Planning Board

PLANNING BOARD MINUTES ( FINAL) THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2021 6:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER : Mark Torpey, Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. SALUTE TO THE FLAG: PRESENT : Mark Torpey, Chair; Ruth Horton; Kerry Mayo; Justin Doty; Al Dal Pos; LATE ARRIVAL : Al DalPos arrived at 6:03 P.M. ABSENT: Todd Fabozzi STAFF: Susan Barden, Principal Planner, City of Saratoga Springs Vince DeLeonardis, City Attorney ANNOUNCEMENT OF RECORDING OF PROCEEDING: The proceedings of this meeting are being recorded for the benefit of the secretary. Because the minutes are not a verbatim record of the proceedings, the minutes are not a word-for-word transcript of the recording. A. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES: Approval of meeting minutes was deferred to the end of the meeting. B. POSSIBLE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS: NOTE: The intent of a consent agenda is to identify any application that is “approvable” without need for further evaluation or discussion. If anyone wished to further discuss any proposed consent agenda item, then that item would be pulled from the “consent agenda” and dealt with individually. C. APPLICATIONS UNDER CONSIDERATION: 1. #20200805 SAXTON SUBDIVISION, 34 Glenmore Avenue, Final Plat Review of a proposed two-lot subdivision to provide for one new single-family residential lot in the Urban Residential (UR-2) District. BACKGROUND: -ZBA considered the area variance on 08/23/21. The ZBA initiated coordinated SEQRA review and requested an Advisory Opinion from the Planning Board on the requested variance from the minimum lot width requirements -Planning Board issued a favorable Advisory Opinion to the ZBA on 09/09/21. -Planning Board issued a Negative SEQRA Declaration on 09/09/21. -ZBA granted an area variance on 09/27/21, from the average minimum lot width requirement from 60 ft. to 58.39 ft. -Revised application and plans submitted on November 12, 2021. SEQRA: Proposed project is an unlisted action. ZBA & Planning Board are involved agencies. Coordination initiated by ZBA on 08/23/21 and the ZBA proactively deferred Lead Agency Status to the Planning Board. Planning Board accepted Lead Agency Status and issued a Negative SEQRA Declaration on 09/09/21. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated this application appeared before the Planning Board initially on December 10, 2020. The public hearing has been re-noticed for this evening. The Chair stated there were two questions regarding this application an existing streetlight and street tree to remain. In any subdivision the requirement is for the installation of sidewalks, in this instance this requirement is inconsistent with the neighborhood. Typically, what we provide to be fair and equitable is a fee in lieu of. We look at areas of the city where the application of a sidewalk would stitch together somewhere else where it would make sense. Applicant: Jacqueline Saxton Ms. Saxton stated she objects to the fee in lieu of. In this case the City of Saratoga Springs determined that there would not be any sidewalks on that side of the street when they agreed with the West Way project of widening Glenmore Avenue. The city gave up its right of way on that side and they would have at that time taken property all along Glenmore Avenue by eminent domain. They did not do it. They determined they would widen Glenmore and have the developer put in curbs but no sidewalks. This was done years ago. Vincent DeLeonardis stated we would need to confirm with DPW that sidewalks were not indicated in this area. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated the contingencies for the subdivision would be for the existing streetlight and tree to remain. Curbing to be reinstalled following construction. The Chair stated following a conversation with DPW regarding sidewalks or fee in lieu of, this can be managed via an Administrative Action if necessary. PUBLIC HEARING: Mark Torpey, Chair, opened the public hearing at 6:09 P.M. Mark Torpey, Chair asked if anyone in the audience wished to comment on this application. None heard. Mark Torpey, Chair, closed the public hearing at 6:10 P.M. City of Saratoga Springs – Planning Board November 18, 2021 - Page 2 of 12 Jason Doty made a motion in the matter of the application of the Saxton Two Lot Subdivision, 34 Glenmore Avenue be approved with the conditions as noted by the Chair. Ruth Horton seconded the motion. Mark Torpey, Chair, asked if there was any further discussion. None heard. VOTE: Mark Torpey, Chair, in favor; Ruth Horton, in favor; Kerry Mayo, in favor; Jason Doty, in favor; Al DalPos, in favor MOTION PASSES : 5-0 2. #20210307 THORNTON FINAL SUBDIVISION, 215 Grand Avenue, Final Plat Review of a two-lot subdivision in the Urban Residential -2 (UR-2) District. Mark Torpey, Chair, provided the following background information. BACKGROUND: -Two lot subdivision previously considered by the Planning Board in 2011. Denied March 12, 2012. -Planning Board reviewed sketch plan on November 21, 2019. -Final Plat review on April 22, 2021. -ZBA requested an Advisory Opinion from the Planning Board pertaining to the area variance from the minimum lot requirements to provide for a proposed two-lot subdivision on July 12, 2021. -Planning Board issued a Favorable Advisory Opinion to the ZBA on July 29, 2021. -ZBA granted area variance on August 9, 2021. PUBLIC HEARING: Mark Torpey, Chair, opened the public hearing at 6:10 P.M. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated there are several items since the applicant’s last appearance before the Board. DPS has had an opportunity to review the intersection and felt there was no significant impact relative to the project on any design work that is already in place. Applicant: Patrician & Daniel Thornton Agent: Tonya Yasenchak, Engineering America Ms. Yasenchak stated we do not have any changes relative to the subdivision itself. There are engineering notes which need to be added onto the plan, such as noting that the sidewalk proposed is on private property and minor notes. Mark Torpey, Chair, reviewed items which are relevant to the application. Fencing along Birch Street, and to maintain proper site distance the fence should be moved back 15 ft. from the roadway. The sidewalk would continue along Birch Street. Easement language for sidewalk on private property to the satisfaction of the City Attorney. The home itself will be facing and fronting on Birch to be consistent with the neighborhood. A new tree planting on Grand Avenue. Discussion with DPS to consider signage indicating a driveway in the area. Sidewalk to continue across the driveway as well. City of Saratoga Springs – Planning Board November 18, 2021 - Page 3 of 12 Mr. Yasenchak questioned the request for signage indicating a driveway to be further discussed with DPS. SEQRA: The proposed project is an Unlisted Action. Part I of the Short EAF has been submitted as is accurate. Letter from SHPO has been provided. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated the Board will review Part II of the Short SEQRA form. SEQRA DECISION : Ruth Horton stated based upon the information provided by the applicant in Part I of the SEQR Short Environmental Assessment Form, and analysis of the information provided and presented in Part II of the SEQR Short Environmental Assessment Form, I make a motion for a SEQR negative declaration since the project will not result in any large and important impacts and, therefore, is one that will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. Kerry Mayo seconded the motion. Mark Torpey, Chair, asked if there was any further discussion. None heard. VOTE: Mark Torpey, Chair, in favor; Ruth Horton, in favor; Kerry Mayo, in favor; Jason Doty, in favor; Al DalPos, in favor MOTION PASSES : 5-0 PUBLIC HEARING: Mark Torpey, Chair, stated the public hearing was opened and remains open. Mark Torpey, Chair, asked if anyone in the audience wished to comment on this application. Doreen Couch, 216 Washington Street. She voiced concerns regarding sidewalks down Washington Street. She is also concerned regarding the high-water table and the plans for the new house. Mark Torpey, Chair, explained the issues regarding sidewalk all the way down to Washington Street and the fee in lieu of stipulation which is often imposed on new development. Regarding the storm water and drainage, the engineers on the project will ensure that no additional water issues will arise with this project. The Planning Board has no purview over the design of the home. Mark Torpey, Chair, closed the public hearing at 6:30 P.M. Jason Doty made a motion in the matter of the application of the Thornton Subdivision, 215 Grand Avenue, be approved with the conditions as noted by the Chair. Al DalPos seconded the motion. Mark Torpey, Chair, asked if there was any further discussion. None heard, VOTE: City of Saratoga Springs – Planning Board November 18, 2021 - Page 4 of 12 Mark Torpey, Chair, in favor; Ruth Horton, in favor; Kerry Mayo, in favor; Jason Doty, in favor; Al DalPos, in favor MOTION PASSES : 5-0 3. #20211113 SMILEY-BRACKETT COTTAGE, 166 Excelsior Avenue, Consideration of an Advisory Opinion to the City Council for Zoning Text Amendment to add the property to the list of City Landmarks in 7.4.18. Applicant: Samantha Bosshart, Executive Director, Saratoga Springs Preservation Foundation Ms. Bosshart stated the Saratoga Springs Preservation has petitioned the City Council to allow the Smiley-Brackett Cottage on Excelsior Avenue to become a local landmark. A visual of the site was provided which abuts the Spring Run Trail. It was part of the Excelsior Spring Park. Ms. Bosshart provided a history of the ownership of the property by Sarah Smiley and her tireless efforts to preach and speak before congregations of denominations across the country and abroad. She spent her summer months in study in her cottage here in Saratoga Springs. She was controversial for insisting that women could study the scriptures themselves and founded a home Bible Study program for women. She authored books which are still published today. Upon her death in 1917 the cottage was left to the Society for the Home Study of Holy Scripture and Church History a group she founded to promote religious study by mail. Ms. Smiley built the house in the Gothic Revival Style in 1872. We have very few Gothic Revival houses in the City of Saratoga Springs. None which except for this one has a rural setting, which is where this type of home was intended to be set. In 1921 Charles Brackett purchased the cottage. He authored novels and become a drama critic, and screenwriter. He won academy awards and an Oscar for Lifetime Achievement in 1958. Mr. Brackett built accessory structures on the site. Prior to his death the property was sold to Daniel Jewett. The Saratoga Springs Preservation Foundation has listed the property on its endangered property list in 1998. For the past 20 years the Foundation has attempted to assist the current owner. The Foundation has also attempted to seek a Determination of Eligibility for individual listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The condition of the property continues to deteriorate and there is concern that the heirs of the current owner will not have an interest in preserving the structures. It is currently not located in a Historic District or an Architectural Review District, therefore, there is no review for demolition or new construction. Ms. Bosshart provided the criteria for inclusion on the National Register and the property qualifies. The Foundation is before the DRC to seek a local landmark designation for this property. This property has history that is worth saving and needs to be protected long into the future. We are hopeful that the Planning Board will support these efforts. Ruth Horton made a motion for a positive Advisory Opinion to the City Council given the project comports with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with Zoning. Al DalPos seconded the motion. Mark Torpey, Chair, asked if there was any further discussion. None heard. VOTE: Mark Torpey, Chair, in favor; Ruth Horton, in favor; Kerry Mayo, in favor; Jason Doty, in favor; Al DalPos, in favor MOTION PASSES : 5-0 City of Saratoga Springs – Planning Board November 18, 2021 - Page 5 of 12  4. #20210932 25 LAKE/38 HIGH ROCK AVENUE SUBDIVISION, 25 Lake Avenue/38 High Rock Avenue, Final Plat Review of a two-lot subdivision in the Transect -6 Urban Core District. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated the applicant is proposing a two-lot subdivision. This area is the outdoor seating area for Jacob and Anthony’s and the request is to carve that area into a separate parcel. Applicant: Turf Parillo, LLC Agent: Mike Ingersoll, Matt Brobston, LA Group Mr. Ingersoll stated Mr. Parillo is a partial owner of both properties. What we are attempting to achieve here is one of the two ownership entities no longer wishes to own the outdoor patio. We are proposing a two-lot subdivision creating a new lot that would be .041 acres. Lot #1 the Hampton Suites would be reduced to 1.046 acres. The area to be subdivided is the outdoor area operated by Jacob and Anthony’s. The subdivision is to separate the ownership of that area from the Hampton Inn parcel. A visual of the site was provided for the Board noting the area in question. PUBLIC HEARING: Mark Torpey, Chair, opened the public hearing at 7:00 P.M. The following public comments were received by the Board. -Emailed comments from Betty Spinelli, 38 High Rock, received 11/17/21. -Emailed comments from Joe Stanek, 38 High Rock, received 11/17/21. -Emailed comments from Barb and Steve Ferraro, 38 High Rock, received 11/17/21. -Emailed comments from Sally and Keith Manz, 38 High rock, received 11/17/21. Mark Torpey, Chair, asked if anyone in the audience wished to comment on this application. None heard. Mark Torpey, Chair, closed the public hearing at 7:01 P.M. SEQRA: The proposed project is an Unlisted Action. Part I of the Short EAF has been submitted as is accurate. Planning Board appears to be the only involved agency. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated the Board will review Part II of the Short SEQRA form. SEQRA DECISION : Ruth Horton stated based upon the information provided by the applicant in Part I of the SEQR Short Environmental Assessment Form, and analysis of the information provided and presented in Part II of the SEQR Short Environmental Assessment Form, I make a motion for a SEQR negative declaration since the project will not result in any large and important impacts and, therefore, is one that will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. Kerry Mayo seconded the motion. Mark Torpey, Chair, asked if there was any further discussion. None heard. VOTE: City of Saratoga Springs – Planning Board November 18, 2021 - Page 6 of 12 Mark Torpey, Chair, in favor; Ruth Horton, in favor; Kerry Mayo, in favor; Jason Doty, in favor; Al DalPos, in favor MOTION PASSES : 5-0 Mark Torpey, Chair, stated we will now move onto the subdivision portion of the application. There are no specific requirements here. No city departmental comments. Jason Doty made a motion in the matter of the application of the 25 Lake Avenue/38 High Rock Avenue, two lot subdivision at 25 Lake Avenue/38 High Rock Avenue be approved as presented. Al DalPos seconded the motion. Mark Torpey, Chair, asked if there was any further discussion. None heard, VOTE: Mark Torpey, Chair, in favor; Ruth Horton, in favor; Kerry Mayo, in favor; Jason Doty, in favor; Al DalPos, in favor MOTION PASSES : 5-0 7:03 P.M. The Board Recessed. 7:10 P.M. The Board Reconvened. 5. #20210924 74 MITCHELL SITE PLAN, 74 Mitchell Street, Site Plan Review for a private club/recreation area that includes a member pool and cabana and associated site work in the Urban Residential -3 (UR-3) District. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated this is an application for a Site Plan Review for a private club/recreation area. The Planning Board has reviewed this project on multiple occasions to date and provided the following background information. BACKGROUND: -The Planning Board considered on June 24, 2021, a sketch plan review of a residential subdivision including Reconfiguration of existing lots resulting in 8 lots in the Urban Residential-3 (UR-3) District. -Lot line adjustment approved administratively on September 3,2021. -Planning Board issues a SEQRA Negative Declaration on October 28, 2021. -Planning Board approved a two-lot subdivision and issued a Special Use Permit for a private club/civic club on October 28, 2021. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated the applicant will provide a visual overview of the project for Board as well as the considerable number of members of the audience interested in this application. Applicant: Jay Hanley, Builder/Owner Agent: Mike Ingersoll, Matt Brobston, LA Group; Matthew Jones, Attorney – Jones Stieves Mr. Jones stated this project has been before the Board on prior occasions as noted by the Chair, receiving approvals for a Lot Line Adjustment, Sketch Plan Review, Special Use Permit and tonight the applicant is looking for Site Plan Approval for a project located off Union Avenue, Snyder Lane, City of Saratoga Springs – Planning Board November 18, 2021 - Page 7 of 12 and Mitchell Street. The Saratoga County Planning Board referral has indicated no significant countywide or intercommunity impact. The issue before the Board this evening is Site Plan review for a project located at 74 Mitchell Street and is the private club/recreation area proposed for this project which include the pool and the cabana. Mr. Ingersoll provided a visual of the project site and parcels and the existing conditions totaling .217 acres which includes 4 lots on Union Avenue and 3 lots on Mitchell Street. One amenity parcel which the applicant is looking to create a pool and a small club cabana for the future homeowners. Visual views of the amenity space were provided for the Board noting all approvals have been granted. A Site Plan Review is required for the private/civic club which is an open-air pavilion/cabana about 1,000 sq. ft. in size. The concept being proposed and in this area was provided for the Boards review from different views as well as the ability for residents to access the pool and residences via a common alley or pathway. Security fencing for the residents in the area will be provided. The curb cuts along Union will be removed so the access will be off the rear. Sidewalks will be installed on Mitchell Street and Union Avenue. A visual of the amenity area layout plan was provided to the Board. A utility plan was provided. There is no storm water infrastructure on Snyder Lane but what is being proposed with the civic space and landscaping would manage that issue. A visual rendering of the pool and private civic club was provided. Mr. Ingersoll spoke to offsite streetscape design and provided examples of the type of stone proposed for the wall area surrounding the pool/cabana/clubhouse. He also introduced to the Board a new permeable pavement which is proposed for this area. Snyder Lane will remain a public access alley and will be widened to a width of 20 ft. to include pedestrian walkways on both sides of the drive lanes. Comments from Public Safety were received noting the 20 ft. width of the roadway is acceptable which will allow for two-way traffic, and snow storage as well. Comments were also received from Department of Public Works and their recommendations will be adhered to. We have no objections to these comments and will be included in the final Site Plan. There is a section of the corner of Union and East Avenue which will be deeded as greenspace following legal logistic for the site Mark Torpey, Chair, stated there is no requirement for the applicant to provide civic space for this project. The applicant has agreed to add this civic space because it punctuates the corner by the track and adds to the track development. Should this acquisition not occur Stewarts will continue to own that property, and the applicant will return before this Board for a modification of the Special Use Permit. The Planning Board does not have purview over the type of homes to be built that comes under the authority of the DRC. Mark Torpey, Chair, asked if there were any questions or comments from the Board. None heard. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated normally for a site plan we do not have a public hearing it is not required. However, there are people who wish to comment on this application. The Chair will allow for comments, keeping in mind the purview of the Board. PUBLIC COMMENT: Adam Fitch, 8 Cider mill Way, Saratoga Springs. Mr. Fitch stated he is a long-time business owner in Saratoga Springs and for the last 7 years he and his brothers are the owners of Kings Tavern. Our customers and patrons are family and we are community oriented. Our concerns with this project are our deliveries which most times are 18 wheelers and will present a problem. We have parked cars on this vacant lot for the last 5 years in a contract with Stewarts. Parking and deliveries are a real issue for our small family-owned business. We live and feed our families off Kings’ Tavern. This project is being built by a builder who does not even live in Saratoga. They are from Nantucket. Saratoga is a fantasy fun land for City of Saratoga Springs – Planning Board November 18, 2021 - Page 8 of 12 people who do not live here year around, come to enjoy the track, have millions of dollars, and do not care about the community. If this project does move forward, we would like to have the ability to have a loading zone on Union Avenue. Restricting deliveries to certain hours is impossible especially following the pandemic. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated a portion of the alley is being widened to a width of 20 ft. with this project but Snyder Alley is still accessible for the public and would not change with this project. There may be additional benefit widening the entire width of the alley as opposed to how it exists currently. We have been collaborating with the applicant to avoid a gated community atmosphere, to have it more accessible to the public, as well as with DPW. Discussion ensued among the Board regarding Snyder Lane, the accessibility currently, what is being proposed and the impacts on the residents whose properties abut Snyder Lane. Mark Torpey, Chair, questioned staff if DPW been consulted regarding providing the continuous 20 ft. width to extend beyond this project. Susan Barden, Principal Planner stated she was unsure if they were asked. The plan that they reviewed was the portion of the alley which abuts the lots that front on Mitchell. This would be an opportunity to extend the alley all the way down so that it is consistent in its entirety. We can provide the information for them to review. James Bennington, 20 Hillside Avenue, Saratoga Springs. As a patron of Kings’ Tavern, we park in the Stewart’s lot. If the parking is limited, it will impact the taverns business. James Morrill, Saratoga Springs resident. Somehow, someway a compromise must be made. Let us hope we can grow responsibly and work together to help a small business owner as well as the future development of the area. Chris Stewart, Saratoga Springs Fire Department. I participate in the charitable work with the firefighters. Kings Tavern contributes about $65,000 a year in charitable contributions. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated what he is looking for is additional information regarding DPW’s thoughts in terms of broadening Snyder Lane making it consistent all the way, making it more beneficial for all property owners along the alley. This would be a win, win for everyone. I would like to obtain DPW’s opinion prior to deciding. Regarding Stewart’s parcel, it is outside our control. Ruth Horton questioned if Stewart’s or the applicant or the new owner accept this issue regarding parking for this small business owner be addressed. Mr. Jones stated they have been in discussions. Construction will not commence for months. We are not in immediate need for the use of the parcel which Kings Tavern uses for parking. This lease can be terminated with 30 days’ notice. The applicant would continue the lease for parking. The pinch point for the lane behind Kings’ and we do not propose to do anything in this area. A discussion with DPW to see if an action can be taken on the remainder of Snyder Lane is worth pursuing. We are willing to work regarding both areas of concern and makes sense for us to do it. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated his feeling in deferring a decision would provide the Board an opportunity if DPW is interested in pursuing this. Kerry Mayo questioned what the parking situation is on East Avenue. Would the city consider providing double sided parking on East Avenue? City of Saratoga Springs – Planning Board November 18, 2021 - Page 9 of 12 Mark Torpey, Chair, stated parking regulations are beyond our purview. The Chair does not feel comfortable voting on this application this evening. We will hold off deciding on this application until our next meeting scheduled for December 9th. 6. #20210755 269 BROADWAY SITE PLAN, 269 Broadway, Site Plan review of a six- story multi-tenant commercial building and associate site work in the Transect-6 Urban Core (T-6) District. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated application has appeared before the Board previously and provided the following background information. BACKGROUND: -Sketch plan discussion on April 8, 2021. -The Planning Board discussed SEQRA review on July 15, 2021, then adjourned the application. Discussion included request for an Advisory Opinion from the DRC (suggested a balloon float), change in the civic space/amenities, ventilation from the building, DPS/DPW review the traffic study. -Site Plan application including updated traffic study and geotechnical report; DRC Advisory Opinion also provided on August 4, 2021. -Recent submission, November 17, 2021, includes revised FEAF Part I, parking study, response to DPS comments, Revised layout plan. -Saratoga County Planning Board reviewed application – referral response received on October 8, 2021, No Significant Countywide or Intercommunity Impact with comment. Applicant: 269 Broadway, LLC Agent: Mike Toohey, Attorney; Mike Roman, Architect – C2 Design Group, Walt Whitman, MJ Engineering; Chad Snyder, Traffic Engineer Mr. Toohey provided a visual of the proposed building as allowed per all the zoning regulations. We have previously provided to the Board studies regarding Mass and Scale. This property is unique as it has 10,000 sq. ft. to the north of it that will not be constructed upon and will remain as it currently exists. It has 30% of its project site which is not being developed. We completed a drone analysis completed regarding the scale of the building and the scale of the building will be like the condominiums and other building in this section of the city. One of the concerns voiced were parking and traffic. We have spoken with the city and experts in this field. We have also made modifications to the building regarding DRC comments concerning access to the building and the front of the building. Mr. Whitman provided a visual and reviewed the project information. A permanent easement has been obtained from the Diocese of Albany so that we can use and utilize the 38ft. to the south of the building. We cannot place a structure on the land, but we are attempting to increase the footprint of the property so that the mass and scale of the building fits better on the land we are proposing. This additional property will now add an additional 10,085 square feet. This means the width of the property has been increased. The total combined lot size is 32,750 square feet. This allows us to have a significant amount of public space. There will be no parking spaces on the site to be used by St. Peter’s but there will be sidewalks and green space from Broadway to Hamilton City of Saratoga Springs – Planning Board November 18, 2021 - Page 10 of 12 Street. This will also provide a pedestrian portal, allowing pedestrian traffic from the west of Hamilton Street onto Broadway. What we have attempted to do is introduce space for public access and additional civic space. Our current utilization of the land is significantly less than the neighbor across the street. Mr. Whitman also provided a visual of the building plans and design considerations, noting the primary entranceway is off Broadway. The secondary access will be on the south side with an ADA ramp in this location as well as the cross connectivity. The traffic study was performed during the pandemic. DOT issued a memo during that time to guide design in August of 2020. This was the basis of our traffic counts. We performed our counts in May of 2021 in the prime AM and PM hours, averaged those volume counts and compared them to the historical data we had in 2019. In doing so he average AM peak factor is 1.73 and the PM peak factor is 1.76. They are close. We determined the 1.75 for our analysis. No comments from Chazen or DPS. This analysis provided us with modifications to help mitigate this for the site. We will direct traffic from out of our site to the north with signage noting no left turn. Pavement markings are also proposed. In the loading area to provide the 20 ft. requirement distance from the crosswalk, pavement markings indicate a loading zone. Road improvements proposed at the intersection of Hamilton and West Circular a right hand turn only lane will be added. Hamilton and Congress intersection will be a signal timing change. We also reviewed the parking analysis. Mr. Roman, Architect spoke of the changes incorporated into the design since the last appearance before the Board and address the DRC comments. Mr. Roman reviewed the building design noting the change in the front elevation ground floor is at grade with Broadway. We are bringing in punched windows, the metal pane and introducing more brick. The front top portion is pushed back about 8 ft. This allows the columns to come up and the roof edge which is held back and defines the roof. As you walk into the space you will be taken down into the retail area, or into the main lobby which will take you to the upper floors. This entrance will also be ADA accessible. We have maintained the outdoor seating at the second-floor level. Mr. Roman provided views of all elevations. Nothing has changed with the civic space. We have simplified the glass to provide more transparency. These revisions were submitted to Amanda today and addresses the comments of the DRC regarding the main entry having more presence on Broadway. This change is one of the bigger concerns of the DRC. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated we have received feedback from DPW. All the issues DPW raised have been addressed. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated we will allow for a short public comment period. Carol Obloy, 268 Broadway. The presence of this building only exacerbates the traffic and parking issues which currently exist on Broadway and Hamilton Streets. These are two lane roadways with parking on both sides. This building will make a tough situation worse. Mass and scale are a major issue with this building. Kathleen Sonnabend, 268 Broadway. Clough Harbor has questions which have not yet been addressed. They are genuinely concerned regarding parking and the traffic issue. They have not included Broadway in their traffic study. She is concerned regarding the school buses, the aquifer, and the water table. This building is too big for the site, for the traffic and the parking. Dr. Robert Sponzo, 268 Broadway. His main concern is regarding traffic, and the turning radius onto Hamilton St. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated the Board will now move through Part II of the Long EAF for SEQRA for the project. The applicant has submitted Part I of the Long EAF, it has been revised and resubmitted, reviewed, and accurate. City of Saratoga Springs – Planning Board November 18, 2021 - Page 11 of 12 SEQRA: -Action appears to be a Type I action – property located within a historic district. -Part I of the Long EAF has been submitted – revised Part I submitted October 8, 2021. -DRC identified as only other involved agency. -DRC deferred Lead Agency Status to the Planning Board on September 2, 2021. -Traffic impact study issued May 27th and revised September 10. -SHPO letter – historic and cultural resources. -DRC Advisory Opinion provided on August 30, 2021. SEQRA DECISION: Ruth Horton stated based upon the information provided by the applicant in Part I of the SEQR Full Environmental Assessment Form, and analysis of the information provided and presented in Part II of the SEQR Full Environmental Assessment Form, I make a motion for a SEQR negative declaration since the project will not result in any large and important impacts and, therefore, is one that will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. Kerry Mayo seconded the motion. Mark Torpey, Chair, asked if there was any further discussion. None heard. VOTE: Mark Torpey, Chair, in favor; Ruth Horton, in favor; Kerry Mayo, in favor; Jason Doty, in favor; Al DalPos, in favor MOTION PASSES : 5-0 7. #2020757 MYRTLE STREET SITE PLAN, Corner of Myrtle Street and Morgan St., 1 Morgan Street and 55 Myrtle Street, Discussion: Advisory Opinion and design revision update pertaining to coordinated SEQRA Review for a phased project totaling 105,000 sq. ft. medical office use and associate site work in the Urban Residential-3 (UR-3) District. Mark Torpey, Chair stated there will be no vote taken this evening. We will be providing the applicant with guidance. It is intended to provide feedback to the applicant on what the Board would like to see at the next meeting. This application was before the Planning Board on September 30, 2021, for coordination of SEQRA review and request to function as Lead Agent. The Planning Board Requested an Advisory Opinion from the DRC regarding compatibility with community character and project design standpoint. The Planning Board also requested the DRC provide guidance on a commercial building design that respects the residential character of the neighborhood. Agent: Matthew Jones, Attorney; Matt Brobston, LA Group; Kevin Ronayne, Vice President Operations & Facilities – Saratoga Hospital; Jon Primeau, Architect, Architectural Collaborative Mr. Jones provided a visual of the proposed project, which was previously presented to the Board. As requested by the Planning Board the applicant appeared before the DRC for an Advisory Opinion. The DRC noted they feel indifferent about the two design options for the roof screening. The question of the roof screening versus gabled roof is inconsequential in terms of overall compatibility with the neighborhood and community character. The two options presented to the DRC showing varying setbacks and length of the screening would make a minimal difference to the City of Saratoga Springs – Planning Board November 18, 2021 - Page 12 of 12 compatibility to the neighborhood. A traditional or gabled mansard roof would be a more appropriate roof line versus what has been presented. at along with a proposed green roof. Mr. Brobston images of the from the adjacent neighborhood and noted the similar character this building is trying to emulate on the building. An aerial view of the project taken from the drone showing the Birch Run Subdivision and adjoining neighborhood. . Parking that is required is around those buildings as previously presented. Utilities for this phase and future Outside of the apartment complex there are single-family homes and the hospital which are visible. Mr. Brobston provided elevation drawings which have not changed. There were questions regarding the second phase of the project and a schematic drawing provided the area included in Phase II - two additional buildings up to 30,000 sq. ft. as their location was provided. Additional phases were also questioned and a visual of the utility connections and modifications were provided. Storm water systems were analyzed and designed to accommodate the design. Mr. Brobston also provided a visual of the streetscape improvements extending sidewalks down Myrtle and along Morgan Streets. Coming off Morgan and Myrtle there is a new proposed three way stop intersection. It is currently an unregulated intersection. We will be adding concrete curbing along Morgan and Myrtle. Sanitary sewer and storm main extensions along Myrtle are proposed. A visual of these plans were provided to the Board and reviewed. Water main extensions were reviewed as well. We have attempted to save the larger trees on the site, increasing the buffering and increasing the existing berm and increasing the landscape buffering on the berm provides as well as buffering to the neighbors. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated traffic is an issue and we would like to review that at the next meeting, along with curbing and proposed. Transportation is issue in the SEQRA we would like more data and information to understand all aspects of the improvement in this important corridor. The Chair noted he would like to have the traffic engineer at the next meeting along with the city’s engineer Chazen here to provide feedback. Susan Barden, Principal Planner stated they did provide a response and is in the Boards materials. Mr. Brobston stated Chazen did have questions which were answered and there are no further comments from them regarding traffic. Mark Torpey, Chair asked if DPS has provided comments. Susan Barden, Principal Planner stated the deferred to the City’s designated engineer. Mr. Brobston stated Mark Naldony, Creighton Manning can attend the meeting and provide and review their report and review Chazen’s comments. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated for the applicant to provide further information regarding the community character. This is something which the Board will be considering whether this project fits within the acceptable definition. For the next meeting we will review traffic and community character and compatibility. We should simply focus on that and hope to come to an acceptable understanding and a decision. Susan Barden, Principal Planner stated keep in mind that the SEQRA analysis is for all phases of the development. The Board may wish for more information regarding the other Phases since SEQRA will encompass the entire buildout. Mark Torpey, Chair, stated we will take comments. PUBLIC COMMENTS: City of Saratoga Springs – Planning Board November 18, 2021 - Page 13 of 12 Claudia Braymer, Braymer Law representing Alice Smith and other neighbors. We very much agree that two of the main concerns are traffic and the community character. We are asking that the Board issue a positive declaration and require a full environmental impact statement. This will require the applicant to go through and provide the Board with alternative designs and to develop all the mitigation necessary to mitigate the impacts of this project. She urged the Board members to review the DRC meeting. The building is far too big. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES: Jason Doty made a motion to approve the minutes of two Joint Board Meetings with the DRC on April 8, 2021, and April 22, 2021, and approval of the September 30th and October 28th Planning Board Meeting Minutes. Ruth Horton seconded the motion. VOTE: Mark Torpey, Chair, in favor; Ruth Horton, in favor; Kerry Mayo, in favor; Jason Doty, in favor; Al DalPos, in favor MOTION PASSES : 5-0 UPCOMING MEETINGS: Planning Board Workshop, Thursday, December 2, 2021, at 5:00 P.M. Planning Board Meeting, Thursday, December 9, 2021, at 6:00 PM. MOTION TO ADJOURN: There being no further business to discuss Mark Torpey, Chair adjourned the meeting at 10:12 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Diane M. Buzanowski Recording Secretary Approved: February 9, 2022 City of Saratoga Springs – Planning Board November 18, 2021 - Page 14 of 12