Inland Wetlands, Water Courses & Conservation Commission
Regular MeetingNorwich, CT · December 6, 2018
Minutes
Regular Meeting Minutes
December 6, 2018
CITY OF NORWICH
INLAND WETLANDS, WATERCOURSES AND CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Lower-level Conference Room
23 Union Street, Norwich, Connecticut
A. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Richard Morell called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
B. ROLL CALL and SEATING of ALTERNATES:
Present: Richard Morell, Chairman
Douglas Lee, Vice Chairman
David Poore
Peter Chalecki
Robert McCoy, Alternate
Absent: Brandon Hyde
Art Sharron
Michael Lahan, Alternate
Also Present: Deanna Rhodes, IWWCC Agent and Katherine Rose, Recording Secretary
C. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES:
A motion was made by Douglas Lee to APPROVE the November 1, 2018 minutes. Peter Chalecki
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
D. COMMUNICATIONS:
Deanna Rhodes shared the newest copy of the Connecticut Wildlife magazine but otherwise had
no communications.
E. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None
F. OLD BUSINESS: IWWCC #18-12: 140 Yantic Road. Proposed land disturbance activities associated
with redevelopment of the existing Hall Mill building into hotel use. Associated site
improvements include grading, drainage, parking, sidewalks, landscaping within the upland
review area and wetlands. Application and Property of Mill Development CT, LLC. Assessor’s
Map 49, Block 1, Lot 45
Deanna Rhodes introduced Brandon Handfield as the property owner’s consultant. Brandon
Handfield stated he was from Yantic River Consultants and representing the applicant Mill
Development CT, LLC. Brandon introduced various site plans including aerials, the existing site and
the proposed site. Mr. Handfield reported the existing site is 5.05 acres, the zone is located in the
Production, Manufacturing and Research zoning district and it is listed on the National Registry of
Historic Places. Mr. Handfield also went into the site history in regards to the wetlands and the
flooding of its historic headrace. Brandon Handfield stated the application wishes to connect the
existing structures into one building but otherwise the site’s footprint will be very similar
notwithstanding the small portico addition for the hotel lobby. Mr. Handfield went into detail on
how the site is situated within a flood plain and the drastic changes between the current site and
the previous functioning mill. Mr. Handfield explained that historically the head race was
intentionally flooded for mill functions but currently it is primarily vegetation with no flooded water
and that any water in the headrace area is discharge from the Route 2/Route 32 intersection. Mr.
Handfield described the future layout functions of the site including how the building will remain a
historic structure when converted to a 151 room hotel with a restaurant and other personal
services for guests. Mr. Handfield demonstrated where the parking lots would be located and
stated that beneath the rear lots would be treatment trench filtration systems to bring storm water
to the wetland area. Mr. Handfield clarified a Riprap splash pad would be installed to dissipate the
energy of the water prior to arriving at the wetlands which decreases the chance of erosion. Mr.
Handfield stated there would be a slight wetlands impact by installation of silt fence along the
delineated wetlands during the retaining wall installation. Mr. Handfield summarized there would
be 30 square feet of permanent and 500 square feet of temporary disturbance to the wetland area.
David Poore questioned if the wetland area was originally a tributary or something else of that
nature. Brandon Handfield responded that it was a manmade diversion created when Route 2 was
created and that the area adds little value, but it does contain wetland soils; even though it is a
manmade wetland.
Douglas Lee asked if engineers would be gathering detailed elevations in regards to the headrace
and outflow into the Yantic River to determine how high the Yantic River would need to flood for
water to fill the headrace. Brandon Handfield said that is something that will be done but, based on
the elevation data they do have, the river would have to be at least 10 feet higher than typical. Mr.
Handfield said that while they are in a floodplain, the risk is minimum, but any flooding that would
occur would affect their site.
Robert McCoy questioned if most flooded water wouldn’t end up in the Yantic Fire Department
Field and Brandon Handfield responded that was correct.
Peter Chalecki asked how much water is flowing underneath the site. Brandon Handfield
responded that he was not positive as it would require an in depth study due to the majority of the
water coming from the highway. Peter Chalecki questioned if the existing culvert does in fact
connect to the Yantic River on the opposite side. Brandon Handfield stated he was not positive but
the proposed drainage pipe would be several feet higher than the current water level so water
would have to be significantly higher than it has historically been in order to cause flooding. Mr.
Handfield explained that the proposed retaining wall and parking lot design are made to handle
flooding situations.
Richard Morrell asked the size of the existing tail race. Brandon Handfield said he would have to
estimate that it is 10-12 feet wide by 5-6 feet tall and appears to be the same size the entire way
down. Mr. Handfield said while he has only been able to see the tail race from the top, the
applicant is working with an experience group that has completed a previous mill restoration that
included a tail race.
Brandon Handfield went into more detail regarding the storm water and parking lot filtration
system explaining there are underground plastic arches that are designed for water detention. Mr.
Handfield explained the water would fall into catch basins and then pass through a manifold that
2
utilizes geotextile fabric as the main layer of filtration which has been designed to treat an excess
of their minimum calculations. Brandon said the current maintenance schedule is set for every six
months for the first year and then once a year. Douglas Lee asked Deanna Rhodes if there were
currently any stipulations regarding a maintenance schedule in the current recommendations
which she stated no, but it should be added.
Richard Morrell asked if there were any plans in place for removing debris. Mr. Handfield stated
the applicant didn’t propose anything in their application as there isn’t any existing debris in the
wetlands, just invasive vegetation which he agreed the removal of would greatly beautify the area.
Deanna Rhodes asked Brandon to discuss the soils in the wetland area. Brandon Handfield stated
as it is not a naturally occurring floodplain. John Iani didn’t highlight anything in his report and just
stated that the only permanent impact to the area would be the one treatment discharge pipe.
Deanna Rhoades introduced a memo provided to the committee members in regards to responses
Brandon Handfield provided to comments left by the City Engineer who has not had the chance to
respond to them yet. Deanna Rhodes also pointed out the comments by the sanitarian for the
Uncas Health District with regards to abandoning the well on site and for the applicant to work
with the health department in regards to the proposed pool and hotel salon. Mrs. Rhodes indicated
that she notified the neighboring Town of Franklin as required. She has yet to receive any
response.
All members were in agreement than they had discussed any concerns and had no further
comments.
Douglas Lee made a motion that a public hearing was not necessary for Application IWWCC #18-12
finding that it is not in the public interest to hold one and that the proposal did not include
significant activities. Robert McCoy seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Deanna Rhodes then read into the record a list of recommended conditions that were in her
application review memo.
Douglas Lee made a Motion to Approve the application with the stated conditions, as read by the
planner, including two additional conditions:
● That the approval is valid for FIVE YEARS and will expire on 12/06/2023.
● That the $17,565 bond for Erosion and Sediment Control, in an amount determined to be
sufficient by the City Engineer, be submitted in the form of a check or letter of credit prior to
filing of the mylars for the project.
● That the IWWCC letter of approval be placed on the cover sheet of the plan set.
● That loose debris located on the site be removed prior to initiating any land disturbance
activities to avoid being deposited into the nearby wetlands.
● That all site activities shall be conducted in accordance with the plans, specifications and
documents of record. Any deviation from the approved plans or construction sequence shall
be cause for enforcement action by the Inland Wetlands, Watercourses and Conservation
Commission.
3
● That the permittee shall notify the Inland Wetlands Agent prior to the commencement of
work and upon its completion.
● That all work and all regulated activities conducted pursuant to this authorization shall be
consistent with the terms and conditions of this approval. Any structures, excavation, fill,
obstructions, encroachments or regulated activities not specifically identified and authorized
herein shall constitute a violation of this approval and may result in its modification,
suspension, or revocation. Upon initiation of the activities authorized herein, the permittee
thereby accepts and agrees to comply with the terms and conditions of this approval.
● That no equipment or materials including without limitation fill, construction materials, or
debris, shall be deposited, placed, or stored in any wetland or watercourse on or off site
unless specifically authorized by this approval.
● That the General Provisions stated in Section 11.9 of the Inland Wetlands and Watercourse
Regulations are applicable to this permit.
● That the permit shall not be assigned or transferred to another entity without the written
permission of the Commission.
● That all erosion and sediment control measures shall be in accordance with the Connecticut
Guidelines for Erosion and Sediment Control. Erosion and sediment control measures shall
be installed and inspected prior to site disturbance. It is the permittee's responsibility to
schedule the inspection with the Norwich Planning Department. Additional erosion and
sediment control measures shall be installed if determined to be necessary by the
Designated Agent. The permittee shall take such necessary steps consistent with the terms
and conditions of the approval, to control stormwater discharges and to prevent erosion and
sedimentation and to otherwise prevent pollution of wetlands and watercourses.
● That this permit will be strictly enforced. The Commission may suspend or revoke this
permit, may direct the Commission's Agent to issue a cease and desist order or may require
the applicant to modify, extend, or revise the site work or restore the area to its original
condition if it finds that the applicant has not complied with the conditions set forth in this
approval or if the applicant exceeds the scope of this approval as set forth herein or if the
intended use or actual use of the general site is not as represented by the application or the
plan of record.
● That the applicant establish an invasive species management plan to address the issue within
the upland review area.
● That the applicant prepares a form for approval by the City to be used for reporting
upcoming and follow-up routine maintenance of the drainage system.
The reasons stated for the approval was that the applicant has shown they have adequately
addressed the inland and wetland regulations and concerns. David Poore seconded. The motion
passed unanimously.
G. NEW BUSINESS: Receipt of Any New Applications:
a. IWWCC #18-13: 17-35 Falls Avenue. Thayer’s Marina is requesting a special permit as they
removed and enlarged an area of their property that was not approved by the Commission and
went noticed by FEMA.
4
David Poore made a motion to receive the application and table it until the following meeting.
Douglas Lee seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
H. OTHER BUSINESS:
1. Staff Report: Update on Plan of Conservation and Development Implementation Committee
Deanna Rhodes informed the Commission that the committee is moving along with hour-long
meetings and the next meeting is planned for January 9, 2019. She shared that they are currently
discussing the section on economic development. She invited the Commission to attend the
meetings which occur every other month. Deanna Rhodes stated that the Plan expires in 2023 but
they will probably need to start preparation of the next document in 2020.
2. Upland Review Permits Issued. There were no agent approvals granted since last month.
Deanna Rhodes shared that she has issued no permits since the Commission last met.
I. ADJOURNMENT:
A motion was made by Richard Morrell to adjourn the meeting at 7:55 p.m. Seconded by Peter
Chalecki. Motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Katherine Rose, Recording Secretary
5
Agenda
REGULAR MEETING
INLAND WETLANDS, WATERCOURSES & CONSERVATION COMMISSION
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2018 - 7:00 P.M.
23 UNION STREET NORWICH CONNECTICUT
LOWER LEVEL CONFERENCE ROOM
AGENDA
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. ROLL CALL and SEATING of ALTERNATES
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 1, 2018
D. COMMUNICATIONS:
E. PUBLIC HEARING(S): None
F. OLD BUSINESS:
1. IWWCC #18-12: 140 Yantic Road. Proposed land disturbance activities associated with
redevelopment of the existing Hall Mill building into a 151 room hotel. Associated site
improvements within the upland review area and wetlands include proposed grading,
drainage, utilities, parking lot, sidewalks, landscaping, tennis court, and playground.
Application and Property of Mill Development CT, LLC. Assessor’s Map 49, Block 1, Lot 45
G. NEW BUSINESS:
1. Receipt of Any New Applications
H. OTHER BUSINESS:
1. Staff Report: POCD Implementation Committee Reminder
2. Upland Review Permits Issued
3. Miscellaneous
J. ADJOURNMENT
Copies: P&NS wall, City Clerk’s Office, Board Clerk, IWWCC Members, Applicant(s)
Get email alerts for Norwich
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.