Bicycling & Shared Path Advisory Committee
Regular MeetingSalem, MA · November 4, 2020
Minutes
Meeting Minutes
Salem Bicycling Advisory Committee
Wednesday, November 4, 2020 6:30 p.m.
Remote Meeting
Members Present: Eric Papetti (Chair), Josh Gillis, Jayne O’Leary, Michael Williamson,
Alex Maranto, Colleen Downie, Connor Ryan, Matt Caruso
Members Absent: John Wathne, Michael Jaros, Kylie Sullivan
Also Present: Tom Devine, Senior Planner
Call Meeting to Order
Papetti calls the meeting to order. Devine describes the remote meeting format and
procedure for providing public comment.
Public Comment
Papetti opens to the meeting to public comment and there are none at that time.
Staff Update
Devine provides the following updates to the Committee:
• The Willson Street quick-build protected bike lanes are complete and the City is
collecting speed data for a before and after comparison. There is spirited
discussion on social media providing an opportunity for the Committee to weight
in.
• For the Fort Ave. bike lanes, the City’s contractor is scheduled to install the zebra
armadillos and parking stops the week of November 9.
• The City is meeting on November 19 with MassDOT to review utility implications
of the 25% design for the Boston Street corridor reconstruction.
• Salem and Peabody received 285 responses to its Harmony Grove path online
survey and will use these results to inform the development of a preferred path
alignment for the Working Group’s review.
Review of North Street Design Concepts
Document reviewed: North Street, Toole Design (slide presentation), undated
Lydia Hausle of Toole Design Group presents an overview of the project. This includes
past studies, existing data, public input to date, and three design alternatives.
1
Joe Carrao of 143 North Street says he is opposed to removing parking because every
building needs it for residents and their guests. He favors option 2 which preserves the
most parking.
Williamson says all design options presented are a big improvement, while he also
understands the resident’s concern about parking. Hausle confirms that there will be
barriers at the chicanes.
Maranto asks whether the side streets are resident only. (Only Foster and a portion of
Franklin Street are.) Maranto asks if the roadway is anticipated to handle u-turns.
Hausle says people may already do u-turns because they prefer to park on one side
versus the other and this could increase with this project. Alex asks if the proposed new
crosswalks will be at signals (they will not).
Ryan asks if the crosswalks can be raised. Hausle states that the project does not
propose raised crosswalks and that if it did, there would need to be a discussion with
emergency services about the impact on their operations.
Papetti says that parking consolidation requires effective crosswalks and he hasn’t seen
any great new ones in Salem. The North Street crossings should be better and Toole
should be creative and come up a better design. He suggests using center refuges and
better lighting. He adds that parking gets full at the cemetery during funerals and some
handicapped parking spaces may be out of date. He thinks that another outreach blind
spot may be users of North Street who are not Salem residents.
Kat Tovat of 143 North Street advocates for maintaining parking. Her building has
twelve units and twelve parking spaces. She supports option 2 because it maintains the
most parking. She likes concept 3, with parking maintained on one side if it is her side,
but recognizes that people on the other side of the street might disagree. The King’s
Roast Beef parking lot sometimes overflows onto street parking. Moving the bus stop to
the front of her home would impact existing parking. The North and School Streets
intersection is a “death trap”. More buses are needed. The city should clean up trash, fix
sidewalks, and trim trees. Bike lanes are not as important as these problems. She
agrees that narrower lanes with chicanes will slow traffic.
Ward 6 Councilor Meg Riccardi says she is concerned about moving parking for
McGlew Park across the street. She wonders if there is a best practice for the
placement of chicanes. She is curious about the impact of bus stops on business
parking. She offers to help the City with outreach to businesses.
Review of Washington St./Mill St./Canal St. Intersection Improvements
Document reviewed: Mill & Washington Street Intersection – Short-term solutions to
close an important gap, Toole Design (slide presentation), undated
2
Hausle presents a concept to connect the Mayor Salvo Multiuse Path to the Washington
Street bike lanes.
Caruso asks what protects cyclists between the intersection and the path entrance in
the concept. Hausle shows a separated contraflow lane for this short segment. Caruso
asks about markings in the intersection for bike crossing. Hausle suggests that the
intersection could be marked to indicate that all crossings, including diagonal, are
welcome, but wants to be mindful of the amount of visual clutter.
Papetti states that it is important to give weight to the connection going west, since
going east is easier. He appreciates the city keeping it simple and maintaining the traffic
lanes, but he would like to see the city consider dropping a lane. He also suggests
considering a two-way bike lane to Derby Street along the west side of Washington
Street where there is ample space. And a parking protected lane on the other side
would be beneficial to.
Ryan describes his experience bicycling through the intersection. He finds the path exit
to be disturbing. Currently he rides on a portion of the sidewalk and navigates the
intersection. He says there is space on the path for a visual curve twenty feet before the
exit to direct riders properly.
Hausle describes how a two-stage queue box would function in the intersection and
asks whether the Committee supports implementing it. Caruso says that if the project is
not going to be more dramatic, then it is an appropriate. Papetti supports this, but
emphasizes that it should be done in a way that makes a good first impression, since
this would be Salem’s first two-stage queue box.
Discussion of Salem Woods/Highland Park Trails
O’Leary reports that there will be two volunteer workdays for a bridge in Salem Woods,
November 14 and 15. She will email information to Devine to share with the group.
Meeting Minutes – 9/2/2020
Williamson motions, Caruso seconds, and all vote in favor to approve the September 2,
2020 meeting minutes.
Adjourn
Caruso motions, Williamson seconds, and all vote in favor to adjourn and 8:34 p.m.
Approved by the Bicycling Advisory Committee on January 6, 2020.
3
Agenda
City of Salem
BICYCLING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
NOTICE OF MEETING
You are hereby notified that the Salem Bicycling Advisory Committee will meet on Wednesday,
November 4, 2020 at 6:30pm via remote participation.*
*This special meeting will be conducted via remote participation with instructions posted to
www.salem.com, in accordance with Chapter 40C of the Massachusetts General Laws and
Governor Baker’s Emergency Order dated March 12, 2020.
Important Announcement:
Pursuant to Governor Baker’s March 12, 2020 Order Suspending Certain Provisions of the
Open Meeting Law, G.L. c. 30A, §18, and the Governor’s March 15, 2020 Order imposing
strict limitation on the number of people that may gather in one place, this meeting of the City
of Salem Bicycling Advisory Committee will be conducted via remote participation to the
greatest extent possible. Specific information and the general guidelines for remote
participation by members of the public and/or parties with a right and/or requirement to
attend this meeting will be posted on the City of Salem website, at
https://www.salem.com/home/news/zoom-teleconferencing-tool .
No in-person attendance of members of the public will be permitted, but every
effort will be made to ensure that the public can adequately access the
proceedings in real time, via technological means. In the event that we are unable to
do so, despite best efforts, we will post on the City of Salem’s website an audio or video
recording, transcript, or other comprehensive record of proceedings as soon as possible after
the meeting. Individuals may participate remotely in the meeting in the following manner:
Remote Participation Instructions:
Public participation will be conducted via a remote participation platform called Zoom.
Members of the public and/or parties with a right and/or requirement to attend this meeting
can access the remote meeting through any one of the following ways:
• Follow this direct link or go to: https://zoom.us/ and enter meeting ID 816 8613
2222 when prompted.
• Participants can dial toll-free 877-853-5257 and enter meeting ID 816 8613
2222 when prompted.
The meeting will be opened early at 6:15 pm to allow members of the public to
test their audio.
During portions of the meeting in which public comment is permitted, members
of the public who have “raised their hand” in Zoom will be called on to offer
comment. In order to raise a hand, members of the public using the Zoom
computer or phone application may click the “Raise Hand” button; members of
the public dialing in may press “*9” to raise their hand to speak.
Thank you for your patience and understanding as we navigate this challenging situation for
our community and the world.
98 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 978-619-5685 salem.com
MEETING AGENDA
1. Call Meeting to Order
2. Public Comment
3. Staff Update
4. Discussion of Bicycling Initiatives & Infrastructure Projects
a. Review of North Street Design Concepts
b. Review of Washington St./Mill St./Canal St. Intersection Improvements
5. Discussion of Salem Woods/Highland Park Trails
6. Other Business
a. Discussion of Potential Bike Friendly City Designation
b. Meeting Minutes – 9/2/2020
7. Adjourn
Know your rights under the Open Meeting Law, Massachusetts General Law Chapter 30A Sections
18-25 and City Ordinance Sections 2-2028 through 2-2033
98 Washington Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 978-619-5685 salem.com
Get email alerts for Salem
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.