Traffic Safety Advisory Committee

**LOCATION OF MEETING ** CITY OF ORINDA SARGE LITTLEHALE 22 ORINDA WAY COMMUNITY ROOM ORINDA, CA 94563 22 ORINDA WAY (925) 253-4200 TRAFFIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2019 7:00 P.M. A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Traffic Safety Advisory Committee (TSAC) Meeting Minutes October 21, 2019 Recommendation: Approval D. Public Forum The Public Forum provides an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item within the jurisdiction of the Committee that does not appear on the agenda. A speaker has the option of addressing an item listed on the agenda if the speaker will not be present when that item is taken up. Public comment is generally limited to 3 minutes per speaker. If you would like to speak during the Public Forum, or on any item listed on the agenda, you are invited to submit a Speaker Card. The optional information you provide on the Speaker Card is made available for public inspection upon request and is subject to disclosure. You will be permitted to speak even if you decline to submit a Speaker Card. E. Discussion – Safe Driving Education for School Zones F. Traffic Calming Updates and Actions 1. Briefing from Police Chief - SLOW DOWN ORINDA/Traffic Citations Report 2. Traffic Calming Requests a. Glorietta Blvd and #1 Virginia Drive – Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) Crosswalk – Recommend (ON HOLD) 3. Accessibility Issues 4. Proposed Prioritization of Current Traffic Calming Requests: 1) Hillcrest Drive; 2) Lost Valley Drive/Valley View Drive; All Other Requests on Hold G. Staff Report 1. Update – Current Balance of Traffic Calming Improvements Program FY 2020 expenditures $244.69 to date; $40,000 budget = remaining balance $39,755.31 2. Update - Hillcrest Drive (between Martha Road and Overhill Road) – Speed Cushion Installation and Radar Speed Sign Installation (2nd Neighborhood Action Team Meeting To Be Scheduled) 3. Update – Rheem Boulevard at Zander Drive – 3-Way Stop Sign (Design and Installation Phase) 4. Postponed – Donald Drive – Signage and Speed Cushion Installation (ON HOLD) – Follow-Up/Possibly Eliminate 5. Postponed – East Altarinda Road – Signage Request (ON HOLD) – Eliminate/Consider as Future CIP Project 6. Postponed – Northwood Drive – Speed Cushion Request (ON HOLD) – Follow-Up/Possibly Eliminate 7. Postponed – Lost Valley Drive/Valley View Drive – Signage/Striping/Radar Feedback Request 8. Postponed – Underhill Road – Speed Cushion Request (ON HOLD) 9. Postponed – Dalewood Drive – Speed Cushion Request (ON HOLD) 10. Postponed – Davis Road – Speed Cushion Request (ON HOLD) H. Matters Initiated Consideration of matters a Committeemember wishes to initiate for placement on a future TSAC agenda. I. Adjournment I, Sheri Marie Smith, City Clerk, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that this agenda has been posted at least 72 hours in advance at the Orinda City Offices. Additional copies are available at the Orinda Library, the Orinda Community Center, and on the City’s website at www.cityoforinda.org _______________________ Sheri Marie Smith, City Clerk ~ Accessible Public Meetings ~ The City of Orinda will provide special assistance for individuals with disabilities to participate in public meetings upon advance notice. If you need auxiliary hearing aid or sign language assistance at least two (2) working days advanced notice is necessary. Please contact the City Clerk’s Office, 22 Orinda Way, Orinda, CA 94563 or 925.253.4220 or ssmith@cityoforinda.org with the following information: Name, mailing address, phone number and type of assistance requested.  CITY OF ORINDA TRAFFIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES October 21, 2019 A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TRAFFIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TSAC) WAS HELD ON THE ABOVE DATE IN THE SARGE LITTLEHALE COMMUNITY ROOM, 22 ORINDA WAY, ORINDA, CALIFORNIA. A. CALL TO ORDER Chair Bisesto called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. B. ROLL CALL COMMITTEEMEMBERS: Laura Bisesto, Travis Blaschek-Miller (absent, excused), Stuart House, Mark Roberts, Steve Schnier City Staff: Director of Public Works and Engineering Services Larry Theis, Assistant Engineer Kevin McCourt C. TRAFFIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES September 16, 2019 MOTION: By Committeemember Roberts, seconded by Committeemember House, to approve the TSAC Meeting Minutes of September 16, 2019. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. D. PUBLIC FORUM - None E. DISCUSSION – TRAFFIC CONTROL – INTERSECTION OF DON GABRIEL WAY/LOST VALLEY DRIVE/ VALLEY VIEW DRIVE Sandy Roadcap, Orinda resident, distributed information from STALKER, the Orinda Police Department radar traffic device; she noted the following in support of her request for installation of a 3-way Stop sign at the intersection of Don Gabriel Way, Lost Valley Drive, and Valley View Drive: 1. The intersection includes Valley View Drive, a road designated as a Collector and Don Gabriel Way, a School Route; other intersections similar in configuration which are located in Orinda are Stop controlled and include crosswalks. 2. 70% of households were contacted, with 96% of those in favor of a 3-way Stop. 3. Speed data collected by STALKER showed vehicles in the area speeding excessively. 4. 78% of vehicles are cutting the corner at the intersection coming down Lost Valley Drive turning onto Don Gabriel Way. 5. There have been accidents at the intersection. 1 DRAFT October 21, 2019 Barbie Starrett, Orinda resident, added that the Neighborhood Action Team (NAT) had created the informational packet, which the Committeemembers were encouraged to read; the NAT is looking forward to working with the TSAC. Chair Bisesto commented that the matter seems serious and noted that the Committee is concerned about creating safe routes to school; a 3-way Stop is a serious implementation and would change traffic patterns; however, it could can add safety if implemented correctly; although it is outside of the scope of the TSAC to approve Stop signs, the TSAC could fund a study. Committeemember Roberts noted that this intersection had been brought to the TSAC in the past; the NAT has done a good job of providing information; a Stop sign requires City Council action, although this location may seem like a good candidate for some type of control. Director Theis advised that there are Federal guidelines found in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) which apply to the installation of Stop signs; a warrant analysis could be completed by a traffic consultant, which would include the volume of traffic, turning movements, and accident history as part of the review; recently, limited sight distance at Rheem Boulevard and Zander Drive created by a crest in the roadway warranted a Stop sign; due to the traffic and number of accidents, the warrant analysis would likely not come back with a recommendation for a Stop sign; residents at Lost Valley Drive would be most affected; the NAT may want to consider other traffic calming measures. Donna Johnke, Orinda resident, stated that they had submitted a Traffic Calming Request, however due to their position in the queue the NAT wanted to try to deal directly with the Engineering Department to see if they could get something accomplished quicker as there are many children in the neighborhood as well as the Xenophon Therapeutic Riding School; traffic has increased with PG&E activity and construction activity with the replacement of the sewer line in the area; as a 16 year old she had witnessed a classmate get hit and killed which may have been prevented by traffic control and she questioned whether waiting for something catastrophic to happen before acting was wise. Director Theis stated that the City Council could install a Stop sign without meeting the MUTCD guidelines; however, vehicles may start ignoring the control if unwarranted, causing potentially more rear end collisions which could open the City to liabilities; however, the number of pedestrian crossings may meet the warrant analysis. Jean Johnstone, associated with the Xenophon Therapeutic Riding Center, noted Page 5 of the handout which showed approximate pedestrian numbers - over 50 children ride and bring their family; 30 or so veterans, patients, and adults with disabilities with families and caregivers; 191 volunteers throughout the week, and 21 staff members; the parking on the Center side of Don Gabriel Way is mainly designated for disabled parking so many vehicles park across the street. 2 DRAFT October 21, 2019 Chair Bisesto noted that speed cushions are a traffic calming device that physically slows vehicles and may accomplish the same outcome; she questioned whether the other Committeemembers would like to elevate this as a higher priority because this involves a school. Ms. Johnke confirmed that they would be open to speed cushion installation. Director Theis added that this would be easier to implement as PG&E is the primary neighbor; speed cushions require a unanimous vote of neighbors within 40’ of a speed cushion; the NAT should contact the affected neighborhood to determine whether they would support speed cushion installation. Ms. Johnke added that the 25 MPH signs are hidden by vegetation and difficult to see. Director Theis noted that Valley View Drive is a Collector which requires a speed survey to set a speed limit; staff would research the survey and also trim the vegetation at the noted lcoation. Committeemember House thanked the neighborhood for collecting the impressive amount of comprehensive data and supported their efforts. Director Theis stated that staff would look at the Traffic Calming Requests prioritization and give a proper timeline based upon the relation to schools. Ms. Johnke inquired what the next step would be for the NAT. Director Theis stated that they could contact the Valley View Drive neighborhood to measure the desire for particular traffic calming measures. Ms. Johnke pointed out the signatures on the current Traffic Calming Request with addresses from Valley View Drive. Committeemember House mentioned that this was for Stop signs and not necessarily speed cushions. Ms. Johnke advised that feedback from the neighbors was positive for other calming measures as well. MOTION: By Chair Bisesto, seconded by Committeemember Roberts, to review speed cushions and a Stop warrant analysis for the Don Gabriel Way/Lost Valley Drive/Valley View Drive intersection. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Ms. Starrett asked what the next step should be for the neighborhood. Director Theis suggested that they determine which traffic calming measure would be supported. This item was continued to a future TSAC meeting. 3 DRAFT October 21, 2019 F. DISCUSSION - SAFE DRIVING EDUCATION FOR SCHOOL ZONES Committeemember House stated that parents of school children have coordinated meetings and Committeemember House is advocating for a “Walking School Bus” which could be sponsored by Safe Routes to Schools funding; a Walking School Bus is a group of schoolchildren who are walked to school, chaperoned by at least two adults on a set route in a similar way a school bus would drive them to school; he questioned whether the TSAC could potentially fund it, though there are also other funds available; Glorietta Boulevard would be a good candidate with the new walkway; Del Rey Elementary School, Glorietta Elementary School, and Sleepy Hollow Elementary School would be good candidates for the Walking School Bus; children walking to Orinda Intermediate School may be past the age which this would be effective. The Police Chief could be consulted to see if the Traffic Officer would be able to make rotations to specific areas in need; parents could be informed on safe driving in school zones through the newsletter. This item was continued to the next TSAC meeting. G. DISCUSSION - TRANSPORATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) GRANT APPLICATION Assistant Engineer McCourt advised that it would be helpful to staff for the TSAC to choose, either tonight or by the next meeting at the latest, which project to recommend; Nick Waranoff, Orinda resident, had forwarded an e-mail urging the TSAC to choose the highly used, multi-modal Overcrossing at the end of Orinda Way for improved maintenance and had stated that this is a legal obligation which the City has under a maintenance agreement with Caltrans. Committeemember Roberts asked for clarification regarding was not being maintained. Director Theis replied that the Overcrossing structure has flaking and mismatched paint; the City has yet to add the project to the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP); the project should include sandblasting prior to re-painting. Chair Bisesto noted that, while she was not opposed to the project, it may not be as appropriate for the TDA grant as the other projects. Committeemember Schnier mentioned that the surface of the Overcrossing may also be uneven; he and his family and neighbors had painted the bridge, although it was not sandblasted; while the project has merit, the Moraga Way Pathway was his preference. Assistant Engineer McCourt distributed a map of the Del Rey School district boundary and a map which showed the potential distances for the Moraga Way Pathway project boundary as requested by Chair Bisesto. Director Theis added that it would be helpful to staff if the TSAC could recommend alternative projects for the TDA grant. Chair Bisesto stated that Ivy Drive is approximately 0.5 mile from the current pathway that ends at El Camino Moraga and may be a good distance to apply for a study. 4 DRAFT October 21, 2019 Assistant Engineer McCourt stated that the Glorietta Pathway project preliminary study cost was $37,000 for 0.26 miles of pathway. Director Theis advised that the selection Committee typically funds projects to be built, but the City Council could decide to supplement City funds; the highest TDA grants usually range from $100,000 - $200,000. Committeemember House questioned whether there could be any County funds for this project from Safe Routes to School. Director Theis mentioned that the CCTA Safe Routes to School grant is probably two or three years out before the application period will be open. Chair Bisesto noted that the Ivy Drive Walkway was another project that had merit, however the fronting properties had previously rejected a sidewalk, so it may not be a good candidate at this time. Director Theis mentioned that another option would be for the pathway to start from downtown instead of at the schools. Chair Bisesto remarked that the schools are more important and a pathway could potentially reduce traffic congestion. Comitteemember House stated that he supports the Moraga Way Pathway Project Committeemember Roberts admitted that he was initially resistant to the Moraga Way Pathway but believes it could be completed in palatable portions; he supported the idea of increasing pedestrian and bicycle safety along Moraga Way; the Moraga Way Pathway has the potential to do the most good for the most residents. Director Theis advised that the Moraga Way Pathway Project may not receive sufficient funding for the project to extend all the way to Ivy Drive. Staff previously received complaints that residents were not informed of the projects around their properties; Councilmember Fay had supported a pedestrian downtown project during the previous TDA grant application. Committeemember House mentioned that he was unfamiliar with most of the projects; he supported extending the pathway on Glorietta Boulevard to Moraga Way. Assistant Engineer McCourt mentioned that the Brookwood Road Pathway Project, which is on the CIP Top 10 list, was requested at the TSAC earlier this year by Mary Gilles, Orinda resident; the Valley View Drive/Lost Valley Drive neighborhood is adjacent to Don Gabriel Way, which also has a project on the CIP Top 10 list. MOTION: By Chair Bisesto, seconded by Committeemember Schnier, to recommend the Moraga Way Pathway to the City Council for the FY 2020 TDA Grant Application. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. 5 DRAFT October 21, 2019  Committeemember Schnier asked about the Camino Pablo Walkway Rehabilitation Project vs. the Moraga Way Pathway; the Camino Pablo Walkway Rehabilitation was prioritized on the CIP Top 10 list. Commiteemember Roberts stated that, in consideration of Coumcilmember Fay’s comments in support of a downtown pedestrian project, he would choose the Brookwood Road Walkway as a backup. Committeemember House asked how the CIP Top 10 priority list was created. Director Theis stated that staff had recommended the priority and the City Council had approved the list. Committemember House questioned why the Estabueno Drive/Lavenida Drive Walkway project ranked second on the list, as it was expensive and seemed to presently offer a safe access point to Del Rey Elementary School. Director Theis stated that this was ranked high for the Ivy Drive students who would use this for access; the project started as a traffic calming request, but would have eliminated on-street parking spaces. MOTION: By Committeemember House, seconded by Chair Bisesto, to recommend to the City Council the Brookwood Road Walkway and the Camino Pablo Pathway Rehabilitation Project as alternative projects for the FY 2020 TDA Grant Application. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. H. INPUT AND SUGGESTIONS ON FUTURE COMBINED TSAC AND CIOC – RENAMED POSSIBLY PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION Director Theis explained that last month the City Council had officially reduced the TSAC to a five member committee due to recruitment issues; the City Council also discussed combining the Citizens’ Infrastructure Oversight Commission and the TSAC; the CIOC primarily oversees infrastructure, such as the pavement rehabilitation projects, as well as the paving bond measure funds and drainage; the CIOC is a seven member committee with Jud Hammon as the current Chair; historically there has been little overlap between the CIOC and the TSAC; if they were to be combined, the thought initially is that no serving member would be eliminated – the new Commission would start off as a 12 member Commission and then as members leave, those vacancies would not be filled. The CIOC meeting to discuss the possible combination was postponed due to the most recent public safety power shutoff; the City Council has not made a decision and have requested input from both the CIOC and the TSAC prior to further discussion. Committeemember Schnier asked whether the CIOC has received more applicants for the Commission than the TSAC and whether the combined Commission would then be more interested in what has been historically CIOC items. Director Theis replied that the CIOC had received more applications; the CIOC and the TSAC have had different priorities. 6 DRAFT October 21, 2019  Chair Bisesto stated that TSAC was more of a forum for residents; there would be a lack of overlap and a public forum in the CIOC; while there may be some benefit to solve traffic issues while roads are being paved, the public would lose an outlet to voice their issues. Committeemember Roberts did not support combining the TSAC with the CIOC due to the notable differences; the City Council may be looking for a more efficient way of accomplishing things, but there would be negative effects. Committeemember House concurred. Committeemeber Schnier questioned the benefit of combining the CIOC and the TSAC but suggested that the City Council may have a good reason; the CIOC provides less opportunity for public input; if it were to be decided to combine the TSAC with the CIOC, he would likely step down. Committeemember Roberts noted that he also would likely step down. Chair Bisesto stated that she was not opposed to decreasing bureaucracy, however, combining the TSAC with the CIOC would not lead to better serving the public. Director Theis advised that in the long term, a combination of the TSAC and the CIOC may have a different perspective. Committemember House stated that the mission of the CIOC and the TSAC are very different; the TSAC is more responsive to concerns about specific problems, while the CIOC is concerned with planning and the economics of maintaining streets. Committemeber Schnier commented that the TSAC brings together competing groups and attempts to have residents come to a consensus. Director Theis advised that the item would be brought to the City Council in November and he would convey their comments. I. TRAFFIC CALMING UPDATES AND ACTIONS 1. Briefing from Police Chief – SLOW DOWN ORINDA/Traffic Citations Report No report Committeemember House requested that the new Traffic Officer be invited to the next TSAC meeting. Chair Bisesto added that an invitation should also be extended to Police Chief Cook for an upcoming TSAC meeting. 2. Traffic Calming Requests – None 7 DRAFT October 21, 2019  Assistant Engineer McCourt advised that a new Traffic Calming Request has been received for Glorietta Boulevard and #1 Virginia Drive requesting a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) crosswalk; it will be agendized for the next TSAC meeting. 3. Accessibility Issues - None J. STAFF REPORT 1. Update – Current Balance of Traffic Calming Improvements Program FY 2020 expenditures $244.69 to date; $40,000 budget = remaining balance $39,755.31 Assistant Engineer McCourt noted that there is no change at this time. 2. Update – Rheem Boulevard – Road Narrowing/Re-Striping (Between Glorietta Boulevard and past 77 Rheem Boulevard) Assistant Engineer McCourt advised that Rheem Boulevard would be paved within the next three years; the TSAC was requested to make an official motion on whether to hold re-striping in abeyance until that time. MOTION: By Committeemember House, seconded by Committeemember Roberts, to re-stripe and narrow the travel lane of Rheem Boulevard during the next repaving of the street. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. 3. Update - Hillcrest Drive (between Martha Road and Overhill Road) – Speed Cushion Installation and Radar Speed Sign Installation Assistant Engineer McCourt advised that he contacted the NAT; a traffic calming plan was provided and a second meeting will be scheduled. 4. Update – Rheem Boulevard at Zander Drive – 3-Way Stop Sign Assistant Engineer McCourt advised that installation of the signage and the striping will likely be completed in October or November. 5. Postponed - Donald Drive – Signage and Speed Cushion Installation (ON HOLD) No update. 6. Postponed – East Altarinda Road– Signage Request (ON HOLD) No update. 7. Postponed – Northwood Drive – Speed Cushion Request (ON HOLD) No update. 8. Postponed – Lost Valley Drive – Signage/Striping/Radar Feedback Request (ON HOLD) No update. 9. Postponed – Underhill Road – Speed Cushion Request (ON HOLD) 8 DRAFT October 21, 2019  10. Postponed – Dalewood Drive – Speed Cushion Request (ON HOLD) 11. Postponed – Davis Road – Speed Cushion Request (ON HOLD) K. MATTERS INITIATED Items for the next TSAC agenda:  Briefing from Police Chief - SLOW DOWN ORINDA/Traffic Citations Report  Traffic Calming Requests  Discussion – Safe Driving Education for School Zones  Accessibility Issues  Staff Report ◦ Updates L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: By Committeemember Schnier, seconded by Comitteemember House, to adjourn the meeting at 8:37 p.m. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The next Regular Meeting of the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee will be 7:00 p.m., November 18, 2019, in the Sarge Littlehale Community Room, 22 Orinda Way, Orinda, California. Prepared by: K. McCourt 9 DRAFT October 21, 2019  October 2019 Moving Violations CVC INFRACTION DESCRIPTION TICKETED WARNING LOCATION OF INFRACTION REGISTRATION 4000 (a)(1) Unregistered vehicle (I) 23 4159 Change of address 5200 No plates or one missing 6 Brookwood / Camino Pablo Moraga Way / Brookwood Moraga Way / Vashell IFO 73 Brookwood Rio Vista / Cresta Blanca 101 Orinda Way 5201 Improper plate mouting 5204 (a) Reg tabs on rear plates 44625 False Tabs DRIVERS LICENSE 12500(a) Unlicensed driver 12951(a) CDL not in possession 14601.1(a) Driving w/lic. Sus/revoked 2 Miner Rd / Bien Venida Camino Pablo / Miner Rd 14601.3(a) Habitual off 14603 Disobey restriction on DL 2159 Change of address SPECIAL ANTI‐THEFT LAWS 16028(a) No evidence of insurance 1 Camino Pablo / Miner Rd TRAFFIC SIGNS 21453(a) Red signal or arrow 2 Moraga Way / Brookwood Camino Pablo/ Manzanita  21461(a) Failure to obey sign or signal 4 Moraga Way / Ivy Dr (3) Santa Maria / Orinda Way TURNING, STOPPING, & TURN SIGNALS 21460 (a) Driving over double yellow line 2 Miner Rd / Bien Venida (2) 22100 (b) Improper left turn at intersection 22101(b) Markings or signs for turning 22102 U turn in business disctrict 22103 U turn in business disctrict 22106 Unsafe backing 22107 Turning W/O due caution or signal SPEED LAWS 22349 Max speed limit (65) 22350 Basic speed law 1 Camino Pablo / Monte Vista 23109(a) Speed contest SPECIAL STOPS REQUIRED 22450 Stop at stop sign 4 St Stephens / El Nido Ranch (3) Camino Sobrante / Orinda Way STOPPING, STANDING AND PARKING 22502(a) Parked wrong way 22507.8 Parking for disabled persons 1 67 Moraga Way 22514 Parking IFO fire hydrant 22515 Setting brakes  22526 Blocking an intersection PUBLIC OFFENSES Disobedience to person directing 21100.3 traffic 23123.5 Handheld device 1 Camino Pablo / Santa Maria 23124 Handheld device ‐ minor 23152(a) Misd drunk/drugs (M) 23152(b) Drunk/drugs +.08 (M) 23247 (a) Interlock Required 23700 Ignition locking device 25152 DUI PEDESTRIAN RIGHTS AND DUTIES 21950(a) Yield to a pedestrian 21209 Drive in bike lane DRIVING ON RIGHT SIDE 21651 (b) Driving over or across barrier 21658(a) Changing lanes without due caution EQUIPMENT OF VEHICLES 24002 Unsafe Vehicle 24252 A Inoperative brake light 24400 Headlamps ‐ Headlight out (l) 24400© Headlamps in the rain Low mean approaching oncoming 24409(a) car 24409 (b) Low beam following another vehicle 24600 Taillamps 24600(b) Taillamps; two required (l) 24601 License plate lamp 24603(b) Stoplamps; two required (l) 24609 (b) Failure to dim highbeams 22515 Parking brake 26101 Taped Tail Lights 52016 Cover over lic plate 26708 Tint Defective Windshield / Rear 26710 Window 27315 Mandatory safety belts 27400 Headset or earplugs in both ears (l) 27803(a) Motorcycle helmet OTHER 21804(a) Yield R/W Private Road or Alley 22454© Passing a school bus 21806 Failure to Yield to emergency vehicle 21755(a) Unsafe passing on right 21703 Follow too close 21800(a) Failure to yield 21800(d) Inoperable Signals 1 Camino Pablo / Santa Maria TOTAL 48 0 LAST MONTH 67 0  October 2019 Orinda Municipal Codes OMC INFRACTION DESCRIPTION TICKETED LOCATION OF INFRACTION 10.36.020 72 hr parking only 10.36.030 Car for sale/advertize 10.36.080 Vehicle outside marked space 10 Bryant / Moraga Way (6) Brookwood / Moraga Way 67 Moraga Way Brynat Way / EB 24 on ramp Bryant Way 10.36.100 Obstructing mailbox 10.40.040 Commercial loading zone 10.44.030 Failure to obey no parking 6 Bryant / Moraga Way (5) 101 Wilder Rd 10.44.050 Parking in pass pick up zone 10.44.050b Parking within crosswalk 1 Bryant Way / Moraga Way 10.44.050c Parking within red zone 2 Moraga Way / Bryant 73 Brookwood Rd 10.44.050e Obstucting public/private driveway 10.44.050f Parking on sidewalk 10.44.050g Vehicle obstructing traffic 10.44.050h Double parking 10.44.050i Parking within bus zone 10.44.060 Curb parking 10.44.070 Exceeding posted time limit 40 50 Moraga Way (3) 2 Theater Sq (4) 51 Moraga Way (2)  63 Moraga Way 22 Bryant Way (2) 96 Davis Rd 35 Moraga Way 72 Moraga Way (2) 46 Brookwood Rd 5 Moraga Way (3) 19 Moraga Way 77 Moraga Way (2) 67 Moraga Way 26 Orinda Way (9) Moraga Way / Theater Sq 81 Moraga Way 8 Southwood Ct 76 Davis Rs 78 Davis Rd 92 Davis Rd (2) 10.44.090 Failure to curb wheels on hill Oversize/commercial vehicle 10.52.030 prohibited TOTAL 59 LAST MONTH 35  # of # of # of Tickets Officer Tickets Tickets CVC OMC Parking Enforcement OMC Brooks Epstein 0 Brown 8 Perez 2 Chavez Petty 0 Hart Rubalcava 34 Hom 36 Hughes 4 Lusarta Mullins 2 O'Hara 3 Sandy Scanlan Walley 17 0 This does not account for multiple violations on the same ticket Some parking citations are recorded as CVC.  Annual Totals MONTH CVC OMC WARNINGS January 131 241 14 February 79 168 12 March 98 179 24 April 60 119 12 May 29 84 0 June 47 99 2 July 40 69 2 August 84 72 0 September 67 35 0 October 48 59 November December 683 1125 66 TOTAL TICKETS 1808