City Council Workshop
Regular MeetingOakdale, MN · June 10, 2025
Minutes
WORKSHOP MINUTES
OAKDALE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 10, 2025
The City Council held a workshop on Tuesday, June 10, 2025 at Oakdale City Hall, 1584
Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota. The meeting began at 5:00 PM.
Present: Mayor Kevin Zabel
Council Members: Andy Morcomb
Kari Moore
Gary Severson
City Staff Members: Christina Volkers, City Administrator
Sara Ludwig, City Clerk
Jake Foster, Assistant City Administrator
Andy Gitzlaff, Community Development Director
Kristina Handt, Interim Finance Director
Melanie Lee, Human Resources Director
Max Lohse, Community Development Specialist
Nick Newton, Police Chief
Lori Pulkrabek, Communications Manager
Cory Tietz, Public Works Director
Others Present: Jackie Huegel, Principal with LB|Carlson
Kyle Stasica, Former Finance Director
NEW WILLOWBROOKE PARKS NAMING
Community Development Director Andy Gitzlaff reminded the group of the amenities of the
two yet-to-be-named Willowbrooke parks. He also referenced the City Policy that outlines
naming of City parks, the list of names that were submitted for the Willowbrooke Commons
naming contest last year, and a few names brainstormed by City staff.
The Council discussed a variety of names and ultimately landed on three finalists for each
park. For Willowbrooke Park North – Acorn Nature Park, Otuhu Park, and Pathways Park at
Willowbrooke; and for Willowbrooke Park West – Oak Grove Sports Park, Pine Ridge Park, and
Willowbrooke Fields Park.
The Council directed staff to put the finalist names up for a public vote.
REVIEW OF CITY OF OAKDALE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 9, ARTICLE 18 – CANNABIS
AND HEMP BUSINESS REGULATIONS
Community Development Specialist Max Lohse noted that this item is a follow up from the
May 27, 2025 Workshop and is related to cannabis and hemp regulations. The proposed
ordinance changes include improved clarity for setback measurements, removal of tribal
WORKSHOP MINUTES
JUNE 10, 2025
PAGE TWO
exemptions, and minor changes to license terminology to comply with recent statutory
updates. Additionally, staff is seeking direction on setback regulations for schools.
Mayor Zabel was hesitant to change the setback regulations at this point as there may not be
enough information to make an informed decision.
Assistant City Administrator Jake Foster provided clarity on the maximum number of cannabis
retailers in the City which the Office of Cannabis Management confirmed is three.
Mayor Zabel inquired about the number of cannabis retailers registered by Washington County
given that the County’s cannabis retailer registrations impact the City’s cap. Ms. Volkers
offered to add a step in the internal registration workflow to have City staff reach out to the
County when a cannabis retailer applies to confirm registration limits.
Council Member Morcomb was open to lessening the setback regulations to 500 feet for
schools. Council Member Severson agreed.
Regarding the question of whether a new park built within 500 feet of a registered cannabis
retailer would exempt that business from license renewal, Mr. Foster noted that there is no
language currently in City of Oakdale Code of Ordinances, Chapter 9, Article 18 that addresses
this; however, City of Oakdale Code of Ordinances, Chapter 10, Article II, Sec. 10-13 has
language that grandfathers in licensed liquor businesses in this instance. Staff offered to
reach out to the City Attorney about whether this same language from Chapter 10 should be
added to Chapter 9, Article 18.
Council Member Moore suggested the Council take a wholistic look at cannabis and hemp
regulations in the City.
Next steps involve the Council reviewing the entirety of Chapter 9, Article 18 and sending any
topics for discussion to Ms. Volkers in the next couple weeks. The goal is to have the amended
ordinance passed by the end of August. Additionally, the Council was open to reviewing
Chapter 25, Article 19 – Signs, but that will be secondary to the cannabis and hemp revisions.
Ms. Volkers confirmed that the current setback regulations will remain until the entire
ordinance is reviewed and passed later this summer.
REVIEW OF 2024 FINANCIAL AUDIT
Jackie Huegel, Principal with LB|Carlson, briefly went over the three reports provided to
Council, the auditor’s role, and audit results for the year ended December 31, 2024. The City
received an unmodified or “clean” opinion which is the desired audit result. She noted that
the City did self-report an internal control deficiency related to a transaction from 2008 that
was not properly recorded. Former Finance Director Kyle Stasica explained that a tax
increment financing (TIF) transaction from 2008 was recorded as a transfer instead of an
Interfund Loan.
WORKSHOP MINUTES
JUNE 10, 2025
PAGE THREE
Ms. Huegel presented the changes in the governmental fund balances by classification. Mayor
Zabel asked about the revenue from the local option sales tax. Ms. Huegel stated that it is
classified as “Restricted.”
Next, Ms. Huegel went over the General Fund financial position, General Fund revenues, and
General Fund expenditures, as well as the changes in financial position for the Enterprise
Funds which consist of the Water Fund, Sewer Fund, Street Lights Fund, and Surface Water
Fund. The revenues and expenses for each Enterprise Fund were explained in detail.
In response to Mayor Zabel’s question about the decreasing operating income trend line
(green), Mr. Stasica noted that the more realistic trend line is the operating income excluding
depreciation (red). He added that the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes a utility
management plan and utility study which will help increase the budgeting accuracy of these
funds. Finally, the government-wide statements were reviewed.
Regarding Schedule 1 in the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, Mayor Zabel asked
about why “total general property taxes” came in almost $350,000 under budget. Mr. Stasica
stated that because there are delinquent property tax payments, it is nearly impossible to
reflect 100% accuracy.
In response to Mayor Zabel’s question about the budgeting of the franchise fees, Mr. Stasica
said the 2024 overage was unknown, and the excess went into the Fund Balance. Ms. Volkers
noted that moving forward, any excess will go into the Street/Roadway Fund.
In reference to the total expenditures for Public Works, Mayor Zabel inquired about the fact
this number was almost $450,000 under budget. Ms. Volkers pointed out that there were less
expenses due to staffing, the hold on several projects, and a milder winter.
Mayor Zabel encouraged the Council to bring the hardcopy booklet of the Annual
Comprehensive Financial Report to the Special Workshop on Monday, June 16th.
Ms. Volkers complimented Mr. Stasica on his work to complete this audit in tandem with
LB|Carlson.
ADMINISTRATOR UPDATE
Ms. Volkers handed out a draft City Council vacancy appointment timeline, the City’s standard
employment application, and required candidate supplemental questionnaire for Council
review. It was determined that the timeline be pushed back by two weeks, with the final
appointment being made at the September 9, 2025 regular meeting. The date in which the
Council will conduct interviews with the selected applicants will be decided later this summer.
The Council requested that a more general question about public financing be used in the
supplemental questionnaire instead of a specific question about tax increment financing or
WORKSHOP MINUTES
JUNE 10, 2025
PAGE FOUR
tax abatements. The Council also requested that the language about ranked choice voting
and the option to run in the next election be removed from the supplemental questionnaire.
Ms. Volkers suggested adding a question about the required time commitment. The Council
was amenable.
COUNCIL TOPICS
Council Member Severson inquired about Council attendance at Summerfest. Mayor Zabel
stated that historically the Council Members attend the parade and a variety of the event
throughout the week, but due to personal schedules that is not always the case. This year, the
group Council photo will be taken at the parade instead of on Saturday to accommodate
differing Council Member schedules. Ms. Volkers offered to send the Summerfest schedule
of events to the Council.
Regarding the June 16, 2025 Special Workshop to discuss the 2026 budget, the Mayor
requested high-level personnel and operations information for each department by Friday,
June 13, 2025.
Council Member Morcomb asked about a timeline for the Business Retention, Expansion, and
Attraction (BREA) visits for 2026. Mr. Gitzlaff said that there will be six visits, no more than
twice per month, beginning in July.
The Council and Ms. Volkers discussed the recruitment process for the next City Administrator
given Ms. Volkers’ intent to retire in Quarter 1 of 2026.
ADJOURNMENT
The workshop was adjourned at 6:58 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Sara Ludwig, City Clerk
Agenda
AGENDA
City Council
Workshop Meeting
June 10, 2025
Hadley Conference Room
5:00 PM
Amended
5:00 PM New Willowbrooke Parks Naming
5:20 PM Review of City of Oakdale Code of Ordinances, Chapter 9, Article 18 – Cannabis and Hemp
Business Regulations
5:45 PM Review of 2024 Financial Audit
6:10 PM Administrator Update
6:20 PM Council Topics
6:50 PM Adjourn for Regular Meeting
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Andrew Gitzlaff, Community Development Director
Lori Pulkrabek, Communications Manager
Date: June 10, 2025
Subject: New Willowbrooke Parks Naming
BACKGROUND
Construction is underway for two new parks in the Willowbrooke development – Willowbrooke Park West
and Willowbrooke Park North (names are placeholders). Willowbrooke Park West will include a U-12
soccer field, an artificial turf volleyball court, four pickleball courts and concrete seating area, a combined
restroom picnic shelter building, irrigation, a picnic lawn space, a coniferous tree buffer screening along
Interstate 694, and bituminous trails. Willowbrooke Park North will include a north-south walking trail
with a boardwalk crossing, open lawn space, native prairie, and seating nodes.
Community Development and Communications staff has developed lists of potential names for the two
City parks for Council consideration that capture the character of the parks, the Willowbrooke
neighborhood, or Oakdale.
Potential Names for Willowbrooke Park West
• Pine Grove or Pine Line Park
• Willowbrooke Sports Park
• Oak Active Park
• Kick Serve Park
Potential Names for Willowbrooke Park North
• Pathways Park at Willowbrooke
• Acorn Nature Park
1
• Willowbrooke Reserve or Reserve at Willowbrooke
Council should refer to Sections 10.0 and 11.0 of City Policy MIS-019 (attached) for further guidance on
the naming of parks. The submissions received as part of the Willowbrooke Commons naming contest
conducted in early 2024 are attached for Council reference.
COUNCIL DIRECTION REQUESTED
It is requested that the City Council provide input on potential names and collectively identify names for
the two new parks.
Attachments
City Policy MIS-019: Donations to Parks; Memorials in Parks; Installation, and Maintenance; Naming of
Parks, Facilities, and Events; Gifts Made to the City
2024 Willowbrooke Commons Naming Contest Submissions, for reference
2
Standard Operating Policy
City of Oakdale
Policy Number: MIS-019
Pages: 7
Subject: Donations to Parks; Memorials in Parks; Installation, and Maintenance;
Naming of Parks, Facilities, and Events; Gifts Made to the City
Approved: 2021 Amended: 11/2021, 08/2023
1.0 General
1.1 The purpose of this policy is to establish standards and procedures for the
installation, care, and maintenance for Donations made to city parks, Gifts Made to
the City, and for Memorials purchased by members of the public to be placed in
parks. This policy does not apply to the Donation of buildings or land to the city.
1.2 The city desires to encourage Donations to its parks while at the same time manage
aesthetic impacts and mitigate ongoing maintenance costs.
1.3 The city desires to provide members of the community the opportunity to remember
or honor a loved one by purchasing a Memorial to be placed in a city park.
1.4 The city and the community share an interest in ensuring the best appearance and
aesthetic quality of its parks. Park donations and park memorials should be in
keeping with applicable master plans for the respective parks.
1.5 The city and the community share an interest in ensuring that all Donations and
Memorials remain in good repair and that short- and long-term maintenance costs
remain reasonable and do not create an undue or unknown burden to city parks
staff.
1.6 The city reserves the right to decline any Donations or Memorial if, upon review by
the city administrator, acceptance of the Donation or Memorial is determined to be
not in the best interest of the city.
1.7 This policy will apply to all Donations, Gifts, and Memorials made after its approved
date. Donations and Memorials made prior to the adoption of this policy shall be
subject to applicable sections of this policy.
2.0 Definitions
“City” means City of Oakdale, Minnesota.
“Donation” examples shall include signage, kiosks, wayfinding, public art, equipment, or
landscaping proposed and paid for by a member of the public or nonprofit organization.
“Gift” means real or personal property, including money offered for the benefit of the City.
“Memorial” examples shall include benches, trees, rocks, or engraved paver selected and paid
for by a member of the public.
3.0 Gifts and Donations Made to the City, Resolution Required
3.1 Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute § 465.03, at such times as a City employee or official
learns that a gift is offered to the City, details shall be provided to the City Administrator and to
the City Clerk so that a report may be presented to the City Council for their consideration.
3.2 At such times that the City Council accepts any Gift or Donation, the City Council must adopt a
resolution accepting the gift, in accordance with any terms prescribed by the donor and agreed
to by the City, and said resolution must receive affirmation by two-thirds of the members of the
City Council. The City may not accept gifts of religious or sectarian purposes.
4.0 Standards for Donations
4.1 Proposed donations for a park should conform to the master plan for the park. If no
plan exists, or if a plan exists but does not identify the specific park element proposed
to be donated, city staff may consider accepting the donation under these conditions:
4.1.1 Proposed donation meets a true need of the park.
4.1.2 Proposed donation does not interfere with the intended current or future use of the park.
4.1.3 Proposed donation does not require the relocation of other equipment or
infrastructure to accommodate the donation.
4.1.4 Proposed donation is of high quality to ensure a long life, stand up to general use,
and be resistant to the elements and acts of vandalism.
4.1.5 Proposed donations that will necessitate atypical maintenance, such as a perceived
difficulty in obtaining or recreating unique components or replacement parts, or
significant staff time will not be approved.
4.2 All donation proposals must include true costs such as city staff time to prepare the site, city
staff time to install the donation, materials, and associated permits.
4.3 The city has an interest in ensuring that the donor covers the full cost for the purchase and
installation, where applicable, of their donation. The city also has an interest in ensuring
that on-going maintenance costs do not negatively impact the resources available.
4.4 The donation shall be the sole property of the city; the donor shall have no legal interest in the
donation. The city may relocate the donation for any reason, including for safety,
maintenance, or redevelopment of park land. The city will make a reasonable effort to notify
donors of any significant change to the amenity; however, it is the donor’s responsibility to
keep their contact information current with the city.
5.0 Review and Approval Process for Park Donations
5.1 The parks superintendent shall manage and process all donations proposed for city parks. The
parks superintendent shall pre-determine and maintain a detailed directory of:
5.1.1 The parks in the city that allow donations,
5.1.2 The types of donation(s) allowed,
5.1.3 The total number of each type of donation allowed in each park,
5.1.4 The specific location of donation(s) allowed in each park, and
5.1.5 Where donations have been placed, and type thereof.
The initial directory shall be reviewed by the parks and recreation commission.
5.2 The donor shall present a plan to the parks superintendent detailing the purpose of the
donation as well as the proposed design, required materials, location, maintenance plan, and
anticipated lifecycle of the donation. Details shall also be provided if the donor plans to enlist
the aid of volunteers for the installation of the donation.
5.3 The parks superintendent shall determine whether typical maintenance costs for the
anticipated lifecycle would fall below or above $1,000. Typical maintenance costs are described
as those that can be achieved by parks division staff with equipment and tools in the
possession of the Public Works Department.
5.4 When typical maintenance costs will likely be at or below $1,000 for the anticipated lifecycle of
the donation, the parks superintendent shall provide a written recommendation to the public
works director/city engineer on whether or not to accept the proposed donation as follows:
5.4.1 A recommendation for approving donation requests should detail the item(s) being
donated, proposed location(s), anticipated lifecycle of the donation, and associated
maintenance costs.
5.4.2 A recommendation for denying donations requests should detail all reason(s) for the
denial.
The public works director/city engineer shall review the recommendation and present it to the
city administrator for review/approval.
5.5 When typical maintenance costs will likely be above $1,000 for the anticipated lifecycle of the
donation, the parks superintendent shall provide a written recommendation to the public works
director/city engineer on whether or not to accept the donation as follows:
5.5.1 A recommendation for approving donation requests should detail the item(s) being
donated, proposed location(s), anticipated lifecycle of the donation, and associated
maintenance costs.
5.5.2 A recommendation for denying donations requests should detail all reason(s) for the
denial.
The public works director/city engineer shall review the recommendation and present it to the
city administrator. The city administrator shall review the recommendation and present it to the
city council for review/approval.
5.6 The parks superintendent shall provide a written annual report to the city administrator of the
types and locations of donations and memorials in city parks. The city administrator shall
provide a copy of said report to the city council.
6.0 Review and Approval Process for Park Memorials
6.1 The parks superintendent shall manage and process all memorials for city parks.
6.2 The parks superintendent shall identify the cost for each type of memorial offered by the city that
includes, if appropriate, cost to the city to acquire the memorial, engraving, concrete pad,
planting, installation, and maintenance, for inclusion on the city’s fee schedule. At such times
that cost adjustments for memorials are warranted, the parks superintendent shall submit such
a request to the finance director prior to adoption of the city’s fee schedule for the next year.
6.3 The parks superintendent shall pre-determine and maintain a detailed directory of:
6.3.1 The parks in the city that allow memorials,
6.3.2 The types of memorial(s) allowed,
6.3.3 The total number of each type of memorial allowed in each park,
6.3.4 The specific location of memorial(s) allowed in each park, and
6.3.5 Where memorials have been placed, and type thereof.
The initial directory shall be reviewed by the parks and recreation commission.
6.4 The following memorials shall be offered by the city.
o Bench (Engraved)
o Tree (Species as approved by the city forester)
o Rocks (Engraved or with engraved plaques)
o Engraved Paver at the Oakdale Veterans Memorial
o Engraved Paver at the Oakdale Discovery Center
6.5 The price for memorials shall be part of the city’s fee schedule and shall include:
o Bench: From those offered by the city to include engraving, concrete pad, installation, and
maintenance.
o Tree: From species approved by the city forester, planting, maintenance.
o Rocks: Engraved or with Engraved Plaque: Rock, engraving, installation, and maintenance.
o Engraved Paver at the Oakdale Veterans Memorial: Paver, engraving, installation, and
maintenance.
o Engraved Paver at the Oakdale Discovery Center: Paver, engraving, installation, and
maintenance.
6.6 Memorials shall be the sole property of the city; the purchaser shall have no legal interest in the
memorial. The city may relocate the memorial for any reason, including for safety, maintenance,
or redevelopment of park land. The city will make a reasonable effort to notify the purchaser of
any significant changes; however, it is the purchaser’s responsibility to keep their contact
information current with the city.
6.7 Wording on a memorial bench shall be subject to the approval of the parks superintendent,
should be as brief as possible, and be limited to phrases such as: “In Loving Memory of”,
“Dedicated to”, or “In Honor of”, etc.
6.8 Decoration or adornment of memorials can interfere with routine maintenance and the
appearance of the memorial. As such, decorations and adornments will be allowed to remain in
place until such time as removed by the parks division.
6.9 The parks superintendent shall provide a written annual report to the city administrator of the
types and locations of donations and memorials in city parks. The city administrator shall provide
a copy of said report to the city council.
7.0 Donations for Multi-Year Projects or Community Memorials
7.1 When an entity offers to donate to the city a partial monetary donation over a pre-determined
and agreed upon number of years to realize the completion of a specific project, excluding
buildings, and the review and approval process is followed as documented above. If approved,
the city and the entity shall enter into a written agreement that includes (not all-inclusive):
a. Amount of donation the entity will pay to the city each year.
b. Entity to donate project to the city at completion of project.
c. Entity to release any claims of ownership at completion of project.
d. Steps to be taken if donation isn’t received as anticipated (such as cancellation of project).
7.2 At such times that the city plans to create a memorial in the community and invite members of
the public to make monetary donations to the city toward said memorial, such donations will be
returned to each donor in the event that a determination is made that the memorial project will
not proceed.
8.0 Ongoing Maintenance of Donations and Memorials
8.1 The parks superintendent shall manage the maintenance of all approved and authorized
donations and memorials placed in city parks by regular and seasonal parks staff.
9.0 Removal of Donations or Memorials
9.1 Items that are living, such as but not limited to, landscaping, flower beds, and trees, become city
property upon planting. If a tree or landscaping becomes overgrown, unkempt, diseased or dies,
the parks superintendent will call for its removal.
9.2 Items such as, but not limited to, signage, kiosks, wayfinding, public art, equipment, and
benches become city property upon installation. If an item becomes unserviceable or no longer
meets a public need at its location, the parks superintendent will call for its removal.
10.0 Naming New Parks, Facilities or Community Event After a Person
10.1 Naming of new parks, facilities, and community events in the city may honor persons who have
contributed to the betterment of the community. Generally, a naming suggestion is introduced in
recognition and appreciation of a substantial gift to the city. In some instances, the acceptance
of land donated to the city can be named by deed restriction by the donor and subject to
approval by the City Council. Naming a new park, facility, or event must not conflict with public
grant funding policies established by state and/or federal grant funding programs. In addition, a
name may be proposed based on other criteria beyond a gift if an individual has provided long-
standing or distinguished service to the community.
10.2 All viable requests relating to naming a new park, facility, or event shall be presented to the city
council. The city council has final approval and may reject any naming request. Requests
presented to the city council should include an estimate of any costs associated with naming.
10.3 The following will be considered by the city council when naming a new park, facility, or event
after a person, living or non-living:
10.3.1 One who significantly contributed to the acquisition or development of the park, facility,
or event.
10.3.2 One who provided extraordinary service to the community.
10.3.3 One who provided an extraordinary gift or contribution to the community.
10.4 Preference will be given to names of persons that constitute enduring, honorable fame to the
community. Honorable is defined as high respect; fame is defined as having great renown in the
community.
10.5 Naming of a new park, facility, or event after a non-living person should be held off until at least
one year after their passing to ensure the individual’s contributions or accomplishments will
stand the test of time and that the decision is not made on an emotional basis.
10.6 New parks, facilities, or events that may be named include: parks and open space areas, sports
facilities, recreation facilities, recreation centers, beach property, athletic fields, athletic
complexes, tennis/volleyball/basketball/pickleball courts, community centers, gazebos, meeting
rooms, and events.
10.7 The following may not be considered to be named or renamed: City owned buildings such as city
hall, council chambers, public safety (fire, police, public works) facilities, the Discovery Center,
and operational facilities such as water towers, pump stations, and well houses.
11.0 Naming or Renaming Parks
11.1 When considering naming a new park, when the name is consistent with the name of the plat, no
additional approvals are required. However, when a request is made to name a new park that is
not consistent with the name of the plat, staff shall present the suggested name(s) to the city
council. The city council has final approval and may reject any naming request.
11.2 If a request is made to rename an existing park and the park has a naming rights agreement, as
noted in Sec. 13.0, in place or other significance, staff will prepare a report to the city council
outlining the new naming request and provide details of the existing naming rights agreement or
other significance. The city council shall follow this process:
Step 1: Staff will notify the public 14 days prior to consideration before the city council as follows:
• By placing an advertisement in the city’s official newspaper,
• Posting notice on the city’s website,
• Posting notice on the city’s social media sites.
Step 2: The city council will review the proposed name, solicit input from the public, and discuss
the merits of the proposal and make a decision. If the city council chooses not to approve the
recommended name, staff will notify the requestor of the city council’s decision and the matter
will end.
12.0 Naming Facilities
12.1 Naming a new facility presents an opportunity to raise funds for the capital project. A building
may be named after an individual or group if a minimum contribution of 50 percent of the
project/fundraising goal is donated. Unnamed facilities may be named through the
establishment of an endowment equivalent to 25 percent of the determined fair market value of
the facility or complex. There may be rare exceptions to the minimum donor contribution required
as recommended by the city administrator to the city council and if approved by the city council.
12.2 An individual or group may have an opportunity to name additions, amenities, or renovations to
existing facilities. A minimum requirement is a contribution of 50 percent of the
project/fundraising goal, or alternatively, a minimum contribution of one million dollars. Portions
of a facility or complex may be named for a donor if the donation is equal to the cost of
constructing and installation of that portion of the facility or complex. Examples would be
scoreboards, individual rooms in a facility, etc. There may be rare exceptions to the minimum
donor contribution required as recommended by the city administrator to the city council and if
approved by the city council.
12.3 If a facility is in the city’s strategic plan, city staff and community groups will solicit donors on
behalf of the approved facility or amenity project. An individual or group donor may approach the
mayor, city council, or city staff to make a donation. The city administrator will discuss the terms
of the donation with the individual or group. The donor should be encouraged to give to an
approved project; however, if it involves a new project, the city council will consider it for possible
inclusion in the strategic plan. If so approved, city staff will draft an agreement between the city
and the donor for consideration by the city council.
13.0 Renaming a Facility
13.1 An individual or group wishing to change the name of an existing facility must provide a written
request with justification to the city administrator. Upon receipt of this written request, staff will
complete a report. If the name of the existing facility has no prior naming rights agreement in
place or other naming significance, then the city council will review the request. The city council
has final approval and may reject any naming request. If the existing name of the facility has
other significance, then the city council will follow the following process:
Step 1: Staff will notify the public 14 days prior to consideration before the city council as follows:
• By placing an advertisement in the city’s official newspaper,
• Posting notice on the city’s website,
• Posting notice on the city’s social media sites.
Step 2: The city council will review the proposed name and the merits of the proposal and make
a decision. Public comments will be taken. If the city council chooses not to approve the
recommended name, staff will notify the requestor of the city council’s decision and the matter
will end.
14.0 Naming Rights Agreement. Details may include:
• The amount of the donation and terms of the payment.
• Process and description of how the donors are recognized, who would pay for the recognition,
address potential logo changes or business closing, etc.
• Consent to use name / copyrighted image for sponsorship.
• A copy of all agreements must be executed by the parties and filed with the city clerk after
city council approval.
• Term of the agreement as to name.
• Consideration as to operation and maintenance.
Park Name Submissions per January 2024 Park Naming Contest
Park Name Rationale
Acorn Hills To go with the Oak theme and the hilly nature of the area.
Acorn Park A play off of Oakdale's namesake. I imagine we will have a number of Oak trees planted.
Acorn Square Oak trees produce acorns and the shape of the park is essentially square.
Adventure Oasis Park Oakdale
Arthur Stephen was the man who suggested the name Oakdale at the town's first meeting in
November of 1858. He was elected to be a Justice of the Peace for the town. I think it would
Arthur Stephen Park be fitting to have a park in Oakdale named after the man who named our city.
Arthur Stephen was the man who suggested the name Oakdale at the first town meeting in
Arthur Stephen Park 1858. Maybe putting a name like this will spur residents to look more into Oakdale's history.
Arthur Stephen is the man credited with suggesting the name for the city of Oakdale.
Returning to our roots can be a reminder of our common ties, and what brings us together as
Arthur Stephen Park a community.
"Basswood" because in the mid 1800s, early settlers found this remarkable land covered with
white and black oak, bur, basswood and elm trees. "Home" refers to all the families in the
community rearing their children and youth for good. "Home" is the foundation of unity and the
Basswood Home Park heart of progress.
Black Oak Park because it was one of the many trees found in Oakdale based from the history
Black Oak Park/Commons of Oakdale.
Bonita Park Bonita means pretty/beautiful in Spanish
I think it is going to be a beautiful park so it deserves a beautiful name that also ties in with
the Willowbrooke development. This will also help to define the area and make it easier for
Brooke Park people to locate the park.
Canopy Park The park will be surrounded by a beautiful canopy of trees.
Cansasa (Čhaŋšáša), pronounced "chahn-shah-shah," is the Lakota word for willow tree. I am
suggesting Cansasa as a way to acknowledge the Wahpekute Dakota heritage of the land we
live on, while tying into the "willow" part of "Willowbrooke." On the plus side, based on a
Cansasa Park cursory Google Map search, there don't seem to be any other Cansasa Parks in Minnesota.
Cardigan Park Cozy and cute
Cars
During the trail of tears many of the Cherokee people were pushed up to Mn including my
Cherokee Park family. It’s an amazing way to continue to honor some original history
Cyphers Park First known settler of Oakdale was Bernard Cyphers
Eagle's are fit and live in trees. We are a Tree Community and this is a fitness park. And
Eagle's Edge Park Oakdale has Eagles!
The Eberhard family has a long-standing history in Oakdale. From the farm that still functions
with the cows we all love to slow down to see on Stillwater Blvd. to building some of the first
homes in Oakdale on Stillwater Way North, they have made and continue to make their
positive mark on the community. "Grandma Rosie" Eberhard read to students at Eagle Point
Elementary for years. Her son, Larry, and his wife, Vickey Eberhard have been a welcoming
Eberhard Park and active presence in the Oakdale community for as long as I have lived here andbeyond.
Eberlein Park A unique, cute, yet sophisticated name just like the neighborhood is.
1
Park Name Submissions per January 2024 Park Naming Contest
Park Name Rationale
Evelina means light or life. Oakdale is a city where many people want to come live in and is a
Evelina Park beacon of light for many people. This park would represent that meaning for the people.
Funfare Square Suggestive of a nice place to spend some time with the family.
The park name I would like to suggest is "Golden Leaf Park." Unfortunately, I cannot take
credit for coming up with the "golden" part of the park name. My brother, Brett, made the
observation that this new park is planting its roots in the year of Oakdale's 50th birthday (if
you will), since Oakdale was officially designated as a city in 1974. My brother pointed out
that "gold" is the color associated with 50th birthdays. After brainstorming several ideas, I
came up with "Golden Leaf Park." While considering words to go along with "gold/golden," I
thought of the word "leaf," because Oakdale is filled with beautiful trees whose foliage
changes colors throughout the seasons - gold being one of them. "Golden Leaf Park"
represents Oakdale's beautiful scenery, while celebrating its historical significance of being a
Golden Leaf Park city for 50.
The park is opening in 2024, which is the same year Oakdale turns 50. Since gold is
representative of turning 50, we decided on “Golden”. Since the park is located in the
Willowbrooke neighborhood, we wanted to tie in the name of the neighborhood with the name
Goldenbrooke Park of the park, hence the word “brooke."
Oakdale was named for a grove of oak trees near the original town site and its simple and
Grove Park fitting.
Emphasizing the harmonious blend of water, greenery, and walking trails, this name captures
the essence of a peaceful retreat, encouraging residents to connect with nature in the heart of
Harmony Meadows Park Oakdale
A nod to the park being right off of Helmo, all the nearby residential streets starting with 'H'
Helmo Harmony Park and what we want the park to be and represent - a harmonious space.
Henna indicating street you park on. Heights for the elevation of the space including over the
wetlands/pond. Play Park because it is a park space for all ages to play with and connect with
one another. We need more play in our world and more connections among our diverse and
Henna Heights Play Park growing community
It would be for all the first responders, all of the workers, and all the volunteers that make our
Heroes Park city great!
Isaac Higbee was the Deputy Surveyor that laid out what would become Oakdale, all the way
back in November 1847. Many of Higbee’s survey lines remain today, covered by large roads
Higbee Park (Century Ave, 10 th Street, I-94, to name a few
Ideal Commons Ideal Commons because it’s near the street and it will become the ideal/perfect hang out.
This would be a reference to the former Imation Corporation site just adjacent to
Willowbrooke, now 4Front Technology. The name Imation is a shortened version of the word
Imagination, and the company had a presence at the Willowbrooke site for many of Oakdale’s
Imagination Park early years
After the old 3M company Imation that sites just ti the south. Based on the Latin words
informare, meaning information, and imaginari, or imagination [in fact, they are verbs and
Imagination Park translate more accurately as “to inform” and “to imagine.”
2
Park Name Submissions per January 2024 Park Naming Contest
Park Name Rationale
Located on land previously owned by 3M, this park is near the recent Imation building. (Also,
though not exactly within the correct alphabetical order, the nearby streets are in the "H" and
"I" section of town.) A unique and inclusive park for all ages and abilities. Imagine all of the fun
Imagination Park and new friends you can make at this new park!
Jane and Glasgow were among the earliest Black residents of what is now Minnesota.
Enslaved by Zachary Taylor, the future US president, they lived with him and his White family
at Fort Snelling while he was its commandant, 1828–29. They did not live in Oakdale, which
Jane and Glasgow Park did not yet exist.
Oakbrooke Park Oakdale and Willlowbrooke. Also there are some oak trees surronunding the park.
When I saw the picture of the new park on the contest announcement, it immediately
Oasis1 reminded me of an oasis.
Otuhu Park Dakota for Oak, a recognition of the indigenous people.
The park is located in between the winding trails along the prairie wetlands in the Willowbrook
Prairie Trails Park neighborhood.
A fellow neighbor, former Mayor Reinke has been an integral part of the history of the
development of Oakdale. His recent time as mayor and presence on the city council has
helped this development become realized. I think there's no name more fitting at this time
Reinke Park than to name it after Paul
Stable hand as mayor - great council an commission member before that. Instrumental in the
Reinke Park development taking place.
Stephen Park Named for Arthur Stephen who named Oakdale in 1858.
Stephen Park Arthur Stephen is credited with coming up with the name Oakdale back in 1898.
Stephen's Park Named after Arthur Stephen (1830-1911): the man who named Oakdale.
The sunset is always so beautiful in this area, people are always stopping to take pictures of it
Sunset Park when walking.
Target Park
Whimsy Whimsy means playfully quaint or fanciful. It is the feeling you get when
something, like a playground, stirs your inner child and your imagination.
Paying homage to Willoughby & Powers stage coaches who connected St. Paul to Stillwater
Willoughby Park making a well known pit stop at the Halfway House in Oakdale.
Willow
Willow Fit Park It's in Willow Brooke neighborhood and it's a fitness park.
Willow Lake Park Nod to the Willowbrooke development area and Lake Elmo right across the road.
Willow Oak Commons because took part of the neighborhood name and the trees that once
Willow Oak Commons were there.
Willow Oaks Park
Willow Park
Willowactive Park Neighborhood is Willowbrooke and it's meant to be an active park.
The neighborhood is Willowbrooke. And I'm hoping that will mean some willows around those
Willowbreeze Park water catchments.
It pays homage to the neighborhood and would be helpful in identifying the neighborhood in
Willowbrooke Park which the park is located.
Willowbrooke Park Self-explanatory
Willowbrooke Park Suits the development
Willowbrooke Park
3
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Max Lohse, Community Development Specialist
Date: June 10, 2025
Subject: Review of City of Oakdale Code of Ordinances, Chapter 9, Article 18 – Cannabis and
Hemp Business Regulations
BACKGROUND
At the May 27, 2025, City Council Workshop, it was requested that staff add a discussion on the Cannabis
and Hemp Regulations section of the City Code (City of Oakdale Code of Ordinances, Chapter 9, Article
18) to a future Council Workshop with an emphasis on setback regulations for schools. Additionally, the
City Attorney’s Office is proposing minor adjustments to the ordinance, including improved clarity for
setback measurements, removal of tribal exemptions, and minor changes to license terminology to
comply with recent statutory updates.
Setback Regulations
Minnesota Statutes 342.13 permits cities to adopt setback regulations that prohibit cannabis businesses
from operating within a specified distance of certain business types. In particular, cities may adopt a
maximum setback distance of 1,000 ft from schools, and 500 ft from day cares, residential treatment
facilities, or park features oriented towards minors (playground, athletic field, etc.). The current ordinance
for the City of Oakdale utilizes the maximum setback allowed by Minnesota Statutes 342.13.
Below is a comparison of cannabis setbacks adopted by peer communities:
City Adopted Setbacks
Oakdale 1,000 ft from schools; 500 ft from day cares, treatment facilities, and park features
Cottage Grove 1,000 ft from schools; 500 ft from day cares, treatment facilities, and park features
Roseville 500 ft from treatment facilities; 100 ft from schools and day cares
Stillwater 1,000 ft from parks and schools
White Bear Lake 1,000 ft from schools; 500 ft from day cares, treatment facilities, and park features
Woodbury 1,000 ft from schools; 500 ft from day cares, treatment facilities, and park features
COUNCIL DIRECTION REQUESTED
It is requested that the Council discuss Chapter 9, Article 18, and state their intent regarding whether
setback requirements from schools should be modified from 1,000 ft to 500 ft.
Attachments
Map – Cannabis Setbacks (Existing)
Map – Cannabis Setbacks (500 ft Buffer for Schools)
Proposed Changes to City of Oakdale Code of Ordinances, Chapter 9, Article 18 – Cannabis and Hemp
Regulations
Existing Cannabis Setbacks
Legend
General Industrial Parcels -
Cultivation Permitted
Commercial PUD Parcels -
Retail Likely Permitted
Commercial Parcels - Retail
Not Permitted
Commercial Parcels - Retail
Permitted
Playground or Athletic Field -
500 ft Buffer
Schools - 1000 ft Buffer
Child Care Centers - 500 ft
Buffer
Treatment Centers - 500 ft
Buffer
Disclaimer
This map is intended to visualize which
commercial and industrial parcels may be eligible
for cannabis-related businesses with a buffer
required from all schools, licensed child care
centers, public playgrounds, public athletic fields,
and treatment centers. All parcel calculations are
approximate and not intended as a siting tool for
prospective businesses. If an applicant presents
staff with a potential location for a cannabis
business, staff will conduct a more detailed,
parcel-level analysis of eligibility.
¯ 0 0.5 1 2 Miles
Maxar
Cannabis Setbacks (500 ft Option)
Legend
General Industrial Parcels -
Cultivation Permitted
Commercial PUD Parcels -
Retail Likely Permitted
Commercial Parcels - Retail
Not Permitted
Commercial Parcels - Retail
Permitted
Playground or Athletic Field -
500 ft Buffer
Child Care Centers - 500 ft
Buffer
Treatment Centers - 500 ft
Buffer
Schools - 500 ft Buffer
Disclaimer
This map is intended to visualize which
commercial and industrial parcels may be eligible
for cannabis-related businesses if a buffer was
required from all schools, licensed child care
centers, public playgrounds, public athletic fields,
and treatment centers. All parcel calculations are
approximate and not intended as a siting tool for
prospective businesses. If a buffer requirement
for cannabis businesses is approved by the City
Council, staff would conduct a more detailed,
parcel-level analysis of eligibility for future
cannabis business candidates.
¯ 0 0.5 1 2 Miles
Maxar
CITY OF OAKDALE
ORDINANCE NO. XXX
AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES FOR THE CITY OF OAKDALE, CHAPTER 9, ARTICLE
18 RELATED TO LOCATION REQUIREMENTS AND UPDATING TERMINOLOGY
The City Council of the City of Oakdale ordains:
Section 1. The Oakdale Code of Ordinances, Chapter 9, Article 18, Section 9-185
is amended as follows:
Sec. 9-185 PROHIBITED LOCATION.
No cannabis business may be located within one thousand (1,000)five hundred (500) feet of
a school, or five hundred (500) feet of a licensed day care, park feature, or a residential
treatment facility, as measured from the closest point of the property line where the Cannabis
Business is proposed to be located to the closest point of the property line of the school,
licensed day care, park feature, or residential treatment facility.
Section 2. The Oakdale Code of Ordinances, Chapter 9, Article 18, Section 9-187
is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 9-187 CANNABIS RETAILER REGISTRATION LIMITS.
(a) Cap on number of cannabis retailer registrations:
(1) The city will issue one registration per twelve thousand five hundred (12,500)
residents in the city, except that the city will not issue any registrations if there is
one registration per twelve thousand five hundred (12,500) residents in
Washington County.
(2) The number of registrations available will be calculated by dividing the state
demographer’s estimate of the city’s population.
(3) The city will update the number of registrations available based on the most recent
data available from the state demographer on January 1 and June 1 each year.
(4) The number of registrations in the county will be based on the number of
registrations in the county on the day the application is received.
(5) If the number of registrations available within the city decreases based on the
county reaching the one per twelve thousand five hundred 12,500 threshold or the
city’s population decreases below a previous threshold, businesses with current
registrations will be allowed to maintain and renew their registrations but no new
registration will be issued.
(6) Registrations issued to businesses with a preliminary license approval preapproval
will count toward the city’s registration limit.
1
(b) The following businesses are not subject to the cap on registration under Paragraph
A above:
(1) Businesses operating under a tribal compact entered into under Minnesota
Statutes, Section 3.9224 or 3.9228;
(2) Tribally issued licenses and registrations;
(3)(1) Lower-Potency Hemp Retailer;
(4)(2) Municipal cannabis store; and
(5)(3) Medical cannabis combination businesses.
Section 3. The Oakdale Code of Ordinances, Chapter 9, Article 18, Section 9-189
is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 9-189 APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION.
All applicants for initial registration or renewal registration must submit a registration
application or renewal form provided by the city. The form may be amended from time to time
by the City Administrator, but must include or be accompanied by:
(a) Name of the property owner;
(b) Name and date of birth of the applicant;
(c) Address and parcel ID for the property for which the registration is sought;
(d) Certification that the applicant complies with the requirements of this article;
(e) Fee Required. At the time of initial application, and prior to the city’s consideration of
any renewal application, each cannabis retailer must pay, as established in the city’s
fee schedule, the following fees:
(1) At the time of initial registration:
a. An initial registration fee. The initial registration fee will pay for the
costs of registration and the cost of the first year of operation.
b. The renewal fee for the second year of operation.
(2) At the time of the first annual renewal (prior to the second year of operation),
no fee will be due.
2
(3) At the time of the second annual renewal, and each year thereafter, the renewal
fee must be paid prior to the city issuing any renewal registration.
(4) Initial registration fees and renewal registration fees are nonrefundable.
(f) A copy of a valid state license or written notice of OCM preliminary license approval
preapproval;
(g) Proof of taxes, assessments, utility charges, or other financial claims of the city and
state are current.
Section 4. Incorporation. City staff is authorized and directed to update the table of contents,
reformat this ordinance, and to make such other non-substantive changes as are necessary
to incorporate the amendments adopted by this Ordinance into the City of Oakdale Code of
Ordinances.
Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on _________,
after its adoption and publication, as provided by law.
Voting For: Mayor Zabel, Council Members Moore, Morcomb, and
Severson;
Voting Against: None.
Adopted this ___ day of ________, 2025 by the Oakdale City Council.
_____________________________________
Kevin Zabel, Mayor
Attest:
___________________________________
Sara Ludwig, City Clerk
Posted:
Published:
3
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Kyle Stasica, Finance Director
Kristina Handt, Interim Finance Director
Date: June 10, 2025
Subject: Review of 2024 Financial Audit
BACKGROUND
Minnesota Statutes require that cities issue an annual financial report prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and audited in accordance with those principles
by a firm of licensed certified public accountants or the Office of the State Auditor.
This report consists of management’s representations concerning the finances of the City.
Consequently, management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of all of
the financial information presented in this report.
The City of Oakdale’s financial statements have been audited by LB Carlson, a firm of licensed
certified public accountants. The goal of the independent audit was to provide reasonable
assurance that the financial statements of the City for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024
are free of material misstatement. The independent audit involved examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements; assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management; and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. The independent audit has issued an unmodified (“clean”)
opinion on the City of Oakdale’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024.
The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for
Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City for its Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the
year ended December 31, 2023. This was the 34th consecutive year that the City has achieved this
prestigious award. To be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, the City published an easily readable
and efficiently organized report. Staff believes this year’s report will satisfy the requirements as well,
and will submit the finished Annual Comprehensive Financial Report to the GFOA for consideration.
Jackie Huegel, Principal, from LB Carlson will present an overview of the audit process and results.
There is no action required of the City Council as this review is informational only.
The Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for fiscal year ending December 31, 2024 can be
found under the “City Budget & Financial Reports” on the City’s Finance Department webpage.
The following attachments will be provided to Council under separate cover:
• Management Report
• Special Purpose Audit Report
Attachment
Presentation Slides
City of Oakdale, Minnesota
Audit Report for Year Ended December 31, 2024
Presented by: Jaclyn M. Huegel, CPA
Principal
952-224-1638 jhuegel@lbcarlson.com
AUDITOR’S ROLE
• Fairly presented in accordance with
Opinions on Financial accounting principles generally
Statements accepted in the United States of
America
• Financial Statement Audit
Internal Controls and • MN Legal Compliance Audit
Compliance
1
AUDIT RESULTS
Basic Financial • Unmodified “Clean” Opinions
Statements
Internal Control and • One Internal Control Deficiency
Compliance – – 2024-001 Prior Period Adjustment
Financial Audit
AUDIT RESULTS
• No findings for 2024
MN Legal Compliance
2
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
GENERAL FUND FINANCIAL POSITION
3
GENERAL FUND REVENUE
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
4
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN NET POSITION
WATER FUND
5
SEWER FUND
STREET LIGHTS FUND
6
SURFACE WATER FUND
GOVERNMENT-WIDE STATEMENTS
7
Get email alerts for Oakdale
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.