City Council

• 4th of July presents safety challenges • Use of illegal fireworks before, during and after the 4th of July • Noise, animal impacts, PTSI residents, risk of injury, etc. • Fire hazards • Large, unruly gatherings • Increased alcohol use • Expansive education, prevention and enforcement operations annually • Does not stop rampant illegal fireworks use • This is not stoppable, only reduceable • Average number of fireworks-related calls for service on July 4th • San Mateo: 42 • East Palo Alto: 96 • South San Francisco: 107 • Daly City: 48 • None of these Cities allow safe and sane fireworks • None of these Cities engage in broad enforcement • Generally do NOT respond to fireworks complaints • Pacifica: 93 • Only other SM County City allowing safe and sane fireworks use/sales • Enforcement efforts similar to San Bruno • All Police Department personnel ordered to work • Robust Incident Action Plan created and approved • Joint Fire/Police PSA created and disseminated • Fireworks Safety Postcard to all residents • Safety meetings with all booth operators • Educational flyers provided with every fireworks sale • Informational warning notices to all City Facilities • Advance police contact at known violation locations • Use of data to focus resource deployment • Dedicated enforcement details prior to 4th • All SBPD personnel ordered to work • 47 staff (Officers, Dispatchers, Clerks, CSOs) • 35 sworn and 12 non-sworn • Many worked 16 consecutive hours • All beats staffed as usual, plus dedicated enforcement units deployed • Marked and unmarked units • Uniformed and plain clothes personnel • Undercover surveillance • Drones/UAS • Dedicated Fire Department Staff • Dedicated Parks Department Staff • Dedicated Public Works Department Staff • SBPD handled 252 calls for service on the 4th of July • 3 fewer than in 2023 • Peak activity period – 8:30pm to 11:30pm • 114 calls were fireworks related • 30 fewer than last year • Most reports vague and marginally workable • Officers must “on-view” violations to cite • Observationally… • Illegal fireworks heavy this year but over a condensed period of time • Fewer unruly gatherings/parties than typical • $1,000 Administrative Citation • Citing Officer must directly observe a specific person committing a specific violation • Officer must then safely detain the violator • Municipal Code infraction doesn’t justify compromised safety • Violator must be cited, not physically arrested • Only evidence in plain view can be seized • Resident-provided video can help identify suspects, but cannot replace “in presence” legal requirement • Person(s) in control of a gathering can be cited • Must prove knowledge (warning)  2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Admin Cites 15 26 25 17 38 21 25 22 11 Arrests 0 4 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 • 15 Administrative Citations issued this year • All cites issued between 8:40pm and 10:55pm (condensed period) • Of the 15 people cited, 8 were San Bruno residents • 1 social host ordinance citation (new code) • About 40 pounds of live illegal fireworks seized  Department Nature Cost Police Department Public Service Announcement (PD & FD) $385 Community Services Additional Staff/Equipment on the 4th $5,005 Fire Department Fire Marshal Administrative and Inspection Hours $2,986 Fire Department 4th of July Staffing and Logistics $13,699 Police Department 4th of July Staffing and Logistics $30,639 Police Department Pre and Post 4th Education and Enforcement / Logistics $15,795 Public Works Cleanup Costs (Labor & Equipment) TBD (est. $8k) Total $76,513  4th of July Staffing • 1 Additional BC • All fire prevention staff on duty • Education / Enforcement • 1 Extra ALS Type I Engine Company • (3 Engines, 1 Truck in the city) 11 Calls for Service • San Bruno Fire Department handled 28 calls for service on the 4th of July a slight increase from last year • Peak activity period – 8:30pm to 12pm • Twelve calls were fireworks related (12) • No structure fires 12  MIXED-USE PROJECT AT 111 SAN BRUNO AVENUE WEST CITY COUNCIL MICHAEL SMITH JULY 9, 2024 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENDA I. Background II. Overview III. Analysis IV. Recommendation 2 BACKGROUND 3 BACKGROUND Location: 111 San Bruno Avenue West Owner/Applicant: San Bruno Development, LLC Lot Area: 0.41 acres (18,025 sf) General Plan Land Use: Transit Oriented Development Existing Zoning: P-D BACKGROUND 2018 Project Approval • 111 San Bruno Ave. and 761-767 Huntington Ave. (adjacent) • 62 units • 0.61 acres • Rezoned from C to P-D • Development partnership fell through OVERVIEW 6  OVERVIEW  Five-story, 67,873 sq. ft. mixed-use building on 0.41 acres  46 housing units (7 BMR units)  2,670 sq. ft. ground floor commercial space  48 parking spaces  3.8 FAR  Rezone 0.61 acres from P- D to TOD-1   Entitlements  Zoning Map Amendment (P-D to TOD-1)  Tentative Tract Map OVERVIEW  Density Bonus Request  Architectural Review Permit  Affordable Housing Plan OVERVIEW • Project includes removing a traffic lane on Huntington New bulb-out Ave. • Enhanced sidewalk and bulb out at the corner Project Site  OVERVIEW • The project design is nearly identical to the 2018 approval ANALYSIS 11 ANALYSIS  50% Density Bonus  Waivers/Concessions  Upper story stepback  Setback  FAR  Bicycle parking  Garage entrance setback ANALYSIS  AB 2097  Exempt from parking  ½ mile of transit  Parking provided is voluntary  Proposed Parking  46 parking spaces in mechanical lifts  2 parking spaces at grade  No commercial parking ANALYSIS  Environmental Review  No potential impacts not previously identified in TCP EIR  Applicable TCP EIR mitigation measures included as conditions of approval  Exempt from additional CEQA review ANALYSIS  Zoning Map Amendment  P-D to TOD-1  Match neighborhood pattern PUBLIC COMMENT One email from a neighbor who thinks the project does not provide enough parking. RECOMMENDATION 17  RECOMMENDATION • Introduce an Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map to rezone two properties from Planned Development District (P-D) to Medium Density, Mixed-Use District (TOD-1); • Adopt a Resolution Conditionally Approving a Tentative Tract Map, Density Bonus Request, Architectural Review Permit, and Affordable Housing Plan for 111 San Bruno Avenue West 18 19 ENABLING ACTIONS TO INITIATE PLACING A GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND MEASURE ON THE NOVEMBER 2024 BALLOT Nick Pegueros City Council Chief Financial Officer July 9, 2024 OBJECTIVE  Adopt a Resolution of Necessity  Introduce an Ordinance Submitting General Obligation Bond (G.O. Bond) Measure to Voters 2  BACKGROUND Date Action May 9, 2023 City Council Priority Initiative to explore a 2024 Revenue Measure December 12, 2023 City Council established an Ad Hoc Committee (Salazar/Hamilton) to explore a revenue measure February 27, 2024 Direction to pursue a General Obligation Bond analysis May 21, 2024 Committee recommended presenting results of the 2024 Community Priorities Survey to Council June 11, 2024 Council received survey results and directed that the item return to City Council July 9 & Enabling actions to place a measure on the November July 23, 2024 ballot 3 RESOLUTION Indicating that public interest and necessity demand the issuance of the G.O. Bond to finance the authorized improvements.  Repairing, replacing, and improving the deteriorating stormwater drain system to prevent system failure, flooding, water pollution and sinkholes,  Repairing and improving the City streets, and  Constructing and upgrading fire stations to ensure rapid emergency response, accommodate modern fire-fighting and life-saving emergency medical equipment and allow the stations to function during earthquakes and other natural disasters 4 ORDINANCE  Identifies the objects and purposes of the Bonds, the estimated cost of the improvements to be financed, accountability requirements applicable to the Bonds, and related matter  Section 5 – Authorized uses  Section 6 – Estimated cost of improvements 5 NEXT STEPS July 23, 2024:  Ordinance adoption on July 23rd  Adoption of Resolution Placing Measure on Ballot – approving the 75-word ballot measure label and other particulars concerning the conduct of the election 6 RECOMMENDATION  Adopt a Resolution of Necessity  Introduce an Ordinance Submitting G.O. Bond Measure to Voters 7 QUESTIONS 8  ORDINANCE: SAN BRUNO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 2.36 (PERSONNEL SYSTEM) City Council Regular Meeting Nick Pegueros July 9, 2024 Administrative Services Director / CFO AGENDA Objective and Background Proposed Amendment to Municipal Code Section 2.36 Tonight’s Recommended Action Questions 2  OBJECTIVE  Consider Introducing, Reading by Title Only and Waving a Further Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Bruno Amending San Bruno Municipal Code Chapter 2.36 (Personnel System) 3 BACKGROUND  In 2021, City Council authorized the dissolvement of Personnel Board  Streamlined and enhanced the efficiencies of personnel related operations  Municipal Code Section 2.36 (Personnel System) was updated  Update intended to include Personnel Officer authorized to develop and adopt Personnel Rules 4 BACKGROUND  Section 2.36 updated  Current version of the Personnel Rules and Regulations is dated 1958  Amendments approved periodically during subsequent decades and most recently in 2007 and 2021 respectively  Need to update positions listed 5 PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.36 (PERSONNEL SYSTEM) 6 PROPOSED AMENDMENT  Amend 2.36.020  Update the staff positions that are exempt from competitive service  Amend 2.36.050  Remove duplicative wording to clarify that City Manager is Personnel Officer and has authority to develop and adopt Personnel Rules and Regulations 7 PROPOSED AMENDMENT  Clarifies intended action from 2021  No change to City Council authority  Compensation Plan or Budget Staffing Plan 8 TONIGHT’S RECOMMENDED ACTION  Consider Introducing, Reading by Title Only and Waving a Further Reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Bruno Amending San Bruno Municipal Code Chapter 2.36 (Personnel System) 9 QUESTIONS 10