Council of the Municipality of Murrysville

Regular Voting Meeting – Wednesday, January 21, 2015 Council of the Municipality of Murrysville held a Regular Voting Meeting on Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in the Municipal Building. Present at the meeting were Council members Regis Synan, Joan Kearns, Jeffery Kepler, William Vance, Loren Kase, and David Perry. Councilman Josh Lorenz was absent. Also present were Mayor Robert Brooks, Chief Administrator James R. Morrison, Solicitor George A. Kotjarapoglus, and Municipal Planner Allen Cohen. MAYOR BROOKS WELCOMES THE DELMONT-SALEM ROTARY Mayor Brooks welcomed two members of the Delmont-Salem Rotary, Chris Tomley and John Harvey. Mr. Tomley spoke about the Rotary foreign exchange program and noted that last year they sponsored a student from Brazil, while this year they are hosting a student from Germany. He gave information on the Rotary’s meeting time and place and invited interested people to attend to learn more about the group. Mr. Harvey introduced his wife, Cindy, who helps with some of the Rotary’s fundraising activities. He talked about Rotary’s motto – “Service Above Self” – and said that 100% of all funds raised go directly to benefitting the community and supporting their projects. He spoke about the Coats for Kids program, which he chaired this year, and which teamed up with “Operation Warm.” The Rotary provided 62 coats to children in Metzgar, McCullough and Heritage Elementary Schools. Mayor Brooks presented the Rotarians with a plaque in recognition of the service provided to the community. REGULAR VOTING MEETING AGENDA UNISTED AMENDMENTS: None. Mr. Kepler moved to approve the agenda as presented. Mr. Kase seconded. All present voted aye. Motion approved. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS: 4A. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 4B. INVESTMENTS AND TRANSFERS 4C. JANUARY 5, 2015 MEETING MINUTES TO BE APPROVED Mr. Synan moved to approve the Consent Calendar Items. Mr. Vance seconded. All present voted aye. Motion approved. COMMUNITY INPUT: Roberta Cook, 109 Henry Hudson Drive, a member of the Comprehensive Plan committee, said she was pleased, in general, with how the Plan was arranged; it was more inclusive of ideas and viewpoints of different individuals; it included data from Westmoreland County, the Pittsburgh metropolitan area and eastern Allegheny County. She said she believes it is important to choose a demographic group that is equivalent of Murrysville’s, both in the make-up of the population and the economics of the population. She said she believes car 1/22/15 Regular Voting Meeting – Wednesday, January 21, 2015 the Comp Plan is a snapshot of where the community has been, where it is now, and possible directions that it can go in the future. It is not a definite hard and fast plan, but a concept blueprint of what is possible. She continued by saying that communities have to change to survive; development is inevitable – it would be illegal, unwise and impossible to try to prevent development. As she sees the Comp Plan, it is a plan to help the community evolve into the future in a positive way; communities that do not evolve die. She urged residents to respect the process of the Plan, the work, research and hours that went into it, and the opinions and data included. Alyson Holt, 4830 Primrose Lane, thanked Mr. Morrison for providing her with a summary of the editing changes members of Council have provided for the Energy Resources section of the Comprehensive Plan and noted her appreciation for several changes made. She made mention of a pending oil and gas ordinance in Peters Township and urged members of Council to read this document. She cited several sections of the ordinance and contrasted it with the pending Penn Township ordinance. She asked Council to consider how Murrysville leaders can dialogue with Penn Township’s leaders to best protect Murrysville residents’ health, welfare and safety, as Penn Township’s decisions will impact residents of Murrysville. Ms. Holt’s written comments are on file in the Municipal office. Mayor Brooks asked Mr. Morrison how far the proposed well in Penn Township is from Murrysville. Mr. Morrison said there are three sites presently being considered: one in Level Green approximately 800’ across the Turnpike from the nearest Murrysville resident; the Quest well on Mellon Road near William Penn Care Center, approximately ¾ mile from residents; he didn’t mention the third site. Dennis Skeers, 3965 Murry Highlands Circle, said he appreciated the public input at the January 5 public hearing on the Energy Resources section of the Comprehensive Plan draft and offered suggestions for changes to that section. Mr. Skeers’ suggested wording is on file in the Municipal office. Sarah Hough, 6718 Hillcrest, requested that Council designate an elected official to represent Murrysville at the upcoming Penn Township Commissioners’ meeting on February 5. Penn Township is in the process of revising its Oil & Gas Ordinance and has indicated it will permit a representative from each community to speak at the meeting. She said there are currently five pending applications for sites, three of which abut Penn Township’s borders with Murrysville and are located very close together. She said Penn Township hasn’t taken into consideration the proximity of the proposed industrial sites to residential areas in Murrysville, Trafford or Level Green. She also has concerns about the impact on property values and the increased truck traffic on Route 22 and smaller roads in the Municipality. She is most concerned about whether Penn Township has or intends to require a public evacuation plan in the event of an emergency at any of the three sites, particularly those located near Rt. 22. She continued by saying that thousands of Murrysville’s citizens are without a voice and stand to lose a great deal unless Penn Township alters its overlay proposal to protect Murrysville’s residential areas. Mr. Morrison clarified that an appointed or elected official will be permitted to speak at Penn Township’s upcoming meeting. car 1/22/15 Regular Voting Meeting – Wednesday, January 21, 2015 WORKSHOP ITEMS ADMINISTRATION: 12A. DISCUSSION ON THE BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES’ NUMBER OF MEMBERS AND LENGTH OF TERMS. Mr. Morrison said that, because there have been problems filling seats on some of the boards and commissions, he reviewed the enabling legislation and the State Statutes that govern the various boards and commissions in the Municipality. Of particular interest to him were the Personnel Board and the EAC; the Personnel Board being a critical part of a grievance or civil service proceeding of the police in that they are the third step in a grievance procedure. For a number of months in 2014, there were not enough members for a quorum. He said that those types of activities are sensitive and it is very important that there is a sitting board. The EAC is the first board to see a lot of plans and proposed developments and provide critical comments to both the Planning Commission and Council through the process. Mr. Morrison noted that when the Planning Commission was expanded from five to seven members in 2001, the Ordinance says that the Commission is to have seven members, but notes that five are to be citizen members, which suggests that the other two members could possibly be an elected or appointed official, as long as they were residents. He hasn’t been able to gain any additional information from the minutes during that adoption period as to why that language was inserted; Mr. Morrison is referring this to the Solicitor for an opinion. Mr. Morrison noted the dates that several of the boards and commissions were expanded and then went on to discuss the Zoning Hearing Board, which is a quasi-judicial board. This board takes evidentiary hearings on variances and other appeals of the zoning ordinance; there are time-sensitive matters that need to be addressed. This board was expanded from three to five in 2001 and has been a member short for some time. The Traffic Impact Advisory Commission is a function of the traffic impact fee that was put in place in early to mid-2000. Although there are eleven members on that commission, it does not necessarily have to have eleven members. The amendment to the ordinance stated that the Planning Commission shall be the advisory board and that 40% of that board must be realtors, engineers and such; so if the Planning Commission is made up of those people to meet the 40% requirement, you only need seven members. The eleven members at the time it was established was probably because of the make-up of the Planning Commission at that time and those four members were added. Mr. Morrison then discussed the UCC Board, which is a five-member board, but does not have to be a five- member board. There has never been a full board since the original appointment of the five members and they have never met since the inception. He said he could not find anything in the State Statute that defined a minimum number of members, so he believes that three would be the minimum number of board members. The FTMSA is a five-member board established in 1967. There is one member that turns over every year. car 1/22/15 Regular Voting Meeting – Wednesday, January 21, 2015 Mr. Morrison brought this information forth as background as to where the Boards and Commissions got to this point. He said it is important to have active members on the boards because they do serve specific functions, and if there are challenges in filling the board as Council has experienced over the last few years, Council may have alternatives to consider. There were no questions from Council; however, Mrs. Kearns noted that any changes that would be made would have to be by ordinance. 12B. DISCUSSION OF MURRYSVILLE COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION’S INVESTMENT OF BANNER PARK SALE PROCEEDS. Mr. Morrison provided Council background information on the arrangement between the MECDC and Council concerning Banner Park and the development of that parcel of ground. The agreement is basically a Purchase Money Mortgage which gave the MECDC the opportunity to market the property and also to borrow against the value of the property. The agreement included a provision regarding the splitting of the proceeds if the property was ever sold; the property was sold as part of the Blue Spruce development. The agreement also specifically identified how the MECDC was to use the money: in furtherance of the Streetscape project and for investments along Route 22. There have not been any projects identified to date, and it has been suggested that Council and the MECDC should plan to meet and think about the use of the money. After some research and consultation on what to do with the funds until a final decision is made, the MECDC has recommended a Vanguard short-term corporate bond index fund, which is a no-load fund, in which to invest the money. This is being brought forth to Council as an information item and to receive any comments. Mayor Brooks said that the MECDC is getting very little return on the money (under 1%). The bond fund recommended will probably earn 3% on the investment. Mr. Perry said this fund is not a guarantee and asked if the MECDC could possibly lose part of the principal. Mayor Brooks said this is as close to a GIC and could move because the bonds are somewhat flexible. He advised that John Cardwell said that the MECDC’s advisor said these are “like” GICs. There were no additional questions and no further discussion on this item. COUNCIL - ACTION ITEMS ADMINISTRATION: 13A. CONSIDER AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE ORDINANCE NO. 922-15, AN ORDINANCE SETTING THE POLICE PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS FOR 2015. Mr. Synan moved to advertise Ordinance No. 922-15, specifying the rate of pension contribution with respect to the police pension fund. Mr. Perry seconded. Mr. Morrison said the rate is 5%, which is the maximum amount and set by Act 600. Upon a roll call vote: Mr. Synan – yes, Mrs. Kearns – yes, Mr. Kepler – yes, Mr. Vance – yes, Mr. Kase – yes, Mr. Perry – yes. Motion approved. car 1/22/15 Regular Voting Meeting – Wednesday, January 21, 2015 13B. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 636-15, DISPOSAL OF RECORDS. Mr. Kepler moved to approve Resolution No. 636-15, disposing of certain records, archives and public documents. Mr. Kase seconded. Upon a roll call vote: Mr. Synan – yes, Mrs. Kearns – yes, Mr. Kepler – yes, Mr. Vance – yes, Mr. Kase – yes, Mr. Perry – yes. Motion approved. 13C. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 637-15, A RESOLUTION ADOPTING WESTMORELAND COUNTY’S HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN. Mr. Kepler moved to approve. Mr. Kase seconded. Mr. Morrison explained that Council adopted the County Plan in 2009, which makes the Municipality eligible for federal funds for clean-up in the event of a hazardous mitigation in the community. The County updated its plan over the past year and the Municipality participated in that process. In order to continue participation by Murrysville, Council needs to adopt the Plan by Resolution. There were no questions from Council. Upon a roll call vote: Mr. Synan – yes, Mrs. Kearns – yes, Mr. Kepler – yes, Mr. Vance – yes, Mr. Kase – yes, Mr. Perry – yes. Motion approved. 13D. CONSIDER MURRYSVILLE POLICE’S PARTICIPATION IN THE “BUCKLE-UP PA” AND “AGGRESSIVE DRIVING PROGRAMS.” Mr. Synan moved to authorize the appropriate Municipal officials to execute an agreement for the Murrysville Police Department’s participation in the PA Aggressive Driving Enforcement and Education programs. Mr. Vance seconded. Mr. Morrison said this is a multi-Municipal program where communities get together, identify specific dates during the year, and set up signs along Rt. 22 alerting drivers that the program is in effect. Last year, through the program, there were 191 total contacts with 193 citations, 2 DUI, 1 drug, and 1 other arrest. There were no questions from Council. Upon a roll call vote: Mr. Synan – yes, Mrs. Kearns – yes, Mr. Kepler – yes, Mr. Vance – yes, Mr. Kase – yes, Mr. Perry – yes. Motion approved. 13E. CONSIDER AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR ANY INTERESTED LOCAL ORGANIZATION WISHING TO ORGANIZE AND SPONSOR AN EVENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE UPCOMING MUNICIPAL PRIMARY ELECTION. Mr. Kase moved to advertise. Mr. Kepler seconded. Upon a roll call vote: Mr. Synan – yes, Mrs. Kearns – yes, Mr. Kepler – yes, Mr. Vance – yes, Mr. Kase – yes, Mr. Perry – yes. Motion approved. car 1/22/15 Regular Voting Meeting – Wednesday, January 21, 2015 13F. CONSIDER APPOINTMENTS TO THE BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES. EAC – two vacancies – no candidates as of 5:00 FTMSA – one vacancy for a five-year term. Mr. Kepler moved to appoint Vince Valeri. All present voted aye. Parks & Recreation – three vacancies – three-year terms. Mr. Kepler nominated Alan Petrazzi, Jackie Stempfer and Jim Boyd. Mrs. Kearns nominated Tom Dittman. Alan Petrazzi: Upon a roll call vote: Mr. Synan – no, Mrs. Kearns – yes, Mr. Kepler – yes, Mr. Vance – yes, Mr. Kase – yes, Mr. Perry – yes. Appointment approved. Jackie Stempfer: Upon a roll call vote: Mr. Synan – no, Mrs. Kearns – yes, Mr. Kepler – yes, Mr. Vance – yes, Mr. Kase – yes, Mr. Perry – yes. Appointment approved. Jim Boyd: Upon a roll call vote: Mr. Synan – yes, Mrs. Kearns – yes, Mr. Kepler – yes, Mr. Vance – yes, Mr. Kase – yes, Mr. Perry – yes. Appointment approved. Since the three vacancies were filled, there was no vote on Mr. Dittman. Personnel – four vacancies – three-year terms, with one vacancy to expire 12/31/15 – there were no nominations Planning – two vacancies – four-year terms. Mr. Perry nominated Jamie Lee; Mr. Synan nominated Bill Yant; Mr. Kepler nominated Charles Beard. Jamie Marie Lee: Upon a roll call vote: Mr. Synan – yes, Mrs. Kearns – yes, Mr. Kepler – yes, Mr. Vance – yes, Mr. Kase – yes, Mr. Perry – yes. Appointment approved. Bill Yant: Upon a roll call vote: Mr. Synan – yes, Mrs. Kearns – yes, Mr. Kepler – no, Mr. Vance – yes, Mr. Kase – no, Mr. Perry – no. Vote split. Charles Beard: Upon a roll call vote: Mr. Synan – no, Mrs. Kearns – no, Mr. Kepler – yes, Mr. Vance – no, Mr. Kase – yes, Mr. Perry – no. Appointment failed. Bill Yant (second vote): Upon a roll call vote: Mr. Synan – yes, Mrs. Kearns – yes, Mr. Kepler – yes, Mr. Vance – yes, Mr. Kase – yes, Mr. Perry – yes. Appointment approved. Traffic Impact – There was one applicant, who was previously appointed to the Planning Commission. UCC – three vacancies ZHB – one vacancy (term expires 12/31/18). Mr. Perry nominated Charles Beard. Cherie Weber will be asked to contact Mr. Beard to ask if he would consider appointment to this Board. Mayor Brooks suggested putting an article in the paper concerning the vacancies, especially the Personnel Board. Mr. Morrison suggested that Council might want to consider changing the number of people required for the Personnel Board car 1/22/15 Regular Voting Meeting – Wednesday, January 21, 2015 13G. CONSIDER COUNCIL LIAISON APPOINTMENTS TO THE BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES. Council President commended the Council members for agreeing to stay in their current positions: Emergency Services – Regis Synan FTMSA – Jeffery Kepler Library/Pension/Finance – William Vance EAC – David Perry Planning – Loren Kase Parks – Joshua Lorenz Personnel – Joan Kearns Mrs. Kearns will also fill in for any Council person who is unable to attend a meeting. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: 14A. CONSIDER S-11-14, STURM SUBDIVISION, MEADOWBROOK ROAD NEAR MCWILLIAMS ROAD INTERSECTION, 2 LOTS. Mr. Synan moved to approve. Mr. Kepler seconded. Municipal Planner Allen Cohen said the only follow-up from the prior meeting was the discussion on the proposed Rails to Trails project. The Applicant met with the various parties involved and decided it was not in the Applicant’s interest to donate a portion of the property for the project. The recommendation of a $1,200 fee-in-lieu donation to Chambers Park upon submission of the building permit application would be applicable, plus any conditions in the memo provided to Council. All other conditions as previously noted (recordation of the plan subject to DEP approval) still apply. Mrs. Kearns asked if the Applicant, Joshua Sturm, is fully aware of all the conditions, specifically the recordation and providing a hydrology study to the Municipality if a private well system to provide water for the lots is to be utilized. Mr. Sturm said it was his understanding that the water test would have to be done in order to get a building permit and asked if that was correct or if the test had to be done in order to get the subdivision passed. Mr. Sturm said he has contacted 4-5 water well drillers over the past several months and hasn’t been able to get a call back from any of them. Public water is available if the water analysis fails, and he is requesting that the testing not be done until a building permit application is submitted. Mr. Morrison said the subdivision requires that the utilities be there; Mr. Cohen said public water is available so the plan can be approved with public water available and a building permit will not be issued until either public water is connected or the hydrology study provided. Mr. Sturm said that would be helpful and that he is only waiting to find a water well driller to do the job. Mr. Perry asked for Mr. Sturm’s contact information and said he will put him in touch with someone who should be able to help him. Mr. Synan moved to amend the motion to change the condition that the hydrology study be provided prior to the building permit issuance. Mr. Kepler seconded. Upon a roll call vote: Mr. Synan – yes, Mrs. Kearns – yes, Mr. Kepler – yes, Mr. Vance – yes, Mr. Kase – yes, Mr. Perry – yes. Amended motion approved. car 1/22/15 Regular Voting Meeting – Wednesday, January 21, 2015 On the main motion, as amended: Upon a roll call vote: Mr. Synan – yes, Mrs. Kearns – yes, Mr. Kepler – yes, Mr. Vance – yes, Mr. Kase – yes, Mr. Perry – yes. Motion approved. ENGINEERING: 15A. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF BOND RELEASE FOR BARRINGTON HEIGHTS. Mr. Kepler moved to reduce the bond amount for the performance bond being held to ensure completion of the required improvements at the Barrington Heights development. The reduction is in the amount of $38,608, which will leave $571,097.14 remaining. Mr. Kase seconded. Upon a roll call vote: Mr. Synan – yes, Mrs. Kearns – yes, Mr. Kepler – yes, Mr. Vance – yes, Mr. Kase – yes, Mr. Perry – yes. Motion approved. OLD BUSINESS: 17A. CONSIDER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENERGY RESOURCE LANGUAGE. Mr. Morrison provided to Council the comments and suggested language received from some of the Council members. Mr. Morrison prefaced the discussion by stating that, from his point of view, the two pertinent items are: (1) the requirements under the Municipal Planning Code (MPC) and (2) the Municipality’s obligation under the Environmental Rights Amendment, as well as the direction to review the language on a regular basis as the legal environment changes moving forward. He continued by saying that he things the environmental rights vision of the Constitution is a moving target; the challenges on any application need to be identified – whether it’s a Marcellus Shale, a subdivision development or a dry cleaning store that would choose to come into the community. All of those uses would have impacts on the environment. Mr. Kepler recommended that Council stay clear of making a legal position in the document. He said that it’s stated in the MCP that the Municipality has to provide for the reasonable ability to acquire energy withdrawal, but questioned that compared to the environmental side, whether the Municipality has the right to ban it completely. He said that’s a debatable issue and a moving target on its own. He said he believes the desire in the Comprehensive Plan is to protect the community within the laws of the Commonwealth. He suggested leaving the language general and let each Council make its interpretation at such time as the Plan needs reviewed. Mr. Morrison said the Municipal Planning Code is law – it’s Act 247 of the Pennsylvania Municipal Statutes. Mr. Kepler asked what takes precedence or what supersedes the other? Mr. Perry said that there is a Supreme Court ruling that says that Marcellus drilling is considered an industrial activity, and it can be debated as to how that case law may turn out in a few years. His preference would be to say that the Municipality allows drilling to occur, if possible, versus reasonable access. Mr. Morrison asked if Mr. Perry’s suggestion is that the first consideration should be environmental rights section and/or then the Planning Code be the second test; he said that’s a dangerous road to go down. Mr. Perry said he still believes it should be “drilling if reasonable” because of the Supreme Court decision and he doesn’t believe a ban would survive; the overruling of Act 13 gives a lot of latitude to Municipalities to look at environmental health and safety. Mr. Morrison said health, safety and car 1/22/15 Regular Voting Meeting – Wednesday, January 21, 2015 welfare is the foundation of a zoning ordinance, so in his mind, the first test is always the obligation the Municipality has under Act 247, which clearly says that the Municipality has to provide for all uses. The environmental side of that test is a moving target; there are environmental impacts at every activity that takes place and it will be the burden of the developer in any case to prove that those impacts are minimized or controlled to the extent that they don’t have a detrimental effect on the community as a result of the development. Mr. Perry said if a setback is put in place, an application can’t be denied; it is extremely difficult to prove ahead of time that there is an adverse impact to someone. He believes it’s better to put protections up front and Council can always back off from them. He said he would rather make it a harder target at first because it gives the most protection. Mr. Kepler said he doesn’t believe the hurdles should be put in the Plan; the vision has always been to protect the community. How that is accomplished is up to each individual Council to discuss. Mr. Perry said that the caveat to that is that Act 13 says that the Comprehensive Plan has to lay out the groundwork to be protected. Municipal Planner Allen Cohen said that he initially advised Council, almost a year ago, why the language in that section of the Comprehensive Plan had to be amended. He said he wanted Council to be aware that there is a responsibility, and there is also a right to the protection of the community. He continued by saying that the real crux of the issue is that the Comprehensive Plan serves as a support for whatever Ordinance is adopted by Council, so when an Ordinance is finally adopted, Council can point to the Plan and say that is what led to the conclusion. He said that the details in the Zoning Ordinance, which are more important than the Comprehensive Plan, are based on recognition that the public’s health, safety and welfare, and environmental rights, are important, while at the same time striking a balance – and zoning is always a balance between rights and responsibilities to provide and protect. Mr. Kepler asked if a statement was put into the Comprehensive Plan that the Municipality recognizes that it must provide the ability to withdraw or strike the gas [ordinance], does that limit future Councils’ ability to say that they are going to ban it entirely? Mr. Cohen said it would. Mr. Perry commented on different interpretations on the word “reasonable.” Mrs. Kearns said you can’t use “wiggle words.” Mr. Cohen said “reasonable” needs to be defined in the Zoning Ordinance and would then be Council’s view of how to implement the Comprehensive Plan and deciding what is reasonable. The Plan provides the framework for Council to make the decision consistent with it. After additional discussion, removing the “wiggle words” and a sentence from Mr. Morrison’s suggested wording, Council agreed on the changes that should be included in the Energy Resources section of the Plan. NEW BUSINESS: Consider resident’s request for a representative to attend the Penn-Township meeting on well drilling. Councilman Perry has agreed to attend. Mr. Morrison brought to Council’s attention that ordinances from another community cannot be enforced by Murrysville. For example, if a well is drilled in Penn Township near the border with Murrysville, and it is within the setbacks prescribed by Penn Township’s ordinance but is too close to a dwelling as outlined in Murrysville’s ordinance, Murrysville’s code enforcement personnel can’t cross car 1/22/15 Regular Voting Meeting – Wednesday, January 21, 2015 boundaries to enforce Murrysville’s setback requirements. Mr. Morrison said that there can be joint zoning, but it is very difficult because it’s not a zoning ordinance that pertains to a particular use; it’s a comprehensive zoning effort that would include a regional group. Mr. Morrison and Michael Hiler demonstrated and explained proposed new audio-visual equipment to be installed in Council Chambers. After the demonstration and discussion, Mr. Morrison said he would like to demonstrate the system to the Planning Commission for input before a final decision is made. EXECUTIVE SESSION: None. ACTION ITEMS: Cherie Weber is to contact Mr. Beard to ask if he will accept an appointment to the Zoning Hearing Board. ADJOURNMENT: Mr. Perry moved to adjourn. Mr. Kase seconded. All present voted aye. Motion approved. The Council Meeting concluded at 9:13 p.m. The Regular Voting Meeting was broadcast on local government Channel 19. A true copy of the Council meeting DVD is available for the public to purchase from the Municipality of Murrysville and is in the Murrysville Public Library for review. car 1/22/15