City Council
Regular MeetingSalem, MA · October 10, 2024
Minutes
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
A Regular Meeting of the City Council was held in-person on Thursday, October 10, 2024, at
7:00 P.M. for the purpose of transacting any and all business. Notice of this meeting was
posted on October 8, 2024, at 12:56 P.M. This meeting is being recorded and is live on
S.A.T.V. and Zoom unless technological issues interrupt the transmission.
Councillors absent were Councillor Harvey, Councillor Varela and Councillor Watson-Felt
Council President Hapworth presided.
Councillor Prosniewski moved to dispense with the reading of the record of the previous
meeting. It was so voted.
President Hapworth requested that everyone please rise to recite the Pledge of Allegiance.
Salem City Council Land Acknowledgment
The Salem City Council honors that this land is Naumkeag, or fishing place, where
generations of Naumkeag people from the Pawtucket band of the Massachusett Tribe lived
and passed through for centuries.
We acknowledge that this is unceded Indigenous land and also acknowledge the
Massachusett Tribe, who continue to honor and hold this land into the present.
Salem’s City Council is committed to having ongoing meaningful dialogue with the indigenous
peoples who have presence in Salem in order to dismantle the legacies of oppression and
inequities that persist today
Councillor Merkl requested and received suspension of the rules to allow Elizabeth Solemn to
speak to welcome back the Indian Deed.
There was no public testimony.
(#455) – NATIONAL GRID TO INSTALL 1 JO POLE ON MARGIN STREET
Held from the last meeting a hearing on the request from National Grid to install 1 Jointly
Owned Pole on Margin St. at the intersection of Summer St. and Margin Street.
National Grid withdrew the petition.
No one appeared in favor or opposed
Councillor Morsillo moved to close the Public Hearing. It was so voted.
2
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
(#456) - APPOINTMENTS TO THE FOOD POLICY COUNCIL
Held from the last meeting, the Mayor’s Appointments of the following to the Food Policy Council,
with a terms to expire on September 23, 2027 were confirmed by a roll call vote of 8 yeas, 0 nays
and 3 absent. Councillors Harvey, Varela and Watson-Felt were recorded as absent.
Shelmy Mendez 34 Willson St.
Celia Grant 8 Alvah Kittredge Pk, Roxbury
Councillor Prosniewski requested and received suspension of the rules to allow Shelmy Mendez to
address the Council. (Celia Grant was not present. Council informed of conflict)
(#457) – APPOINTMENT OF THOMAS PINEROS SHIELD TO THE AFFORDABLE TRUST
FUND BOARD
Held from the last meeting, the Mayor’s Appointment of Thomas Pineros Shields 7 Bristol St to the
Affordable Housing Trust Fund Board with a term to expire January 14, 2026 was confirmed by a
roll call vote of 8 yeas, 0 nays and 3 absent. Councillors Harvey, Varela and Watson-Felt were
recorded as absent.
Councillor Cohen requested and received suspension of the rules to allow Thomas Pineros Shields
to address the Council.
(#458) – REAPPOINTMENT OF JIM BOSTICK TO THE PUBLIC ART COMMISSION
Held from the last meeting, the Mayor’s Re-appointment of Jim Bostick to the Public Art Commission
September 24, 2026 was confirmed by a roll call vote of 8 yeas, 0 nays and 3 absent. Councillors
Harvey, Varela and Watson-Felt were recorded as absent.
Councillor Prosniewski requested and received suspension of the rules to allow Jim Bostick
to address the Council.
#476 – APPOINTMENT OF DONEECA THURSTON-CHAVEZ TO THE HOUSING
AUTHORITY BOARD
The Mayor’s Appointment of Doneeca Thurston-Chavez 12 Osborne St. #2 to the Housing
Authority Board, with a term to expire May 27, 2027 was held under the rules.
3
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
#477 – REAPPOINTMENTS OF THE FOLLOWING TO VARIOUS BOARDS
The Mayor’s Re-appointment of the following with terms set forth below were held under the
rules.
Term
Name Board/Commission Term Expiration
Length
Carly Dwyer Naik Public Art Commission 2 years 10/12/2026
Affordable Housing Trust Fund
Megan Boyle 2 years 10/26/2026
Board
#478 – REAPPOINT OF CHRISTOPHER CHIGAS AS A CONSTABLE
The Mayor’s Re-appointment of Christopher Chigas of 5 Tammie Lane, Peabody to serve as
a Constable with the term to expire October 3, 2027 was received and filed.
#479 – APPROPRIATION OF $49,616.80 FOR RETIREMENT BUYBACK – FIRE
DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEE
The following order submitted by the Mayor was adopted under suspension of the rules.
ORDERED: That the sum of Forty-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Sixteen Dollars and Eighty Cents
($49,616.80) be approved within the “Retirement Stabilization Fund-Vacation/Sick Leave Buyback”
account (83113-5146) to be expended for the contractual buyback(s) listed below in accordance
with the recommendation of His Honor the Mayor.
Name Department Amount
Salem Fire $49,616.80
Dean Larrabee
Department
TOTAL $49,616.80
#480 – DONATION OF EZ HAULER ENCLOSED CARGO TRAILER
The following order submitted by the Mayor was adopted.
ORDERED: To accept the donation from the Salem Police Superior Officers Association (SPSOA)
and Salem Police Patrol Officers Association (SPPOA) of a 2024 model, 7’ x 14’ EZ Hauler
Enclosed Cargo Trailer valued at $9,483.90 in accordance with the recommendation of His Honor
the Mayor.
4
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
#481 – RESOLUTION REGOGNIZING THE SERVICE OF JOHN BORIS
The following resolution submitted by the Mayor was adopted by a roll call vote of 8 yeas, 0 nays
and 3 absent. Councillors Harvey, Varela and Watson-Felt were recorded as absent.
Resolution: Recognizing the Service of John Boris
WHEREAS: On October 10, 2024, we pay tribute to John Boris, as he steps down from
official service to the City of Salem after a lifetime of dedication to the community.
WHEREAS: John Boris moved to Salem more than 65 years ago and committed his life to
supporting the community, both with formal and informal efforts. He often refers to his
approach to service as “grassroots” oriented. He is dedicated to helping in whatever ways he
can, and he is particularly focused on Salem’s needs around affordable housing,
homelessness, food insecurity, disability rights and autism.
WHEREAS: John survived a challenging start to life that ultimately influenced his
compassionate outlook and approach to serving the community. When he was still a
teenager, he quit high school and went into the military, where he served in France for two
years. He eventually returned to Massachusetts where he worked hard to finish high school
in his twenties. Next, he attended Bentley College, where he earned a Bachelor of Science
in Accounting.
WHEREAS: John’s official community service has included time as a member of the Salem
Housing Authority Board (including many years as Chair), the Affordable Housing Trust Fund
Board, and the Community Preservation Committee.
WHEREAS: John has been a compassionate resource for people seeking housing, has
personally paid for hundreds of people and families in crisis to stay in hotels temporarily, and
worked to find longer term housing for them as well.
WHEREAS: John has served on the board of Northeast Arc and has remained a very
committed volunteer through that organization, assisting community members who have
disabilities throughout the area. He and his wife, Anne, have donated hundreds of weighted
blankets to community members with autism throughout the Northshore.
WHEREAS: In 2019, John was honored with the American Red Cross Enduring Hero Award
for his invaluable support to the Salem Police Department for their annual ‘National Night Out’
event.
WHEREAS: John is well-known around the community as a resource to turn to and a solver
of monumental problems, as well as a deeply generous person.
5
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Mayor of the City of Salem and the Salem
City Council express our sincere appreciation and gratitude to John Boris for the dedication,
kindness and generosity he has shared throughout his lifetime as a community member of
Salem.
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That this Resolution be made a matter of record of
these proceedings, and that a suitable copy be presented to John Boris along with a copy of
the City Seal on behalf of the Mayor, the City Council, and the residents of Salem.
#482 – NAMING OF A VETERANS SQUARE – SOBOCZINSKI SQUARE
The following order introduced by Councillor Jerzylo was adopted.
ORDERED: That the Salem City Council officially designate the corner of Daniels Street and
Daniels Street Court as Soboczinski Square in honor of Private First Class William “Willie”
Peter Soboczinski who was killed in action on November 9, 1944 during the battle for Metz,
France.
And Be It Further Ordered: That the Veteran’s Agent working in conjunction with the Police
Traffic Division erect a suitable sign at this location.
#483 – TO DISCUSS ADOPTING THE HERO ACT – MGL CH. 59, CLAUSE 22I AND 22J
The following order introduced by Councillor Prosniewski was adopted.
ORDERED: That the Committee on Government Services co-posted with the Committee of
the Whole meet to review the letter submitted by the Salem Veterans Council to discuss
adopting the Mass General Law relative to the HERO Act – MGL Chapter 59, Section 5,
Clause 22I and 22J
#484 – (#461) - RESOLUTION AND TAX INCREMENT EXEMPTION AGREEMENT FOR
38 NORMAN QOZB, LLC
Councillor Merkl offered the following report for the Committee on Administration and Finance
co-posted with the Committee of the Whole. It was voted to accept the report and adopt the
recommendation.
The Committee on Administration and Finance co-posted with the Committee of the Whole to
whom it was referred the matter of Resolution and Tax Increment Exemption Agreement for
38 Norman QOZB, LLC, has considered said matter and would recommend adoption by roll
call vote.
6
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
The Resolution and Tax Increment Exemption Agreement for 38 Norman QOZB, LLC was adopted
by a roll call vote of 8 yeas, 0 nays and 3 absent. Councillors Harvey, Varela and Watson-Felt were
recorded as absent.
Councillor Merkl stated this was a 10% exemption for 5 years. It is a mixed use building with
commercial on the first floor and 21 units above. Two units are deemed affordable. At first
they were going to be rental units, but it did not work out financially to be rentals so they
moved to be home ownership. Perspective owners will benefit from the exemption. But the
developers will be able to get HDIP incentives. This passed in committee 5 in favor none
opposed.
Councillor Cohen stated it is unfortunate that there the Home Rule Petition for condo
conversion did not get adopted at the State level. It is harder for middle class and below to
purchase a home.
#485 – (#467) – GRANTING CERTAIN LICENSES
Councillor Morsillo offered the following report for the Committee on Ordinances, Licenses
and Legal Affairs. It was voted to accept the report and adopt the recommendation.
The Committee on Ordinances, Licenses and Legal Affairs to whom it was referred the matter
of Granting of Certain Licenses – Secondhand Valuables, Game Zone has considered said
matter and would recommend that the license be granted.
#486 – ELECTION ORDER FOR THE STATE ELECTION (PRESIDENTIAL) – NOVEMBER
5, 2024
The following order submitted by the City Clerk, Ilene Simons, was adopted by a roll call vote of 8
yeas, 0 nays and 3 absent. Councillors Harvey, Varela and Watson-Felt were recorded as absent.
ORDERED: That the meetings of the qualified voters of the City of Salem be held in the
several voting precincts in the City at the polling places designated hereinafter on TUESDAY,
THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024, from 7:00 A.M. TO 8:00 P.M. for the following
purpose:
ORDENA: Que las reuniones de los votantes calificados de la Ciudad de Salem se lleven a
cabo en los distintos precintos de votación de la Ciudad en los lugares de votación
designados a continuación el MARTES QUINTO DÍA DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2024, de 7:00
A.M. A LAS 8:00 P.M. con el siguiente fin:
To cast their votes in the State Election for the candidates for the following offices:
Emitir su voto en las Elecciones Estatales por los candidatos a los siguientes cargos:
7
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
ELECTORS OF PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT FOR THESE UNITED STATES
ELECTORES DE PRESIDENTE Y VICE PRESIDENTE POR ESTOS ESTADOS UNIDOS
SENATOR IN CONGRESS. FOR THIS COMMONWEALTH
SENADOR EN EL CONGRESO POR ESTA MANCOMUNIDAD
REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT
REPRESENTATNTE EN EL CONGRESO POR DISTRITO SEXTO
COUNCILLOR FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT
CONCEJAL POR DISTRITO QUINTO
SENATOR IN GENERAL COURT FOR THE SECOND ESSEX DISTRICT
SENADOR DE LA LEGISLATURA ESTATAL POR DISTRITO SEGUNDO DE ESSEX
REPRESENTATIVE IN GENERAL COURT FOR THE SEVENTH ESSEX DISTRICT
REPRESENTANTE DE LA LEGISLATURA ESTATAL POR DISTRITO SEPTIMO DE ESSEX
CLERK OF COURTS FOR ESSEX COUNTY
SECRETARIO DE LAS CORTES POR CONDADO DE ESSEX
REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR ESSEX SOUTHERN DISTRICT
REGISTRADOR DE ESCRITURAS PUBLICAS POR DISTRITO DE ESSEX SOUTHERN
QUESTION 1: Law Proposed by Initiative Petition
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or
the House of Representatives before May 1, 2024?
SUMMARY
This proposed law would specify that the State auditor has the authority to audit the
legislature.
A YES VOTE would specify that the State auditor has the authority to audit the legislature.
A NO VOTE would make no change in the law relative to the State Auditor’s authority.
PREGUNTA 1 Ley propuesta por petición de iniciativa
¿Aprueba la ley resumida a continuación, sobre la cual el Senado o la Cámara de
Representantes no votaron antes del 1 de mayo de 2024?
RESUMEN
Esta ley propuesta especificaría que el auditor estatal tiene la autoridad para auditar la
Legislatura.
UN VOTO DE “SÍ” especificaría que el auditor estatal tiene la autoridad para auditar la
Legislatura.
UN VOTO DE “NO” no cambiaría la ley relativa a la autoridad del auditor estatal.
8
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
QUESTION 2: LAW PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or
the House of Representatives before May 1, 2024?
SUMMARY
This proposed law would eliminate the requirement that a student pass the Massachusetts
Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) tests (or other statewide or district-wide
assessments) in mathematics, science and technology, and English in order to receive a high
school diploma. Instead, in order for a student to receive a high school diploma, the proposed
law would require the student to complete coursework certified by the student’s district as
demonstrating mastery of the competencies contained in the state academic standards in
mathematics, science and technology, and English, as well as any additional areas
determined by the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
A YES VOTE would eliminate the requirement that students pass the Massachusetts
Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) in order to graduate high school but still require
students to complete coursework that meets state standards.
A NO VOTE would make no change in the law relative to the requirement that a student pass
the MCAS in order to graduate high school.
PREGUNTA 2 Ley propuesta por petición de iniciativa
¿Aprueba la ley resumida a continuación, sobre la cual el Senado o la Cámara de
Representantes no votaron antes del 1 de mayo de 2024?
RESUMEN
Esta ley propuesta eliminaría el requisito de que un estudiante apruebe las pruebas del
Sistema de Evaluación Integral de Massachusetts (MCAS) (u otras evaluaciones estatales o
distritales) en Matemáticas, Ciencias y tecnología e Inglés para recibir un diploma de escuela
secundaria. En cambio, para que un estudiante reciba un diploma de escuela secundaria, la
ley propuesta exigiría que el estudiante complete cursos certificados por el distrito del
estudiante, que demuestren el dominio de las competencias contenidas en los estándares
académicos estatales en Matemáticas, Ciencias y tecnología e Inglés, así como en cualquier
área adicional determinada por la Junta de Educación Primaria y Secundaria.
UN VOTO DE “SÍ” eliminaría el requisito de que los estudiantes aprueben el Sistema de
Evaluación Integral de Massachusetts (MCAS) para graduarse de la escuela secundaria,
pero aún requeriría que los estudiantes completen cursos que cumplan con los estándares
estatales.
UN VOTO DE “NO” no cambiaría nada en la ley relativa al requisito de que un estudiante
apruebe el MCAS para graduarse de la escuela secundaria.
9
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
QUESTION 3: LAW PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or
the House of Representatives before May 1, 2024?
SUMMARY
The proposed law would provide Transportation Network Drivers (“Drivers”) with the right to
form unions (“Driver Organizations”) to collectively bargain with Transportation Network
Companies (“Companies”)-which are companies that use a digital network to connect riders
to drivers for pre-arranged transportation-to create negotiated recommendations concerning
wages, benefits and terms and conditions of work. Drivers would not be required to engage in
any union activities. Companies would be allowed to form multi-Company associations to
represent them when negotiating with Driver Organizations. The state would supervise the
labor activities permitted by the proposed law and would have responsibility for approving or
disapproving the negotiated recommendations. The proposed law would define certain
activities by a Company or a Driver Organization to be unfair work practices. The proposed
law would establish a hearing process for the state Employment Relations Board (“Board”) to
follow when a Company or Driver Organization is charged with an unfair work practice. The
proposed law would permit the Board to take action, including awarding compensation to
adversely affected Drivers, if it found that an unfair work practice had been committed. The
proposed law would provide for an appeal of a Board decision to the state Appeals Court.
This proposed law also would establish a procedure for determining which Drivers are Active
Drivers, meaning that they completed more than the median number of rides in the previous
six months. The proposed law would establish procedures for the Board to determine that a
Driver Organization has signed authorizations from at least five percent of Active Drivers,
entitling the Driver Organization to a list of Active Drivers; to designate a Driver Organization
as the exclusive bargaining representative for all Drivers based on signed authorizations from
at least twenty-five percent of Active Drivers; to resolve disputes over exclusive bargaining
status, including through elections; and to decertify a Driver Organization from exclusive
bargaining status. A Driver Organization that has been designated the exclusive bargaining
representative would have the exclusive right to represent the Drivers and to receive
voluntary membership dues deductions. Once the Board determined that a Driver
Organization was the exclusive bargaining representative for all Drivers, the Companies
would be required to bargain with that Driver Organization concerning wages, benefits and
terms and conditions of work. Once the Driver Organization and Companies reached
agreement on wages, benefits, and the terms and conditions of work, that agreement would
be voted upon by all Drivers who has completed at least 100 trips the previous quarter. If
approved by a majority of votes cast, the recommendations would be submitted to the state
Secretary of Labor for approval and if approved, would be effective for three years. The
proposed law would establish procedures for the mediation and arbitration if the Driver
Organization and Companies failed to reach agreement within a certain period of time. An
arbitrator would consider factors set forth in the proposed law, including whether the wages of
Drivers would be enough so that Drivers would not need to rely upon any public benefits. The
proposed law also sets out procedures for the Secretary of Labor’s review and approval of
recommendations negotiated by a Driver Organization and the
10
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
Companies and for judicial review of the Secretary’s decision. The proposed law states that
neither its provisions, an agreement nor a determination by the Secretary would be able to
lessen labor standards established by other laws. If there were any conflict between the
proposed law and existing Massachusetts labor relations law, the proposed law would
prevail. The Board would make rules and regulations as appropriate to effectuate the
proposed law. The proposed law states that, if any of its parts were declared invalid, the other
parts would stay in effect.
A YES VOTE would provide transportation network drivers the option to form unions to
collectively bargain with transportation network companies regarding wages, benefits, and
terms and conditions of work
A NO VOTE would make no change in the law relative to the ability of transportation network
drivers to form unions.
PREGUNTA 3 Ley propuesta por petición de iniciativa
¿Aprueba la ley resumida a continuación, sobre la cual el Senado o la Cámara de
Representantes no votaron antes del 1 de mayo de 2024?
RESUMEN
La ley propuesta otorgaría a los conductores de redes de transporte (“conductores”) el
derecho a formar sindicatos (“organizaciones de conductores”) para negociar colectivamente
con las empresas de redes de transporte (“empresas”), que son empresas que utilizan una
red digital que conecta a los pasajeros con los conductores para un transporte
preestablecido, a fin de crear recomendaciones negociadas sobre salarios, beneficios y
términos y condiciones de trabajo. Los conductores no estarían obligados a participar en
ninguna actividad sindical. Las empresas podrían formar asociaciones de varias empresas
para que las representen cuando negocien con las organizaciones de conductores. El
Estado supervisaría las actividades laborales permitidas por la ley propuesta y tendría la
responsabilidad de aprobar o desaprobar las recomendaciones negociadas.
La ley propuesta definiría ciertas actividades de una empresa o una organización de
conductores como prácticas laborales injustas. La ley propuesta establecería un proceso de
audiencia que la Junta de Relaciones Laborales del estado (“Junta”) seguiría cuando una
empresa u organización de conductores sea acusada de una práctica laboral injusta. La ley
propuesta permitiría a la Junta tomar medidas, incluida la concesión de una compensación a
los conductores afectados negativamente, si determina que se ha cometido una práctica
laboral injusta. La ley propuesta prevería una apelación de una decisión de la
Junta ante la Corte de Apelaciones del Estado.
Esta ley propuesta también establecería un procedimiento para determinar qué conductores
son con- ductores activos, lo que significa que completaron más de la cantidad media de
viajes en los seis meses anteriores. La ley propuesta establecería procedimientos para que
la Junta determine que una Organización de Conductores ha firmado autorizaciones de al
menos el 5 % de los conductores activos, lo que le da derecho a la
Organización de Conductores a una lista de conductores activos; para designar una
Organización de Conductores como representante exclusivo de negociación para todos los
11
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
conductores con base en autorizaciones firmadas de al menos el 25 % de los conductores
activos; para resolver disputas sobre el estatus de negociación exclusiva, incluso a través de
elecciones; y para descertificar a una Organización de Conductores del estatus de
negociación exclusiva. Una Organización de Conductores que haya sido designada como
representante exclusivo de negociación tendría el derecho exclusivo de representar a los
conductores y recibir deducciones voluntarias de las cuotas de membresía.
Una vez que la Junta determine que una Organización de Conductores es el representante
exclusivo de negociación para todos los conductores, las empresas deberán negociar con
esa Organización de Conductores sobre salarios, beneficios y términos y condiciones de
trabajo. Una vez que la Organización de Conductores y las empresas lleguen a un acuerdo
sobre salarios, beneficios y términos y condiciones de trabajo, ese acuerdo se votará por
todos los conductores que hayan completado al menos 100 viajes el trimestre anterior. Si se
aprueban por la mayoría de los votos emitidos, las recomendaciones se presentarán al
secretario de trabajo del Estado para su aprobación y, de aprobarse, entrarán en efecto
durante tres años. La ley propuesta establecería procedimientos para la mediación y el
arbitraje si la Organización de Conductores y las empresas no llegan a un acuerdo en el
transcurso de un período determinado. Un árbitro consideraría los factores establecidos en la
ley propuesta, incluso si los salarios de los conductores serían suficientes para que no
tuvieran que depender de beneficios públicos. La ley propuesta también establece
procedimientos para la revisión y aprobación por parte del secretario de trabajo de las
recomendaciones negociadas por una Organización de Conductores y las empresas, y para
la revisión judicial de la decisión del secretario.
La ley propuesta establece que ni sus disposiciones, ni un acuerdo ni una determinación del
secretario podrían reducir las normas laborales establecidas por otras leyes. Si hubiera algún
conflicto entre la ley propuesta y la ley de relaciones laborales vigente en Massachusetts,
prevalecería la ley propuesta.
La Junta elaboraría normas y reglamentos según fuera necesario para hacer efectiva la ley
propuesta.
La ley propuesta establece que, si alguna de sus partes se declarara no válida, las otras
partes permanecerían en efecto.
UN VOTO DE “SÍ” brindaría a los conductores de redes de transporte la opción de formar
sindicatos para negociar colectivamente con las empresas de redes de transporte sobre
salarios, beneficios
y términos y condiciones de trabajo.
UN VOTO DE “NO” no cambiaría nada en la ley relativa a la capacidad de los conductores
de redes de transporte para formar sindicatos.
QUESTION 4: LAW PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or
the House of Representatives before May 1, 2024?
12
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
SUMMARY
This proposed law would allow persons aged 21 and older to grow, possess, and use certain
natural psychedelic substances in certain circumstances. The psychedelic substances
allowed would be two substances found in mushrooms (psilocybin and psilocyn) and three
substances found in plants (dimethyltryptamine, mescaline, and ibogaine). These substances
could be purchased at an approved location for use under the supervision of a licensed
facilitator. This proposed law would otherwise prohibit any retail sale of natural psychedelic
substances. This proposed law would also provide for the regulation and taxation of these
psychedelic substances. This proposed law would license and regulate facilities offering
supervised use of these psychedelic substances and provide for the taxation of proceeds
from those facilities’ sales of psychedelic substances. It would also allow persons aged 21
and older to grow these psychedelic substances in a 12-foot by 12-foot area at their home
and use these psychedelic substances at their home. This proposed law would authorize
persons aged 21 or older to possess up to one gram of psilocybin, one gram of psilocyn, one
gram of dimethyltryptamine, 18 grams of mescaline, and 30 grams of ibogaine (“personal use
amount”), in addition to whatever they might grow at their home, and to give away up to the
personal use amount to a person aged 21 or over. This proposed law would create a Natural
Psychedelic Substances Commission of five members appointed by the Governor, Attorney
General, and Treasurer which would administer the law governing the use and distribution of
these psychedelic substances. The Commission would adopt regulations governing licensing
qualifications, security, recordkeeping, education and training, health and safety
requirements, testing, and age verification. This proposed law would also create a Natural
Psychedelic Substances Advisory Board of 20 members appointed by the Governor, Attorney
General, and Treasurer which would study and make recommendations to the Commission
on the regulation and taxation of these psychedelic substances. This proposed law would
allow cities and towns to reasonably restrict the time, place, and manner of the operation of
licensed facilities offering psychedelic substances, but cities and towns could not ban those
facilities or their provision of these substances. The proceeds of sales of psychedelic
substances at licensed facilities would be subject to the state sales tax and an additional
excise tax of 15 percent. In addition, a city or town could impose a separate tax of up to two
percent. Revenue received from the additional state excise tax, license application fees, and
civil penalties for violations of this proposed law would be deposited in a Natural Psychedelic
Substances Regulation Fund and would be used, subject to appropriation, for administration
of this proposed law. Using the psychedelic substances as permitted by this proposed law
could not be a basis to deny a person medical care or public assistance, impose discipline by
a professional licensing board, or enter adverse orders in child custody cases absent clear
and convincing evidence that the activities created an unreasonable danger to the safety of a
minor child. This proposed law would not affect existing laws regarding the operation of motor
vehicles while under the influence, or the ability of employers to enforce workplace policies
restricting the consumption of these psychedelic substances by employees. This proposed
law would allow property owners to prohibit the use, display, growing, processing, or sale of
these psychedelic substances on their premises. State and local governments could continue
to restrict the possession and use of these psychedelic substances in public buildings or at
schools. This proposed law would take effect on December 15, 2024.
13
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
A YES VOTE would allow persons over age 21 to use certain natural psychedelic substances
under licensed supervision and to grow and possess limited quantities of those substances in
their home and would create a commission to regulate those substances.
A NO VOTE would make no change in the law regarding natural psychedelic substances.
PREGUNTA 4 Ley propuesta por petición de iniciativa
¿Aprueba la ley resumida a continuación, sobre la cual el Senado o la Cámara de
Representantes no votaron antes del 1 de mayo de 2024?
RESUMEN
La ley propuesta permitiría que las personas mayores de 21 años cultiven, posean y
consuman ciertas sustancias psicodélicas naturales en determinadas circunstancias. Las
sustancias psicodélicas permitidas serían dos sustancias que se encuentran en hongos
(psilocibina y psilocina) y tres sustancias que se encuentran en plan- tas (dimetiltriptamina,
mescalina e ibogaína). Estas sustancias se podían adquirir en un lugar aprobado para su
consumo bajo la supervisión de un facilitador con licencia. A menos que se indique lo
contrario, esta ley propuesta prohibiría toda venta minorista de sustancias psicodélicas
naturales. La ley propuesta también establecería la regulación de estas sustancias
psicodélicas y la aplicación de impuestos a estas.
La ley propuesta otorgaría licencias y regularía los establecimientos que ofrecen el consumo
supervisado de estas sustancias psicodélicas, y establecería la aplicación de impuestos a
dichos establecimientos sobre las ganancias obtenidas de las ventas de sustancias
psicodélicas. También permitiría que personas mayores de 21 años cultiven dichas
sustancias psicodélicas en un área de 12 pies por 12 pies en sus casas, y consuman dichas
sustancias psicodélicas en su casa. La ley propuesta autorizaría a personas mayores de 21
años a poseer hasta un gramo de psilocibina, un gramo de psilocina, un gramo de
dimetiltriptamina, 18 gramos de mescalina y 30 gramos de ibogaína (“cantidad para consumo
personal”), además de lo que sea que cultiven en sus casas, y a regalar a una persona
mayor de 21 años una cantidad de hasta la cantidad para consumo personal.
La ley propuesta crearía una Comisión de Sustancias Psicodélicas Naturales conformada
por cinco miembros designados por el gobernador, el fiscal general y el tesorero, que
administraría la ley que rige el consumo y la distribución de estas sustancias psicodélicas. La
Comisión adoptaría reglamentaciones que rijan las calificaciones para la obtención de
licencias, la seguridad, el mantenimiento de registros, la educación y capacitación, los
requisitos de salud y seguridad, las pruebas y la verificación de la edad. La ley propuesta
también crearía una Junta de Asesoramiento sobre Sustancias Psicodélicas Naturales
conformada por 20 miembros designados por el gobernador, el fiscal general y el tesorero,
que estudiaría y haría recomendaciones a la Comisión sobre la regulación y la aplicación de
impuestos sobre estas sustancias psicodélicas.
La ley propuesta permitiría que ciudades y pueblos limiten de manera razonable el momento,
el lugar y la manera de operar los establecimientos con licencia que ofrecen sustancias
psicodélicas, pero las ciudades y los pueblos no podrían prohibir dichos establecimientos ni
que estos proporcionen dichas sustancias.
14
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
Las ganancias obtenidas de la venta de sustancias psicodélicas en centros con licencia
quedarían sujetas al impuesto del estado sobre las venta y a un impuesto adicional sobre
consumos específicos del 15 %. Además, una ciudad o municipalidad podría aplicar un
impuesto por separado de hasta un 2 %. Las ganancias obtenidas del impuesto adicional
sobre consumos específicos, las tarifas de solicitud de licencia y las multas civiles por
incumplimiento de la ley propuesta se depositarían en un Fondo de Regulación de
Sustancias Psicodélicas Naturales y se usarían para la administración de esta ley propuesta,
sujeto a apropiación.
El consumo de sustancias psicodélicas según lo permite esta ley propuesta no podría ser
motivo para negar atención médica o asistencia pública a una persona, imponer una acción
disciplinaria por parte de una junta de licencias profesionales ni emitir órdenes judiciales
perjudiciales en casos de tenencia de niños, ante ausencia de evidencia clara y convincente
de que las actividades creen un peligro inaceptable para la seguridad de un niño menor de
edad.
La ley propuesta no afectaría las leyes existentes sobre la operación de vehículos
motorizados bajo los efectos de estas sustancias ni la capacidad de los empleadores de
imponer políticas en el lugar de trabajo que limiten el consumo de estas sustancias
psicodélicas por parte de los empleados. La ley propuesta permitiría que los propietarios
prohíban el consumo, la exhibición, el cultivo, el procesamiento o la venta de estas
sustancias psicodélicas en sus instalaciones. El Gobierno estatal y el Gobierno local podrían
seguir limitando la posesión y el consumo de estas sustancias psicodélicas en edificios
públicos o en escuelas.
La ley propuesta entraría en vigor el 15 de diciembre de 2024.
UN VOTO DE “SÍ” permitiría que las personas mayores de 21 años consuman ciertas
sustancias psicodéli- cas naturales bajo supervisión de una persona con licencia y a cultivas
y poseer cantidades limitadas de dichas sustancias en su casa, y crearía una comisión que
regule dichas sustancias.
UN VOTO DE “NO” no realizaría cambios en la ley sobre sustancias psicodélicas naturales.
QUESTION 5: LAW PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or
the House of Representatives before May 1, 2024?
SUMMARY
The proposed law would gradually increase the minimum hourly wage an employer must pay
a tipped worker, over the course of five years, on the following schedule:
• To 64% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2025;
• To 73% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2026;
• To 82% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2027;
• To 91% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2028; and
15
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
• To 100% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2029
The proposed law would require employers to continue to pay tipped workers the difference
between the state minimum wage and the total amount a tipped worker receives in hourly
wages plus tips through the end of 2028. The proposed law would also permit employers to
calculate this difference over the entire weekly or bi-weekly payroll period. The requirement to
pay this difference would cease when the required hourly wage for tipped workers would
become 100% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2029.
Under the proposed law, if an employer pays its workers an hourly wage that is at least the
state minimum wage, the employer would be permitted to administer a “tip pool” that
combines all the tips given by customers to tipped workers and distributes them among all
the workers, including non-tipped workers.
A YES VOTE would increase the minimum hourly wage an employer must pay a tipped
worker to the full state minimum wage implemented over five years, at which point employers
could pool all tips and distribute them to all non-management workers.
A NO VOTE would make no change in the law governing tip pooling or the minimum wage for
tipped workers.
Hereof fail not and make return of this warrant with your doings thereon at the time and place
of said voting.
PREGUNTA 5 Ley propuesta por petición de iniciativa
¿Aprueba la ley resumida a continuación, sobre la cual el Senado o la Cámara de
Representantes no votaron antes del 1 de mayo de 2024?
RESUMEN
Esta ley propuesta aumentaría gradualmente el salario mínimo por hora que un empleador
debe pagar a un trabajador que recibe propinas, en el transcurso de cinco años, con la
siguiente escala:
• al 64 % del salario mínimo del estado el 1 de enero de 2025;
• al 73 % del salario mínimo del estado el 1 de enero de 2026;
• al 82 % del salario mínimo del estado el 1 de enero de 2027;
• al 91 % del salario mínimo del estado el 1 de enero de 2028; y
• al 100 % del salario mínimo del estado el 1 de enero de 2029.
La ley propuesta requeriría que los empleadores sigan pagando a los trabajadores que
reciben propinas la diferencia entre el salario mínimo del estado y el monto total que recibe
un trabajador que recibe propina en salarios por hora más propinas hasta fin de 2028. La ley
propuesta también permitiría que los empleadores calculen esta diferencia durante todo el
período de nómina semanal o quincenal. El requisito de pagar esta diferencia se
suspendería cuando el salario por hora requerido para trabajadores que reciben propina se
convierta en el 100 % del salario mínimo del estado el 1 de enero de 2029.
16
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
En virtud de la ley propuesta, si un empleador paga a sus trabajadores un salario por hora
equivalente a, como mínimo, el salario mínimo del estado, el empleador tendría permitido
administrar un “fondo común de propinas” que combine todas las propinas que los clientes
entregan a los trabajadores que reciben propina y distribuirlas entre todos los trabajadores,
incluidos aquellos que no reciben propinas.
UN VOTO DE “SÍ” aumentaría el salario mínimo por hora que un empleador debe pagar a
un trabajador que recibe propina al salario mínimo total del estado, a implementarse en el
transcurso de cinco años, momento en el que los empleador podrán crear un fondo común
con todas las propinas y distribuirlas a todos los trabajadores que no formen parte de la
gerencia.
UN VOTO DE “NO” no provocaría cambios en la ley que regula la creación de un fondo
común de propinas ni en el salario mínimo para trabajadores que reciben propina.
AND BE IT FURTHER ORDERED: That the following places be and hereby are designated
as polling places for said meetings:
Y SE ORDENE ADEMÁS: Que los siguientes lugares sean y por la presente sean
designados como lugares de votación para dichas reuniones:
WARD ONE / DISTRITITO UNO
PRECINCT 1 Bentley Academy, 25 Memorial Drive
RECINTO 1 Gimnasio, Escuela Bentley Academy, 25 Memorial Drive
PRECINCT 2 Community Room, 135 Lafayette Street
RECINTO 2 Sala Comunitaria, 135 Lafayette Street
WARD TWO / DISTRITITO DOS
PRECINCT 1 & 2 Community Life Center, 401 Bridge Street
RECINTO 1 & 2 Centro De Vida Comunitaria, 401 Bridge Street
WARD THREE / DISTRITO TRES
PRECINCT 1 & 2 Salem High School Auditorium, 77 Willson Street
RECINTO 1 & 2 Auditorio, Salem High School, 77 Willson Street
WARD FOUR / DISTRITO CUATRO
PRECINCT 1 & 2 Witchcraft Heights School Gymnasium, 1 Frederick Street
RECINTO 1 & 2 Gimnasio, Escuela Witchcraft Heights, 1 Frederick Street
WARD FIVE / DISTRITO CINCO
PRECINCT 1 & 2 Saltonstall School Auditorium, 211 Lafayette Street
RECINTO 1 & 2 Auditorio, Escuela Saltonstall School, 211 Lafayette Street
WARD SIX / DISTRITO SEIS
PRECINCT 1 & 2 Bates School Gymnasium, 53 Liberty Hill Avenue
RECINTO 1 & 2 Gimnasio, Escuela Bates School, 53 Liberty Hill Avenue
17
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
WARD SEVEN / DISTRITO SIETE
PRECINCT 1 & 2 Salem State Enterprise Center, 121 Loring Avenue
RECINTO 1 & 2 Salem State Enterprise Center, 121 Loring Avenue
AND BE IT FURTHER ORDERED: That the polls at said meetings be opened at 7:00 a.m.
and closed at 8:00 p.m. and that the City Clerk be instructed to post this notice as required by
law.
Y SE ORDENE ADEMÁS: Que las urnas en dichas reuniones se abran a las 7:00 a.m. y se
cierren a las 8:00 p.m. y que se instruya a la Secretaria de la Municipal para que publique
este aviso como lo exige la ley.
#487 – NATIONAL GRID AND VERIZON TO INSTALL 1 JO POLE AND RELOCATE 2 JO
POLES ON CANAL STREET
On a petition from National Grid and Verizon to Install 1 Jointly Owned Pole and Relocate 2
Jointly Owned Poles on Canal St., Intersection of Canal St. and Kimball Rd a hearing was
scheduled for October 17, 2024.
#488 – COMCAST TO INSTALL CONDUITS ON HAWTHORNE BLVD.
On a petition from Comcast to install Conduits on Hawthorne Blvd., for service at 13
Hawthorne Blvd. a hearing was scheduled for October 17, 2024.
#489 – PUBLIC GUIDE LICENSE APPLICATIONS
The Following License Applications were granted.
PUBLIC GUIDES: Kai Austin 190 Washington St., Brighton
Conor Burke 12 Juniper Rd., Hamilton
Elizabeth Ciampa 28 Pond St., Beverly
Erin Labate 16 Newhall St., Lynn
Owen Williams 63 Bartlett St., Andover
#490 – #491 - DRAINLAYER/CONTRACT OPERATOR LICENSE APPLICATIONS
The Following Drainlayer/Contract Operator License Applications were granted.
Danella Line Services 37 Ayre Rd., Littleton
MT Mayo Corp. 10 Tower Office Pk. #204, Woburn
18
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
#492 - #493 – CLAIMS
The Following Claims were referred to the Committee on Ordinances, Licenses and Legal
Affairs.
Lisa Marescalchi 15 Mooney Rd.
Daniel Kupka 403 Essex St.
On the motion of Councillor Prosniewski the meeting adjourned at 7:43 P.M.
ATTEST: ILENE SIMONS
CITY CLERK
Agenda
City of Salem, Massachusetts
Office of the City Clerk
Ilene Simons Room 1
City Clerk City Hall
October 8, 2024
MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA
The Salem City Council will hold its regular meeting in-person on Thursday, October 10, 2024, at 7:00
P.M. in the Council Chambers, 93 Washington Street, 2nd floor for the purpose of discussing any and
all business.
In-Person shall be the primary method of public access to such meetings. A secondary method of
public access may be provided, if technologically feasible through Salem Access Television, and/or
remotely through Zoom. See below for remote access and SATV information.
Please click the link below to join the webinar:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82451274743?pwd=Hvml8iVGYGYBlHZWqayWhN8n4QenhW.1
Password: 718051
Go to the website link https://zoom.us/join. Enter Webinar ID: 824 5127 4743 followed by the
meeting password noted above in necessary.
Or by Telephone: Participants can dial a toll-free number at 877-853-5257 (Toll Free) or 888- 475-
4499 (Toll Free). When prompted, enter Webinar ID: 824 5127 4743 follow the instructions to join
the meeting. For those dialing in, you may press *9 to raise your hand to speak if signed up for public
testimony or to participate in the public hearing portion of the agenda (if applicable).
The public may also watch the meeting live on SATV on Channel 22.
Please note that it is the intent of the City Council that its meetings be available to the public in
person, remotely and through Salem Access Television.
Very truly yours,
ATTEST: ILENE SIMONS
CITY CLERK
“When in person, individuals requiring auxiliary aids and services for effective communication
such as sign language interpreter, an assistive listening device, or print material in digital format or a
reasonable modification in programs, services, policies, or activities, may contact the City of Salem
ADA Coordinator at (978-619-5630) as soon as possible and no less than 2 business days before the
meeting, program, or event.” Assistive Listening System is available for City Council Meetings. Those
interested in utilizing these devices for meetings at 93 Washington Street may contact the City Clerk’s
Office at 978-745-9595 ext. 41200 or isimons@salem.com.
“Know Your Rights Under the Open Meeting Law, M.G.L. c. 30A ss. 18-25, and
City Ordinance Sections 2-2028 through 2-2033.”
2
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
A Regular Meeting of the City Council was held in-person on Thursday, October 10, 2024, at
7:00 P.M. for the purpose of transacting any and all business. Notice of this meeting was
posted on October 8, 2024, at 12:56 P.M. This meeting is being recorded and is live on
S.A.T.V. and Zoom unless technological issues interrupt the transmission.
Councillors absent:
Council President Hapworth presided.
Councillor moved to dispense with the reading of the record of the previous
meeting. VOTED
President Hapworth requested that everyone please rise to recite the Pledge of Allegiance.
Salem City Council Land Acknowledgment
The Salem City Council honors that this land is Naumkeag, or fishing place, where
generations of Naumkeag people from the Pawtucket band of the Massachusett Tribe lived
and passed through for centuries.
We acknowledge that this is unceded Indigenous land and also acknowledge the
Massachusett Tribe, who continue to honor and hold this land into the present.
Salem’s City Council is committed to having ongoing meaningful dialogue with the indigenous
peoples who have presence in Salem in order to dismantle the legacies of oppression and
inequities that persist today.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY
Public Testimony not to exceed 15 minutes. Public Testimony is not a public hearing
or question and answer period. Sign up must occur 30 minutes prior to meeting. The
President shall, depending on the number of speakers, set a time limit, not to exceed
three minutes, which each individual presenting testimony must abide.
How to Sign Up:
You may participate in Public Testimony in-person or remotely, if technologically feasible by
either of the following two methods:
1. On-line form by using the link below:
https://records.salem.com/Forms/PublicMeetingSpeaker
This form will be available beginning 6:30 P.M. on the Tuesday before the meeting and
remains open until 6:30 P.M. on the day of the Council Meeting. This form requests
information such as your name, address, and whether you will attend in person or remotely.
3
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
If the on-line form is not available due to technology issues, you must use option #2. In
addition, if you signed up for public testimony on zoom, we will allow you to speak as long as
it is technologically feasible.
2. You may also sign the roster in the City Clerk’s Office, no later than 6:30 P.M. on the
date of the meeting.
4
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
HEARINGS
Held from the last meeting a request from National Grid to install 1 Jointly Owned Pole on
Margin St. at the intersection of Summer St. and Margin St.
APPEARING IN FAVOR:
APPEARING IN OPPOSITION:
Action Contemplated
Councillor Morsillo Moved to close the Public Hearing Voted
Councillor Morsillo Moved Granted Voted
5
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS
Held from the last meeting The Mayor’s Appointment of Thomas Pineros Shields 7 Bristol St to the
Affordable Housing Trust Fund Board with a term to expire January 14, 2026
Action Contemplated
Councillor Cohen Moved Confirmation by RCV Yeas Nays Absent
Held from the last meeting The Mayor’s Appointment of to the Food Policy Council, with a term to
expire September 23, 2027.
Shelmy Mendez 34 Willson St.
Celia Grant 8 Alvah Kittredge Pk, Roxbury
Action Contemplated
Councillor Varela Moved Confirmation by RCV Yeas Nays Absent
Held from the last meeting The Mayor’s Re-appointment of Jim Bostick to the Public Art
Commission September 24, 2026.
Action Contemplated
Councillor Varela Moved Confirmation by RCV Yeas Nays Absent
The Mayor’s Appointment of Doneeca Thurston-Chavez 12 Osborne St. #2 to the Housing
Authority Board, with a term to expire May 27, 2027.
Councillor Stott Suspension of the Rules Councillor Object
Action Contemplated
Councillor Stott Moved Held Under the Rules Voted
6
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS
The Mayor’s Re-appointment of the following with terms set forth below:
Term
Name Board/Commission Term Expiration
Length
Carly Dwyer Naik Public Art Commission 2 years 10/12/2026
Affordable Housing Trust Fund
Megan Boyle 2 years 10/26/2026
Board
Councillor Varela Suspension of the Rules Councillor Object
Action Contemplated
Councillor Varela Moved Held Under the Rules Voted
The Mayor’s Re-appointment of Christopher Chigas of 5 Tammie Lane, Peabody to serve as
a Constable with the term to expire October 3, 2027
Action Contemplated
Councillor Varela Received & Filed Voted
7
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE MAYOR
ORDERED: That the sum of Forty-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Sixteen Dollars and Eighty Cents
($49,616.80) be approved within the “Retirement Stabilization Fund-Vacation/Sick Leave Buyback”
account (83113-5146) to be expended for the contractual buyback(s) listed below in accordance
with the recommendation of His Honor the Mayor.
Name Department Amount
Salem Fire $49,616.80
Dean Larrabee
Department
TOTAL $49,616.80
Councillor Merkl Suspension of the Rules Councillor Objection
Action Contemplated
Councillor Merkl Moved Adoption Voted
OR
Referred to the Comm. on
Admin. & Finance Voted
ORDERED: To accept the donation from the Salem Police Superior Officers Association (SPSOA)
and Salem Police Patrol Officers Association (SPPOA) of a 2024 model, 7’ x 14’ EZ Hauler
Enclosed Cargo Trailer valued at $9,483.90 in accordance with the recommendation of His Honor
the Mayor.
Action Contemplated
Councillor Merkl Moved Adoption Voted
OR
Referred to the Comm. on
Admin. & Finance Voted
8
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE MAYOR
Resolution: Recognizing the Service of John Boris
WHEREAS: On October 10, 2024, we pay tribute to John Boris, as he steps down from official
service to the City of Salem after a lifetime of dedication to the community.
WHEREAS: John Boris moved to Salem more than 65 years ago and committed his life to supporting
the community, both with formal and informal efforts. He often refers to his approach to service as
“grassroots” oriented. He is dedicated to helping in whatever ways he can, and he is particularly
focused on Salem’s needs around affordable housing, homelessness, food insecurity, disability rights
and autism.
WHEREAS: John survived a challenging start to life that ultimately influenced his compassionate
outlook and approach to serving the community. When he was still a teenager, he quit high school and
went into the military, where he served in France for two years. He eventually returned to
Massachusetts where he worked hard to finish high school in his twenties. Next, he attended Bentley
College, where he earned a Bachelor of Science in Accounting.
WHEREAS: John’s official community service has included time as a member of the Salem Housing
Authority Board (including many years as Chair), the Affordable Housing Trust Fund Board, and the
Community Preservation Committee.
WHEREAS: John has been a compassionate resource for people seeking housing, has personally paid
for hundreds of people and families in crisis to stay in hotels temporarily, and worked to find longer
term housing for them as well.
WHEREAS: John has served on the board of Northeast Arc and has remained a very committed
volunteer through that organization, assisting community members who have disabilities throughout
the area. He and his wife, Anne, have donated hundreds of weighted blankets to community members
with autism throughout the Northshore.
WHEREAS: In 2019, John was honored with the American Red Cross Enduring Hero Award for his
invaluable support to the Salem Police Department for their annual ‘National Night Out’ event.
9
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE MAYOR
WHEREAS: John is well-known around the community as a resource to turn to and a solver of
monumental problems, as well as a deeply generous person.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Mayor of the City of Salem and the Salem City
Council express our sincere appreciation and gratitude to John Boris for the dedication, kindness and
generosity he has shared throughout his lifetime as a community member of Salem.
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That this Resolution be made a matter of record of these
proceedings, and that a suitable copy be presented to John Boris along with a copy of the City Seal on
behalf of the Mayor, the City Council, and the residents of Salem.
Action Contemplated
Councillor Harvey Moved Adoption by RCV Yeas Nays Abs
10
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
MAYOR’S INFORMATIONAL PAGE
NONE
11
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
MOTIONS, ORDERS AND RESOLUTIONS
ORDERED: That the Salem City Council officially designate the corner of Daniels Street and
Daniels Street Court as Soboczinski Square in honor of Private First Class William “Willie”
Peter Soboczinski who was killed in action on November 9, 1944 during the battle for Metz,
France.
And Be It Further Ordered: That the Veteran’s Agent working in conjunction with the Police
Traffic Division erect a suitable sign at this location.
Action Contemplated
Councillor Jeryzlo Moved Adoption Voted
ORDERED: That the Committee on Government Services co-posted with the Committee of
the Whole meet to discuss adopting the Mass General Law Chapter 59, Section 5, Clause
22I and 22J relative to the HERO Act
Action Contemplated
Councillor Prosniewski Moved Adoption Voted
12
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Councillor Merkl offered the following report for the Committee on Administration and Finance
co-posted with the Committee of the Whole to whom it was referred the matter of Resolution
and Tax Increment Exemption Agreement for 38 Norman QOZB, LLC, has considered said
matter and would recommend: Action unknown, meeting held after Agenda Deadline
Accept the Report Voted
Adopt the Report Voted
Councillor Morsillo offered the following report for the Committee on Ordinances, Licenses
and Legal Affairs to whom it was referred the matter of Granting of Certain Licenses –
Secondhand Valuables, Game Zone has considered said matter and would recommend:
Granted
Accept the Report Voted
Adopt the Report Voted
13
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY OFFICIALS
City Clerk submitted the Order for the State Election to be held on November 5, 2024
(Order ends on page 24)
ORDERED: That the meetings of the qualified voters of the City of Salem be held in the
several voting precincts in the City at the polling places designated hereinafter on TUESDAY,
THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024, from 7:00 A.M. TO 8:00 P.M. for the following
purpose:
ORDENA: Que las reuniones de los votantes calificados de la Ciudad de Salem se lleven a
cabo en los distintos precintos de votación de la Ciudad en los lugares de votación
designados a continuación el MARTES QUINTO DÍA DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2024, de 7:00
A.M. A LAS 8:00 P.M. con el siguiente fin:
To cast their votes in the State Election for the candidates for the following offices:
Emitir su voto en las Elecciones Estatales por los candidatos a los siguientes cargos:
ELECTORS OF PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT FOR THESE UNITED STATES
ELECTORES DE PRESIDENTE Y VICE PRESIDENTE POR ESTOS ESTADOS UNIDOS
SENATOR IN CONGRESS. FOR THIS COMMONWEALTH
SENADOR EN EL CONGRESO POR ESTA MANCOMUNIDAD
REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT
REPRESENTATNTE EN EL CONGRESO POR DISTRITO SEXTO
COUNCILLOR FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT
CONCEJAL POR DISTRITO QUINTO
SENATOR IN GENERAL COURT FOR THE SECOND ESSEX DISTRICT
SENADOR DE LA LEGISLATURA ESTATAL POR DISTRITO SEGUNDO DE ESSEX
REPRESENTATIVE IN GENERAL COURT FOR THE SEVENTH ESSEX DISTRICT
REPRESENTANTE DE LA LEGISLATURA ESTATAL POR DISTRITO SEPTIMO DE ESSEX
CLERK OF COURTS FOR ESSEX COUNTY
SECRETARIO DE LAS CORTES POR CONDADO DE ESSEX
REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR ESSEX SOUTHERN DISTRICT
REGISTRADOR DE ESCRITURAS PUBLICAS POR DISTRITO DE ESSEX SOUTHERN
14
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY OFFICIALS
QUESTION 1: Law Proposed by Initiative Petition
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or
the House of Representatives before May 1, 2024?
SUMMARY
This proposed law would specify that the State auditor has the authority to audit the
legislature.
A YES VOTE would specify that the State auditor has the authority to audit the legislature.
A NO VOTE would make no change in the law relative to the State Auditor’s authority.
PREGUNTA 1 Ley propuesta por petición de iniciativa
¿Aprueba la ley resumida a continuación, sobre la cual el Senado o la Cámara de
Representantes no votaron antes del 1 de mayo de 2024?
RESUMEN
Esta ley propuesta especificaría que el auditor estatal tiene la autoridad para auditar la
Legislatura.
UN VOTO DE “SÍ” especificaría que el auditor estatal tiene la autoridad para auditar la
Legislatura.
UN VOTO DE “NO” no cambiaría la ley relativa a la autoridad del auditor estatal.
QUESTION 2: LAW PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or
the House of Representatives before May 1, 2024?
SUMMARY
This proposed law would eliminate the requirement that a student pass the Massachusetts
Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) tests (or other statewide or district-wide
assessments) in mathematics, science and technology, and English in order to receive a high
school diploma. Instead, in order for a student to receive a high school diploma, the proposed
law would require the student to complete coursework certified by the student’s district as
demonstrating mastery of the competencies contained in the state academic standards in
mathematics, science and technology, and English, as well as any additional areas
determined by the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
A YES VOTE would eliminate the requirement that students pass the Massachusetts
Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) in order to graduate high school but still require
students to complete coursework that meets state standards.
15
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY OFFICIALS
A NO VOTE would make no change in the law relative to the requirement that a student pass
the MCAS in order to graduate high school.
PREGUNTA 2 Ley propuesta por petición de iniciativa
¿Aprueba la ley resumida a continuación, sobre la cual el Senado o la Cámara de
Representantes no votaron antes del 1 de mayo de 2024?
RESUMEN
Esta ley propuesta eliminaría el requisito de que un estudiante apruebe las pruebas del
Sistema de Evaluación Integral de Massachusetts (MCAS) (u otras evaluaciones estatales o
distritales) en Matemáticas, Ciencias y tecnología e Inglés para recibir un diploma de escuela
secundaria. En cambio, para que un estudiante reciba un diploma de escuela secundaria, la
ley propuesta exigiría que el estudiante complete cursos certificados por el distrito del
estudiante, que demuestren el dominio de las competencias contenidas en los estándares
académicos estatales en Matemáticas, Ciencias y tecnología e Inglés, así como en cualquier
área adicional determinada por la Junta de Educación Primaria y Secundaria.
UN VOTO DE “SÍ” eliminaría el requisito de que los estudiantes aprueben el Sistema de
Evaluación Integral de Massachusetts (MCAS) para graduarse de la escuela secundaria,
pero aún requeriría que los estudiantes completen cursos que cumplan con los estándares
estatales.
UN VOTO DE “NO” no cambiaría nada en la ley relativa al requisito de que un estudiante
apruebe el MCAS para graduarse de la escuela secundaria.
QUESTION 3: LAW PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or
the House of Representatives before May 1, 2024?
SUMMARY
The proposed law would provide Transportation Network Drivers (“Drivers”) with the right to
form unions (“Driver Organizations”) to collectively bargain with Transportation Network
Companies (“Companies”)-which are companies that use a digital network to connect riders
to drivers for pre-arranged transportation-to create negotiated recommendations concerning
wages, benefits and terms and conditions of work. Drivers would not be required to engage in
any union activities. Companies would be allowed to form multi-Company associations to
represent them when negotiating with Driver Organizations. The state would supervise the
labor activities permitted by the proposed law and would have responsibility for approving or
disapproving the negotiated recommendations. The proposed law would define certain
activities by a Company or a Driver Organization to be unfair work practices. The proposed
law would establish a hearing process for the state Employment Relations Board (“Board”) to
follow when a Company or Driver Organization is charged with an unfair work practice. The
16
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY OFFICIALS
proposed law would permit the Board to take action, including awarding compensation to
adversely affected Drivers, if it found that an unfair work practice had been committed. The
proposed law would provide for an appeal of a Board decision to the state Appeals Court.
This proposed law also would establish a procedure for determining which Drivers are Active
Drivers, meaning that they completed more than the median number of rides in the previous
six months. The proposed law would establish procedures for the Board to determine that a
Driver Organization has signed authorizations from at least five percent of Active Drivers,
entitling the Driver Organization to a list of Active Drivers; to designate a Driver Organization
as the exclusive bargaining representative for all Drivers based on signed authorizations from
at least twenty-five percent of Active Drivers; to resolve disputes over exclusive bargaining
status, including through elections; and to decertify a Driver Organization from exclusive
bargaining status. A Driver Organization that has been designated the exclusive bargaining
representative would have the exclusive right to represent the Drivers and to receive
voluntary membership dues deductions. Once the Board determined that a Driver
Organization was the exclusive bargaining representative for all Drivers, the Companies
would be required to bargain with that Driver Organization concerning wages, benefits and
terms and conditions of work. Once the Driver Organization and Companies reached
agreement on wages, benefits, and the terms and conditions of work, that agreement would
be voted upon by all Drivers who has completed at least 100 trips the previous quarter. If
approved by a majority of votes cast, the recommendations would be submitted to the state
Secretary of Labor for approval and if approved, would be effective for three years. The
proposed law would establish procedures for the mediation and arbitration if the Driver
Organization and Companies failed to reach agreement within a certain period of time. An
arbitrator would consider factors set forth in the proposed law, including whether the wages of
Drivers would be enough so that Drivers would not need to rely upon any public benefits. The
proposed law also sets out procedures for the Secretary of Labor’s review and approval of
recommendations negotiated by a Driver Organization and the
Companies and for judicial review of the Secretary’s decision. The proposed law states that
neither its provisions, an agreement nor a determination by the Secretary would be able to
lessen labor standards established by other laws. If there were any conflict between the
proposed law and existing Massachusetts labor relations law, the proposed law would
prevail. The Board would make rules and regulations as appropriate to effectuate the
proposed law. The proposed law states that, if any of its parts were declared invalid, the other
parts would stay in effect.
A YES VOTE would provide transportation network drivers the option to form unions to
collectively bargain with transportation network companies regarding wages, benefits, and
terms and conditions of work
A NO VOTE would make no change in the law relative to the ability of transportation network
drivers to form unions.
17
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY OFFICIALS
PREGUNTA 3 Ley propuesta por petición de iniciativa
¿Aprueba la ley resumida a continuación, sobre la cual el Senado o la Cámara de
Representantes no votaron antes del 1 de mayo de 2024?
RESUMEN
La ley propuesta otorgaría a los conductores de redes de transporte (“conductores”) el
derecho a formar sindicatos (“organizaciones de conductores”) para negociar colectivamente
con las empresas de redes de transporte (“empresas”), que son empresas que utilizan una
red digital que conecta a los pasajeros con los conductores para un transporte
preestablecido, a fin de crear recomendaciones negociadas sobre salarios, beneficios y
términos y condiciones de trabajo. Los conductores no estarían obligados a participar en
ninguna actividad sindical. Las empresas podrían formar asociaciones de varias empresas
para que las representen cuando negocien con las organizaciones de conductores. El
Estado supervisaría las actividades laborales permitidas por la ley propuesta y tendría la
responsabilidad de aprobar o desaprobar las recomendaciones negociadas.
La ley propuesta definiría ciertas actividades de una empresa o una organización de
conductores como prácticas laborales injustas. La ley propuesta establecería un proceso de
audiencia que la Junta de Relaciones Laborales del estado (“Junta”) seguiría cuando una
empresa u organización de conductores sea acusada de una práctica laboral injusta. La ley
propuesta permitiría a la Junta tomar medidas, incluida la concesión de una compensación a
los conductores afectados negativamente, si determina que se ha cometido una práctica
laboral injusta. La ley propuesta prevería una apelación de una decisión de la
Junta ante la Corte de Apelaciones del Estado.
Esta ley propuesta también establecería un procedimiento para determinar qué conductores
son con- ductores activos, lo que significa que completaron más de la cantidad media de
viajes en los seis meses anteriores. La ley propuesta establecería procedimientos para que
la Junta determine que una Organización de Conductores ha firmado autorizaciones de al
menos el 5 % de los conductores activos, lo que le da derecho a la
Organización de Conductores a una lista de conductores activos; para designar una
Organización de Conductores como representante exclusivo de negociación para todos los
conductores con base en autorizaciones firmadas de al menos el 25 % de los conductores
activos; para resolver disputas sobre el estatus de negociación exclusiva, incluso a través de
elecciones; y para descertificar a una Organización de Conductores del estatus de
negociación exclusiva. Una Organización de Conductores que haya sido designada como
representante exclusivo de negociación tendría el derecho exclusivo de representar a los
conductores y recibir deducciones voluntarias de las cuotas de membresía.
Una vez que la Junta determine que una Organización de Conductores es el representante
exclusivo de negociación para todos los conductores, las empresas deberán negociar con
esa Organización de Conductores sobre salarios, beneficios y términos y condiciones de
trabajo. Una vez que la Organización de Conductores y las empresas lleguen a un acuerdo
sobre salarios, beneficios y términos y condiciones de trabajo, ese acuerdo se votará por
todos los conductores que hayan completado al menos 100 viajes el trimestre anterior. Si se
18
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY OFFICIALS
aprueban por la mayoría de los votos emitidos, las recomendaciones se presentarán al
secretario de trabajo del Estado para su aprobación y, de aprobarse, entrarán en efecto
durante tres años. La ley propuesta establecería procedimientos para la mediación y el
arbitraje si la Organización de Conductores y las empresas no llegan a un acuerdo en el
transcurso de un período determinado. Un árbitro consideraría los factores establecidos en la
ley propuesta, incluso si los salarios de los conductores serían suficientes para que no
tuvieran que depender de beneficios públicos. La ley propuesta también establece
procedimientos para la revisión y aprobación por parte del secretario de trabajo de las
recomendaciones negociadas por una Organización de Conductores y las empresas, y para
la revisión judicial de la decisión del secretario.
La ley propuesta establece que ni sus disposiciones, ni un acuerdo ni una determinación del
secretario podrían reducir las normas laborales establecidas por otras leyes. Si hubiera algún
conflicto entre la ley propuesta y la ley de relaciones laborales vigente en Massachusetts,
prevalecería la ley propuesta.
La Junta elaboraría normas y reglamentos según fuera necesario para hacer efectiva la ley
propuesta.
La ley propuesta establece que, si alguna de sus partes se declarara no válida, las otras
partes permanecerían en efecto.
UN VOTO DE “SÍ” brindaría a los conductores de redes de transporte la opción de formar
sindicatos para negociar colectivamente con las empresas de redes de transporte sobre
salarios, beneficios
y términos y condiciones de trabajo.
UN VOTO DE “NO” no cambiaría nada en la ley relativa a la capacidad de los conductores
de redes de transporte para formar sindicatos.
QUESTION 4: LAW PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or
the House of Representatives before May 1, 2024?
SUMMARY
This proposed law would allow persons aged 21 and older to grow, possess, and use certain
natural psychedelic substances in certain circumstances. The psychedelic substances
allowed would be two substances found in mushrooms (psilocybin and psilocyn) and three
substances found in plants (dimethyltryptamine, mescaline, and ibogaine). These substances
could be purchased at an approved location for use under the supervision of a licensed
facilitator. This proposed law would otherwise prohibit any retail sale of natural psychedelic
substances. This proposed law would also provide for the regulation and taxation of these
psychedelic substances. This proposed law would license and regulate facilities offering
supervised use of these psychedelic substances and provide for the taxation of proceeds
from those facilities’ sales of psychedelic substances. It would also allow persons aged 21
and older to grow these psychedelic substances in a 12-foot by 12-foot area at their home
19
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY OFFICIALS
and use these psychedelic substances at their home. This proposed law would authorize
persons aged 21 or older to possess up to one gram of psilocybin, one gram of psilocyn, one
gram of dimethyltryptamine, 18 grams of mescaline, and 30 grams of ibogaine (“personal use
amount”), in addition to whatever they might grow at their home, and to give away up to the
personal use amount to a person aged 21 or over. This proposed law would create a Natural
Psychedelic Substances Commission of five members appointed by the Governor, Attorney
General, and Treasurer which would administer the law governing the use and distribution of
these psychedelic substances. The Commission would adopt regulations governing licensing
qualifications, security, recordkeeping, education and training, health and safety
requirements, testing, and age verification. This proposed law would also create a Natural
Psychedelic Substances Advisory Board of 20 members appointed by the Governor, Attorney
General, and Treasurer which would study and make recommendations to the Commission
on the regulation and taxation of these psychedelic substances. This proposed law would
allow cities and towns to reasonably restrict the time, place, and manner of the operation of
licensed facilities offering psychedelic substances, but cities and towns could not ban those
facilities or their provision of these substances. The proceeds of sales of psychedelic
substances at licensed facilities would be subject to the state sales tax and an additional
excise tax of 15 percent. In addition, a city or town could impose a separate tax of up to two
percent. Revenue received from the additional state excise tax, license application fees, and
civil penalties for violations of this proposed law would be deposited in a Natural Psychedelic
Substances Regulation Fund and would be used, subject to appropriation, for administration
of this proposed law. Using the psychedelic substances as permitted by this proposed law
could not be a basis to deny a person medical care or public assistance, impose discipline by
a professional licensing board, or enter adverse orders in child custody cases absent clear
and convincing evidence that the activities created an unreasonable danger to the safety of a
minor child. This proposed law would not affect existing laws regarding the operation of motor
vehicles while under the influence, or the ability of employers to enforce workplace policies
restricting the consumption of these psychedelic substances by employees. This proposed
law would allow property owners to prohibit the use, display, growing, processing, or sale of
these psychedelic substances on their premises. State and local governments could continue
to restrict the possession and use of these psychedelic substances in public buildings or at
schools. This proposed law would take effect on December 15, 2024.
A YES VOTE would allow persons over age 21 to use certain natural psychedelic substances
under licensed supervision and to grow and possess limited quantities of those substances in
their home and would create a commission to regulate those substances.
A NO VOTE would make no change in the law regarding natural psychedelic substances.
PREGUNTA 4 Ley propuesta por petición de iniciativa
¿Aprueba la ley resumida a continuación, sobre la cual el Senado o la Cámara de
Representantes no votaron antes del 1 de mayo de 2024?
20
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY OFFICIALS
RESUMEN
La ley propuesta permitiría que las personas mayores de 21 años cultiven, posean y
consuman ciertas sustancias psicodélicas naturales en determinadas circunstancias. Las
sustancias psicodélicas permitidas serían dos sustancias que se encuentran en hongos
(psilocibina y psilocina) y tres sustancias que se encuentran en plan- tas (dimetiltriptamina,
mescalina e ibogaína). Estas sustancias se podían adquirir en un lugar aprobado para su
consumo bajo la supervisión de un facilitador con licencia. A menos que se indique lo
contrario, esta ley propuesta prohibiría toda venta minorista de sustancias psicodélicas
naturales. La ley propuesta también establecería la regulación de estas sustancias
psicodélicas y la aplicación de impuestos a estas.
La ley propuesta otorgaría licencias y regularía los establecimientos que ofrecen el consumo
supervisado de estas sustancias psicodélicas, y establecería la aplicación de impuestos a
dichos establecimientos sobre las ganancias obtenidas de las ventas de sustancias
psicodélicas. También permitiría que personas mayores de 21 años cultiven dichas
sustancias psicodélicas en un área de 12 pies por 12 pies en sus casas, y consuman dichas
sustancias psicodélicas en su casa. La ley propuesta autorizaría a personas mayores de 21
años a poseer hasta un gramo de psilocibina, un gramo de psilocina, un gramo de
dimetiltriptamina, 18 gramos de mescalina y 30 gramos de ibogaína (“cantidad para consumo
personal”), además de lo que sea que cultiven en sus casas, y a regalar a una persona
mayor de 21 años una cantidad de hasta la cantidad para consumo personal.
La ley propuesta crearía una Comisión de Sustancias Psicodélicas Naturales conformada
por cinco miembros designados por el gobernador, el fiscal general y el tesorero, que
administraría la ley que rige el consumo y la distribución de estas sustancias psicodélicas. La
Comisión adoptaría reglamentaciones que rijan las calificaciones para la obtención de
licencias, la seguridad, el mantenimiento de registros, la educación y capacitación, los
requisitos de salud y seguridad, las pruebas y la verificación de la edad. La ley propuesta
también crearía una Junta de Asesoramiento sobre Sustancias Psicodélicas Naturales
conformada por 20 miembros designados por el gobernador, el fiscal general y el tesorero,
que estudiaría y haría recomendaciones a la Comisión sobre la regulación y la aplicación de
impuestos sobre estas sustancias psicodélicas.
La ley propuesta permitiría que ciudades y pueblos limiten de manera razonable el momento,
el lugar y la manera de operar los establecimientos con licencia que ofrecen sustancias
psicodélicas, pero las ciudades y los pueblos no podrían prohibir dichos establecimientos ni
que estos proporcionen dichas sustancias.
Las ganancias obtenidas de la venta de sustancias psicodélicas en centros con licencia
quedarían sujetas al impuesto del estado sobre las venta y a un impuesto adicional sobre
consumos específicos del 15 %. Además, una ciudad o municipalidad podría aplicar un
impuesto por separado de hasta un 2 %. Las ganancias obtenidas del impuesto adicional
sobre consumos específicos, las tarifas de solicitud de licencia y las multas civiles por
incumplimiento de la ley propuesta se depositarían en un Fondo de Regulación de
Sustancias Psicodélicas Naturales y se usarían para la administración de esta ley propuesta,
sujeto a apropiación.
21
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY OFFICIALS
El consumo de sustancias psicodélicas según lo permite esta ley propuesta no podría ser
motivo para negar atención médica o asistencia pública a una persona, imponer una acción
disciplinaria por parte de una junta de licencias profesionales ni emitir órdenes judiciales
perjudiciales en casos de tenencia de niños, ante ausencia de evidencia clara y convincente
de que las actividades creen un peligro inaceptable para la seguridad de un niño menor de
edad.
La ley propuesta no afectaría las leyes existentes sobre la operación de vehículos
motorizados bajo los efectos de estas sustancias ni la capacidad de los empleadores de
imponer políticas en el lugar de trabajo que limiten el consumo de estas sustancias
psicodélicas por parte de los empleados. La ley propuesta permitiría que los propietarios
prohíban el consumo, la exhibición, el cultivo, el procesamiento o la venta de estas
sustancias psicodélicas en sus instalaciones. El Gobierno estatal y el Gobierno local podrían
seguir limitando la posesión y el consumo de estas sustancias psicodélicas en edificios
públicos o en escuelas.
La ley propuesta entraría en vigor el 15 de diciembre de 2024.
UN VOTO DE “SÍ” permitiría que las personas mayores de 21 años consuman ciertas
sustancias psicodéli- cas naturales bajo supervisión de una persona con licencia y a cultivas
y poseer cantidades limitadas de dichas sustancias en su casa, y crearía una comisión que
regule dichas sustancias.
UN VOTO DE “NO” no realizaría cambios en la ley sobre sustancias psicodélicas naturales.
QUESTION 5: LAW PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or
the House of Representatives before May 1, 2024?
SUMMARY
The proposed law would gradually increase the minimum hourly wage an employer must pay
a tipped worker, over the course of five years, on the following schedule:
• To 64% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2025;
• To 73% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2026;
• To 82% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2027;
• To 91% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2028; and
• To 100% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2029
The proposed law would require employers to continue to pay tipped workers the difference
between the state minimum wage and the total amount a tipped worker receives in hourly
wages plus tips through the end of 2028. The proposed law would also permit employers to
calculate this difference over the entire weekly or bi-weekly payroll period. The requirement to
pay this difference would cease when the required hourly wage for tipped workers would
become 100% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2029.
22
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY OFFICIALS
Under the proposed law, if an employer pays its workers an hourly wage that is at least the
state minimum wage, the employer would be permitted to administer a “tip pool” that
combines all the tips given by customers to tipped workers and distributes them among all
the workers, including non-tipped workers.
A YES VOTE would increase the minimum hourly wage an employer must pay a tipped
worker to the full state minimum wage implemented over five years, at which point employers
could pool all tips and distribute them to all non-management workers.
A NO VOTE would make no change in the law governing tip pooling or the minimum wage for
tipped workers.
Hereof fail not and make return of this warrant with your doings thereon at the time and place
of said voting.
PREGUNTA 5 Ley propuesta por petición de iniciativa
¿Aprueba la ley resumida a continuación, sobre la cual el Senado o la Cámara de
Representantes no votaron antes del 1 de mayo de 2024?
RESUMEN
Esta ley propuesta aumentaría gradualmente el salario mínimo por hora que un empleador
debe pagar a un trabajador que recibe propinas, en el transcurso de cinco años, con la
siguiente escala:
• al 64 % del salario mínimo del estado el 1 de enero de 2025;
• al 73 % del salario mínimo del estado el 1 de enero de 2026;
• al 82 % del salario mínimo del estado el 1 de enero de 2027;
• al 91 % del salario mínimo del estado el 1 de enero de 2028; y
• al 100 % del salario mínimo del estado el 1 de enero de 2029.
La ley propuesta requeriría que los empleadores sigan pagando a los trabajadores que
reciben propinas la diferencia entre el salario mínimo del estado y el monto total que recibe
un trabajador que recibe propina en salarios por hora más propinas hasta fin de 2028. La ley
propuesta también permitiría que los empleadores calculen esta diferencia durante todo el
período de nómina semanal o quincenal. El requisito de pagar esta diferencia se
suspendería cuando el salario por hora requerido para trabajadores que reciben propina se
convierta en el 100 % del salario mínimo del estado el 1 de enero de 2029.
En virtud de la ley propuesta, si un empleador paga a sus trabajadores un salario por hora
equivalente a, como mínimo, el salario mínimo del estado, el empleador tendría permitido
administrar un “fondo común de propinas” que combine todas las propinas que los clientes
entregan a los trabajadores que reciben propina y distribuirlas entre todos los trabajadores,
incluidos aquellos que no reciben propinas.
23
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY OFFICIALS
UN VOTO DE “SÍ” aumentaría el salario mínimo por hora que un empleador debe pagar a
un trabajador que recibe propina al salario mínimo total del estado, a implementarse en el
transcurso de cinco años, momento en el que los empleador podrán crear un fondo común
con todas las propinas y distribuirlas a todos los trabajadores que no formen parte de la
gerencia.
UN VOTO DE “NO” no provocaría cambios en la ley que regula la creación de un fondo
común de propinas ni en el salario mínimo para trabajadores que reciben propina.
AND BE IT FURTHER ORDERED: That the following places be and hereby are designated
as polling places for said meetings:
Y SE ORDENE ADEMÁS: Que los siguientes lugares sean y por la presente sean
designados como lugares de votación para dichas reuniones:
WARD ONE / DISTRITITO UNO
PRECINCT 1 Bentley Academy, 25 Memorial Drive
RECINTO 1 Gimnasio, Escuela Bentley Academy, 25 Memorial Drive
PRECINCT 2 Community Room, 135 Lafayette Street
RECINTO 2 Sala Comunitaria, 135 Lafayette Street
WARD TWO / DISTRITITO DOS
PRECINCT 1 & 2 Community Life Center, 401 Bridge Street
RECINTO 1 & 2 Centro De Vida Comunitaria, 401 Bridge Street
WARD THREE / DISTRITO TRES
PRECINCT 1 & 2 Salem High School Auditorium, 77 Willson Street
RECINTO 1 & 2 Auditorio, Salem High School, 77 Willson Street
WARD FOUR / DISTRITO CUATRO
PRECINCT 1 & 2 Witchcraft Heights School Gymnasium, 1 Frederick Street
RECINTO 1 & 2 Gimnasio, Escuela Witchcraft Heights, 1 Frederick Street
WARD FIVE / DISTRITO CINCO
PRECINCT 1 & 2 Saltonstall School Auditorium, 211 Lafayette Street
RECINTO 1 & 2 Auditorio, Escuela Saltonstall School, 211 Lafayette Street
WARD SIX / DISTRITO SEIS
PRECINCT 1 & 2 Bates School Gymnasium, 53 Liberty Hill Avenue
RECINTO 1 & 2 Gimnasio, Escuela Bates School, 53 Liberty Hill Avenue
WARD SEVEN / DISTRITO SIETE
PRECINCT 1 & 2 Salem State Enterprise Center, 121 Loring Avenue
RECINTO 1 & 2 Salem State Enterprise Center, 121 Loring Avenue
24
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY OFFICIALS
AND BE IT FURTHER ORDERED: That the polls at said meetings be opened at 7:00 a.m.
and closed at 8:00 p.m. and that the City Clerk be instructed to post this notice as required by
law.
Y SE ORDENE ADEMÁS: Que las urnas en dichas reuniones se abran a las 7:00 a.m. y se
cierren a las 8:00 p.m. y que se instruya a la Secretaria de la Municipal para que publique
este aviso como lo exige la ley.
Action Contemplated
Councillor Prosniewski Moved Adoption by RCV Yea Nay Abs
25
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
PETITIONS
A petition from National Grid and Verizon to Install 1 Jointly Owned Pole and Relocate 2
Jointly Owned Poles on Canal St., Intersection of Canal St. and Kimball Rd.
A petition from Comcast to install Conduits on Hawthorne Blvd., for service at 13 Hawthorne
Blvd.
HEARINGS ORDERED OCTOBER 17, 2024
The Following License Applications:
PUBLIC GUIDES: Kai Austin 190 Washington St., Brighton
Conor Burke 12 Juniper Rd., Hamilton
Elizabeth Ciampa 28 Pond St., Beverly
Erin Labate 16 Newhall St., Lynn
Owen Williams 63 Bartlett St., Andover
Action Contemplated
Councillor Morsillo Moved Granted Voted
The Following Drainlayer/Contract Operator License Application:
Danella Line Services 37 Ayre Rd., Littleton
MT Mayo Corp. 10 Tower Office Pk. #204, Woburn
Action Contemplated
Councillor Morsillo Moved Granted Voted
The Following Claims:
Lisa Marescalchi 15 Mooney Rd.
Daniel Kupka 403 Essex St.
Action Contemplated
Councillor Morsillo Moved referred Comm. on Voted
Ord., Lic. & Legal Affairs
26
CITY OF SALEM
OCTOBER 10, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
NONE
On the motion of Councillor Prosniewski the meeting adjourned at P.M.
Get email alerts for Salem
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.