Planning Commission

MINUTE RECORD PAPILLION PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIT.IG JUNE 26, 2024 The Papillion Planning Commission met in open session at the papillion City Hall Council chambers on wednesday, June 26, 2024 al 7:oo pM. chairwoman iebecca Hoch caled the meeting to order. Planning & Le^gal Clerk Tarja Koistila called the roll. plan;ing aommission members present were Howard. carson, Michier Erdman, Raymond Keller Jr., ftryn" wir"on, Craig Mielke and Chris Tointon. Leanne Sotak and Herb Thompson were absent. Senior planner Michelle Romeo, Planner I Kevin pflager, Assistant city Attorney carla Heathershaw Risko, and Deputy City Engineer Derek Goff were also present. Chairwoman Hoch led those present in the pledge of Allegiance. the meeting was given in advance by pubrication in the sarpy county Times I:ti::-ol 12, 2024. copies of proof pubrication on June of are on fir'e at the office of the ciiy cierr. chairwoman Hoch announced that a copy of the open Meetings Act is posted in councir Chambers. ADproval of Agenda Motion was made by Mr. Kefler,seconded by Mr. carson, to approve the agenda as presenied. Roll call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion carried. Motion was made by Mr. Tointon, seconded by Mr. Erdman, to approve the May 29,2024 minutes. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS Golleqe - Preliminary Plat - A request for a preliminary plat and Change of Zone from R-4 Multiple-Family Residential to cc community commercial for the property tegally described as Part of rax Lot F, Tax Lot c, and part of rax Lot H of section 36, rtiru, nt tr ot the 6th P.M., Sarpy County, NE., generally located SE corner of HWy 50 and HWy 370. Chairuoman Hoch opened the public hearing and called for the applicant. The applicant indicated that that they do not wish to be heard. Mr. Brian Emerich,2129 s 39th st, omaha NE stepped forward to represent the client. Mr. Emerich stated that he will answer any questions. Chainivoman Hoch called for proponents and opponents. Seeing no public input, Chairwoman Hoch closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. 1 Planning Commission June 26, 2024  bring. He Mr. Erdman stated that he is concerned about the traffic this development might as it appears wondered if the approach on to Gold coast Rd from Highway 50 will be extended to be too short. Mr. Emerich responded that yes, that will be extended' 144th street onto Gold coast Mr. Erdman also questioned the residential traffic coming down from that residents will Rd. He stated that he noticed there will be a roundabout, but he's concerned limited in terms of weight' take this route as a shortcut. He also wondered how the traffic will be that is able to size, and class. Mr. Emerich stated that it will be a typical residential classification putting in 25 mph signs which handle the medium to large size trucks. He stated that they are as well' should stop through traffic, and if warranted, speed bumps can be added located in that area Mr' Mr. Erdman asked if this will in any way obstruct the omaha cemetery gain access shared at that location' Emerich stated that they have been in discussion with them to and a possible land swap at a later date' Mr.Erdmanaskedaboutthebusinessmixtheyarelookingforinthisarea-Mr.DanWorrell, they do not currently have Director of campus Planning, stepped up and stated that at this time any commercial Partners. Highway 370. Ms Romeo Mr. Mielke expressed concern about the parking lots fronting against She also mentioned that there stated that parking lots would be allowed to be along Highway 370. Mr. Mielke also asked about is nothing in the iighway Overlay District that would prevent that. Mr. Emerich explained that the heavily wooded area along the Highway if that is to be removed. themajorityofthetrees"'"*itninthewateMaysetback,anditwouldrequirepermitstohave removed' them removed. She added that there are currently no plans to have them the south side of Highway Mr. Tointon asked if there is a culvert for the wetlands that run along 37o.Mr-EmerichStatedthatwhenthepublicimprovementsbegin,theywillneedtodigintothe intricacies of that crossing. wthnofurtherdiscussion,MotionwasmadebyMr.Carson'secondedbyMr'Tointon'to recommend approval the Metropolitan community college Preliminary Plat (PP-24-0003) and future use contingent on the because it is generally consistent with the comprehensive Plan applicant addiessing staff comments prior to city council. Roll call: seven yeas, no nays. Motion passed. of Zone from R-4 Metro Gommunitv Colleoe - Ghanoe of Zone - A request for a Change ili-un-,pr"+",.,ryn".ioentialto-cccommunitycommercialfortheeI9q:ly.99:lly,q::.:,,::d.?' part of Tax Lot F, Tax Lot G, and part of Tax Lot H of section 36, T14N, R"l1E ofthe 6th P M, HWY 370' Sarpy County, NE., generally located SE corner of HWY 50 and Chairwoman Hoch opened the public hearing and called for the applicant' The applicant indicated that that they do not wish to be heard' Chairwoman Hoch called for proponents and opponents' 2 Planning Commission June 26, 2024  Seeing no public input, Chairwoman Hoch closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. Mr. carson asked if this is approved at tonight's meeting, would the new zoning allow for big warehouses to be built in that area. Mr. Emerich stated that the new zoning will not allow for that. Mr. Carson also asked if there will be any student housing to which Mr. Worrell stated they do not currently have any plans for that. He added that for some of their programs they will utilize University of Nebraska Omaha's campus. with no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Keller, seconded by Mr. wilson, to recommend approval the Metropolitan community college change ol zone (cz-24-ooo4) because it is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, compatible with adjacent uses, compliant with Zoning and Subdivision Regulations. Roll call: seven yeas, no nays. Motion passed. Papillion Municipal code entitled "Adoption of Standards", to adopt the 2o2i Nationai Luctricat 9g!: tryeCl and Chapter 92-15(l) to adopt amendments to the 2023 trtationat Etectricat code (NEC). MtSC-24-0008 Chairwoman Hoch opened the public hearing and called for the applicant. Mr. Brad Sojka Director of Building & Fire Safety, 122 E Third St Papillion, stated that the state adopted the 2023 Electrical code, and the city must adopt the same code as required by the State Electrical Board. Chairwoman Hoch called for proponents and opponents. Seeing no public input, Chairwoman Hoch closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. Mr. Carson advocated for adjusting the electrical license requirements for HVAC, fire alarm, low voltage, and similar equipment installalions. He requested that his concern be addressed to the State. Mr. Sojka stated that his concern had been discussed internally. wth no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Keller, seconded by Mr. wilson, to recommend approval the 2023 NEC Adoption (Mlsc-24-0oog) because the proposed ordinance will bring municipal code into compliance with code standard set by the State of Nebraska and provide consistency with surrounding jurisdictions. Roll call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion passed. Special User Permit Update - A request to update the current Large Project Special Use permit Ordinance. chainrvoman Hoch asked the applicant, the city of papillion, to speak. Ms. Romeo stated that the first part of the update would be eliminating the large project special use permit for any nonresidential uses in our nonresidential zoning districts. The second part of the update would require all industrial development to comply with our industrial design guidelines. She stated that we currently only limit where we do industrial design guidelines, and it would be similar to how we ., Planning Commission June 26,2024  jurisdiction. Ms Romeo handle our commercial design guidelines which apply throughout our permit amendment procedure stated that the last piece of the update will formalize our special use to a special that we currently have. lt would formally create a process to make a minor amendment and then it use permit, which would be something that would be reviewed and approved by staff it is very similar to would also create a major amendment to a special use permit. she added that planned unit how we handle amendments to our mixed'use agreements, and then also our development agreements. empty she will Ms. Hoch stated that this is a public hearing, however due to the chambers being close the public hearing and open it up for commission discussion' Ms. Romeo Mr. Keller asked what the difference is between a maior versus minor amendment. the applicant wanted explained that an example of a minor amendment would be if the type of tree example would be if to use is not available and they need to change that. A major amendment originally had their hours they wanted to change the specific operating hours. For example, if they that would be as Monday through Friday and wanted to change that to a 2417 operuling shift, considered a major amendment. issued will be affected Mr. Keller also questioned if the special use permits that have already been permits will be able by this change. Ms. Romeo explained that all the current active special use to amend per the said changes. considered, if this Mr. Mielke asked about the projects that are undeMay and currently being she can only recall change will but any undue burden for the applicants. Ms. Romeo stated that longer need to apply for one application that would be affected by this change, and they would no a large project special use permit. Mr- Mielke also asked if they would still have to go through the yes, they would be minoi major amendment process with staff, to which Ms. Romeo stated that able to use the amendment procedure that we are asking for approval' Mr. \Mlson wondered how we will delineate between the minor and major special use permit. Ms. kind of what our Romeo stated that in the amendment language that we have, we have set parameters for major amendments would be. Their major amendment would be something that changes in the is a substantial change in the nature or the operating characteristic. Substantial more with a site plan, like increasing the density of the development, so that would often be per acre, and residential project. Another example, if we approved a density that was 20 units density to be 30 they came Lacr ano they said we want to add three buildings and they want the in their uniis per acre. Ms. Romeo also stated that anything that is a substantial change Mr. Wilson added architectural or site design features would be considered a major amendment. how much to push that he was thinking of the applicant's viewpoint and if they could determine than the the line versus having it come back through this process which assumably takes longer process would take longer than staff process. Ms. Romeo stated that that the formal amendment a staff review process simply because it is going to be putting the public hearing requirements in in special and they would have specific meeting dates that they would need to achieve. changes your building use permits are things that often are going to come up when you actually have that usually there design and you're starting to go through that building permit process she added good is a lot of collaboration that is happening with applicants by that point, and with that 4 Planning Commission June 26,2024 reworking relationship that we do have with the people that are in our community, they kind of know what to expect. ELECTIONS -chqiroerson - Motion was made by Mr. Mielke, seconded by Mr. Tointon, to open nominations for Chairperson. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion passed. Nominations: Rebecca Hoch Motion was made by Mr. Keller, seconded by Mr. Carson, to close nominations for Chairperson. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion passed. Ms. Koistila announced that Rebecca Hoch received the majority vote_ Motion was made by Mr. Keller, seconded by Mr. Carson, to approve the election of Rebecca Hoch as Chairperson. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion passed. Vice Chairperson - Motion was made by Mr. Keller, seconded by Mr. Carson, to open nominations for Vice Chairperson. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion passed. Nominations: Raymond Keller Motion was made by Mr. Tointon, seconded by Mr. Erdman, to close nominations for Vice Chairperson. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion passed. Ms. Koistila announced that Raymond Keller received the majority vote. Motion was made by Mr. Mielke, seconded by Mr. \Mlson, to approve the election of Howard Carson as Vice Chairperson. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion passed. OTHER BUSINESS With no further business to come before the Commission, Motion was made by Mr. Tointon, seconded by Mr. Mielke, to adjourn. Roll call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion passed. The meeting adjourned by unanimous consent at 7:49 P.M. Planning Commission June 26,2024