Board of Zoning Appeals

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS VIDEO CONFERENCE MEETING NOTICE May 18, 2020 6:00 PM NOTE: Items in blue are hyperlinks to submittals and additional information. Some documents are large and may take a few moments to load. Green arrows > in Minutes are hyperlinks to the recording. Please visit the Planning Department home page at www.tompsc.com for instructions on participating in the meeting. A. Roll Call B. Approval of Agenda C. Approval of Minutes (February 2020 meeting) D. Public Comment E. General Correspondence F. Explanation of Procedures G. Administration of Oath H. Business Staff Report 1. Case V-12-2020, 30 Isle of Hope, TMS# 553-06-00-276, Request for relief from the strict application of I’On Code Planned Development ordinance to allow a 46.6% lot coverage for an ‘All Yard Building” lot for the construction of a garage. The I’On Planned Development Ordinance limits “All Yard” lots to 40% maximum lot coverage. 2. Case S-1-2020, 520 King Street, TMS# 532-01-00-227, Request for a Special Exception to allow a monopole telecommunications tower in accordance with §156.325, §156.411, and §156.118 et al on property zoned PI-2 Public Institutional-2 District. 3. REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE Case V-13-2020, 115 Elizabeth Street, TMS# 532-01-00-149, Request for relief from the strict application of §156.201 and additional relief from that previously granted by the Board of Zoning Appeals Case V-40-16 to allow the elimination of the rear and side yard buffer and maintenance of the existing 5-foot wooden picket fence. The ordinance requires a twenty-five (25) foot E buffer with an 8-foot masonry column and  wood infill fence. The Board of Zoning Appeals Case V-40-16 granted a reduction of the 25-foot buffer to five feet with an 8-foot masonry column and wood infill fence. CORRESPONDENCE 4. REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE Case A-1-2020, Pepper Plantation PD, Hwy. 17N, TMS# 615-00-00-044, Appeal of the Zoning Administrator’s determination that a proposed auto service and repair component of an automobile dealership is a minor part of the proposed business and therefore should be allowed to operate as part of the retail establishment. The applicant contends that the proposed use is not a “minor part” of the dealership business since it accounts for almost half of the business generated. The applicant also contends that use does not meet the requirements of the Pepper Plantation Planned Development Ordinance, specifically stating “No outdoor storage of equipment or cars without adequate screening with 12,000 square foot maximum.” CORRESPONDENCE 5. Case V-14-2020, 1135 Snapdragon Court, TMS# 562-08-00-122, Request for relief from the strict application of §156.304 C.3 [Table] to allow a two-foot rear yard encroachment. The ordinance requires a 20-foot rear yard setback in R-4 Medium-density Residential District. I. Adjournment RESOURCE LINKS Explanation of BOZA Process Case Law Notes Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Online Document Library Projects and Applications Map Use Table Zoning Code (PDF) Zoning Map (interactive) Title VI Notice: The Town of Mount Pleasant fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. Town meetings are conducted in accessible locations, materials can be provided in accessible formats, and provided in languages other than English. If you would like accessibility or language accommodation, please contact the Title VI Coordinator one week in advance of the meeting, at the Town of Mount Pleasant at 843-884-8517. NOTE: Correspondence must be received no later than 4:30 PM, May 13th for presentation to the Board and inclusion in the record.