City Council
Regular MeetingSalem, MA · September 4, 2025
Minutes
City of Salem, Massachusetts
“Know Your Rights Under the Open Meeting Law, M.G.L. c. 30A ss. 18-25 and
City Ordinance Sections 2-2028 through 2-2033.”
The City Council Committee on Ordinances Licenses and Legal Affairs co-posted with the Committee of the
Whole____________________________________________________________________________________
met in the Council Chamber on _Thursday September 4, 2025 _____________ at ______6:00_______P.M.
for the purpose of discussing the matters(s) listed below. Notice of this meeting was posted on
__August 1, 2025__ at ___ 12:23 P.M._
(This meeting is being recorded)
ATTENDANCE
OLLA – Hapworth (chair), Morsillo, Jerzylo, Varela (Zoom). COW – Prosniewski & Watson-Felt (Zoom). City – Jeremy Fiske,
Beth Rennard.
ABSENT WERE: OLLA - Cohen. COW – Davis, Stott, Merkl, Harvey.
SUBJECT(S)
#361 Ordinance to amend Ordinance relative to noise control on Essex St. Pedestrian Mall and Adjacent Streets.
Rennard – We met with the police to discuss the noise levels on the busy weekends in October from last year. We
found that the ambient noise level is higher than the maximum noise level in the current ordinance. Also, the
ordinance is confusing to read so we cleaned it up to make it easier to interpret. During the overnight hours from
8pm to 8am, the noise decibel is not to exceed 68, which would be like a normal conversation level. During the
daytime hours, we increase the decibels to 72. In the performance areas like near the big fountain and Old Town
Hall, we increased the daytime decibel level to 79. We also added in a catch-all, because sometimes the ambient
noise level is at or near the maximum so the official that is checking the levels can allow the decibels to increase to
10 above the ambient noise level and still be compliant.
Hapworth – Where is the reading being taken to determine the ambient noise?
Rennard – They take the reading 15 feet away from the performer, which is noted in the last sentence of the first
paragraph, 226B.
Jerzylo – I read in OSHA guidelines that you shouldn’t have it more than 80 decibels for more than 8 hours. We talk
about the tourists and street vendors, but we don’t talk about the effect on the residents.
Rennard – OSHA is a workplace guideline and the space that we are talking about is a public space, so it is a
balancing act. We must allow people to express themselves because it becomes a 1st Amendments issue because
the performers need to be able to express themselves. We do still have areas where there is no amplification
allowed so we are trying to mitigate it while still allowing people to express themselves.
Hapworth – This gives the police the ability to enforce it which it isn’t an enforceable ordinance because the
ambient noise was exceeding the maximum noise levels in the current ordinance. We are trying to create an
ordinance that is enforceable.
Morsillo – I don’t understand the ambient noise. If the performers are allowed to be louder than the ambient noise
level, then doesn’t everything around them get louder? Also, why are there going to be higher decibels allowed on
Front St. and East India Square?
Rennard – Before the police take a decibel reading, they have the performer stop performing to see what the
ambient noise level is without the performer. If it is at 70, then they can allow the performer to be as loud as 80, or
10 decibels above the ambient noise level. If they are too loud, then they will work with them to get to a noise level
within the required limit.
Fiske – We are going to try to draw people off the pedestrian mall. Front St will be closed on the weekends from the
end of September through October and there will be performances scheduled in that area so the performers will be
spread out more. East India Square and Front St. can be closed off so we can better control the area as opposed to
other areas that can’t be closed/controlled as well.
Varela – What happens if the ambient noise levels is higher than the state max? Is there a way to lower the ambient
noise?
Rennard – We will be posting the ordinance and map with a QR code. Most performers want to comply, so this
allows the police to deal with those that are in non-compliance.
Prosniewski – It is expected and reasonable to be loud downtown during this time. There are a few performers that
try to take advantage. Most of the complaints come from the performers that have amplification like the preachers.
It is difficult to enforce with the current ordinance so having this ordinance will help. Occasionally there is a citation
but most of the performers comply. A lot of it comes down to whether it is reasonable or not.
Morsillo – What is the maximum that this can go?
Rennard – if the ambient noise is higher than what is in the ordinance, then at the police’s discretion, the performer
can go 10 decibels higher, but I don’t know what the highest levels have been in the past, I can check on it.
Fiske – A lot of it last year was amplification. Spreading out the performers should help.
Morsillo – How many complaints do we get from the residents and from the performers?
Rennard – Probably about every day for the week leading up Halloween from residents.
Hapworth – We are trying to fix the ordinance so that it can be enforced.
Prosniewski – I don’t know that we have gotten complaint regarding the ambient noise and if we did, I don’t know
how you could control that. The ambient noise level is directly related to how loud the street performers get
especially with amplification.
Hapworth – If there was a bucket drummer playing outside today, he would be violating the noise ordinance, but if
it was October 20th, and he was playing and we could hear it 3 blocks away, then this ordinance would allow the
police to cite him if he refused to comply.
Watson-Felt – I am concerned that there is no cap on the noise level if the ambient noise is louder than the
ordinance allows. I also have a problem with the duration because a sustained amount of sound over time affects
people, and a lot of people are working from home right now. My other concern is the location of the performers.
If they are too close together then the volume could be even louder if there are more than one competing to be
heard. Did you consider time, place and manner while revising the ordinance? The street performers should be
given designated locations to play instead of letting them self-regulate.
Rennard – The hours are in the ordinance. There are regulations for the street performers that have distance
requirements. Jeremy and Sgt. Ball will be relocating the performers if they are too close together. Since we are
closing Front St. this year and scheduling some of the performers time slots there, we will see how that goes and
maybe we could do more of that in the future but if we were to do that on the pedestrian walkway, then we would
need a raised stage maybe near the fountain.
Morsillo – Are the performers that are going to be in the performance zones the regulars or are we going to expand
it to school groups? How are you going to manage the sign-ups and how is the word getting out?
Fiske – John at Creative Collective is handling the signups.
Morsillo – What about the time duration limitations? Can you tell folks that they can be in a specific spot for an
hour and then they have to go a new one?
Rennard - It’s like the anti-loitering laws they have been found to be unconstitutional. I haven’t found a way to do
that yet.
Jerzylo – Do we have to start it at 8am or can we start it at 10am?
Hapworth – So anywhere it says 8am, we will change it to 10am.
Jerzylo – Motion to amend to change 8am to 10am in sections 1-3 and seconded by Morsillo. Motion carries 4-0.
Morsillo – Motion to refer this to the full council as amended with a positive recommendation and seconded by
Jerzylo. Motion carries 4-0.
On the motion of C. Morsillo meeting adjourned at 6:43P.M.
________________________________________________________
(Chairperson)
Agenda
City of Salem, Massachusetts
Office of the City Clerk
Ilene Simons
City Clerk
August 1, 2025
MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA
The City Council Committee on Ordinances, Licenses and Legal Affairs co-
posted with the Committee of the Whole will meet in person on Thursday,
September 4, 2025, at 6:00 PM for the purpose of discussing Ordinance to
amend Ordinance relative to Noise Control on Essex St. Pedestrian Mall and
adjacent Streets. This meeting will be held in the City Council Chambers. 93
Washington St., Salem, MA, 2nd Floor.
Back-up Documents:
https://cityofsalem1.sharepoint.com/:f:/s/CityCouncil/EtwE4iiBJlNBkKJYYKTtNm4BIjNwQJQl
YqYUiuhCByjkPg?e=OxXfSN
Please click the link below to join the webinar:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82415420686?pwd=gELn9hlsXsi0y8P8xn5V6Ea8D5QaML.1
Password: 058953
In-Person shall be the primary method of public access to such meetings. A
secondary method of public access may be provided, if technologically
feasible through Salem Access Television, and or remotely through Zoom.
See below for remote access and SATV Information.
City of Salem City Council Committee on Ordinances, Licenses and Legal
Affairs, co- posted COW, September 4, 2025
Page 2 of 2
“Persons requiring auxiliary aids and services for effective communication
such as sign language interpreter, an assistive listening device, or print
material in digital format or a reasonable modification in programs, services,
policies, or activities, may contact the City of Salem ADA Coordinator at
(978-619-5630) as soon as possible and no less than 2 business days before
the meeting, program, or event.”
AGENDA
Ordinance to amend Ordinance relative to Noise Control on Essex St.
Pedestrian Mall and adjacent Streets.
Very truly yours,
ATTEST: MAUREEN E. FISHER
ASST. CITY CLERK
“Know Your Rights Under the Open Meeting Law, M.G.L. c. 30A ss.
18-25, and
City Ordinance Sections 2-2028 through 2-2033.”
Get email alerts for Salem
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.