Special City Council Meeting

City Of Prosser CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA Council Chambers, 1002 Dudley Avenue, Prosser WA 99350 Tuesday, April 2, 2024 @ 7:00 PM Per Ordinance No. 22-3175, City Council meetings will be held in-person at location listed above and virtually. To join the meeting, please click the following link: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/521570213 You can also dial in using your phone: +1 (872) 240-3412 Access Code: 521-570-213 Get the app now and be ready when the meeting starts: https://global.gotomeeting.com/install/521570213 All members of the public that wish to comment on Council agenda items can contact City Clerk Rachel Shaw via email at rshaw@ci.prosser.wa.us or by phone at (509) 786-8218, no later than 4:00 p.m., the day of the meeting. Please state your first and last name, city of residence and the agenda item on which you wish to comment. Page 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. COUNCIL ACTION a. Consider confirmation of John Markus' appointment as Police Chief. 3-4 Police Chief Confirmation Confirm Mayor Vegar's appointment of John Markus as Chief of Police of the Prosser Police Department. 5. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL REPORTS AND COMMENTS a. Oath of Office, Police Chief John Markus (City Clerk, Rachel Shaw) 5 Police Chief Oath 6. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORTS AND COMMENTS a. State of Recycling Presentation (Rebecca Francik, Basin Disposal, Inc.) 6 - 43 BDI Recycling Presentation b. Wine Country Road Lower Yakima Valley Pathway Connection Project (Public Works Director, Marty Groom) c. Chardonnay Avenue & Merlot Drive Sidewalk Repairs Project (Public Works Director, Marty Groom) Page 1 of 134 7. COUNCIL DISCUSSION a. Review the funding recommendations of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee 44 - 134 (Finance Director, Toni Yost) LTAC Recommendations 8. ADJOURNMENT Page 2 of 134  CITY OF PROSSER, WASHINGTON AGENDA BILL Agenda Title: Meeting Date: Consider confirmation of John Markus' April 2, 2024 appointment as Police Chief. Special City Council Meeting Item Type: Action Department: Director: Contact Person: Phone Number: Administration Gary Vegar Gary Vegar 509-786-8216 Cost of Proposal: Fund Name and Number: 001 - General Fund Amount Budgeted: Included in the Police Operating Budget Reviewed by Finance Department: TY 04/01/2024 Attachments to Agenda Packet Item: N/A Summary Statement: On March 21, 2024, Mayor Vegar offered Interim Chief, John Markus the position of Police Chief following a 3-week internal recruitment process. This recruitment process included the following components: Written Assessment: Interim Chief Markus completed a written assessment which included his written response to three essay questions. His response to these questions were reviewed and evaluated by a team of stakeholders with representatives from City staff, law enforcement agencies, and Prosser partners. Interview Panels: Interim Chief Markus was interviewed by two separate panels; a Community Panel comprised of community stakeholders (Prosser School District, City Council, City Staff, Boys and Girls Club, and Police Department staff) and a Police Panel comprised of representatives for law enforcement and public safety representatives (Grandview, SECOMM Dispatch Center, Police Department staff, West Richland, Benton County Sheriff's Office). After each component, Mayor Vegar reviewed the comments and feedback provided by the panelist and shared the information with Interim Chief Markus to incorporate the input into the Page 3 of 134 work plan for the department. An offer letter was prepared and presented to Interim Chief Markus, of which he accepted. On Friday, March 22, 2022 Mayor Vegar announced his decision to appoint Interim Chief Markus to the position of Police Chief, subject to the confirmation by the City Council. Following the confirmation of Mayor Vegar's appointment, an Oath of Office will be administered by City Clerk, Rachel Shaw. Consistent with Council Goal: Goal #1: Livability & Quality of Life, Goal #5: Operational Excellence & Communication Recommended Action/Suggested Motion: Confirm Mayor Vegar's appointment of John Markus as Chief of Police of the Prosser Police Department. Reviewed by Department Reviewed by City Attorney: Approved by City Director: Administrator: Gary Vegar Howard Saxton Date: Apr 1, 2024 Date: Apr 1, 2024 Date: Page 4 of 134  Oath of Office State of Washington ) )ss County of Benton ) I, John Markus do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution and laws of the State of Washington, and the Ordinances and Policies of the City of Prosser, and that I will faithfully and impartially perform and discharge the duties of the office of Police Chief, according to law, to the best of my ability. ______________________ John Markus Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 2nd day of April, 2024 Attest: ______________________ Rachel M. Shaw,City Clerk Page 5 of 134  Basin Disposal Inc. City of Prosser – Council Report • • rebeccaf@basindisposal.com • Page 6 of 134  Agenda • Basin’s partnership with Prosser • Prosser’s Garbage and Recyclng Services • How Garbage and Recycling work • Recycling Markets – Legislation/costs • Solid Waste – Prosser’s tonnage • Questions Page 7 of 134  Basin is part of your community, donating to: Mainstreet Program Page 8 of 134  Basin provides Residential and Commercial Services Garbage And collection Recycling Page 9 of 134   Residential  Industrial 1,689 customers 33 Customers Avg. 61 lbs/ MSW week = 3,172 lbs./year  Commercial  Recycle 243 Customers Avg. 4 tons/year Page 10 of 134 Commercial and Industrial customers generate 5,550 tons Municipal Solid Waste SW annually using ½ of a route weekly and ¼ of a OCC route  1,062 Commercial Container Collection Trucks Customers Year Cost 3.25 Daily MSW routes 2023 $489,747 2021 $487,053 1.25 Daily OCC routes 2019 $434,038 2017 $392,097 Approximately 27,000 tons of MSW 2014 $342,204 collected annually 2013 $299,065 2011 $216,973 2009 $202,343 2005 $132,034 Since 2017, the cost has increased by 25% Page 11 of 134 Capital Borrowing – 8.25%  Garbage is:  Stable • Major Cost components are:  Predictable  Labor  required for public health and safety  Equipment  Regulated  Fuel  Rates are adjusted annually for CPI  Tipping fees  Fuel surcharges are added when the price spikes above formulaic change in your contract price Page 12 of 134  Partnership with • Goal: • Provide Excellent customer service the City • Maximize efficiency • Minimize Service Costs through • Unlimited Garbage Collection – • Efficiency - uniform can sizes • Unlimited service model reduces illegal dumping Page 13 of 134  Garbage Service  Unlimited Residential Service  No Charge for Extras  Bag, Boxed, Bundled  Bulky Items: OK  Couches, Appliances, Refrigerators  Basin appreciates a heads up so they can deploy a larger truck  Minimal Charge ($4.16) for 2nd 96gal cart  Specialized Disposal performed at Page 14 of 134 cost (example Freon removal)  Recycling – 2 Flavors Any material that:  comes from a plant  an animal and is biodegradable Think Compost Page 15 of 134 10  Recycling – 2nd Flavor • Inorganics – does not contain organic compounds -difficult to decompose by microorganisms • Plastics and polyester clothing • Study says “Wearing Polyester clothes sheds more microplastics than washing Page 16 of 134 11  Recycling Market Very Little Regulation • a true recycling market costs money to: • Transport recycling to a MRF (manufacture reuse facility) • Transport clean recycling to manufacturer • process recycling into a new product • Sell the new Product Reporting requirements Weak • leading to Fraud Markets are commodity driven • recycling prices changes monthly • consumer costs change monthly Page 17 of 134  Illegal Hauling Page 18 of 134 13  Could be recycled but how much labor? Page 19 of 134 14  Ask the neighbors about their property value Comments to Ecology about Anderson Pit https://tcp.ecology.commentinput.com/?id=6UgFt https://www.yakimaherald.com/opinion/opinion-lack-of- oversight-means-problems-grow-thrive/article_bc5c7a30-b2ea- 11ed-b0eb-932a27a9b2bc.html Page 20 of 134 https://www.nwpb.org/2023/04/17/underground-fire-harmful- fumes-prompt-cleanup-plan-for-yakima-landfill/ 15  So it must be cheaper right? Page 21 of 134 Where do Trash Bandits take their paint? Benton County Household hazardous waste for free? Without paying the tax that supports the facility? 16  Recycling • Monitored 20 hours/week • TransferRecycling Containers (30yd Drop Boxes) for the public to use • Transfer Station – 1 voucher per residential property per year • Prosser pays the transportation and commodity costs of recycling Page 22 of 134  Recycling is also a Commodity • Residential mix generally means: • mixed paper, • plastics 1, 2, & 5, - Prosser does not take plastic • Aluminum and Tin Cans • Every month Basin is given an estimated price for our recycling () means number is negative. • In other words February’s quote lets you know you will have to pay $80/ton Page 23 of 134  Recycle Market – Trend Page 24 of 134 Page 25 of 134  Legislative Considerations 2023 – WRAP ACT Intent – to recycle all used items Concerns - No market for plastics 3-7 Page 26 of 134 21  Contamination Matters Only recycle jars and wine bottles Page 27 of 134  Quality Matters! • Waste haulers propose large clearly labeled truth in packaging labels • Clear statements – this is garbage • Or • This can be recycled • Basin is currently working with Glass packaging institute to see if we can recycle wine bottles • Strategic materials in Seattle will only take CLEAN glass – no contaminants such as plastics, porcelain, pyrex etc. • This may lead to residential recycling but only if people can resist contamination Page 28 of 134 23  What about other kinds of Recycling • 1st check Benton County • https://www.bentoncountywa.gov/pview.aspx?id=715&catid=0 • 2nd Check • Call Basin Disposal - Phone: (509) 547-2476 • Still don’t know? • Check ecology website – remember recycling is local so not everything offered in King county is available in Benton County. https://ecology.wa.gov/waste-toxics/reducing-recycling-waste/how-to-recycle Page 29 of 134  Recycling Market – Public Desire-Driving Policy  U.S Recycling Goals  Disposal Cost/Ton  Increase recycling rate to 50% by 2030  MSW: $ 59.53  WAState Laws and Goals  RCY: $ Market Rate  Divert 75% of organics from landfills by  Jan 24, -$74.00 2025  Feb 24, -$80/ton  producer responsibility for products that cannot be recycled  March 24 -$77/ton  Recommended Incremental approach  truth in labeling  infrastructure needs assessment Page 30 of 134  Legislative Considerations: • HB1799 – 2022 Organics Management Law • By 2025, 20% of previously disposed edible food must be recovered for consumption, relative to 2015 levels • By 2030, 75% of previously disposed organic materials must be diverted from landfills, relative to 2015 levels. • Intent: to get methane out of atmosphere by removing organics from landfills • Reason: Methane is a potent GHG that has ~84 times the global warming potential of C02 over a 20-year period • What does it mean for Prosser? Page 31 of 134 26  Cost Drivers  EV Fleets currently not available, only able to haul ½ the load meaning 2 trucks for every 1 diesel or RNG truck  Curbside recycling  Mandatory always makes it more affordable  Councils usually request subscription  Organics recycling – requires separate pickup and facility to deliver to  HB 1799  HB 2301 Page 32 of 134  Benton County is in….. Why is Prosser exempt? You aren’t currently collecting food waste You don’t have curbside Organics collection There is no composting or Anaerobic digesting facility close by Page 33 of 134 28  Long term vs. Short Term Costs • You decide • Pay to recycle • Pay to build a new landfill • Richland 2019 paid ~ $5,000,000 to develop 18 acres of new landfill cell • disposal capacity of about 600,000 tons • Richland currently disposes of roughly 70,000 tons/year • Pay to clean up trash: • in oceans – damaging marine environment • along roadsides and in waterways • Illegal dumping – contributes to West Nile and other diseases • Your purchasing power directly impacts recycling and landfills • Where will your next purchase end up when you are done with it? Page 34 of 134  Collections Garbage Tons Recycle Tons 2016- 2017- 2022- Commodity 2016- 2017- 2022- Service 2017 2018 2023 Tons 2017 2018 2023 Residential Customers 2538 2629 2,993 Commingled 121 115 37 Commercial Customers 1710 1758 2,092 cardboard 438 359 91 Industrial Customers 3573 2690 3,457 Page 35 of 134  Collections (Cont.) Page 36 of 134  Basin believes True Recycling is do-able • Need: • Enforcement • Time to develop infrastructure for organics • Compost Beds • Markets for compost • Anaerobic digesters • Long term markets for RNG • Public understanding and $$$ a willingness to pay for these new infrastructure facilities. Based on the California model this could be as high as $60/month for 2 cans • Garbage • Green Waste Page 37 of 134 32  • The WRAP act proposed putting producers in charge of all packaging with an unrestricted ability to charge customers for all disposal The • Waste haulers proposed: • Packagers pay market rate for all recycling as it Problem is comes through the MRFs • Producers must take title to all unsold recycling plastics • Intent: If producers cannot find market for empty containers they have no incentives to change their packing Page 38 of 134 33  Plastic Industry trend projections – imarc https://www.imarcgroup.com/plastics-market • Drivers of expanding markets • Global Market Expectations – 3.18% • rising demand for ready-to-eat (RTE) food products growth rate during 2023-2028 due to hectic lifestyles and busy schedules • widespread product adoption in the automotive industry to manufacture vehicle components • improve fuel efficiency 03/06/2022 - The • reduce weight • enhance safety amount of plastic • minimize noise waste produced • lower production costs globally is on track • increasing demand for engineering plastics that offer: to almost triple by • excellent load capacity 2060, with around • thermal stability • mechanical strength half ending up in • durability landfill and less • widespread product demand for manufacturing Page 39 of 134 composite materials as a replacement for metals, than a fifth such as steel and aluminum, recycled, according 34  Benton county Solid Waste What illegal Tax - 4.5% hauling Washington costs you State Refuse Tax – 3.6% the taxpayer? Prosser City • 5% to General Fund used to manage garbage accounts utility tax – 7% • 2% Street fund Page 40 of 134 35  Things to think about • Putting producers in charge of the recycling program does not provide independent verification • Recycling needs to be taxed just like solid Waste (state reg) • We can make a difference • Collecting green waste and organics • Challenge – need facilities to deal with organics • Will consumers pay for recycling? • How do we stop illegal hauling? • Why are people illegally dropping oil and paint at the transfer station? Page 41 of 134 36 Questions? Page 42 of 134  Truth In Labeling: The PBS Frontline Documentary “Plastic Wars” & NPR “How Big Oil Misled The Public Into Believing Plastic Would Be Recycled” explains how plastic producers have mislead the public by labeling their plastics recyclable for decades. Now, like California with SB 343 (2021), we need better labeling standards to reduce consumer confusion and ensure items labeled recyclable are truly recyclable through Washington’s curbside programs. Why Truth in labeling matters Page 43 of 134  CITY OF PROSSER, WASHINGTON AGENDA BILL Agenda Title: Meeting Date: Review the funding recommendations of the April 2, 2024 Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. City Council Work Session Item Type: Discussion Department: Director: Contact Person: Phone Number: Finance Toni Yost Toni Yost 509-786-2332 Cost of Proposal: Fund Name and Number: $14,050 130 - Hotel/Motel and 131 - TPA Amount Budgeted: $54,424 Reviewed by Finance Department: TY 03/28/2024 Attachments to Agenda Packet Item: 1. Draft LTAC meeting minutes for March 27, 2024 2. March 27th LTAC Meeting Packet Summary Statement: The Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) recently opened up the funding application 2024 LTAC funds because there were remaining budget funds unallocated at the end of the last application process. On March 27th the LTAC reviewed with applicants the funding requests received. Following their presentations the LTAC discussed each proposal and how (or if) the proposed expenditure fit within the parameters set by the Council. Below are the recommendation so the LTAC committee: Recommend funding for the Prosser Wine Network as follows: Hotel/Motel Funds: $5,000 TPA Funds: $0 TOTAL = $5,000 The Committee wanted to remind the applicant that funding is provided to start the event and it is expected that future requests will be new or different activities. The Committee would like to see the supported events be sustainable, without additional LTAC support. Page 44 of 134 Recommend funding for the Prosser Community Float as follows: Hotel/Motel Funds: $0 TPA Funds: $0 TOTAL = $0 The Committee declined to provide funding for this program as it was determined to not result in hotel stays sufficient to warrant funding. Recommend funding for the Prosser Chamber of Commerce as follows: Hotel/Motel Funds: $5,000 TPA Funds: $0 TOTAL = $5,000 This funding can be used as requested on the application with the added stipulation that they work cooperatively with Historic Downtown Prosser to seek a discount on marketing services. This funding can be used as requested on the application. The committee requested that efforts be made by the Chamber of Commerce to collect information to determine the effectiveness of this additional marketing effort. Future funding will be determined based on the success or failure of the campaign and based on the Chamber’s ability to quantify the results. Recommend funding for Historic Downtown Prosser (Girl’s Derby Day) as follows: Hotel/Motel Funds: $550 TPA Funds: $0 TOTAL = $550 This funding can be used as requested on the application with the added stipulation that they work cooperatively with the Prosser Chamber of Commerce to seek a discount on marketing services. The committee requested that efforts be made by HDP to collect information to determine the effectiveness of this additional marketing effort and if the event generates overnight stays. Future funding will be determined based on the success or failure of the campaign and based on HDP’s ability to quantify the results. Recommend funding for Historic Downtown Prosser (Banners) as follows: Hotel/Motel Funds: $3,500 TPA Funds: $0 TOTAL = $3,500 This funding can be used as requested on the application with the added stipulation proofs of the final banner designed be approved by a majority of the LTAC prior to expenditure. Council has the authority to return the return these recommendations to the LTAC with addition instruction or Council could choose to accept the recommendations and direct staff to prepare funding agreements consistent with the recommendation. Consistent with Council Goal: Goal #1: Livability & Quality of Life, Goal #2: Financial Sustainability, Goal #3: Promote Economic Development & Jobs, Goal #5: Operational Excellence & Communication Recommended Action/Suggested Motion: Page 45 of 134 Review the funding recommendations of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. Reviewed by Department Reviewed by City Attorney: Approved by City Director: Administrator: Toni Yost N/A Date: Mar 28, 2024 Date: Date: Page 46 of 134  CITY OF PROSSER, WASHINGTON LODGING TAX ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES WEDNESDAY, MARCH 27, 2024 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Chairman Carolina Licano. ROLL CALL Chairman Carolina Licano, Committee Members Julie Mercer, Keith Sattler, Sue Derryberry and Tom Denlea were present. Also in attendance were Finance Director Yost and City Clerk Rachel Shaw. DECEMBER 19, 2023 MINUTES A motion was made by Committee Member Denlea , seconded by Committee Member Sattler to approve the December 19, 2023 minutes. Motion carried. FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND BUDGET Finance Director Yost reviewed with committee members funding goals and priorities established by Council and funds available for allocation. Additionally, time was taken to review the allowable uses for the lodging taxes collected. PROSSER WINE NETWORK Monica Martinez was present representing the Prosser Wine Network. They submitted an additional funding request for $5,000 that will be used to support some additional event related costs which were not anticipated. Expenses include porta potties, insurance, banners and additional marketing. The event, called the Prosser Wine and Music Weekends will span three days and include approximately 19 local wineries. Each location will host a different band and there will be a headliner event on Saturday evening. They have am attendance goal of 800. PROSSER COMMUNITY FLOAT No one was in attendance to present on behalf of the Prosser Community Float application. PROSSER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE APPLICATION FOR FUNDING Lindsee Curfman, Executive Director of the Prosser Chamber of Commerce submitted an application for $5,000 to support radio marketing for events. Executive Director Curfman explained that in the past radio advertising had not been utilized and believes it may be a fruitful addition to their marketing efforts. She went on to explain that she will monitor ticket sales and the location of those sales to see how they overlap with the broadcast areas of the radio marketing to determine the impact of the additional marketing effort. She also added that she will work with the radio producers to ensure that advertisement are timed effectively to ensure “heads in beds” and make sure advertisements and placed on appropriate radio stations. 1|Page Page 47 of 134 HISTORIC DOWNTOWN PROSSER APPLICATION FOR FUNDING Melinda DeSanto, Executive Director of the Historic Downtown Prosser submitted two separate applications for the committee’s review. The first application of $1,200 supported radio marketing for Girl’s Derby Day event. This is the second year of the event and they are making changes to the event to encourage “heads in beds”. Those changes include that the event will be ticketed so they can better determine if overnight stays are being generated by this event. They have also added a yoga event on Sunday to further encourage people to stay overnight in Prosser. They believe the marketing package offered by the radio station will help ensure the event is successful. Finance Director Yost asked if HDP had considered working cooperatively with the Prosser Chamber of Commerce to market their event as the scope of their two requests were so similar and even with the same radio station. This may provide each agency a larger discount and ensure efficient use of LTAC funds. Executive Director DeSanto explained that due in the timing of the different events, a cooperative approach might not be possible. The second application of $3,500 would support 28 banners within the Historic Downtown Prosser’s boundaries. The goal of the banners is to entice visitors to visit downtown Prosser. The banners are still being designed, but samples were provided to the committee for review. Executive Director DeSanto provided a map which identified the proposed locations for the banners. FUNDING RECOMENDATION Motion by Committee Member Denlea, seconded by Committee Member Mercer to: Recommend funding for the Prosser Wine Network as follows: Hotel/Motel Funds: $5,000 TPA Funds: $0 TOTAL = $5,000 The Committee wanted to remind the applicant that funding is provided to start the event and it is expected that future requests will be new or different activities. The Committee would like to see the supported events be sustainable, without additional LTAC support. Recommend funding for the Prosser Community Float as follows: Hotel/Motel Funds: $0 TPA Funds: $0 TOTAL = $0 The Committee declined to provide funding for this program as it was determined to not result in hotel stays sufficient to warrant funding. Recommend funding for the Prosser Chamber of Commerce as follows: Hotel/Motel Funds: $5,000 TPA Funds: $0 TOTAL = $5,000 This funding can be used as requested on the application with the added stipulation that they work cooperatively with Historic Downtown Prosser to seek a discount on marketing services. This funding can be used as requested on the application. The committee requested that efforts be made by the 2|Page Page 48 of 134 Chamber of Commerce to collect information to determine the effectiveness of this additional marketing effort. Future funding will be determined based on the success or failure of the campaign and based on the Chamber’s ability to quantify the results. Recommend funding for Historic Downtown Prosser (Girl’s Derby Day) as follows: Hotel/Motel Funds: $550 TPA Funds: $0 TOTAL = $550 This funding can be used as requested on the application with the added stipulation that they work cooperatively with the Prosser Chamber of Commerce to seek a discount on marketing services. The committee requested that efforts be made by HDP to collect information to determine the effectiveness of this additional marketing effort and if the event generates overnight stays. Future funding will be determined based on the success or failure of the campaign and based on HDP’s ability to quantify the results. Recommend funding for Historic Downtown Prosser (Banners) as follows: Hotel/Motel Funds: $3,500 TPA Funds: $0 TOTAL = $3,500 This funding can be used as requested on the application with the added stipulation proofs of the final banner designed be approved by a majority of the LTAC prior to expenditure. This motion was carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT At 6:53 p.m., Committee Chair Licano adjourned the meeting of the Prosser LTAC as there was no further business to discuss. ________________________________ ________________________________ Council Member Carolina Licano Finance Director, Toni Yost LTAC Committee Chair 3|Page Page 49 of 134 Prosser Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) Wednesday, March 27, 2024 at 5:30 PM Public Participation: City of Prosser Council Chambers 1002 Dudley Ave, Prosser, WA 99350 Per Ordinance 20-3122, all City Council meetings will be held 1. Call To Order remotely until further notice. The City asks all members of the 2. Minutes of December 19, 2023 Meeting public that wish to comment on an agenda items, to please contact Finance Director Yost 3. Review of Applications via email at tyost@ci.prosser.wa.us or by a. Prosser Wine Network phone at (509) 786-8215, no b. Prosser Float later than 4:00 p.m., the day of c. Prosser Chamber of Commerce the meeting. Please state your d. Historic Downtown Prosser (2 applications) first and last name, city of residence and agenda item you 4. Recommendation wish to comment on. 5. Adjournment To join the LTAC meeting, Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. https://meet.goto.com/29685780 � You can also dial in using your phone. Access Code: 296-857-805 United States: + 1 (646} 749-3122 Get the app now and be ready when your first meeting starts: https://meet.goto.com/install Pl Page 50 of 134 Page 51 of 134 Page 52 of 134 Page 53 of 134 Page 54 of 134 Page 55 of 134 Page 56 of 134 Page 57 of 134 Page 58 of 134 March 10, 2024 Second Round LTAC ask for additional funds for the Prosser Wine Network Music Weekend Festival Banners: $500 Additional marketing: $1,000 Logo Disposable Glasses: $1,000 Additional band: $500 Additional Porta Potties: $500 Insurance: $1,000 Event Licensing: $500 Total: $5,000 P9A Page 59 of 134 Page 60 of 134 Page 61 of 134 Page 62 of 134 Page 63 of 134 Page 64 of 134 Page 65 of 134 Page 66 of 134 Page 67 of 134 Page 68 of 134 Page 69 of 134 Page 70 of 134 Page 71 of 134 Page 72 of 134 Page 73 of 134 Page 74 of 134 Page 75 of 134 Page 76 of 134 Page 77 of 134 Page 78 of 134 Page 79 of 134 Page 80 of 134 Page 81 of 134 Page 82 of 134 Page 83 of 134 Page 84 of 134 Page 85 of 134 Page 86 of 134 Page 87 of 134 Page 88 of 134 Page 89 of 134 Page 90 of 134 Page 91 of 134 Page 92 of 134 Page 93 of 134 Page 94 of 134 Page 95 of 134 Page 96 of 134 Page 97 of 134 Page 98 of 134 Page 99 of 134 Page 100 of 134 Page 101 of 134 Page 102 of 134 Page 103 of 134 Page 104 of 134 Page 105 of 134 Page 106 of 134 Page 107 of 134 Page 108 of 134 Page 109 of 134 Page 110 of 134 Page 111 of 134 Page 112 of 134 Page 113 of 134 Page 114 of 134 Page 115 of 134 Page 116 of 134 Page 117 of 134 Page 118 of 134 Page 119 of 134 Page 120 of 134 Page 121 of 134 Page 122 of 134 Page 123 of 134 Page 124 of 134 Page 125 of 134 Page 126 of 134 Page 127 of 134 Page 128 of 134 Page 129 of 134 Page 130 of 134 Page 131 of 134 Page 132 of 134 Page 133 of 134 Page 134 of 134