Historical Commission
Regular MeetingSalem, MA · May 19, 2021
Minutes
May 19, 2021, Page 1 of 9
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MINUTES
May 19, 2021
A meeting of the Salem Historical Commission was held on Wednesday, May 19, 2021 at 6:00 pm Zoom Virtual
Meeting Present were; Rebecca English, Reed Cutting, Vijay Joyce, Milo Martinez, Mark Meche, Stacey Norkun,
Mark Pattison, and Larry Spang. Not present: Erin Schaeffer
140 Derby Street- CONTINUATION
Patrick Shea submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for paint colors
Documents & Exhibits
▪ Application: 1/4/21
▪ Photographs
▪ Stamped plans by L-Arch
Mr. Meche stated that the applicant and his architect, Steve Livermore, reached out to him after the last meeting to
review expectations but he has not heard back from either of them. Ms. Kelleher noted that they have pulled
building permits to resume other work on site going while they continue to finalize aspects of the storefront design.
VOTE: Mr. Cutting made a motion to continue to the next regular meeting on June 2, 2021. Mr. Joyce seconded
the motion. Roll Call: Commissioners English, Martinez, Meche, Pattison, Cutting, Joyce, Spang were in favor and
the motion so carried.
7 North Pine Street– CONTINUATION
Stephanie Ellis submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for exterior vents
Documents & Exhibits
▪ Application: 2/17/21
▪ Photographs
Ashley Shedd (Daughter of applicant) was present to discuss the project.
Ms. Shedd stated that the current dryer vent and tubing exit towards the back of the roof. They are proposing to
exit the vent out the side of the house below the fascia board to shorten the distance the vent needs to travel. She
noted that the Commission had recommended the use of Hide-A-Vent, but this vent style is more vertical than the
siding they have on the building and they are unsure of other options to propose. Hide-A-Vent only has a shake
style cover so they would prefer to go with their vent cover they originally proposed, painted to match.
Mr. Joyce requested dimensions of the originally proposed dryer vent. Ms. Shedd estimated 6-inches x 6-inches
and requested an additional option be provided if the original proposal wasn’t acceptable. Mr. Meche had no issue
with the original proposal since it will be placed high on the façade.
Public Comment: No one in the assembly wished to speak.
VOTE: Mr. Martinez made a motion to approve the application with condition that applicant provided vent model
number for property file. Mr. Cutting seconded the motion. Roll Call: Commissioners English, Norkun, Martinez,
Meche, Pattison, Cutting, Joyce, Spang were in favor and the motion so carried.
Roof Vent
May 19, 2021, Page 2 of 9
Ms. Shedd stated that a 12-inch x 12-inch turbine fan is proposed at the existing vent location which is the current
opening for the old dryer tubing, so there will be no new opening in the roof. There is also a cut out in the roof that
was patched over and will be repurposed. An existing tree will also provide coverage making fan less visible.
Public Comment: No one in the assembly wished to speak.
VOTE: Mr. Joyce made a motion to approve as submitted. Mr. Cutting seconded the motion. Mr. Joyce amended
the motion to require the applicant to provide model numbers for the historic commissions file. Mr. Cutting
seconded the amendment. Roll Call: Commissioners English, Norkun, Martinez, Meche, Pattison, Cutting, Joyce,
Spang were in favor and the motion so carried.
11 Orne Square – CONTINUATION
Pamela Coffin submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace a shed
Documents & Exhibits
▪ Application: 4/12/21
▪ Photographs
▪ Eastern Shed information
Pamela Coffin was present to discuss the project.
Ms. Coffin stated that the Aspen style shed will be 10-feet-deep x 12-feet-wide with 3-tab dual black asphalt
shingle roof at an 5x12 roof pitch, with pine T&G clapboards with the large overhang on the sides and older style
vents below the roof ridge. The shed will be tucked into the corner as far as possible to avoid an existing tree and
telephone pole and the windows and door will be visible from the street. Mr. Pattison requested the trim material.
Ms. Coffin replied pine boards no PVC and she also submitted several historic paint colors besides the typical Orne
Green that is used throughout the street. The fence is Orne Square Green and she would prefer that it not be the
same color. She suggested a slight variation, such as Van Duesen Blue. Ms. Norkun agreed with a different color
selection.
Public Comment: No one in the assembly wished to speak.
VOTE: Mr. Martinez made a motion to approve a 10-foot x 12-foot Aspen style shed with no doors or windows
facing the street, with T&G siding, no PVC trim, asphalt roof shingles in “Dual Black”, shed to be painted “Van
Duesen Blue”. Mr. Joyce seconded the motion. Roll Call: Commissioners English, Norkun, Martinez, Meche,
Pattison, Cutting, Joyce, Spang were in favor and the motion so carried.
310 Lafayette Street- CONTINUATION
Kenneth and Monica Leisey submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace windows (after
the fact)
Documents & Exhibits
▪ Application: 12/16/21
▪ Photographs
▪ Rite Window information
Kenneth Leisey, owner, was present to discuss the project.
Mr. Leisey stated that he modified one of the replacement windows to include an exterior applied muntin in the
upper pane. He secured muntin with a 2-part epoxy for the Commission’s review but has not painted it yet. The
May 19, 2021, Page 3 of 9
manufacturer stated that the vinyl window can be painted. Mr. Meche noted that the window in questions is
minimally visible, but he also doesn’t think that the Rite Windows fit the openings well and the company should
have secured the required permits as they said they would so these non-historic windows wouldn’t have been
installed. Mr. Leisey noted that the Pella Architect series windows approved in 2017 have more glass but Rite
Windows has a lifetime warranty on the vinyl and a 50-year warranty on the glass. Mr. Meche replied that Pella
looks more like a window and has shadow lines, etc. while the Rite Window website does not show profiles or
sections. Chair Spang agreed that the Rite Windows appear as a frame within a frame to make the new vinyl
window fit the old openings and the Commission would not have approved this if they saw it sooner and their
location on the side of the house helps conceal the inconsistencies. He noted that the profile of muntin extends past
the face of the vinyl window sash and suggested the applicant taper the ends of the applied muntins to conceal the
difference. Mr. Martinez asked if the screen can easily be opened with the applied muntins in place. Mr. Leisey
replied yes, although it is tight. Mr. Joyce stated that they are not approving the window, but they are approving the
treatment by the homeowner which provides the missing shadow line on the 4 on first floor and 2 second-floor
windows only, since the Commission has no jurisdiction on rear windows. Ms. Kelleher noted that any view that is
visible from a street named in the district is under the Commission’s purview.
Public Comment: No one in the assembly wished to speak.
VOTE: Mr. Joyce made a motion to approve the existing windows that have been replaced with the condition that
after-market muntins be applied and windows be painted. Mr. Martinez amended the motion to include an approval
based off of a limited visibility only. Ms. English seconded the motion. Roll Call: Commissioners Martinez,
English, Pattison, Cutting, Joyce, and Spang were in favor, Meche was not in favor, Norkun abstained, and the
motion so carried.
159 Derby Street- CONTINUATION
Paul Nathan submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install new accessible ramp
Documents & Exhibits
▪ Application: 3/22/21
▪ Photographs
▪ Drawings by Seger Architects
Jim Bostick of the Salem Arts Association was present to discuss the project.
Mr. Bostick stated that he received positive feedback on building the ramp at the April 7th meeting and as a
community art gallery they wanted their ramp to be more creative, so they’ve suggested using plasma cut metal
railing panels in a maritime theme and cut metal panels in a foliage pattern for the ramp skirt, ensuring that the two
panel types don’t compete with one another. He has not received more information on the property line from the
National Park Association, but he was aware that the line is inches away from their structure and may be on an
angle.
Mr. Bostick noted that the proposed steel panel color is a granite gray with a darker grey skirt board below and
additional paneling below with openings large enough to allow for airflow. The panels are approximately 48” wide
and there will be no gaps larger than 4” wide to meet code requirements. Scott Lanes will complete the fabrication.
The railings will be galvanized and painted white as will the PVC trim and trim boards. The walking surface will
be Trex decking and they’ve received a variance from the state due to the length constraints and the gallery needing
handicap access.
Mr. Pattison suggested a metal skirt board rather than PVC and match the remainder of the ramp. Mr. Bostick
noted that the 4 to 6-inch-high trim board ties into the trim on the building and provides some separation between
May 19, 2021, Page 4 of 9
the upper and lower panel designs. Mr. Cutting agreed with separating the two different metal panels. Chair Spang
suggested the use of a powder coated finish for longevity. Mr. Bostick replied that he could eliminate the trim
board and increase the height of the foliage metal panels below although they preferred wood over PVC.
Public Comment:
Alan Hanscom (SATV) Supported this project and the creative detail proposed.
No one else wished to speak
Mr. Martinez suggested the panel design be adjusted so the sea creatures are shown in the water rather than
appearing to float. Mr. Meche suggested making the panels stainless steel which won’t require repainting of the
powder coating galvanized finish. Chair Spang suggested they approve the conceptual design.
VOTE: Mr. Cutting made a motion to approve as presented. Mr. Joyce seconded the motion. Roll Call:
Commissioners English, Norkun, Martinez, Meche, Pattison, Cutting, Joyce, Spang were in favor and the motion so
carried.
23 River Street- CONTINUATION
Paschal Corrigan submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to renovate the building
Documents & Exhibits
▪ Application: 4/8/21
▪ Photographs
Ms. Kelleher reported that the applicant requested a continuation to the next meeting.
VOTE: Mr. Cutting made a motion to continue to the next regular meeting. Mr. Joyce seconded the motion. Roll
Call: Commissioners English, Norkun, Martinez, Meche, Pattison, Cutting, Joyce, Spang were in favor and the
motion so carried.
180 Derby Street
Brookhouse Home submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to relocate electrical service
Documents & Exhibits
▪ Application: 4/29/21
▪ Photographs
Michael Bolduc of Bolduc Electric was present to discuss the project.
Mr. Bolduc stated that the building must be brought up to code so the knob and tube wiring must be replaced. 3-
feet is required from the conductor to each window but there isn’t enough room in its current location so service
must be relocated. The only remaining location is 13-½ feet from the corner and would require two 4-inch holes
drilled through granite foundation, and 2 steel pipes attached to brick using 2 to 3 metal steel clips every 10-feet
that would extend 20-feet high up the façade, to install the new 800-amp main, 400-amps in each pipe. The current
location is between the 4th and 5th window bay and the piping could be painted to match the brick rather than
leaving them galvanized. The second option would be between the 2nd and 3rd bays. The existing location cannot
be reused due to its proximity to the existing sprinkler service in the basement.
May 19, 2021, Page 5 of 9
Mr. Joyce noted that the proposed location is going through the original body of the home but preferred moving it
north into the area that was added. Mr. Bolduc suggested a third option to adding horizontal piping to an open area
within the basement. Mr. Joyce noted that he would not want to add horizontal piping to a building with this much
verticality. Mr. Meche suggested adding it to the telephone pole closer to the rear of the building. Mr. Bolduc
replied that the crawl space in the rear of the building doesn’t have sufficient head height. Mr. Meche suggested
burying the electrical service in the street. Mr. Bolduc replied that it be connected through the granite foundation
below grade and into the cabinet and main disconnect, but that would require a redesign by an engineer and
additional costs to the building owner. Chair Spang stated that he would rather not attach more items to the façade
of the building, despite eliminating the power drops and drop heads.
Public Comment:
Stan Usovicz (Brookhouse Board Member), Botts Court. The telephone pole is jointly owned by Verizon and
National Grid. The proposal will have to return to their Board due to cost of the changes suggested by the
Commission, but the upgrades are needed.
No one else wished to speak
VOTE: Mr. Cutting made a motion to continue to the next regular meeting on June 2, 2021. Ms. English seconded
the motion. Roll Call: Commissioners English, Norkun, Martinez, Meche, Pattison, Cutting, Joyce, Spang were in
favor and the motion so carried.
26 Beckford Street
Sara Keddy submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for architectural roof shingles (after the
fact)
Documents & Exhibits
▪ Application: 4/29/21
▪ Photographs
Sara Keddy was present to discuss the project.
Ms. Keddy reported that she had requested 3-tab shingles, but her roofer installed architectural shingles instead.
The shingles used are Owens Corning in black. Ms. Norkun noted that the shingle edges are straight rather than
angled and the color variety makes them appear more natural. Mr. Pattison agreed. Ms. Kelleher noted that the
proposed is consistent with what the Commission has approved in the past.
Public Comment:
David Hart. 104 Federal Street. The roof was installed very quickly, the design is subtle and black, and it is hard to
tell the difference between what was installed and 3-tab shingles. He suggested noting that when it is replaced
again that a 3-tab shingle roof be installed.
No one else wished to speak
Mr. Meche questioned in-kind replacements when the incorrect product is installed, and the applicant is seeking an
approval after the fact. Mr. Pattison noted that any work requires an application and is up to the City and
Commission to follow through.
May 19, 2021, Page 6 of 9
VOTE: Mr. Cutting made a motion to approve the application after the fact. Mr. Pattison seconded the motion.
Mr. Martinez made an amendment to include collecting the product color name for the record. Mr. Cutting
seconded the amendment. Roll Call: Commissioners English, Norkun, Martinez, Meche, Pattison, Cutting, Joyce,
Spang were in favor and the motion so carried.
150A Federal Street
Clint Roques submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for installation of infrastructure on
public way associated with city-wide SiFi initiative
Documents & Exhibits
▪ Application: 5/5/21
▪ Photographs
Clint Roques and Linda Calnan, and Bill McGovern (Head of the Mayor’s panel) were present to discuss the
project.
Ms. Calnan stated that Salem has invited SiFi to bring a fiber infrastructure to Salem and Mayor Driscoll has given
them the go-ahead to move forward. There will be two network shelters, one at the high school and another at the
Bridge Street travel island and 25 network cabinets around Salem. They are proposing Cabinet 13 in the historic
district, and they met with the Assessor, City Council and City Engineer, and are proposing the location on a public
right of way next to St. James Church.
Mr. Clint stated that the cabinets are 48-inches-high and will sit on a 4-foot x 6-foot concrete pad. The concrete
chambers below will hold the fiber optic conduit with a 4’x6’ conc pad. Concrete chambers hold the fiber optic
conduit. This location was chosen because it meets the sidewalk clearance requirements, near the corner of Flint
and Federal Streets. It would be installed at the edge of the curb because the other side is private property. The
Commission requested the cabinet be located closer to Bridge Street but just outside the drip zone of the first tree.
Mr. Meche requested the timeline for this end of Salem. Ms. Calnan stated that the construction will take place in
early 2022.
Chair Spang asked where the fibers will go from this cabinet. Ms. Calnan replied that they will micro-trench down
both sides of the street, then lateral trenching to the edge of the right of way between the City owned property to the
residents right of way. Chair Spang noted that residents requesting would need to submit applications when the
fiber needs to come above ground. Ms. Calnan noted that over 600 residents have pre-registered.
Mr. Joyce asked if the cabinet could be painted. Ms. Calnan replied no, due to thermal dynamics Mr. Joyce asked
if the cabinet will be hot to the touch. Ms. Calnan replied no, however; a fan inside the cabinet will keep the fibers
cool and will sound like a small air conditioner.
Public Comment: No one else wished to speak.
VOTE: Mr. Joyce made a motion to approve with the intention to move the box as close to the tree drip line as
feasible. Mr. Pattison seconded the motion. Roll Call: Commissioners English, Norkun, Martinez, Meche,
Pattison, Cutting, Joyce, Spang were in favor and the motion so carried.
May 19, 2021, Page 7 of 9
329 Essex Street
Ian Popken submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install fencing
Documents & Exhibits
▪ Application: 5/3/21
▪ Photographs
Mr. Popken was present to discuss the project.
Mr. Popken stated that for historic accuracy they are proposing a hand forged steel fence with tapered pickets rather
than sharp. The house has a lot of detail, and the proposed fence would be visually quiet. Cassidy Brothers will
create the fence which is the same design as at St. Michael’s in Marblehead. He noted that the house was
previously owned by the American Legion, which modified a window well for basement access. They could
reconstruct the granite step but would want to add 32-inch gates for access and the narrow gate size would not
require diagonal bracing for stability. The fence posts would still line up with each of the granite plinths as it was
originally intended and Cassidy Brothers recommend connections that allow for expansion and contraction rather
than welds, like the restored sections of Salem Common Fence.
Mr. Joyce asked if the fence would be textured or painted. Mr. Popken replied that the hand forged fence would be
painted with a 2-part epoxy from Sherwin Williams. Mr. Joyce stated that the simple fence style on such an ornate
house would look mismatched. Chair Spang noted that fences on structures of this style were the same or more
ornate than the building. Mr. Joyce agreed and noted that the earlier fence style as shown in historic photos is more
appropriate. Ms. Norkun agreed and suggested adding additional details. Mr. Popken suggested decorative posts.
Mr. Joyce suggested they take cues from the house or replace the bullet tips on the original posts. Mr. Popken
agreed to discuss the suggested adjustments with Cassidy Brothers.
Ms. Kelleher requested the proposed fence height and suggested the fence correlate with the granite at the entrance.
Mr. Popken replied approximately 48-inches-high. Mr. Meche noted he feels comfortable with the hybrid approach
that’s been proposed.
Chair Spang suggested a continuance to allow the applicant to amend the proposal and to provide revised drawings
or options of how the two styles would work together.
Mr. Cutting left the meeting at this time.
Public Comment: No one in the assembly wished to speak.
VOTE: Mr. Pattison made a motion to continue to the next regular meeting. Ms. Norkun seconded the motion.
Roll Call: Commissioners English, Norkun, Martinez, Meche, Pattison, Joyce, Spang were in favor and the motion
so carried.
18 Chestnut Street
Dorothy Kelleher submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace rear fencing
Documents & Exhibits
▪ Application: 5/3/21
▪ Photographs
Victoria Kelleher was present to discuss the project.
Ms. V. Kelleher stated that the 16-foot span of fence goes from the corner of her house to her mother’s house and
has a 10-foot opening. She is proposing to shift the opening in the fence and during the winter months the 4-foot
May 19, 2021, Page 8 of 9
fence section to the left would be removed to allow for off street parking. The current fence was installed in the
1970’s.
Chair Spang asked if the posts would be hidden or visible. Ms. V. Kelleher replied hidden with caps. Ms. Norkun
stated that a picketed fence makes the most sense and would match the neighboring fence to streamline the fence
styles in this area. She noted that a fence of this style doesn’t currently exist on Botts Court and she would not
support it but would support a sliding fence. Ms. V. Kelleher replied that her neighbor has a similar fence. Mr.
Pattison stated that they cannot trust that the fence sections will continue to be reinstalled and the applicant could
use the off-street parking throughout the year. Ms. V. Kelleher agreed to investigate a rolling or hinged fence
although they intend to use the space to maneuver vehicles, but it wouldn’t allow her mother to have the garden
space she desired.
Ms. Kelleher suggested a site visit while the applicant considers alternatives.
Public Comment:
Mary Usovicz, Botts Court. Wants to work with the applicant, the fence was taken down for construction but was
not reinstalled and she has seen two cars parked on the area in the winter. She wants to keep the aesthetic at Botts
Court.
Lou Sirianni, Botts Court. Submitted a letter to the Commission on May 17th stating that he would prefer the same
historic fence be replaced but to not allow for a removal of sections for parking to maintain the look of Botts Court.
The Commission agreed to a site visit at 9:15AM on 5/22/21.
VOTE: Mr. Meche made a motion to continue to the next regular meeting on June 2, 2021. Mr. Pattison seconded
the motion. Roll Call: Commissioners English, Norkun, Martinez, Meche, Pattison, Joyce, Spang were in favor and
the motion so carried.
384 Essex Street
Dana Barnard submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace a fence (after the fact)
Documents & Exhibits
▪ Application: 4/23/21
▪ Photographs
▪ Sketch by Boston Fence
Ms. Kelleher reported that she had asked the fence contractor if the installed fence could be modified to have the
fence sections continue over the posts but was told it was not possible. She noted that fences do not typically
require a building permit. Mr. Meche disagreed with the contractor’s statement that the sections could not be
brought forward. Chair Spang stated that the previous fence was not historic but with the fence half built it can be
adjusted to make it historically appropriate. Mr. Joyce noted that the lattice is visible in a Frank Cousins photo but
on the opposite side of the property it was installed as a privacy panel, above an existing picket fence.
The Commission agreed to a site visit on 5/22/21.
Public Comment:
Jay Famico, 380 Essex Street. Noted that the front fences are different on the left and right, the right-side fence is
not in-kind, the fence posts are not extending above the fence section by 6-inches, the span of fence closest to the
entrance of the district is above the ground not on the ground. He noted that the applicant has been told at previous
May 19, 2021, Page 9 of 9
meetings for requests that Commission review is required and this situation of the Commission having to review
work after the fact should not have occurred.
No one else in the assembly wished to speak.
VOTE: Mr. Meche made a motion to continue to the next regular meeting on June 2, 2021 with a site visit on
Saturday, May 22nd. Mr. Joyce seconded the motion. Roll Call: Commissioners English, Norkun, Martinez,
Meche, Pattison, Joyce, Spang were in favor and the motion so carried.
1 Chestnut Street
Janice Lebel submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for chimney caps (application under
consideration as a minor change)
Documents & Exhibits
▪ Application: 4/26/21
▪ Photographs
Ms. Kelleher stated that the application was processed under a minor change category and notices were sent to
abutters. No abutter objections were received. Therefore, the Certificate of Appropriateness was issued without
requiring a public hearing.
SHC acceptance of Preservation Restriction – Bowditch House, 9 North Street
Ms. Kelleher stated that the work is funded by MHC and the CPA and CPA funded projects are managed by the
local historic commission. A vote is needed to approve the preservation restriction on the Bowditch House.
VOTE: Mr. Meche made a motion to approve the preservation restriction. Mr. Pattison seconded the motion. Roll
Call: Commissioners English, Norkun, Martinez, Meche, Pattison, Joyce, Spang were in favor and motion carried.
Other Business
54 Jefferson Avenue: Ms. Kelleher stated that there was a request for a delay and she told the applicant not to
attend the meeting so the Commission could schedule a site visit. Chair Spang noted that the post and beam wood
framing may be the only things left of historic value and they are proposing to install a modular duplex on the site.
123 Federal Street: Ms. Kelleher stated that she spoke with the owner, and they are having difficulty with their
fence and are meeting with all the neighbors to resolve the issues that were created. Walpole Fence isn’t scheduled
to come to the site until early July.
VOTE: Mr. Martinez made a motion to extend the required submittal deadline to July 7, 2021. Mr. Pattison
seconded the motion. Roll Call: Commissioners Norkun, Martinez, Meche, Pattison, Joyce, Spang were in favor
and the motion so carried.
Adjournment
VOTE: Mr. Meche made a motion to adjourn. Mr. Pattison seconded the motion. Roll Call: Commissioners
English, Norkun, Martinez, Meche, Pattison, Joyce, Spang were in favor and the motion so carried.
The meeting adjourned at 10:30PM
Respectfully submitted,
Patti Kelleher
Community Development Planner
Agenda
Salem Historical Commission
98 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (978)
619-5685
Agenda
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, MAY 19, 2021
6:00 P.M.
*Via remote participation with instructions posted to www.salem.com, in accordance with Chapter 40C of the
Massachusetts General Laws and Governor Baker’s Emergency Order dated March 12, 2020.
Pursuant to Governor Baker’s March 12, 2020 Order Suspending Certain Provisions of the Open Meeting Law,
G.L. c. 30A, §18, and the Governor’s March 15, 2020 Order imposing strict limitation on the number of people
that may gather in one place, this public hearing of the City of Salem Historical Commission is being conducted
via remote participation. No in-person attendance of members of the public will be permitted, but the public
can listen and or view this meeting while in progress via the remote participation platform Zoom, through any
one of the following ways:
• Go to the website
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85103098334?pwd=QjJjQlVacGhvTGM2Zlh2LzNXYXBvQT09 or enter it into
your web browser to join the meeting; or
• Go to the website link https://zoom.us/join and enter Webinar ID#851 0309 8334 and enter Passcode
904618
▪ Dial a toll-free phone number 877-853-5257 (Toll Free). When prompted, enter Webinar ID #
851 0309 8334, enter Passcode 904618 and follow the instructions to join the meeting. Those only
dialing in will not have access to the direct video feed of the meeting but can follow along with the
project materials that will be available for download online prior to the meeting.
▪ The link to access project materials can be found at
https://cityofsalem1.sharepoint.com/:f:/s/HistoricalCommission/Eh3TpX6cmphHg9haaqqf8EsBL4wBT0
Un7xxeycZoIQj1qw?e=ZQdhmX
Members of the public attending this meeting virtually will be allowed to make comments if they wish to do
so, during the portion of the hearing designated for public comment. The meeting will be opened early at 5:45
pm to allow members of the public to test their audio. During portions of the meeting in which public
comment is permitted, members of the public who have “raised their hand” in Zoom will be called on to offer
comment. In order to raise a hand, members of the public using the Zoom computer or phone application may
click the “Raise Hand” button; members of the public dialing in may press “*9” to raise their hand to speak.
Thank you for your patience and understanding as we navigate this challenging situation for our community and
the world.
City of Salem Historical Commission
Agenda for May 19, 2021
Page 2 of 2
SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, MAY 19, 2021
6:00 P.M. (PLEASE NOTE NEW TIME)
MEETING AGENDA
1) 140 Derby Street – Patrick Shea – Certificate of Appropriateness – Paint colors – continuation
2) 7 North Pine Street – Stephanie Ellis – Certificate of Appropriateness – Exterior vents - continuation
3) 11 Orne Square – Pamela Coffin – Certificate of Appropriateness – Replace shed – continuation
4) 310 Lafayette Street – Kenneth and Monica Leisey – Certificate of Appropriateness – Replace windows
(after the fact) - continuation
5) 159 Derby Street – Paul Nathan - Certificate of Appropriateness – Install new accessible ramp –continuation
6) 23 River Street – Paschal Corrigan – Certificate of Appropriateness – Renovate building - continuation
7) 180 Derby Street – Brookhouse Home – Certificate of Appropriateness – Relocate electrical service
8) 26 Beckford Street – Sara Keddy - Certificate of Appropriateness – Architectural roof shingles (after the fact)
9) 150A Federal Street – Clint Roques – Certificate of Appropriateness – Installation of infrastructure on public
way associated with city-wide sifi initiative
10) 329 Essex Street – Ian Popken – Certificate of Appropriateness – Install fencing
11) 18 Chestnut Street – Dorothy Kelleher – Certificate of Appropriateness – Replace rear fencing
12) 384 Essex Street – Dana Barnard – Certificate of Appropriateness – Replace fence (after the fact)
13) 1 Chestnut Street – Janice Lebel – Certificate of Appropriateness – Chimney caps – Application under
consideration as a minor change
14) SHC acceptance of Preservation Restriction – Bowditch House, 9 North Street
15) Other Business: Minutes; Violations; and Correspondence
Persons requiring auxiliary aids and services for effective communication such as sign language interpreter, an
assistive listening device, or print material in digital format or a reasonable modification in programs, services,
policies, or activities, may contact the City of Salem ADA Coordinator as soon as possible and no less than
2 business days before the meeting, program, or event.
Know Your Rights Under the Open Meeting Law, M.G.L. c. 30A §18-25, and
City Ordinance Sections 2-2028 through 2-203
Get email alerts for Salem
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.