Police Commission

ROCHESTER POLICE COMMISSION MEETING CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS 31 WAKEFIELD STREET ROCHESTER, NH AGENDA April 1, 2026 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge B. Opening Prayer C. Roll Call by the Clerk 2. PUBLIC COMMENT 3. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES: A. March 4, 2026 4. OLD AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 5. NEW BUSINESS: A. Oath of Office 1. Officer Damon Glastetter B. Accept Resignations: 1. Officer Drew Pare 2. Officer Daniel Newberg 3. Officer Rodney Musto C. Policy Update: 84.1.4.1Voluntarily Relinquished Weapons: Archive D. Monthly Reports 1). Operations 2.) Administration E. Other 6. CORRESPONDENCE A. Specialist Zachary Seely is recognized for clear and concise radio traffic during a structure fire. B. Det. Bibeau and Det. Danie are thanked for kindness and compassion in assisting a resident. C. Off. Marsh, Off. Dale and Off. Newberg for their assistance at a traffic accident. 7. INFORMATION: A. Information Other; enclosed with Agenda: Any discussion. B. Other 8. NON-PUBLIC SESSION: (Pursuant to: RSA 91-A:3) A. RSA 91-A:3 (II-a) Personnel B. RSA 91-A:3 (II-e) Legal  Rochester Police Commission Rochester, NH 03867 David R. Stevens, Commissioner David E. Winship, Jr. Commissioner James P. Gray, Commissioner MINUTES OF THE POLICE COMMISSION MEETING March 4, 2026, at 7:00 P.M. The Rochester Police Commission held their regular monthly meeting on Wednesday, March 4, 2026, at 7:00 P.M. in City Hall Council Chambers. Participants in this meeting: Comm. Stevens, Comm. Winship, Comm. Gray, Chief Boudreau, Dep. Chief Swanberry, Capt. Aucoin, Chaplain Cilley and Sr. Executive Assistant Warburton, invited guests. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. A. All participated in the pledge of allegiance. B. Opening prayer by Chaplain Cilley C. Roll Call. The clerk called the roll marking Comm. Stevens, Comm. Winship and Comm. Gray present. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT – no one presented for public comment. 3. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES: A. February 4, 2026 Comm. Gray MOVED to accept the minutes of the February 4, 2026, meeting as submitted. Comm. Winship SECONDED the motion. The motion to accept the minutes as presented PASSED unanimously. B. February 16, 2026 Comm. Gray MOVED to accept the minutes of February 16, 2026, special meeting as submitted. Comm. Winship SECONDED the motion. The motion to accept the minutes as presented PASSED unanimously. 4. OLD AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS: A. Memorandum of Understanding: Police Commission and Council. (This discussion was taken out of order from the agenda and heard later in the meeting.) Chair Stevens turned this discussion over to Commissioner Gray. Comm. Gray said at his first Police Commission meeting he started looking at the budget and looked at the Memorandum of Understanding that was dated back in the teens and it is now 2026. There is one paragraph I didn’t believe is correct. Once our budget is presented, it is treated like every other budget. The City Charter, Chapter 24 reads: * Rochester Police Commission: 03/04/2026  SECTION 24: DUTIES OF POLICE COMMISSION It shall be the duty of the Board of Police Commissioners authorized hereunder to appoint such police officers, constables, and superior officers as it may in its judgment deem necessary and to fix their compensation; and, to make all rules and regulations for the government of the police force and to enforce the same. Comm. Gray said I don’t know happened the last several years when the budget put in for two police officers but that has been changed by the City Council. In reviewing the minutes that’s never been approved by the Police Commission that that number be reduced. The City Charter gives the Police Commission the authority and the authorization to set that number. Commissioner Gray said I’d like an acknowledgement by the Commission, it is the Commission’s position that how many officers we need going forward and they should be authorized in this budget. Commissioner Stevens said that we submitted for six officers. I support six. Both Commissioner Gray and Winship echoed that support. Comm. Stevens said that the Police Commission supports the six officers. Comm. Gray said it is our position those [positions] are needed to fulfill the portion of the City Charter. Comm. Stevens asked who has the final say in the bottom line of the budget. The Police Commission supports for six additional police officers in the budget and does support the budget as presented by the Chief. Comm. Gray said the second issue is the Police Commission to formally request the agreement between the City Council and Commission be renegotiated. Comm. Stevens said the last version of the MOU was in effect in 2013. It does follow Sections 24 and 25 of the Charter. The MOU expands on communication. I don’t object either way as a Commissioner. I find the last few terms the relationship between the Council, Mayor, City Manager and the Police Commission has been outstanding. There have been times we’ve modified financials and renegotiated contracts earlier and we had the full support of the City to the benefit of the community helping us to retain police officers and personnel, and to recruit personnel. Comm. Stevens said, “If it’s not broke, we don’t need to fix it.” I think if we really had some issues, we could look closer, but I haven’t seen that. Comm. Gray commented. “If it’s not broke, don’t fix it. That is part of my problem.” The Charter gives the Police Commission specific duties, and you can see what the Council has done with that paragraph in that MOU that says it will be treated like any other budget. My opinion, it says “we don’t care what you said.” We are going to do what we think is right for the police department regardless of what the Police Commission said. I invited the City Manager and Mayor here so they can speak to that part. If they are going to treat that budget like any other, you have lost all the control that you had in Section 25, and they are violating that City Charter. Comm. Stevens offered the Mayor and City Manager an opportunity to comment on that. * Rochester Police Commission: 03/04/2026  City Manager Ambrose said I share the same interpretation of the MOU as my predecessor, which is though I wasn’t a party to the MOU signed by City Manager Fitzpatrick, the need to honor MOU’s and other legally binding agreements of predecessors is vital and important for the City to maintain continuity and as well as stability of long-term relationships. This isn’t unique to this agreement. There are many others that we have that were signed by my predecessors that we continue to uphold and to honor. She said it was my experience that the relationship between the Police Commission, the City Manager and City Council has been very positive and collaborative. It’s my intention to continue. If there are any concerns raised, my door is open. City Manager Ambrose said that the MOU itself does acknowledge that the Charter lacks clarity in some areas. The intention of the MOU was to mutually agree upon clarifying those areas regarding the powers and duties between the City Manager and the Police Commission. Where the Charter was not clear regarding some of those functions and the parties at that time agreed here is how we are going to establish those roles and duties. It’s my intention to uphold that. If the majority of the Police Commission feels different then I would bring that to the Council. For now, it’s my intention to honor those stipulations and terms and to continue our relationship. City Manager Ambrose said regarding the budget, I certainly take any requests, issues and options, that come to me and the Council very seriously and take into great consideration. As a reminder we are a tax cap community. So, everything must be looked at in the lens of that reality, our financial health and our needs. As Chair Stevens mentioned, the City Manager and Council have funded requests throughout the years even between budgets for issues related to recruitment, retention or collective bargaining. We honor those needs when feasible and possible in the confines of our financial restrictions. Comm. Gray asked the City Manager, how in the last three budgets have you honored the section of the charter where it says the police commission can set the number of police officers, constables and senior officers. How have you honored that portion of the charter. City Manager Ambrose responded, “I honor the stipulations of the MOU. As dictated and as mutually agreed on in the budget process. I do my best to fund what is feasible within the tax cap and our financial picture. Comm. Gray asked, “Can the MOU supersede the City Charter.” The City Manager replied the MOU is built on and in alignment with the Charter. Comm. Stevens said Sections 24 and 25 are brief with not a lot of details in those sections. We can all read this and come to a different interpretation. That’s a discussion that needs more time. He noted that he did read Attorney Wensley’s opinion from decades ago that clarified whether the Police Commission had control of the staff. To Comm. Gray, he asked, you want the Council to approve the budget the Police Commission sets? Comm. Gray said the first issue was to put the Police Commission on record informing the City Council and City Manager we have determined in accordance with City Charter, Chapters 24 and 25 that we believe and have made the decision that there should be six additional officers. The second part was the request that the MOU be renegotiated because some might think it can supersede the City Charter. There is clear evidence that says the board of Police Commissioners is authorized herein to appoint such officers and constables and superior officers as in its judgement it deems necessary and to fix their compensation. Saying we are going to turn our budget over to [the city manager] * Rochester Police Commission: 03/04/2026 you, and you can do whatever you want with it is not in accordance with this and in my opinion is a violation of the City Charter. Comm. Gray asked, is the Police Commission asking, or not asking, to have the MOU renegotiated or looked at. Comm. Stevens said as Chair, I don’t have an issue looking at the MOU, since the last one was signed in 2013, and there is a whole slate of new people. We can determine do we want an MOU or do we just want to follow sections 24 and 25 of the Charter. This isn’t a point that will get resolved this evening. Mayor Grassie responded. He said the City Council has not discussed this. We know that the School Board is working on a budget that is under the tax cap. They have a statutory charge of adopting a budget for the benefit of education of the children of our city, just as you have a responsibility of developing a budget for the protection of our city. But we have a tax cap. Mr. Gray wants us to ignore the tax cap and say whatever you guys want, if you want six officers, regardless of how it impacts the tax cap. I think that the City Council is very responsive to that and to the needs of our citizens to have protection in the city. We work together and we have worked together, particularly since the MOU, to make sure we stay within the tax cap. If you want to bring in a budget in the tax cap and you want to hire six officers, but we cut three cruisers, maybe that will work, but that’s not responsible. You know that. I know that. Mayor Grassie said I served on this Council when the City Council and the Commissioners didn’t get along together at all, and over the past number of years we’ve had this MOU and we’ve gotten along fine. I think we need to work together. I don’t think we need disruption in this process right now. As you’ve said if it’s not broken you don’t need to fix it. It’s not broken and it works. I think that being responsible to the taxpayers of the City of Rochester is the fiduciary responsibility of the City Council. We have to judge the needs of all the departments in the city as well. Where is our dollar best spent. Where can we best respond to the taxpayers of the city of Rochester. Comm. Stevens commented he is in his fifth term as a police commissioner, and he can say that the Mayor and Council have been very, very, good to work for. The Police Commission hasn’t asked for unreasonable demands. Our leadership in the police department has always done an excellent job of providing a solid budget that will hopefully meet the needs of the city. I and the other Commissioners want more police officers. The chief wants more police officers. But I also do realize that the school wants more teachers. Everything in life is about balance. Mayor Grassie responded that the school department is looking at cutting teachers, not adding teachers. But when you bring a proposal before the City Council requesting six police officers and the Council cuts it to maybe two, it anguishes us to have to do that. We understand that it would make the Chief’s job a heck of a lot easier if he had a full staff and all the officers that he wants. One of the problems we look at as well is that you just can’t hire them. The thing is, we understand that. It’s not something we do as a dalliance. Comm. Gray responded. The Mayor talked about how the City Council works with the School Department. I certainly am willing to do the same kind of thing in the MOU as you do the school dept, but it can’t just be the sworn officers, constables and senior officers. It’s got to be the whole police department budget like the school has their whole budget. If you want me to stay in the tax cap that’s a good reason to renegotiate the MOU and say we’re not going to treat you like any other budget. We’re going to treat you like the school budget, and you will have control over it, line-item control, you won’t have to come ask me if you get grants from somebody, the * Rochester Police Commission: 03/04/2026 Police Commission can accept it like the school accepts it. Put it in the MOU you will treat us like the school budget; however you want to word it, we’re going to set the top dollar number and give you line-item control. But that’s not what it says right now. Comm. Gray said the plain reading of the Charter says I get to pick that number of officers. It has been in my opinion because of the MOU “oh we’re all going to” but we don’t want the Commission to have any power, give it all to the Council. Of course, the City is happy with the MOU because it took away all the authority the commission has in doing those things. To me that’s unacceptable. If it’s acceptable to the other two, I get to hold my breath for the next year and a half. Mayor Grassie responded. I don’t think the MOU took away any power at all. That is how the City Council and the Police Commission operated in the 70’s and 80’s. Comm. Stevens said I think we need a legal opinion on whether a 2013 document without the present Mayor, City Manager and Council and Police Commission is still a valid document or does it expire. Is it a longstanding document that will carry on forever? Mayor Grassie said unless you want to renegotiate it. It’s like an ordinance. If we pass an ordinance the next sitting Council, it doesn’t get voided. This is an agreement that we had with the City of Rochester, Manager and Council and Police Commission, and it’s something that carries on, as any contract would carry on the same way. Comm. Gray said and that was exactly what my request was. That we renegotiate it. Comm. Stevens said I don’t see any issues moving the way we are. But I don’t have any issue looking it over to see if we need to make any changes to anything. I am one vote but I’m not willing to do a 180-degree shift on something that has proven to work, over time. Comm. Stevens said we’ve been doing some great things with recruiting and making good strides. But I’m going to be honest. There is no doubt we are going to need more police officers. The City is growing. All the numbers say we need more police officers. I’d like six, but we are also only one department in the city. I don’t think the police department has been treated badly or unfairly. He asked Comm. Winship’s opinion. Comm. Winship said I think it’s been working fine. I do get Comm. Gray’s standing—that we get the authority to hire. We can hire as many as we want. We can hire thirty people if we want. But we have to find it within our budget to pay them whether it’s taking something else out. Comm. Stevens asked where we need to go from today. Comm. Gray offered a motion. Comm. Gray MOVED to continue the present agreement for six months and in those six months it gets renegotiated. At the end of those six months the Police Commission and the City Council need to decide if they want to do the agreement or not. Comm. Winship SECONDED the motion. Open for discussion. * Rochester Police Commission: 03/04/2026  Comm. Stevens said he feels we can look at the MOU; the Chair can sit with the Mayor and City Manager possibly at an in-depth workshop. I don’t think we need timeframe parameters. I don’t think we need a motion, as long as we agree to relook at the document. Comm. Stevens said there may be things we can improve on, but I don’t think we need to go the motion route. I would vote no. Comm. Gray said the reason the motion was structured the way it was is to get you through the current budget. I don’t anticipate that the Council will honor the Commission’s request for six officers. But that one section in there that you get to treat the budget like any other disregarding what it says in the city charter is incorrect. That time limit is needed to put some pressure on both sides to get it done. It gets you out of the budget and on to the next, and six months from today if either party wants to vacate what has been done or approve what has been negotiated, it’s all there. Deadlines work especially when you are negotiating this kind of stuff. Comm. Gray said unless Comm. Winship withdraws his second, you know which way I’ll be voting. Comm. Stevens said I’m willing to work with them, work with an attorney if needed for legal opinion on any sections, but I do not want the six-month commitment. I want to do it as a sign of good faith that we are willing to do this. If we are not making progress, then at that time maybe a time limit but I don’t think we need to start out that way. Comm. Winship said I’ll withdraw my second. I agree with you on that point that we talk among ourselves. The motion FAILED. Comm. Stevens inquired if anything else needed to be covered. Comm. Gray said, yes, the rest of the staff. The City Charter talks about constables. In looking for a definition of constables in city documents he didn’t find one there, nor in the RSAs, nor in discussion with Commissioner Quinn of the Department of Safety. But there are references throughout the RSA chapter regarding constables. One of the salient points in RSA 106-B:12 and B:1. RSA 106-B:12 Authority and Duties of Police Employees says Police employees shall be ex-officiis constables throughout the state. If you go back to 106-B:1 X defines what a police employee means "Police employee" means any employee who is assigned to police work. Comm. Gray said for discussion going forward if there was a policy in accordance with the Charter that says police employees are assigned police work as listed below are ex officio constables, their duties may include or be limited to animal control, parking control, crime analyst, or evidence technician. This is a proposal and would be in keeping with what the RSA says about constables. According to the statutes they can do certain writs, certain warrants, like an election warrant that’s posted. All those things I listed would be police duties. Just today there was an example that when the evidence technician wasn’t around a police officer did those duties. Dispatchers. We all know when we have been short on dispatchers we’ve taken a police officer for that role. If you go back and look, a lot of those duties were police officers, and we took that police officer out of there because we needed them on the street or in detectives. We needed them in other places and so we said okay we are going to put these other people in. But that statement that I wrote there is good for the RSA. It falls within what I believe the charter says. The Police Commission can make the rules and regulations for the government of the police force and to enforce the same. Therefore, they would become constables regardless of what Attorney Wensley opined. He did not look at it in that * Rochester Police Commission: 03/04/2026 light. The Rochester Police Commission, the Rochester City Council, whomever, says what a constable is and the charter already says that the Police Commission can have control over this so that’s something else as you enter into negotiations, as you said you would do (to Chair Stevens) on this MOU that should be looked at. Comm. Winship said it doesn’t say sworn. Comm. Gray said no, it doesn’t. I had a long conversation with Commissioner Quinn and if they were going to carry a firearm, going to arrest people, that’s when he would like them to be certified, at least by a part time certification or something. But if they were doing parking control, animal control, you don’t have those people certified right now, all you would be doing is adding to their “titles” that they are ex officio constables, right after 106B in the RSA’s. Comm. Stevens said I think constable is an outdated term. If Commissioner Quinn doesn’t even know what it is. It was a term that was used 100 years ago. The problem is the job we have now has become so specialized. A dispatcher is a vital position. A dispatcher is not a constable. I don’t know why we would want to assign other duties or give that person a different title. Why would you want to give a crime analyst a different title and different responsibilities? Mayor Grassie said the first line police employees shall be ex officio constables, that falls in line with what Comm. Winship said. They are not sworn. They are ex-officio, so that means they are not really constables. Comm. Gray asked the Mayor to please read the first line in 106B. Mayor Grassie read “Police employees shall be ex officio constables throughout the state.” Comm. Gray said I mirrored that wording in the proposal because this gives me a basis for doing it. Mayor Grassie said they are not constables. The charter says constables. Comm. Gray replied an ex officio constable is a constable. Mayor Grassie said I’m an ex officio member of a number of committees, but I can’t vote . Comm. Gray said that’s because the Charter says you can’t. Tell me where an ex officio can’t vote in the City Charter. This is not confrontational. This was given to you as one of the things the Police Commission, if we believe as a group, that we should have control over those people. I believe we should have line-item control of the budget in the police department and all of them and that the City Council should have top dollar just like the school department. Just like the Mayor said in his remarks. Comm. Gray said the chair said he’s going to negotiate it. You didn’t want to set a time limit. When you negotiate it, please give this some consideration because I’m here to fight for what is good for the police department. That’s what I’m here for. That’s my job. Comm. Stevens said a lot of other communities follow the state statute that includes staff, but our Charter section 24 and 25 doesn’t include the word staff. If we were following the statute and not our Charter, staff like administrative people would fall under the control of the Police Commission. Whoever did Chapters 24 and 25 didn’t want that in there and it isn’t. I think the intent and reason why it wasn’t in there back then was for the Police Commission control to manage police officers, sworn officers through senior leadership. * Rochester Police Commission: 03/04/2026  Comm. Gray said when Attorney Harkinson drafted the city charter he mirrored what was in the RSA at the time. The RSA was amended to put the staff in. There is an argument for making them constables because the word says we have control over them. I’m perfectly willing to take out the words ex officio and make them just constables, Mayor. Comm. Stevens asked, is there anything in there that says a constable is animal control or parking. Maybe you can infer that, but I haven’t seen that. Comm. Gray said the statutes listed a whole bunch of things that a constable can do. Motor vehicle, animal control and several other things. Those are duties of constables. If they are serving a writ or a warrant it had to be less than $75. Posting the warrant at the polling places would be one of the things they can do. Comm. Stevens asked for final thoughts before closing this discussion. He noted that he commits to reaching out to the City Manager to start this discussion. To possibly get an updated legal opinion, newer than thirty years. He said, the whole commission is part of this process, it won’t be the Chair doing all the work. Comm. Gray said I’m not saying the statute or the charter gives you control over the staff. If you adopted the policy that is here it would be in accordance with what the city charter says and in accordance with what is already existing in RSA 106B. You would have control over the staff because the city charter says constables and you would call them constables. Comm. Stevens said this is an important debate. I’m not sure the Police Commission needs control over the staff. They fall under something else with merit plans etc. I’m not sure we need day-to-day control. Chief Boudreau interjected with “they do fall under something else.” Under RSA105-2A Police Chiefs; Powers “each chief of police, superintendent of police, or city marshal of any city or town who is appointed rather than elected, shall have authority to direct and control all employees of his or her department in their normal course of duty and shall be responsible for the efficient and economical use of all department equipment.” That specifically gives me the authority, the day-to-day authority over operations. Comm. Gray asked does it say “hire and fire…” Chief Boudreau said no. Comm. Gray asked does it say, “set rules and regulations for the government of...” Chief Boudreau said no. Comm. Gray said so in the City Charter, those things are reserved for the Police Commission. Chief Boudreau said even though dispatchers, parking, animal control and evidence don’t fall under Commission, they fall under mine. Comm. Gray said as discussed previously two Commissioners are a quorum and can’t have these discussions outside of a meeting as it would violate RSA 91A. We need to look at the Rochester Police Department and see if there’s other positions that would not be sworn officers but can be done by other people and reduce the cost to the Department because you are having difficulty getting sworn officers anyway. * Rochester Police Commission: 03/04/2026  This is not an effort to break the budget. I’m trying to follow the plain reading of the City Charter. The MOU doesn’t follow the plain reading of the City Charter. You [the commission] have abdicated your responsibility once you throw that budget over the fence into Kate’s office. According to that MOU you no longer have any control over it at all. In the ten years that I spent on the City Council I think the Police Commission testified maybe twice out of the ten years. Did we follow what they said? Not really. That’s not what the charter says. Mea Culpa, Mea Culpa. I was part of that. Comm. Stevens said I appreciate the discussion. Comm. Gray and I have some differences of opinion. This concluded the discussion on the MOU. The City Manager and Mayor left the meeting at 8:20 P.M. 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Oath of Office – Hiring 1. Vanessa Simms Chief Boudreau introduced Officer Simms and provided some background information about her. She is NH certified. Sr. Executive Assistant Warburton administered the oath to Officer Simms. B. Annual Awards 2025. The annual awards for Support of the Year, Officer of the Year, and the Chief Theodore Blair, Jr. Memorial award, were presented. Members are nominated for these awards by their peers. Awardees were presented with plaques noting this achievement. The Blair family was on hand to assist with the Memorial Award. Those selected were: Support Person of the Year 2025: Ed Cilley, Evidence Technician Police Officer of the Year 2025: Officer Tiana Adams Chief Theodore Blair, Jr. Memorial Award: Detective Justin Livingstone A brief recess was called. The meeting returned to session at 7:30 P.M. B. Monthly Reports. 1. Operations: Captain Aucoin noted that patrol had responded to approximately 1960 calls for service this period. There were no concerning trends. Although there was an increase in fraud-related calls, still there were no trends. Proactive traffic enforcement there were 355 traffic stops. Over in support the Cadets had some training at the range. Comm. Stevens asked how many we have in the program. Chief Boudreau responded roughly 15 cadets in the program currently. There have been cadets who have gone on to become police officers or moved into other roles connected. It’s a good program for our youth. The School Resource Officers have been busy teaching LEAD classes. We held our final Teen night of this school year in February. There were 120 in attendance. * Rochester Police Commission: 03/04/2026  In Communications we have one candidate in the final background review and hope this brings us to full staff. There was a webinar for dispatch on responding to hoaxing and swatting calls, which is essentially a false call that commands an immediate response. 2. Administrative. Dep. Chief Swanberry advised that all budget lines are where we should be at this time of the year. Our projection looks good. Officer Newberg is in phase three of field training. Officer Palladino and Officer Demo are in Phase 1. The recruits at the academy are progressing and have completed 8 weeks. Officer Simms and Officer Mosto were hired within a week of each other, and we anticipate them moving through the training program together. Some of the training they have had, such as firearms, use of force, taser, defensive tactics, but we’ve found it important as we bring on officers to have a refresh of that training. At the time of this report, we had five open positions with three candidates in the background process. C. Other. 1. Skate with a First Responder. We will be holding the annual skating event, previously called skate with a cop to now be skate with a first responder. This will be followed by a round robin hockey tournament with teams represented by Dover, Rochester, Spaulding High Alumni and the Veteran group Skatefor22 Organization. It’s free and it’s fun. Come join us on Sunday March 8 at the Rochester Ice Arena. 6. CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence received during this period. 7. NON-PUBLIC SESSION: (Pursuant to: RSA 91-A:3) Commissioner Gray MOVED to enter a non-public session at 8:27 P.M. pursuant to RSA 91- A: 3, paragraph II, section A (personnel) and section E (legal). Comm. Winship SECONDED the motion. The motion PASSED by roll call vote: Comm. Gray – yes, Comm. Winship – yes, Comm. Stevens – yes. The non-public session closed at 9:01 P.M. on a MOTION by Comm. Stevens and SECONDED by Comm. Gray. The motion PASSED unanimously. 8. MISCELLANEOUS Comm. Gray MOVED to accept the evaluations presented in nonpublic for Off. Dwayne Hatch, Off. Matthew Flathers and Sgt. Cory Krochmal (all top of grade), along with merit track advancement for Off. Brennan Garland Step 1-2, Off. Claire Brough Step 2-3, Off. Brian Dale Step 4-5, Off. Benjamin Gleason Step 5-6, Off. Matthew Kimball Step 7-8, Sgt. Hattie Johnson Step 2-3. Comm. Winship SECONDED the motion. The motion PASSED unanimously. * Rochester Police Commission: 03/04/2026 9. ADJOURNMENT: Comm. Stevens adjourned the meeting at 9:02 P.M. Respectfully Submitted, Rebecca J. Warburton Sr. Executive Assistant Adopted: * Rochester Police Commission: 03/04/2026  ROCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICE COMMISSION 23 WAKEFIELD STREET ROCHESTER NH, 03867-1933 DAVID R. STEVENS Commissioner BUSINESS (603) 330-7127 DAVID E. WINSHIP, JR. GARY M. BOUDREAU FAX (603) 330-7159 Commissioner Chief of Police www.rochesterpd.org JAMES P. GRAY Commissioner “Dedication, Pride, Integrity" April 1, 2026 I, Damon Glastetter do solemnly swear that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent on me as a Patrol Officer with the Rochester Police Department, according to the best of my ability, agreeable to the rules and regulations of the Constitution and the Laws of the State of New Hampshire, so help me God. Damon Glastetter STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE STRAFFORD, SS: Then the above named Damon Glastetter , appeared and took oath of Office by law prescribed. Before me Rebecca J. Warburton Justice of the Peace “Equal Opportunity Employer”  Rochester Police Department 23 Wakefield Street Rochester, New Hampshire 03867 (603) 330-7127 POLICY # 84.1.4.1 SUBJECT: Voluntarily Relinquished Weapons NOTE: This written directive is for the internal governance of the Rochester Police Department, and as provided by RSA 516:36, is not intended and should not be interpreted to establish a higher standard of care in any civil or criminal action than would otherwise be applicable under existing law. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Standard Operating Procedure is to establish uniform procedures for the handling of voluntarily relinquished weapons within the Rochester Police Department. DISCUSSION: It is the policy of this Department to accept firearms, which have been voluntarily surrendered for destruction. All weapons surrendered pursuant to this policy shall be destroyed. 1. PROCEDURE: A. Acceptance of Weapons: 1. The officer shall complete an incident report which contains the following information: a. Date, Time and Place of transfer b. Make, model and serial number of firearms c. Identification of the individual relinquishing the weapon d. A waiver which declares the owner's intent to have the weapon destroyed 2. If the individual refuses to complete the waiver or wishes to remain anonymous, the Department shall follow procedures already in place for disposing of unclaimed property, except that weapons shall not be sold at public auction. B. Verification Procedures: 1. The officer shall run an NCIC Check on the weapon. 2. If the officer suspects the weapon has been used in a crime, the weapon should be test fired and the projectile retained for use as evidence. If the officer doubts that the individual relinquishing the weapon is the owner, or if the individual  makes no such representation, the officer shall make a reasonable effort to ascertain ownership of the weapon before proceeding with it's destruction. C. Destruction Procedure: 1. The weapon shall be held for six (6) months before being destroyed. 2. Immediately preceding destruction of the weapon, a second NCIC check shall be performed by the evidence officer. 3. All weapons will be transferred to the State Police Forensic Lab for destruction. The weapon shall be accompanied by DSSP-20, (lab submittal form) and a court order, if required, or waiver requesting that the weapon be destroyed. _____________________________________________________ APPROVED: GARY M. BOUDREAU CHIEF OF POLICE  ROCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT ROCHESTER, NH 03867 RELEASE AND WAIVER Policy Standard 84.1.4.1 The undersigned hereby releases to the ROCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT all right, title and interest in the following weapon(s): _________________________ It is the intent of this release that the undersigned, as the owner of the above described weapon(s) forever waives any rights to ownership and authorizes the ROCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT to destroy said weapon(s) without the need for further notice to the owner. OWNER: DATE: ___________________ WITNESS: DATE: ___________________ March 2026 Patrol Monthly Activity Report Rochester NH Police Department  The report below outlines the calls for service our Records Management System (RMS) categorizes as some of the different calls for service types we respond to. Overview There were no concerning trends during this reporting period. It should be noted that higher percent changes in some calls for service may be misleading, as the actual difference in total call volume in minimal. There were no trends this month.  Police Reports Generated: 220 Arrest Reports: 70 Reports NIBRS Reports:36 Non-NIBRS Reports: 89 Accident Reports: 25  Reporting Period Comparison Period 03/01/2025- Percentage Of CFS Classification Change 03/01/2026-03/24/2026 03/24/2025 Change ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES 802 635 168 26.46% AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 0 0 0 0.00% ALL OTHER OFFENSES 89 78 11 14.10% ANIMAL COMPLAINTS 30 37 -7 -18.92% ASSISTING OTHER AGENCIES 44 25 19 76.00% BURGLARY 1 2 -1 -50.00% DEATHS / SUICIDES 3 1 2 200.00% DISORDERLY CONDUCT 33 14 19 135.71% DWI / DUI 4 5 -1 -20.00% FAMILY OFFENSE 28 36 -8 -22.22% FIRE RELATED 6 9 -3 -33.33% Rochester FRAUD LOST FOUND MISSING 11 25 12 24 -1 1 -8.33% 4.17% Overall MALICIOUS MISCHIEF MV CRASH INVESTIGATIONS 7 60 10 54 -3 6 -30.00% 11.11% Incident MV THEFT NARCOTIC DRUG LAWS 1 3 5 0 -4 3 -80.00% 300.00% Report NON CRIMINAL INCIDENTS PARKING ENFORCEMENT 185 61 185 167 0 -106 0.00% -63.47% Comparisons PUBLIC SERVICE 158 198 -40 -20.20% ROBBERY 0 0 0 0.00% RUNAWAYS 6 3 3 100.00% SEARCH AND RESCUE 1 1 0 0.00% SEX OFFENSE ALL OTHERS 1 3 -2 -66.67% SIMPLE ASSAULT 6 4 2 50.00% SPECIAL UNIT ACTIVITY CODES 0 2 -2 -100.00% THEFT 20 28 -7 -25.00% TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT 274 752 -478 -63.56% TRAFFIC RELATED SERVICE 70 32 38 118.75% UNKNOWN 2 2 0 0.00% WARRANTS LOCAL 15 23 -8 -34.78% WEAPONS 2 2 0 0.00% Total 1948 2349 -401 -17.07%  March CFS Comparison 3-Year CFS Comparison 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 2024 2025 2026 3-Year CFS Comparison 2,327 3,098 1,953 3-Year CFS Comparison ** The data for 2024 and 2025 reflects the full month of March. In comparison, the 2026 data represents the period of March 1 through March 24 at the time of this report. ** March 2026 MV Crashes 60 MV Crash 3 Hit & Run Investigations Crashes 6 Charges/Arrests  Total DUI/DWI Incidents: 4 DWI Incidents Total DUI Impairment Arrests: 5 **Note: 'DUI/DWI Incidents' reflects calls for service related to suspected DUI/DWI. 'DUI Impairment Arrests' reflects the number of individuals arrested for operating under the influence. These arrests may originate from various types of calls for service and are not limited to incidents initally dispatched as DUI/DWI. **  Drug Incidents 3 NARCOTIC DRUG LAWS 3/0 OVERDOSES/FATALITIES K9 Monthly for March 2026 • K9 Ripley and Officer Hatch successfully conducted a track for a runaway juvenile, resulting in the juvenile being safely located. March 2026 Specific Crimes CFS Classification Reporting Period Comparison Period 03/01/2026-03/24/2026 03/01/2025-03/24/2025 Change Percentage Of Change AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 0 0 0 0.00% BURGLARY 1 2 -1 -50.00% DISORDERLY CONDUCT 33 14 19 135.71% FAMILY OFFENSE 28 36 -8 -22.22% FRAUD 11 12 -1 -8.33% MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 7 10 -3 -30.00% ROBBERY 0 0 0 0.00% SIMPLE ASSAULT 6 4 2 50.00% THEFT 21 28 -7 -25.00% UNKNOWN 0 0 0 0.00% Total 107 106 1 0.94 % Proactive Enforcement • RPD conducted 274 traffic stops throughout the city of Rochester. • Please note that staffing levels in March 2026 included 27 officers on patrol, compared to 33 in March 2025. Training, vacation, and sick leave further limited proactive activity.  Support Monthly March 2026 SUPPORT DIVISION INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES BUREAU (ISB) March March 2026 To 2025 To 2026 2025 Date Date New ISB Case Assignments 19 18 66 288 Cases Being Investigated 81 62 235 268 Felony Charges 75 62 221 691 Misdemeanor Charges 4 0 12 19 Grand Jury Cases Presented 15 20 39 193 Cases Closed W/O Charges 11 8 23 46 ISB Callouts 0 3 5 40 Evidence Callouts 0 0 2 6 Digital Device Extractions 9 11 36 154 Background Investigations 0 4 4 46 Polygraph Examinations 0 2 2 29 SIGNIFICANT/NOTEABLE MONTHLY ACTIVITY: • Assisted with Active shooter training with another agency • Trained new hires in Domestic Violence • Trained Police Explorers in Domestic Violence • Attended Strafford County collaborative intel meeting JUVENILE BUREAU: Prosecution: • Petitions to Court: 76 • Petitions to DHHS: 44 • CHINS: 0 • Cases to Diversion: 1 Middle School SRO: • Mentoring students • Assisted administration with school issues • Assisted Patrol with investigations • Assisted East Rochester School with administration issues • Assisted East Rochester School issues with students riding e-bikes to school • Assisted McCleland School with administration issues • Assisted the Gonic School regarding issues with parents • Assisted with students’ arrival departure/traffic issues, checking doors, monitor hallways, lunch duty  High School SRO: • Taught Law Enforcement Against Drugs (LEADS) classes • Training related to Swatting calls • Assisted administration with school issues • Attended meeting with Juvenile Probation Parole Officers • Assisted Administration with student related issues • Worked on yearly training for 3x2’s • Conducted several investigations over the month • Neo Gov training • Worked with the administration with student related issues. • Worked with the Guidance Department on school related issues • Normal monthly activities at school, monitor students arrival departure/traffic issues, checking doors, monitor hallways, lunch duty, deal with possible issues outside of the building Juvenile Division: New Diversion Cases = 1 Closed Diversion Cases = 2 Cases returned unsuccessful = 0 Total open cases throughout month = 4 Total cases moving forward to next month = 4 • Guns & Hoses Hockey Tournament and Skate w/a First Responder March 8th had an attendance of approx. 350 • Attended Teen Night de-debrief with the Rec Center Staff • Working on the calendar for summer Teen Travel Camp • Taught LEAD classes at Spaulding High School • Working with the school to plan Alcohol Awareness Month and the Pre-prom activities promoting no drinking and planning different activities for the students • Working with Domestic Violence Detective to create a Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault awareness training for high school students for the 2026/2027 school year • Attended several boards/committees below is a list of the different groups that she has attended meetings throughout the month:  Strafford County Prevention Leadership Group  Rochester Mental Health Alliance  NH Juvenile Court Diversion Network  Alliance for Mental Illness and Suicide Prevention • Participated in a training with the Alliance for Mental Health for a training certificate Housing: • Still actively recruiting to fill this role. COMMUNICATIONS CENTER: • Staffing: One opening – the last applicant did not progress through the background phase and the position has been posted again. • Training: Dispatchers attended a training at the Conway Police Department regarding Priority Callers. • Projects: Working on looking into new call recording software; working with our vendor regarding our portables and radio reception; working on an active shooter drill or exercise; finishing the retirement wall. • Renovations to Dispatch Center: All equipment has been delivered and the Center is fully finished. DEPARTMENT March 2025 March 2026 2026 To Date 2025 To Date TOTAL 3098 2680 9034 10129 FIRE 261 200 830 569 POLICE 2376 2123 6647 7696 EMS 630 436 1557 1864 Respectfully Jeremy Aucoin Captain  ADMINSTRATIVE MONTHLY REPORT March 2026 Financial/Purchasing:  All O&M lines are within expected ranges for this point in the fiscal year.  The FY27 budget building process is continuing; there have been no changes from this department since the last reporting period. Training:  Throughout the month, all officers started and/or completed the mandated training for Ethics, De-Escalation, and Prioritizing Mental Health Wellness and Resilience. These trainings collectively span 5 hours for each officer.  Officer Keven Miller attended a defensive tactics certification course at the Sig Sauer Academy. Officer Miller is a defensive tactics instructor and will incorporate this training into our in-house program.  Officers Jason Harris and Rachel Hill have started the initial training towards becoming certified as Drug Recognition Experts.  The Police Department hosted the course, Crypto Investigation Essentials, presented by Dirigo Safety. 4 of our staff attended: Detective Jonathan Labosier, Detective Alexander Howardkoppes, Officer Tiana Adams, and Officer Claire Brough.  Officer Benjamin Gleason attended Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training.  Lieutenant Spencer Williams-Hurley attended SWAT Operations Planning presented by NHTOA. This course was in addition to his regular monthly SWAT training.  Chief Boudreau attended the FBI-LEEDA Regional Command College.  Officers Sauriol and Bernatchez have completed 12 weeks at the recruit academy. Their graduation date will be April 24.  Officer Palladino is preparing for the examination to convert his certification to a New Hampshire certification through the academy.  Officers Demo, Mosto, and Simms are in field training. All three of these officers come from New Hampshire agencies, so we are anticipating abbreviated field training times. Hiring/Recruiting:  We currently have 7 open full-time positions. There are 2 candidates that are active in the hiring process.  We have 4 officers on administrative leave. 1 officer is currently deployed with the military. 1 officer will deploy next month. In May/June, 3 more officers will be deployed. As noted above, our 7 newest officers are in varying stages of training and not on solo patrol. At the time of this report, the department is operating with 46 of its 65 allotted full-time officers (71%).  We continue to interview candidates. Of the 4 applications received in March, zero candidates progressed to the background investigation stage. Ongoing Projects:  We have completed our testing and evaluation period for our replacement handguns. Several officers tested various models, and their feedback was valuable in our final determination. We will be starting the bid process for this project. Respectfully Submitted, Andrew Swanberry Deputy Chief of Police March 2026 Expense & Revenue Reports CITY OF ROCHESTER MARCH 2026 PD FINANCIALS FOR 2026 09 ACCOUNTS FOR: ORIGINAL TRANFRS/ REVISED AVAILABLE PCT 1000 GENERAL FUND APPROP ADJSTMTS BUDGET YTD EXPENDED ENC/REQ BUDGET USED 12010053 PD ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 12010053 511001 SALARIES - FULL 1,051,219 0 1,051,219 595,272.33 .00 455,946.67 56.6% 12010053 511002 SALARIES - PART 135,377 0 135,377 102,269.30 .00 33,107.70 75.5% 12010053 511003 SALARIES - EARL 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 511004 SALARIES - HOLI 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 511005 SALARIES - OUTS 210,000 0 210,000 150,903.30 .00 59,096.70 71.9% 12010053 511099 SALARIES - ADJU 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 513001 OVERTIME - REGU 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 513002 OVERTIME - TRAI 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 513004 OVERTIME GRANT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 514000 EDUCATION INCEN 6,500 0 6,500 4,749.81 .00 1,750.19 73.1% 12010053 516000 LONGEVITY 3,375 0 3,375 3,433.31 .00 -58.31 101.7% 12010053 521100 HEALTH INSURANC 134,345 0 134,345 66,999.86 .00 67,345.14 49.9% 12010053 521200 DENTAL INSURANC 2,381 0 2,381 1,355.74 .00 1,025.26 56.9% 12010053 521300 LIFE INSURANCE 2,284 0 2,284 1,188.32 .00 1,095.68 52.0% 12010053 522000 SOCIAL SECURITY 23,628 0 23,628 12,164.83 .00 11,463.17 51.5% 12010053 523000 RETIREMENT CONT 380,148 0 380,148 201,504.32 .00 178,643.68 53.0% 12010053 523300 RETIREMENT STAT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 525000 UNEMPLOYMENT CO 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 526000 WORKERS' COMPEN 112,316 0 112,316 114,894.18 .00 -2,578.18 102.3% 12010053 528001 DISABILITY INSU 9,705 0 9,705 5,286.51 .00 4,418.49 54.5% 12010053 531002 STIPEND 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 532001 STAFF DEVELOPME 29,786 0 29,786 13,677.65 5,995.00 10,113.35 66.0% 12010053 532200 CONTRACTED SERV 0 0 0 5,250.00 .00 -5,250.00 100.0% 12010053 533003 PHOTO DEVELOPME 300 0 300 .00 .00 300.00 .0% 12010053 533004 MEDICAL SERVICE 9,425 0 9,425 4,060.00 5,365.00 .00 100.0% 12010053 533005 ANIMAL CONTROL 1,000 0 1,000 700.00 300.00 .00 100.0% 12010053 533009 LEGAL 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 533010 LABOR NEGOTIATI 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 533011 ANIMAL BOARDING 5,000 0 5,000 1,600.00 3,400.00 .00 100.0% 12010053 534001 STATE FEE COMPU 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 534003 SOFTWARE MAINT/ 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 541100 WATER/SEWAGE 4,160 0 4,160 1,776.60 1,223.40 1,160.00 72.1% 12010053 543001 VEHICLES MAINT 41,500 0 41,500 19,835.84 3,811.56 17,852.60 57.0% 12010053 543002 EQUIPMENT MAINT 55,410 0 55,410 42,635.77 4,820.89 7,953.34 85.6% 12010053 543500 INSURANCE CLAIM 5,000 0 5,000 3,742.46 .00 1,257.54 74.8% 12010053 544200 RENTAL OF EQUIP 400 0 400 .00 400.00 .00 100.0% 12010053 544500 LEASE COPIER/PR 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 544900 RENTAL OF OTHER 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 552001 FLEET INSURANCE 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 552002 PROPERTY INSURA 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% Report generated: 03/25/2026 10:31 Page 1 User: rhonda.morganti Program ID: glytdbud CITY OF ROCHESTER MARCH 2026 PD FINANCIALS FOR 2026 09 ACCOUNTS FOR: ORIGINAL TRANFRS/ REVISED AVAILABLE PCT 1000 GENERAL FUND APPROP ADJSTMTS BUDGET YTD EXPENDED ENC/REQ BUDGET USED 12010053 552003 GENERAL LIABILI 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 552004 OFFICERS LIABIL 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 553000 COMMUNICATIONS 52,783 0 52,783 24,763.18 2,722.13 25,297.69 52.1% 12010053 553400 POSTAGE FEES 8,475 0 8,475 5,006.67 .00 3,468.33 59.1% 12010053 554000 ADVERTISING 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 555000 PRINTING AND BI 4,500 0 4,500 1,008.94 1,410.66 2,080.40 53.8% 12010053 556000 TUITION 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 558000 TRAVEL 7,550 0 7,550 1,106.83 1,322.72 5,120.45 32.2% 12010053 561003 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5,473 0 5,473 3,757.24 145.90 1,569.86 71.3% 12010053 561005 PUBLICATIONS 960 0 960 607.63 .00 352.37 63.3% 12010053 561006 AMMUNITION 38,756 0 38,756 2,000.00 .00 36,756.00 5.2% 12010053 561008 VEHICLE SUPPLIE 15,610 0 15,610 1,736.77 .00 13,873.23 11.1% 12010053 561009 TRAINING MATERI 350 0 350 347.96 .00 2.04 99.4% 12010053 561010 CLOTHING 80,500 0 80,500 34,822.12 6,712.17 38,965.71 51.6% 12010053 561032 OTHER OPERATION 20,574 0 20,574 8,764.10 1,581.86 10,228.04 50.3% 12010053 562200 ELECTRICITY 58,000 0 58,000 47,093.77 12,718.96 -1,812.73 103.1% 12010053 562400 HEATING FUEL 10,500 0 10,500 5,312.01 5,187.99 .00 100.0% 12010053 562600 VEHICLE FUEL 82,124 0 82,124 42,152.94 50.00 39,921.06 51.4% 12010053 573200 NEW VEHICLES 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 573401 ADMIN EQUIPMENT 1,500 0 1,500 1,211.29 239.99 48.72 96.8% 12010053 573900 OTHER EQUIPMENT 17,492 0 17,492 3,772.96 556.75 13,162.29 24.8% 12010053 581000 DUES AND FEES 5,575 0 5,575 1,255.00 515.00 3,805.00 31.7% 12010053 581100 DONATION EXPEND 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 589003 SEIZED PROPERTY 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 589004 SEIZED PROPERTY 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 589005 DARE CONTRIBUTI 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 589006 DARE CONTRIBUTI 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 589007 CITY WIDE PROGR 9,228 0 9,228 6,574.22 2,599.80 53.98 99.4% 12010053 589100 LLEBG 102 RECEI 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 589101 LLEBG 102 FEDER 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 589102 LLEBG 102 CITY 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 589113 LLEBG 115 RECEI 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 589114 LLEBG 115 FEDER 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 589115 LLEBG 115 CITY 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 589130 COPSMORE 032 RE 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 589131 COPSMORE 032 FE 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12010053 589132 COPSMORE 032 CI 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% TOTAL PD ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2,643,209 0 2,643,209 1,544,593.76 61,079.78 1,037,535.46 60.7% 12012453 PD PATROL SERVICES 12012453 511001 SALARIES - FULL 4,601,287 0 4,601,287 3,214,828.48 .00 1,386,458.52 69.9% Report generated: 03/25/2026 10:31 Page 2 User: rhonda.morganti Program ID: glytdbud CITY OF ROCHESTER MARCH 2026 PD FINANCIALS FOR 2026 09 ACCOUNTS FOR: ORIGINAL TRANFRS/ REVISED AVAILABLE PCT 1000 GENERAL FUND APPROP ADJSTMTS BUDGET YTD EXPENDED ENC/REQ BUDGET USED 12012453 511002 SALARIES - PART 170,215 0 170,215 100,964.92 .00 69,250.08 59.3% 12012453 511003 SALARIES - EARL 142,491 0 142,491 51,609.73 .00 90,881.27 36.2% 12012453 511004 SALARIES - HOLI 0 0 0 22,692.79 .00 -22,692.79 100.0% 12012453 511099 SALARIES - ADJU 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 513001 OVERTIME - REGU 111,546 0 111,546 230,031.91 .00 -118,485.91 206.2% 12012453 513002 OVERTIME - TRAI 105,000 0 105,000 39,093.74 .00 65,906.26 37.2% 12012453 513004 OVERTIME GRANT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 514000 EDUCATION INCEN 8,500 0 8,500 5,403.63 .00 3,096.37 63.6% 12012453 515001 ON CALL 7,800 0 7,800 13,350.00 .00 -5,550.00 171.2% 12012453 516000 LONGEVITY 8,000 0 8,000 5,000.00 .00 3,000.00 62.5% 12012453 521100 HEALTH INSURANC 572,021 0 572,021 346,821.85 .00 225,199.15 60.6% 12012453 521200 DENTAL INSURANC 12,546 0 12,546 7,803.10 .00 4,742.90 62.2% 12012453 521300 LIFE INSURANCE 3,076 0 3,076 1,939.48 .00 1,136.52 63.1% 12012453 522000 SOCIAL SECURITY 72,273 0 72,273 52,255.42 .00 20,017.58 72.3% 12012453 523000 RETIREMENT CONT 1,522,527 0 1,522,527 1,074,735.41 .00 447,791.59 70.6% 12012453 523300 11539 RETIREMENT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 525000 UNEMPLOYMENT CO 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 526000 WORKERS' COMPEN 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 528001 DISABILITY INSU 0 0 0 37.81 .00 -37.81 100.0% 12012453 532001 STAFF DEVELOPME 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 533003 PHOTO DEVELOPME 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 533004 MEDICAL SERVICE 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 533005 ANIMAL CONTROL 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 533011 ANIMAL BOARDING 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 543001 VEHICLES MAINT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 543002 EQUIPMENT MAINT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 544200 RENTAL OF EQUIP 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 544900 RENTAL OF OTHER 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 553000 COMMUNICATIONS 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 553400 POSTAGE FEES 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 554000 ADVERTISING 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 555000 PRINTING AND BI 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 556000 TUITION 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 558000 TRAVEL 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 561003 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 561005 PUBLICATIONS 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 561010 CLOTHING 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 561032 OTHER OPERATION 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 562600 09529 VEHICLE FU 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 573200 NEW VEHICLES 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 573401 ADMIN EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 573900 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012453 581000 DUES AND FEES 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% TOTAL PD PATROL SERVICES 7,337,282 0 7,337,282 5,166,568.27 .00 2,170,713.73 70.4% Report generated: 03/25/2026 10:31 Page 3 User: rhonda.morganti Program ID: glytdbud CITY OF ROCHESTER MARCH 2026 PD FINANCIALS FOR 2026 09 ACCOUNTS FOR: ORIGINAL TRANFRS/ REVISED AVAILABLE PCT 1000 GENERAL FUND APPROP ADJSTMTS BUDGET YTD EXPENDED ENC/REQ BUDGET USED 12012553 PD SUPPORT SERVICES 12012553 511001 SALARIES - FULL 333,599 0 333,599 247,809.52 .00 85,789.48 74.3% 12012553 511002 SALARIES - PART 249,030 0 249,030 128,776.54 .00 120,253.46 51.7% 12012553 511003 SALARIES - EARL 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 511004 SALARIES - HOLI 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 511099 SALARIES - ADJU 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 513001 OVERTIME - REGU 3,000 0 3,000 1,249.47 .00 1,750.53 41.6% 12012553 513002 OVERTIME - TRAI 0 0 0 15.00 .00 -15.00 100.0% 12012553 513004 OVERTIME GRANT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 514000 EDUCATION INCEN 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 516000 LONGEVITY 2,200 0 2,200 1,750.00 .00 450.00 79.5% 12012553 521100 HEALTH INSURANC 44,247 0 44,247 34,773.77 .00 9,473.23 78.6% 12012553 521200 DENTAL INSURANC 1,181 0 1,181 845.46 .00 335.54 71.6% 12012553 521300 LIFE INSURANCE 727 0 727 512.37 .00 214.63 70.5% 12012553 522000 SOCIAL SECURITY 44,315 0 44,315 28,855.46 .00 15,459.54 65.1% 12012553 523000 RETIREMENT CONT 43,197 0 43,197 31,755.44 .00 11,441.56 73.5% 12012553 523300 11539 RETIREMENT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 525000 UNEMPLOYMENT CO 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 526000 WORKERS' COMPEN 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 528001 DISABILITY INSU 3,612 0 3,612 2,519.94 .00 1,092.06 69.8% 12012553 532001 STAFF DEVELOPME 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 533003 PHOTO DEVELOPME 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 533004 MEDICAL SERVICE 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 543001 VEHICLES MAINT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 543002 EQUIPMENT MAINT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 544200 RENTAL OF EQUIP 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 544900 RENTAL OF OTHER 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 553000 COMMUNICATIONS 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 553400 POSTAGE FEES 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 554000 ADVERTISING 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 555000 PRINTING AND BI 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 556000 TUITION 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 558000 TRAVEL 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 561003 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 561005 PUBLICATIONS 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 561009 TRAINING MATERI 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 561010 CLOTHING 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 561032 OTHER OPERATION 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 562600 09529 VEHICLE FU 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 573200 NEW VEHICLES 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 573401 ADMIN EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% Report generated: 03/25/2026 10:31 Page 4 User: rhonda.morganti Program ID: glytdbud CITY OF ROCHESTER MARCH 2026 PD FINANCIALS FOR 2026 09 ACCOUNTS FOR: ORIGINAL TRANFRS/ REVISED AVAILABLE PCT 1000 GENERAL FUND APPROP ADJSTMTS BUDGET YTD EXPENDED ENC/REQ BUDGET USED 12012553 573900 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 581000 DUES AND FEES 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12012553 589007 CITY WIDE PROGR 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% TOTAL PD SUPPORT SERVICES 725,108 0 725,108 478,862.97 .00 246,245.03 66.0% TOTAL GENERAL FUND 10,705,599 0 10,705,599 7,190,025.00 61,079.78 3,454,494.22 67.7% TOTAL EXPENSES 10,705,599 0 10,705,599 7,190,025.00 61,079.78 3,454,494.22 Report generated: 03/25/2026 10:31 Page 5 User: rhonda.morganti Program ID: glytdbud CITY OF ROCHESTER MARCH 2026 PD FINANCIALS FOR 2026 09 ORIGINAL TRANFRS/ REVISED AVAILABLE PCT APPROP ADJSTMTS BUDGET YTD EXPENDED ENC/REQ BUDGET USED GRAND TOTAL 10,705,599 0 10,705,599 7,190,025.00 61,079.78 3,454,494.22 67.7% ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Rhonda Morganti ** Report generated: 03/25/2026 10:31 Page 6 User: rhonda.morganti Program ID: glytdbud CITY OF ROCHESTER MARCH 2026 DISPATCH FINANCIALS FOR 2026 09 ACCOUNTS FOR: ORIGINAL TRANFRS/ REVISED AVAILABLE PCT 1000 GENERAL FUND APPROP ADJSTMTS BUDGET YTD EXPENDED ENC/REQ BUDGET USED 12030153 DISPATCH CENTER 12030153 511001 SALARIES - FULL 613,863 0 613,863 456,561.79 .00 157,301.21 74.4% 12030153 511002 SALARIES - PART 46,414 0 46,414 43,688.13 .00 2,725.87 94.1% 12030153 511004 SALARIES - HOLI 0 0 0 2,881.76 .00 -2,881.76 100.0% 12030153 511005 SALARIES - OUTS 0 0 0 2,981.84 .00 -2,981.84 100.0% 12030153 511012 SHIFT DIFFERENT 0 0 0 14,249.25 .00 -14,249.25 100.0% 12030153 511099 SALARIES - ADJU 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12030153 513001 OVERTIME - REGU 34,000 0 34,000 46,151.08 .00 -12,151.08 135.7% 12030153 513002 OVERTIME-TRAINI 10,000 0 10,000 4,287.98 .00 5,712.02 42.9% 12030153 516000 LONGEVITY 1,425 0 1,425 1,925.00 .00 -500.00 135.1% 12030153 521100 HEALTH INSURANC 157,694 0 157,694 86,505.36 .00 71,188.64 54.9% 12030153 521200 DENTAL INSURANC 3,240 0 3,240 1,899.94 .00 1,340.06 58.6% 12030153 521300 LIFE INSURANCE 1,361 0 1,361 873.78 .00 487.22 64.2% 12030153 522000 SOCIAL SECURITY 49,857 0 49,857 41,247.31 .00 8,609.69 82.7% 12030153 523000 RETIREMENT CONT 84,060 0 84,060 67,148.11 .00 16,911.89 79.9% 12030153 525000 UNEMPLOYMENT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12030153 526000 WORKERS' COMPEN 1,193 0 1,193 1,204.32 .00 -11.32 100.9% 12030153 528001 DISABILITY INSU 6,644 0 6,644 4,368.60 .00 2,275.40 65.8% 12030153 532001 STAFF DEVELOPME 8,166 0 8,166 1,043.40 1,854.00 5,268.60 35.5% 12030153 532200 CONTRACTED SERV 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12030153 533004 MEDICAL SERVICE 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12030153 533010 LABOR NEGOTIATI 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12030153 534001 STATE FEE COMPU 1,584 0 1,584 396.00 .00 1,188.00 25.0% 12030153 534003 SOFTWARE MAINT/ 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12030153 543002 EQUIPMENT MAINT 23,662 0 23,662 20,694.46 6,645.54 -3,678.00 115.5% 12030153 544500 LEASE COPIER/PR 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12030153 552003 GENERAL LIABILI 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12030153 553000 COMMUNICATIONS 1,000 0 1,000 602.26 .00 397.74 60.2% 12030153 554000 ADVERTISING 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12030153 556000 TUITION 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12030153 558000 TRAVEL 2,000 0 2,000 .00 .00 2,000.00 .0% 12030153 561003 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2,200 0 2,200 430.12 .00 1,769.88 19.6% 12030153 561010 CLOTHING 3,500 0 3,500 172.00 .00 3,328.00 4.9% 12030153 561032 OTHER OPERATION 2,500 0 2,500 282.40 .00 2,217.60 11.3% 12030153 573401 ADMIN EQUIPMENT 14,150 0 14,150 5,010.85 .00 9,139.15 35.4% 12030153 573900 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .0% 12030153 581000 DUES AND FEES 550 0 550 .00 .00 550.00 .0% TOTAL DISPATCH CENTER 1,069,063 0 1,069,063 804,605.74 8,499.54 255,957.72 76.1% TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1,069,063 0 1,069,063 804,605.74 8,499.54 255,957.72 76.1% TOTAL EXPENSES 1,069,063 0 1,069,063 804,605.74 8,499.54 255,957.72 Report generated: 03/25/2026 10:35 Page 1 User: rhonda.morganti Program ID: glytdbud CITY OF ROCHESTER MARCH 2026 DISPATCH FINANCIALS FOR 2026 09 ORIGINAL TRANFRS/ REVISED AVAILABLE PCT APPROP ADJSTMTS BUDGET YTD EXPENDED ENC/REQ BUDGET USED GRAND TOTAL 1,069,063 0 1,069,063 804,605.74 8,499.54 255,957.72 76.1% ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Rhonda Morganti ** Report generated: 03/25/2026 10:35 Page 2 User: rhonda.morganti Program ID: glytdbud CITY OF ROCHESTER REVENUE MARCH 2026 FOR 2026 09 ACCOUNTS FOR: ORIGINAL ESTIM REV REVISED ACTUAL YTD REMAINING PCT 1000 GENERAL FUND ESTIM REV ADJSTMTS EST REV REVENUE REVENUE COLL 12011 POLICE CITY REVENUE 12011 400403 AMUSEMENT PERMITS 0 0 0 .00 .00 .0% 12011 400407 PISTOL PERMITS -830 0 -830 -530.00 -300.00 63.9% 12011 402110 INCOME FROM REPORT -4,708 0 -4,708 -3,220.70 -1,487.30 68.4% 12011 402111 OUTSIDE SECURITY S -280,000 0 -280,000 -202,727.05 -77,272.95 72.4% 12011 402112 OUTSIDE DUTY ADMIN 0 0 0 .00 .00 .0% 12011 402115 ALARM FEES -5,127 0 -5,127 -2,320.00 -2,807.00 45.3% 12011 402120 WRECKER SERVICE IN -1,650 0 -1,650 .00 -1,650.00 .0% 12011 402121 DOG SHELTER & TRAN -175 0 -175 -50.00 -125.00 28.6% 12011 402122 DOG FINES -8,130 0 -8,130 -5,955.00 -2,175.00 73.2% 12011 405201 COURT FINES -8,000 0 -8,000 -5,198.39 -2,801.61 65.0% 12011 405202 PARKING TICKETS -10,000 0 -10,000 -9,050.20 -949.80 90.5% 12011 405203 EXCESS ALARM PENAL -800 0 -800 .00 -800.00 .0% 12011 406201 MISCELLANEOUS REVE -2,650 0 -2,650 -94,793.39 92,143.39 3577.1% 12011 406203 POLICE DONATIONS 0 0 0 .00 .00 .0% 12011 406209 POLICE RESTITUTION -2,350 0 -2,350 -1,954.11 -395.89 83.2% 12011 406210 WITNESS FEES -75 0 -75 .00 -75.00 .0% 12011 406216 HOST TRAINING FEES 0 0 0 .00 .00 .0% 12011 406299 INSURANCE CLAIM RE -10,000 0 -10,000 .00 -10,000.00 .0% TOTAL POLICE CITY REVENUE -334,495 0 -334,495 -325,798.84 -8,696.16 97.4% 12012 POLICE STATE REVENUE 12012 402116 DRUG GRANT NEW HAM 0 0 0 .00 .00 .0% 12012 402117 HIGHWAY SAFETY GRA 0 0 0 .00 .00 .0% 12012 402118 PEDESTRIAN GRANT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .0% 12012 402119 DWI GRANT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .0% TOTAL POLICE STATE REVENUE 0 0 0 .00 .00 .0% 12013 POLICE FEDERAL REVENUE 12013 402113 LLEBG GRANT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .0% 12013 402114 JUSTICE DEPARTMENT 0 0 0 .00 .00 .0% TOTAL POLICE FEDERAL REVENUE 0 0 0 .00 .00 .0% Report generated: 03/25/2026 10:37 Page 1 User: rhonda.morganti Program ID: glytdbud CITY OF ROCHESTER REVENUE MARCH 2026 FOR 2026 09 ACCOUNTS FOR: ORIGINAL ESTIM REV REVISED ACTUAL YTD REMAINING PCT 1000 GENERAL FUND ESTIM REV ADJSTMTS EST REV REVENUE REVENUE COLL TOTAL GENERAL FUND -334,495 0 -334,495 -325,798.84 -8,696.16 97.4% TOTAL REVENUES -334,495 0 -334,495 -325,798.84 -8,696.16 Report generated: 03/25/2026 10:37 Page 2 User: rhonda.morganti Program ID: glytdbud CITY OF ROCHESTER REVENUE MARCH 2026 FOR 2026 09 ORIGINAL ESTIM REV REVISED ACTUAL YTD REMAINING PCT ESTIM REV ADJSTMTS EST REV REVENUE REVENUE COLL GRAND TOTAL -334,495 0 -334,495 -325,798.84 -8,696.16 97.4% ** END OF REPORT - Generated by Rhonda Morganti ** Report generated: 03/25/2026 10:37 Page 3 User: rhonda.morganti Program ID: glytdbud