City Council Committees
Regular MeetingSchenectady, NY · February 3, 2020
Agenda
SCHENECTADY CITY COUNCIL
COMMITTEE AGENDA
for
Monday, February 3, 2020
5:30 p.m.
Room 110
The Council President reserves the right to add or delete any agenda item prior to Committee Meeting.
City Development & Planning
1 Adoption of the Craig-Main Connection Complete Streets Plan Kristin Diotte
2 Authorize the Issuance of Revocable Permit No. 648 to Square One Cafe for a Sign that will Chris Wallin
Overhang the City’s Right-of-Way at 185 Jay Street
3 CR – Recognizing Black History Month Marion Porterfield
4 Review - Zoning Change for Multiple Properties on Revere Avenue (PH 02/10/2020) Karen Zalewski-Wildzunas
5 An Ordinance Pursuant to Section 101 of the Second Class Cities Law Abandoning a Andrew Koldin
Portion of Pine Street (PH was on 10/15/2019)
6 Sale of 238 Bradford Road Andrew Koldin
7 Sale of 820 Grant Avenue Andrew Koldin
8 Sale of 1279 Parkwood Boulevard Andrew Koldin
Health & Recreation
1 Vale Urban Farm Use Agreement Gary R. McCarthy
Public Safety
1 CR – Recognizing Lt. James Sanders’ Graduation from the FBI National Academy John Polimeni
2 Discussion – Alternate Side Parking from November 1st through April 1st for Snowplowing John Polimeni
Finance
1 Amendment of Ordinance Creating a Special Assessment District on a Portion of Ardsley Andrew Koldin
Road
Claims
1 Scism v. City of Schenectady Andrew Koldin
Friday, January 17, 2020
CITY OF SCHENECTADY
LEGISLATION REQUEST FORM
COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENT: City Development & Planning DATE: 1/30/20
TO: Mayor McCarthy, City Council
FROM: Kristin Diotte, Director of Development
SUBJECT: Adoption of The Craig‐Main Connection Complete Streets Plan
Background Information:
The City of Schenectady was awarded funds from the Capital District Transportation Committee
to work with the community in creating a safer, more inviting and efficient corridor that takes
into consideration the needs of all travelers, including pedestrians, cyclists, transit riders and
motorists.
The Craig‐Main Connection was envisioned as a physical and social bridge to strengthen bonds
and empower access in the Mont Pleasant and Hamilton Hill community. The plan summary is
attached and further information can be found at www.craig‐main‐connection.com
Evaluation/Analysis:
Staff from the Development and Engineering departments, along with the project sponser, and
consultants from Place Alliance, Creighton Manning, LandArt Studio and Mutual Design worked
closely with the residents and stakeholders of Hamilton Hill and Mont Pleasant. Several public
workshops and meetings were held throughout the analysis and design phases of the plan. The
social impact in the planning stage of this project through community engagement and
participatory design has been instrumental toward the City's goals for neighborhood
stabilization and community development.
The document produced is a combination of the community’s vision for their neighborhoods
and safe transit priniples that will serve as a helpful guide when implementing future
improvements and investments to the Craig‐Main Corridor.
Recommendation:
Adoption of the Craig‐Main Connection Complete Streets Plan as a City priority for
implementation in the coming years.
LEGISLATION WILL BE PREPARED BY ______Law Department_______
CRAIG - MAIN CONNECTION
City of Schenectady Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy designed for the community, by the community
“The purpose of the Craig-Main Complete Streets Study
is to work with the Hamilton Hill and Mont Pleasant
Neighborhoods to identify a Complete Streets design that
will better serve the neighborhoods through creation of a
safer, more efficient and more inviting corridor that takes
into consideration the needs of all travelers, including
pedestrians, cyclists, transit riders and motorists.”
Long-term proposed plan at Pleasant Valley Park Long-term proposed plan at the intersection of Main Ave, Crane St & Chrisler Ave
The long-term success of these potentially implemented projects is improved through community
involvement. Organizations, trades people, or certified contractors interested in involvement, or persons
who are interested in training opportunities can contact the City of Schenectady Department of Planning
and Development or refer to the project website.
Visit www.craig-main-connection.com for
project updates and information
For more information contact Kristin Diotte at the City at 518-382-5147 or craigmainconnection@gmail.com
CRAIG - MAIN CONNECTION FOREST
City of Schenectady Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy designed for the community, by the community
Recommended Project :: Craig Street STREET TREES PROVIDING
DEFENSIBLE SPACE AND
IMPROVED STREET EXPERIENCE
Separated two-way bicycle path - $4.37 Million (2022 Projections)
The heavily favored concept incorporates separated bicycle and pedestrian paths.
This concept includes narrowing drive aisle lanes to 10.5’ and providing an 8’ on-
street parking lane on the west side of Craig Street. A 5’ minimum landscape buffer UTILITY STRIP FOR
with street trees separates an 8’ two-way bike path from the roadway. A 2.5’ utility BOLLARDS, TRASH
RECEPTACLES AND
WEST
strip housing bollards and trash receptacles separates the pedestrian from the bicy- BUFFER
clist, with a 4’ minimum pedestrian sidewalk. Expanded sidewalk with street trees
on the west side of the street would provide a wide, safe pedestrian experience.
5’
4.5
Recommended Project :: Bridge Improvements
MIN
8’
10.5’
BUFFER ZONE
SIDEWALK
10.5’
Separated two-way bicycle path - $1 Million (2022 Projections)
PARKING
5’
DRIVE AISLE
MIN
8’
DRIVE AISLE
The streetscape improvements from Craig Street would extend across the bridge 2.5’ 4’
BUFFER ZONE
TOTA MIN
L SEC
EAST
BICYCLE PATH
TION
and connect to Pleasant Valley Park. Since street trees are not an option along the LENG
TH: 58
UTILITY ZONE
-64’ (N
OT IN
CLUD
bridge, vertical elements such as bollards and improved pedestrian lighting with ING
BLOC
K 1 @ AL
BANY
ST.) SIDEWALK
neighborhood banners are a great alternative for creating defensible space. More
immediate and manageable improvements to the bridge could be to install com-
munity artwork on the fence to both beautify the experience and to visually buffer
route 890, thereby making the pedestrian experience more comfortable. Proposed streetscape improvements on Craig Street
Recommended Project :: Pleasant Valley Park
$1.2 Million (2022 Projections)
The proposed Pleasant Valley Park improvements include connections to Pleasant
Valley and MLK Schools as well as the new Boys and Girls Club. Also included
are a 4-court basketball facility, a park structure for picnicking, workout stations,
an art wall with rotating murals by local artists, open lawn for passive play, and an
integrated skate and BMX park that functions as plaza space.
Recommended Project :: Main Avenue
$43,700 (2022 Projections) Traffic Analysis recommended
Main Avenue presents a heavier challenge in accommodating bicycle
infrastructure due to its narrow width, which also makes it difficult for pedestrians
and motorists. A traffic study is therefore recommended to analyze the impacts
of potentially converting street(s) to one-way, with the possibility of extending the
Craig Street improvements to Main Ave. When asked, the majority of participants
felt that it would be worth further study of the different impacts (with additional
public input).
Proposed bridge improvements connecting Craig Street to Pleasant
Valley Park and Main Ave.
Recommended Project :: Intersection of Crane St,
Chrisler Ave & Main Ave $743,000 (2022 Projections)
The proposed plan reduces the amount of excess pavement by extending the
sidewalk connecting point between Chrisler and Crane, no longer allowing
cars coming from Chrisler to U-turn onto Crane St and vice versa. This will reduce
excess pavement and provide a crossing reprieve, which reduces crossing
distances. Intersection bumpouts will also reduce pedestrian crossing distances
while providing more space in the sidewalk zones. The concept proposes to table
the intersection with a different material encouraging drivers to reduce speeds and
increase alertness.
Recommended Project :: Public Art
The project proposes incorporation of public art throughout the corridor as a
way to celebrate the community and inspire neighborhood pride. Opportunities
include gateways, crosswalks, along the bridge, at Pleasant Valley Park, and as
part of wayfinding. Groups from the community, including C.O.C.O.A. House, the
Hamilton Hill Arts Center, Miracle on Craig Street, and local artists have started to Proposed intersection improvements at Crane St, Chrisler Ave & Main Ave
collaborate on ideas for executing some ideas for implementing public art.
Visit www.craig-main-connection.com for
project updates and information
For more information contact Kristin Diotte at the City at 518-382-5147 or craigmainconnection@gmail.com
SCHENECTADY CITY COUNCIL
Legislative Request Form
Committee: City Development & Planning Committee Date: Monday, February 03, 2020
From: Marion Porterfield
Subject CR - Recognizing Black History Month
Background Info:
Evaluation/Analysis
Recommendation
Monday, February 03, 2020
SCHENECTADY CITY COUNCIL
Legislative Request Form
Committee: City Development & Planning Committee Date: Monday, February 03, 2020
From: Karen Zalewski-Wildzunas
Subject Review - PH 02/10/2020 Regarding a Zoning Change for Multiple Properties on Revere Avenue
Background Info:
Public Hearing on 2/10/2020
Evaluation/Analysis
Recommendation
Monday, February 03, 2020
SCHENECTADY CITY COUNCIL
Legislative Request Form
Committee: City Development & Planning Committee Date: Monday, February 03, 2020
From: Karen Zalewski-Wildzunas
Subject Review - An Ordinance Pusuant to Section 101 of the Second Class Cities Law Abandoning a Portion
of Pine Street. PH was on 10/15/2019
Background Info:
Evaluation/Analysis
Recommendation
Monday, February 03, 2020
CITY COUNCIL
SCHENECTADY, NEW YORK
ORDINANCE NO.
Councilmember offered the following:
AN ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO SECTION 101
OF THE SECOND CLASS CITIES LAW
ABANDONING A PORTION OF PINE STREET.
BE IT ENACTED by the Council of the City of Schenectady, in regular meeting
convened, as follows:
That portion of the City Street as designated on the Official Map of the City and
known as Pine Street, described as follow – Beginning at a point located along
the south line of Green Street, said point being the intersection formed by said
south line of Green Street with the division line between the lands now or
formerly of Schenectady Urban Renewal Agency (Book 1982, Page 302) on the
west and the westerly line of Pine Street on the east; thence from said point of
beginning and along Green Street extended, South 87°25’00” East, 38.07 feet to
a point; thence along the lands now or formerly of the Delaware & Hudson
Railroad, South 25°44’00” West, 158.84 feet to a point; thence along the lands
now or formerly of Conrail, South 58°58’52” West, 63.84 feet to a point; thence
along the first mentioned division line, North 25°44’00” East, 197.26 feet to the
point or place of beginning, containing in all 6,232 Sq. Ft of land being more or
less – is hereby closed, abandoned and discontinued, effective immediately.
Approved as to form this
___ day of _____________ 2020.
________________________________
ANDREW KOLDIN, ESQ.
CORPORATION COUNSEL
SCHENECTADY CITY COUNCIL
Legislative Request Form
Committee: City Development & Planning Committee Date: Monday, February 03, 2020
From: Andrew Koldin
Subject Sale of 238 Bradford Road
Background Info:
Evaluation/Analysis
Recommendation
Monday, February 03, 2020
SCHENECTADY CITY COUNCIL
Legislative Request Form
Committee: City Development & Planning Committee Date: Monday, February 03, 2020
From: Andrew Koldin
Subject Sale of 238 Bradford Road
Background Info:
Evaluation/Analysis
Recommendation
Monday, February 03, 2020
SCHENECTADY CITY COUNCIL
Legislative Request Form
Committee: City Development & Planning Committee Date: Monday, February 03, 2020
From: Andrew Koldin
Subject Sale of 820 Grant Avenue
Background Info:
Evaluation/Analysis
Recommendation
Monday, February 03, 2020
SCHENECTADY CITY COUNCIL
Legislative Request Form
Committee: City Development & Planning Committee Date: Monday, February 03, 2020
From: Andrew Koldin
Subject Sale of 1279 Parkwood Boulevard
Background Info:
Evaluation/Analysis
Recommendation
Monday, February 03, 2020
SCHENECTADY CITY COUNCIL
Legislative Request Form
Committee: Health & Recreation Committee Date: Monday, February 03, 2020
From: Gary McCarthy
Subject Vale Urban Farm Use Agreement
Background Info:
Evaluation/Analysis
Recommendation
Monday, February 03, 2020
SCHENECTADY CITY COUNCIL
Legislative Request Form
Committee: Public Safety Committee Date: Monday, February 03, 2020
From: Karen Zalewski-Wildzunas
Subject CR - Recognizing Lt. James Sanders' Graduation from the FBI National Academy
Background Info:
Evaluation/Analysis
Recommendation
Monday, February 03, 2020
SCHENECTADY CITY COUNCIL
Legislative Request Form
Committee: Public Safety Committee Date: Monday, February 03, 2020
From: John Polimeni
Subject Discussion - Alternate Side Parking from November 1st through April 1st for Snowplowing
Background Info:
Evaluation/Analysis
Recommendation
Monday, February 03, 2020
CITY OF SCHENECTADY
LEGISLATIVE REQUEST FORM
COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENT: DATE: February 3, 2020
TO: City Council
FROM: Andrew Koldin, Corporation Counsel
SUBJECT: Amendment of Ordinance Creating a Special Assessment District on a
Portion of Ardsley Road
Background Information:
On September 23, 2019, the City Council, after a public hearing, passed an ordinance
creating a special assessment district on a portion of Ardsley Road. The rate at which
affected property owners were to be charged was $81.71 per linear foot of frontage. The
original ordinance is attached hereto.
On January 27, 2020, the City Council held a public hearing with respect to amending an
ordinance creating a special assessment district on a portion of Ardsley Road. The
proposed amendment to the ordinance would change the rate at which affected property
owners are to be charged to $55.44 per linear foot of frontage. The documentation
provided in consideration of the public hearing is attached hereto.
Evaluation/Analysis:
Please see the attached documentation detailing cost changes to the affected property
owners.
Recommendation:
Approval of the legislative request to amend the September 23, 2019 ordinance,
identified as “Resolution No. 2019-11” – An Ordinance pursuant to Section C-3 of the
City Charter Creating a Special Assessment District on a Portion of Ardsley Road by
reducing the cost to affected property owners from $81.71 per linear foot of frontage to
$55.44 per linear foot of frontage.
LEGISLATION WILL BE PREPARED BY_____LAW DEPARTMENT_________
ARDSLEY ROAD: Poject Costs ARDSLEY ROAD: Assesment Cost by Address
ASSESSED COST TO
ASSESSED COST
ACTUAL PRICE PER TOTAL ITEM SET PRICE PROPERTY
ITEM DESRIPTION UNIT ADDRESS STREET FRONTAGE (ft)* * DIVIDED BY TEN
QUANTITY UNIT COST PER LF OWNER****
(10) YEARS****
(frontage x price)
#001 MOBILIZATION EA 1.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 6,500.00 1031 Ardsley 223 ** $ 55.44 $ 12,363.12 $ 1,236.31
#115.3 REMOVAL OF TREES AND STUMPS 24‐36" EA 10.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 45,000.00 1034 Ardsley 55 $ 55.44 $ 3,049.20 $ 304.92
#350.11 CONSTRUCTION OF 6" SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY SY 1000.95 $ 112.00 $ 112,106.40 1037 Ardsley 100 $ 55.44 $ 5,544.00 $ 554.40
#380 BAR/MESH REINFORCEMENT SY 218.92 $ 5.00 $ 1,094.60 1040 Ardsley 45 $ 55.44 $ 2,494.80 $ 249.48
#700.01 WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.00 $ 27,000.00 $ 27,000.00 1043 Ardsley 50 $ 55.44 $ 2,772.00 $ 277.20
#851 TOPSOIL SY 411.45 $ 75.00 $ 30,858.75 1046 Ardsley 45 $ 55.44 $ 2,494.80 $ 249.48
#852 SEED SY 411.45 $ 38.00 $ 15,635.10 1049 Ardsley 50 $ 55.44 $ 2,772.00 $ 277.20
TOTAL COST $ 238,194.85 1052 Ardsley 0 $ 55.44 $ ‐ $ ‐
1055 Ardsley 0 $ 55.44 $ ‐ $ ‐
1058 Ardsley 45 $ 55.44 $ 2,494.80 $ 249.48
COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS 1061 Ardsley 50 $ 55.44 $ 2,772.00 $ 277.20
‐ CONCRETE SIDEWALK LF 1,425 $ 55.44 $ 79,002.00 1064 Ardsley 0 $ 55.44 $ ‐ $ ‐
TAXPAYER SHARE $ 79,002.00 1069 Ardsley 50 $ 55.44 $ 2,772.00 $ 277.20
1070 Ardsley 45 $ 55.44 $ 2,494.80 $ 249.48
1076 Ardsley 37 $ 55.44 $ 2,051.28 $ 205.13
CITY SHARE 1077 Ardsley 50 $ 55.44 $ 2,772.00 $ 277.20
‐ TOTAL COST $ 238,194.85 1082 Ardsley 0 $ 55.44 $ ‐ $ ‐
‐ LESS COST TO PROPERTY OWNERS $ (79,002.00) 1085 Ardsley 50 $ 55.44 $ 2,772.00 $ 277.20
CITY SHARE $ 159,192.85 1089 Ardsley 50 $ 55.44 $ 2,772.00 $ 277.20
1092 Ardsley 120 $ 55.44 $ 6,652.80 $ 665.28
1095 Ardsley 50 $ 55.44 $ 2,772.00 $ 277.20
1345 Union 310 *** $ 55.44 $ 17,186.40 $ 1,718.64
TOTAL FRONTAGE 1425
* Frontage determined from Tax Maps.
** Additional frontage is for 20 ft on side street to connect to ADA ramps.
*** Additional frontage is for 20 ft on side street to connect to ADA ramps as well as 100 ft along Unoin Street.
**** These costs do NOT include interest.
SCHENECTADY CITY COUNCIL
Legislative Request Form
Committee: Claims Committee Date: Monday, February 03, 2020
From: Andrew Koldin
Subject Scism v. City of Schenectady
Background Info:
Evaluation/Analysis
Recommendation
Monday, February 03, 2020
Get email alerts for Schenectady
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.