulations to developers, July 20-June 8 Planner
industry experts, City staff and impacted
developers for review and comments
Draft Final regulations June 8-June Planner
12
Review regulations w/ Planning Commission July Planner
(NOTE below time frame may be reduced or
expanded subject to public interest)
Public outreach / workshop w/PC (multiple as August Planner
needed)
Circulate updated Code for Comment Estimate- Planner
- SEPA review August /
- Sixty-day state agency review September
Planning Commission Review/Recommendation Estimate- Planner
September /
October
City Council Review/Adoption Estimate- Planner
October /
November
CITY OF MOSES LAKE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
July 13, 2023 (Thursday)
6:00 PM
Civic Center – Council Chambers
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Kirsten Peterson, Community Development Director
DATE: July 7, 2023
RE: Review of Development Code Public Participation Plan
SUMMARY:
Following adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in late 2021, and guidance from the
Department of Commerce (see attachment) the City then began to formulate plans for
updating the Development Code regulations into One unified Development Code. At present,
the applicable code provisions are broken out into several section of the Municipal Code,
specifically in Titles 14 through 20. The intention with a new code is to combine all
development regulations into one Title.
In 2021 the City entered into a contract with SCJ Alliance to aid in the drafting of the new code.
Staff members from Community Development, with participation from other department as
necessary, have been meeting with the consultants on a regular basis to review the draft code
regulations.
We have reached a point where the majority of the code has been drafted, and we will soon
be seeking input and participation from the public. The status of the development code re-
write is found within the attached Working Code Outline. This document gives an overview
of each new Division of the Code, along with the status as of the beginning of June. The Draft
Code is under regular review by Staff and the consultants, and the Outline is updated on a
regular basis.
The next step for the Planning Commission is to review and provide recommendations on a
public participation plan (PPP). Following a recommendation from the Planning Commission,
the PPP will be presented to City Council for consideration and potential adoption.
The intention of the PPP is to ensure that the city is offering a variety of avenues for members
of the public to review the document and provide input. Not only is it in the best interests of
the City to ensure this type of participation, but broad public participation is also a requirement
found with RCS 36.70A.140.
Planning Commission 7/13/2023 – Review Development Code Public Participation Plan Page 1 of 2
The public participation effort is intended to achieve specific desired outcomes, which include:
• A public involvement process that provides clear information to the public on the purpose
of the Development Code and how the update process works;
• Public meetings and events designed to provide opportunities for all interested parties to
be heard, and for people to listen and learn from one another;
• Broad participation of all interested groups and individuals regardless of point of view;
• A transparent process which clearly documents all public input and makes it available for
any and all to review; and
• Improve the decision making process to include the interests and needs of stakeholders
At a minimum the City will be hosting workshops, and eventually public hearings, with both
the Planning Commission and City Council. However, before we arrive at the point of public
hearing and adoption, the City wants to make every effort to provide for ample participation
from the public. Staff will be designing a series of events that will include stakeholder
workshops, open house events, presentations to existing community groups, boards, and
non-profit organizations, and participation at existing community events. A variety of methods
for engagement will also be utilized, from offering paper copies of the draft Code for review,
to the use of online community engagement tools to allow for broad public participation.
Following review of the PPP by the Planning Commission, Staff anticipates presenting the
PPP to Council for review at their July 25 meeting.
ANALYSIS: The Planning Commission is being asked to begin the public outreach and
deliberations to develop recommendations for a final Code Amendment that addresses
residential parking standards regarding structures.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Accept, revise and/or augment the Public Participation Plan.
Attachments:
1. Dept of Commerce letter, dated December 14, 2021
2. Working Code Outline
3. Draft PPP
Planning Commission 7/13/2023 – Review Development Code Public Participation Plan Page 2 of 2
CITY OF MOSES LAKE
DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
INTRODUCTION
Following adoption of the City of Moses Lake Comprehensive Plan in late 2021, and upon
guidance from the Department of Commerce, the City then began to formulate plans for
updating the Development Code regulations into One unified Development Code. At present,
the applicable code provisions are broken out into several section of the Municipal Code,
specifically in Titles 14 through 20. The intention with a new code is to combine all
development regulations into one Title.
The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires local governments to create and broadly
disseminate a Public Participation Plan.
The purpose of this Plan is to identify the desired outcomes of the City of Moses Lakes’ public
participation plan, the approach, audiences, schedule and opportunities for public
participation. This document may be updated over time to reflect the needs that arise during
the update project, and the experience in early outreach, to ensure that public participation is
effective.
DESIRED OUTCOMES
The public participation effort is intended to achieve specific desired outcomes, which include:
• A public involvement process that provides clear information to the public on the purpose
of the Development Code and how the update process works;
• Public meetings and events designed to provide opportunities for all interested parties to
be heard, and for people to listen and learn from one another;
• Broad participation of all interested groups and individuals regardless of point of view;
• A transparent process which clearly documents all public input and makes it available for
any and all to review; and
• Improve the decision making process to include the interests and needs of stakeholders
AUDIENCES
There are several audiences that will participate in the Development Code re-write and each
will become engaged in the process in different way:
• Community members: Moses Lake residents, property owners and business owners
• Stakeholders: Developers, contractors, and other users of the Development code
• Elected and appointed officials: City councilmembers, Planning Commissioners and
other city commission/board members as needed.
• Non-city service providers, such as: Grant County Transit, Port of Moses Lake, Grant
County PUD, etc.
• Non-governmental organizations such as: Chamber of Commerce, Economic
Development Moses Lake Downtown Association, and various service oriented clubs
(Rotary, Kiwanis, etc.)
• State, regional and other local governments, such as: Grant County, Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT), Commerce, Ecology, Fish and Wildlife
(DFW), and Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP), and the Coleville Tribes.
ROLE OF DECISION MAKERS
City Council
The City Council will provide policy guidance and is the final decision maker for adopting the
Development Code update. Council members will be notified of all public activities and
events. All public workshops, hearings, and other activities with the City Council will be noticed
appropriately. The City Council will receive periodic briefings throughout the update process
and will review Planning Commission recommendations. City Council will hold a public
hearing on the final draft of the updated Comprehensive Plan prior to taking action.
Planning Commission
The Planning Commission will provide policy recommendations for the Development Code
update and will assist in ensuring the public is involved throughout the process. Planning
Commission members will be notified of all community activities and events. All public
workshops, hearing, and other activities with the Planning Commission will be noticed
appropriately. The Planning Commission will review drafts of the update on a section by
section basis, providing opportunities for public comments, and will provide feedback and
recommendations to City staff. The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the
Development Code update before forwarding its final recommendation to City Council.
Community Development Department
City of Moses LakeCommunity Development staff will oversee any stakeholder groups that
are formed, volunteers, consultants, and other members of the City’s staff on the development
code update. Community Development staff will facilitate public meetings; coordinate events
and activities; and present draft materials to the Planning Commission and City Council for
review. They will revise documents as needed and provide all materials to Planning
Commissioners and City Council members in a timely manner.
Role of the Public
Through the community outreach efforts, the Development Code update will be a reflection of
the community’s core values and will be written to assist the community and City staff in
meeting common goals. The Development Code will be a reflection of the community’s core
values, ideas, and policy objectives already identified in the Comprehensive Plan, and
identified during the Code update process.
During the update process it is important to retain the public’s interest by making community
participation as accessible as possible. The process will be driven by the community and
guided by City staff and any stakeholder groups that are formed. Community participation will
be accomplished by employing a variety of community outreach tools; and using a diverse
communication tools to provide information and to engage with the community
METHODS AND TOOLS
Techniques for public participation vary in scale, technology, structure, and timing. Our
community members are busy and active people, in order to get broad representation, we will
bring activities to the places where they are already going. Bringing information and asking for
input in neutral locations will also help to ensure that community members feel comfortable
expressing their ideas. The City also recognizes that to involve all community members a
variety of outreach methods and communication tools must be used throughout the update
process.
The following is a list of community outreach methods and communication tools that will be
used to foster broad and ongoing community involvement, collect community input, and
provide information to the community. These are not meant to be exhaustive lists; as the
process unfolds and the community engages in the process and shares ideas these lists will
be expanded upon.
Community Outreach Methods – (To be expanded upon with PC recommendations)
Public Open Houses and Meetings
Community Events and Activities
Focus Events
Interviews
Public Hearings
Public Comments
Communication Tools - (To be expanded upon with PC recommendations)
Written Materials
Interested Parties List
Online Community Engagement Platform
Development Code Update Webpage
Social Media
Newspaper Noticing and Advertisements
SCHEDULE – (To be Developed)
CONCLUSION
The City Council will adopt the Public Participation Plan at a regularly scheduled Council
meeting. This Plan may be updated administratively as conditions change and community
input is incorporated into the overall update strategy. A current copy of the Public Participation
Plan shall be available for viewing at the front counter of the Community Development
Department and on the City’s website
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
1011 Plum Street SE PO Box 42525 Olympia, Washington 98504-2525 (360) 725-4000
www.commerce.wa.gov
December 14, 2021
The Honorable David Curnel
Mayor of Moses Lake
401 S Balsam
Post Office Box 1579
Moses Lake, Washington 98837
Sent Via Electronic Mail
RE: Completion of the periodic update of Moses Lake’s Comprehensive Plan
Dear Mayor Curnel:
Thank you for sending Growth Management Services Ordinance No. 2992. We received this on
November 30, 2021 and processed it with the Material ID 2021-S-3438. This ordinance
indicates the completion of your comprehensive plan review and update required under RCW
36.70A.130. We recognize the substantial investment of time, energy, and resources that these
documents represent. We congratulate you, your planning commission, staff, and involved
citizens for the good work represented by your update.
Next Steps to Complete the Periodic Update:
RCW 36.70A.130(1) requires that counties and cities take action to review and revise, if
necessary, their comprehensive plans and development regulations, including their critical areas
ordinances, every eight-years. At this time, it appears you still need to finalize the review and
update of your development regulations and critical area regulations.
Finalizing the Periodic Update Process:
Commerce recommends that your final legislative action documents the entire review process
and declares that the periodic update required in RCW 36.70A.130(1) is complete. This final
action should outline opportunities for the public to take part in this review, and include findings
that your comprehensive plan and development regulations are consistent with the Growth
Management Act.
If you have any questions or concerns about any planning or growth management issues, please
call William Simpson, Senior Planner, at (509) 280-3602. We extend our continued support to
the City of Moses Lake in achieving the goals of growth management.
Sincerely,
Dave Andersen, AICP
Managing Director
Growth Management Services
DA:WS:lw
cc: Allison Williams, City Manager, City of Moses Lake
Melissa Bethel, Community Development Director, City of Moses Lake
William Simpson, AICP, Senior Planner, Growth Management Services
Benjamin Serr, AICP, Eastern Regional Manager, Growth Management Services
George Mazur, Senior Transportation Planner, WA Department of Transportation
Eric Pentico, Habitat Biologist, WA Department of Fish and Wildlife
Moses Lake Title 15:
Unified Development Code
CONTENTS:
• Division I: General Provisions
• Division II: Development Review and Enforcement
• Division III: Zoning Districts and Land Use
• Division IV: Community and Project Design
• Division V: Environmental, Critical Areas, and Growth Management Act
• Division VI: Definitions, Word Usage, and Measurement.
Division I: General Provisions
15.01 General Provisions
Section Action Notes
15.01.01 Title Draft complete with initial CDD input Draft complete
15.01.02 Purposes Draft complete with initial CDD input Draft complete
15.01.03 User Guide Draft complete with initial CDD input Finalize near end of code
drafting – CDD staff led
15.01.04 Applicability Draft complete with initial CDD input Draft complete
15.01.05 Interpretation and Draft complete with initial CDD input Draft complete
Severability
FINAL COMBINED Division I Draft complete minus user
guide
Division II: Development Review & Enforcement
15.02 Development Review
Section Action Notes
15.02.01 Purpose and Draft complete with CDD input Draft complete
Administration
15.02.02 Permit Review Process Draft complete with CDD input Draft complete
Types
15.02.03 Permit Review Draft complete with CDD input Draft complete
Procedures
15.02.04 Hearings and Appeals Draft complete with CDD input Draft complete
15.02.05 Review Criteria for Draft complete with CDD input Draft complete
Certain Permits
15.02.06 Supplementary Draft complete with CDD input Draft complete
Standards
15.02.07 Subdivisions Draft complete with CDD input Draft complete
FINAL COMBINED Division II Draft complete with CDD input Draft complete:
Next steps:
Page 1 of 4
Draft Date: July 7, 2023
CDD staff gather input from
various departments
Present draft code to PC/ CC
Division III: Zoning Districts and Land Use
15.03 Zones, Overlay Zones and Land Use
Section Action Notes
15.03.01 Purpose and Application Draft complete with initial CDD input
15.03.02 Adopted Zoning Map Draft complete with initial CDD input
and Interpretation
15.03.03 Establishment of Zones Draft complete with initial CDD input Need to finalize what to do
and Overlay Zones with Public Zones
15.03.04 Land Use by Zone Draft complete with initial CDD input
15.04 Residential District Standards
15.04.01 Purpose and Application Draft complete with initial CDD input
15.04.02 Low Density Residential Draft complete with initial CDD input
(R-1) Standards
15.04.03 Medium Density Draft complete with initial CDD input
Residential (R-2) Standards
15.04.04 High Density Residential Draft complete with initial CDD input
(R-3) Standards
15.05 Supplemental Residential District Standards
15.05.01 Building Height Plane Draft complete with initial CDD input
15.05.02 Zero Lot Line Standards Draft complete with initial CDD input CCD Staff to coordinate with
Building/ Engineering
15.05.03 Manufactured Homes on Need input on direction/ choices CDD CCD Staff to coordinate with
Individual Lots staff Building/ Engineering
15.05.04 Manufactured Home Need input on direction/ choices CDD CCD Staff to coordinate with
Communities staff Building/ Engineering
15.05.05 Cluster Development Draft complete with initial CDD input CCD Staff to coordinate with
Building/ Engineering
15.05.06 Accessory Dwelling Units Draft complete with initial CDD input Revised with HB additions
15.05.07 Emergency and Draft complete with initial CDD input Revised with State law
Transitional Housing compliance
15.05.08 Other Housing Types Staff discussion needed CCD Staff to coordinate with
Building/ Engineering
15.06 Nonresidential and Mixed Use Standards
15.06.01 Purpose and Application Draft complete with initial CDD input
15.06.02 Nonresidential and Draft complete with initial CDD input
Mixed Use StandardsError!
Bookmark not defined.
15.06.03 Mixed Use and Live- Draft complete with initial CDD input
Work
15.06.04 Commercial/ Industrial Staff coordinate discussion with CCD to coordinate with
Standards Engineering/ Planning Engineering (Perteet) industrial
standards
15.06.05 Essential Public Facilities Draft complete – need CCD review
Page 2 of 4
Draft Date: July 7, 2023
15.06.06 Airport Overlay
Standards
FINAL COMBINED Division III
Division IV: Community and Project Design
15.07 Community Design Standards
Section Action Notes
15.07.01 Purpose and Application
15.07.02 Streetscape
DesignError! Bookmark not
defined.
15.07.03 Subdivision and Block
Structure
15.07.04 Open Space
15.07.05 Downtown Design Some outreach has been done
Standards with downtown organizations
15.07.06 Commercial Transition
Design Standards
15.08 Project Design Standards
15.08.01 Purpose and Application
15.08.02 Site Orientation
15.08.03 Site Planning and Design Pedestrian pathways, parking
Elements lot orientation, internal
pathways, internal vehicular
circulations
15.08.04 Building Design
15.08.05 Off-Street Parking Draft started by consultant References other chapters
15.08.06 Landscaping Draft started by consultant References other chapters
15.08.07 Outdoor Lighting
15.08.08 Wireless Communication Draft started by consultant/ CCD staff References other chapters
Facilities
15.09 Signs
15.09.01 Purpose and Application
15.09.02 Types
15.09.03 Design Characteristics
15.09.04 Nonconforming Signs
15.09.05 Enforcement
FINAL COMBINED Division IV Draft of entire division once we
get a near final of the zoning
chapter (Division III)
Division V: Environmental, Critical Areas, and SEPA
15.09 SEPA
Page 3 of 4
Draft Date: July 7, 2023
Section Action Notes
15.10 TBD Sections reference RCW/ WACs
(SEPA) flow chart
15.10 Critical Areas Preservation
15.11.01 Purpose and Application
15.11.02 Applicability
15.11.03 Procedures
15.11.04 Critical Aquifer Recharge Area
15.10.05 Fish and Wildlife Habitat and
Conversation Areas
15.11.06 Frequently Flooded Areas
15.11.07 Geologically Hazardous Areas
15.11.08 Wetlands
15.11.09 Nonconforming Uses/ Structures
15.11.10 Appeals
15.11.11 Shoreline Management
FINAL COMBINED Division V Maintain BAS; organize content
from existing code into more
understandable language
Division VI: Definitions, Word Usage, and Measurements
15.12 Definitions, Word Usage, and Measurements
Section Action Notes
15.12.01 Purpose and Application
15.12.02 Definitions
15.12.03 Word Usage
15.12.02 Measurements
FINAL COMBINED DIVISION VI Draft in progress – integrating
new definitions as we go
through each title
Page 4 of 4
Draft Date: July 7, 2023
NOTICE OF DECISION TAKEN ON
SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PLN2022-0076
Applicant: Chad & Melanie Strevy - 509 Astro Loop, Moses Lake, WA
Project Description: Chad & Melanie Strevy applied for a Shoreline Substantial Development permit
to install a retaining wall that measures approximately 80 lineal feet, 6” wide, and about 4’-6’ tall.
Legal Description/Location: The subject property is located at 509 Astro Loop and described as Lot
14, Block 3 of the Westlake Shores Phase III Subdivision.
Shoreline Master Program: The City of Moses Lake Shoreline Master Program classifies this
environment of the Moses Lake shoreline as Residential Resource. The purpose of this designation is
to retain ecological functions and have the potential for development that is compatible with
ecological protection and restoration. The regulations currently support or are planned for shoreline
residential uses.
Washington Administrative Code (WAC) The Shoreline Management Act is implemented through
WAC 173-26 and 173-27 which regulates development within 200 feet of the shoreline’s Ordinary
High-Water Mark (OHWM). Washington’s Shoreline Management Act (Act) was passed by the State
Legislature in 1971 and adopted by voters in 1972. The overarching goal of the Act is "to prevent the
inherent harm in an uncoordinated and piecemeal development of the state’s shorelines."
WAC 173-27-150 establishes minimum review criteria for Shoreline Substantial Development Permits
(SSDP). These criteria state that an SSDP shall be granted only when the proposed development is
consistent with:
• The policies and procedures of the Act.
• The applicable master program adopted or approved for the area.
Environmental Review – State Environmental Policy Act: The City of Moses Lake issued a
Determination of Non-Significance on June 8, 2023, per WAC 197-11-355.
PLN2022-0076 Strevy Retaining Wall is hereby APPROVED based on the findings of fact and the
following conditions:
FINDINGS of FACT
1. The applicants are Chad & Melanie Strevy 509 Astor Loop NE., Moses Lake, WA 98837
2. General Description: The sand will be removed from the area where the project will take place
which is 25’ from the shoreline. Sand will be dug out with a mini excavator. Upon completion of
Strevy Retaining Wall - Notice of Action
Page 1 of 4
the dig, the footings will be formed. A concrete pump to pump the concrete from Astor Loop NE
to the footing will be used. Wall forms will be placed, and concrete poured. All construction
debris will be removed. The retaining wall will be built according to plans that were engineered
for this area.
3. The subject property is located at 509 Astor Loop and described as Lot 14, Block 3 of the West
Lake Shores PH III Major Subdivision. The property is further described as being located within
Section 32, Township 19N, Range 28E, Moses Lake, Grant County, Washington.
4. The Comprehensive Plan Designation is Residential zoning district.
5. The subject property is R-1 low density.
6. The property is designated as “Shoreline Residential Resource” by the City of Moses Lake
Shoreline Master Program.
7. WAC 173-27-150 establishes minimum review criteria for Shoreline Management Substantial
Development Permits. This criteria states that a substantial development permit shall be
granted only when the development proposed is consistent with the policies and procedures of
the Act; the provisions of this regulation; and the applicable master program adopted or
approved for the area.
8. The applicant submitted a Geologically Hazardous Areas Report dated October 21, 2022,
prepared by Julio Gonzalez with Western Pacific Engineering. “This study shows that the area of
interest for construction has a four-foot (4’) drop within the property with an approximate slope
of two to one. Pursuant to MLMC 19.03.160 Geologically Hazardous Areas, the property could
have a potential geologic hazard. This hazard could be due to the property being near a body of
water or an area with high risk of erosion.”.
9. The region includes soil that is conducive to erosion and destabilization.
10. The erosion is not being caused by upland conditions, such as drainage and the loss of
vegetation.
11. Non-structural measures (such as placing the use farther from the shoreline), vegetative
methods, or installing on-site drainage improvements, are not feasible or not sufficient.
12. The stabilization will not cause significant ecological impacts to any species or habitat.
13. MLMC Title 20, Development Review Process, regulates the permit review process. Relevant
findings and conclusions from Section 20.09.020 that must be made are as follows:
A. The development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the requirements
and intent of the Municipal Code.
Page 2 of 4
B. The development adequately mitigates impacts identified under Chapters 14 through 19.
C. The development is beneficial to the public health, safety, and welfare, and is in the
public interest.
D. The area, location and features of land proposed is are a direct result of the development
proposal, are reasonably needed to mitigate the effects of the development and are
proportional to the impacts created by the development.
14. Comments from reviewing agencies have been considered and incorporated.
15. The City of Moses Lake circulated an Optional Determination of Non-significance (DNS) on
December 23, 2022, with comments due on January 6, 2023 in accordance with WAC 197-11-
355 (Optional DNS). The DNS was issued on June 8, 2023.
16. Surrounding property owners were given the opportunity to comment on the proposals, can
request a copy of the decision, and can appeal the decision subject to the requirements
outlined in MLMC Title 18. No comments were received.
17. Proper legal requirements were met, and surrounding property owners were given the
opportunity to comment on the proposal at a public hearing.
18. WAC 173-27-090 requires that construction must be commenced within 2 years of the effective
date of the shoreline permit and that authorization for construction shall terminate 5 years after
the effective date of the shoreline permit.
19. As conditioned, the development will not adversely affect the general public, health, safety, and
general welfare.
CONCLUSTIONS:
1. As conditioned, the development meets the goals, policies and implementation
recommendations as set forth in the Moses Lake Comprehensive Plan and the Moses Lake
Shoreline Master Program.
2. As conditioned, this proposal is consistent with applicable federal and state laws and
regulations. As proposed, revised, and conditioned, potential impacts of the project can be
mitigated.
3. Public interests will be served by approval of this proposal.
4. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with Title 14 “Environment Regulations” and Title
18 “Zoning” of the MLMC, and the Shoreline Master Program.
5. The development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the
requirements and intent of the Municipal Code.
Page 3 of 4
6. The development adequately mitigates impacts identified under Chapters 14 through 19.
7. The development is beneficial to the public health, safety, and welfare, and is in the public
interest.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The project shall proceed in substantial conformance with the plans and application materials
of file submitted on October 28, 2022, except as amended by the conditions herein.
2. The applicant shall comply with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations.
3. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations within the Geologically Hazardous
Areas Report dated October 21, 2022, prepared by Julio Gonzalez with Western Pacific
Engineering and the referenced wall engineering.
4. A copy of this permit and attached conditions shall always be kept on-site and provided to
the contractor and all others working within the shoreline area. The applicant, contractor,
machinery operators and all others working within the shoreline area shall have read this
permit and attached conditions and shall always follow its conditions.
5. Erosion control fencing shall be installed prior to removal of the fill and remain in place and
be maintained until the installed vegetation has taken hold to protect the buffer from erosion
and siltation.
6. The project application shall proceed consistent with proposed project details dated on
October 28, 2022.
Date: July 7, 2023
Nathan Nofziger, Planning Commission Chair
Appeals to the Shoreline Hearings Board of a decision on a shoreline substantial development
permit, shoreline variance, shoreline conditional use permit, or a decision on an appeal of an
administrative action, may be filed by the applicant or any aggrieved party pursuant to RCW
90.58.180 within twenty-one (21) days of filing the final decision by the city or county with the
Department of Ecology.
Page 4 of 4
Get email alerts for Moses Lake
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.