Muyni
← Back to Oakdale

City Council Workshop

Regular Meeting

Oakdale, MN · January 7, 2021

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

WORKSHOP OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL January 7, 2021 The City Council held a special workshop on Thursday, January 7, 2021, at Oakdale City Hall, 1584 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota. The meeting began at 5:06 PM. Present: Mayor Paul Reinke Council Members: Jake Ingebrigtson (arrived at 5:04 PM) Susan Olson Colleen Swedberg Kevin Zabel Also Present: Christina Volkers, City Administrator Jim Thomson, City Attorney Susan Barry, City Clerk Alyssa MacLeod, Communications Specialist (participated virtually) Bob Streetar, Community Development Director Jenny Bolton. Kennedy and Graven Tax Increment Financing 101 Jenny Bolton, Kennedy and Graven, provided a comprehensive review of tax increment financing (TIF), which serves as an important development tool. The City Council inquired about TIF options (pay as you go or city provides funding to developer), length of TIF districts, and the “but-for” application. Ms. Bolton reviewed eligible and prohibited use of TIF and indicated that developers typically use TIF to finance demolition and/or relocation and for acquisition, grading, and site improvements; as well as to redevelop blighted property or create affordable housing. She added that cities typically use TIF for public infrastructure costs. In response to questions about affordable housing, Ms. Bolton explained that units typically fill up quickly and the developer can negotiate increasing the number of affordable units. She also explained that when income levels of tenants increase, they may remain. Ms. Bolton provided an overview on establishing a TIF district. In response to questions, she explained that limitations may be placed such as the duration of the district and that city policy typically dictates the amount of TIF the city will provide. She also explained that the city does not lose the ability to negotiate improvements and/or amenities in a project when TIF is used. Housing Project Initiatives The City Council discussed a proposal by Presbyterian Homes to include an affordable housing component in the 4th and Helmo development. WORKSHOP January 7, 2021 Page Two Council Member Zabel did not support the use of tax increment financing at this location as he believes it places a burden on all taxpayers. Council Member Ingebrigtson supports affordable housing but not the use of tax increment financing at the 4th and Helmo location. Mayor Reinke supported using tax increment financing for Presbyterian Homes proposed affordable housing project and noted that affordable housing is a goal of the city’s approved Comprehensive Plan and this project meets the intent of that plan. In response to a question from Council Member Zabel on Presbyterian Homes using conduit bonding, Ms. Bolton explained that the city would need to apply for conduit bonding, which would be tax exempt; however, it is a highly competitive application process, with limited available funding. Mayor Reinke indicated that offering affordable housing serves an important public purpose. Council Member Zabel noted that most residents would not be amenable to paying more taxes to have more affordable housing. Council Member Swedberg did not support the use of tax increment financing at the 4th and Helmo location and asked that other financing options be considered. In response to a question from Council Member Olson, Community Development Director Streetar commented on the significant need in the community and metro area for affordable housing. He further commented on how affordable housing assists businesses in recruiting employees. Council Member Olson shared her support for affordable housing provided it did not place a burden on others through the use of tax increment financing. Community Development Director Streetar stated that Presbyterian Homes would not develop in Oakdale without the use of tax increment financing. Mayor Reinke reiterated his support for affordable housing in the city. City Administrator Volkers informed the City Council that Presbyterian Homes and Bethesda Lutheran Communities would meet with the City Council on January 12 to discuss their respective projects. Council Member Zabel stated that he would recuse himself from the Bethesda discussion due to a conflict of interest. Adjournment The workshop adjourned at 6:56 PM. Respectfully submitted, Susan Barry, City Clerk

Agenda

AGENDA Special City Council Workshop The January 7 City Council special workshop and special meeting will be held via Zoom. Zoom is an online platform that allows persons to “attend” the meeting via video or telephone. View Special Workshop at: https://zoom.us/j/96501750899?pwd=ODZEY1BZMkJ1bHZ4VFl3QzBCQmdwdz09 from a PC, Mac, tablet, iPhone, or Android device. Or listen to the discussion by phone by calling 1-301-715-8592 and entering Meeting ID: 965 0175 0899 and Passcode: 061083, when prompted. While the workshop is available for public viewing, public comment will not be taken during the meeting. Thursday, January 7, 2021 Council Chambers 5:30 PM Call to Order Tax Increment Financing 101 Housing Project Incentives Discussion Adjournment COUNCIL MEMORANDUM To Mayor and City Council Through Christina Volkers, City Administrator Date January 7 2021 Subject Tax Increment Financing 101 At the January 7 special workshop, the City Attorney’s Office will provide a comprehensive review on Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and facilitate an education session on TIF as an incentive for development. Baker Tilly staff, as our financial consultant, will also be available to respond to questions along with city staff. Overview of Tax Increment Financing in Minnesota City of Oakdale 2021 Tax Increment Financing Background • Development finance tool • A method of capturing tax base growth resulting from new development • Use is governed by the “TIF Act” (MN Statutes, Sections 469.174-469.1794) • Available to cities, counties and development authorities • Annual compliance reporting to State Auditors Office • The TIF Act is amended often by the Legislature Tax Increment Financing Concept • Captures the local property taxes on the “increased” value resulting from development within a specific geographic area (the “TIF district”) • Fixed term for capture, then new development capacity is added to existing tax base The Concept of Tax Increment Financing A Simple Example A. Property taxes on $1.0M of Property is estimated market value (EMV) are valued at distributed to all applicable taxing $4.0M jurisdictions. B. Property taxes on the first $1.0M of EMV continue to be distributed to C all applicable taxing jurisdictions. Property is D C. Local property taxes on the $3.0M valued at of “Incremental” EMV are $1.0M distributed to the TIF Authority These taxes are referred to as “tax increment.” D. Property taxes on $4.0M of EMV A B are distributed to all applicable taxing jurisdictions. Prior to After After TIF Redevelopment Redevelopment District is (During the life Terminated of the TIF (Decertified) District) Fundamentals • Six (6) different types of TIF districts • Each type - different purpose & qualification requirements • Maximum duration of TIF district varies by type • TIF district must be located within an underlying geographic area known as a “project” (redevelopment project, economic dev. district, city dev. district, other) • Development must meet the “but-for” test • County and school district have no veto powers • Tax increment must be spent on “TIF eligible” costs General Guidelines for Eligible Expenditures • Generally eligible expenditures relate to activities needed to prepare land for development and redevelopment • Purpose is to finance the “public cost” of re/development of the project area which includes preparing the way for private development • “Ground level and below” rule of thumb • Building costs only for income qualified housing, rehabilitation costs, certain publicly owned facilities Typical “TIF Eligible” Costs • Land/building acquisition or write-down • Relocation • Demolition • Environmental/geotechnical/Soil Correction • Public improvements (utilities, roads, sidewalks, etc.) • Selected site improvements and Preparation (clearance, earthwork, etc.) • Building rehabilitation / historic preservation • Low/moderate income housing (in some cases) • Parking facilities (lots and ramps) • Administrative costs • Paying debt (principal & interest) for any of the above Prohibited Costs • Public buildings such as a City Hall, Public Safety, and Public Works buildings • Parks and social and recreational facilities such as community centers, golf courses, etc. • Administration beyond 10% of TIF collections Fundamentals of Tax Increment Financing Project Area (Development District) – Where TIF dollars can be spent, with limitations TIF District (Specific Development) - TIF Plan - Budget - Geographic boundaries TIF District 1 - Purpose - Public Hearing TIF District 3 TIF District 2 - Certification Project Area/ Development District Where Can Tax Increment Be Spent? • Older TIF districts (established prior to May 1, 1990): – 100% of Increments spent within the “project” – Projects often much larger than TIF districts – No minimum % must be spent “within” TIF district – Often multiple TIF districts within a project • Newer TIF districts (established on or after May 1, 1990): – 100% of Increments spent within the “project” – 75%-80% of Increments must be spent within “TIF district” – Exception: up to 35% of TI may be spent for qualified low income housing anywhere within the city – Projects often the same size as the TIF district Types of TIF Districts & Max. Duration Type of TIF District Years 1) Redevelopment 26 2) Low/Moderate Housing 26 3) Economic Development 9 4) Soils Condition 21 5) Renewal & Renovation 16 Redevelopment • Parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance; • Also rail yards; tank facilities; qualifying disaster areas • 90% must be used to correct conditions justifying the TIF District • 25% (less administrative costs) can be used outside TIF District Housing • a project, or a portion of a project, intended for occupancy, in part, by persons or families of low and moderate income, as defined in chapter 462A, Title II of the National Housing Act of 1934, the National Housing Act of 1959, the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, Title V of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended… • Income Limits: • • 20@50 test: 20 percent of units are occupied by individual whose income are 50% or less of the area median income, or • • 40@60 test: 40 percent of units are occupied by individual whose income are 60% or less of the area median income. • Can be used outside TIF District but only for qualified housing Economic Development • (1) it will discourage commerce, industry, or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state or municipality; • (2) it will result in increased employment in the state; • (3) it will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the state; or • 85% of the buildings and facilities (determined on the basis of square footage) receiving TIF must be used for: – (1) the manufacturing or production of tangible personal property, including processing resulting in the change in condition of the property; – (2) warehousing, storage, and distribution of tangible personal property, excluding retail sales; – (3) research and development related to the activities listed in clause (1) or (2); – (4) telemarketing if that activity is the exclusive use of the property; – (5) tourism facilities; – (6) space necessary for and related to the activities listed in clauses (1) to (5). • 20% (less administrative costs) can be used outside TIF District Soils Conditions • (a) "Soils condition district" means a type of tax increment financing district consisting of a project, or portions of a project, within which the authority finds by resolution that the following conditions exist: – (1) the presence of hazardous substances, pollution, or contaminants requires removal or remedial action for use; – (2) the estimated cost of the proposed removal and remedial action exceeds the fair market value of the land before completion of the preparation. – The requirements of clause (2) need not be satisfied, if each parcel of property in the district either satisfies the requirements of clause (2) or the estimated costs of the proposed removal or remedial action exceeds $2 per square foot for the area of the parcel. • (b) The proposed removal or remediation action must be specified in a development action response plan to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (a). • Revenue derived from tax increment from a soils condition district may be used only to (1) acquire parcels on which the improvements described in clause (2) will occur; (2) pay for the cost of removal or remedial action; and (3) pay for the administrative expenses of the authority allocable to the district, including the cost of preparation of the development action response plan. • 20% (less administrative costs) can be used outside TIF District Renewal & Renovation • (1) parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures; • (2) 20 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard; • (3) 30 percent of the other buildings require substantial renovation or clearance to remove existing conditions such as: inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other identified hazards to the health, safety, and general well-being of the community; and • Maximum Duration: 15 years • 20% (less administrative costs) can be used outside TIF District Establishing a TIF District • Process dictated by the TIF Act • Notice to County Commissioner 30 days before publication • Notice to county and school district 30 days before hearing • Notice of public hearing published (10-30 days before) • Review of project for conformity with comprehensive plan by City Planning Commission (in some cases) • Public hearing conducted by City Council • Approval by City Council (& EDA Board, if applicable) • TIF district certification request to County • Filing requirements with the MN Department of Revenue and Office of State Auditor Financial Review Process • Conducted by TIF Consultant • Financial feasibility • Debt coverage • Return on equity • Extraordinary costs • Public purpose benefits • Public versus private financing • Type of assistance • Upfront • PayGO Assessment of Need for Public Financing Assistance • Determine need for and amount of public assistance • Financing of public improvements that could not be supported by developer alone without assistance • Financing of eligible private improvements not supported by development investment returns • Verification of developer assumptions • Matching funding sources with project costs • Development would not occur ‘but-for’ assistance Due Diligence for Needs Assessment • Review sources and uses of funds • Sources include – Debt – Equity – TIF • Uses – Acquisition, construction, demolition, site work, public improvements, soft costs including financing, reserves, developer fee, contingency and other “But For” Analysis • Evaluate cash flow (operating proforma) – Test assumptions against comparables • Perform analysis to understand what is driving gap • Expenses: – Project cost estimates – Operating expenditures • Revenues: – Lease rates for residential (affordable vs market rate) and commercial – vacancy rates – Other financial public assistance Public Purpose Considerations • Achieving high quality redevelopment and private investment on sites which would not be (re)developed otherwise • Removing slum/blight and/or rehabilitate a high priority site • Offsetting increased costs of infill development (demo, site remediation) above costs normally incurred in “greenfield” development • Construction of affordable, workforce housing • Enhancing and diversifying City’s economic base • Retaining and increasing City tax base • Retaining and/or increasing number and/or diversity of jobs that offer stable employment and/or attractive wages and benefits • Facilitate infrastructure improvements • Coordinate new developments with City planning Financing Alternatives • Pay-as-you-go note is issued to the developer – Developer funds the assistance and is repaid over time – Advantage: Risk is with developer – Disadvantage: Might have higher interest rates and developer needs another funding source during construction • Bonds are issued by the City or Authority – General obligation (G.O.) or revenue debt – Advantage: Typically lower interest rate – Disadvantage: Risk is with City or Authority • Interfund loan: City provides up front money to the developer from funds on hand and repays itself with tax increment • Land Write-down • Hybrid COUNCIL MEMORANDUM To Mayor and City Council Through Christina Volkers, City Administrator Date January 7 2021 Subject Housing Project Incentives Discussion At the January 7 special workshop, the City Council will have a discussion on housing project incentives for development projects.

Get email alerts for Oakdale

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting