Planning Commission

MM\IUTE RECORD PAPILLION PLANNTNG COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 16,2022 The Papillion Planning Commission met in open session at the papillion City Hall Council chambers on wednesday, November 16,2022 al7:,oo pM. vice chair Fioward cjrson ca ed the meeting to order. Senior Planner Michelle Romeo called the roll. Planning Commission members present were Heather Bernady, Howard carson, Jim Hrabik, Ray Kellel Jr., John E. Robinson lll, Leanne sotak and Herb rhompson. wayne wilson, Judy Emiwiler and ierecca Hoch were absent- Planning Director Travis Gibbons, Deputy city Att6rney carla Heathershaw Risko and Public Works Director Mike Kleffner were also present. Vice Chair Carson led those present in the pledge of Allegiance. Notice .of the meeting was given in advance by publication in the sarpy county Guide on November 4, 2022. A copy of proof of publication is on file at the office of the city clerk. Vice chair carson announced that a copy of the open Meetings Act is posted in council Chambers. Approval of Aqenda Motion was made by Mr. Hrabik, seconded by Mr. Robinson lll, to approve the agenda as presented. Roll call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion canied. Approval of the Planninq Commission Minutes Motion was made by Mr. Hrabik, seconded by Mr. Robinson lll, to approve the september 2g, 2022 minutes. Roll call: seven yeas, no nays, two abstentions from Ms. Emswiler and' Mr. wlson. Motion carried. FINAL PLATS Final Plat - A request for a Final Plat for the property legally described as a tract of land being part of the NE zr of the sw %, part of the sE lq of the sE%, parl of the sw % ot the sE%, pari of the NW /q ol lhe sE%, Parl of the NE /t of the sw %, and part of the sE % of the sw %, all in section 28, T14N, Rl2E of the 6th p.M., sarpy county, NE, generally located on the sw corner of S 96th street and Lincoln Road. The applicant is Granite creek Development, LLC. (Granite Creek East) FP-22.0006 Vice Chair Carson called for the applicant. Patrick sullivan, 1246 Golden Gate Dr, stepped forward to represent the applicant. He summarized the Granite Creek East and Granite Creek West projects. Mr. Sullivan described the various types of housing that will be provided. An elementary school, public parks, and a small commercial area will also be provided in Granite Creek East- He noted that the developer is working with city staff on the city's acquisition on a proposed 18-acre park. Mr. sullivan highlighted the planned trail system including the improvements to the underpass beneath HWy  370. He provided an overview ofthe street connections to the existing street system. He noted that the developer is working with NDOT to relocate the S 102nd Street entrance being moved 200' to the west. Mr. Sullivan described the debt ratio for the Granite Creek East project. He noted that an apartment lot for two-story buildings is included. Vice Chair Carson called for discussion amongst the Commission. Vice Chair Carson questioned whether there was an agreement with school district, and which phase the apartmenl complex will be built. Mr. Sullivan confirmed there is an agreement with the school that will be built concurrently with the development, and that the entire project is being built as one phase. with no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Keller, seconded by Mr. Robinson lll, to recommend approval of the Granite Creek East Final Plat (FP-22-OOO6) because it is generally consistent with the comprehensive plan, compatible with adjacent uses, and compliant with Zoning and Subdivision Regulatlons, contingent upon the resolution of staff comments. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion carried Final PIat - A request for a Final Plat for the property legally described as a platting of Tax Lot lBandraxLotlAlcinthesE/+of thesw%of section 22,T14N,R12Eof the6thp.M.,sarpy county, generally located at 910 w 6th street. The applicant is Easy Living communities. (Farmstead Acres) - FP-22-0006 Vice Chair Carson called for the applicant for additional input. Seeing no further input, Vice Chair Carson called for Commission Discussion Mr. Hrabik suggested that the new property owner had time to fix the maintenance issues at the mobile home park prior to City Council. He recommended that the residents go to the City Council Meeting if the mobile home park is not being maintained. with no further discussion, Motion was made by.Mr. Keller, seconded by Mr. Hrabik, to recommend approval of the Farmstead Acres Final plat (Fp-22-000g). Roll call: Six yeas, one nay. Motion passes. PUBLIC HEARINGS Special Use Permit - A request for a Special Use Permit to allow Auto Services as a permitted use for the property legally described as Lot 2, Monarch place Replat one, generally located at 1419 Papillion Drive. The applicant is vantEdge Auto T5 Real Estate LLC. (Take 5 oil change at Monarch Place) - SUP-22.0002 Vice Chair Carson opened the public hearing. Douglas Dreessen, 10836 old Mill Rd (omaha), stepped forward to represent the applicant. He described the proposed use which consists of a three-stall quick oil change facility. He noted that the applicant will work with staff to address the comments in the planning Commission Staff Report. 2 Planning Commission November 16, 2022 Vice Chair Carson called for proponents and opponents. Mr. Minh Phan, 1449 Papillion Drive, stepped forward as a business owner at Monarch place. He expressed concern that a large building on small lot will block view of smaller existing businesses. He noted concern about the increase with traffic since the use will be located next to a busy Starbucks. He also expressed concern for the environment as to where the oil would be disposed. Mr. Brian Boganowski, 10820 s 204h Ave circle (Gretna), stepped foruvard as a business owner at Monarch Place. He expressed concern about increased traffic at an already busy area due lo starbucks location next door and suggested a traffic study be performed. He suggested this location should become an overflow parking lot for Starbucks or be a drivethrough ATM. Seeing no further input, Vice Chair Carson closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. Mr. Robinson lllasked for information on traffic and runoff. Mr. Robinson also confirmed how busy Starbucks can get on weekends. Mr. Dreessen stated no traffic study has been done but Mr. Boganowski's concerns are understandable based on his experience at Starbucks in Omaha. He indicated a willingness to confirm that the Take s oil change will have adequate parking. Mr. Dreessen asserted that is not valid to deny Take 5 oil change a special use permit due to Starbucks using that lot as parking. He also mentioned thal traffic issues are not uncommon at businesses like Costco and Starbucks. Mr. Hrabik asked if there is a site plan with more detail. Mr. Dreessen stated the drawing included in the packet is the only one there is. Mr. Hrabik asked if rake 5's parking will be on the west side with adequate parking. Mr. Dreessen answered that he believes so but will need to check on Starbucks' lease. Mr. Hrabik stated he would like to see more dimensional drawings when project being presented at meeting. He noted concern that there currenfly being too many unanswered questions. Mr. Dreessen provided dimensions for parking and drives with the building being 1,300 sF total. He stated dimensions will be added going fonvard. Vice Chair Carson stated af the client is aware of existing businesses such as Starbucks, FedEx, and the BBQ place. He noted that it is difficult to get to when travelling south on S 72"d Street and customers will need to drive through the existing parking lot in order to get to Take 5 oil Change. Mr. Dreessen believes the client is aware. Vice Chair Carson questioned the parking for potential client. Mr. Dreessen stated it's a quick oil change business so parking would not be an issue. Ms' Sotak stated she is not able to make a good decision based on the incomplete submittal and would need more detail. She stated she will not be able to vote until more details have been provided including a traffic study. J Planning Commission Novembell6, 2022 Vice Chair Carson asked Commission for their input on their preference for voting on the request or a layover. Mr. Hrabik suggest that the Commission vote on the request. Vice Chair Carson stated the applicant can table it and carry over to a future meeting. Mr. Keller advocated for the Commission to vote on the request. With no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Robinson lll, seconded by Ms. Bernady, to recommend approval of the Take 5 Oil Change (SUP-22-0007) because it is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, compatible with adjacent uses, and compliant with Zoning Regulations, contingent upon the resolution of staff comments. Roll Call: Three yeas, Four nays by Ms. Bernady, Mr. Hrabik, Ms. Sotak, and Mr. Thompson. Motion failed. Chanqe of Zone - A request for a Change of Zone from MU Mixed Use to CC Community Commercial for the property legally described as Lot 5, Generations, generally located on the NW corner of S 120th Street and HWY 370. The applicant is BHI Properties, lnc. (Generations - Lot 5) Cz-22-0006 Vice Chair Carson opened the public hearing. Randy Kuszak, 14710 W Dodge Road, Suite 100 (Omaha), stepped forward to represent the applicant. Mr. Kuszak provided an overview ofthe requested rezoning for Lot 5. He noted that Lot 5 is part of a future phase of the Generations Mixed Use District. He explained that the mixed use development agreement for Phase 1 is still being finalized; however, the developer has interest in developing Lot 5. Mr. Kuszak indicated that the proposed rezoning to CC Community Commercial is consistent with the proposed base zoning district for the Generations Mixed Use District. He noted that the uses would be similar to the Generations Mixed Use District; however, Lot 5 would not be subject to the same regulations. He identified Better Homes and Gardens as a potential buyer. Mr. Kuszak reviewed the proposed administrative replat. He noted that conceptual elevations were provided for Better Homes and Gardens. Mr. Kuszak explained that the other buildings are conceptual and will be developed in accordance with the CC Community Commercial regulations. Vice Chair Carson called for proponents. Jessica Thomas, 10250 Regency Cir # 300 (Omaha), stepped foruard representing the buyer of a portion of Lot 5. She expressed support for the request and offered to answer any questions. Vice Chair Carson called for opponents. Seeing no further input, Vlce Chair Carson closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. Vice Chair Carson asked where the Better Homes and Gardens building would be located. Mr. Kuszak showed that it would be located on Lot 1, Generations Replat 1 when such replat is approved. Two other users are anticipated in addition to Better Homes and Gardens. 4 Planning Commission November 16, 2022 With no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Hrabik, seconded by Mr. Thompson, to recommend approval of the Generations - Lot 5 Change of Zone (CC-22-0006) because it is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, compatible with adjacent uses, and compliant with the Zoning Regulations. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion canied. Preliminarv Plat - A request for a Preliminary Plat for the property legally described as a tract of land located in the SE lq of the SW % of Section 36, T14N, Rl2E of the 6th p.M., Sarpy County, generally located NW of 66th street and schram Road. The applicant is Spruce capital Group, LLC. (Tighe Farm) PP-22-0003 Vice Chair Carson opened the public hearing. Larry Jobeun, 11440 w center Rd (omaha), stepped forward to represent the applicant. Mr. Jobeun noted that his presentation would address both the Preliminary Plat and Change of Zone requests. He noted the location of project and advised that 66th Street does not currently exist at this location but is a part of this project and will connect with HWY 370. He stated there are four lots with Lots '1, 2, and 4 for residential uses and zoned as R-4 and Lot 3 is for commercial use and zoned CC Community Commercial. He explained the proposed subdivision is 39.9 acres with a '100' easement for OPPD that goes diagonal through the entire lot. Mr. Jobeun advised the proposal offers a mix of cottages, direct access units and townhomes, which is consistent with the Future Land Use map. He stated that all the streets internally will be private streets; however, Towne Center Parkway will be a public street. He explained that Schram Road will be extended to 66th Street which will be extended to HWY 370 and signal modifications will be needed on the south side of H\IVY 370. Mr. Jobeun stated the apartments will not be the standard three-story buildings, but instead they will be two story buildings. He stated it is unique plan for the city. Mr. Jobeun asserted that the development will be nicely done as he showed examples of buildings for this project. Vice Chair Carson called for proponents and opponents. Eric and Joni Parks, 11515 s 72nd street, stepped fonrvard as residents direc y to the west. Mr. Parks expressed concem that Towne Center Parkway will run through their home and outbuilding. He noted that their home is not an old farmstead, instead they have recently remodeled it and have no plans to sell. Mr. Parks also expressed concern about the development process due to the fact there is a current development just to their south that is creating lots of dirt and garbage. He asserted that the high density of project will result in a significant increase of traffic. Marty Giff wilh Giff Property se rvices, 2211 Thurston cir (Bellevue), stepped fonrard as Eric and Joni Parks representative. Mr. Giff stated the City Ordinance considers 12+ units per acre as high density, and this has 17 units per acre which he believes is extreme. Mr. Giff states that the plan looks great on a flat piece of paper, but with the elevation changes on property will make the extension of Towne Center Parkway very difficult. He also stated that the Parks needed to redo their driveway due to the elevation changes. Mr. Giff also stated that the proposed buffer is 15 20' and he sees no reason for that to be granted. He expressed concern that the proposed - apartment building will be 50'high and the tenants will be able to took down on to the parks, property. 5 Planning Commission November 16, 2022 Mr. Terry Tighe, 14102 S 108th Sheet (Springfield) noted that he owns the property directly to the east. He questioned why this project is recommended for approval when others with similar proposed ideas were denied. He stated there are some fragile wetlands on that property that needed to be considered. He also stated that S 66th Street will run right through his property, and he will lose part of it. Mr. Marvin Leaders, 1390'1 Schram Road (Omaha) questioned whether the right-of-way for S 66th Street will be required from his property to the east and how his property would be impacted. Seeing no further input, Vice Chair Carson closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. Mr. Hrabik expressed his concerns with high density residential projects being approved in the past with very little access and egress. Ms. Sotak concurred that the high density residential use is a valid concern. She addressed past projects that had been approved with not enough parking. She suggested that the number of the units be reduced and that more parking be added. Vice Chair Carson asked for Mr. Jobeun to answer the questions regarding right-of-way and the financing. Mr. Jobeun stated the righlof-way will be required with this development from the adjacent properties. He noted that future developments will pay toward the cost per standard practice. He stated that the signal modifications at S 66th Street and HWY 370 will be made. He advocated that the proposed development complies with the City's future land map use and is not out of the ordinary. He suggested that the public road improvements would not be financially feasible without the high density residential development. Mr. Jobeun stated that High Density Residential projects are necessary in order for Papillion to have different housing opportunities. He also stated that Towne Center Parkway will not go through the Parks' residence unless they decide to have that land developed. Mr. Hrabik asked if there will be an exit lane off HWY 370 when headed eastbound. Mr. Jobeun stated that there will be a dedicated right turn lane. He noted that Schram Road, Towne Center Parkway and 66th Street will all be designed to carry a lot of traffic. Conventional residential projects differ from commercial and retail projects since they do not have the high traffic times in the A.M. and P.M. Vice Chair Carson asked about the alignment of a future Towne Center Parkway extension. Mr. Jobeun reiterated that Towne Center Parkway will not be constructed if the Parks' never move. He also stated that this is a challenging site due to the 100'easement for OPPD, and with the grade changes and the sanitary sewer outfall needs to be installed. He stated that the high density residential project can fiscally support these high cost improvements. Vice Chair Carson stated that the contingency list is long and asked Mr. Jobeun if his client accepts the contingencies. Mr. Jobeun stated that they were happy to see that list of contingencies was not long. He noted that his client will work with staff. 6 Planning Commission November 16, 2022 Ms. Bernady asked the properties are going to be rental or owned. Mr. Jobeun stated that they will all be owned by the developer and leased to the tenants. Mr. Hrabik asserted that he is seeing more high density residential projects than new single family home projects. He expressed concern that there will be too many apartment buildings. Vice Chair Carson agreed with Mr. Hrabik concerns. He noted that staff has assured that there are not too many yet, but stated he is seeing a lot of apartments around town. He asked staff why Towne Center Parkway was not drawn to go south ofthe Parks' residence. Mr. Gibbons explained the City's policy for arterial road spacing requirements. He noted that S 66th Street is an arterial, so the location of rowne center Parkway needs to comply with the spacing requirements for a full access turn movement. He acknowledged that Towne Center Parkway will not go through the Parks' property until it is redeveloped. He noted that west access will be provided via Schram Road. Mr. Gibbons noted that the alignment of rowne center parkway through the parks' property could be adjusted should that property ever be redeveloped. He clarified thatthe Future Land Use map was developed through a public process that included charettes and reviewed by Planning commission before being approved by city council. He reviewed how the density patterns were established during that process. Mr. Gibbons identified the future land use for the proposed project as high density residential and commercial use. He noted that the future land use was determined based on the supporting street network of Schram Road (a collector) and S 66th Street (an arterial) that connect to a state highway. He explained why high density residential uses are placed along arterial streets and why density drops moving away from the arterial system. He noted that high density residential uses are to exceed a density of 12 units per acre. He also noted that 17 units per acre for the proposed development is consistent with high density residential and lower than typical 20 units per acre for existing development in papillion. Mr. Hrabik asked why the buffer with the Parks'property was reduced by soo/o. Mr. Gibbons explained how landscape buffer requirements are determined. He noted that the future land use designation for the Parks' property is high density residential and commercial. He indicated that a landscape buffer would not be required should the property be redeveloped in the future. He explained how staff made a recommendation balanced the current use (and the distance between the buildings) with the future land use. Mr. Keller expressed his concern with the dirt and garbage that comes along with the project and how that is being handled. Mr. Kleffner stated there are weekly inspections and if there are any complaints they will go out and investigate. He also stated that this summer was unusually dry which make the construction site dustier, but they will typically contact the developer and ask them to water more. Mr. Keller asked if the resident would call the City if it gets too dusty and if the development would pay for the cleanup. Mr. Kleffner stated that the resident can call the City if the dust gets out of hand, and he would speak with the project's engineer about increasing the watering of site. lf they were repetitive that would then become a civil matter. 7 Planning Commission November 16,2022  with no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Robinson lll, seconded by Ms. Bernady, to recommend approval of the Tighe Farm preliminary plat (pp-22-0003). Roll call: Six yeas, one nay by Mr. Hrabik. Motion passes. chanoe of Zone - A request for a change of Zone from AG Agricultural to cc community commercial and R-4/PUD-2 Multiple-Family Residential with a specific planned unit Development Overlay for the property legally described as a tract of land located in the SE % of the SW % of section 36, T14N, R12E of the 6th p.M., Sarpy county, generally located NW of 66th street and schram Road. The applicant is Spruce capital Group, LLC. (Tighe Farm) cZ- - 22-0007 Vice Chair Carson opened the public hearing. Larry Jobeun, 11440 w center Rd (omaha), stepped forward to represent the applicant. He noted no further comment. Vice Chair Carson called for proponents and opponents. Seeing no further input, Vice Chair Carson closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. with no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Robinson lll, seconded by Mr. Keller, to recommend approval of the Tighe Farm preliminary plat (cz-22-ooo7)_ Roll call: six yeas, one nay by Mr. Hrabik. Motion passes. Preliminarv Plat - A request for a Preliminary Plat for the property legally described as a platting of rax Lot 1B and rax Lot 1A1c in the sE %ol the sw % of section 22,T14N, R12E of the 6th P.M., sarpy county, generally located at 910 w 6th street. The applicant is Easy Living Communities. (Farmstead Acres) - PP-22-OOO4 Vice Chair Carson opened the public hearing. scott Braun, 1500'1 Mormon St (Bennington) stepped fonvard representing the developer. Mr. Braun stated there would be additional lots for mobile homes, a permanent storm shelter along with public facilities such as a park. He noted that the property will be rezoned to MH Mobile Home Residential to be compliant with the current codes and there is a cunent lot to the north that will remain Limited lndustrial. He also stated there will be as a second access point from N Frontier Drive- Vice chair carson stated that an e-mail is included in everyone,s packet from Ms. cheryl Krupski. Vice Chair Carson called for proponents. Brent Beller, 11440w center Road (omaha) stepped forward as the representing attorney for the applicant stating he will be available for any questions. Vice Chair Carson called for opponents. 8 Planning Commission November 16, 2022 Cheryl Krupski, 632 Bailey Circle (Papillion) stated that she had sent an e-mait regarding this project as her house backs up to most northern lot. Ms. Krupski expressed concerns with many trailers in a small space, and that the mobile home park is not being well maintained. She noted that she has called and was informed the tenants were asked to maintain their mobile home. Ms. Krupski explained that one neighbor is elderly and disabled and is unable to maintain her mobile home. She asserted that the neighborhood she lives in has covenants which are to be followed. She stated the previous owner of the park would maintain it, but the new owner is not maintaining the mobile home park. She asserted there has been vandalism and nothing is being done about it. She questioned if the project would have more green space and if the trailers would be uniform and moved further apart as it is currenfly a fire hazard. Tom Krupski, 632 Bailey cir (Papillion) concured with Mrs. Krupski. He stated he was close friends with the previous owner and helped by maintaining the area by his fence; however, this is not the case anymore. He asserted that he hears gunshots and fireworks from the mobile home park on a regular basis. He stated that these issues made them feel the need to put a lock on their fence and add a notice stating they have dogs. He understands we need affordable housing but questioned whether this is the correct direction. Patty Longcrier, 631 Bailey Cir (Papillion) stated she has put a lot of work into her house, including a retaining wall. she asserted that several times there have been people in her backyard, and she has also heard gunshots and fireworks from the mobile home park. She stated the previous owner maintained the mobile home park, and the trailer right behind her house is abandoned and nobody is taking care of either. She expressed concern about the number of trailers will be put added because it will mean more people hanging out in her backyard. She explained she had a "No Trespassing" sign on her gate to no avail. She also asserted that her gate has been broken that she now must repair it. Seeing no further input, Vice Chair Carson closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. Mr. Hrabik stated that he has a recreational vehicle, and his neighborhood has strict covenants as to where it can be parked. He asserted that the mobile home park's rules and regulations is not up to par, and he expressed concern about the mobire home park's maintenance. Vice Chair Carson asked the question as to who owns the trailers. Mr. Beller stated that the new owner will clean up the park, and that there are several improvements going to be made, but it takes a long time to get the plans prepared for approval. He explained the current park was grandfathered and had no standards. Mr. Beller stated that once the approval has been completed, the project will be complete within one to two years. He stated the zoning will be rezoned to MH Mobile Home Residential instead of the current Ll Limited lndustrial which will allow for the development to proceed as they intend. Vice chair carson asked if the tenant owns the mobile home, but the landowner owns the land. Mr. Beller stated that is correct. I Planning Commission November 16, 2022 vice chair carson asked who's responsible for mowing the yard. Mr. Beller stated that the property owner will be doing all the landscaping and yardwork. Ms. Sotak asked when the new owner took ownership. Mr. Beller stated that was about 18 months ago. Ms. sotak asked who has been responsible for the maintenance during that time. Ms. sotak expressed concern about the fact that no maintenance has been done. Mr. Beller explained that he would need to consult his client about maintenance practices. He indicated that he would make his client aware of the maintenance concerns. Ms. Sotak stated that the new owner should be responsible for maintaining the mobile home park and that rules and regulations should be in place. Mr. Beller stated he will speak with the owner. Mr. Hrabik asked if there will be regulations about deteriorating mobile homes. Mr. Beller stated that regulations will be more stringent with the new leases. Ms. Carla Heathershaw Risko stated that the mobile home park document in the packet is a state statute. Don white, 910 w 6th st (Papillion), stepped forward as the mobile home park's property manager. Mr. white stated that each resident mows their own yard, and if they are not complying a notice will be left. He agreed with the residents about the weeds on the north end and stated a tree companywas renting an outbuilding butwas asked to leave due to too much debris. He explained that he will clean this all up and be more proactive going fonrvard. Mr. White asserted that the gunshots and fireworks are not coming from the mobile home park, instead they are coming from the industrial park to the east. He advised that the new lease is 13 pages long because the new owner is committed to make the mobile home park pleasant. Vice Chair Carson asked if all the outbuildings will be removed. Mr. Braun stated that they will and along with that they will extend the fire infrastructure. Vice Chair Carson asked if the current drive into the park will stay the same. Mr. Braun stated that yes it will, along with the additional entry from N Frontier Drive. Mr. Keller stated that he understands the frustration of the neighboring residents. He also asked what the residents can legally do if the mobile home park is not properly maintained. Ms. carla Heathershaw Risko stated she is not familiar with the state statute provided by Mrs. Krupski and that she would need to review it to properly advise the Commission. She suggested that failing to maintain the mobile home park is most likely a civil claim and that the tenant would contact the Iandlord. she noted that the city has ordinances for nuisances, trash, weeds, automobiles which could be violations. She also stated the Police should be contacted if there are gunshots or flreworks. Mr. Thompson expressed hope that the new owner will act now, and that it will not take another 12 - 18 months. 10 Planning Commission November 16, 2022 Mr. Hrabik concurred with Mr. Thompson. With no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Hrabik, seconded by Mr. Thompson, to recommend approval of the Farmstead Acres Preliminary Plat (PP-22-0004). Roll call: Six yeas, One nay by Ms. Sotak. Motion passes. Chanqe of Zone - A request for a Change of Zone from Ll Limited lndustrial to MH Mobile Home (Lot 1 only) for the property legally described as a platting of Tax Lot 1B and Tax Lot lAl C in the SE % of the SW % of Section 22, T14N, R12E of the 6th P.M., Sarpy County, generally located at 910 W 6th Street. The applicant is Easy Living Communities. (Farmstead Acres) - CZ-22- 0005 Vice Chair Carson opened the public hearing. Vice Chair Carson called for proponents and opponents. Seeing no further input, Vice Chair Carson closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. Mr. Keller commented about the neighbors' positive support for the mobile home park so long as it is being maintained. With no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Hrabik, seconded by Ms. Bernady, to recommend approval of the Farmstead Preliminary Plat (cz-22-o005). Roll call: six yeas, one nay by Ms. Sotak. Motion passes. Six Year Road Plan - A request to approve the Six Year Road Plan for the City of Papillion. The applicant is the City of Papillion. M|SC.22-0019 Vice Chair Carson called for the applicant. Mr. Kleffner presented the Six Year Road Plan for the public to hear keeping with the state statute. Vice Chair Carson opened the public hearing. steve Engberg, 804 smith circle stepped forward as the city council Member for that ward. He expressed support for the Public Works Department but noted concern about one project in the six Year Road Plan. He recommended the removal of the project in 202412025 to extend N Beadle Street, N osage street, and E 3d street. Mr. Engberg provided an overview of the history of the proposal to extend N Beadle Street, N osage street, and E 3d street. He asserted that these dead-end streets were not originally planned to be extended. Mr. Engberg noted his concerns about the impact of the street extensions to the residents in the area. He expressed support for the residents' petition objecting to the street extensions. He explained that a traffic study and input from the Fire and Police Departments showed the extensions would provide minimal beneflt and would not substantially improve the Fire and police response time. He suggested the cost of this improvement would be better spent on other priorities such as updating City Park. He also noted, in reference to the previous agenda item, that City Council is working on a property maintenance code. 't1 Planning Commission November 16,2022 Vice Chair Carson called for proponents and opponents. William Smith, 121 N Beadle St (Papillion) stated that the extension of Beadte St wi1 have a negative impact at his residence and the extension will have a minimal advantage. He also stated that he has the same concerns as Mr. Engberg. Paula Adams, 121 N Beadle St (Papillion) expressed gratitude that the Commission is taking the time to listen to residents' concerns. she stated that she has the same concerns as Mr. smith. Michael riedeman, 101 Summerset Dr (papillion) stated that he will not be impacted by the proposed street extensions; however, he wants them removed because street projects should be beneficial and fiscally responsible. He asserted the traffic study did not support the road extension, which makes the project fiscally irresponsible. Loreen Reynante, 1108 Parc Dr (Papillion) noted that this is not her neighborhood, but it is her ward' She stated that she is against the road extension and wants the City to preserve its charm and not anger its residents. she suggested that the money should be saved since the project provides no benefit. Seeing no further input, Vice Chair Carson closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. Mr. Keller recommended removal of the road extension stating that it needs to be decided by Council. Mr. Hrabik asked if N Grandview Avenue goes through the care facility to E 1st Street. Mr. Engberg stated that it does not. Mr. Kleffner stated that there is an unpaved portion that connects to the care facilities private driveway so there is not a public street connection. Vice Chair Carson expressed support for other priorities such as improving W 6h Streeuportal Road because it is dangerous and needs guardrails. He also recommended prioritizing projects at s 150b Street and HWY 370 and s 132nd street and HWy 370. Mr. Kleffner stated that M4g3- 169 is for cornhusker Road/s 6th steevPortal Road from s 72nd street to 1Ogh street. He noted that the project design is scheduledfor FY 2022 - 2023 with the expectation of phasing the project to complete segments every two to lhree years. He stated that the project includes federal funds so funding availability will impact the schedule. Vice chair carson questioned why guardrails could not be added now. He also queslioned whether S 6th Street would be closed during the reconstruction. Mr. Kleffner stated that the environment study is being completed and will dictate the closure, but he believes that 6u Street could be closed for six months. Vice Chair Carson noted that the street extensions would be beneficial for the traffic to be routed during that period. Mr. Kleffner stated that he'll be available after the meeting for questions related to Vice Chair Carson,s concerns. Vice Chair Carson asserted that the yellow blinking lights throughout the City are poorly designed and turning becomes impossible during traffic peak hours. He recommended that be addressed. '12 Planning Commission November '16, 2022 Mr. Thompson asked if the Commission could recommend how to allocate the money. Ms. Romeo reminded the Commission of their role as a recommending body. Mr. Robinson lll asked Mr. Kleffnerwhat his thoughts are on these street extensions. Mr. Kleffner stated that the traffic study did not identify a significant benefit. He also stated that the Fire and Police Departments did a response time study and that did not result in any significant benefits. Mr. Hrabik asserted that the money for this project could be spent on a better project. With no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Keller seconded by Mr. Hrabik, to recommend approval of the Six Year Road Plan (MISC-22-0019) contingent upon the elimination of Projects M483-228,252, and 226. Roll call: Six yeas, One nay by Mr. Thompson. Motion passes. OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Gibbons announced that rarja Koistila is the new Planning & Legal clerk. With no further business to come before the Commission, Motion was made by Vice Chair Carson, seconded by Mr. Hrabik, to adjourn. Roll call: Seven yeas, No nays. Motion passes. The meeting adjourned by unanimous consent at 9:39 P.M. C]TY OF PAPILLION Howard Carson, Vice Chair 13 Planning Commission November 16,2022