Development Oversight Committee for TIF District No. 2 Meeting
Regular MeetingNorman, OK · May 7, 2024
Minutes
CITY OF NORMAN, OK
DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE FOR TIF
DISTRICT NO. 2 MEETING
Municipal Building, Executive Conference Room, 201 West Gray, Norman,
OK 73069
Tuesday, May 07, 2024 at 1:30 PM
MINUTES
It is the policy of the City of Norman that no person or groups of persons shall on the grounds of
race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, age, place of birth, sex, sexual orientation, gender
identity or expression, familial status, marital status, including marriage to a person of the same
sex, disability, relation, or genetic information, be excluded from participation in, be denied the
benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in employment activities or in all programs,
services, or activities administered by the City, its recipients, sub-recipients, and contractors. In
the event of any comments, complaints, modifications, accommodations, alternative formats,
and auxiliary aids and services regarding accessibility or inclusion, please contact the ADA
Technician at 405-366-5424, Relay Service: 711. To better serve you, five (5) business days'
advance notice is preferred.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT
Alternate Committee Member Brenda O'Brian
Committee Member Greg Burge
Committee Member William Wilson
Committee Member Rob Norman
ABSENT
Committee Member Kaimee Kellis
Committee Member Kurt Lee
Committee Member Nick Migliorino
OTHERS
Anthony Francisco, Director of Finance/NTIFA Treasurer
Clint Mercer, Chief Accountant
Dannielle Risenhoover, Admin. Tech IV
Sara Kaplan, Business & Community Relations
Kathryn Walker, City Attorney/NTIFA General Counsel
Cynthia Rogers, Citizen
Paul Wilson, Citizen
Andrea Hancock, Norman Transcript
The meeting started at approximately 1:40 PM. Chair Burge declared that there was not a
quorum.
DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE FOR TIF DISTRICT NO. 2 MEETING - Tuesday, May 07, 2024
Page |1
DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED ROCK CREEK ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT TIF
Anthony Francisco presented several documents to the Committee for review. These
documents are input to a proposed Project Plan that is still being finalized; however, staff wanted
the Committee to be aware of their content as soon as possible. Chair Burge opened the floor
for discussion. "What are people's thoughts?" Burge asked. "With the goal being to increase
our thoughts and deepen our understanding of where we are currently, trying to understand
some of the most critical points of discussion at this point of the process, and weigh in with our
own thoughts and ideas."
Member Norman asked, "How, why and when did the additional land (south of Rock Creek)
become added to the (Rock Creek Entertainment District) proposal?"
Kathryn Walker replied, "I think the Increment District has always included the properties
adjacent to Rock Creek in our internal discussions."
Norman stated that he believed the City's thought process after TIF (Tax Increment Financing)
Two was the following: "This was a part of the Increment District that was going to be fully
returned to the City in terms of sales tax, the County in terms of property tax, and now we're
going back in and saying, 'Well, we want to include this in this new TIF.' To me it's a little bit,
kind of, 'double TIF'n' that area. We've already had a TIF that's helped that area along and now
we're wanting to do one again. We can say the same thing north, but I understand the rationale
going north (of Rock Creek). We've got a different ball game going on north. That is a classic
area to me that doesn't really qualify or meet TIF financing. That little area south of Rock Creek,
to me, is an area that, classically, is something that - if it were standing alone, wouldn't qualify
at least under the intent, purpose, and spirit of the Local Development Act for another TIF."
Norman believes this is "a canary in the coal mine" because when he asks himself why the
developers included the land south of Rock Creek, he believes that "they needed it, to make the
deal work".
Norman continued, "You develop those properties south of Rock Creek, you get some good
concepts, you're right by the YFAC (Young Family Athletic Center), you're gonna go great guns,
and it's a great benefit to the City to be able to realize sales tax money and to the County and to
the schools to be able realize ad valorem money. When you've got a 100% TIF that's now
capturing that as well as what's north of Rock Creek, you're kind of taking a promise away that
was made when we did this last Project Plan that we weren't going to take money away from the
City, the County and the schools again where it wasn't needed. It raises concerns to me about
whether the deal is feasible." Norman would like to have this concern addressed by those
creating the Project Plan. He would also like to know what University North Park (UNP), LLC's
intentions are for the land within UNP, south of Rock Creek Road.
The proposed weather museum is not part of the Rock Creek Entertainment project plan or an
approved TIF project for TIF funding; however, tentative plans have it being built within the
increment area.
Member Wilson showed serious concern for only 1200 parking spots being in the development
plans. "They're giving 1200 parking spots, there's 4660 at Lloyd Noble; so, where are the 3500
other cars gonna park at?" Wilson said. "There is a lot of stated interest in having less surface
DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE FOR TIF DISTRICT NO. 2 MEETING - Tuesday, May 07, 2024
Page |2
parking," Anthony Francisco said. "Just as we've had discussion about parking at the YFAC
(Young Family Athletic Center), there's lots of available parking within University North Park and
the idea would be to have some sort of circulating transit system." The transit system that has
been in discussion, could shuttle people from overflow parking areas to the entertainment venue.
Wilson still questioned where within the UNP TIF District would there be 3500 more parking
spots, with or without a shuttle system. "I'd say it's a big issue on this whole arena thing," Wilson
said.
Chair Burge showed concern for the economic studies that were presented to the Committee.
"The only projections made here are under the 100% build out scenario where everything that's
getting claimed, that could come to fruition over the cycle of this proposed TIF, will happen at
their proposed timelines - and that is the only figure. It's literally like pricing to perfection which
is not a standard approach for presenting the results of an economic impact analysis. It's
generally scenario based and is generally more informative," Burge said. "I would like to see
more serious discussions on cannibalization and impact on what economic activity would look
like at Lloyd Noble, current facilities, current revenues, and impacts of any of those losses on
the City's general operating budget." Burge also didn't feel that the net-new jobs, provided within
the proposal, accounted for the jobs being lost at Lloyd Noble.
Burge continued, "Even if you take the 'Hunden' projections and the analysis, keeping in mind
that they're analyzing the best case scenario, the rate of return on this investment under their
projection comes out to less than 1% a year (for the 25 year commitment). We could get four or
five times that by just investing in bonds."
Member Norman commented on the tax revenues initiated by the proposed TIF District. "We're
not plowing any of it (tax dollars) back into the General Fund until that arena is paid off and the
$40 million in infrastructure project TIF are fully funded and done. That brings up the concern
to me that we're moving around, we're diverting stuff from other places in Norman and other
places in the County, ok; but, from the City's point of view, are we diverting to achieve something
that's still going to go into our General Fund and Capital Fund? Then you've gotta ask, what
impact is that going to have on the General Fund and the Capital Fund if 86% of the activity or
83% of the activity depending on if it's ad valorem or city sales tax is coming from somewhere
else in the district? What impact does that have on the other taxing districts? It would seem like
the City, if they're investing this much, should get the benefit of some of that return on that
growth, whether it be diverted from another part of the district or whether it be net new," Norman
said. "I'm not seeing that right now with a 100% incremented TIF."
Chair Burge believes that a reasonable discussion of alternative scenarios is needed and was
interested in how shifting events from the Lloyd Noble facility to the Rock Creek Entertainment
arena might impact the City's general revenue. Several Committee Members stated that they
believe the land south of Lloyd Noble would make a good place for an event center and that the
option should be considered. "There's a lot of students that walk to events down there (Lloyd
Noble). If they build the arena up here (Rock Creek Entertainment District), they (students) gotta
all come up here - the ones that do walk in," Member Wilson said.
If approved, this sales tax increment would not capture the Norman Forward Tax, Public Safety
Sales Tax, or Transit Tax. It would capture the 3%, core, sales tax.
According to Kathryn Walker, City Council is expecting a Rock Creek Entertainment District
TIF recommendation from the Development Oversight Committee for TIF District 2.
DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE FOR TIF DISTRICT NO. 2 MEETING - Tuesday, May 07, 2024
Page |3
The Committee agreed that they would meet for their regularly scheduled meeting on May 21 if
the Project Plan was available for their review, otherwise they'd postpone their meeting time for
when the Project Plan was available.
Items submitted for the record:
Hunden Partners. (2024). Market Demand, Financial Feasibility & Impact Study
Sappleton, A. & Chiappe, J. (2024). Economic Impact of Norman TIF District. Oklahoma
Department of Commerce
University North Park Entertainment District (2024, April 25).
Tax Increment Finance Districts (2024, April 25).
Rogers, C. (2024). Analysis of Studies and Projections: UNP TIF 4
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting ended at approximately 2:45 PM.
DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE FOR TIF DISTRICT NO. 2 MEETING - Tuesday, May 07, 2024
Page |4
Agenda
CITY OF NORMAN, OK
DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE FOR TIF
DISTRICT NO. 2 MEETING
Municipal Building, Executive Conference Room, 201 West Gray, Norman,
OK 73069
Tuesday, May 07, 2024 at 1:30 PM
AGENDA
It is the policy of the City of Norman that no person or groups of persons shall on the grounds
of race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, age, place of birth, sex, sexual orientation,
gender identity or expression, familial status, marital status, including marriage to a person of
the same sex, disability, relation, or genetic information, be excluded from participation in, be
denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in employment activities or in
all programs, services, or activities administered by the City, its recipients, sub-recipients, and
contractors. In the event of any comments, complaints, modifications, accommodations,
alternative formats, and auxiliary aids and services regarding accessibility or inclusion, please
contact the ADA Technician at 405-366-5424, Relay Service: 711. To better serve you, five (5)
business days' advance notice is preferred.
ROLL CALL
DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED ROCK CREEK ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT TIF
ADJOURNMENT
DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE FOR TIF DISTRICT NO. 2 MEETING - Tuesday, May 07, 2024
Page |1
Get email alerts for Norman
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.