Historic District Preservation Commission (HDPC)
Regular MeetingMount Pleasant, SC · August 13, 2018
Minutes
OLD VILLAGE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
MEETING NOTICE
August 13, 2018 at 5:00pm
Town Hall Committee Meeting Room
3rd Floor, Room 3300
100 Ann Edwards Lane, Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
******************
NOTE: Items in blue are hyperlinks (some file sizes are large and may take a minute to load).
MINUTES
PRESENT: Scott Hirshorn, Chair; Leigh Rowe, Louisa
Montgomery and Ann Dovre
EXCUSED ABSENCE: Heather Wilson, Vice Chair
STAFF PRESENT: Austin Rutherford, Senior Planner; Joe Juan; Plan
Reviewer
Mr. Hirshorn called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. and reviewed the
procedures with the public.
I. Approval of Agenda
Ms. Rowe moved to approve the August 13, 2018 agenda; seconded by
Ms. Montgomery. All present voted in favor.
II. Approval of Minutes July 9, 2018
Ms. Montgomery stated that on page 11, Dr. Spicer indicated that the
house at 200 Queen Street was destroyed by Hurricane Hugo. She stated
that it was not destroyed.
Ms. Montgomery moved for approval; seconded by Ms. Dovre. All present
voted in favor.
Old Village Historic District Commission
August 13, 2018
Page 2 of 6
III. Public Comment & General Correspondence
Brett Bennett, 131 Hibben Street, stated that he would like to call the
Commission’s attention to what he and others in his neighborhood are
perceiving as an escalating parking problem. He stated that
correspondence was sent to Commission members earlier today. He said
he also serves on the Shem Creek Task Force and it has been a modest
topic of conversation, as everyone is attempting to determine how to
manage the activities and the capacity of Shem Creek. He stated that the
challenge is the increase of commercial activity along Shem Creek as well
as along Coleman Boulevard, and the need for parking. He said that the
streets and thoroughfares throughout the Old Village are not curbed nor
were they designed for accommodating a great deal of parking, in the
rights of way. He said the patrons of the commercial businesses are
taking advantage of the parking along the streets. He said that it has
become a livability issue for many residents who live on Bennett Street,
Live Oak Drive, Haddrell Street and others. He said that he is calling the
Commission’s attention to this. He does not believe it is expressly the
purview of the Old Village Historic District Commission; however, given
the purpose of the Commission, his view is that the Commission may be
in a position to wield some influence and request the Town and/or the
South Carolina Department of Transportation to weigh in on what
potential solutions they may suggest. He stated that this is his request for
support from the Commission in identifying solutions in one form or
another. He added that he does not have recommended solutions;
however, some of the ideas that have been discussed are some type of
permit program and there may be others. He stated that there is an
escalating problem that does not appear to be going away given how
popular the Shem Creek and Coleman businesses are.
Mr. Hirshorn stated that it appears that issues have escalated since the
construction of the large parking garage. He is not sure if patrons are not
utilizing the garage or if there are simply excess demands. He stated that
he is not sure what the Commission is able to do; however, this is an issue
that is escalating and should be dealt with by the Town as Shem Creek
becomes more populated.
Old Village Historic District Commission
August 13, 2018
Page 3 of 6
Mr. Rutherford stated that when reviewing the pictures, only two of the
eight photographs are within the confines of the Historic District.
Mr. Bennett stated that it is three or possibly four of the eight
photographs that are within the Historic District. He said the reason for
all the pictures is because the parking adjacent to the District influences
parking inside the district.
Mr. Hirshorn stated that the Commission is happy to assist with the
parking issues.
Mr. Rutherford stated that he would work with staff in terms of reaching
out to the Transportation Department, because this deals with areas that
are partly in the OVHD and other areas that are not.
Ms. Rowe stated that she constantly receives calls from residents in the
OVHD who believe that this Commission does have purview. She stated
that there are three Commission members who reside on Hibben Street,
so they are well acquainted with this issue.
Ms. Montgomery stated that she has noticed that people are parking on
Hibben Street and walking down Church Street to the restaurants. She
said as traffic increases, it then becomes a safety issue.
Mr. Rutherford stated that he is aware that some of this is stemmed by
the I’On Company’s project at the corner of Hibben and Whilden Streets,
and the parking on Patjens Lane. He said although the properties on
Patjens Lane are in the Old Village, Patjens Lane itself is not. He said the
same also goes for most of Whilden and Royall, with the exception of the
area in front of the church.
Mr. Hirshorn thanked Mr. Bennett and said the Commission is here to
help understand the issue and would welcome any suggestions on how
to curb it.
IV. Consent Motions
[No consent motions]
Old Village Historic District Commission
August 13, 2018
Page 4 of 6
V. Business
STAFF REPORT
1. 966 Pitt Street – Survey 5976 – (TMS 532-13-00-036)
Applicant is seeking Final Review on porch roof and window
placement alterations from a previously approved new construction.
Mr. Rutherford reviewed staff comments with the Commission.
Ms. Rowe stated that the alterations look much better.
Ms. Rowe moved to approve the application for 966 Pitt Street on final
review for porch roof and window placement by consent; seconded by
Ms. Montgomery. All present voted in favor.
2. 210 Bennett Street – Historic 6149 – (TMS 532-01-00-065) Applicant is
seeking Conceptual Comment for a home addition, demolishing an
existing garage and replacing it with a new ADU/garage, and a pool.
Mr. Rutherford reviewed staff comments with the Commission.
Kate Campbell, Beau Clowney Architects, representing the
homeowners, Jeff & Susan Davall, who are moving to Mount Pleasant
full time and are from Maryland. She stated that the house was
originally built in 1830. She stated that all the additions that are being
proposed are one story in nature. She said there was an addition to
the rear of the house that was done in 2007 and it can be seen where
it notches below the vanity and the whole area was added on to the
back of the house, two stories. She stated that they are extending the
first floor living space to the rear to create a larger kitchen, living space
and a master suite, along with an additional porch. She said the 16%
of what they are adding on the rear is porch to make it more livable to
the rear yard with the pool. She said alterations were made in 2014
and some of those will be removed based on the deck in the back. She
stated that the homeowners have spoken to the most adjacent
neighbors who are all in support.
Mr. Hirshorn asked if the garage that is being demolished is of historic
nature.
Old Village Historic District Commission
August 13, 2018
Page 5 of 6
Mr. Rutherford stated that he did not find the garage on any of the
historic registers for the surveys.
Mr. Hirshorn stated that in the event an application is presented to
demolish the garage, he asked that supporting documentation be
presented so the Commission is certain that a historic structure is not
being demolished. He said that all materials, windows, window
designs and additions, will be scrutinized much more closely as this is
a historic structure. He said when the application is submitted for final
approval, please ensure all these items have been completed.
Ms. Montgomery stated that her main concern was whether the
garage was historic or not. She said as long as the body of the historic
home is protected, she believes it will be a vast improvement.
Ms. Rowe stated that the historic structure was lovely, but impossible
to live in for a family. She commended Ms. Campbell for her design.
She stated that the ADU appears very tall; however, since it is back,
she believes it will be fine. She said the garage was not a historic
structure. She stated that she agrees with Mr. Hirshorn’s comments
regarding the materials.
Mr. Rutherford stated that the garage was not even seen in the
survey.
Ms. Campbell stated that based on satellite images, the garage
appears between 1989 and 1994 on the google timeline.
Mr. Hirshorn asked Ms. Campbell to bring all this documentation.
Mr. Hirshorn asked if Mr. Lisi would be the contractor on this project.
Ms. Campbell responded in the affirmative.
Mr. Hirshorn stated that he does not have any documentation on
materials and windows. He stated that this is an important historic
structure on an important historic street. He said that Mr. Lisi is very
knowledgeable and does great work.
Ms. Campbell stated that the only area they are touching is the back
right corner where a guest suite will be added and on the front for part
Old Village Historic District Commission
August 13, 2018
Page 6 of 6
of the master suite addition. She said those will be the only sections
touching the historic material.
Mr. Hirshorn stated that the Commission is very particular on the
ADU’s (Accessory Dwelling Units) and asked for the structure to be as
compliant as possible in order to save time and effort.
Ms. Dovre asked if the additional roof will use the same materials.
Ms. Campbell said that the roof on the porch will be metal, based on
the slope. She said spot elevations are being made currently in order
to have a better sense of what the heights are, which will dictate the
overall height of the garage. She stated that the property does slope
from front to back. She stated that they are open to putting in an
apron at the front drive in order to keep the gravel from traveling.
VI. Staff Approvals
1. 510 Pitt Street – Survey 4231 - (TMS 532-05-00-045) Window
replacements to match originals.
VII. Motion to Adjourn
Ms. Montgomery moved to adjourn; seconded by Ms. Dovre. All present
voted in favor.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:24 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Barbara Ashe
August 13, 2018
Agenda
RESOURCE LINKS
OVHDC Guidelines
OVHD Overlay District Zoning Ordinance
Map of Historic District and Properties
2010 Survey Cards (no photos)
OLD VILLAGE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
MEETING NOTICE
August 13, 2018 at 5:00pm
Town Hall Committee Meeting Room
3rd Floor, Room 3300
100 Ann Edwards Lane, Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
******************
NOTE: Items in blue are hyperlinks (some file sizes are large and may take a minute to load).
I. Approval of Agenda
II. Approval of Minutes
July 9, 2018
III. Public Comment & General Correspondence
IV. Consent Motions
V. Business
STAFF REPORT
1. 966 Pitt Street – Survey 5976 – (TMS 532-13-00-036) Applicant is
seeking Final Review on porch roof and window placement alterations
from a previously approved new construction.
2. 210 Bennett Street – Historic 6149 – (TMS 532-01-00-065) Applicant is
seeking Conceptual Comment for a home addition, demolishing an
existing garage and replacing it with a new ADU/garage, and a pool.
VI. Staff Approvals
1. 510 Pitt Street – Survey 4231 - (TMS 532-05-00-045) Window
replacements to match originals.
VII.Motion to Adjourn
Title VI Notice: The Town of Mount Pleasant fully complies with Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and related statutes
and regulations in all programs and activities. Town meetings are conducted in
accessible locations, materials can be provided in accessible formats, and provided
in languages other than English. If you would like accessibility or language
accommodation, please contact the Title VI Coordinator one week in advance of the
meeting, at the Town of Mount Pleasant at 843-884-8517.
Get email alerts for Mount Pleasant
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.