Planning Commission
Regular MeetingProvo, UT · May 14, 2025
Minutes
Provo City Planning Commission
Report of Action
May 14, 2025
ITEM 1 Guilford A Rand requests a Conditional Use Permit to allow a reception center use (SLU 6299) in an
existing commercial building in the CG (General Commercial) Zone, located at 1595 N Freedom Blvd.
Carterville Neighborhood. Nancy Robison (801) 852-6417 PLCUP20240244
The following action was taken by the Planning Commission on the above described item at its regular meeting of May
14, 2025:
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
On a vote of 5:0, the Planning Commission approved the above noted application, with the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. A business license is obtained and maintained.
2. The applicant must have a valid lease agreement for the extra 22 parking spaces as long as the business is
operating. The extra spaces are from the property to the south. Parcel number 19:068:0033
3. The occupancy is capped at 152 persons, using the calculation One (1) space per four (4) persons based on the
maximum allowable occupancy. Provo City Code 14.37.060
4. The center is allowed to operate until 10:00 pm.
5. Temporary signage is placed to define allowed parking areas during high volume events.
Motion By: Melissa Kendall
Second By: Anne Allen
Votes in Favor of Motion: Jonathon Hill, Daniel Gonzales, Melissa Kendall, Lisa Jensen, Anne Allen.
Jonathon Hill was present as Chair.
• Includes facts of the case, analysis, conclusions and recommendations outlined in the Staff Report, with any changes
noted; Planning Commission determination is generally consistent with the Staff analysis and determination.
STAFF PRESENTATION
The Staff Report to the Planning Commission provides details of the facts of the case and the Staff's analysis, conclusions,
and recommendations.
CITY DEPARTMENTAL ISSUES
• The Coordinator Review Committee (CRC) has reviewed the application and given their approval.
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING DATE
• The Neighborhood District Chair determined that a neighborhood meeting would not be required.
NEIGHBORHOOD AND PUBLIC COMMENT
• The Neighborhood District Chair was present /addressed the Planning Commission during the public hearing.
• Neighbors or other interested parties were present or addressed the Planning Commission.
CONCERNS RAISED BY PUBLIC
Any comments received prior to completion of the Staff Report are addressed in the Staff Report to the Planning
Commission. Key issues raised in written comments received subsequent to the Staff Report or public comment during
the public hearing included the following:
Page 1 of 2
• They would not like it to become an event center that will create problems like the Enigma or the Experience
Event Center.
• Many comments were made about the quality of the Beehive Bazaar and that they had attended it themselves.
• Comments were also made that they appreciated what the Bazaar did to help and encourage young artists or
entrepreneurs.
• Many people appreciate the way the business owners have run events in the past in different locations. That they
were good neighbors, clean, and dedicated to making it a great experience.
• Commentors felt that having this business here would improve Provo and using this location will also improve
an eyesore that has remained vacant for several years.
APPLICANT RESPONSE
Key points addressed in the applicant's presentation to the Planning Commission included the following:
• They would like to have a permanent location for their Bazaar, and feel they will create a nice event center that
could be used for weddings, workshops and even a place where sets could be temporarily installed for the
entertainment industry. (Television, Movies etc.).
• They want to be good neighbors so they will do what they can to keep parking on their lot and the adjoining one
to the south.
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Key points discussed by the Planning Commission included the following:
• Planning commission members are enthusiastic about seeing an eyesore leave Provo and for the Bazaar to move
into a permanent location.
• Several members have been to that event and have children who have participated in it. They also had great
experiences with both.
• Discussion was raised about an alleyway to the south of the property, and staff said they would look into that
property and how to fix any problems.
• The planning commission discussed adding temporary signage about parking to keep vehicles coming to the event
space out of the neighborhoods to the north and west.
Planning Commission Chair
Director of Development Services
See Key Land Use Policies of the Provo City General Plan, applicable Titles of the Provo City Code, and the Staff Report
to the Planning Commission for further detailed information. The Staff Report is a part of the record of the decision
of this item. Where findings of the Planning Commission differ from findings of Staff, those will be noted in this
Report of Action.
Legislative items are noted with an asterisk (*) and require legislative action by the Municipal Council following a public
hearing; the Planning Commission provides an advisory recommendation to the Municipal Council following a public
hearing.
Administrative decisions of the Planning Commission (items not marked with an asterisk) may be appealed by submitting
an application/notice of appeal, with the required application and noticing fees to the Development Services
Department, 445 W Center Street, Provo, Utah, within fourteen (14) calendar days of the Planning Commission's
decision (Provo City office hours are Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.).
BUILDING PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS
Page 2 of 2
Provo City Planning Commission
Report of Action
May 14, 2025
*ITEM 2 Wendy Holdaway requests Ordinance Text Amendments to Provo City Code 14.30 to allow for homes on
the Landmarks Registry to be exempt from providing covered parking structures for Accessory Dwelling
Units. Citywide Application. Dustin Wright (801) 852-6414 dwright@provo.gov PLOTA20250179
The following action was taken by the Planning Commission on the above described item at its regular meeting of May
14, 2025:
RECOMMENDED APPROVAL
On a vote of 5:0, the Planning Commission recommended that the Municipal Council approve the above noted application.
Motion By: Lisa Jensen
Second By: Daniel Gonzales
Votes in Favor of Motion: Lisa Jensen, Daniel Gonzales, Jonathon Hill, Anne Allen, Melissa Kendall
Jonathon Hill was present as Chair.
• Includes facts of the case, analysis, conclusions and recommendations outlined in the Staff Report, with any changes
noted; Planning Commission determination is generally consistent with the Staff analysis and determination.
TEXT AMENDMENT
The text of the proposed amendment is attached as Exhibit A.
STAFF PRESENTATION
The Staff Report to the Planning Commission provides details of the facts of the case and the Staff's analysis, conclusions,
and recommendations.
CITY DEPARTMENTAL ISSUES
• The Coordinator Review Committee (CRC) has reviewed the application and given their approval.
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING DATE
• Citywide Application; all Neighborhood District Chairs received notification.
NEIGHBORHOOD AND PUBLIC COMMENT
• This item was City-wide or affected multiple neighborhoods.
• Neighbors or other interested parties were present or addressed the Planning Commission.
CONCERNS RAISED BY PUBLIC
Any comments received prior to completion of the Staff Report are addressed in the Staff Report to the Planning
Commission. Key issues raised in written comments received subsequent to the Staff Report or public comment during
the public hearing included the following:
• No comments from the public were made.
APPLICANT RESPONSE
Key points addressed in the applicant's presentation to the Planning Commission included the following:
• The applicant was unable to attend the hearing, so her sister and nephew were there to support the item and answer
any questions.
Page 1 of 3
• Her property does not have enough room for the garage or carport.
• Adding them to the property would detract from the structure.
• The home is made with adobe, and new construction would be challenging.
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Key points discussed by the Planning Commission included the following:
• Allowing this will help ensure that there is owner occupancy.
• There are less than fifty properties that this amendment could apply to, and not all of them would need to make use
of it.
• This is a good incentive for keeping properties on the Historic Register.
• Historic properties with garages would potentially be able to use the existing garage space for an ADU.
Planning Commission Chair
Director of Development Services
See Key Land Use Policies of the Provo City General Plan, applicable Titles of the Provo City Code, and the Staff Report
to the Planning Commission for further detailed information. The Staff Report is a part of the record of the decision
of this item. Where findings of the Planning Commission differ from findings of Staff, those will be noted in this
Report of Action.
Legislative items are noted with an asterisk (*) and require legislative action by the Municipal Council following a public
hearing; the Planning Commission provides an advisory recommendation to the Municipal Council following a public
hearing.
Administrative decisions of the Planning Commission (items not marked with an asterisk) may be appealed by submitting
an application/notice of appeal, with the required application and noticing fees to the Development Services
Department, 445 W Center Street, Provo, Utah, within fourteen (14) calendar days of the Planning Commission's
decision (Provo City office hours are Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.).
BUILDING PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS
Page 2 of 3
EXHIBIT A
Page 3 of 3
Agenda
PROVO CITY CORPORATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning Commission Agenda
May 14, 2025
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION
The Provo City Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on May 14, 2025 at 6:00 PM. Located at:
Council Chambers 445 West Center Street. The items listed below will be discussed, and anyone interested
is invited to participate and provide comment. Hearings can be viewed live and on-demand at: YouTube
youtube.com/user/ProvoChannel17 and on Facebook facebook.com/provochannel17.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING BEFORE PROVO MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
On Tuesday, June 3, 2025, at 5:30 PM. the Provo Municipal Council will consider the items noted below
with a star (*). Items noted on the agendas with a star require legislative action by the Municipal Council.
Council agendas can be viewed at the Provo City Council web site on the Thursday prior to the Council
meeting at http://agendas.provo.gov. For more information, call (801) 852-6120.
Unmarked items are administrative and require the approval only of the Planning Commission. Decisions
on the unmarked items may be appealed to the Board of Adjustment by making application by 6:00 PM.
within 14 days of the Planning Commission decision.
Study Session
1. Station Area Plans Discussion - Mary Barnes, Jessica Dahneke, and Hannah Salzl
Public Hearings
Item 1 Guilford A Rand requests a Conditional Use Permit to allow a reception center
use (SLU 6299) in an existing commercial building in the CG (General
Commercial) Zone, located at 1595 N Freedom Blvd. Carterville Neighborhood.
Nancy Robison (801) 852-6417 PLCUP20240244
*Item 2 Wendy Holdaway requests Ordinance Text Amendments to Provo City Code
14.30 to allow for homes on the Landmarks Registry to be exempt from
providing covered parking structures for Accessory Dwelling Units. Citywide
Application. Dustin Wright (801) 852-6414 dwright@provo.gov PLOTA20250179
Preceding the public hearing, there will be a Study Session at 5:00 PM. at the Provo Peak Conference Room,
445 W Center Street. The Study Session is open to the public; however, formal presentation of items, public
comment and actions will be reserved for the public hearing at 6:00 PM.
To send public comments to Planning Commission members, email them at dspublichearings@provo.gov.
Please submit public comment emails before 3:00 PM the day of the hearing. Additional information can
be found at provo.gov/publiccomments.
Copies of the agenda materials, public hearing procedure, and staff recommendations are available the
week of the hearing at a reasonable cost at 445 W Center Street, Suite 200, Provo between the hours of
7:00 AM. and 6:00 PM., Monday through Thursday. Agendas and staff recommendations are also
generally available on the Provo City Development Services web site the week of the meeting at
provo.gov/planningcommission.
Provo City will make reasonable accommodations for all citizens interested in participating in this meeting.
If assistance is needed to allow participation at this meeting, please call the Development Services
Department at (801) 852-6400 before 12:00 PM. the day before the meeting to make arrangements.
By order of the Provo City Planning Commission
Planning Secretary, (801) 852-6424
Planning Commission Hearing
Staff Report
Hearing Date: May 14,2025
ITEM 1 Guilford A Rand requests a Conditional Use Permit to allow a reception center use (SLU
6299) in an existing commercial building in the CG (General Commercial) Zone, located at
1595 N Freedom Blvd. Carterville Neighborhood. Nancy Robison (801) 852-6417
PLCUP20240244
Applicant: BEEHIVE BAZAAR LLC THE Current Legal Use: The current property is
Guilford A Rand zoned General Commercial (CG) and has been
vacant for a period of time.
Staff Coordinator: Nancy Robison
Relevant History: This building was
Property Owner: THE BEEHIVE constructed in 1978 and has been used by
BAZAAR LLC several different automotive related companies.
An Administrative Hearing was held on April 2,
2025. The item was continued, to be able to
Parcel ID#:19:068:0017 resolve parking issues.
Acreage:0.44 Neighborhood Issues: Neighbors are concerned
about noise in the late evening hours for an event
Number of Properties: 1 center. They are also concerned about parking.
Because there is an event center already in the
neighborhood, they feel like one more would
Number of Lots:1 exacerbate the problems, especially if both were
holding an event at the same time.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Continue to a future date to obtain
additional information or to further Summary of Key Issues: A conditional use
consider information presented. The next permit is required under Provo City Code
available meeting date is May 28, 2025 14.22.020 for the General Commercial Zone
5:00 P.M. (CG). The planned use is Reception Center,
Standard Land Use Code (SLU) 6299.
2. Deny the requested variance. This
action would not be consistent with the
recommendations of the Staff Report. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends
The Planning Commission should state approval with the following conditions.
new findings. • Capacity is capped at 152 since there are
38 available parking spaces.
• A business license is obtained.
• The lease agreement for parking is
renewed/or stays in effect for as long as
the business is operating.
• Hours of operation are clearly defined.
Planning Commission Staff Report Item 1
May 14, 2025 Page 2
OVERVIEW
The applicant requests a conditional use permit to operate a multi-use event space. The
proposed uses include a handmade craft market three times a year, as well as utilizing the
facility for receptions, family gatherings and corporate events. This property has been vacant for
some time, and accepting this proposal will reuse an existing commercial building.
The applicants have signed a two-year contract to lease 22 spaces from the property owners to
the south. Two of those spaces will be used to create egress from the property to maintain the
flow of traffic. The other 20 will be for parking. This would limit the occupancy to 152 individuals
to be in compliance with Provo City code.
The property to the south (Ihub) includes approximately 42,000 sq feet, which would require
them to have 70 parking spaces. They currently have 165 parking spaces so they will continue
to have adequate parking for their use.
It is important to note that this conditional use permit would not be considered the same as a
dance hall. It would be treated as an event center. This project aligns with the continuing need
for community event space and will enhance the area with added economic and social
opportunities. By signing below, the applicant acknowledges that the facility may not be used
as a dance hall.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The subject property is zoned General Commercial (CG).
2. The parking stalls are limited to 38 so the occupancy will be capped at 152 individuals.
(According to Provo City code 14.37.060 Parking spaces required for the equivalent of
an event space.)
3. All CRC issues have been resolved.
4. The applicant has a lease agreement with the property owners to the south for a period
of two years. This lease agreement would need to be renewed as long as the business
is operating.
5. The applicant will need to acquire a business license.
STAFF ANALYSIS
Conditional Use Permits are subject to compliance with 14.02.040. Responses are in bold.
The ordinance, in part, is as follows:
(1) The Planning Commission may, subject to the procedures and standards set forth in
this Chapter, grant, conditionally grant, or deny an application for a Conditional Use
Permit for uses allowed by the chapter for the applicable zone. The purpose of a
Conditional Use Permit is to allow proper integration of uses into the community
which may only be suitable in specific locations and may have potentially detrimental
characteristics if not properly designed, located, and conditioned.
(2) The following standards shall apply to any request for a Conditional Use Permit:
Planning Commission Staff Report Item 1
May 14, 2025 Page 3
(a) A proposed conditional use shall be granted unless the subject use will be
detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing in the
vicinity or injurious to property in the vicinity.
The subject property has direct access to Freedom Blvd. It seems unlikely
that patron traffic would impact Moon River Drive. The subject property is
in an existing commercial zone. The closest residential use, a duplex, is
approximately 110 feet away to the east. Due to these factors, staff believe
the proposed multi-use event space will not be detrimental to the health,
safety, or general welfare of persons residing in the vicinity or injurious to
property in the vicinity.
(b) A proposed conditional use shall be detrimental to the health, safety, or
general welfare of persons residing in the vicinity or injurious to property in the
vicinity:
(i) if the proposed use will cause unreasonable risks to the safety of
persons or property because of vehicular traffic or parking, large
gatherings of people, or other causes;
The proposed operation will not cause unreasonable risk to the
safety of persons or property because of vehicular traffic for the
reasons listed above. On-site parking meeting code requirements
with a lease for additional spaces.
(ii) if the proposed use will unreasonably interfere with the lawful use of
surrounding property;
The proposed use will not unreasonably interfere with the lawful use
of surrounding property. The applicant’s property is sufficient for
the operation. The property is surrounded by commercial uses on all
the adjacent land.
(iv) if the proposed use will in any other way be detrimental to the health,
safety or general welfare of persons residing in the vicinity or injurious to
property in the vicinity.
The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or
general welfare of persons residing in the vicinity or injurious to
property in the vicinity.
(c) A change in the market value of real estate shall not be a basis for the denial
of a proposed conditional use.
The proposed use will not likely affect the market value of real estate in the
vicinity as the property has been zoned for commercial uses for many
years.
(d) If a part of a proposed conditional use is found to be contrary to the standards
Planning Commission Staff Report Item 1
May 14, 2025 Page 4
described in this section, the applicant may propose or consent to curative
measures which will make the proposed use not contrary to the standards
described in this section.
The proposed use is not contrary to the standards described herein.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the foregoing Findings of Facts and Staff Analysis, staff recommend approval of the
requested Conditional Use Permit for Beehive Bazar LLC with the following conditions:
• That the occupancy is capped at 152 persons.
• That the applicant obtains the correct business license prior to operating.
• That the applicant keeps a valid lease agreement for the extra 22 parking spaces as
long as the business is operating.
• Hours of operation are clearly defined.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Site Map
2. Parking and Landscaping design
3. Applicant’s statement
4. Property photos
Planning Commission Staff Report Item 1
May 14, 2025 Page 5
ATTACHMENT 1 – SITE MAP
Planning Commission Staff Report Item 1
May 14, 2025 Page 6
ATTACHMENT 2 – PARKING AND LANDSCAPING DESIGN
Planning Commission Staff Report Item 1
May 14, 2025 Page 7
ATTACHMENT 3 – APPLICANTS STATEMENT
The Beehive Bazaar purchased this building to serve as a permanent location for our three
times per year handmade craft market - held in the spring, fall, and winter, which showcases
and supports local small businesses owners and entrepreneurs. Outside of those retail market
events, we plan to use the building as an event space for the community to rent for wedding
receptions, corporate events, family gatherings, etc.
Planning Commission Staff Report Item 1
May 14, 2025 Page 8
ATTACHMENT 4 – PROPERTY PHOTOS
Planning Commission Hearing
Staff Report
Hearing Date: May 14, 2025
*ITEM 2 Wendy Holdaway requests Ordinance Text Amendments to Provo City Code 14.30 to
allow for homes on the Landmarks Registry to be exempt from providing covered parking
structures for Accessory Dwelling Units. Citywide Application. Dustin Wright (801) 852-
6414 dwright@provo.gov PLOTA20250179
Applicant: Wendy Holdaway Relevant History:
Staff Coordinator: Dustin Wright The applicant has a historic landmarked
property that will have an accessory
Property Owner: N/A dwelling unit (ADU) and is trying to avoid
altering the property with a new structure,
Parcel ID: N/A
which is a goal of landmarks preservation.
Acreage: N/A
Neighborhood Issues:
Number of Properties: N/A Citywide Application. No issues provided to
Council Action Required: Yes staff.
Summary of Key Issues:
• This amendment would only apply to
properties on the Landmarks Register
and are in an area that would allow an
ADU.
• Adding new structures on historic
properties may compromise their historic
integrity.
• Required parking will still be needed for
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS an ADU to be established, it just would
not have to be covered parking.
Continue to a future date to obtain • The Landmarks Commission Chair
more information or to further provided a letter of support for this text
consider the information amendment to help preserve landmarked
presented. The next available properties in their original character while
meeting date is May 28, 2025, at still allowing for new opportunities.
6:00 p.m.
Staff Recommendation:
Recommend denial of the Recommend approval to the Municipal
requested text amendment. This Council for the proposed ordinance text
action would not be consistent with amendment to Provo City Code 14.30, to
the recommendations of the Staff allow for homes on the Landmarks Registry
Report. The Planning Commission to be exempt from providing covered
should state new findings. parking structures for Accessory Dwelling
Units.
Planning Commission Staff Report *Item 2
May 14, 2025 Page 2
BACKGROUND
The applicant owns a property that is on Provo’s Historic Landmark Register. The property is in
an area that allows accessory dwelling units (ADU), and she would like to establish one. One of
the requirements for parking spaces to be counted on a driveway is that the driveway leads to
the required covered parking (garage or carport). Like many historic properties, there is not an
existing carport or garage on the property that meets code. Rather than trying to add a new
carport to the historic property, staff suggested another approach would be to amend the City
Code.
CODE ANALYSIS
Sec. 14.020.020(2) establishes criteria for the amendments to the zoning title as follows: (Staff
response in bold type)
Before recommending an amendment to this Title, the Planning Commission shall determine
whether such amendment is in the interest of the public and is consistent with the goals and
policies of the Provo City General Plan. The following guidelines shall be used to determine
consistency with the General Plan:
(a) Public purpose for the amendment in question.
Staff response: The purpose of the amendment is to allow ADUs in historically
significant buildings with minimal impact to the historic integrity of the property. This
achieves two goals; increasing ADUs where they are allowed by zoning and to preserve
the historic integrity of Landmark properties. Additionally, the required off-street parking
would be provided.
(b) Confirmation that the public purpose is best served by the amendment in question.
Staff response: The amendment will allow property owners with historic properties to be
able to establish legal ADU’s where they are already allowed without needing to add new
structures on the property that may detract from the historic character. This will help
alleviate new development pressures to alter historic properties which will encourage
efforts to preserve these community assets.
(c) Compatibility of the proposed amendment with General Plan policies, goals, and objectives.
Staff response: This amendment aligns with, and helps carry out, goals in the General
Plan including:
Chapter 4.1c Continue to examine zoning solutions in certain locations to promote
Accessory Dwelling Units in residential areas.
Chapter 4.2c. Encourage "affordability through design" by using the best practices to
improve efficiency in building and land use.
(d) Consistency of the proposed amendment with the General Plan’s “timing and sequencing”
provisions on changes of use, insofar as they are articulated.
Planning Commission Staff Report *Item 2
May 14, 2025 Page 3
Staff response: The proposed amendment to the ordinance does not conflict with and
timing and sequencing of the General Plan.
(e) Potential of the proposed amendment to hinder or obstruct attainment of the General Plan’s
articulated policies.
Staff response: Staff does not see any potential conflicts from the proposed amendment
with the General Plan policies.
(f) Adverse impacts on adjacent landowners.
Staff response: No adverse impacts would be expected for adjacent landowners.
(g) Verification of correctness in the original zoning or General Plan for the area in question.
Staff response: N/A
(h) In cases where a conflict arises between the General Plan Map and General Plan Policies,
precedence shall be given to the Plan Policies.
Staff response: No conflicts exist between the map and plan in relation to the proposed
amendment.
STAFF ANALYSIS
Adding a new structure on a landmarked property is generally not desired as it may
unnecessarily impact or alter the original historic setting and character of the property or detract
from the original design and layout of the historic structure. We want to encourage the use and
upkeep of our historic structures and not require things that would detract from the original
character.
The proposed amendment (attachment 1) would add text in chapter 14.30 – Accessory Dwelling
Units – to provide an exclusion to the covered parking requirement for historic properties. They
would still need to provide the four (4) parking spaces as required in the code.
The proposed amendment would not allow ADUs where they are not already allowed. If a
landmark property is in an area that currently does not allow an ADU, then this amendment
would not change that. This would only be applicable for properties that are on the historic
register and are also found in a zone that would allow an ADU, and all the requirements would
have to be met.
This item does not go to the Landmarks Commission for a recommendation, but the Chair of the
Landmarks Commission has provided a personal letter of support (attachment 2) for this
proposed text amendment.
Currently, Provo has 47 homes that are on the Landmarks register and are in zones or areas
where ADUs are permitted by right.
Planning Commission Staff Report *Item 2
May 14, 2025 Page 4
CONCLUSION
The proposed text amendment is something that staff supports as it will help to preserve the
historic setting around historic homes and not detract from them with new additions. The parking
that is required by code will still be provided and it will not allow ADU’s in areas where they are
not already allowed. The public purpose will be to help ensure that we are encouraging
preservation and allowing for full use of the property while keeping adequate off-street parking.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval to the Municipal Council for the proposed ordinance text amendment to
Provo City Code 14.30, to allow for homes on the Landmarks Registry to be exempt from
providing covered parking structures for Accessory Dwelling Units.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Proposed Text
2. Letter of Support
Planning Commission Staff Report *Item 2
May 14, 2025 Page 5
ATTACHMENT 1 – PROPOSED TEXT
14.30.030 Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Development Standards.
ADUs shall be subject to the following development standards:
…
(5) Parking. A one (1) family dwelling with an ADU shall have at least four (4) off-street
parking spaces.
(a) Two (2) tandem parking spaces (front to rear) shall be permitted when the
front and back spaces are both designated to serve either the ADU or the
principal part of the dwelling unit.
(b) Parking spaces for a one (1) family dwelling with an associated ADU may be
located on a driveway in a required front yard, provided the driveway leads to the
minimum number of required covered off-street parking spaces.
(i) Properties listed on the Provo City Landmarks Register are exempt
from providing covered parking if the required number of parking spaces is
met in approved parking locations.
(ii) No off-street parking spaces in the front yard are allowed between the
primary dwelling and the street.
(c) In no case shall the number of off-street parking spaces be less than the
number of vehicles being maintained on the premises.
(d) Parking shall comply with all other regulations of PCC Chapter 14.37, Provo
City Code.
…
Planning Commission Staff Report *Item 2
May 14, 2025 Page 6
ATTACHMENT 2 – LETTER OF SUPPORT
This statement serves to confirm my support, as chair of the Provo Historic Landmarks
Commission, of the proposed amendment to Provo City Code 14.30. This change will
provide an exemption from the requirement of covered parking structures for accessory
dwelling units on properties listed in the Landmarks Registry.
I believe this amendment will be beneficial in preserving open space and reducing
visual clutter around our historic buildings. Additionally, the amendment offers a distinct
advantage and/or benefit to owners of landmark properties who would like to adapt their
properties to meet contemporary needs.
Sincerely,
David Amott
Get email alerts for Provo
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.