Board of Zoning Appeals
Regular MeetingMurfreesboro, TN · September 23, 2020
Minutes
Regular Meeting Minutes of the Murfreesboro
Board of Zoning Appeals
September 23, 2020 – 1:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
MEMBERS VIDEO PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Davis Young, Chair
Misty Foy
Tim Tipps
Ken Halliburton
Julie King (present by phone in accordance with Executive Orders No. 16 issued by
Governor Bill Lee on March 20, 2020, as subsequently amended on May 6, 2020, by
Executive Order No. 34)
STAFF PRESENT
Jafar Ware, Planner
Roman Hankins, Assistant City Attorney
Matthew Blomeley, Assistant Planning Director
Marina Rush, Principal Planner
Brenda Davis, Recording Assistant
Chairman Young called the meeting to order at 1:00 P.M.
Chairman Young determined there was a quorum stating four members of the Board
were present in person and Ms. King was present by audio.
The minutes from the June 24, 2020 regular meeting were approved as submitted.
New Business
Special Use Permit
Application Z-20-029 by Mr. Clyde Rountree of Huddleston-Steele, Inc., for CWC
Partnership, is requesting a special use permit in order to expand an existing self-
service storage facility for property located in a Commercial Fringe (CF) zone at 1509
Brinkley Road.
Mr. Ware reviewed the application and staff comments. If the Board approves this
request, Staff recommends the following conditions of approval:
BZA Minutes
Regular Meeting
September 23, 2020
1) The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a site plan for review and
approval in accordance with the regulations set forth in the Zoning Ordinance.
The tree survey submitted with the special use permit application shall be
updated to include additional information on the existing vegetation along the
south property line as well as the property adjacent to 1465 Brinkley Road. The
updated tree survey shall be included in the site plan submittal.
2) Existing trees and other vegetation in good condition along the north, south, and
west property lines must be preserved. A tree preservation plan must be included
in the site plan submittal and appropriate tree protection measures must be in
place during construction.
3) A 15’-wide Type D buffer shall be required along the north, south, and west
property lines adjacent to Phases 3 and 4. The existing vegetation to be
preserved shall be supplemented with new materials as needed to achieve the
required Type D buffer.
4) All new buildings in Phases 3 and 4 shall be a minimum of 45’ off of the north
and west property lines with the exception of the easternmost building along the
northern property line (the 14-unit, 3080 ft2 building), which shall be a minimum
of 35’ off of the north property line.
5) The architecture of the proposed buildings in Phases 3 and 4 shall be subject to
the final review and approval of the Planning Department. However, the
architecture of the proposed buildings along the perimeter of the site shall be
substantially consistent with the architectural elevations submitted with this
special use permit application.
6) The gravel boat/RV storage area that is currently in violation must be remediated
and brought into compliance as a part of the Phase 3 construction. Measures to
be taken to remediate the violation shall be included in the Phase 3 site plan
submittal.
7) The easternmost outdoor storage area to be constructed in Phase 4 shall be
covered.
Mr. Blomeley spoke about the history of the property and the portion that is out of
compliance. Mr. Blomeley showed the concept plan that went before the Board of
Zoning Appeals back in 2014 when this was originally approved. He pointed out the
area that is currently being used for outdoor storage has never received any approval to
do that. Mr. Blomeley said it is currently graveled and in violation of the original
special use permit and site plan. The applicant has been made aware and he is
committed to bringing that into compliance. Mr. Blomeley said Staff has offered the
applicant to bring that into compliance with the construction of Phase III, rather than
seek immediate compliance. Mr. Blomeley gave the Board Members updated plans and
conditions of approval. Mr. Blomeley showed the updated Phase III plan and went over
some of the details of the plan.
2
BZA Minutes
Regular Meeting
September 23, 2020
Mr. Blomeley said since this Special Use Permit was originally approved in 2014, the
property to the north has developed with some homes that this application needs to be
sensitive to. He also mentioned a Type D buffer will be required and suggested
additional separation might be necessary to further mitigate any negative impact on the
adjacent homes. Finally, Mr. Blomeley said Staff wants to make sure the applicant
adheres to a certain level of quality regarding the elevations of their buildings, so that
they do not have a negative impact on the surrounding residential uses.
Mr. Blomeley and Mr. Ware were available to answer any questions along with Mr.
Rountree and Mr. Coleman.
Chairman Young referred to the northern and western boundary and asked if you would
be able to see through into the center of the development.
Mr. Blomeley said Mr. Coleman has submitted a tree survey and he is committing to
preserving the existing vegetation along the property line and anywhere there is a gap in
that vegetation that doesn’t qualify as a Type D buffer, he will supplement those existing
trees with additional trees to meet the Type D buffer requirements. Mr. Blomeley said
the tree survey that was provided depicts probably the least number of trees along the
northern property line adjacent to the two residential lots in the Blackman Station
Subdivision. This area will likely need some additional trees. One of the recommended
conditions of approval was that additional information is needed on the tree survey
regarding the vegetation along the southern property line and adjacent to the property at
1465 Brinkley Road. Mr. Blomeley said beyond that Type D buffer the buildings will
create a fortress around the perimeter of the site.
Mr. Clyde Rountree said the northern property line does have some gaps and the
applicant will do as Staff requires for the landscaping.
Mr. Young opened the public hearing.
Ms. Linda Robertson, 1465 Brinkley Road, said the storage facility itself has not been
much of a problem however the lighting and the RVs have been a problem as is people
playing radios late at night. She expressed concern about having more construction
since the construction has been on-going since 2015. Ms. Robertson said the things that
concern her are the RVs parked where she can see them. She said the existing trees are
only heavy in the summer, because they are deciduous trees; so, from October until
April all she sees are lights because her property sits up higher, so the lights shine
upward. She was very concerned about having more lights added to even more of her
property.
3
BZA Minutes
Regular Meeting
September 23, 2020
Mr. Tipps asked Ms. Robertson about the noise she spoke of and to explain what she
was referring to.
Ms. Robertson said she was not sure how late the facility stayed open but at 9:00 or
10:00 P.M. people come and unload their cars into their storage units. She said they
have their car doors open with their radios playing. She said it just gets noisy
particularly during good weather. She added that sometimes construction occurs in the
evening as well.
Vice-Chairman Halliburton verified that Ms. Robertson is seeing the RVs and lights
above the building that aligns with her property on the south side of the development.
Ms. Robertson said yes. She said she can only see about 12-inches of the top of the
RVs, but all the air conditioner units are clearly visible. She didn’t know what height
those buildings are that border her property, but they are not tall enough to hide an RV
or screen out the light that faces her property. She said the front of the building where
the office is located is very dark. All of the lights that are on the side of the property,
which are bright for security reasons, are also coming on to her property.
There being no one else to speak, Chairman Young closed the public hearing.
Mr. Blomeley asked Chairman Young if Mr. Coleman could address the noise issue
adding he feels this to be a management issue. Mr. Blomeley said the application states
the hours of operation are 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday thru Saturday and noon – 4:00
PM on Sunday. Mr. Blomeley referred to the lighting stating that over the years we
have received some complaints from Ms. Robertson and her husband about the lighting.
Staff has been in contact with Mr. Coleman about that. Mr. Blomeley said since this
was originally approved, we have adopted Design Guidelines with lighting standards
and our Zoning Ordinance has lighting standards. He said Staff could take a
comprehensive look at the lighting with the applicant to see if there is anything that can
be done not only about what is proposed but what is existing. He said it is a balance
because we certainly want to be aware of the impact to the neighbors but we also want
to make sure there is adequate lighting for safety and security purposes for people that
are going to be using the facility.
Chairman Young asked what type of buffer was currently in place next to Ms.
Robertson’s property.
Mr. Blomeley was not sure but he thinks a Type D buffer would have been required in
2014 by the Zoning Ordinance. He said it looks like they attempted to utilize some of
the existing vegetation and it looks like there are a row of trees planted along the
property line as well, pointing out there is newer vegetation closer to the building itself.
He added that new vegetation takes years to mature.
4
BZA Minutes
Regular Meeting
September 23, 2020
Mr. Tipps asked Mr. Blomeley when the photo was taken.
Mr. Blomeley said in the winter of 2020.
Mr. Tipps verified that the landscaping Mr. Blomeley just described would be
considered a Type D buffer.
Mr. Blomeley said that is correct.
Mr. Tipps asked about the maximum light fixture height.
Mr. Blomeley said from memory he believes for buildings that are at this height, less
than 35-feet, maximum lighting fixture height is either 16 or 20-feet. Mr. Blomeley
asked Ms. Rush if she knew the height requirement.
Ms. Rush said for buildings of this height, less than 35-feet, maximum the lighting
fixture height is 16-feet.
Mr. Blomeley said the maximum height for free-standing light fixtures is 16-feet. He
didn’t know if they planned to use free-standing light fixtures or if they would solely be
using wall pack lights attached to the buildings. He asked Mr. Rountree or Mr. Coleman
to address that. He said regardless of whether the lighting is attached or free-standing
light fixtures there will have to be pointed downward and shields used to prevent the
glare on the adjacent properties. Mr. Blomeley asked Mr. Coleman to address the type
of lighting he plans to use at this facility.
Mr. Coleman said they only have wall packs. He said the Robertsons had an issue
before regarding the lighting and he installed blinders on all the wall packs to force the
light down. Mr. Coleman thought he had taken care of the lighting issue.
Vice-Chairman Halliburton asked if the wall-pack lights are located on the exterior
walls.
Mr. Coleman said they didn’t do anything on the exterior. Everything they have on a
wall-pack is still interior.
Ms. King referred to page 13 of the agenda and said it looks like there are two of those
lights in that picture. She asked Mr. Coleman if that is correct.
Mr. Coleman agreed stating that is an example of a wall-pack light.
Ms. King asked if those are the only types of lights in the facility.
5
BZA Minutes
Regular Meeting
September 23, 2020
Mr. Coleman said yes, those are the only lights they have inside the facility.
Mr. Tipps referred to the RV storage and asked if those lights will be covered.
Mr. Coleman said some of the area won’t have any lighting and some will have a
canopy.
Mr. Blomeley reviewed the proposed changes for the site again.
Ms. Foy asked Mr. Coleman to address the hours of operation and the noise concern.
Mr. Coleman said the gate access hours are from 6:00 a.m. until 10:00 p.m. 7-days a
week. He said office hours are 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.
Chairman Young asked if you make it thru the gate at 9:59 p.m., you can leave
whenever you like?
Mr. Coleman said they can still get out, if they are in before 10:00 p.m.
Mr. Coleman said they try to be good neighbors and need input from the neighbors if
there is noise that needs to be addressed.
Vice-Chairman Halliburton referred to the lighting issue as he is having a difficult time
understanding. He said if the lights are on the interior of the facility, where is the light
coming from that is hitting Ms. Robertson’s trees and property.
Mr. Blomeley said he doesn’t know for certain but knows there is a grade change stating
Ms. Robertson’s property is a little bit higher than the storage facility so maybe from her
property you are looking down and the lights that are near the tops of those buildings
could be going towards her property. Mr. Blomeley said he was not certain.
Ms. Robertson offered to explain the situation if the Board would allow her to speak
again.
Vice-Chairman Halliburton and Mr. Tipps both agreed to hear from Ms. Robertson
again.
Ms. Robertson said the lights have a screen across the top of it, but the bottom part of
the lights is not screened and they face directly outward. She said if they were placed to
shine downward or screened in a different way the problem might be eliminated.
6
BZA Minutes
Regular Meeting
September 23, 2020
Mr. Coleman said when he got the contractor to go out there, he thought they had that
worked out the lighting issues. Mr. Coleman said there is a shield on the light pack that
shines the light down. He said his contractor turned down the brightness of the lights as
well.
Chairman Young asked if this Board has given the Planning Commission information to
work with regarding the site plan review of this project.
Mr. Blomeley said yes and that Staff can continue to work with the applicant on
improving the lighting situation. He said that Ms. Rush will be reviewing the site plan
and she is hearing these comments today. Mr. Blomeley said improving the lighting
conditions can be made a condition of approval for Staff to continue to work through
this issue during the site plan review process.
Ms. King asked if there were any conditions the Board could place on the approval as
far as light footcandles along the perimeter of the property.
Mr. Blomeley said the Zoning Ordinance already speaks to that. He said it is a
maximum of 0.5 footcandles at the property line which is really a negligible amount. He
said the only lesser would be zero footcandles at the property line. Mr. Blomeley was
not sure how much of a difference that would make from 0.5 to at the property line to 0
at the property line.
Ms. King said the BZA would be anticipating that Staff would be working with the
applicant to make sure that the site is in line with the Zoning Ordinance.
Mr. Blomeley agreed and said with the additional information that Ms. Robertson has
provided about how it is impacting her property will give Staff the information they
need to work with Mr. Coleman and his team to see what can be done out in the field.
He said perhaps there is a different type of shield that might direct the light further
downward instead of the shield they are currently using. Mr. Blomeley asked Mr.
Coleman his thoughts about working with Staff on reviewing the existing lighting to see
if any improvements can be made.
Mr. Coleman said yes, he is open to working with Staff.
Chairman Young expressed again appreciation for everyone’s cooperation.
Vice-Chairman Halliburton made a motion to approve the request with the
following conditions:
1) The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a site plan for
review and approval in accordance with the regulations set forth in the
Zoning Ordinance. The tree survey submitted with the special use permit
7
BZA Minutes
Regular Meeting
September 23, 2020
application shall be updated to include additional information on the
existing vegetation along the south property line as well as the property
adjacent to 1465 Brinkley Road. The updated tree survey shall be included
in the site plan submittal.
2) Existing trees and other vegetation in good condition along the north, south,
and west property lines must be preserved. A tree preservation plan must
be included in the site plan submittal and appropriate tree protection
measures must be in place during construction.
3) A 15’-wide Type D buffer shall be required along the north, south, and west
property lines adjacent to Phases 3 and 4. The existing vegetation to be
preserved shall be supplemented with new materials as needed to achieve
the required Type D buffer.
4) All new buildings in Phases 3 and 4 shall be a minimum of 45’ off of the
north and west property lines with the exception of the easternmost building
along the northern property line (the 14-unit, 3080 ft2 building), which shall
be a minimum of 35’ off of the north property line.
5) The architecture of the proposed buildings in Phases 3 and 4 shall be subject
to the final review and approval of the Planning Department. However, the
architecture of the proposed buildings along the perimeter of the site shall
be substantially consistent with the architectural elevations submitted with
this special use permit application.
6) The gravel boat/RV storage area that is currently in violation must be
remediated and brought into compliance as a part of the Phase 3
construction. Measures to be taken to remediate the violation shall be
included in the Phase 3 site plan submittal.
7) The easternmost outdoor storage area to be constructed in Phase 4 shall be
covered.
8) The applicant shall work with the Planning Department during review of
the Phase 3 and 4 site plans on ways to decrease the impact of the site
lighting onto adjacent residential properties. In addition, the applicant shall
work with the Planning Department on ways to decrease the impact of the
existing site lighting in Phases 1 and 2.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Tipps. Upon roll call, the motion was passed by
the following vote:
Aye: Misty Foy
Julie King
Tim Tipps
Ken Halliburton
Davis Young
8
BZA Minutes
Regular Meeting
September 23, 2020
Nay: None
Staff Reports and Other Business
Approval of the 2021 BZA Calendar
Mr. Blomeley referred to the proposed BZA Calendar included in the agenda package
today that reflects the submittal deadlines and monthly meeting dates. He asked for a
motion to approve the calendar as submitted.
Mr. Tipps made a motion to approve the 2021 BZA calendar. The motion was
seconded by Ms. Foy. Upon roll call, the motion was passed by the following vote:
Aye: Misty Foy
Julie King
Tim Tipps
Ken Halliburton
Davis Young
Nay: None
The meeting adjourned at 1:50 P.M.
_____________________________ _______________________________
CHAIRMAN SECRETARY
9
Agenda
CITY OF MURFREESBORO
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Regular Meeting, September 23, 2020, at 1:00 p.m.
City Hall, 111 West Vine Street, Council Chambers, 1st Floor
AGENDA
1. Call to order
2. Determination of a quorum
3. Consideration of minutes for the regular meeting on June 24, 2020
4. New Business
Special Use Permit Request
a. Application Z-20-029 by Mr. Clyde Rountree of Huddleston-Steele, Inc.,
for CWC Partnership, is requesting a special use permit in order to expand
an existing self-service storage facility for property located in a Commercial
Fringe (CF) zone at 1509 Brinkley Road. (Project Planner: Jafar Ware)
5. Staff Reports and Other Business
a. Approval of 2021 BZA Calendar
6. Adjourn
1
Regular Meeting Minutes of the Murfreesboro
Board of Zoning Appeals
June 24, 2020 – 1:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
Davis Young, Chair Ken Halliburton, Vice-Chair
Misty Foy
Tim Tipps
Julie King (present by phone in accordance with Executive Orders No. 16 issued by
Governor Bill Lee on March 20, 2020, as subsequently amended on May 6, 2020, by
Executive Order No. 34)
STAFF PRESENT
Austin Cooper, Planner
David Ives, Deputy City Attorney
Matthew Blomeley, Assistant Planning Director
Brenda Davis, Recording Assistant
Chairman Young called the meeting to order at 1:05 P.M.
Chairman Young determined there was a quorum.
The minutes from the May 27, 2020 regular meeting were approved as submitted.
New Business
Special Use Permit Amendment / Special Use Permit Request
Application Z-20-027 by Mr. Matt Taylor of SEC, Inc., for Providence Christian
Academy, is making the following requests for property located in a Residential Single-
Family (RS-15) zone at 410 Dejarnette Lane:
▪ To amend a special use permit that was approved by the Board of Zoning
Appeals in March 2019 for the expansion of an existing institutional group
assembly use (a private school). The March 2019 special use permit allowed for
the temporary placement of two portable classroom buildings. Approval was
conditioned upon the portable classroom buildings being removed no later than
September 27, 2020. The applicant seeks to amend the March 2019 special use
permit approval to allow these two portable classroom buildings to remain on-
site until June 30, 2021.
BZA Minutes
Regular Meeting
June 24, 2020
▪ A special use permit for the expansion of an existing institutional group
assembly use (a private school). The special use permit request consists of the
placement of an additional portable classroom building to be removed no later
than June 30, 2021.
Mr. Cooper reviewed the application and staff comments. If the Board approves this
request, Staff recommends the following conditions of approval:
1) All 3 portable buildings must be removed by June 30, 2021 or upon the issuance
of a certificate of occupancy for the permanent building, whichever comes first.
2) A site plan must be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
3) Traffic control measures, as determined during the site plan review process, may
be required if needed to eliminate internal traffic conflicts due to the placement
of the portable buildings.
The applicant, Mr. Matt Taylor, was present to answer any questions.
Mr. Tipps asked why the applicants are asking for an extension when the Board of
Zoning Appeals approved this in 2019 to get them through September 2020.
Mr. Taylor stated construction is taking longer than anticipated. He said they had to go
through a couple of redesigns to get it back in budget.
Chairman Young asked at what point will this property be full and asked if there is a
long-range plan for the property.
Mr. Taylor went over the master plan. He said with Phase I they will be adding all the
parking on the east side of the site. He said they will add about the same amount of
parking on the west side of the site with Phase I as well. Mr. Taylor said Phase I is
under construction now. He said there is a wetland on the property and that is where the
parking stops. Mr. Taylor said there is a small future expansion and a kitchen area on
the south side of the building stating that the site is very close to being maxed out.
Mr. Blomeley said in the original special use permit in 2019, the applicants projected
when construction would be complete. He said the process has taken longer than they
anticipated. Mr. Taylor asked for a removal date of June 30, 2021 but Staff is
recommending June 30, 2021 or when the certificate of occupancy is issued for the
buildings under construction now, whichever is sooner. He said that would mean the
buildings would be removed no later than June 30, 2021 but possibly earlier should their
C of O be issued sooner than that. Mr. Blomeley asked Mr. Taylor if that would be an
acceptable condition.
2
BZA Minutes
Regular Meeting
June 24, 2020
Mr. Taylor said yes, adding they are as eager to get rid of the portables as the BZA is
eager to see them go away.
Mr. Tipps verified there were two different issues to decide; (1) amending the 2019
special use permit and (2) the need for the 3rd portable. He wanted to know how we
arrived at that.
Mr. Blomeley said the 2019 special use permit was just for two portables and the
condition of approval was for those to be removed by September 2020. We have to
amend that special use permit so their approval period is extended and then there is a
different special use permit for the additional portable they are asking to be placed on
the property for that same period of time.
Mr. Tipps said he understood that but was wondering why a third portable is needed. He
asked if the additional portable was needed because of growth.
Mr. Taylor agreed growth is the reason for the additional portable, as they have recently
been able to get a better handle on enrollment for the coming school year.
Chairman Young opened the public hearing. There being no one to speak for or against
the application, Chairman Young closed the public hearing.
Mr. Tipps made a motion to approve an amendment to a special use permit that
was approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals in March 2019 for the expansion of
an existing institutional group assembly use (a private school) in order to allow the
portable to remain on-site until June 30, 2021 subject to the following conditions:.
1) All 3 portables must be removed by June 30, 2021 or upon the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the permanent building, whichever comes first.
2) A site plan must be submitted for review and approved prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
3) Traffic control measures, as determined during the site plan review process,
may be required if needed to eliminate internal traffic conflicts due to the
placement of the portable buildings.
The motion was seconded by Ms. Foy. Upon roll call, the motion was passed by the
following vote:
Aye: Misty Foy
Julie King
Tim Tipps
Davis Young
Nay: None
3
BZA Minutes
Regular Meeting
June 24, 2020
Ms. Foy made a motion to approve a special use permit for the expansion of an
existing institutional group assembly use (a private school) for the placement of an
additional portable classroom building to be removed no later than June 30, 2021
subject to the following conditions:
1) All 3 portables must be removed by June 30, 2021 or upon the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the permanent building, whichever comes first.
2) A site plan must be submitted for review and approved prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
3) Traffic control measures, as determined during the site plan review process,
may be required if needed to eliminate internal traffic conflicts due to the
placement of the portable buildings.
The motion was seconded by Ms. King. Upon roll call, the motion was passed by
the following vote:
Aye: Misty Foy
Julie King
Tim Tipps
Davis Young
Nay: None
Staff Reports and Other Business
None
The meeting adjourned at 1:10 P.M.
_____________________________ _______________________________
CHAIRMAN SECRETARY
4
MURFREESBORO BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
STAFF REPORT
SEPTEMBER 23, 2020
PROJECT PLANNER: JAFAR WARE
Application: Z-20-029
Location: 1509 Brinkley Road
Applicant: Mr. Sam Coleman, represented by Mr. Clyde Rountree of Huddleston-Steele
Engineering, Inc.
Owner: CWC Partnership
Zoning: CF (Commercial Fringe)
Request: A special use permit to expand an existing self-service storage facility
1
Overview of Request
The applicant, Clyde Rountree of Huddleston-Steele Engineering, Inc., representing Sam Coleman
of CWC Partnership, is requesting a Special Use Permit for the expansion of an existing self-
service storage facility located at 1509 Brinkley Road. The subject property has a total area of
10.52 acres and is zoned CF (Commercial Fringe District). On March 26, 2014, the Board of
Zoning Appeals (BZA) approved the original Special Use Permit for a self-service storage facility
at this location. It is currently developed with eight storage buildings and a small office building
at the front of the site. The applicant wishes to expand the current self-service storage facility in
two phases and will continue the “fortress style” storage buildings along the northern and southern
property lines in Phase 3. The “fortress style” forms a barrier comprised of buildings around the
perimeter of the site. In addition, the applicant proposes paving an existing gravel area currently
used for parking for boats, RVs, etc… during this phase. This existing gravel area has never been
approved and is composed of a non-compliant travel surface. It is currently in violation of the
City’s Zoning Ordinance. This violation will need to be remedied with the construction of Phase
3.
In Phase 4 of the expansion, the applicant proposes the following: a “fortress style” storage
building along the western or rear property line; constructing an 11,900 square-foot climate-
controlled storage building (with the addition of 12 adjacent parking spaces); paving the rear
interior area of the site with a concrete surface for both covered and open storage of vehicles. The
concept plan submitted with the original 2014 special use permit did not include the development
of the entire tract all the way to its western property line. The current plan submitted proposes to
modify the layout of the unconstructed remainder of the 2014 concept plan and expand the
proposed development beyond what was contemplated in the 2014 special use permit request.
The area of expansion is surrounded by single-family residential zoning and uses, so, in
discussions with the applicant, Staff has emphasized that sensitivity to those neighboring
residential uses must be considered in the design of this expansion. To the south, zoned RS-15
(Residential Single-Family), is a large single-family residential parcel as well as lots in the
Meadowland Subdivision. To the west, zoned RS-12 (Residential Single-Family), is the Princeton
Oaks Subdivision. To the north, zoned PRD (Planned Residential District), is the Blackman
Station residential development, which consists of both single-family attached and single-family
detached dwellings. The single-family dwellings to the north and west are closer to the Pack Rat
property line than those to the south. The homes to the south are several hundred feet from the
common property line.
Relevant Zoning Ordinance Sections
Chart 1 of the City of Murfreesboro Zoning Ordinance allows self-service storage as a special use
in the CF district. Special provisions are set forth for self-service storage in Section 9(D)(2)(uuu)
in addition to the Standards of General Applicability in Section 9(C). The applicant has affirmed
in his special use permit application letter that the proposed use will be constructed in compliance
with all zoning requirements.
2
The applicable standards are listed below with information from Staff on how the applicant intends
to address them.
Standards of General Applicability with Staff analysis:
1) The proposed building or use will not have a substantial or undue adverse effect upon
adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility
facilities, and other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare:
Self-service storage uses typically have minimal traffic and utility impact. The applicants are
attempting to mitigate any potential negative impact on the adjacent residential uses by not
having outside storage areas directly adjacent to the property boundary, preserving existing
trees at the property boundary, planting a Type D buffer along the property boundary, and
increasing the quality of the architecture of the buildings along the perimeter.
2) The proposed building or use will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as to be
compatible with the immediate vicinity and not to interfere with the development and
use of adjacent property in accordance with the applicable district regulations:
The applicants are attempting to mitigate any potential negative impact on the adjacent
residential uses by not having outside storage areas directly adjacent to the property boundary,
preserving existing trees at the property boundary, planting a Type D buffer along the property
boundary, and increasing the quality of the architecture of the buildings along the perimeter.
3) The proposed buildings or use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and
services such as highways, streets, parking spaces, drainage structures, refuse disposal,
fire protection, water and sewers; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the
establishment of the proposed use will provide adequately for such services:
Staff does not anticipate a strain on the roadway network, utilities, or other services as a result
of the expansion.
4) The proposed building or use will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of any
feature determined by the BZA to be significant natural, scenic, or historic importance:
No features of significant natural, scenic, or historic importance have been identified on the
subject property in the vicinity of the proposed parking lot expansion.
5) The proposed building or use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the
particular provision of this section authorizing such use:
The applicant indicates that the proposed use will comply with the additional standards for the
use of self-service storage facility. (See below for additional detail.)
3
Additional Standards for Self-service storage facilities with Staff Analysis:
(1) the following activities shall be prohibited:
a. auctions; commercial, wholesale, or retail sales; and miscellaneous or garage
sales;
b. the servicing, repairing, or fabrication of motor vehicles, boats, trailers, lawn
mowers, appliances, or other similar equipment;
c. the operation of power tools, spray painting equipment, table saws, lathes,
compressors, welding equipment, kilns, or other similar equipment;
d. the establishment of a transfer or storage business;
e. the using, operating, or permitting to be played, used or operated any radio
receiving set, musical instrument, phonograph, live band, amplifiers,
loudspeakers, or other machine or device for producing or reproducing sound
in such a manner as to disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring
residents at any time with louder volume than is necessary for convenient
hearing for the persons responsible for producing or reproducing such sound;
f. any use of individual units for residential purposes, including but not limited
to cooking or sleeping;
g. any use that is noxious or offensive because of odors, dust, noise, fumes, or
vibrations; or
h. Any lot on which a self-service storage facility is located shall have a minimum
separation of three hundred (300) feet from any major intersection. For
purposes of this subsection, “major intersection” shall be defined as the
nearest intersection of the rights-of-way of any two arterial streets; any
arterial street and any collector street; or any two collector streets.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the owner or manager of the mini-storage
facility may conduct auctions and repair and maintain the premises when
reasonably required in the usual and customary operation of the ministorage
business
The applicant indicates in his letter that he is aware of these prohibitions and that the current
use of the property is compliant and the expansion will continue to be compliant. With
respect to “h”, the facility is not within 300’ of a major intersection.
(2) for self-service storage facilities that have a side or rear property line abutting a
property used for single family purposes or classified in the RS or RD classifications
or the residential portion of a planned development a minimum ten foot wide
landscape strip shall be provided which shall be planted in accordance with Section
27 of this article and at the discretion of the BZA may include earth berms, masonry
fences, or walls. The applicant or owner shall post a surety instrument to assure the
landscaping and screening will be maintained the first three years;
A 15’ Type D buffer is required by ordinance along the north, south, and west lot lines,
exceeding the 10’ landscape strip requirement noted above. In addition, as mentioned
previously, the applicant is committing to preserving the existing trees along the north,
south, and west property boundaries. The existing trees will be supplemented with
4
additional plantings to create the required Type D buffer. In addition, the buildings along
the northern and western property lines are situated 45’ off of the property line (exceeding
the 25’ minimum building setback by 20’) in order to provide more separation from the
adjacent single-family dwellings.
(3) self-service storage facilities shall provide on-site a minimum ten-foot landscape strip
along the front property line abutting all public rights-of-way. This landscape strip
shall be planted in accordance with Section 27 of this article and at the discretion of
the BZA may include earth berms, masonry fences or walls;
In staff’s opinion, a 10’ landscape strip is not applicable to this special use permit
application, as the requested expansion will not abut any public rights-of-way -- it will all
be constructed at the rear of the site. The front of the site along Brinkley Road is not
affected.
(4) all storage shall be indoors. However, an area may be provided on-site to be used for
outdoor storage of RVs, trailers, cars, and boats. Such area shall be used exclusively
for this purpose and shall be screened from the view of adjoining residential areas in
the manner as described in sub-sections 2 and 3 above; and,
A large area internal to the site is proposed for the outdoor storage of the aforementioned
items. This area will be screened from the adjacent residential uses by both the existing
and proposed landscaping as well as the storage buildings themselves, which will have a
predominantly masonry façade.
(5) the BZA may require additional standards be met including additional screening,
placement of screening, placement and orientation of on-site lighting and security
systems in order to assure the compatibility of the proposed location with adjoining
properties.
The applicant has been made aware of this standard.
Recommended Conditions of Approval:
If the Board approves this request, Staff recommends the following conditions of approval:
1) The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a site plan for review and approval
in accordance with the regulations set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. The tree survey
submitted with the special use permit application shall be updated to include additional
information on the existing vegetation along the south property line as well as the property
adjacent to 1465 Brinkley Road. The updated tree survey shall be included in the site plan
submittal.
2) Existing trees and other vegetation in good condition along the north, south, and west
property lines must be preserved. A tree preservation plan must be included in the site plan
submittal and appropriate tree protection measures must be in place during construction.
5
3) A 15’-wide Type D buffer shall be required along the north, south, and west property lines
adjacent to Phases 3 and 4. The existing vegetation to be preserved shall be supplemented
with new materials as needed to achieve the required Type D buffer.
4) All new buildings in Phases 3 and 4 shall be a minimum of 45’ off of the north and west
property lines.
5) The architecture of the proposed buildings in Phases 3 and 4 shall be subject to the final
review and approval of the Planning Department. However, the architecture of the
proposed buildings along the perimeter of the site shall be substantially consistent with the
architectural elevations submitted with this special use permit application.
6) The gravel boat/RV storage area that is currently in violation must be remediated and
brought into compliance as a part of the Phase 3 construction. Measures to be taken to
remediate the violation shall be included in the Phase 3 site plan submittal.
Attached Exhibits
1. Applicant’s Request Letter
2. Site Photos
3. 2014 Concept Plan submitted to BZA
4. Proposed Phase 3 Concept Plan
5. Proposed Phase 4 Concept Plan
6. Tree Survey
7. Architectural Elevations
6
Attachment 1: Applicant’s Request Letter
7
8
9
10
Attachment 2: Site Photos
Facing west
11
Facing north west
12
Facing north
Facing east
13
Facing south
14
2014 Special Use Permit Concept Plan
\\ACAD209\Land Projects 3\Pack Rat II - Brinkley Road\dwg\Phase 3 - 50 Scale Master.dwg, 9/1/2020 10:26:44 AM, ACAD109
\\ACAD209\Land Projects 3\Pack Rat II - Brinkley Road\dwg\Phase 3 - 50 Scale Master.dwg, 9/3/2020 2:13:24 PM, ACAD109
SCOTT WILSON
ARCHITECT, LLC
STANDING SEAM METAL
ROOF
STANDING SEAM METAL
ROOF
ALTERNATE BRICK COLOR
ALTERNATE BRICK COLOR
BRICK VENEER BRICK DETAIL
BRICK WATER TABLE
BRICK WATER TABLE BRICK VENEER
SPLIT FACE BLOCK
SPLIT FACE BLOCK
SIDE ELEVATION-ENLARGED ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION-ENLARGED ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0"
*NOTE: MATERIAL & COLORS
TO MATCH EXISTING BUILDINGS
ALL PHASE III BUILDINGS TO
MATCH DETAIL AND COLOR
REPRESENTED IN THIS EXHIBIT
REAR (NORTH) ELEVATION-FACES NEIGBOORHOOD)
1"=20'
PACK RAT SELF STORAGE
1509 BRINKLEY RD.
MURFRESSBORO, TN 37128
PHASE III BUILDING EXHIBIT- BUILDING ELEVATIONS
CITY OF MURFREESBORO
2021 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS (BZA) CALENDAR
Monthly Submittal Deadline BZA Meeting Date
(3:00 PM) (1:00 PM)
January 11 January 27
February 8 February 24
March 8 March 24
April 12 April 28
May 10 May 26
June 7 June 23
July 12 July 28
August 9 August 25
September 3 September 22
October 11 October 27
November 1 November 22
November 29 December 20
Get email alerts for Murfreesboro
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.