City Council

River Heights City River Heights City Council Agenda Tuesday, February 18, 2025 Notice is hereby given that the River Heights City Council will hold their regular meeting at 6:30 p.m., anchored from the River Heights City Office Building at 520 S 500 E. Attendance can be in person or through Zoom. Pledge of Allegiance Adoption of Previous Minutes and Agenda Discuss a PO for 105 Water Meters in the Amount of $20,300 Mayor, Councilmembers, and Staff Reports Approval of Payment for Old School Code Analysis from Design West Public Comment Presentation on Amendment to the 911 Dispatch Services Agreement Discuss and Decide on a Rezone Request from Kelly and Kay Taylor on Property 02-028-0046 (440 E 800 S) from Agricultural to R-1-8 Discuss and Decide on a Rezone Request from Heritage Land Development on Property 02-029-0028 (approx. 755 S 700 E) from Agricultural to R-1-8 Further Review of the Basement Rental Policy Posted this 13*^ day of February 2025 C Sheila Lind, Recorder Zoom Link: https://u506web.zoom.us/i/89454713492 In compliance with the American Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations (including auxiliary communicative aids and services) during this meeting should notify Sheila Lind, (435) 770-2061 at least 24 hours before the meeting. 520 South 500 East River Heights, Utah 84321 Phone & Fax (435) 752-2646  River Heights City 1 3 Council Meeting 4 February 18, 2025 5 6 7 Present: Mayor Blake Wright 8 Council members: Lana Hanover 9 Mark Malmstrom 10 Janet Mathews 11 Chris Mllbank, electronic 12 Lance Pitcher 13 14 Public Works Director Clayten Nelson 15 Recorder Sheila Lind 16 Treasurer Michelle Jensen 17 18 Others Present: See attached roll 19 20 21 The following motions were made during the meeting: 22 Motion #1 Councilmember Pitcher moved to "adopt the minutes of the council meeting of February 4, 2025, 25 and the evening's agenda." Councilmember Malmstrom seconded the motion, which passed with 26 Hanover, Malmstrom, Mathews, Milbank, and Pitcher in favor. No one opposed. 27 28 Motion #2 29 Councilmember Mathews moved to "approve the PO for 105 water meters in the amount of 30 $20,300." Councilmember Hanover seconded the motion, which carried with Hanover, Malmstrom, 31 Mathews, Milbank, and Pitcher in favor. No one opposed. 32 33 Motion #3 34 Councilmember Milbank moved to "approve $862.50 to be paid to Design West for an old school 35 code analysis." Councilmember Malmstrom seconded the motion which passed with Malmstrom, Milbank 36 and Pitcher in favor. Hanover and Mathews opposed. 37 38 Motion #4 39 Councilmember Hanover moved to "adopt Amendment No. 1 to the Interlocal Agreement for 40 Dispatch Services Between Logan City and River Heights City, contingent upon approval from the city 41 attorney." Councilmember Pitcher seconded the motion, which passed with Hanover, Malmstrom, 42 Mathews, Milbank, and Pitcher in favor. No one opposed. 43 44 mULl IlLlgllLJ tiLy LUUULII mLLLillfe,, jl/iu/ng ¥ 520 South 500 East River Heights, Utah 84321 Phone & Fax (435) 752-2646 46 Motion #5 47 Councilmember Milbank moved to "adopt Ordinance 2-2025, An Ordinance to Rezone Parcel 02- 48 029-0028, Owned by Heritage Land Development at Approximately 755 S 700 E from Agricultural to R-1- 49 8." Councilmember Pitcher seconded the motion, which passed with Hanover, Malmstrom, Milbank, and 50 Pitcher in favor. Mathews opposed. 51 52 53 Proceedings of the Meeting: 54 55 The River Heights City Council met at 6:30 p.m. in the Ervin R. Crosbie Council Chambers in the 56 River Heights City Building on Tuesday, February 18, 2025, for their regular council meeting. 57 Pledge of Allegiance 58 Adoption of Previous Minutes and Agenda: Minutes for the February 4, 2025 meeting were 59 reviewed. 60 Councilmember Pitcher moved to "adopt the minutes of the council meeting of February 4, 61 2025, and the evening's agenda." Councilmember Malmstrom seconded the motion, which passed with 62 Hanover, Malmstrom, Mathews, Milbank, and Pitcher in favor. No one opposed. 63 Discuss a PO for 105 Water Meters in the Amount of $20,300: PWD Nelson explained there are 64 several water meters that are no longer able to be read electronically. The meters were installed 15 years 65 ago and It was time to replace them. The requested meters were budgeted for. 66 Councilmember Mathews moved to "approve the PO for 105 water meters in the amount of 67 $20,300." Councilmember Hanover seconded the motion, which carried with Hanover, Malmstrom, 68 Mathews, Milbank, and Pitcher in favor. No one opposed. 69 Reports from Mayor, Councilmembers. and Staff: 70 Councilmember Hanover 71 • She asked if there was anyone in the chambers who would like to be involved in the emergency 72 management committee, to let her know. 73 Mayor Wright 74 • He updated on the city's litigation with the Boys and Girls Club. The Club requested one last 75 mediation which was scheduled for next week. He and the city attorney planned to attend and 76 operate on the council's previous recommendation. The final decision would be brought to the 77 Council for their approval. 78 Treasurer Jensen 79 • The online invoice approval process was going along well. They had encountered a few technical 80 problems which she would have Caselle fix. 81 Public Works Director Nelson 82 • Mayor Wright thanked Mr. Nelson and Jake Weston for plowing the city's streets. 83 Councilmember Milbank 84 • He had received two estimates for the pavilion at the new park and was waiting on a third. Once 85 he had three, he would seek guidance from the council. 86 • He was working on a RAP2 grant application and another one recommended by the mayor. Both 87 grants request matching funds from the city. He asked the council if they could foresee any funds 88 available for a restroom at the new park in the next year. Councilmember Mathews asked how 89 much was left to do at the Heber Olson Park Pavilion and wondered if the RAPZ money could be 90 applied to projects other than a new restroom. PWD Nelson said there would be significant River Heights City Council Meeting, 2/18/25 2 Q1 landscaping to be done at the current pavilion. Mayor Wright noted there were upcoming expenditures that couldn't be avoided. He suggested that he, Treasurer Jensen, and 93 Councllmember Mllbank could meet to discuss the upcoming budgets. Mr. Milbank said he would 94 continue to write the grants and plan on meeting with them to get figures. 95 • Councllmember Mathews asked if It were possible to apply for RAPZ funding to finish the 96 landscaping and cement work at the current pavilion before adding more to the new park. 97 ' Councllmember Mllbank informed that the city had RAPZ population grants for two years (roughly 98 $10,000) to finish the cement work. 99 Approval of Payment for Old School Code Analysis from Design West: Mayor Wright recapped his 100 explanation from the last meeting where he declared a conflict of interest with an upcoming invoice from 101 Design West since he was a major shareholder and president of the company. He explained that he had 102 someone from Design West agree to donate an hour to come look at the old school restrooms to see if 103 they met a daycare use. The anticipated hour turned into seven since the issue led him to spend 104 additional time in state code and document his findings for the city. He asked the council to approve a bill 105 for $862.50. He noted that the code analysis could be helpful to the city in the future. He also informed 106 that he, himself, had donated a lot of his own expertise for the city, which he hadn't billed for. 107 Counciimember Milbank moved to "approve $862.50 to be paid to Design West for an old 108 school code analysis." Counciimember Malmstrom seconded the motion which passed with 109 Malmstrom, Mllbank and Pitcher in favor. Hanover and Mathews opposed. no Public Comment: Jamie Saltern discussed the Heritage rezone request. She felt like it was all about 111 affordable housing. She said she had done a lot of research on the subject and informed there wasn't 112 anything to be found for less than $300,000. She looked at Heritage's developments in Nibley and explained their lowest price for living space was over $400,000. Other Heritage developments homes cost more. She said people in River Heights wanted to live where there wasn't low-income housing. She didn't 115 want more traffic going past her house. She hoped they would consider R-12, rather than R-8 for the 116 property east of the church. 117 Presentation on Amendment to the 911 Dispatch Services Agreement: Chief Jeff Simmons 118 introduced Kristi Walker and Bryan Low, from the dispatch office: Chief Simmons explained that Logan 119 City Police oversaw the dispatch center, which dispatched for Logan City Fire, Police, and the County 120 Sheriff Departments. The dispatchers were underpaid, and understaffed. Costs had also gone up. At their 121 current fee of $3/household/month they were barely breaking even, and they wanted to be able to 122 expand. They proposed a 10% increase in 2025, which would be an additional 30 cents/household/month. 123 They also proposed a 3% increase each year for the next four years (2026-2030). 124 Bryan Low explained that in 1997 they started charging $l/resident/month and raised it to two 125 dollars and then to three over the years. He said 3% was a standard raise on operating expenses. He 126 discussed the P97 upgrade which would allow them to interact with other centers. 127 Mayor Wright felt their request was reasonable and recommended that the council give their 128 approval upon condition of getting a recommendation from the city attorney. 129 Counciimember Hanover moved to "adopt Amendment No. 1 to the Interlocal Agreement for 130 Dispatch Services Between Logan City and River Heights City, contingent upon approval from the city 131 attorney." Counciimember Pitcher seconded the motion, which passed with Hanover, Malmstrom, 132 Mathews, Milbank, and Pitcher in favor. No one opposed. 133 Discuss and Decide on a Rezone Request from Kelly and Kav Taylor on Property 02-028-0046 (440 134 E 800 S) from Agricultural to R-1-8: Dru Taylor explained that his parents purchased the property and desired to rezone it from agricultural to R-1-8. They initially wanted to rezone to R-1-12, but the Planning Commission suggested R-1-8. They planned on three lots at % acre and larger, so the zone didn't matter River Heights City Council Meeting, 2/18/25 3 137 to them. They had engaged Civil Solutions Engineers to determine the groundwater situation. During their 138 initial plan presentation to the Commission, they recommended a rezone to match the surrounding zones. 139 Councilmember Hanover didn't understand why the Taylors wouldn't still ask for R-1-12 since 140 their lot sizes would fit in that zone. 141 Councilmember Malmstrom said if the Council allowed R-1-8, the property owners could change 142 their minds to smaller lots. 143 In discussion about the water table on their property, Dru Taylor assured they had plans to 144 mitigate the high water and were in the process of figuring out what they were working with. 145 At the request of Mayor Wright, Commissioner Cooley gave a summary of the public hearing held 146 one week ago. Mr. Cooley explained there were four concerns which came up: Water issues, If the size of 147 the new homes would affect property values, how animals (horses) on the surrounding properties would 148 be affected by mitigation of the ground water, and the possible need of a fire hydrant. He noted that all 149 the adjoining properties were zoned R-1-8. If they went with an R-1-12 zone it would be considered spot 150 zoning, which the state didn't recommend. He also reported that the city's sensitive zone map showed 151 about 1/3 of the property with a water situation, which would all be dealt with when the Taylor's applied 152 for their minor subdivision. Only three homes would be allowed on the property regardless of what the 153 zone was. If they tried to go with more homes on smaller lots they would be into a different set of rules 154 that wouldn't work on their particular property. The irrigation system on the property was also discussed. 155 It was the Commission's recommendation to the council that the property be rezoned to R-1-8. 156 Councilmember Hanover asked for an explanation of spot zoning. Commissioner Cooley said the 157 state didn't like parcels to be zoned differently than surrounding areas. 158 Malmstrom noted the properties to the east are agricultural. If this one is at R-1-8 it sets a 159 precedent on the other properties to be consistent with R-1-8. 160 Commissioner Cooley noted that if the Taylor's decided to do 8,000 sq ft lots, they would need to 161 install all the infrastructure to the subdivision requirements. The stipulations would not work on this size 162 and shape of property. 163 Engineer Rasmussen elaborated on spot zoning. The state saw It as being arbitrary and capricious. 164 However, the applicant could ask for whatever zone they wanted. The city shouldn't tell them what to ask 165 for or change it on their application. Property owners have a right to ask for what the surrounding area is 166 allowed. To approve R-1-12 would be spot zoning. The property wasn't in a transition zone, which could 167 be a reason to approve a different zone. 168 Councilmember Mathews asked if the same rule would apply to the agricultural properties to the 169 east. Engineer Rasmussen said agricultural zones are used as the undeveloped default. She expressed 170 concern about the high-water table and the animals. 171 Engineer Rasmussen discussed minor subdivisions versus regular subdivisions and pointed out 172 that the Taylor property wouldn't have what it took for a regular subdivision, and noted that the animals 173 didn't seem to suffer from previous development. 174 Councilmember Mathews' preference was R-1-12. 175 Councilmember Malmstrom asked questions concerning the possibility of a PUD. Mr. Rasmussen 176 said a PUD required a much larger piece of property. 177 Councilmember Hanover didn't agree with R-1-8, but would be willing to entertain R-1-10. 178 Commissioner Cooley said they had applied for R-1-8. He also said minor subdivision lots are to be 179 consistent with the surrounding areas. 180 Discussion was had on other purported spot zone areas in the city. Engineer Rasmussen explained 181 that some of them came about because the General Plan was different at that time. He recommended R- 182 1-8 for Taylor's rezone. River Heights City Council Meeting, 2/18/25 4 1 Q'2 Commissioner Malmstrom was concerned about the undeveloped properties next to it. He felt R- 1-12 was going to set a precedent for the others. Mathews agreed. 185 Councilmember Pitcher moved to "adopt Ordinance 3-2025, An Ordinance to Rezone parcel 02- // 186 028-0046, Owned by Kelly and Kay Taylor at Approximately 440 E 800 S from Agricultural to R-1-8. 187 Councilmember Milbank seconded the motion, which died with Milbank and Pitcher in favor. Hanover, 188 Malmstrom, and Mathews opposed. 189 Tyson Glover asked if there would be a process for getting input from the city attorney. He 190 petitioned the council to approve the R-1-8 zone contingent on the city attorney's opinion. He didn't hear 191 any arguments from the council that the attorney would agree to. 192 Councilmember Milbank felt the council was being subjective and respected Mr. Glover's 193 comments. He was surprised they were forcing landowners into a larger lot zone. 194 Mayor Wright said he would talk with the city attorney to get his opinion. 195 Discuss and Decide on a Rezone Request from Heritage Land Development on Property 02-029- 196 0028 fapprox. 755 S 700 E) from Agricultural to R-1-8: Loyal Cook explained that Heritage owned three 197 parcels. Two of them were already zoned R-1-8. The Master Plan showed this property as RPUD. If the 198 Council had granted their request for the RPUD zone they would have received funding for affordable 199 housing which would have allowed them to sell their dwellings for $450,000. He gave a history of 200 Heritage's efforts In developing their property. They purchased the property in 2020. It took quite a while 201 to get the break gate easement from the Church. Then they applied for a rezone to RPUD while they were 202 working on their concept plan. When it came time for a vote by the council it all got put on hold because 203 the city attorney felt they should get a development agreement in place prior to going any further, which 204 took a year. They moved forward again with their RPUD rezone request again and was turned down by the Council after the citizens said they didn't want it but would be okay with R-1-8, which is what they had' applied for now. They provided a traffic study, which showed their development would not be a big 207 impact on River Heights roads - only a 10% increase. 208 Councilmember Malmstrom asked about the range of lot sizes noted in the traffic study. Mr. Cook 209 said there were 41 proposed lots. Sixteen lots were in the 8,000 sq ft range. Everything else was larger 210 with the average lot size being 13,211 sq ft. 211 Commissioner Cooley gave a review of the public hearing with the Planning Commission the week 212 prior. Citizens were concerned about increased traffic, no open space, lot size, and they wanted to see 213 two accesses. The Commission had discussed that the surrounding parcels were R-1-8 and that RPUD was 214 turned down. There was an emergency exit through the church property. The traffic Issue would be dealt 215 with at development time. The Commission approved the R-1-8 rezone request, in a 4-1 vote. He noted 216 that the number of lots and sizes could all change. 217 Councilmember Hanover asked what were the most amount of lots they could get with an R-1-8 218 zone. Mr. Cook said the most was 41. 219 Councilmember Hanover had an issue with only one way In and one way out. Commissioner 220 Cooley noted that Windsor Drive and Logan City's CliffsIde area only had one access. 221 Councilmember Mathews noted that there were larger lots in the Heritage area. Commissioner 222 Cooley said Heritage's property was surrounded by R-1-8. 223 Mr. Cook reiterated they asked for R-1-8 because of input from the citizens at the last rezone 224 request. 225 Councilmember Hanover reviewed some of the traffic study. She didn't agree that 70% of the 226 traffic would go through Providence. Engineer Rasmussen commented that there were points he agreed with on the study and some he did not. He knew it was done by a very good engineer, but it was done quickly. He also didn't agree that River Heights City Council Meeting, 2/18/25 5 229 70% of traffic would go south. The amount of Increase from River Heights was very limited, based on the 230 amount of open space left in the city. The study used statewide data that showed 4,500 vehicles/day on 231 600 East. The number generated from this Heritage's development was 3% of this, which he felt was a 232 high estimate. He noted that the city commissioned traffic counts In 2022, which showed there were 233 2,000 dally trips. He pointed out that 600 East was a regional trip collector. Heritage's subdivision would 234 add a negligible amount on this road. He felt the subdivision was a good set up with only one access onto 235 600 East rather than 40 homes backing onto it. He said he had discussed the subdivision with the fire 236 marshal and once he understood the situation with the emergency access he was fine with it. Mayor 237 Wright pointed out that the emergency access wasn't only for emergency vehicles. 238 Councilmember Malmstrom asked if the break gate access would go through a yard. Mr. Cook said 239 it would be a paved access. Councilmember Pitcher asked if It could be moved north or south. Engineer 240 Rasmussen said it had to be at the specific spot it was granted. 241 Councilmember Mathews asked if there was anyone local who could do a more precise traffic 242 study. Mr. Cook said they would get this done with their subdivision process. Ms. Mathews wished it had 243 been done by now. Engineer Rasmussen reminded it wasn't required at the rezone process, per the city ,244 and the state. It would all be discussed and figured out at the subdivision process. He noted that the 245 county would have a say with how to mitigate the traffic the subdivision would produce. Ms. Mathews 246 asked if they might need to widen 600 East. Engineer Rasmussen said if the county deemed it in the 247 future, it would be a development cost. 248 Councilmember Hanover felt the traffic study could weigh on the rezone decision. She appreciated 249 having the information before making her decision. 250 Mr. Cook didn't agree their subdivision would adversely affect traffic in the area. 251 Councilmember Hanover asked Treasurer Jensen if she would discuss the cost benefits in the 252 traffic study with the Council. Ms. Jensen said she wasn't comfortable discussing it in conjunction with the 253 rezone process. 254 Engineer Rasmussen explained that he didn't have a vested interest in the rezone. His opinion was 255 based on city ordinances. His comments were not intended to sway, but to enlighten them on what the 256 city codes stated. 257 Commissioner Cooley reminded that the General Plan was adopted in 2021, which went through 258 two public hearings. At that time Heritage's property was designated as RPUD, which would allow up to 259 70 dwellings. The public was Invited to participate in the hearings. Heritage was now requesting a less 260 dense zone. He felt R-1-8 was an appropriate alternative. 261 Councilmember Malmstrom asked if it were possible to stipulate with the rezone, that the 262 development wouldn't go higher than 41 lots. He was informed it couldn't be done that way. 263 Councilmember Pitcher asked how many times the Council could deny a request. He was 264 answered that it could be denied until it ended up in court. 265 Councilmember Mathews said in 2020 when they were discussing the RPUD, there were a lot of 266 citizens against it. Mayor Wright stated that the majority of people who showed up to the meeting were 267 against it. 268 Councilmember Milbank said the R-1-8 zone conforms to the city's ordinance and General Plan 269 and felt citizens and the Council should be objective in their decisions. 270 Councilmember Milbank moved to "adopt Ordinance 2-2025, An Ordinance to Rezone Parcel 02- 271 029-0028, Owned by Heritage Land Development at Approximately 755 S 700 E from Agricultural to R-1- 272 8." Councilmember Pitcher seconded the motion, which passed with Hanover, Malmstrom, Milbank, 273 and Pitcher in favor. Mathews opposed. River Heights City Council Meeting, 2/18/25 6 07^1 Further Review of the Basement Rental Policy: Councllmember Milbank said the new draft was essentially the same as the last meeting except the fees. He included language about non-profit groups 276 and felt the increase in fees seemed reasonable. Non-profit group fees would be decided by the council 277 case by case. Councllmember Hanover brought up the previous discussion about most of the attendees 278 needing to be River Heights residents. PWD Nelson suggested changing "must" to "should. 279 PWD Nelson reported on the bid he received for the electronic locks, which would cover the 280 basement door and allow for future additions to the city building doors. The bid came to $2,900 and he 281 planned to bring it to the next meeting as a PO for the Council to consider. 282 Engineer Rasmussen stated that Hyrum City had much higher deposits. They were also in the 283 process of switching to a key card lock system. 284 The council members were generally fine with the wording and pointed out that they could 285 change it later if something wasn't working out. Councllmember Milbank would work with Recorder Lind 286 to get the verbiage to reflect their discussion. 287 The meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. 288 289 290 291 292 293 Sheila Lind, Recorder 294 295 296 297 Blake Wright, Mayor River Heights City Council Meeting, 2/18/25 7  Please print your name on the rol. C&o^ gl-6<5tromc- f>^e’he ScLK-cLxxi) Tl^S(9in /\J SK-^UA-e^ 5 (j]r\ e«^ A‘i\rO/C -t A^i'ucxC p£/V C? I/A r<^ 0x3/1 ON/ PvKa \Ja.Y\ lMh\a\-0 M\\oe^ ^V\l^C{X\ t-ev\) Slvr>i^<)'nS  PURCH/ RDER River Heights City Corporation Office Use' Purchase Order No: 520 South 500 East Office Use r Purchase Order Date: River Heights, Utah 84321 (4351752-2646 ship To: Payten Nelson 520 South 500 East River Heights, Utah 84321 ■ 435-213-6948 Vendor: Mueller Systems 5t3tecontracts.utgov Above state website has been checked: Yes No Is ah offical P.O. Required by Vendor. Yes No (800) 423-1323 Vendor Contact, Phone, Email: Please attach any supporting quotes or data to this requisition. 8004231323 Requesting Council Member: GLti Description . Unit Price Total Item Quantity SQ320EN 60 SSM3/4"S,SG,.lV,8E,XPRO 18"N $ 145.00 $ 8,700.00 E0520EN 40 SSM,rS6,18"NIC s 200.00 $ 8,000.00 S0720EN 5 SSM2",Se,.lV,8E,XPRO 18"NIC $ 720.00 $ 3,600;00 **Vendor Please Include P.O. # on all invoices** Subtotel $ 20,300.00 Shipping/Other River Heights Oty Corporation Tax I.D. No. 87-028929-7 • TOTAL s 20,300.00 Date Mayor Slgnature/Coundl Mtg. Approval Treasurer processed Signature Date  SALES QUOTATION Phone: (800)423-1323 Created Date: 07/08/2024 Website: www.MuellerSystems.com Quote#: Q-156344 Quote Expires: 04/01/2025 Attention: Clayten Nelson Phone: (435)752-2646 Terms are located at: Email: cnelson@riverhe!ghts.org www.muellerwaterproducts.coni/terms-conditions Company Address: Currency Type: USD 520 SOUTH MAIN 500 E Prepared by; ' RIVER HEIGHTS,UT,84321 Arek Ryzak Prepared Fon River Heights (UT), City of Account#: 95089900 End User: River Heights (UT), City of 'Comments ^TConsIcleration $50 minimum order, $75 non-box quantity Purchase of any LoRaWAN Network-aSfa-Service part number, such as “MSW-LW-PH-ALL", is subject to SaaS and NaaS Agreement. Shouid you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Arek-Ryzak Ctubte Ciheltems PART# DESCRIPTION UNITS SALE PRICE EXTENDED NET S0320EN SSM3/4"S,SG,.1V.8E.XPRO 18"N 60 145.00 8,700.00 E0520EN SSM.r',SG.18”NIC 40 200.00 8,000.00 S0720EN SSM 2".SG..1V.8E,XPR0 18"N!C 5 720.00 3,600.00 SUBTOTAL: USD 20,300.00000 TOTAL: USD 20,300.00 Page 1 of 1  design west architects 79S North 400 West 255 South SOOWost SallUko City, UT 84103 Logan, UT 84321 Tel 801.539.8221 Fax 601.539.8224 Tel 431752.7031 Fax 435.752.5325 River Heights City Invoice number 2025-9669 520 South 500 East Date 02/18/2025 River Heights, UT 84321 Project 824306 River Heights City Pavilion For Professional Services Through : 02/07/2025 Time & Expense Fees Basic Services Task 1.0 Pavilion Concrete Pad Design: T&M NTE $1,500 Billed Hours Rate Amount Landscape Architect I 3.50 100.00 350.00 Landscape Architect II 8.00 130.00 1,040.00 Phase subtotal 1,390.00 Basic Services subtotal 1,390.00 Invoice total 1,390.00 Aging Summary Invoice Number Invoice Date Outstanding Current Over 30 Over 60 Over 90 Over 120 2025-9669 02/18/2025 1,390.00 1,390.00 Total 1,390.00 1,390.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Invoice due 30 days from date of invoice. Please remit payment to our Salt Lake office: 795 North 400 lA'esf Salt Lake City, UT 84103 River Heights City Invoice number 2025-9669 Invoice date 02/18/2025 Page 1  AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR DISPATCH SERVICES BETWEEN LOGAN CITY AND RIVER HEIGHTS CITY This AMENDMENT NO. 1 (“Amendment”) is made this day of 2025, to the INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR DISPATCH SERVICES (“Agreement”) between Logan City (“LOGAN”) and River Heights City (“USER”) executed on July 21, 2017. BACKGROUND The Parties entered into the Agreement to govern the dispatch services LOGAN provides USER. Pursuant to the Agreement, LOGAN has assessed USER a Three Dollar ($3.00) per month per household or-commercial site rate (“Assessment”) for those households/sites located within user’s boundaries. LOGAN has not increased the Assessment amount since 2002. Due to the increased demand for dispatch services caused by population growth and the increased cost of the dispatch services, the Parties recognize that it is necessary to make a slight increase to the Assessment. The purpose of this Amendment is to express the Parties’ consent (expressly conditioned upon approval by the Parties’ relative legislative bodies) to increase the Assessment charged to USER for the dispatch services provided by LOGAN. AMENDMENT Accordingly, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 1. Section 3(A) in the Agreement entitled “ASSESSMENTS FOR OPERATING COSTS” is hereby revoked and replaced with the following: A. The USER shall be assessed for services received and the assessment shall be currently equivalent to Three Dollars and Thirty Cents ($3.30) per month, per household or commercial site located with the USER’S boundaries. This assessment may be amended by LOGAN upon due notice to and with USER’S approval. USER shall have an opportunity to appear before LOGAN at a regularly scheduled LOGAN municipal council meeting with respect to the amount of the assessment. 1 of 2  1. The above assessment is equal to a ten percent (10%) increase on the current three-dollar ($3.00) rate. The ten percent (10%) increase is for fiscal year 2026 (July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026) only. The Parties agree that there will be a three percent (3%) increase each year thereafter, beginning in fiscal year 2027 (July 1, 2026 - June 30, 2027) and continuing through, and including, fiscal year 2030 (July 1, 2029 - June 30, 2030). 2. Add Section 3 (E) titled “NON-APPROPRIATION.” Section 3 (E) shall read: A. This Agreement recognizes that the parties are governmental entities which rely upon the appropriation of funds by their respective governing bodies to satisfy obligations. As such, if the City of River Heights determines that it does not have funds to meet its obligations under this Agreement, it shall have the right to terminate the Contract without penalty on the last day of the fiscal period for which funds were legally available. 3. Integrated Agreement: Apart fi'om the Amendments described above, the Agreement remains unchanged and in full effect and shall be interpreted as a part thereof as a single integrated agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is signed by the Parties on' the date indicated below. LOGAN CITY RIVER HEIGHTS CITY Mayor Holly Daines Mayor Blake Wright Date: Date: ATTEST: ATTEST: Teresa Harris Sheila Lind Logan City Recorder River Heights City Recorder 2 of 2 ( I Cache Valley Dispatch Center - 20 positions (currently only have 17 dispatchers and 4 of those are trainees). High level of training/certifications/expertise required. Dispatch all Responder (police/fire) calls in Cache Valley, USU, and UHP. I *No rate increase in 23years Summary 911 Fees and Expenses .■» Adopted Budget 2025 (exceptforthe $1 fee adopted in I^Descriptjpn 2013 for radio upgrade). E911Fees (Phone Revenue) 815,000.00 other Intergovernmental Revenue (Spillman Reimbursement) 35,000.00 *Average Inflationary Rate of 748,000.00 14% for past two years. Communication Center Fees: (Paid by Logan Ci^) Communication CenterFees (Contract Cities) 990,000.00 * People/Technology/Equipment PTIF 0334 Interest (Reserve account interest) 15,000.00 increasingly expensive. Miscellaneous Revenue (UHP/USU Contracts) 301,409.00 *lncreased wages/benefits 2,904,409.00 (29%) Total Revenue -Box Elder starts at $27.50/hr 2,032,405.00 -Rich Co. starting wage $26/hr Salaries and Wages Operations (software, training phone tines, Admin, IT, Risk) 440,882.00 -Our starting wage: $22.85/hr Radios 305,122.00 *More customers, more calls but Equipment 126,000.00 no increase in personnel: Total Expenditures 2,904,409.00 2011 - 39,000+ calls dispatched 2024 -58,000+ calls dispatched To mitigate increasing expenses, we have: o Reduced staff from 21 to 20 for immediate & needed wage increases. o Increased contract fees with USUPD and UHP. o Always seeking for and apply for yearly grants. We are proposing the following increase to 911 residential fees: 2025 10% increase on the current $3 dollar rate for 2025 ($.30 increase per month/per residence $3.60 year - $118k budgetary increase) 2026 3% increase for 2026 ($.09.9 cent increase/$3.39 per month - $37k budgetary increase) 2027 3% increase for 2027 ($10.1 cent increase/$3.50 per month) 2028 3% increase for 2028 ($10.5 cent increase/$3.60 per month) 2029 3% increase for 2029 ($10.8 cent increase/$3.71 per month)  RIVER HEIGHTS CITY 520 South 500 East * 435-752-2646 Application for Project Review Type of Application Subdivision Minor Subdivision Flag Lot X Rezone Boundary Adjustment Convnercial Development Commercial Parking Applicant Phone Number email address Kelly & Kay Taylor Mailing Address, City, State, Zip Property Owfier of Record Phone Number K & K Taylor Revocable Trust (settlement date Feb 11) Mailing Address, City, State, Zip same Project Name Rezone Parcel 02-28-0046 Property Address County Parcel ID Number 440 East 800 South 02-28-0046 Size of Lot Size of Building Number of Dwellings/Units/Lots 2.32 Acres NA NA Describe the proposed project • Rezone parcel from AG to R-1-8 in preparation for a future minor subdivision application. • The parcel is under contract with a Feb 11 settlement date between the Bird Family Trust and the K & K Taylor Revocable Trust. We certify we are the developer and record owner of this property and we consent to the submittal of application. Kelly & Kay Taylor Jan 28, 2025 Developer Date Property Owner Date  Cache County Parcel Viewer (1 of 2) Applicant property is outlined in red. Downloaded: 10:21 pm, January 27, 2025 https://Ris.cachecountv.eov/Websites/Parcel%20and%20Zoning%20Vie wer f Lii ptWILLlAM R SEAMONS UACtNfii BREEANAB, Enhanced Sear • / o. « ! 'a> , o6 .r « UJ 3-z Ul Ik. <f S O CD o ^ o K 02'028-0069^® 'K lA Qi >- ■27-0055. : gpz f ^’ZACHARY ‘ T -*z>- o - <MA K'&^' s^- ’ a .r : cv ^4 EVERTSEN ^Vs'j WOOD *‘3o o Ul K f CO'Df X- 9 i» w ct t- o S'O' ga^ ^8 O - UJ S *u =) CO — rvj K 5, I < S >‘ U; 5 O- iC UJ P 9 5o <' <N I * d •a.o. Q >•’ ■ .Jf ,-^'5 ®~ n. -< UJ 02-028:GAP'’ d:5 u o a o P,o i02-028;0046 ( rv: •r.'2 Hi cc UJ o ^■> BIRO’FAMILY 02-028-0049' :.z K' 1, KARLM & (/3 (T TRUST z f- •'»r LISAA shupe o;w 'f l''\ •• .* ■ to D A-' kO'-J P - - 'fl.m *§[Suj' ^ UJ — . . ^<N _ (D 02*5)27-0059 _,UJ-_l ■,9 P < , *■ KRISTIE M;SPENCER t jj. r*j UJ y o^P O I* ak^REVOCABLEiTRUSTiJ > UJ a I: J, V 182^0076j L [ A' f'Jfll'f X I (  ORDINANCE 3-2025 AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE PARCEL 02-028-0046, OWNED BY KELLY AND KAY TAYLOR AT APPROXIMATELY 440 E 800 S FROM AGRICULTURAL TO R-1-8 WHEREAS, Kelly and Kay Taylor own parcel 02-028-0046, which totals 2.32 acres, and WHEREAS, this property is currently zoned Agricultural, and WHEREAS, Kelly and Kay Taylor has requested the property be rezoned to R-1-8, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on February 11, 2025, to address the request, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council that the above stated parcel be considered for the R-1-8 Zone. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVER HEIGHTS, that the above property be zoned R-l-8. ADOPTED BY THE RIVER HEIGHTS MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THIS 18'*^ DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025. Blake Wright, Mayor Attest: Sheila Lind, Recorder  RIVER HEIGHTS CITY 520 South 500 East * 435-752-2646 Application for Project Review Type of Application Subdivision Minor Subdivision Flag lot ^ Rezone- Boundary Adjustment Commercial Development . Commercial Parking Heritage Land Development Applicant Phone Number email address 470 N 2450 W Tremonton. UT. 84337 Mailing Address, CItVi State, Zip- Jay Stocking (Heritage Land Holdings & Heritage Property Solutions) Property Owner of Record Phone Number 470 N. 2450 W. Tremonton, UT. 84337 Mailing Address. City, State, Zip Creekside Estates Project Name approx 755 S 700 E, River Heights UT 02-029-0028 Property Address County Parcel ID Number 11.31 acres • 30 lots Size of Lot Size of Building Number of Dwellings/Units/Lots Would like to develop property for single family lots. S Describe the proposed project We cer^-we-ar€-the developer and record owner of this property and we consent to the submittal of application. f Developer Date Propert^v/ri^ ate  \ 1 H n- t !:' LU j >v t :r r I ■l L* .’ ; t k •V -rtiL^V I V • f .' ?e N. CM , o 2 (/) ■o o ^ ‘•V, -.a,- 1 a) CM p O ■i UJ • f „ . ,f 9lO • I#. ^ > ■- J . . u o CD _JH o o X o < v00.>- 1 -. ^. l/> 4*r V • ?•* • o Q O .^1 ■jjI ^s'*' <1(0 U.J3 4 1 ■ .P S'- • X'* • r)»'  ORDINANCE 2-2025 AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE PARCEL 02-029-0028, OWNED BY HERITAGE LAND DEVELOPMENT AT APPROXIMATELY 755 S 700 E FROM AGRICULTURAL TO R-1-8 WHEREAS, Heritage Land Development owns parcel 02-029-0028, which totals 11.31 acres, and WHEREAS, this property is currently zoned Agricultural, and WHEREAS, Heritage Land Development has requested the property be rezoned to R-1-8, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on February 11,2025, to address the request, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council that the above stated parcel be considered for the R-1 -8 Zone. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVER HEIGHTS, that the above property be zoned R-1-8. ) ADOPTED BY THE RIVER HEIGHTS MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THIS 18“^ DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025. Blake Wright, Mayor Attest: Sheila Lind, Recorder  River Heights City 520 South 500 East 435-752-2646 Building Use Policy Group Representative*: Phone # Address: Email: Reservation Date:** Hours: ♦ ♦♦ # of People: (40 max) *Must be at least 21 years old, a resident of River Heights and be present during the entire rental time. ** The building is NOT available for rent on Thanksgiving, December 24, 25, 31 or January 1. *** The building is available to rent between 8:00am and 9:30pm. -Se-spec-ifie-onTf^e-houfs-yott-'d- 4tk€-sin-ce -someoi^e will-open and close the building for you. River Heights City is dedicated to serving its citizens therefore will allow them.conditional use of the City Building. To maintain a secure and well-maintained facility the following Building Use Policy has been established and must be followed. Deposits, Fees, and Cancellations • Building use is for River Heights' residents wishing to use the building for personal events, such as family gatherings, socials, or private club meetings. Majority of attendees rpusf be River Heights residents. *Non-profit groups must have some affiliation to River Heights. U • Deposit and fees not paid prior to 5 days before the reservation may result in forfeiture of the reservation. • A credit card deposit and rental fee will be required. • A cancellation less than 3 days before reservation may result in a forfeit of the rental fee. The deposit is still refundable. • The deposit may be returned within 10 days after the inspection verifies that no building or property damage has occurred, that no City property is missing, there has been no violation of the rental agreement rules, and the facility is left clean and in orderly condition. River Heights City reserves the right to withhold all or part of the cleaning deposit for any violation of this rental agreement or for any costs incurred to the city. • Any damage over the deposit amount or cleaning costs will be charged to your credit card. • Deposit refunds will be applied back to your credit card. You will receive a receipt by email. • Failure to be out of the building or facility on time may incur an additional fee, which will be withheld from your deposit or charged to your credit card. February 2025  • Fees will be assessed as follows (credit card only): Deposit: $200 Building Use Fee: $ 100 (firsts hours) Additional Hours: $ 30 per hour ♦Fees may be waived or reduced contingent upon City Council approval for non-profit organizations and local government uses. For example; forums regarding River Heights City government, Pro-Log irrigation Co. and town halls with legislature representatives. NOTE: Council approval of fee waiver may take up to three weeks. Building Use • No use or consumption of alcoholic beverages or illicit drugs will be permitted in or around the City Building. • Smoking is not permitted on City property. • Maximum Occupancy is 40 people. • Organizations using the building must use only those areas for which pre-approval has been granted. • Organizations are responsible to leave the building as clean and organized as when they found it. • A vacuum will be available In the kitchen; however, cleaners and rags will not be provided. • Children are welcome at the City Building but must always be under the direct supervision of responsible adults. • Trash must be disposed of and can be placed in the dumpster at the end of the driveway, east of the tennis courts. Extra liners will be provided in the bottom of the can. Lost or Stolen Property • The City of River Heights will not be responsible for the loss or damage of equipment, personal belongings, or other items owned or used by the organization using the building. • Items left for more than 60 days will be utilized or discarded as deemed proper by city staff. IN THE EVENT OF A BUILDING ISSUE CALL CLAYTEN NELSON AT 435-213-6948. I have read and agree to the terms and conditions listed in this policy. Failure to abide by this agreement will result in the loss of reserving privileges for the City Building in the future. I understand that River Heights City assumes no responsibility or liability for accidents or injuries arising from activities conducted at the City Building. I agree to pay for damages that occur to the facility. Including costs exceeding the amount of the deposit. I have received a copy of the Building Renting Guidelines. Signature Date Staff Initials Office Use Only Rent Paid: Date; Deposit Paid; Date: Deposit Refund Amount: Date: February 2025