City Council Workshop
Regular MeetingOakdale, MN · April 11, 2023
Minutes
WORKSHOP MINUTES
OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 11, 2023
The City Council held a workshop on Tuesday, April 11, 2023 at Oakdale City Hall, 1584 Hadley
Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota. The meeting began at 5:00 PM.
Present: Mayor Kevin Zabel
Council Members: Noah Her
Jake Ingebrigtson
Andy Morcomb
Susan Olson
City Staff Members: Christina Volkers, City Administrator
Sara Ludwig, City Clerk
Andrew Gitzlaff, Community Development Director
Luke McClanahan, City Planner
Nick Newton, Police Chief
Lori Pulkrabek, Communications Manager
Jim Romanik, Public Works Manager
Kevin Wold, Fire Chief
Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director
Other: Ken Grieshaber, Project Director for SRF Consulting Group
Emily Maloney, Project Manager for Flagship Recreation
2024 BUDGET SCHEDULE
City Administrator Chris Volkers began by stating that the budget schedule is set to ensure everyone
is on the same page, but that it can be adjusted as needed.
Finance Director Jason Zimmerman explained that there are several statutorily defined dates and
activities taken into consideration when preparing the 2024 budget schedule. He reviewed a few
dates including September 12th and December 12th. Mr. Zimmerman noted that there could be a
delay in getting necessary data that assists with the preparation of the preliminary tax levy, but said
staff will do everything they can to get that information from Washington County as early as possible.
In response to Mayor Zabel’s question about any changes to OpenGov since the budget was adopted
last year, Mr. Zimmerman stated that the end user perspective has not changed, but that it is more
user-friendly from a budget development perspective.
In response to Council Member Morcomb’s question about how remaining funds get allocated, Mr.
Zimmerman noted that language in the adopted resolution for final budget 2022 transfers explains
that remaining funds rollover into the next year.
Mayor Zabel noted that some items that are approved through the budget process may not come to
fruition for a number of reasons which may result in a reevaluation of the budget.
Mr. Zimmerman said the budget schedule was created to avoid additional meetings outside of the
normal Council meeting schedule, however there is a buffer built in for additional meetings if needed.
CITY PROJECT P2023-04: WILLOWBROOKE COMMONS PARK PLAYGROUND DESIGN
Community Development Director Andy Gitzlaff began by recapping the phases of development, both
past, current, and future, for the parks within Willowbrooke as agreed upon in the Planned Unit
Master Development Agreement. He noted that the placement of key park features and pathways
has been adjusted to improve flow into the park and within the park, maximize design efficiencies,
meet watershed district wetland buffer and stormwater management requirements, and
accommodate placement of utilities. Mr. Gitzlaff added that additional public engagement was
sought on playground equipment, and those engagement results were taken into consideration while
preparing staff’s recommendation.
Ken Grieshaber, Director of Landscape Architecture for SRF Consulting Group, reviewed the refined
concept plan, going into detail about the site layout refinements. He noted that the refined concept
plan organizes the layout of park amenities into two main program areas supporting active and
passive uses in the park.
Mayor Zabel asked for clarification on the proposed community gathering shelter on the north side
of the park citing historical discussions about past concepts and site layout. Mr. Grieshaber said that
the movement of the shelter structure from previous designs is based on orientation. He noted that
SRF is still working through the concept with various vendors and will bring proposed ideas back to
Council for discussion.
Mr. Grieshaber moved on to review the park program relationship diagram including the trails, seating
areas, and playgrounds, referring to the Concept 1 and Concept 2 playground designs.
Emily Maloney, Project Manager for Flagship Recreation, explained the online playground survey
results and the rationale behind how the questions were written. She also explained how staff
discussed the survey results and prepared their recommendations based on those results.
Ms. Maloney noted that staff recommends Concept 2 with the Super Netplex Double Tower based on
the survey results and its accessible design. Other recommended components include the zip line,
swings, musical instruments, roller slide, we-go-round, challenge course, adult fitness, and shade
amenities.
In response to Ms. Volkers’ question about the material of the ground and the liability to the City if
someone were to fall from the equipment, Ms. Maloney stated that all of the playground equipment
requires impact attenuation. In this concept, staff is recommending a layer of synthetic, resilient
surface topped with turf.
In response to Council Member Ingebrigtson’s question about the City’s liability from playground
injuries, Mayor Zabel noted that cities in Minnesota have a legal liability shield for active park
amenities. Ms. Volkers referenced an email from City Attorney Jim Thomson confirming that the City
is not liable for injuries that occur on park amenities. Ms. Maloney added that all Flagship Recreation
equipment meets the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) standards.
Council Member Ingebrigtson expressed concern about the proposed musical instruments in close
proximity to residents’ homes. Ms. Maloney stated that these musical instruments are smartly
designed and may not be as loud as other versions of this type of playground amenity. She offered
to send a YouTube video to Council of what the proposed equipment would sound like.
In response to Council Member Morcomb’s question about the drop off and grading from the park
amenities area into the stormwater pond and wetland basins, Mr. Grieshaber said the grading is most
likely only 2-2.5 feet for the entire park.
In response to Council Member Morcomb’s question about the phased approach to building this park,
Mr. Grieshaber stated that staff is still trying to determine what makes the most sense and when. He
noted that the City may want to take advantage of purchasing the playground equipment through the
State’s contract which eliminates the general contractor markup. Ms. Maloney added that the
equipment could be purchased now and stored for installation down the line which would allow the
City to take advantage of 2023 pricing. Mr. Gitzlaff stated that staff is still working through the
construction timeline. Mayor Zabel cautioned that due to the Planned Unit Master Development
Agreement, staff may not be able to push the timeline out as far as desired.
Council Member Olson expressed concern about public works staffing shortages and staffing cost
once the Commons Park is constructed.
In response to Council Member Morcomb’s question about ways to prevent vandalism especially in
relation to the restrooms, Mr. Grieshaber said there are a variety of mechanisms including security
lighting and remote locking/unlocking features. Ms. Volkers noted that the City is going to try a
demonstration period this summer of leaving the restrooms at Tanners Lake Park and Walton Park
open on Saturdays and Sundays with no attendant.
Mayor Zabel stated that he would like to see an alternative to the gathering space on the north end.
He envisioned the gathering space as more centrally-located near the water based on past
conversations. Mr. Grieshaber explained that the refined concept plan was created in a way to utilize
every aspect of the park space to avoid dead spaces and allow for a variety of programmable areas.
In response to Mayor Zabel’s question about having a central gathering structure with restrooms
attached, Mr. Grieshaber stated that type of structure may be too cost prohibitive. He offered to bring
some other options back to Council for discussion.
Council Member Olson suggested that once the purpose of the central gathering structure is
determined then Council may have a better idea of where it should be located within the park. Mr.
Grieshaber encouraged the group to consider it for a multiuse purpose.
Council Member Morcomb echoed Mayor Zabel’s sentiment that the central gathering structure is
the main draw of the park, but he also said he does not want to see any dead space so he is okay
with where it is positioned now at the north end of the park.
Mayor Zabel noted that if the central gathering structure is moved further south, then the space in
the north end could be used for something else in the future.
Mr. Gitzlaff reminded the group that Commons Park is more community-centric versus a park like
Walton Park which has a regional draw.
Council Member Her asked if the City is committed to the wetland and stormwater designations as
seen in the concept plan. Mr. Gitzlaff confirmed.
Council Member Morcomb suggested the first phase start with the south end designs as Council
agrees on what has been proposed there. Ms. Volkers added that staff bring back other options for
the north end layout and amenities to a future workshop, and that can be the second phase of the
development.
SHORELAND OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT PROPOSAL
City Planner Luke McClanahan explained due to State statute, cities that have shoreland in their
boundaries must adopt management controls that protect these areas. Currently, the City does not
have an adopted shoreland overlay zoning ordinance in place. In this case, the Department of Natural
Resources (DNR) maintains regulatory authority through their Model Ordinance. By adopting a local
shoreland overlay zoning ordinance, the City would gain greater control over land use decisions on
its shoreland.
Mr. McClanahan noted that there are three (possibly four, pending the DNR’s determination) Public
Water Basins that are subject to shoreland regulations – Tanners Lake, Armstrong Lake, Mud Lake,
and potentially an unnamed water basin, DNR Basin ID 8201140. Mr. McClanahan stated that the
State’s ordinance standards are strict, but that cities can request flexibility on a case-by-case basis.
He added that City staff has been working with the DNR on deviations from the state minimum
standards, but mentioned that they recommended the Tanners Lake site be subject to a special
district for shoreland purposes.
Mr. McClanahan provided an overview of the City’s proposed setbacks in comparison to the DNR’s
standards (based on development type), noting that the City’s proposals were more aggressive than
those of the DNR. For example, City staff has proposed reducing the setback at Tanners Lake from
the Model Ordinance standard of 50 feet to an average of 15 feet, with a minimum of 10 feet. In
response, the DNR has recommended a setback closer to 40 feet.
Council Member Morcomb asked about the effect of the DNR declaring Basin ID 82011400 a Public
Water Basin subject to shoreland regulations, as that is where MWF Properties is building senior
living housing. Mr. McClanahan stated that due to the existing wetland the development was already
going to be set back a good distance from the shoreline.
Council Member Morcomb asked for clarification in regards to the proposed setback of 15 feet. Mr.
McClanahan stated it refers to parking lots, patios, pathways, or buildings, among other things being
15 feet from the shoreline.
In response to Council Member Ingebrigtson’s question about the DNR’s specific concerns with the
City’s proposed setbacks, Mr. McClanahan said the DNR’s goal is to protect the shoreline, and
increasing the distance between the shoreline and a building (or other man-made structure) is the
number one way to accomplish this.
Mayor Zabel asked the group if they support the development of a shoreland overlay zoning
ordinance. The Council was in agreeance to support this ordinance.
Council Member Her asked if there is a negotiation aspect between the City and the DNR when it
comes to adopting the proposed setbacks in the shoreland ordinance. Mr. McClanahan stated that
the DNR does a conditional review of the “near final draft” ordinance, and then after the Council
formally adopts the ordinance, the City has to request final approval from the DNR.
Ms. Volkers asked what the interested developer in the Tanners Lake property needs in regards to
the proposed setback distance. Community Development Director Andy Gitzlaff said they are figuring
that out together, however there is most likely only a small portion of the development that will need
the 15 feet setback standard. He added that although the DNR has approval authority over the City’s
ordinance, the City has local authority to deviate from the approved ordinance, through a variance
process or Planned Unit Development (PUD) deviation.
In response to Council Member Ingebrigtson’s question about the DNR intervening if the City were to
deviate from the approved ordinance, Mr. Gitzlaff noted that once the City has an adopted and
approved shoreland ordinance, the DNR’s authority becomes review only.
Mr. Gitzlaff added that the DNR is open to finding compromise especially as it relates to the Tanners
Lake property.
Ms. Volkers proposed letting staff continue negotiations with the DNR knowing that Council has
flexibility if needed.
Council Member Olson asked about the properties that would be affected by the passing of this type
of ordinance. Mr. McClanahan said there is almost always legal non-conforming lots created as a
result, but those affected at the time of the ordinance are grandfathered in. If they want to expand
after the fact, they can do so laterally or vertically, but cannot encroach any closer to the shoreline.
GIRL SCOUT BROWNIE TROOP 57987 PROJECT PROPOSAL
Council Member Olson asked the group if they were supportive of the Girl Scout’s project proposal of
adding a crosswalk across the driveway into Eberle Park on the west side of Hadley Ave N. The Council
was in agreeance to support this project proposal.
Council Member Morcomb gave a brief recap of the meeting and shared how impressed he was with
their presentation. Council Member Olson concurred.
Mayor Zabel asked Ms. Volkers to send a letter to the Troop letting them know their proposal has
been accepted. The ribbon cutting ceremony will be planned at a later date.
Public Works Manager Jim Romanik confirmed that the project can be completed this spring.
ADMINISTRATOR UPDATE
Communications Manager Lori Pulkrabek announced the Oakdale Area Chamber of Commerce
Spring Fling event is taking place on Thursday, April 20, 2023. She provided details about the event
and stated she has tickets for purchase if Council is interested in attending. Mayor Zabel reminded
the group that due to a previous discussion during Council Topics, Council pays for their own ticket
to these types of events.
Ms. Volkers noted that the Washington County Open Book meeting would be held in Council
Chambers on Wednesday, April 12th. Additionally, the Construction Manager At Risk interviews would
be taking place that same night in the Hadley Room.
Mayor Zabel brought up the naming of the annual Spring Planting Event as this was something that
was discussed in November 2021, at the time City Policy MIS-019 (Donations to Parks; Memorials in
Parks; Installation, and Maintenance; Naming of Parks, Facilities, and Events) was being revised. He
asked if Council would support changing the name to the Jane Klein Memorial Spring Planting Event,
as previously requested by a former Council Member. If supported, Mayor Zabel said he will provide
the information and language for the required resolution. Council Members Morcomb and
Ingebrigtson were supportive. At the request of Council Member Olson, Mayor Zabel explained the
criteria for naming an event after a person, and listed a variety of contributions made to the City by
the late Jane Klein. Council Members Olson and Her were supportive.
Ms. Volkers asked the group if they would like to do a naming event/contest for the Willowbrooke
Commons Park. Council was supportive of staff coordinating this initiative.
COUNCIL TOPICS
Mayor Zabel provided context for Resolution 2023-42, the formal request of Independent School
District (ISD) 622 for two School Resource Officers, that will be on the April 11th Council meeting
agenda under consensus motion.
There were mixed opinions shared about the next steps to take following the approval of Resolution
2023-42, and the meeting between the Police Chiefs and ISD622 on April 20th. Past experiences in
reference to previous requests were brought up. A variety of suggestions about negotiation and
communication strategies were shared.
In response to Council Member Olson’s question about the School Board’s budget calendar, Mayor
Zabel said their fiscal year runs July 1st – June 30th.
Mayor Zabel laid out the proposed next steps which will likely include a draft contract from ISD622
given that the current one will expire at the end of the 2022-2023 school year.
Ms. Volkers said she would provide an update via email regarding the meeting between the Police
Chiefs and ISD622.
Council Member Ingebrigtson stated that Commissioner Karwoski was supportive of Washington
County providing social workers for the City’s Police Department. Ms. Volkers said she will make a
formal request to the Washington County Administrator.
Council Member Morcomb asked if development within Willowbrooke will slow down due to the
increased interest rates. Mr. Gitzlaff said development has not slowed down, but overall sale prices
have decreased. In response to a follow up question, Mr. Gitzlaff stated that the developers do not
have an obligation to build by a certain amount of time. The City would be able to tell if development
was slowing down by the number of building permits that are submitted. Council Member Morcomb
suggested that Mr. Gitzlaff keep an eye on the sale and pricing of these homes as that will be helpful
in determining tax revenues during upcoming budget discussions. Mayor Zabel noted there is roughly
a two-year gap between when the budget is set and the tax revenue is actually received by the City
so there is time to make adjustments if needed.
Council Member Olson asked about the community solar gardens. Ms. Volkers stated that staff is
working on getting the solar panels at City Hall fixed as well as getting a handle on the other ones at
the community solar gardens. They are also looking into the details of the related contracts.
Council Member Her shared that he attended Asian and Pacific Islander Day at the Capitol and a
recent Metro Gold Line meeting held at the Union Depot.
Mayor Zabel reminded the group of the Arbor Day Tree Giveaway Event on April 29th. He asked City
staff to post notice of a quorum. Mayor Zabel also reminded the group about the Spring Planting
Event on May 6th. He said at that time he will present the resolution renaming the event to the Jane
Klein Memorial Spring Planting Event.
Mayor Zabel asked the group if there would be any support for a cigar club in Oakdale after receiving
a call from a developer. The current City Code prohibits this type of establishment; however, the
Council was open to exploring the changes that would need to be made to allow it. Mayor Zabel said
he would direct the developer to City staff to continue the discussion.
Mayor Zabel asked if Council would like to look into changing the current City Code that restricts the
number of recreational vehicles parked on a single property. Council Member Morcomb stated he
would like to know if the City has received complaints about this. Council Member Her noted that an
abundance of recreational vehicles can be a nuisance and safety concern. He would be open to
revising the current Code. Mayor Zabel asked City staff to pull the current code for a future workshop
meeting discussion.
ADJOURNMENT
The workshop was adjourned at 6:54 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Sara Ludwig, City Clerk
Agenda
AGENDA
City Council Workshop
Workshop
April 11, 2023
HADLEY CONFERENCE ROOM
5:00 PM
Amended
5:00 PM 2024 Budget Schedule
5:20 PM City Project P2023-04: Willowbrooke Commons Park Playground Design
5:50 PM Shoreland Overlay Zoning District Proposal
6:10 PM Girl Scout Brownie Troop 57987 Project Proposal
6:30 PM Administrator Update
6:35 PM Council Topics
6:50 PM Recess for Regular Meeting
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Jason Zimmerman, Finance Director
Christina M. Volkers, City Administrator
Date: April 11, 2023
Subject: 2024 Budget Schedule
BACKGROUND
In order to prepare for the 2024 budget process, staff has composed the schedule below. When
creating the calendar, the following statutorily defined dates and activities were considered:
On or before September 30: Cities of a population greater than 500, the city council must adopt a
preliminary tax levy and announce the time and place of a future city council meeting at which the
budget and levy will be discussed and public input allowed, prior to the final budget and levy
determination. This public input meeting must occur after November 24 and must start at or after 6
p.m. The time and place of the public input meeting must be included in the minutes, but newspaper
publication of the minutes is not required. Cities over 500 population must provide the county auditor
with the following information:
• The time and place of the meeting at which the budget and levy will be discussed and public
input allowed.
• A phone number that city taxpayers may call if they have questions related to the auditor’s
property tax notice.
• An address where comments will be received by mail.
Between November 11 and November 24: The county auditor prepares and sends proposed property
tax (Truth in Taxation) notices.
Between November 25 and December 28: Cities of population greater than 500 hold meeting (at 6 p.m.
or later) to discuss the budget and property tax levy and, before a final determination, allows public
input.
On, or before December 28: Cities certify the final levy. Cities must also file the certificate of compliance
with the Department of Revenue.
PROPOSED Budget Calendar FY 2024 Budget Process
March 23, 2023 - Department contacts received 2024-2033 Vehicle & Equipment Replacement
Plan/spreadsheet.
March 31, 2023 - Finance held kickoff meeting with capital requestors for the 2024-2028 Capital
Improvement Plan.
April 12, 2023 - Department heads receive email requesting any material changes to the 2023 budget
in order to maintain City services as currently operated and any requested changes to
staffing/positions.
1
April 19, 2023 - Department heads to respond back to Finance with material changes to upcoming
budget in order to maintain current City services and to Human Resources with staffing/position change
requests.
April 19 – May 23, 2023 – City Administrator and Finance Director work with department heads on
budget and personnel requests and prepares proposed increases/changes for Council
May 23, 2023 – City staff present baseline budgets for General, Enterprise, and Special Revenue
Funds, which incorporate:
• Proposed grade/steps and cost of living adjustments
• Removal of one-time charges/revenues from prior year’s budget
• General increases for contractual services and supplies
• City Administrator proposals on necessary increases to maintain current City services and limited
proposals for increased technology/service needs
• Staffing/position adjustments initiated by departments and proposed by City Administrator
City Council input on changes/enhancements/prioritization of activities will be gathered and relayed to
department heads when creating proposed budgets.
May 25, 2023 - Operating budgets are distributed to department heads with Council requests.
May 26, 2023 - Department heads to respond back to Finance with any changes to the 2024-2033
Vehicle & Equipment Replacement Plan/spreadsheet.
June 2, 2023 - Capital Improvement requests for 2024-2028 are due back to Finance by corresponding
departments.
June 9, 2023 – General, Enterprise, and Special Revenue Funds budgets are completed and returned
to Finance.
June 16 to June 30, 2023 – City Administrator & Finance review budgets with department heads.
June 27, 2023 - City staff presents Council with department proposed 2024-2033 Vehicle & Equipment
Replacement Plan and 2024-2028 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).
July 25, 2023 - Proposed 2024 General, Enterprise, and Special Revenue Funds budgets are presented
to City Council.
August 8, 2023 - Council Budget Workshop (if needed).
August 22, 2023 - Council Budget Workshop (if needed).
September 12, 2023 - City Council certifies 2024 Proposed Property Tax Levy and sets date for Truth in
Taxation meeting to adopt the final 2024 Budgets and Property Tax Levy.
Fall, 2023 - Continue discussions as needed on the 2024 budget and tax levy.
Dec 12, 2023 - Finance presents at the annual Truth in Taxation meeting. City Council adopts 2024
Budget, 2024 Tax Levy, 2024-2033 Vehicle & Equipment Replacement Plan, and 2024-2028 Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP).
2
COUNCIL DIRECTION REQUESTED
At this work session, staff would like hear from Council on the proposed timeline as presented.
3
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Luke McClanahan, City Planner
Date: April 11, 2023
Subject: Shoreland Overlay Zoning District Proposal
BACKGROUND
As required by Minnesota Statute 103F.221 (https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/103F.221),
municipalities that have shoreland in their boundaries must adopt management controls that protect
these areas. Shoreland regulations that are adopted by the municipality must substantially comply with
requirements set forth by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The DNR defines
shoreland as land located within 1,000 feet of the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of a public water
body. Shoreland typically contains important habitat and erodible soils. The management standards for
these areas are intended to accommodate development while also reducing impacts on water quality
and preserving the natural character of the water body. Examples of shoreland standards include
increased setbacks from the OHWL, building height restrictions, impervious surface limits,
vegetation/land alterations, and lot requirements.
Currently, the City of Oakdale does not have an adopted shoreland overlay zoning ordinance in place
(although the DNR acknowledges that conventional zoning setbacks have served, to a certain extent, as
de facto protection mechanisms). In the event that a municipality does not have an adopted ordinance
or rules regulating development of its shoreland, the DNR maintains regulatory authority through their
Model Ordinance (https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/watermgmt_section/shoreland/mod-ord.html).
As a result, any proposed development that occurs within defined shoreland areas requires review and
approval by the DNR. Furthermore, the Model Ordinance contains strict standards that may prove
difficult to satisfy or impractical for proposed development. By adopting a local Shoreland Overlay
Zoning district, the municipality gains greater control over land use decisions over its shoreland and
transitions the DNR’s role to a review body only.
Within the corporate boundaries of the City of Oakdale there are three (and possibly four, pending the
DNR’s determination) Public Water Basins that are subject to shoreland regulations. These include
Tanners Lake (General Development), Armstrong Lake (Natural Environment), Mud Lake (Recreational
Development), and, potentially, an unnamed water basin – DNR Basin ID 82011400 (Natural
Environment) – that is located at the southwest quadrant of I-694 and 15th St N. There are specific
standards for each Public Water Basin based on its shoreland classifications. The setback distances
from the OHWL for each classification is as follows (proposed deviations are indicated in parenthesis):
• General Development: 50 feet (proposed 30 feet)
• Natural Environment: 150 feet (proposed 50 feet)
• Recreational Development: 75 feet (proposed 50 feet)
Properties near these basins that would not meet setbacks or other minimum standards would be
granted legal non-conforming status, meaning that structures would be able to remain, or be rebuilt
under certain circumstances. The DNR also suggests there be an administrative exception built into the
ordinance for these legal non-conforming properties to expand laterally or vertically, but not to encroach
any closer to the OHWL.
1
Given the existing build-out near Armstrong Lake and Mud Lake, staff does not have much concern
about adopting standards for these areas since there are few vacant parcels left for development. For
Tanners Lake, the DNR is concerned about the proposed setback of 30 feet and recommends a further
setback and other mechanisms, such as setback averaging, to address future development. If the
setback requirement for Tanners Lake is 40 feet rather than 30 feet, there would be 16 legal non-
conforming lots created, versus 12, respectively. Staff also estimates that adopting a shoreland setback
of 50 feet for Armstrong Lake would create six legal non-conforming parcels and a setback of 50 feet
for Mud Lake would create one legal non-conforming parcel.
Public Water Basins – Location Map
To accommodate future development, particularly at the City-owned parcels near Tanners Lake, City
staff has been working closely with the DNR to identify deviations from the state minimum standards
set forth in the Model Ordinance. There is a process that governs the “implementation flexibility” to
offset the minimum standards. Flexibility from the standards is allowed at the discretion of the DNR,
provided that the municipality incorporates reasonable, alternative approaches to offset the requested
deviations. Examples of offsetting alternate approaches include natural shoreline restoration and
incorporating certain architectural design standards for buildings (e.g., varying rooflines, roof accents,
and horizontal offsets). Other best practices that could be implemented to help offset the deviations
include adding public infrastructure and access to the lake’s edge and installing a certain percentage of
permeable surface parking area.
In conversations between City staff and the DNR regarding the City-owned property at Tanners Lake, the
DNR recommends this site be subject to a special district for shoreland purposes. To enable
development of this property in a feasible manner, City staff has initially proposed reducing the OHWL
2
setbacks from the standard 50 feet to an average of 15 feet, with a minimum of 10 feet. However, the
DNR has indicated that their main concern is to protect the shoreland and recommends a setback
closer to 40 feet. It is staff’s opinion that a setback of 40 feet is not reasonable and would impact
redevelopment opportunity, therefore a compromise is necessary. As mentioned, staff is also proposing
a series of offsets to allow the requested flexibility.
Upon obtaining the City Council’s initial feedback, the following are the next steps for the City to follow
in order to adopt a shoreland ordinance.
• City staff drafts the ordinance (the draft will be forwarded to the City Council for reference)
• Request DNR conditional review of the “near final draft” ordinance
• Planning Commission holds a public hearing for the request
• City Council formally adopts the ordinance
• Request final approval from the DNR
COUNCIL DIRECTION REQUESTED
It is requested that the City Council support the development of a shoreland overlay zoning ordinance to
protect environmental features and accommodate practical development. It is also requested that the
City Council support staff’s proposed deviations from the minimum standards of the DNR’s Model
Ordinance or alternatively give staff Council’s intent.
3
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Andrew Gitzlaff, Community Development Director
Date: April 11, 2023
Subject: City Project P2023-04: Willowbrooke Commons Park Playground Design
BACKGROUND
The City is responsible for the construction of the parks within Willowbrooke to coincide with each phase
of development as agreed upon in the Planned Unit Master Development Agreement executed June 21,
2021. At the December 14, 2022 Council meeting, Council approved the Base Plus Concept for Commons
Park (the first park to be built) and an overall preliminary budget of $2,939,062 consistent with the
adopted Capital Improvement Plan. The project has been broken into 4 phases:
• Phase 1: Data Collection and Public Engagement – completed September, 2022
• Phase 2: Preliminary Design – completed December, 2022
• Phase 3: Detailed Design - ongoing
• Phase 4: Construction Administration – not started
On February 14, 2023, Council approved entering into a contract with SRF Consulting Group (SRF) to
complete Phase 3 and 4. A committee of City Community Development and Public Works staff has been
working with SRF and Flagship Recreation, the preferred playground vendor, to prepare the detailed
design plan for Commons Park. The detailed design plan in the attached memo from SRF is consistent
with the “Base Plus Concept” approved by Council at their December 14, 2022 meeting. The placement
of key park features and pathways has been adjusted to improve flow into the park and within the park,
maximize design efficiencies, meet watershed district wetland buffer and stormwater management
requirements, and accommodate placement of utilities. The attached memo from SRF provides additional
background on the design refinements.
In order to obtain broader input on playground design, additional public engagement was sought on the
playground equipment.
• A survey was hosted online from March 13, 2023 to April 1, 2023; a total of 214 responses were
received.
• Staff hosted a booth at the Discovery Center indoor farmers market on March 18, 2023 and
received written and verbal comments from 18 people.
• Staff presented to the Parks & Recreation Commission on March 21, 2023.
The attached memo from SRF also summarizes the engagement results and staff’s recommendation to
pursue Concept 2 because it offers the most accessible and inclusive features. Staff also recommends
the inclusion of highly rated components from the public engagement that can be accommodated within
budget.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
Preliminary concepts shown are within the established budget for Willowbrooke Commons Park.
Considerations such as long-term durability, maintenance cost, and ability to obtain replacement parts
have also been evaluated by City staff before inclusion into the park and playground design.
1
The City intends to use a combination of park dedication, special project funds, and remaining park tool
funds totaling up to $1,500,000 to fund initial construction of the Commons Park in 2023. The City will
likely need to bond starting in 2024 to cover the costs of all of the remainder of the Commons park
improvements; with construction of “west” park in 2025, the west parking lot of $200,000 in 2025,
trails of $825,000 from 2023-2025, and open space of $450,000 from 2023-2025. Staff anticipates
tax abatement bonds being issued that would be paid back from tax levy generated by benefiting
properties, but the levy will be increased to cover this debt service.
NEXT STEPS
Staff would return to Council in June 2023 for approval of the 100% construction plans and project
budget and to issue bids. Commons Park is tentatively planned to start construction mid-2023 and to
be complete in mid-2024.
COUNCIL DIRECTION REQUESTED
At the meeting, Community Development and Public Works staff, and representatives from SRF and
from Flagship will walk Council through the updated park design, the results of the engagement on
playground design, and staff recommendation to pursue Concept 2 for the playground design.
Attachment
SRF Memo dated April 4, 2023; including online survey results
2
Memorandum
SRF No. 16312
To: Andrew J. Gitzlaff, Community Development Director
City of Oakdale
From: Ken Grieshaber, Director of Landscape Architecture, SRF Consulting Group
Jonathan Fillmore, Landscape Architecture Design Lead, SRF Consulting Group
Emily Maloney, Sales Consultant and Project Manager, Flagship Recreation
Date: April 4, 2023
Subject: Willowbrooke Commons Park Design Update
Willowbrooke Commons Park Site Layout Refinements
The refined concept plan (see Attachment A) organizes the layout of park amenities into two main
program areas supporting active and passive uses in the park. A large multi-purpose open lawn space
on the north side of the park accommodates informal community gatherings with a large north
oriented shelter structure which can be used for both picnicking and small event performances.
Active use play areas are located on the south side of the park with a smaller adjacent picnic shelter
structure and smaller fabric canopies to provide shade for seating areas located around the perimeter
of the play containers. A large, centralized play container with rubberized surfacing accommodates
smaller pre-k and larger k-5 play equipment. A separated adult fitness equipment area adjacent to the
play equipment allows for parents to exercise while monitoring their children. A teen challenge
course is located south of the main play area and offers a circuit of strength and agility training
equipment finished with synthetic turf surfacing. A forty-yard dash with a timing clock will also be
included in the teen challenge course area to provide a component for all skill levels.
Generous lawn areas surround the perimeter of the play areas to accommodate informal play and
provide buffers to the surrounding walk and street edges. Additional bench seating, picnic tables,
trash receptacles, bicycle parking, and a drinking fountain will also be provided around the perimeter
of play areas. A restroom building is centrally located along the main park entrance walk so it can
easily be accessed from the play areas and the large open lawn picnic space.
Walk circulation is organized to provide options for visitors to walk smaller or larger loops within
the park along with the walk being installed around the perimeter of the park. A centralized trail
following the edge of the adjacent wetland complex and storm pond provides connections to park
destinations and crosswalks leading to adjacent neighborhood walks on north and south ends of the
park. The main park entrance walk is aligned with an east trail connection into the adjoining
neighborhood. The main park entrance walk also connects directly to the existing thirty-five car
parking area off Henna Avenue North. A direct trail connection from the parking lot to the
www.srfconsulting.com
3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 | 763.475.0010
Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer
Willowbrooke Commons Park Design Update April 5, 2023
City of Oakdale Page 2
playground is also provided. Additional on-street parking is available on adjacent neighborhood
streets.
Several seating node overlooks are provided along the wetland and stormwater pond edge trail to
take advantage of views and provide the opportunity for visitors to interact with the adjacent natural
resource environment of the park. A variety of seating types are provided including fixed benches,
chairs, picnic tables, limestone blocks, and hammocks for park users. Opportunities to integrate
benches from the City’s memorial bench program is also being explored. Overstory trees will be
planted throughout the park to provide shade for seating and lawn areas and shrub and perennial
plantings will be used to define park entries and enhance programming and seating areas.
Native prairie buffers are proposed to be established around the perimeter of the wetland complex
and storm pond basin to create a more sustainable and low maintenance landscape and provide a
high-quality vegetation, water, wetland, and wildlife habitat area for the park.
Playground Survey Results
The Willowbrooke Commons Playground Survey was open for public comment from March 13th to
April 1st. The survey was advertised on the City’s social media channels and website. A total of 214
responses were received. Survey result summary charts and tables are included in Attachment C. The
images shown in the survey are included in Attachment B. The survey was divided into 3 main
components. The first was a fill in the blank style questionnaire on the preliminary concepts. The
second focused on preferred equipment choices and the third was general project comments and
feedback along with demographic information. Preliminary concepts shown are within the
established budget for Willowbrooke Commons Park. Considerations such as long-term durability,
maintenance cost and ability to obtain replacement parts have also been evaluated by City Staff
before inclusion into the preliminary concepts.
Preliminary Concept Feedback
This portion of the survey was set up to filter out the most liked ideas from each of the two
preliminary concepts (see Attachment B). The towers were the most liked features in each of the
preliminary concepts (received 98 and 89 write ins for options 1 and 2 respectively) followed closely
by Zip Line (81 comments) and Swings (69 comments). Provision for shade and seating was a
desired feature with 56 responses. Also highly valued was the Challenge Course (59 comments) and
Adult Fitness (35 comments). Inclusive play features also ranked highly as the most exciting and
interesting feature: Musical Instruments (38 comments), We Go Round accessible merry go round
(38 comments), and Sensory Wall (34 comments).
Preferred Equipment Feedback
Similar results were compiled in the next set of questions asking for preferred equipment choices.
The Zip Line (133 votes) and Swings (99 votes) were the most appealing motion equipment. The net
climbers related to the two tower systems (227 votes total), Trail Blazer Climber (121 votes) and
Belted Climber (106 votes), were the most appealing climbing play features. The fiber-reinforced
concrete nature-themed climbers included in Concept 1 were not preferred. The most liked sensory
Willowbrooke Commons Park Design Update April 5, 2023
City of Oakdale Page 3
features were Musical Instruments (141 votes) and the Roller Slide (103 votes.) The most appealing
inclusive features were the Musical Instruments (102 votes) and the We Go Round (89 votes).
The challenge course most preferred equipment selections were the Jump Hang (118 votes) and the
Ledge Hanger (101 votes) followed by the Quintuple Steps (57 votes) and A-Frame Cargo net (51
votes).
The adult fitness section showed a preference to the Elliptical (114 votes), Squat Press (65 votes),
and Assisted Row/ Push up (43 votes.)
General Comments and Demographics
The end of the survey asked for any other comments or feedback and 90 of 214 people wrote in
additional feedback. The most common feedback was as follows:
1. Requesting the addition of a splash pad or other water feature (25 comments)
2. Requesting accessibility and inclusivity in the final design (18 comments)
3. Requesting options for all ages to be included in the final design (13 comments)
The majority of the respondents that live in Oakdale are in the 25-44 age group category. The
majority of the responses were from people who identified as White (72%), followed by Hispanic/
Latino (6%) and Asian (5%). 10% chose not to answer the question.
Indoor Market Community Engagement
City staff were available at the Indoor Market to gather feedback on the playground concepts and
features. Images included in the online survey were printed on large boards and displayed at the
Indoor Market on Saturday March 18th. The public was asked to place post-it note comments of
features they like most. A total of 13 post-it note comments were received and 18 people provided
verbal comments. Providing shade accommodation was the most liked feature with four votes
received. The challenge course, rubber surfacing, seating areas, and natural elements all received two
votes for the most liked feature. Other elements that received one vote include benches,
accessibility, climbing, more pre-school elements, zip line, and swings. The top two motion elements
include the We Go Round (4 votes) and the zip line (3 votes). The Log Climber was the most
popular climbing element with 4 votes. For sensory friendly features, the roller slide had the most
votes with 5 followed by the Cozy Dome with 2 votes. The Jump Hang (2 votes), Wheel Bridge (1
vote), and Ledge Hanger (1 vote), were teen challenge features with votes received. The most
popular adult fitness equipment was elliptical (3 votes) and the Tai Chi Wheels (2 votes).
Parks Commission Feedback
The playground survey was presented to the Parks Commission on Tuesday March 21st. The
presentation started by reviewing the park relationship diagram and was followed by walking the
Commission through the images and questions included in the online survey. The Parks
Commission had the following feedback:
Willowbrooke Commons Park Design Update April 5, 2023
City of Oakdale Page 4
o Concern with musical instruments being a noise nuisance to neighbors and concern that the
elements to be lost or stollen.
o Concern with potential user conflict with musical instruments adjacent to adult fitness.
o Liked concept 2 because it was spread out more and provided more separation between age
groups.
o Both tower options shown in concept 1 and concept 2 were well received.
o Generally liked the poured-in place pattern and universal accessibility.
o Concerns with how well equipment will stand up to the Minnesota elements and winters.
o Concerns that younger children might play on teen challenge course equipment and get hurt
causing liability issues.
o Concerns over metal elements getting too hot (Mobius Climber).
o Zip lines are a popular element that would be nice to include.
o Concern that bigger kids might spin the spinning elements such as the We Go Round too
fast causing premature equipment failure.
o All the climbing elements were well liked.
o The roller slide was well received.
o The learning panels were well received. The Parks Commission thought little kids would like
those.
o The challenge course and adult challenge course were well received. Liked that it provides
activities for teens.
o Some concern over lack of parking if the new amenities such as the challenge course become
popular.
o All fitness equipment was liked.
o Some of the fitness equipment focus should be on the elderly community such as the
mobility and hand cycle element.
Willowbrooke Commons Park Design Update April 5, 2023
City of Oakdale Page 5
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the consultants create a new preferred playground design that prioritizes the
highest rated features from the survey, the indoor farmer’s market event and Parks Commission
input. Due to the public’s preference to focus on inclusive and accessible design, staff has
recommended Concept 2 as the preferred concept. This concept features the Super Netplex dual
tower system which would be the first of its kind in the Twin Cities metro and was highly rated ib
the survey. The Super Netplex features the belted climber which offers access to the highest levels
of the tower to anyone with the ability to transfer out of a wheelchair, making it the most inclusive
option. Staff has also recommended the inclusion of the following components:
1. Zip Line
2. Swings
3. Musical Instruments
4. Roller Slide
5. We Go Round
6. Challenge Course: 40-Yard Dash, Jump Hang, Quintuple Steps, and A-Frame Cargo Net
7. Adult Fitness: Elliptical, Squat Press, Assisted Row/ Push Up
8. Shade
In general, the play design focuses on accessible and inclusive design along with making sure all the
identified areas (2-5 year old, 5-12 year old, Teen Challenge, and Adult Fitness) remain in the final
design. As space and budget allow, staff recommends that the play design try to incorporate as many
of the other highly rated items as possible.
Attachments
Attachment A: Refined Concept Plan
Attachment B: Online Playground Survey Images
Attachment C: Online Playground Survey Results
Boardwalk Overlook
40th St Trash & Recycling Receptacle
Seating Node
8’ Wide Bituminous Trail
Overlook Seating Node with Chairs
Community Gathering Shelter
Native Prairie Wetland Buffer (25’ Min - 75’ Average)
N
Ave
na
Hen
Existing
Wetland Hammock Grove
Large Group
Gathering Lawn
Existing Sidewalk Native Prairie Pond Buffer (10’ Min.)
Boulder Seating Embankment
Overlook Seating Node with Chairs
Existing Parking
Overlook Seating Node - Limestone Block Existing Sidewalk
Shade Tree
Existing
Stormwater Pond Bicycle Parking and Trash Receptacle
Park Identification Sign
Park Entrance Landscape Feature
Restroom Building
Drinking Fountain
Helmo Ave N
10’x10’ Shade Umbrella with Picnic Table
Parent Supervision Fitness Equipment
6’ Wide Concrete Walk
Pre-K & K-5 Play Container
Bicycle Parking and Trash Receptacle
24’ x 24’ Picnic Shelter
Trash & Recycling Receptacle
Bench
Challenge Course
Existing
Wetland
Boardwalk Overlook
Seating Node
Native Prairie Wetland Buffer (25’ Min - 75’ Average)
Existing Wall
Upper 38th St N
Attachment A: Refined Concept Plan
Willowbrooke Commons Park, City of Oakdale MN Job No. 16312
April 4, 2023
ATTACHMENT B – ONLINE
PLAYGROUND SURVEY
IMAGES
ATTACHMENT C – ONLINE
PLAYGROUND SURVEY
RESULTS
Willowbrooke Commons Playground Survey
Q1 Which features (materials, layout, theme, equipment, etc ) do you find
most exciting and interesting about Concept 1?
Answered: 189 Skipped: 25
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Your favorite: 100.00% 189
2nd favorite: 94.18% 178
3rd favorite: 88.89% 168
1 / 14
Which features (materials, layout, theme, equipment, etc) Do you
find most exciting and interesting about Concept 1?
Response Number of Responses
Play Odyssey Tower 98
Shade 56
2 to 5 Play Structure 52
Musical Instruments 38
Adult Fitness 35
Sensory Wall 34
We Saw 33
Omni Spinner 27
Coze Dome 23
Mobius Climber 21
Picnic Tables 21
Shade and Tables 19
Accessible 8
Color Scheme 8
Layout 8
Chill Spinner 7
Equipment 6
Theme 6
Mixed ages 4
Neither 3
No sand or wood chips 3
Please put in pickleball 3
recycled material on the ground 3
Climber 2
Open slides 2
Open space 2
Slides 2
A lot of different areas of play 1
Materials 1
Needs a roller slide! 1
Needs toddler friendly 1
Rubber surface 1
Separate equipment for age groups 1
Toddler friendly please!! 1
Trees 1
Unique items 1
Variety of equipment 1
Water fountain 1
Willowbrooke Commons Playground Survey
Q2 Which features (materials, layout, theme, equipment, etc ) do you find
most exciting and interesting about Concept 2?
Answered: 195 Skipped: 19
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Your favorite: 99.49% 194
2nd favorite: 92.82% 181
3rd favorite: 87.69% 171
2 / 14
Which features (materials, layout, theme, equipment, etc) Do you
find most exciting and interesting about Concept 2?
Response Number of Responses
Super Netplex Double Tower 89
Zip Line 81
Swings 69
Challenge Course 59
We Go Round 38
2‐5 Play Structure 34
Adult Fitness 30
Shade 25
Hemisphere Climber 18
Musical Instruments 15
Sensory Wall 15
Shade and tables 9
Swings and zip line 9
Climber 6
Layout 6
Equipment 5
Picnic tables 5
Accessible 4
Concept 2 3
Please put in pickleball 3
Theme 3
Separate equipment for age groups 2
A lot of different areas of play 1
Bigger layout 1
Bigger toddler area 1
Concept 1 1
Enclosed slide 1
Interactive and exploration 1
Large slide 1
More adult areas 1
More open space 1
More stuff to do 1
Open concept 1
Roller Slide 1
This looks safer! 1
To separate 1
Willowbrooke Commons Playground Survey
Q3 When you imagine neighborhood kids playing here, which two motion
play features from the above do you think they will find the most
appealing?
Answered: 211 Skipped: 3
Omni Spin
We Go Round
Swings
Zip Line
Double Slide
Whooshwinder
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Omni Spin 18.96% 40
We Go Round 36.02% 76
Swings 46.92% 99
Zip Line 63.03% 133
Double Slide 13.74% 29
Whooshwinder 18.96% 40
Total Respondents: 211
3 / 14
Willowbrooke Commons Playground Survey
Q4 When you imagine neighborhood kids playing here, which two climbing
play features from the above do you think they will find the most
appealing?
Answered: 211 Skipped: 3
Trail Blazer
Climber
Belted Climber
Portal Climber
Log Stack
Climber
Log Balance
Beam
Wood Wiggle
Ladder
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Trail Blazer Climber 57.35% 121
Belted Climber 50.24% 106
Portal Climber 28.44% 60
Log Stack Climber 35.55% 75
Log Balance Beam 15.17% 32
Wood Wiggle Ladder 10.90% 23
Total Respondents: 211
4 / 14
Willowbrooke Commons Playground Survey
Q5 When you imagine neighborhood kids playing here, which two sensory
play features from the above do you think they will find the most
appealing?
Answered: 211 Skipped: 3
Cozy Dome
Learning Panels
Sensory Wall
Roller Slide
Musical
Instruments
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Cozy Dome 30.33% 64
Learning Panels 11.85% 25
Sensory Wall 39.34% 83
Roller Slide 48.82% 103
Musical Instruments 66.82% 141
Total Respondents: 211
5 / 14
Willowbrooke Commons Playground Survey
Q6 Which two inclusive elements do you think would include the most
people and bring the most benefit to the neighborhood and city?*Note
there are inclusive features in the three images above.
Answered: 211 Skipped: 3
Omni Spin
We Go Round
Belted Climber
Cozy Dome
Learning Panels
Sensory Wall
Roller Slide
Musical
Instruments
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Omni Spin 16.59% 35
We Go Round 42.18% 89
Belted Climber 16.11% 34
Cozy Dome 9.95% 21
Learning Panels 7.58% 16
Sensory Wall 38.39% 81
Roller Slide 18.01% 38
Musical Instruments 48.34% 102
Total Respondents: 211
6 / 14
Willowbrooke Commons Playground Survey
Q7 When you imagine neighborhood teens utilizing the adult fitness teen
challenge course, what two features do you think they will find the most
appealing?
Answered: 200 Skipped: 14
Quintuple Steps
A-Frame Cargo
Net
Jump Hang
Wheel Bridge
Ledge Hanger
Vertical Cargo
Net
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Quintuple Steps 28.50% 57
A-Frame Cargo Net 25.50% 51
Jump Hang 59.00% 118
Wheel Bridge 18.00% 36
Ledge Hanger 50.50% 101
Vertical Cargo Net 15.00% 30
Total Respondents: 200
7 / 14
Willowbrooke Commons Playground Survey
Q8 When you imagine neighborhood adults utilizing the adult fitness
equipment, what two equipment pieces do you think they will find the most
appealing?
Answered: 200 Skipped: 14
Balance Steps
Elliptical
Squat Press
Hand Cycler
Ab Crunch/Leg
Lift
Chest/Back
Press
Assisted Row
Push Up
Parallel Bars
Mobility
Tai Chi Wheels
Stretch
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
8 / 14
Willowbrooke Commons Playground Survey
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Balance Steps 10.50% 21
Elliptical 57.00% 114
Squat Press 32.50% 65
Hand Cycler 12.00% 24
Ab Crunch/Leg Lift 16.50% 33
Chest/Back Press 13.00% 26
Assisted Row Push Up 21.50% 43
Parallel Bars 11.00% 22
Mobility 8.50% 17
Tai Chi Wheels 3.50% 7
Stretch 11.00% 22
Total Respondents: 200
9 / 14
Willowbrooke Commons Playground Survey
Q9 Do you have any other comments or feedback?
Answered: 90 Skipped: 124
10 / 14
Do you have any other comments or feedback?
A slightly 8‐12 geared playground would be amazing
A splash pad would be a great addition to Oakdale
A splash pad would be great. I went to a similar park this last summer and it was great but SO HOT. A splash pad
or some kind of misting would have been great.
Adult equipment is nice. But…. They are not practical because they get wet and stick making it hard on your
joints. There is one in St Paul park and I have used it multiple years and hated how it was not good for your
joints.
As a mother of a 9 and 11 year old, and wife to a husband who likes to get a workout in when he brings the kids
to the park, I appreciate the inclusion of equipment for older kids and adults.
As a parent, I would find it very difficult to watch my child on the playground while I exercise. It would make
more sense to me to separate these areas of equipment, which would allow for more family space in the play
area with tables and equipment for diverse ages and abilities. Will there be an area to fill water bottles?
Beautiful designs! So excited for a beautiful play space in Oakdale!
Can’t wait!!
COnsidering the ground type is important when it comes to MN winter/summer. (Not interested in
sand/gravel/rocks/wood chips)
Despite “unsafe” playgrounds generations of kids made it to adulthood playing with rocks, sand, wood and metal
slides.
Don't forget a water fountain please.
Ensure there is adequate shade features over the play equipment
Equipment for all ages and abilities would be a great addition to Oakdale parks
Good to have more options in Oakdale for parks!
Having 2 under 4 we’d love to see more safer options. Like no openings on high slides.
Having the play equipment to spread out makes it difficult for parents to keep an eye on more than 1 child. The
added shade is a must. Would be wonderful if a splash pad could be added as well. Oakdale is lacking in water
features for families. I rarely see many adults or teens using outdoor fitness features. I have been to many many
playgrounds and parks with my grandkids.
How about a kid friendly water sprinkler area or splash pad, where kids can cool off on hot days? But my main
concern would be a park guard to keep kids from vandalizing the new park!!
I have kids with a range 2‐11. I like parks that have something for the older kids too.
I have two kids and plan on taking them here. I also like Walton skate park and wish there was more skate park
stuff in oakdale(pump track, shallow bowl, mini ramp, etc)
I like how we are catering to a wider age range!!
I like seeing the recycled materials used for the surface of the playgrounds.
I like the idea of having different elements for each age group and thinking of those with disabilities. Checkout
the city of Hugo’s Lions Volunteer Park. It looks s awesome!
I like the Theme of the first playground option
I love that accessibility is a goal of this project. Shade and places for parents to sit with good views of the park
are important.
I love that teen appropriate equipment is being considered! I would have loved this as a teen, and probably still
will as an adult. This makes the park a place the whole family can enjoy at their own levels of fitness. I also love
the adult fitness stations being around the play area for supervision. I think that would make it easier to show
get some exercise in while the kids are playing.
I love that the city has requested input!
I love the nature theme and big slides in the Odyssey Tower in Concept 1.
I would like to see more natural elements included in the playground.
I’d love to see a nature play space for kids, with natural elements and more open ended play. Dakota County has
one, or Battle Creek has a small one. Lots of good research on them. Or just open play spaces. Consider families
who have babies/toddlers AND older kids when doing layout. I don’t think many adults will really use the fitness
spaces… could that be used in some other way? Maybe a space for community gathering (concerts, plays,
picnics)? Or a splash pad? Bathrooms with changing tables? Or even an outdoor changing table spot.
Is there any 3M environmental concerns or toxic danger?
It good
It would be really nice to have a splash pad in Oakdale.
It would have been nice to include a splash pad for kids in the summer.
Looking forward to this. Need challenging things for older kids but cute area for toddlers too. Adult areas would
be ideal to show kids that we move our bodies in fun ways too!
Looks like a great park. Having shade woulf be nice. I don't know how much the adult fitness stuff will get used.
lots of water and trees and shade please
Love this investment Into the community. Other parks gave had individual deck style chairs with 2 or 3 in a semi
circle. Loved these for smaller groups/families
More inclusive parks in all Oakdale please!
more seating
My son is autistic and he would love a sensory park!!
Need to put in splash pad
Needs dog walking paths
No
No water fountain close by. Roller slide can get little fingers caught in it. A basketball court is ideal for teens.
Oakdale does not have a splash pad. It would be nice if one could be worked in to this park or something in a
near future.
Oakdale NEEDS more toddler friendly equipment! There is hardly anything that toddlers can safely climb and
explore in the entire east metro. If it were to include toddler SAFE equipment, this Oakdale park would be a hit
among families from the entire east metro and greater twin cities. The lack of toddler safe playground
equipment is an object of discussion among families from all over.
Option for a splash pad?
Park should have pieces of equipment not found in other Oakdale Parks
Parking will be a nightmare
Please be mindful of budget, longevity of equipment, maintenance and overall usefulness to the entire
community. Understated park basics like slides and swings are more than enough to keep kids entertained.
Inclusivity and accessibility is important as well, so it would be important to keep those in mind as well. The best
parks we go to have musical instruments and sensory walls that all kids can enjoy.
Please consider the best options for equipment that will stand up to the harsh winters and not be vandalized.
Please do not include any water/splash pad features. I avoid parks that have those, as I often am not prepared
for my kids to get wet!
Please don't make the young children playground sections too high. So many playgrounds are so tall now.
Please include surfaces around equipment that wheelchair users can access. One of the pictures showed a child
in a wheelchair on “tan bark”. Not a good surface. If there is going to be be a swing for children with disabilities
please place it on the end for easy transfer if the area surface is sand or tan bark.
Please included a lot of adult fitness exercise machines at the playground so when the kids are playing around,
the adult can exercise.
Please make this a unique park that doesn't copy nearby destination playgrounds like Woodbury or Shoreview!
Please plant large trees for shade. Most parks get used a lot in the summer and shade is needed for parents and
small children to stay cool. Also include a easy access water fountain/station for refilling water bottles. Thank
you for asking our input.
Please update or have more parks.
Shade. Be sure especially youngest kid area has shaded cover for any slides or sitting equipment that would get
hot I'm the sun that they wouldnt know to be careful on
Slide and ladder shoul not be open
So happy a playground an inclusive playground is built, as parent with a child with Autism.
Soft floors pls. No gravel or woocbups
Splash pad
Splash pad Volleyball nets!
SPLASH PAD!!!!!!!
Super excited about the option to rent space for birthday parties
teen/adult challenge course is a very good idea and can really help get older kids involved in
play/fitness/movement. It increases the length of stay for the adults and then the kids get to play longer
Thank you for the opportunity to collect feedback. Love the designs and equipment pictured and can't wait for
the final result to play there with our kiddo.
The first playground design looks way too similar to Shoreview's new park. Please think outside the box and have
something new and original to Oakdale!
The only accessible park nearby is Lake Elmo Elementary. Other Oakdale parks have woodchips or sand which
are not wheelchair accessible even though there are ramps to the playground.
The schools around the area have many students who have autism or are handicapped. Please consider them.
The zip line (the sitting kind) is always a hit when I take my daughter (5) to parks around the cities. Usually there
is a line of kids waiting for their turn.
Things that are important: accessible, multi‐use spaces, multiple areas for kids to play, shaded options, a walking
path, and restrooms
This is so exciting! Thanks for this survey
This is very disappointing. The park is going to be the same as all Oakdale parks only with newer equipment.
What we really need is a public pool. Sad that we're just doing the same stuff not adding to the community.
This looks amazing! I can’t wait! Thank you for planning such a beautiful structure.
Water feature or splash pad?
Water features would be nice
Water splash pad or some kind of water splash activity for kids
Water splash pad similar to Woodbury healtheast playground (Madison’s place) would be a huge attraction in
oakdale. Woodbury playground is great fun for kids…only complaint is difficult as a parent to maintain line of
sight to kids. Shore view has a new playground at their community center which is also great. Similar issue is
that it is so big you have to be very aware where your kid is at and move with them to maintain line of sight.
We live in the Springs at Willowbrooke complex and have two children, ages 8 and 5. We are so so excited for
this! What an amazing addition this will be!
We want one that has shade
What about a splash pad
When choosing the final layout please consider all sensory needs. I like the shade options in concept 1 and the
swings in concept 2. Combining these options allows for a more inclusive playground to be enjoyed by everyone.
Why are there no active sporting amenities, like pickleball courts or disc golf fields?
Would like to see handicap accessible. Like the idea of adult fitness. Could build a bandshell like Walton has and
offer group fitness classes
Would love a splash pad or pool!
Would love to see Adult Fitness Park!!!
Would love to see some water features for the summer months.
Would love to see Walton Park get revamped. It is right near the police department, fire station and where we
hold the annual carnival/parade. The appearance of Oakdale residents would improve and may cause some to
feel like the area is kept up nicer and decide to move here.
Willowbrooke Commons Playground Survey
Q10 Please provide an email if you wish to receive updates about the
project:
Answered: 67 Skipped: 147
11 / 14
Willowbrooke Commons Playground Survey
Q11 Do you live in Oakdale?
Answered: 193 Skipped: 21
Yes
No - I live
in:
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes 93.78% 181
No - I live in: 6.22% 12
TOTAL 193
12 / 14
Willowbrooke Commons Playground Survey
Q12 What age are you?
Answered: 193 Skipped: 21
Less than 18
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
I prefer not
to say.
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Less than 18 1.04% 2
18-24 2.07% 4
25-34 31.09% 60
35-44 43.52% 84
45-54 9.33% 18
55-64 8.29% 16
65+ 4.66% 9
I prefer not to say. 0.00% 0
TOTAL 193
13 / 14
Willowbrooke Commons Playground Survey
Q13 Please indicate your ethnicity:
Answered: 191 Skipped: 23
American
Indian or...
Asian
Black or
African...
Hispanic/Latino
White
Two or more
ethnicities
I prefer not
to answer.
Other (please
specify)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
American Indian or Alaskan Native 0.52% 1
Asian 5.24% 10
Black or African American 1.05% 2
Hispanic/Latino 6.28% 12
White 72.25% 138
Two or more ethnicities 3.14% 6
I prefer not to answer. 10.47% 20
Other (please specify) 1.05% 2
TOTAL 191
14 / 14
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: City Administrator, Christina M. Volkers
Date: April 11, 2023
Subject: Girl Scout Brownie Troop 57987 Project Proposal
BACKGROUND
At the February 28, 2023 workshop meeting, Mayor Zabel mentioned that local Girl Scout Brownie Troop
57987 reached out about submitting a project proposal to the City Council that would help improve the
community. They requested a member(s) of Council attend their March 30, 2023 meeting to hear their
proposal. The Council decided that this item would be added to the subsequent workshop meeting for
discussion after the Girl Scout’s presentation. If their proposal was accepted, Mayor Zabel suggested
sending the Troop a letter of notification and suggest a ribbon cutting for the project when complete.
Council Members Olson and Morcomb attended the Troop meeting on March 30, 2023 to hear their
project presentation. The Girl Scouts presented their proposal of adding a crosswalk across Hadley
Avenue, at Eberle Park and 38th Street.
After a brief negotiation between the Scouts and Council Members Olson and Morcomb, it was decided
that a crosswalk would be proposed to be painted across the driveway into Eberle Park, on the west side
of Hadley Ave N. and not across Hadley.
Public Works staff has indicated this project proposal is achievable and within budget as currently
proposed.
COUNCIL DIRECTION REQUESTED
Staff is requesting that the City Council indicate intent in regards to the Girl Scout Brownie Troop 57987’s
project proposal of adding a crosswalk across the driveway into Eberle Park on the west side of Hadley
Avenue N.
Attachment
Original Girl Scout Brownie Troop 57987 Project Proposal Presentation
Hello, and welcome! We are Girl Scout Brownie Troop 57987.
(Girls introduce selves)
Our Oakdale-based troop has been together since 2019.
Together, we have completed many achievements, participated
in community events, and volunteered our time to improve the
community. We care about Oakdale because many of us live
here, attend school here, and play here.
We invited you here today to propose a new safety
feature at a local park. Eberle Park is located in the
northern region of Oakdale, just off Hadley Avenue.
Even though the park is smaller than the Oakdale
Nature Preserve, which is just north of Eberle, it is a
busy and lively area thanks to the many people who
live nearby.
Our troop is very familiar with this park, and have
already been working to improve the area for years
to come. Here is a photo of our troop in 2021, after
we spent hours cleaning up trash and debris from
the playground. Your own governmental Facebook
page featured our efforts!
Our troop hopes to continue improving the park
for years to come, as it is loved by so many of us.
Here is the playground where many of us have
built our friendships over the years. As you can
see, the play structure is very appealing to kids of
all ages.
In fact, many of our troop members live within a block
or two of this park, as shown by the stars on this map.
The park is walkable distance to hundreds of families,
however it is located on a busy street, and we have
noticed that the park entrance is missing something
very important: a crosswalk across Hadley Avenue.
To get to this park, half of the neighborhood must first
cross Hadley Avenue. Girls in our troop have
witnessed cars speeding by, as well as distracted
drivers. Many children and adults bike and run
through this park and on the sidewalks around it. We
are worried about the safety of park visitors, as there is
a risk of getting hit by a car.
Because we want to make the area around the park
safer, we are proposing a crosswalk across Hadley
Avenue, at Eberle Park and 38th Street. We feel that a
crosswalk will send a message to drivers to slow down,
and stop for park visitors. We are scared that we, or
our neighbors, will get hit by a car, and a crosswalk
would help us feel safer.
Thank you!
• Lily V. • Troop leaders:
• Emi F. • Julie M.
• Jennifer B.
• Ellie B. • Suzanne E.
• Hailey M.
• Sami C.
• Teagan W.
• Ella B.
• Maesyn E.
Thank you for listening to our proposal for a crosswalk
at Eberle Park and 38th Street across Hadley Avenue.
We pledge to continue serving our community and
thank you for your service to the City of Oakdale. We
are now open to questions or alternate suggestions.
Get email alerts for Oakdale
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.