Transportation Committee
Regular MeetingMount Pleasant, SC · February 5, 2018
Minutes
TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
Monday, February 5, 2018 at 1:45 p.m.
Municipal Complex, Committee Meeting Room, 3rd Floor
100 Ann Edwards Lane
Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
MINUTES
Members Present: Mayor Will Haynie, Chair; Joe Bustos; Bob Brimmer
Staff Present: Eric DeMoura, Paul Lykins, James Aton
Mayor Haynie called the meeting to order at 1:58 p.m.
1. Approval of Minutes from the January 2, 2018 meeting
Mr. Bustos moved for approval of the January 2, 2018, minutes; motion
seconded by Mr. Brimmer. Motion carried unanimously.
2. Public Comments
None
3. Consideration of the Title VI compliance plan
Mr. DeMoura introduced Jim Hinchey, Town of Mount Pleasant Legal
Counsel, to lead the discussion.
Mr. Hinchey stated that the Title VI compliance plan that was occasioned by
a review of the by the Department of Transportation. The plan has been
presented to Council and will have a final reading during February 13, 2018,
Council meeting.
Mayor Haynie asked if any action would be required by Committee.
Mr. DeMoura replied that Committee would need to accept the Title VI
compliance plan.
Mayor Haynie asked for discussion regarding accepting the compliance plan.
Transportation Committee Minutes
February 5, 2018
Page 2 of 14
Mr. Brimmer moved to approve the Title VI plan as presented by staff; motion
seconded by Mr. Bustos. Motion carried unanimously.
4. Annual selection of Charleston County Transportation Sales Tax (TST) and
Charleston County Transportation Committee (CTC) projects
Mr. Aton stated that a memo was submitted to Committee outlining a list of
intersection, drainage and pedestrian/bicycle projects that staff has ranked
and is seeking approval from Committee to proceed with submittal to County
for Charleston County Transportation Sales Tax (TST) and Charleston County
Transportation Committee (CTC) for funding.
Mr. DeMoura stated that if Committee desired, staff could provide a synopsis
of the projects and how each project is ranked.
Mr. Aton stated that there are two (2) intersection improvements that were
developed in the Transportation Department.
Mayor Haynie asked Mr. Aton if an overhead graphic was available for
reference.
Mr. Aton replied in the negative stating a memo had been submitted to
Committee prior to the Transportation Committee meeting.
Mr. Aton stated that the list provided to Committee has projects listed in
order by their ranking, prioritizing the Mathis Ferry Road at Lauda Drive turn
lane and signal installation improvements. The project would be in
coordination with the opening of the new Lucy Beckham High School and the
improvements are necessary to facilitate better traffic flows through the
intersection. Belle Hall Parkway and Paul Foster Road intersection
improvements are a result from resident requests for an all-way stop. The
intersection does not meet the warrants for an all way stop but the Town does
own existing right of way at the intersection there is potential to design and
install a mini roundabout.
Mr. Brimmer stated that it was his understanding that when Indigo Square
was approved, the developer would be responsible to contributing to the
intersection improvements.
Mr. Lykins answered in the affirmative.
Transportation Committee Minutes
February 5, 2018
Page 3 of 14
Mr. Brimmer inquired if the cost reflected in the memo is the Town’s
obligation or the total cost of the project.
Mr. Lykins replied that the developer was to contribute to the construction
cost of the turn lane onto US-17 and was unsure if the developer was
supposed to contribute to the Lauda Drive intersection and an additional turn
lane on Mathis Ferry Road.
Mr. Aton stated that the proposed drainage improvements will include the
Shem Creek Park parking lot to improve water quality prior to discharging into
Shem Creek.
Mayor Haynie asked for clarification that area being referred to is the parking
area located at the restroom facilities and entrance to the boardwalk.
Mr. Aton replied in the affirmative stating the area is on the Shrimp Boat Lane
side of Shem Creek and currently there are some issues with the gravel having
to be re-graded on a consistent basis and lessening the quality of run-off into
Shem Creek. Improvements would provide a more pervious and stable
structure, improving water quality and the overall quality of the parking area.
Mayor Haynie asked if the improvement would involve paving with a pervious
surface.
Mr. Aton replied that Hillary Repik, Town of Mount Pleasant Stormwater
Division Chief, will address aspects of the drainage projects.
Ms. Repik stated that currently the parking area is using a sand shell material
and although the project is not in full design, staff could send the project to
Charleston County to incorporate a paver style system that provides more
stability and the porosity than the sand shell offers. There are deep potholes
within the parking area and during large rain events, the materials are
washing away.
Mayor Haynie inquired if a timeline for the project had been established.
Mr. Repik replied a timeline is completely dependent on the CTC/TST
committee selecting a Town project explaining that if the project is not
selected, staff will consider the issue as internal maintenance project with
Town.
Transportation Committee Minutes
February 5, 2018
Page 4 of 14
Mayor Haynie commented that the area is visited by many tourists and
resolving the issue sooner in the off season is better.
Ms. Repik agreed, stating a contractor is on a schedule to grade and blade the
area, but the area does need more attention and staff is working with Town
maintenance crews for better upkeep and the sand shell that is currently in
use needs to be replaced with a material that is more permanent and stable.
Mayor Haynie asked if the parking area would remain a pervious surface.
Ms. Repik replied in the affirmative stating that the areas would include the
parking at Shem Creek Park and a strip on Shrimp Boat Lane near Vickery’s
Bar and Grill that is also a public parking area.
Mr. Aton continued stating that the second drainage improvement would
encompass roadside ditch restoration in the Darrell Creek and
Commonwealth neighborhoods.
Ms. Repik stated that large drainage canal issues along Town owned roads are
being addressed though the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the Capital
Maintenance Plan (CMP). There are several Town roadways within the
neighborhoods that have roadside ditch systems using different sized pipes
that were not installed to Town standards before the properties were
annexed, and we would like to have the ditches surveyed to install the correct
size pipes and have the system graded out. If the County does not select this
project, we will continue to try and incorporate the project into our long-term
program.
Mayor Haynie inquired if the linear footage was known.
Ms. Repik replied in the affirmative stating that some linear footage was
provided in the original submittal with an approximate total of two (2) miles.
If funding is not available, project areas can be addressed one section at a
time.
Mr. Brimmer asked if both neighborhoods are entirely within the Town.
Ms. Repik replied that there are several parcels that remain within the County
and that it is anticipated that those parcels will be annexed.
Transportation Committee Minutes
February 5, 2018
Page 5 of 14
Mayor Haynie asked that, with the drainage needs we know of within the
Town, how do we select this project at a cost of one million dollars
($1,000,000) when there are other areas of Town that could use one million
dollars ($1,000,000) in drainage improvements.
Ms. Repik replied that with the street ditch program, the focus is first on Town
roadways with roadside ditches to ensure that
Town-owned infrastructure is maintained. Candlewood and Pine Hollow are
two of the neighborhoods within the Town that have roadside ditches and
projects have been completed in those neighborhoods, the remainder of
roadways with roadside ditches are South Carolina Department of
Transportation (SCDOT or DOT) roadways. The goal is to prioritize Town-
owned roads and then work backwards.
Mayor Haynie asked for clarification that the reason the project has been
selected is because it is Town-owned.
Mr. Bustos commented that Rifle Range Road has a lot of open ditches and
floods and asked if the roads were Town roads.
Ms. Repik replied that the Rifle Range Road is a DOT road system along with
all primary roadways. Work orders are submitted to the DOT when there
flooding issues and staff is working toward a goal having the DOT establish a
regular maintenance program.
Ms. Bustos commented that the roadway is narrow road and there is not
much of a shoulder before the ditch.
Ms. Repik stated portions of the roadway have been piped with sidewalk
projects and there will be future sidewalk projects, but the current goal is to
establish a maintenance schedule with the DOT to try and improve the ditch
and its functionality. Piping the ditch system is a much larger capital
investment.
Mr. Bustos stated that at some point the ditches will need to be piped due to
the increase of automobiles on Rifle Range Road and the shoulder becomes
narrower.
Transportation Committee Minutes
February 5, 2018
Page 6 of 14
Mr. Aton continued stating that pedestrian and bicycle improvements are
broken out into two (2) sections; higher speed/higher volume routes and
lower speed/lower volume routes. The projects are ranked based off the
Town’s sidewalk evaluation matrix that has been recently developed in
coordination with the previous county weighting system and the system is
also used for CMP sidewalk projects. Projects include sidewalks on Rifle
Range Road from Hamlin Road to Porcher’s Bluff Road sidewalk and Porcher’s
Bluff Road from the roundabout to South Morgan’s Point Road
Mayor Haynie stated that there has been concerned about the risks bicycles
pose on Rifle Range Road and that is a state road and asked if a sidewalk is
installed on Rifle Range Road, will cyclists be allowed to ride bicycles on the
sidewalk.
Mr. DeMoura replied that law is not enforced.
Mr. Lykins commented that the State statute indicates sidewalks are for
pedestrian use, but since the law is not enforced bicyclists, can ride on the
sidewalk.
Mayor Haynie expressed that he has experienced some close calls on that
stretch of road at night that were scary as a vehicle operator and if a sidewalk
is installed, it is different than a bike lane in that we cannot enforce cyclists to
ride on the sidewalk.
Mr. Lykins stated that in addition to this project staff has also identified Rifle
Range Road pedestrian facility improvements in the CIP.
Mr. Bustos commented that the shoulder will need to be widened before that
can be accomplished.
Mr. Lykins agreed stating it would be a sizable project.
Mayor Haynie asked if these funds are from the County.
Mr. Lykins stated that the projects staff is submitting to Committee for
approval are lower level projects that the County requests from all the
municipalities each year. The projects being discussed are annual allocation
projects ranging around five hundred thousand dollars to approximately one
million dollars ($500,000-$1,000,000) and are not the bonded projects like
Transportation Committee Minutes
February 5, 2018
Page 7 of 14
the projects on SC-41 or I-526. The project list generally remains the same
and projects are rotated off the list as they are completed with new projects
being added.
Mr. Aton stated that the third project is located on Stuart Engals Boulevard
from Bowman Road to Ira Road.
Mayor Haynie inquired if the third project is also a sidewalk project.
Mr. Aton replied in the affirmative, stating each project listed is a sidewalk
project and that the last project listed on the high-volume route is located on
Rifle Range Road from Six Mile Road to Hamlin Road. The top ranked project
on the lower speed, lower volume routes is located on National Drive from
Linksland Road to Victory Point Drive and does have some existing sidewalk
that would be connected ultimately up to US-17 intersection.
Mr. Brimmer applauded the project ranking, stating that it has been an
ongoing dangerous situation.
Mr. Aton continued stating that other projects included locations on Whilden
Street from Hibben Street to Venning Street, noting that there is existing
sidewalk on one side of this roadway and this project would add a sidewalk
on the other side of the roadway. Cottingham Drive from Pelzer Drive to the
Johnnie Dodds Boulevard frontage road that would tie into the existing
County project that is being re-bid for sidewalk along Pelzer Drive from
Coleman Boulevard to the intersection of Cottingham Drive.
Mayor Haynie asked if the Cottingham Drive project would extend a sidewalk
from Pelzer Drive to Johnnie Dodds Boulevard.
Mr. Aton replied in the affirmative.
Mayor Haynie stated that the right of way already exists and asked for
clarification that no acquisition would be needed to take the sidewalk that
far.
Mr. Aton replied in the affirmative continuing that other projects include
sidewalks on Pherigo Street from Coleman Boulevard to McCants’s Drive, Live
Oak Drive from Bennett Street to Haddrell Street, Royall Avenue from
McCants Drive to Center Street, Wakendaw Road from Whipple Road to
Transportation Committee Minutes
February 5, 2018
Page 8 of 14
Trident Academy, Oakhaven Boulevard from Rifle Range Road to Oak Landing
Road and Deer Creek Road from the existing sidewalk to Commonwealth
Road.
Mr. Brimmer stated that there had been a previous discussion between
several Council members and the Grassy Creek Community approximately a
year ago where residents expressed the need for a sidewalk along Seacoast
Parkway and inquired if that need was evaluated.
Mr. DeMoura answered in the affirmative and stated the project has been
funded.
Mr. Lykins noted that the project has been funded and an update is included
in agenda item number five.
Mr. Bustos commented that there is no sidewalk on the portion of Coleman
between Whilden Street to Hibben Street, forcing pedestrians to either use
other streets and walking extra blocks or walk in Coleman Boulevard and
asked if the issue has ever been discussed.
Mr. Lykins replied in the affirmative explaining that the issue is that the
existing building is in the right of way as result the Coleman Boulevard
widening in 1958 and the DOT cut the building off and put it behind the back
of the curb. To install a sidewalk in that location would be a difficult task and
be major acquisition on that parcel. A bike lane will be installed on Coleman
Boulevard but there is not enough room for a sidewalk. When the property
is redeveloped a sidewalk will be obtainable.
Mr. Bustos stated that the building is small and asked how large the parcel is.
Mr. Lykins replied that he did not know how large the parcel is and that the
building is located the curb with two (2) large air-conditioning units.
Mr. Bustos asked if the Town is considering this option.
Mr. Lykins answered in the affirmative.
Mayor Haynie asked if staff needed recommendation from Committee to
proceed with the recommendations.
Mr. DeMoura answered in the affirmative.
Transportation Committee Minutes
February 5, 2018
Page 9 of 14
Mayor Haynie asked if Committee has options to revise the project list noting
that the deadline for submission is February 18, 2018.
Mr. DeMoura replied in the affirmative stating that staff will confirm the
deadline via email and the project list can be submitted on the last day of the
deadline and if Committee desires, the projects can be further discussed with
staff.
Mr. Bustos moved to make the recommendation to approve the selection for
County Transportation Sales Tax and County Transportation Committee
projects as presented by staff; motion seconded by Mr. Brimmer. Motion
carried unanimously.
5. Update – ongoing projects
a. Update on intersection improvements for US17/Faison Road and Park
Avenue Boulevard/Faison Road
Mayor Haynie stated that Agenda Item 5. a. was the only project update listed
and asked Mr. Lykins if he would like to provide Committee with other project
updates.
Mr. Lykins replied that updates on other CIP projects are available and
Committee could be briefed, but that there have not been many changes
from the previous month.
Mayor Haynie asked to begin with an update on Agenda Item 5. a. at the
request of Mr. Bustos and any remaining time can be used to highlight other
updates.
Mr. Aton stated that staff was directed by Committee to investigate the
intersections of US-17 at Faison Road and Park Boulevard at Faison Road and
a memo has been provided to Committee with details. A signal is currently
under construction for the intersection of US-17 at Faison Road and will be
operational this summer.
Mayor Haynie asked for clarification the signal will be installed on US-17.
Mr. Aton replied in the affirmative, stating that the intersection of Park
Avenue Boulevard and Faison Road does not meet warrants for a signal based
Transportation Committee Minutes
February 5, 2018
Page 10 of 14
off traffic counts from 2016. Staff would like to utilize an on-call consultant
to obtain a current traffic count and to project traffic volumes based on
known developments that are approved and currently under construction to
determine when and if a signal will be warranted for this intersection.
Mayor Haynie commented that it would be the aim to have some concurrency
with our infrastructure and planned development so that we know almost
certainty with how many units will be built in the planned development
agreement area to identify the threshold of when signal warrants will be met.
Mr. Aton explained there are currently nine (9) warrants listed in the Manual
of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) that Town, State and Federal
DOT’s adhere to and only a few of the nine (9) warrants apply to this specific
scenario. One warrant is an eight (8) hour vehicle count warrant and the
other warrant is a four (4) hour vehicle count warrant. There are certain
thresholds with volumes on the mainline and in this scenario, Park Avenue
Boulevard and the side street of Faison Road have been met in concurrence
during the same eight (8) or four (4) hour periods to warrant the installation
of a signal. With a more current count and projected volumes based off the
development and commercial or residential units going in, we should be able
to determine if a signal will meet warrants.
Mr. Brimmer commented that there has been more construction since 2016
and with more construction anticipated, now is the time to re-evaluate the
intersection. When discussions occur regarding transportation, especially in
the north end of Town, much of the conversation revolves around Park West
and Carolina Park, while Charleston National is rarely addressed. Through our
discussion today, it is nice that Charleston National will be acquiring some
sidewalks and intersection improvements.
Mr. Bustos noted that 2016 was before Oceanside Collegiate Academy was
built and that has added greatly to the traffic in addition to Costco and the
senior living home and it is important with future development the numbers
be recalculated.
Mayor Haynie stated that during a major road construction project traffic
patterns are altered and asked about increased traffic in the Old Village area
Transportation Committee Minutes
February 5, 2018
Page 11 of 14
from the Coleman Boulevard Revitalization project and what might be
considered in terms of traffic mitigation or traffic calming to protect those
neighborhoods.
Mr. Lykins replied that he is unaware of any traffic calming measures that can
be implemented on a temporary basis.
Mayor Haynie asked if temporary strips could be installed to slow traffic or if
there were other alternatives. In most places where road construction has
occurred, i.e., Park West Boulevard Widening project, the natural way will not
to be to cut through the residential street but in this case, it is.
Mr. Aton stated that any recommendations for traffic calming measures or
signage would have to be submitted through DOT for their encroachment
process and approval being that most of the roads in that area are State
owned road and anything that the Town moves forward with will have to go
through a full review.
Mr. DeMoura stated that typically in the past, the State will allow the locality
to install something or implement something they are comfortable with it.
One option that may be quicker than having to wait for an approval is direct
enforcement as a quick visual signal that the roads are being monitored
closely for drivers who may be using the roads within the Old Village area as
an alternative to Coleman Boulevard.
Mayor Haynie stated the issue is something to be considered for CIP projects
because there is concern that with Long Point Road Extension and
Realignment project, drivers may cut through Snee Farm to avoid road
construction. Alternatives to protect neighborhoods from cut through traffic
during road construction projects should be investigated and will be
appreciated by the residents.
Mr. DeMoura stated that the electronic warning signs have been effective in
that area.
Mr. Aton stated the natural cut through route to avoid Coleman Boulevard
would be to take Whilden Street and Royall Avenue, which currently has
speed humps in place, to McCants Drive, which has four (4) driver feedback
Transportation Committee Minutes
February 5, 2018
Page 12 of 14
signs installed and any additional measures will need to go through the DOT
approval process. Staff will be presenting the results of the effectiveness of
the signs to Committee at the six (6) month mark of the signs being installed.
Mayor Haynie asked what the signs are called that were installed on McCants
Drive.
Mr. Aton replied the signs are driver feedback signs.
Mayor Haynie inquired what the time frame would be for Committee to
receive a report based on the data collected from the driver feedback signs.
Mr. Aton replied stating that the signs collect real time data twenty-four (24)
hours a day, seven (7) days a week and can be downloaded to analyze the
eighty fifth percentile (85 %-tile) speed traffic volumes.
Mayor Haynie asked for clarification the data will provide speed and volumes.
Mr. Aton replied in the affirmative state it will give us volumes and speeds.
Mr. Bustos stated that there will be medians on Coleman Boulevard and those
medians were often said to provide a safe place to cross the street and I feel
that it is kind of an attractive nuisance because people will cross mid-block
because they do not want to walk from Fairmont down to Pherigo Street so
they are going to cross somewhere mid-block and now that will be happening
in front of Moultrie Middle School. I think we need to consider installing
street crossings there that are marked. I know that is going to further slow
the traffic at that location, but residents coming from the Boulevard are not
going to walk to the signal that is going to be installed at Pherigo Street.
Marked or raised crosswalks will provide pedestrians some measure of safety
as they cross the street.
Mr. Lykins stated that staff can discuss the issue with SCDOT as to what is
allowed at that location.
Mr. Bustos commented that there are crosswalks on Sullivan’s Island that
have a small sign within the crosswalk and all traffic must stop. Pedestrians
need to have a way where they are herded to an area rather than just, at will,
cross the street.
Transportation Committee Minutes
February 5, 2018
Page 13 of 14
Mr. Lykins stated that the issue was recently discussed at the Council Retreat
and that decorative fencing had been installed on the University of South
Carolina campus in Columbia and now students use the pedestrian signals
instead of crossing the street mid-block.
Mr. Bustos reiterated that he did not want to cut pedestrians off from being
able to cross the street mid-block because it be worse for the businesses, but
I do think they should have a safe way to cross the street.
Mr. Brimmer stated that the Seacoast Parkway Project is funded and asked if
a timeline has been established or if the project was in design explaining that
this item is a result of a community meeting where Council members were
invited to listing to resident concerns and is a good example of when a
community gets together and shares their concerns with elected officials, it is
a good way for the Town to know where the problems are and determine if
the issues can be addressed and this project is a result of that discussion. I
encourage other neighborhoods within the Town to contact Ms. Sims and
schedule meetings because they are very productive for Council as well as for
the neighborhoods.
Mr. Lykins stated that the list provided to Committee are the projects that the
County will be responsible for within the sales tax program. The largest is the
SC-41 widening project and smaller projects include the Park West Boulevard
left turn lane and the sidewalk on Anna Knapp Boulevard. The Seacoast
Parkway sidewalk project has been funded for 2018 and design is expected to
begin in 2019.
Mr. Brimmer inquired if the neighborhoods have been notified that the
project will happen.
Mr. DeMoura stated that the staff will reach out to the homeowner’s
association (HOA).
6. Adjourn
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 2:34 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Cathy Godsey
Transportation Committee Minutes
February 5, 2018
Page 14 of 14
February 8, 2018
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor William Haynie
Transportation Committee
From: Brad Morrison
Cc: Eric DeMoura
Date: February 1, 2018
Re: Charleston County Transportation Sales Tax (TST) and Charleston County Transportation
Committee (CTC) Annual Project Rankings
______________________________________________________________________________
The purpose of this memo is to address Agenda Item #4 of the February Transportation
Committee meeting.
Staff recently received application requests for Charleston County’s fiscal year 2019
Transportation Sales Tax (TST) Annual Allocation Projects. TST projects must fall within the
category of Local Paving (earth roads), Intersection Improvements, Drainage Improvements,
and Pedestrian/Bicycle Enhancements. These projecst are evaluated county-wide through an
Objective Evaluation and Prioritization Process to determine which projects are selected for
funding. Historically, the annual allocation from previous years has been $2M for Local Paving,
$2M for Intersection Improvements, $0.5M for Drainage Improvements, $1M for
Pedestrian/Bicycle Enhancements, and $1M for County Council/Public Works prjects.
Projects by category are listed below for consideration. The Intersection Improvements are
mainly composed of projects that were submitted for last year’s TST, but were not funded. The
Pedestrian and Bicycle projects are also projects that were submitted for last year’s TST, but
were not funded. The ranking for the Pedestrian and Bicycle projects has been modified using a
Sidewalk Evaluation Matrix recently developed by staff (see attachment for example of the
sidewalk evaluation matrix). Once the Committee and Town Council have confirmed the
prioritization of these projects, projects will be submitted for TST funding by Charleston County.
Once projects are selected for TST funding, the remaining highest ranking intersection and
pedestrian and bicycle improvement projects that fall within the funding range of $250-350K
will then be submitted by staff as the prioritized list for the CTC annual request.
100 ANN EDWARDS LANE, MOUNT PLEASANT, SC 29464 TEL: (843) 856-3080 WWW.TOMPSC.COM
FY - 2019 TST and CTC Project Ranking & Request
Intersection Improvements
1.) Mathis Ferry Road / Lauda Drive turn lane & signal installation improvements - $650,000
2.) Belle Hall Parkway / Paul Foster Road – Mini roundabout - $350,000
Drainage Improvements
1.) Shem Creek Park and Parking Improvements – Shem Creek Park - $550,000
2.) Roadside Ditch Restoration Program – Darrell Creek & Commonwealth - $1,040,000
Pedestrian and Bicycle
Higher speed/higher volume routes
1.) Rifle Range Road – Hamlin Road to Porcher’s Bluff Road - $818,000
2.) Porcher’s Bluff Road – Roundabout to South Morgan’s Point Road - $575,000
3.) Stuart Engals – Bowman Road to Ira Road - $355,000
4.) Rifle Range Road – Six Mile Road to Hamlin Road - $1,100,000
Lower speed/lower volume routes
1.) National Drive – Linksland Road to Victory Point Drive - $465,000
2.) Whilden Street – Hibben Street to Venning Street - $207,000
3.) Cottingham Drive – Pelzer Drive to Johnnie Dodds Boulevard frontage road - $490,000
4.) Pherigo Street – Coleman Boulevard to McCants Drive - $210,000
5.) Live Oak Drive – Bennett Street to Haddrell Street - $310,000
6.) Royall Avenue – McCants Drive to Center Street - $412,000
7.) Wakendaw Road – Whipple Road to Trident Tech Academy - $516,000
8.) Oakhaven Boulevard – Rifle Range Road to Oaklanding Road - $200,000
9.) Deer Creek Road – Existing Sidewalk to Commonwealth Road - $310,000
Town of Mount Pleasant
Sidewalk Evaluation Matrix
Project name: NATIONAL DRIVE
Project location: Linksland Rd. to Victory Point Dr.
Estimated Project Cost: $465,000.00
Project Benefits
Increases Accessibility: Value x weight = Total
Substantially (value = 10) 6 20 120
Moderately (value = 6)
Low (Value = 2)
Safety: Value x weight = Total
Recorded accidents in the past five years along route 20 0
More than 10 (value = 10), 7 to 10 (Value = 8), 4 to 6 (Value = 6), .
1 to 3 (value = 4), none (value = 2)
Connectivity
Schools - Proximity to school: Value x weight = Total
Less than 1/4 mile (Value = 10) 2 10 20
Between 1/4 and 1/2 mile (Value = 6)
Greater than 1/2 mile (Value = 2)
Parks, Recreational or Areas of Interest - proximity to: Value x weight = Total
Within 1 mile (Value = 10) 10 10 100
Between 1 and 2 miles (Value = 6)
Greater than 2 miles (Value = 2)
Commercial Areas - proximity to: Value x weight = Total
Less than 1/2 mile (Value=10) 10 10 100
Between 1/2 and 1 mile (Value=6)
Greater than 1 mile (Value = 2)
Transit Stops - proximity to: Value x weight = Total
Less than 1/2 mile (Value=10) 10 10 100
Between 1/2 and 1 mile (Value=6)
Greater than 1 mile (Value = 2)
Road Type
Road Type: Value x weight = Total
Major (value = 10) 6 10 60
Collector (value = 6)
Residential (Value = 2)
Bike and Pedestrian Network Plan
Network Plan: Value x weight = Total
Part of a recognized network (Value = 10) 10 5 50
List Plan:
Special Consideration
Special Consideration: Value x weight = Total
As determined by staff (Value = 1 thru 10) 5 0
Notes:
Funding Source:
Funding Source Notes: CTC, TST, TOMP
Project Ranking
PROJECT RANKING Total Points 550
revision Date: 12/2017
Transportation CIP Project Updates
February, 2018
Ongoing CIP Construction
• Coleman Boulevard Revitalization
New 2018 CIP Design
• Long Point Road Realignment and Extension
• Coleman Boulevard and Patriot’s Point Intersection
Improvements
• Billy Swails Boulevard Phase 4B
• Shem Creek Bridge Bike Lanes
• Park West Boulevard Widening
• All American Boulevard Extenstion
Coleman Boulevard Revitalization
Contractor: Blythe Development
Start Date: September 11, 2017
Completion Date: August 31, 2019
Status: TC Stage 1 – Westbound
• Construction community liaison visiting businesses
• Developed project website
• Church Street outfall complete
• Utility and drainage work continues on Simmons Street and
Coleman Boulevard. CRBR coordination has begun.
Long Point Road Realignment and Extension
Project Cost Estimate:
• $16,810,000 Fully funded via adoption of 2019-2023 CIP
Designer: JMT
Completion Date:
• Design: September 2019
• Construction: September 2022
Status: NEPA process ongoing. PIM February 22, 2018
Patriot’s Point Gateway Intersection Improvements
Project Cost Estimate:
• $6,765,800 Fully funded via adoption of 2019-2023 CIP
Consultant: STV Incorporated
Completion Date:
• Design and Permitting: February 2019
• Construction: December 2020
Status: Concept designs are complete. Get SCDOT buy-in of
improvement concept plan so cost estimates can be developed.
Billy Swails Boulevard 4B
Project Cost Estimate:
• $12,568,497 ($2,568,497 TOMP and $10,000,000 Federal)
Designer: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Completion Date:
• Design: August 2020
• Construction: August 2022
Status: Preliminary engineering began in August 2017. PIM
February 27, 2018. Traffic analysis and modeling is ongoing.
Shem Creek Bridge Bike Lanes
Project Cost Estimate:
• $791,000 ($158,000 TOMP and $633,000 Federal)
Consultant: CDM Smith
Completion Date:
• Design: June 2018
• Construction: December 2019
Status: Held public information meeting. Currently developing
preliminary plans and awaiting SCDOT approval of Project
Planning Report and design exception.
Park West Boulevard Widening
Project Cost Estimate:
• $8,517,445 – Fully funded via adoption of 2019-2023 CIP
Consultant: Mead and Hunt
Completion Date:
• Design: December 2018 – Construction: June 2021
Status: Design contract awarded and notice to proceed issued in
August 2017.
• Public meeting was held on October 26, 2017
• Typical section with bike lanes approved and a development
plan is under way.
All American Boulevard Extension
Project Cost Estimate:
• $5,171,000 – Fully funded via adoption of 2019-2023 CIP
Consultant: Mead and Hunt
Design: March 2018 - December 2019
Construction: March 2020 – December 2021
Status: Currently developing project scope of work with the
design to begin in March.
All American Blvd.
Transportation Sales Tax (TST) Projects
• SC-41 Widening – Public information meeting held and the
NEPA process is ongoing
• Park West Boulevard Left Turn Lane at the recreation complex
is complete.
• Park West Boulevard sidewalk roundabout to US-17 is
complete.
• Park West Boulevard sidewalk from Stockdale Street to the
recreation complex is under construction.
• Anna Knapp Boulevard sidewalk from Johnnie Dodds
Boulevard to Hibben Ferry is expected to begin the design
process next year.
Charleston Transportation Committee (CTC)
Projects
• Pelzer Drive sidewalk bids have exceeded the budget and the
County is to re-bid as part of a larger package.
• Lansing Drive sidewalk project is currently under design.
• Seacoast Parkway sidewalk project is funded in 2018 and
design is expected to begin in 2019
Get email alerts for Mount Pleasant
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.