Rehabilitation Review Committee
Regular MeetingNorwich, CT · March 10, 2010
Minutes
MINUTES OF THE REHAB REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
MARCH 10, 2010
8:45 AM
Members Present: Chairman Rodney Bowie, Alderman Tucker Braddock, Joe East,
Jim Troeger, Jim Roberts, Kevin Lin, and Susan Goldman
Others Present: Karen Resch, MetLife Home Loans; Denise Blake, Wayne Sharkey,
and Linda Lee Smith
Chairman Rodney Bowie called the meeting to order at 8:48 AM.
Motion was made by Tucker Braddock and seconded by Jim Roberts to accept
the minutes of the February 17, 2009 meeting. The motion carried unanimously.
New Business
At the last meeting the committee wanted more discussion on reverse mortgages.
Karen Resch of MetLife Home Loans came to talk to the committee on reverse
mortgages.
Susan Goldman gave a brief synopsis on what the rehab/lead program entails. Recently
several elderly homeowners either have reverse mortgages or want to take out a
reverse mortgage in the future, and this committee is not sure how it affects the CD’s
standings.
Karen Resch handed out brochures and gave a brief overview to the committee
members on the benefits of reverse mortgages. She said it allows a person to stay in
their own home, take out the equity and receive proceeds to pay for their needs with no
repayment necessary until they no longer live in their home. It’s a government insured
loan program; the loan is not due and payable until the last occupant no longer resides
in the home. The owner retains full title and full ownership. Credit scores and income
are not considered, proceeds are tax-free and not considered income, and if there is a
deficit it is forgiven.
An appraisal is done and HUD notes certain code items if it’s not insurable. These code
issues will need to be addressed by a licensed contractor. The borrower can get into
the reverse mortgage program, have the items fixed, and that amount will be held in an
escrow account for 9 months for completion of those items.
Ms. Resch told the committee that the City’s mortgage would be in third place because
of FHA, so you can’t have another mortgage, and many lenders do not want to
subordinate.
Wayne Sharkey said that the Community Development’s function is to bring the house
up to code with respect to rehab and lead safety. The CD office needs to determine
how they can process potential applications if the work has already been done through
the reverse mortgage to bring the house up to code compliant levels. The City’s rehab
1
program would be a duplicate program. A lien can’t be attached to the property
because the City would be in third place. One consideration may be a payment plan but
you can’t put a mortgage on the house. This committee is also concerned with
declining equity and where in this program the City would stand any chance of
recouping its money.
Mr. Sharkey stated that the City’s Rehab/Lead Programs were designed for people that
had no other options. If the reverse mortgage is in play, it seems they have another
option. This is like a duplicate program.
Wayne Sharkey explained to Karen Resch that senior loans are presently at 0% loan up
to $30,000 for code correction and then lien is placed on the property for 30 years or
sale or transfer of the property. The question is how to work it with reverse mortgages.
After the original code correction has been done with a reverse mortgage, it is not
monitored again for the next 30 years. So there are some questions if CD can provide
loans for seniors with reverse mortgages; another option might be to do an elderly
furnace repair/replacement program, or simply a grant program with no payback.
Ms. Resch will speak with her account rep and ask how this could be worded with the
City’s rehab programs to be acceptable. Ms. Resch will get back to the committee.
Tucker Braddock asked for suspension of the rules and Jim Roberts seconded it.
All were in favor.
Wayne Sharkey explained to the committee that Denise Blake had a great idea to get
rehab and lead information to the local schools. The Haitian and Spanish outreach
workers have been doing a good job bringing in applications. They are seeing a lot of
applications with delinquent mortgages. At the next meeting there needs to be more
discussion on applications with delinquent mortgages. The mortgage has to be current,
but nothing is written in the Policies and Procedures regarding that. When reviewing
new applicants, they need to be current at the time of application and when projects are
ready to go out to bid. This topic is tabled until the next meeting.
Old Business
Motion was made by Tucker Braddock, seconded by Rodney Bowie to use age 62
as the criteria in the future for the elderly status, which was previously, age 65.
Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Sharkey said that he didn’t have the language detailing the acceptance/denial on
properties with reverse mortgages. This topic is to be put off until Karen Resch from
MetLife has more information for the committee, at which time the committee will make
a decision.
New Applications
Mr. Sharkey told the committee that there were quite a few new property applications to
be approved for the Lead and Rehab Programs. They all meet the eligibility
2
requirements, including eligibility funding for lead and rehab and paid taxes.
Motion was made by Rodney Bowie and seconded by Joe East to approve the list
of new applications. Motion carried unanimously.
Max. Rehab Max. Lead
RLP0910 Owner/Occupied 1 unit $30,000 $13,000
RLP0911 Owner/Occupied 1 unit $30,000 $13,000
RLP0912 Owner/Occupied 1 unit $30,000 $13,000
LP0913 Investor 3 units $39,000
RLP0914 Owner/Occupied 1 unit $30,000 $13,000
RLP0915 Owner/Occupied 1 unit $30,000 $13,000
RLP0916 Owner/Occupied 1 unit $30,000 $13,000
LP0917 Owner/Occupied 1 unit $13,000
Rehab application #09-16 which has negative equity and therefore does not meet the
program requirements. Recommendation is for denial.
Jim Troeger made a motion to deny Application #09-16 for rehab because it has
negative equity and Rodney Bowie seconded the motion. The motion carried
unanimously.
Joe East made a motion to adjourn and Rodney Bowie seconded the motion. The
motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 10:09 AM.
3
Get email alerts for Norwich
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.