Parks and Public Works Committee
Regular MeetingPrescott, WI · April 17, 2023
Agenda
CITY OF PRESCOTT
PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
MONDAY, APRIL 17
5:00 PM
MUNICIPAL BUILDING
800 BORNER ST
PRESCOTT, WI 54021
1) Call to Order
2) Roll Call
3) Approve Minutes for March 20, 2023
4) Public Works Items
a) USH 10 & STH 35 Project Update
b) P.I.G./GFL Contract Discussion
5) Parks Items
a) Memorandum of Understanding Updates
i) Fairy Wonderland
ii) Coulee River Trails
b) Phase II of Downtown Riverfront Planning
6) Other Business
7) Adjourn
NOTICE
ACCESS TO THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING FOR THE DISABLED IS
AVAILABLE AT THE MAIN ENTRANCE.
ALL THOSE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS SHOULD CALL CITY HALL OFFICES
(715-262-5544) IF ASSISTANCE IS REQUIRED
IT IS POSSIBLE THAT A QUORUM OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OR
OTHER CITY COMMITTEES MAY BE PRESENT AT THIS MEETING. THIS
IS INCIDENTAL AND NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN BY THE COUNCIL OR
ANY OTHER COMMITTEES.
Parks, and Public Works Committee Meeting Minutes
March 20th, 2023
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the Parks, and Public Property
Committee was held, March 20th, 2023, Municipal Building, 800 Borner Street, Prescott,
Wisconsin 54021. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 pm
Committee Present: Bailey Ruona and John Peterson
Committee Absent: Pat Knox
Staff Present: City Administrator Matt Wolf, Planner Carter Hayes, Public Works Director Mike
Kinneman
Others Present: Members of the public, Cedar Corporation.
1. Approve Minutes for February 20th, 2023.
John Peterson motioned to approve the minutes for February 20th, 2023. Knox
seconded; motion passed without a negative voice (3-0).
2. Public Works Items
A) USH 10 & STH 35 Project Update
At the last Parks and Public Works Committee Meeting the Wisconsin Department of
Transportation (DOT) was present to discuss the upcoming work to US Highway 10 and
State Highway 35. As part of that discussion Cedar Corporation put together a proposal
that would remove the bike lanes on STH 35 from downtown to Wacota Street in order
to install a multi-use trail at a much lower cost than the one previously proposed.
WisDOT stated at the meeting that they would review the proposal and get back to us
with an answer on if the road could be narrower.
City Administrator Matt Wolf presented information regarding the USH 10 & STH 35
Project Update. The WisDOT decided the roadway could not be narrower than 36’. The
City can still pursue the TAP Grant with the WisDOT proposed trail project plan, which
includes a > $1 Million retaining wall. It was explained that the project may not score
well for the grant with a wall contributing to 73% of project cost. Committee Member
Ruona’s perspective is that the City will have to maintain the retaining wall in the future,
which may not be wise. Steve Burt approached the committee for an impromptu public
comment. He addressed how a sidewalk on the North side of STH 35 would be a
disservice to the community. He claimed residents would want to walk across the road
1
for pictures which is unsafe, and request for tree trimming which is on the railroad
property. Committee Member Ruona mentioned the restrictions with a sidewalk and the
adjacent railroad property. Public Works Director Mike Kinneman stated the status of
the railroad retaining wall that is separating from the roadway. It was explained that the
retaining wall is of a dilapidated state. The WisDOT has not stated any responsibility
over the retaining wall south of STH 35 adjacent to the railroad. Steve Burt is opposed
to a sidewalk on the North side of STH 35. It would affect his tenants off-street parking,
and safety on the property.
Committee member Ruona discussed the next steps which include assessing the
integrity of the retaining wall South of STH 35. Ruona also stated the City should
contact a higher position in the DOT to gather a response for a potential trail on STH 35.
B) Non-Improved Dedicated ROW Vacation Discussion
The City of Prescott in the older parts of the community have platted alley rights-of-way.
In many cases theses alleys have been used to give residents located along streets a
secondary access to their property. However, in a few cases the right-of-way is “non-
improved” and creates additional requests for work for our Public Works staff.
City Administrator Matt Wolf presented information regarding the ROW Vacation
Discussion. Committee Member Ruona stated it is something the City should pursue.
Engineer Greg Adams stated the City should look into any public utilities that could be in
the alleyways. Committee Member Ruona favored the approach in which City would
take action as problems in alleyways occur, or let residents petition for vacation.
C) 1832 Canton Road – Garbage Request
The property owners at 1832 Canton Road called to request a larger trash bin in
December of 2022. At that time the owners were requesting an upgrade to a 95-gallon
bin from a 35-gallon bin. However, in talking with staff the owners were told they were
already being billed for a 95- gallon bin and had been billed for that size of bin since
2018. At that time the owners stated that this was the City of Prescott’s mistake and
asked for a 100% credit to their account of $303.53.
City Administrator Matt Wolf presented information regarding the garbage request. Ruth
Gredvig, the homeowner, spoke regarding the garbage request. The City has reached
out to PIG, who does not have any server data previous to the merger with GFL, which
occurred in 2022. The City is not able to verify whether there was a discrepancy in the
data base due to the loss of data. Committee Member Peterson stated the facts of the
situation, which are the resident had a small can and was already paying for a large
can. Peterson stated he was in favor of the full reimbursement of $303.53. Committee
Member Ruona was in agreeance with Committee Member Peterson. Peterson also
stated he would like to see the City diverge from the current garbage contract and have
residents explore their own option.
Committee Member Peterson motioned to bring the matter to Council; Ruona
seconded. Motion passed without a negative voice (2-0)
2
3. Parks Items
A) Pierce County Trash Receptacles at Magee Park
The city currently has 3 large roll-off enclosed dumpsters located at Magee Park. The
dumpsters are owned and managed by the Pierce County Department of Solid Waste &
Recycling. The site has experienced multiple instances of illegal dumping and littering.
The city has looked to relocate the dumpsters to numerous locations recommended by
the County, such as the Highway Department on STH 29, and private business parking
lots. All of which were disallowed by the owners or responsible party.
City Planner Carter Hayes presented information regarding the dumpster relocation.
The Committee favored the relocation of the dumpsters to the upper terrace of the DPW
facility. City Staff will reach out to Pierce County for relocation of the dumpsters.
Committee Member Peterson mentioned getting rid of the USAGAIN clothing drop.
B) Phase II of Downtown Riverfront Planning
Cedar Corporation will be in attendance to discuss planning for Phase II of the
downtown Riverfront Project.
Greg Adams of Cedar Corporation presented information regarding phase II of the
riverfront project. The Project is from the emergency access path by the railroad to the
end of the boat launch along the Mississippi River. The Committee favored bathrooms
by the boat launch, screening the sanitary lift station if it is cost effective, and creating
an ordinance to prohibit fish cleaning at the boat launch. Mike Kinneman mentioned the
City could slurry seal the parking lot rather than a mill & overlay. Ruona stated a trailer
length maximum could be necessary. Mike Kinneman also mentioned cameras should
be placed at the boat launch. A new pavilion at Mercord mill was discussed, a potential
outlook deck could be possible.
4. Other Business
City Planner Carter Hayes presented information regarding the NWS Advanced
Hydrologic Prediction Service’s flood exceedance probabilities for 2023. It was
explained that the City has a 995 chance to exceed a crest of 32.95 feet, which is 7.7
feet higher than the current crest as of 3/20/23. Committee Member Peterson stated he
will attend the Pierce County Emergency Management meeting to determine any
potential actions for flood prevention in the Spring.
Steve Burton addressed a possible utility overcharge during home sales. Committee
Member Ruona stated that City Staff will investigate the matter.
5. Adjourn
Peterson motioned to adjourn. Ruona seconded; motion passed without a
negative voice (2-0) at 7:06 pm
3
To: Parks and Public Works Committee
From: Matt Wolf, City Administrator
Date: April 12, 2023
Subject: Parks and Public Works Committee Memo
All items within the agenda are addressed in the following memo items below.
Discussion
1. USH 10 & STH 35 Project Update – Staff has heard back from the DOT regarding with
the following questions:
a. To make sure we are fully on the same page, the Finance and Maintenance
Agreements need to be signed for the sidewalk on STH 35 and 29 to be put in as
part of the project? Currently, the DOT is working on a statewide state municipal
maintenance agreement (SMMA) revision. For now, DOT will only require
approval signatures on the financial agreement to include the sidewalk with the
projects.
b. If the City ultimately decided not to sign the agreements would both of these
elements (sidewalks along STH 29 & 35) be removed? Yes, when the new
version of the SMMA is available the city will need to sign, or the sidewalk will be
removed.
c. If the underpass of USH 10 was funded or approved as a WisDOT TAP project
would this, then be included in the overall scope of the project or would it be a
separate project that the City would be required to bid/manage? Separate locally
let project managed by the city.
d. Can we look at adding the sidewalk/trail on the riverside of STH 35? Impacts to
the retaining wall, road, guardrail, erosion control, traffic during construction, etc.
would prove to be cost prohibitive most likely as much if not more than the other
side of the street.
e. If the underpass of USH 10 was funded or approved as a WisDOT TAP project
would this, then be included in the overall scope of the project or would it be a
separate project that the City would be required to bid/manage? Separate locally
let project managed by the city.
f. The City discussed the retaining wall on the south side of STH 35 and included
images of the wall. Is this retaining wall scheduled to be included in the overall
scope for replacement? Thank you for the photos and concerns. I have talked
with our region retaining wall structural engineer. He will be inspecting the wall in
early April and will provide work recommendations to be included with this
project.
g. Will the 6’ sidewalk along STH 35 be pushed back 5’ from the curb where
possible? We understand that in the areas where grade doesn’t allow it that it
would be pushed up to the curb to prevent costly retaining walls. Yes, design will
work with the city and the sidewalk will be offset away from the back of the curb
where technically feasible.
2. P.I.G./GFL Contract Discussion – Staff would like to discuss with the Committee the
current contract with P.I.G., which is attached.
3. Memorandums of Understanding - The Committee has requested that representatives
from both the Coulee River Trails and Fairy Wonderland attend the meeting to give
project updates. Currently the City of Prescott has a Memorandum of Understanding
with both of these organizations.
4. Riverfront Phase 2 Planning - Finally, after our last meeting the City is working on
drafting some rough drafts of concept plans for phase 2 of the riverfront. Cedar
Corporation is putting together a rough layout of the area and City Planner Carter Hayes
will be presenting some concepts for ideas of what we could do in the open area next to
the boat launch.
Attachments
1. Contract between the City of Prescott and P.I.G.
The next Parks Committee meeting will be April 17th, 2023.
Respectfully Submitted,
Carter Hayes
Planner
4
Get email alerts for Prescott
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.