City Council Workshop
Regular MeetingOakdale, MN · January 7, 2021
Minutes
WORKSHOP
OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL
January 7, 2021
The City Council held a special workshop on Thursday, January 7, 2021, at Oakdale City Hall, 1584
Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota. The meeting began at 5:06 PM.
Present: Mayor Paul Reinke
Council Members: Jake Ingebrigtson (arrived at 5:04 PM)
Susan Olson
Colleen Swedberg
Kevin Zabel
Also Present: Christina Volkers, City Administrator
Jim Thomson, City Attorney
Susan Barry, City Clerk
Alyssa MacLeod, Communications Specialist (participated virtually)
Bob Streetar, Community Development Director
Jenny Bolton. Kennedy and Graven
Tax Increment Financing 101
Jenny Bolton, Kennedy and Graven, provided a comprehensive review of tax increment financing (TIF),
which serves as an important development tool.
The City Council inquired about TIF options (pay as you go or city provides funding to developer), length
of TIF districts, and the “but-for” application.
Ms. Bolton reviewed eligible and prohibited use of TIF and indicated that developers typically use TIF to
finance demolition and/or relocation and for acquisition, grading, and site improvements; as well as to
redevelop blighted property or create affordable housing. She added that cities typically use TIF for
public infrastructure costs.
In response to questions about affordable housing, Ms. Bolton explained that units typically fill up
quickly and the developer can negotiate increasing the number of affordable units. She also explained
that when income levels of tenants increase, they may remain.
Ms. Bolton provided an overview on establishing a TIF district.
In response to questions, she explained that limitations may be placed such as the duration of the
district and that city policy typically dictates the amount of TIF the city will provide. She also explained
that the city does not lose the ability to negotiate improvements and/or amenities in a project when TIF
is used.
Housing Project Initiatives
The City Council discussed a proposal by Presbyterian Homes to include an affordable housing
component in the 4th and Helmo development.
WORKSHOP
January 7, 2021
Page Two
Council Member Zabel did not support the use of tax increment financing at this location as he believes
it places a burden on all taxpayers.
Council Member Ingebrigtson supports affordable housing but not the use of tax increment financing at
the 4th and Helmo location.
Mayor Reinke supported using tax increment financing for Presbyterian Homes proposed affordable
housing project and noted that affordable housing is a goal of the city’s approved Comprehensive Plan
and this project meets the intent of that plan.
In response to a question from Council Member Zabel on Presbyterian Homes using conduit bonding,
Ms. Bolton explained that the city would need to apply for conduit bonding, which would be tax exempt;
however, it is a highly competitive application process, with limited available funding.
Mayor Reinke indicated that offering affordable housing serves an important public purpose.
Council Member Zabel noted that most residents would not be amenable to paying more taxes to have
more affordable housing.
Council Member Swedberg did not support the use of tax increment financing at the 4th and Helmo
location and asked that other financing options be considered.
In response to a question from Council Member Olson, Community Development Director Streetar
commented on the significant need in the community and metro area for affordable housing. He further
commented on how affordable housing assists businesses in recruiting employees.
Council Member Olson shared her support for affordable housing provided it did not place a burden on
others through the use of tax increment financing.
Community Development Director Streetar stated that Presbyterian Homes would not develop in
Oakdale without the use of tax increment financing.
Mayor Reinke reiterated his support for affordable housing in the city.
City Administrator Volkers informed the City Council that Presbyterian Homes and Bethesda Lutheran
Communities would meet with the City Council on January 12 to discuss their respective projects.
Council Member Zabel stated that he would recuse himself from the Bethesda discussion due to a
conflict of interest.
Adjournment
The workshop adjourned at 6:56 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Susan Barry, City Clerk
Agenda
AGENDA
Special City Council Workshop
The January 7 City Council special workshop and special meeting will be held via Zoom. Zoom is an online platform
that allows persons to “attend” the meeting via video or telephone.
View Special Workshop at: https://zoom.us/j/96501750899?pwd=ODZEY1BZMkJ1bHZ4VFl3QzBCQmdwdz09
from a PC, Mac, tablet, iPhone, or Android device.
Or listen to the discussion by phone by calling 1-301-715-8592 and entering Meeting ID: 965 0175 0899 and
Passcode: 061083, when prompted.
While the workshop is available for public viewing, public comment will not be taken during the meeting.
Thursday, January 7, 2021
Council Chambers
5:30 PM Call to Order
Tax Increment Financing 101
Housing Project Incentives Discussion
Adjournment
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To Mayor and City Council
Through Christina Volkers, City Administrator
Date January 7 2021
Subject Tax Increment Financing 101
At the January 7 special workshop, the City Attorney’s Office will provide a comprehensive review on Tax
Increment Financing (TIF) and facilitate an education session on TIF as an incentive for development.
Baker Tilly staff, as our financial consultant, will also be available to respond to questions along with city
staff.
Overview of
Tax Increment Financing
in Minnesota
City of Oakdale
2021
Tax Increment Financing
Background
• Development finance tool
• A method of capturing tax base growth resulting
from new development
• Use is governed by the “TIF Act”
(MN Statutes, Sections 469.174-469.1794)
• Available to cities, counties and development
authorities
• Annual compliance reporting to State Auditors
Office
• The TIF Act is amended often by the Legislature
Tax Increment Financing Concept
• Captures the local property taxes on the
“increased” value resulting from
development within a specific geographic
area (the “TIF district”)
• Fixed term for capture, then new
development capacity is added to existing
tax base
The Concept of Tax Increment
Financing
A Simple Example
A. Property taxes on $1.0M of
Property is estimated market value (EMV) are
valued at distributed to all applicable taxing
$4.0M jurisdictions.
B. Property taxes on the first $1.0M of
EMV continue to be distributed to
C all applicable taxing jurisdictions.
Property is D C. Local property taxes on the $3.0M
valued at of “Incremental” EMV are
$1.0M distributed to the TIF Authority
These taxes are referred to as “tax
increment.”
D. Property taxes on $4.0M of EMV
A B are distributed to all applicable
taxing jurisdictions.
Prior to After After TIF
Redevelopment Redevelopment District is
(During the life Terminated
of the TIF (Decertified)
District)
Fundamentals
• Six (6) different types of TIF districts
• Each type - different purpose & qualification
requirements
• Maximum duration of TIF district varies by type
• TIF district must be located within an underlying
geographic area known as a “project” (redevelopment
project, economic dev. district, city dev. district, other)
• Development must meet the “but-for” test
• County and school district have no veto powers
• Tax increment must be spent on “TIF eligible” costs
General Guidelines for Eligible
Expenditures
• Generally eligible expenditures relate to activities
needed to prepare land for development and
redevelopment
• Purpose is to finance the “public cost” of
re/development of the project area which includes
preparing the way for private development
• “Ground level and below” rule of thumb
• Building costs only for income qualified housing,
rehabilitation costs, certain publicly owned facilities
Typical “TIF Eligible” Costs
• Land/building acquisition or write-down
• Relocation
• Demolition
• Environmental/geotechnical/Soil Correction
• Public improvements (utilities, roads, sidewalks, etc.)
• Selected site improvements and Preparation (clearance, earthwork,
etc.)
• Building rehabilitation / historic preservation
• Low/moderate income housing (in some cases)
• Parking facilities (lots and ramps)
• Administrative costs
• Paying debt (principal & interest) for any of the above
Prohibited Costs
• Public buildings such as a City Hall, Public
Safety, and Public Works buildings
• Parks and social and recreational facilities
such as community centers, golf courses, etc.
• Administration beyond 10% of TIF collections
Fundamentals of Tax Increment Financing
Project Area (Development District)
– Where TIF dollars can be spent, with limitations
TIF District (Specific Development)
- TIF Plan
- Budget
- Geographic boundaries TIF District 1
- Purpose
- Public Hearing
TIF District 3 TIF District 2
- Certification
Project Area/
Development
District
Where Can Tax Increment Be Spent?
• Older TIF districts (established prior to May 1, 1990):
– 100% of Increments spent within the “project”
– Projects often much larger than TIF districts
– No minimum % must be spent “within” TIF district
– Often multiple TIF districts within a project
• Newer TIF districts (established on or after May 1,
1990):
– 100% of Increments spent within the “project”
– 75%-80% of Increments must be spent within “TIF district”
– Exception: up to 35% of TI may be spent for qualified low
income housing anywhere within the city
– Projects often the same size as the TIF district
Types of TIF Districts & Max. Duration
Type of TIF District Years
1) Redevelopment 26
2) Low/Moderate Housing 26
3) Economic Development 9
4) Soils Condition 21
5) Renewal & Renovation 16
Redevelopment
• Parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district
are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or
gravel parking lots, or other similar structures and more
than 50 percent of the buildings, not including
outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree
requiring substantial renovation or clearance;
• Also rail yards; tank facilities; qualifying disaster areas
• 90% must be used to correct conditions justifying the TIF
District
• 25% (less administrative costs) can be used outside TIF
District
Housing
• a project, or a portion of a project, intended for occupancy, in
part, by persons or families of low and moderate income, as
defined in chapter 462A, Title II of the National Housing Act of
1934, the National Housing Act of 1959, the United States
Housing Act of 1937, as amended, Title V of the Housing Act
of 1949, as amended…
• Income Limits:
• • 20@50 test: 20 percent of units are occupied by individual
whose income are 50% or less of the area median income, or
• • 40@60 test: 40 percent of units are occupied by individual
whose income are 60% or less of the area median income.
• Can be used outside TIF District but only for qualified housing
Economic Development
• (1) it will discourage commerce, industry, or manufacturing from moving their
operations to another state or municipality;
• (2) it will result in increased employment in the state;
• (3) it will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the state; or
• 85% of the buildings and facilities (determined on the basis of square footage)
receiving TIF must be used for:
– (1) the manufacturing or production of tangible personal property, including
processing resulting in the change in condition of the property;
– (2) warehousing, storage, and distribution of tangible personal property,
excluding retail sales;
– (3) research and development related to the activities listed in clause (1) or
(2);
– (4) telemarketing if that activity is the exclusive use of the property;
– (5) tourism facilities;
– (6) space necessary for and related to the activities listed in clauses (1) to (5).
• 20% (less administrative costs) can be used outside TIF District
Soils Conditions
• (a) "Soils condition district" means a type of tax increment financing district
consisting of a project, or portions of a project, within which the authority finds by
resolution that the following conditions exist:
– (1) the presence of hazardous substances, pollution, or contaminants requires
removal or remedial action for use;
– (2) the estimated cost of the proposed removal and remedial action exceeds
the fair market value of the land before completion of the preparation.
– The requirements of clause (2) need not be satisfied, if each parcel of property
in the district either satisfies the requirements of clause (2) or the estimated
costs of the proposed removal or remedial action exceeds $2 per square foot
for the area of the parcel.
• (b) The proposed removal or remediation action must be specified in a
development action response plan to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (a).
• Revenue derived from tax increment from a soils condition district may be used
only to (1) acquire parcels on which the improvements described in clause (2) will
occur; (2) pay for the cost of removal or remedial action; and (3) pay for the
administrative expenses of the authority allocable to the district, including the cost
of preparation of the development action response plan.
• 20% (less administrative costs) can be used outside TIF District
Renewal & Renovation
• (1) parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district
are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel
parking lots, or other similar structures;
• (2) 20 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard;
• (3) 30 percent of the other buildings require substantial
renovation or clearance to remove existing conditions such as:
inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use
relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive
dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for
improvement or conversion, or other identified hazards to the
health, safety, and general well-being of the community; and
• Maximum Duration: 15 years
• 20% (less administrative costs) can be used outside TIF District
Establishing a TIF District
• Process dictated by the TIF Act
• Notice to County Commissioner 30 days before publication
• Notice to county and school district 30 days before hearing
• Notice of public hearing published (10-30 days before)
• Review of project for conformity with comprehensive plan
by City Planning Commission (in some cases)
• Public hearing conducted by City Council
• Approval by City Council (& EDA Board, if applicable)
• TIF district certification request to County
• Filing requirements with the MN Department of Revenue
and Office of State Auditor
Financial Review Process
• Conducted by TIF Consultant
• Financial feasibility
• Debt coverage
• Return on equity
• Extraordinary costs
• Public purpose benefits
• Public versus private financing
• Type of assistance
• Upfront
• PayGO
Assessment of Need for Public Financing
Assistance
• Determine need for and amount of public assistance
• Financing of public improvements that could not be
supported by developer alone without assistance
• Financing of eligible private improvements not
supported by development investment returns
• Verification of developer assumptions
• Matching funding sources with project costs
• Development would not occur ‘but-for’ assistance
Due Diligence for Needs
Assessment
• Review sources and uses of funds
• Sources include
– Debt
– Equity
– TIF
• Uses
– Acquisition, construction, demolition, site work, public
improvements, soft costs including financing, reserves,
developer fee, contingency and other
“But For” Analysis
• Evaluate cash flow (operating proforma)
– Test assumptions against comparables
• Perform analysis to understand what is driving gap
• Expenses:
– Project cost estimates
– Operating expenditures
• Revenues:
– Lease rates for residential (affordable vs market rate) and
commercial
– vacancy rates
– Other financial public assistance
Public Purpose Considerations
• Achieving high quality redevelopment and private investment
on sites which would not be (re)developed otherwise
• Removing slum/blight and/or rehabilitate a high priority site
• Offsetting increased costs of infill development (demo, site
remediation) above costs normally incurred in “greenfield”
development
• Construction of affordable, workforce housing
• Enhancing and diversifying City’s economic base
• Retaining and increasing City tax base
• Retaining and/or increasing number and/or diversity of jobs
that offer stable employment and/or attractive wages and
benefits
• Facilitate infrastructure improvements
• Coordinate new developments with City planning
Financing Alternatives
• Pay-as-you-go note is issued to the developer
– Developer funds the assistance and is repaid over time
– Advantage: Risk is with developer
– Disadvantage: Might have higher interest rates and
developer needs another funding source during
construction
• Bonds are issued by the City or Authority
– General obligation (G.O.) or revenue debt
– Advantage: Typically lower interest rate
– Disadvantage: Risk is with City or Authority
• Interfund loan: City provides up front money to the developer
from funds on hand and repays itself with tax increment
• Land Write-down
• Hybrid
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To Mayor and City Council
Through Christina Volkers, City Administrator
Date January 7 2021
Subject Housing Project Incentives Discussion
At the January 7 special workshop, the City Council will have a discussion on housing project incentives
for development projects.
Get email alerts for Oakdale
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.