Affordable Housing Trust Fund
Regular MeetingSalem, MA · April 7, 2020
Minutes
Affordable Housing Trust Fund Board
Approved Meeting Minutes
April 7, 2020
A meeting of the Salem Affordable Housing Trust Fund Board was held on Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at a
Remote Zoom meeting at 6:30 p.m.
Members present: Mayor Kim Driscoll, Councilor Ty Hapworth, Filipe Zamborlini, Councilor Patricia
Morsillo, Cynthia Nina-Soto, Rebecca Curran, Ben Anderson, Mickey Northcutt.
Vice Chair Mickey Northcutt called the meeting to order at 6:36 p.m.
1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. The Board votes to support the Board of the Council on Aging’s Community Preservation Act
(CPA) application for a rental program.
Ben Anderson makes a motion to write a letter to the Community Preservation Committee from the
Affordable Housing Trust Fund Board in support of the COA Boards CPA application and a letter
recommending that the CPA maximize resources to affordable housing, seconded by Cynthia Nina-Soto.
Motion carries by roll call vote unanimously.
2. NEW BUSINESS
A. Introductions. Mickey Northcutt welcomes the new Affordable Housing Trust Fund Board
members, Councillor Morsillo, Councillor Hapworth are Filipe Zamborlini. Ms. Chiancola notes
that the Board members all know the Councillors but suggests Mr. Zamborlini introduce himself.
Mr. Zamborlini has a few board members at housing meetings and other city meetings. He is a
public policy professional for over ten years, is formerly undocumented immigrant in the US he
came from Brazil in 2001 spent over half his life here. He became a citizen this past primary
election but before that he has experienced housing insecurity and knows how it feels to not have
access to social net support systems and have to figure it out on your own. Housing has always
been close to him. He is a public policy director at Rosie’s Place the first Women’s shelter in the
United States which serves women across the commonwealth including some in Salem. Housing
Affordability is an issue in his mind he is happy to be here. He lives across the street from the
Harbor Sweets Chocolate Factory.
Ms. Chiancola says there are seven members of the public attending and asks Vice Chair Northcutt
how he would like to handle public comments. Vice Chair Northcutt says they will hold public
comments at the end noting that it is not a long agenda and wants to make sure the members of
the public have a chance to hear the full discussion.
B. Office Elections. Ms. Chiancola says that the current officers could continue to serve this year but
there has to be a vote. The current officers are as such: Chair Mayor Driscoll, Vice Chair Mickey
Northcutt and the Treasurer was Grace Harrington-Napolitano, but she no longer serves on the
board so that seat is open. Mayor Driscoll and Mr. Northcutt both say they would be happy to
continue or if someone else wants those seats they are happy to step down if anyone is interested.
Cynthia Nina-Soto makes a motion to appoint Mayor Driscoll to serve as Chair, Mickey Northcutt
as Vice Chair and Filipe Zamborlini as Treasurer seconded by Ben Anderson. The motion is carried
by a unanimous vote.
C. Priorities for 2020. Ms. Chiancola put together a table of suggested priorities for the AHTF Board
to consider. The list of priorities are suggested strategies and says the Board members can also
add in their own strategies. Ms. Chiancola asks the Board members to identify up to two strategies
to focus on (not including the high priorities that are already being worked on). That will also help
her work plan in understanding what this Board wants to focus on. She goes through the list,
summarizing the table below. There are some priorities that are identified as high because they
are already being worked on so it is assumed that those will continue to be high priorities.
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION PRIORITY
Condo Currently, 49% of housing units in Salem are renter-occupied, and 51% are
owner-occupied. However, Salem’s housing stock is overwhelmingly old. Over
Conversion half (54%) of all homes were built before 1940. Older homes are vulnerable to
Ordinance conversion into condominiums, which reduces the city’s rental options. Since
June of 2015, 305 rental units1 have been converted into condominiums.
This is particularly concerning because the median income of renters is about
$37,000 and half of all renter households (4,465) are cost-burdened. If these
renters were to be displaced they would have very few options for relocation in
Salem.
A condo conversion ordinance could be developed to provide protection for
tenants facing displacement. A condo conversion ordinance does not limit a
landlord’s ability to convert their property into condos, but it does require
protections e.g. providing proper notice to the tenants. An MAPC case study of
various condo conversion ordinances can be found here:
http://www.mapc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Condominium-Conversion-
Ordinances.pdf
Opportunities Chapter 40R of the Massachusetts General Law encourages cities and towns
to zone for compact residential and mixed use development in “smart growth”
for a 40R locations by way of a 40R district.
District
A 40R district is a zoning overlay. A 40R is beneficial to a developer in that it
allows more homes than what would be allowed under the based zoning
through a site plan review process, rather than by special permit. A 40R district
is beneficial to the City in that it requires 20% of new units created to be
affordable. The City may also include design guidelines to guide the design of
new development in a 40R district. In addition, adoption of a 40R District
provides the City two financial incentives: the first is an upfront payment that
ranges from $10,000 - $600,000 depending on the number new units, the
second financial incentive is a set of payments in increments of $3,000 for
every unit built in excess of what the base zoning would have allowed.
1
The number of apartment units converted into condominiums is shown below. The year represents June 15 of the prior year to June 15 of the year
shown:
2016: 37
2017: 45
2018: 60
2019: 52
2020: 80
2021: thus far, 31
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION PRIORITY
More information about 40Rs can be found here:
https://www.mass.gov/service-details/chapter-40r
ADU Design A design book of templates and suggestions on how to incorporate ADUs into
the various housing designs found in Salem.
Template
For example, Santa Cruz County in California developed a design this booklet
that can be found here. Their design booklet provides an overview of the process
to create and ADU, links to financing opportunities, strategies to lower the
construction costs, and design templates with dimensional standards and
sample floor plans.
City-owned Staff and the AHTF Board have been reviewing publicly owned land to see if HIGH
there are opportunities to use public land for new housing. sites being
Building and considered include:
Land
Opportunities 77 Willson Street (the high school property), 5R Fredrick Street (a lot behind
Witchcraft Heights Elementary School) and land off Memorial Drive.
This work will continue throughout 2020.
ADU Loan Staff is currently working on setting up a loan program that homeowners will be HIGH
able to borrow from to build an ADU. In order to qualify for the loan, the
Program homeowner would need to restrict their home as affordable. The tenant’s
income will be set at 60% AMI and maximum rental amounts will be the fair
market rents established by HUD for households at 60% AMI.
ADU Tax The City Council is reviewing an Order to submit a special act to the legislature HIGH
to allow for the City to offer a property tax exemption for homeowners with
Incentive ADUs if they offer their ADU at an affordable rent. The exemption must be
applied for each year that the owner seeks to receive it, and the application
must be accompanied by a copy of the lease and proof that the tenant does
not earn more than the following per year.
Councillor Hapworth suggests two priorities. He notes the first is rough right now but in thinking through
the COVID-19 impact he has found in making calls to seniors that there are two categories seniors one set
that are doing well. That set doing well have Netflix and insta-cart but there is another set of seniors that
informed us they are running out of food, haven’t seen anyone in days and they do not know what to do.
He notes that every community will have to figure out the linkage between healthcare and housing. We
are seeing lots of inequities and these three weeks are laying bare the issues we have around housing
inequalities. Councillor Hapworth notes that this is really rough and very broad so he is not sure what it
would like and suggested it would need some brainstorming but wants to include the healthcare housing
linkage as a priority. The second priority for him is the condo conversion ordinance. He notes that the
people being impacted by coronavirus are hourly employees he would like to the board to think about
how to protect the rental stock or at least add additional rights for the tenants.
Mr. Zamborlini asks if this board has the capacity to address housing production. He explains that the
housing report card for Greater Boston gave Salem a zero score in 2019 for housing production. On the
condo conversion side housing production is important. If we are not building anything or supporting
organizations who can build we will be in this limbo situation perpetually possible where we try to come
up with good remedies such as the condo conversion ordinance but we would always be trying to come
up with remedies instead of treating the underlying problem.
Mr. Northcutt responds that Salem has a good ecosystem of building. He can speak to the North Shore
CDC’s efforts which have a strong pipeline of affordable housing projects in Salem. That includes two
buildings, the school redevelopments that are in permitting and others that are not public yet. At a high-
level production just takes so long. No matter how great the project is there is no such thing as a project
that gets conjured up and built the next year. Any project with the majority affordable units requires
public subsidy. The money that we have at the City level whether it is coming from CDBG, CPA, HOME
always acts as a token amount of a local match that allows the developer to apply for state and federal
financing which takes a long time. He is opportunistic about the outlook in the short term, even though
the first three stimulus bills are focused on people, when Congress starts talking about infrastructure
affordable housing will be on the list and the NSCDC has 100% affordable shovel ready projects in Salem.
The NSCDC is also converting 18 existing rental units into renovated affordable units. Plus, the Salem
Housing Authority is prioritizing opportunities in their portfolio. With just these four projects in the
pipeline, that is a lot it will take 5-6 years and that is a good thing. If any city gets too many new
construction projects that are all affordable at the same time they compete with each other. And he wants
to encourage people to support the pipeline of projects the Salem has. So a couple of years ago the AHTF
Board had a conversation noting we have that pipeline so what should they do, and decided to generate
policies that support affordable housing (noting the trust does not have much money) and decided to not
be as production focused because we have that pipeline. Policies such as Inclusionary Zoning and
Accessory Dwelling Units are low hanging fruit and will create some affordable units and when taken
together with the pipeline if we were to pass all the strategies on that list it would be the most
comprehensive set of affordable strategies set in the state.
Rebecca Curran recommends that 40Rs are a good thing to look at, in thinking about doing things quickly
without subsidy. It is streamlined mixed use development with design guidelines the result in affordable
units built by the private sector. It doesn’t change the zoning because it is an overlay so could be easier
to pass. She does not know too much about condo conversions so wants to look at that more to
understand the consequences of it. She agrees we should keep the things we are working on high but
wants to add 40R to the high priority list.
Cynthia Nina-Soto would like senior housing identified as a high priority or medium. She has heard a lot
of public comments during the Accessory Dwelling Unit conversation regarding the need for senior
housing. It could be something the Salem Housing Authority supports. She agrees 40R should also be
considered a priority and of course the COVID-relief efforts.
Councillor Morsillo would like to see a conversation around senior housing. She would like to see more
universal design in the new buildings that are being built. Everyone has a different idea in their mind of
what senior housing is she wants to know what people mean when they refer to senior housing. She asked
the developers on Highland Avenue if they are using universal design and they did not know what it is, so
education around that is needed and that is a good topic to start because it is discussed a lot. She does
not know enough about the 40R or condo conversion ordinances they sound good but is not familiar
enough to know how to prioritize them. She also notes the COVID relief efforts should be high.
Mr. Northcutt asks if there is a will of the City Council to take action and actually vote on the inclusionary
zoning and accessory dwelling unit ordinances or is the council holding off until they can meet in person?
That has a huge influence on how many priorities we can add to the list this year. Not knowing how long
that goes on and knowing they fill our agenda he wonders how much policy gets proposed in the short
run.
Mayor Driscoll responds that we filed the ADU with 8 Councilors supporting it so hopes it will get to the
finish line quickly. Inclusionary zoning may need additional time to digest, but both are not cutting-edge
proposals. They are in place in many other communities. The public hearing was continued to April 13th
but there is a lot of leg work even post-closing of the public hearing so hopefully if not on the April 13th
meeting then sometime soon after that. There was urgency around affordable housing before COVID-19,
it will only be deeper and harder post COVID and thinks there are definitely strategies here that could
help. We need to keep the gas pedal on the work we are doing and map out what else we can do because
we do not have the luxury to pause.
Ben Anderson says his two priorities are 1. The 40R district, it is comprehensive with the 20% of new
affordable units and the upfront payments to the city and an overlay district is achievable and number 2.
Is senior housing that warrants and needs a lot of study as well. That ties into city owned buildings. The
category under city owned buildings and land, we talked about land but not city buildings. There should
be further discussion related to that. He does not know the buildings available if there are any but that
would be good to look at. The ADU design template is good but should be combined with the tax incentive
and loan program as a bundle, to follow up with these other initiatives would be terrific for the city. The
COVID-19 relief is critical. His least priority is the condo conversion because that could be scary for
property owners.
Mayor Driscoll asks Filipe to elaborate on the housing production report card. Mr. Zamborlini explains
that Salem scored a zero on production but well on other metrics. Ms. Chiancola notes that report card
pulled census data to determine production levels; however, the City’s building permits have not been
captured by the census. Although there are still many other cities that have higher production levels than
Salem, the City should have been higher than what it was. In the past five years the City has permitted
(that is building permits issued) a little over 500 net gained units. She can share the chart of new units
with the board if they are interested.
Ms. Nina-Soto says she would like to see the chart.
Mr. Northcutt is on a lot of the COVID-19 calls on the affordable housing worlds response to COVID and
the aftermath. He says that he feels there is so much uncertainty with what kind of timeline we are talking
about and the economy. No one can say what the next year will look like. He is a huge fan of moving
forward and hopes the council will go ahead and act especially not knowing when things will be back to
normal, this could go on for quite a while. He recommends sending the Council a letter from this body
encouraging them to move forward with action to create those units but also free up the plate to work
on more policy initiatives. He would like to think about what will have the most effect given that there
will be a new realty and would like to see another layer or two of the federal response. Thus far they have
come up with fairly decent programs, while not comprehensive there is good stuff in there, and he
presumes that will continue. If the Council take action in April/May that would be fabulous and then we
can revisit. Ordering up priorities today is difficult because every month will feel like a year of new
knowledge and be able to have a better sense of the timeline of this stuff. He recommends adding the
disposition of all public property to the list, including buildings.
Mayor Driscoll responds that in terms of public land we are shaking all the trees. They way Salem is
developed there is not much that is not already used and there are not a lot of public buildings.
Mr. Northcutt says the SRA is overseeing the disposition of the crescent lot across from the train station
and has seen the four finalists who are proposing market rate proposals. In thinking about time, energy,
he wishes we had a chance as a board to discuss expectations for affordability there and suggestions
sending them a letter.
Mr. Zamborlini suggests that what Mickey is bringing up, is tangential policy work that is not so much
legislative, as our own act as a body. Another thing he recommends is taking out COVID response as a
criteria to consider at all, that is just a realty that we have to address. He also says that he agrees with
Councillor Hapworth in that we need to consider deeper ways to come up with strategies to address this
and that affordable housing for seniors is something to keep on the block as a priority. Could we choose
to include COVID, the current priorities we are working on and determine the other high medium and
lows at a subsequent meeting.
Tom Daniel responds to Mr. Northcutt, to clarify there was a range in concepts on what he affordable
housing component would be on the crescent property. The SRA has included affordability housing as
adventurous on the RFP there are a lot of competing goals. It is a thin project the cost for the adaptive
reuse is high the Chp. 91 designation of being on filled tided lands and the parking lot area are costly. The
crescent lot was added in to help offset the cost of renovating the court buildings. At this point the process
is so far along it would be a disservice to the overall objective to try to change some of the criteria we
already put out there for the teams to respond to but have encouraged for the teams to go above and
beyond the current affordably housing policy and they are aware of the draft inclusionary zoning
ordinance as well.
Mayor Driscoll builds off these comments noting the historic preservation benefits of the redevelopment.
The reason the two court buildings and the crescent lot were combined is the sheer cost of renovating
the court buildings far exceed the return on investment from anybody undertaking anything in there so
the goal is to attract investment that will have some level of affordability while also preserving these
important historic structures. Her hope in Salem that they can balance the competing interests and feels
they have been successful at getting win wins.
Councillor Hapworth suggests sending a letter to the City Council from the AHTF Board recommending
they act on the zoning amendments. He acknowledges there is a crisis but with affordable housing we
need to push forward with the easy stuff.
Filipe Zamborlini makes a motion to write a letter to the City Council from the Affordable Housing Trust
Fund Board to the City Council urging them to move forward with the inclusionary zoning amendment and
the accessory dwelling unit ordinance, seconded by Ben Anderson. Motion carries by roll call vote
unanimously.
Mr. Northcutt notes it doesn’t seem like there is consensus on the priorities so recommends continuing
the discussion to the next meeting.
3. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
A. Ben Anderson makes a motion to approve the March 3, 2020 Affordable Housing Trust Fund Board
meeting minutes, seconded by Rebecca Curran and the motion carries unanimously.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Danielle from 43 Bayview Avenue: Says she has spoken with a lot of seniors who were born and raised in
Salem, worked here but cannot afford their homes anymore and cannot find affordable housing, some
are not feeling comfortable living with younger people some are being told they are not qualified. She
suggests speaking with seniors. She asks about the status of the Memorial Drive lots.
Ms. Chiancola responds that the surveyor is taken longer than expected due to COVID-19. After the survey
there will need to be a feasibility study, before that starts, we will provide a follow up letter. Mayor Driscoll
responds that the Housing Authority is looking at an opportunity to create senior housing at Lee Fort
Terrace.
Nick Hamm 12 Larkin Lane: Explains that the land at memorial drive is being used as a park, many people
walk through there, there is a bmx bike area that has been up there for decades, lots of people view this
as a park and have used it as a park for many years. Another point is the land was previously created for
veteran housing and wonders why it is not going to be used for veteran housing.
Mayor Driscoll says nothing has been determined, we still need to determine if it is feasible to build there.
If it is, we can add veteran preferences. The thought was it would be affordable starter homes but again,
it is still an if and the type of homes and preferences.
Mr. Zamborlini notes that when we say affordable housing we are referring to all types of affordable
housing which does not discriminate against one kind of person. He appreciates that Nick brought up the
need for veteran housing and he will be brining that up again if we are able to move forward with
developing this land.
Cynthia Jerzalo 17 Bayview Avenue says that no one is saying the land is park land and wants the AHTF
Board to keep that in mind, she is concerned that other parkland will be taken.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion to adjourn by Mickey Northcutt, seconded by Councillor Morsillo—passes unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
Approved by the Affordable Housing Trust Fund Board on 5/5/2020
Know your rights under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L. c. 30A § 18-25 and City Ordinance § 2-2028 through
§ 2-2033.
Agenda
Affordable Housing Trust Fund Board
Approved Meeting Minutes
April 7, 2020
A meeting of the Salem Affordable Housing Trust Fund Board was held on Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at a
Remote Zoom meeting at 6:30 p.m.
Members present: Mayor Kim Driscoll, Councilor Ty Hapworth, Filipe Zamborlini, Councilor Patricia
Morsillo, Cynthia Nina-Soto, Rebecca Curran, Ben Anderson, Mickey Northcutt.
Vice Chair Mickey Northcutt called the meeting to order at 6:36 p.m.
1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. The Board votes to support the Board of the Council on Aging’s Community Preservation Act
(CPA) application for a rental program.
Ben Anderson makes a motion to write a letter to the Community Preservation Committee from the
Affordable Housing Trust Fund Board in support of the COA Boards CPA application and a letter
recommending that the CPA maximize resources to affordable housing, seconded by Cynthia Nina-Soto.
Motion carries by roll call vote unanimously.
2. NEW BUSINESS
A. Introductions. Mickey Northcutt welcomes the new Affordable Housing Trust Fund Board
members, Councillor Morsillo, Councillor Hapworth are Filipe Zamborlini. Ms. Chiancola notes
that the Board members all know the Councillors but suggests Mr. Zamborlini introduce himself.
Mr. Zamborlini has a few board members at housing meetings and other city meetings. He is a
public policy professional for over ten years, is formerly undocumented immigrant in the US he
came from Brazil in 2001 spent over half his life here. He became a citizen this past primary
election but before that he has experienced housing insecurity and knows how it feels to not have
access to social net support systems and have to figure it out on your own. Housing has always
been close to him. He is a public policy director at Rosie’s Place the first Women’s shelter in the
United States which serves women across the commonwealth including some in Salem. Housing
Affordability is an issue in his mind he is happy to be here. He lives across the street from the
Harbor Sweets Chocolate Factory.
Ms. Chiancola says there are seven members of the public attending and asks Vice Chair Northcutt
how he would like to handle public comments. Vice Chair Northcutt says they will hold public
comments at the end noting that it is not a long agenda and wants to make sure the members of
the public have a chance to hear the full discussion.
B. Office Elections. Ms. Chiancola says that the current officers could continue to serve this year but
there has to be a vote. The current officers are as such: Chair Mayor Driscoll, Vice Chair Mickey
Northcutt and the Treasurer was Grace Harrington-Napolitano, but she no longer serves on the
board so that seat is open. Mayor Driscoll and Mr. Northcutt both say they would be happy to
continue or if someone else wants those seats they are happy to step down if anyone is interested.
Cynthia Nina-Soto makes a motion to appoint Mayor Driscoll to serve as Chair, Mickey Northcutt
as Vice Chair and Filipe Zamborlini as Treasurer seconded by Ben Anderson. The motion is carried
by a unanimous vote.
C. Priorities for 2020. Ms. Chiancola put together a table of suggested priorities for the AHTF Board
to consider. The list of priorities are suggested strategies and says the Board members can also
add in their own strategies. Ms. Chiancola asks the Board members to identify up to two strategies
to focus on (not including the high priorities that are already being worked on). That will also help
her work plan in understanding what this Board wants to focus on. She goes through the list,
summarizing the table below. There are some priorities that are identified as high because they
are already being worked on so it is assumed that those will continue to be high priorities.
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION PRIORITY
Condo Currently, 49% of housing units in Salem are renter-occupied, and 51% are
owner-occupied. However, Salem’s housing stock is overwhelmingly old. Over
Conversion half (54%) of all homes were built before 1940. Older homes are vulnerable to
Ordinance conversion into condominiums, which reduces the city’s rental options. Since
June of 2015, 305 rental units1 have been converted into condominiums.
This is particularly concerning because the median income of renters is about
$37,000 and half of all renter households (4,465) are cost-burdened. If these
renters were to be displaced they would have very few options for relocation in
Salem.
A condo conversion ordinance could be developed to provide protection for
tenants facing displacement. A condo conversion ordinance does not limit a
landlord’s ability to convert their property into condos, but it does require
protections e.g. providing proper notice to the tenants. An MAPC case study of
various condo conversion ordinances can be found here:
http://www.mapc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Condominium-Conversion-
Ordinances.pdf
Opportunities Chapter 40R of the Massachusetts General Law encourages cities and towns
to zone for compact residential and mixed use development in “smart growth”
for a 40R locations by way of a 40R district.
District
A 40R district is a zoning overlay. A 40R is beneficial to a developer in that it
allows more homes than what would be allowed under the based zoning
through a site plan review process, rather than by special permit. A 40R district
is beneficial to the City in that it requires 20% of new units created to be
affordable. The City may also include design guidelines to guide the design of
new development in a 40R district. In addition, adoption of a 40R District
provides the City two financial incentives: the first is an upfront payment that
ranges from $10,000 - $600,000 depending on the number new units, the
second financial incentive is a set of payments in increments of $3,000 for
every unit built in excess of what the base zoning would have allowed.
1
The number of apartment units converted into condominiums is shown below. The year represents June 15 of the prior year to June 15 of the year
shown:
2016: 37
2017: 45
2018: 60
2019: 52
2020: 80
2021: thus far, 31
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION PRIORITY
More information about 40Rs can be found here:
https://www.mass.gov/service-details/chapter-40r
ADU Design A design book of templates and suggestions on how to incorporate ADUs into
the various housing designs found in Salem.
Template
For example, Santa Cruz County in California developed a design this booklet
that can be found here. Their design booklet provides an overview of the process
to create and ADU, links to financing opportunities, strategies to lower the
construction costs, and design templates with dimensional standards and
sample floor plans.
City-owned Staff and the AHTF Board have been reviewing publicly owned land to see if HIGH
there are opportunities to use public land for new housing. sites being
Building and considered include:
Land
Opportunities 77 Willson Street (the high school property), 5R Fredrick Street (a lot behind
Witchcraft Heights Elementary School) and land off Memorial Drive.
This work will continue throughout 2020.
ADU Loan Staff is currently working on setting up a loan program that homeowners will be HIGH
able to borrow from to build an ADU. In order to qualify for the loan, the
Program homeowner would need to restrict their home as affordable. The tenant’s
income will be set at 60% AMI and maximum rental amounts will be the fair
market rents established by HUD for households at 60% AMI.
ADU Tax The City Council is reviewing an Order to submit a special act to the legislature HIGH
to allow for the City to offer a property tax exemption for homeowners with
Incentive ADUs if they offer their ADU at an affordable rent. The exemption must be
applied for each year that the owner seeks to receive it, and the application
must be accompanied by a copy of the lease and proof that the tenant does
not earn more than the following per year.
Councillor Hapworth suggests two priorities. He notes the first is rough right now but in thinking through
the COVID-19 impact he has found in making calls to seniors that there are two categories seniors one set
that are doing well. That set doing well have Netflix and insta-cart but there is another set of seniors that
informed us they are running out of food, haven’t seen anyone in days and they do not know what to do.
He notes that every community will have to figure out the linkage between healthcare and housing. We
are seeing lots of inequities and these three weeks are laying bare the issues we have around housing
inequalities. Councillor Hapworth notes that this is really rough and very broad so he is not sure what it
would like and suggested it would need some brainstorming but wants to include the healthcare housing
linkage as a priority. The second priority for him is the condo conversion ordinance. He notes that the
people being impacted by coronavirus are hourly employees he would like to the board to think about
how to protect the rental stock or at least add additional rights for the tenants.
Mr. Zamborlini asks if this board has the capacity to address housing production. He explains that the
housing report card for Greater Boston gave Salem a zero score in 2019 for housing production. On the
condo conversion side housing production is important. If we are not building anything or supporting
organizations who can build we will be in this limbo situation perpetually possible where we try to come
up with good remedies such as the condo conversion ordinance but we would always be trying to come
up with remedies instead of treating the underlying problem.
Mr. Northcutt responds that Salem has a good ecosystem of building. He can speak to the North Shore
CDC’s efforts which have a strong pipeline of affordable housing projects in Salem. That includes two
buildings, the school redevelopments that are in permitting and others that are not public yet. At a high-
level production just takes so long. No matter how great the project is there is no such thing as a project
that gets conjured up and built the next year. Any project with the majority affordable units requires
public subsidy. The money that we have at the City level whether it is coming from CDBG, CPA, HOME
always acts as a token amount of a local match that allows the developer to apply for state and federal
financing which takes a long time. He is opportunistic about the outlook in the short term, even though
the first three stimulus bills are focused on people, when Congress starts talking about infrastructure
affordable housing will be on the list and the NSCDC has 100% affordable shovel ready projects in Salem.
The NSCDC is also converting 18 existing rental units into renovated affordable units. Plus, the Salem
Housing Authority is prioritizing opportunities in their portfolio. With just these four projects in the
pipeline, that is a lot it will take 5-6 years and that is a good thing. If any city gets too many new
construction projects that are all affordable at the same time they compete with each other. And he wants
to encourage people to support the pipeline of projects the Salem has. So a couple of years ago the AHTF
Board had a conversation noting we have that pipeline so what should they do, and decided to generate
policies that support affordable housing (noting the trust does not have much money) and decided to not
be as production focused because we have that pipeline. Policies such as Inclusionary Zoning and
Accessory Dwelling Units are low hanging fruit and will create some affordable units and when taken
together with the pipeline if we were to pass all the strategies on that list it would be the most
comprehensive set of affordable strategies set in the state.
Rebecca Curran recommends that 40Rs are a good thing to look at, in thinking about doing things quickly
without subsidy. It is streamlined mixed use development with design guidelines the result in affordable
units built by the private sector. It doesn’t change the zoning because it is an overlay so could be easier
to pass. She does not know too much about condo conversions so wants to look at that more to
understand the consequences of it. She agrees we should keep the things we are working on high but
wants to add 40R to the high priority list.
Cynthia Nina-Soto would like senior housing identified as a high priority or medium. She has heard a lot
of public comments during the Accessory Dwelling Unit conversation regarding the need for senior
housing. It could be something the Salem Housing Authority supports. She agrees 40R should also be
considered a priority and of course the COVID-relief efforts.
Councillor Morsillo would like to see a conversation around senior housing. She would like to see more
universal design in the new buildings that are being built. Everyone has a different idea in their mind of
what senior housing is she wants to know what people mean when they refer to senior housing. She asked
the developers on Highland Avenue if they are using universal design and they did not know what it is, so
education around that is needed and that is a good topic to start because it is discussed a lot. She does
not know enough about the 40R or condo conversion ordinances they sound good but is not familiar
enough to know how to prioritize them. She also notes the COVID relief efforts should be high.
Mr. Northcutt asks if there is a will of the City Council to take action and actually vote on the inclusionary
zoning and accessory dwelling unit ordinances or is the council holding off until they can meet in person?
That has a huge influence on how many priorities we can add to the list this year. Not knowing how long
that goes on and knowing they fill our agenda he wonders how much policy gets proposed in the short
run.
Mayor Driscoll responds that we filed the ADU with 8 Councilors supporting it so hopes it will get to the
finish line quickly. Inclusionary zoning may need additional time to digest, but both are not cutting-edge
proposals. They are in place in many other communities. The public hearing was continued to April 13th
but there is a lot of leg work even post-closing of the public hearing so hopefully if not on the April 13th
meeting then sometime soon after that. There was urgency around affordable housing before COVID-19,
it will only be deeper and harder post COVID and thinks there are definitely strategies here that could
help. We need to keep the gas pedal on the work we are doing and map out what else we can do because
we do not have the luxury to pause.
Ben Anderson says his two priorities are 1. The 40R district, it is comprehensive with the 20% of new
affordable units and the upfront payments to the city and an overlay district is achievable and number 2.
Is senior housing that warrants and needs a lot of study as well. That ties into city owned buildings. The
category under city owned buildings and land, we talked about land but not city buildings. There should
be further discussion related to that. He does not know the buildings available if there are any but that
would be good to look at. The ADU design template is good but should be combined with the tax incentive
and loan program as a bundle, to follow up with these other initiatives would be terrific for the city. The
COVID-19 relief is critical. His least priority is the condo conversion because that could be scary for
property owners.
Mayor Driscoll asks Filipe to elaborate on the housing production report card. Mr. Zamborlini explains
that Salem scored a zero on production but well on other metrics. Ms. Chiancola notes that report card
pulled census data to determine production levels; however, the City’s building permits have not been
captured by the census. Although there are still many other cities that have higher production levels than
Salem, the City should have been higher than what it was. In the past five years the City has permitted
(that is building permits issued) a little over 500 net gained units. She can share the chart of new units
with the board if they are interested.
Ms. Nina-Soto says she would like to see the chart.
Mr. Northcutt is on a lot of the COVID-19 calls on the affordable housing worlds response to COVID and
the aftermath. He says that he feels there is so much uncertainty with what kind of timeline we are talking
about and the economy. No one can say what the next year will look like. He is a huge fan of moving
forward and hopes the council will go ahead and act especially not knowing when things will be back to
normal, this could go on for quite a while. He recommends sending the Council a letter from this body
encouraging them to move forward with action to create those units but also free up the plate to work
on more policy initiatives. He would like to think about what will have the most effect given that there
will be a new realty and would like to see another layer or two of the federal response. Thus far they have
come up with fairly decent programs, while not comprehensive there is good stuff in there, and he
presumes that will continue. If the Council take action in April/May that would be fabulous and then we
can revisit. Ordering up priorities today is difficult because every month will feel like a year of new
knowledge and be able to have a better sense of the timeline of this stuff. He recommends adding the
disposition of all public property to the list, including buildings.
Mayor Driscoll responds that in terms of public land we are shaking all the trees. They way Salem is
developed there is not much that is not already used and there are not a lot of public buildings.
Mr. Northcutt says the SRA is overseeing the disposition of the crescent lot across from the train station
and has seen the four finalists who are proposing market rate proposals. In thinking about time, energy,
he wishes we had a chance as a board to discuss expectations for affordability there and suggestions
sending them a letter.
Mr. Zamborlini suggests that what Mickey is bringing up, is tangential policy work that is not so much
legislative, as our own act as a body. Another thing he recommends is taking out COVID response as a
criteria to consider at all, that is just a realty that we have to address. He also says that he agrees with
Councillor Hapworth in that we need to consider deeper ways to come up with strategies to address this
and that affordable housing for seniors is something to keep on the block as a priority. Could we choose
to include COVID, the current priorities we are working on and determine the other high medium and
lows at a subsequent meeting.
Tom Daniel responds to Mr. Northcutt, to clarify there was a range in concepts on what he affordable
housing component would be on the crescent property. The SRA has included affordability housing as
adventurous on the RFP there are a lot of competing goals. It is a thin project the cost for the adaptive
reuse is high the Chp. 91 designation of being on filled tided lands and the parking lot area are costly. The
crescent lot was added in to help offset the cost of renovating the court buildings. At this point the process
is so far along it would be a disservice to the overall objective to try to change some of the criteria we
already put out there for the teams to respond to but have encouraged for the teams to go above and
beyond the current affordably housing policy and they are aware of the draft inclusionary zoning
ordinance as well.
Mayor Driscoll builds off these comments noting the historic preservation benefits of the redevelopment.
The reason the two court buildings and the crescent lot were combined is the sheer cost of renovating
the court buildings far exceed the return on investment from anybody undertaking anything in there so
the goal is to attract investment that will have some level of affordability while also preserving these
important historic structures. Her hope in Salem that they can balance the competing interests and feels
they have been successful at getting win wins.
Councillor Hapworth suggests sending a letter to the City Council from the AHTF Board recommending
they act on the zoning amendments. He acknowledges there is a crisis but with affordable housing we
need to push forward with the easy stuff.
Filipe Zamborlini makes a motion to write a letter to the City Council from the Affordable Housing Trust
Fund Board to the City Council urging them to move forward with the inclusionary zoning amendment and
the accessory dwelling unit ordinance, seconded by Ben Anderson. Motion carries by roll call vote
unanimously.
Mr. Northcutt notes it doesn’t seem like there is consensus on the priorities so recommends continuing
the discussion to the next meeting.
3. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
A. Ben Anderson makes a motion to approve the March 3, 2020 Affordable Housing Trust Fund Board
meeting minutes, seconded by Rebecca Curran and the motion carries unanimously.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Danielle from 43 Bayview Avenue: Says she has spoken with a lot of seniors who were born and raised in
Salem, worked here but cannot afford their homes anymore and cannot find affordable housing, some
are not feeling comfortable living with younger people some are being told they are not qualified. She
suggests speaking with seniors. She asks about the status of the Memorial Drive lots.
Ms. Chiancola responds that the surveyor is taken longer than expected due to COVID-19. After the survey
there will need to be a feasibility study, before that starts, we will provide a follow up letter. Mayor Driscoll
responds that the Housing Authority is looking at an opportunity to create senior housing at Lee Fort
Terrace.
Nick Hamm 12 Larkin Lane: Explains that the land at memorial drive is being used as a park, many people
walk through there, there is a bmx bike area that has been up there for decades, lots of people view this
as a park and have used it as a park for many years. Another point is the land was previously created for
veteran housing and wonders why it is not going to be used for veteran housing.
Mayor Driscoll says nothing has been determined, we still need to determine if it is feasible to build there.
If it is, we can add veteran preferences. The thought was it would be affordable starter homes but again,
it is still an if and the type of homes and preferences.
Mr. Zamborlini notes that when we say affordable housing we are referring to all types of affordable
housing which does not discriminate against one kind of person. He appreciates that Nick brought up the
need for veteran housing and he will be brining that up again if we are able to move forward with
developing this land.
Cynthia Jerzalo 17 Bayview Avenue says that no one is saying the land is park land and wants the AHTF
Board to keep that in mind, she is concerned that other parkland will be taken.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion to adjourn by Mickey Northcutt, seconded by Councillor Morsillo—passes unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
Approved by the Affordable Housing Trust Fund Board on 5/5/2020
Know your rights under the Open Meeting Law M.G.L. c. 30A § 18-25 and City Ordinance § 2-2028 through
§ 2-2033.
Get email alerts for Salem
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.