Historic Resource Commission
Regular MeetingSchenectady, NY · January 26, 2023
Minutes
Schenectady Historic District Commission
Meeting Minutes
January 26, 2023
I. CALL TO ORDER
Commissioner Yager called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Patricia Yager, Chair; Joe Fava, Dr. Dean Bennett; Richard Unger; Zakhar
Berkovich; Christopher Marney, City Counsel, and Sylvia Jimison, Development Staff
Excused: Shaun Andriano and Austin Erickson
Attorney Chris Marney facilitated meeting in Austin Erickson absence.
III. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.
IV. ADOPTION OF MEETING MEETINGS
Motioned by Commissioner Fava and seconded by Commissioner Berkovich to approve
December 22, 2022 Minutes. Motion carried unanimously. (Absent Commissioner Andriano)
Commissioner Unger indicated a correction is needed for November 27, 2022 Minutes. There was
additional narrative/wordage that was not intended for a statement typed in the November minutes.
IV. Call for Members of Public to Speak on Agenda Items
VI. Applications
A. Consideration for approval submitted by Wessington Clark Development to install three exterior
lights along the driveway. The premises is located in the Union Street Corridor Historic
District at 210 Union St.
The applicants Mr. Michael Buzzo and Mr. Nicolas Buzzo came before the commission to state that
there have been cars broken into and strangers climbing the fire escape. The police have been called to the
property, so that is why lights were installed for safety reasons. Since installing the lights there have not
been any police runs to the property.
Historic District Commission Meeting Minutes January 26, 2023 –Page 1 of 10
Commissioner Yager said the lights are very bright and she read a letter from Commissioner Andriano
who could not be present for the meeting to the applicant. Commissioner Andriano indicated that the
lights installed are too bright at 5000K. The light fixtures are not historically appropriate and most
residential home should have 3000K fixtures. 3000K is the light color most related to incandescent and is
warm in color. Commissioner Yager provided a copy of the letter to the applicants.
Commissioner Berkovich suggested a motion detector type light and that the lights should be down
pointed, not as bright and because it overshadows the historic nature of the walkway.
The applicant asked what if he lowered the K and what would be the process?
Attorney Marney indicated that there is an appeal process available.
RESOLUTION
Commissioner Unger motioned to deny the application and Commissioner Berkovich seconded.
Motion carried unanimously. (Commissioner Andriano absent)
The Commissioners advised the applicant to read Commissioner Andriano letter for applicable
lighting and return to the commission. They also suggested carriage light style, goose neck, down
lights (not to shine onto others property), 3000K conduit, and to be painted to blend with brick.
B. Consideration for approval submitted by Affinity Group to 1. prep & paint all exterior wood trim.
2. Refurbish & paint steel fire escape. 3. Prep & paint steel fence on Union St. 4. Refurbish &
stain front doors. 5. Erect 6’ wood fence along north property line. 6. Erect wood fence enclosure
at utility & dumpster. The premises is located in the Union Street Corridor Historic District at
620 Union St.
Mr. Ray Gillen of Metroplex, Planning and Economic Development, came before the commission in
support of the Affinity Group project. He said he helped recruit Affinity Group to downtown.
He stated the following, “unfortunately, Walker passed away and his family was marketing the church for
quite a while. We heard the Affinity Group was looking for a location. They're a national company.
They're based in the Buffalo area and will bring 20 people with plans to grow to 30 employees.
They're going to put a training kitchen and test kitchen in the building. We hope they work with our great
culinary program at the community college and with the downtown restaurant scene. They're very
plugged into that scene and excited about it. This is a really growing, great company, great employer, that
is taking a church and putting it back into productive use.
It's a great thing to the lower Union Street business quarter and greater downtown. They are very sensitive
to the building's historic character and want to do all the right things. We're very pleased that you're here
tonight as a contractor to answer any questions but we hope we can have a good discussion to try to move
this project forward so we can get going with the renovations and bring putting jobs to downtown.
Anytime you have a building like this. It's vacant for a long time. It's just never good. It's just never good.
So, we're just thrilled to see a great growing company like Affinity Group. Thank you.”
Historic District Commission Meeting Minutes January 26, 2023 –Page 2 of 10
Commissioner Yager read a letter from Schenectady Heritage Foundation. The Schenectady Heritage
Foundation had concerns about the fencing that will be placed at the property and maintenance of the
historic preservation of the cast iron fencing in place. They were concerned about wooden fencing not
being appropriate for historical presence. The letter stated the fence is an important architectural feature
that separates the two historic properties while enhancing the streetscape. The letter also stated that lower
Union Street cast iron fences are a significant characteristic of the Historic District. Also, if the wooden
fence is to provide a barrier for snow plowing and that other solutions exist. “The installation of a solid
wooden fence should be prohibited, and the restoration of historic fence should be required in the cause of
damage.”
Thomas Reed and Brian Ralston contractors for Affinity Group addressed the commissioners:
He said, “we've already sanded and scraped a portion of the fence and it's complete. There's still about
two thirds of that must be completed and will complete in the spring when the weather's better.
But when it comes to the wooden fence, it's not for snowfall is to keep the neighbors from going through
the parking lot, it's a safety issue that we have. The neighbors constantly go through the historic fences,
there is two and a half or three feet high, it's very short. They just step over it and walk through the
parking lot.
The historic fence, the wooden fence that we were suggesting was originally going to be just stockade
fence, which had become a see through it. But now we're talking about board-on-board fence, which you
can see 30% is open. There are pictures in the applications that show the best of what we propose. But we
need a taller fence so that people just can't walk through the parking lot. It's a very bad safety issue for us,
especially with the number of individuals and the people I bring in from outside, trying to keep safety for
our clients.”
Commissioner Yager asked about a 5’ fence.
Mr. Reed said the stockade fence will be behind the property and they will refurbish existing fence. The
historic fence goes to corner of the lot.
Commissioner Berkovich asked Mr. Reed about shrubbery as a barrier along the fence instead of a 6 ft
fence. Commissioner Unger stated a 6 ft fence is not allowed in the front yard. Mr. Reed said the
shrubbery would get destroyed. He referenced St. Peter’s Hospital in Albany and the Jewish Community
Center as to what happen to the plants there.
The wooden fence will be made the same colors- dark walnut. The iron fences along Union Street are
black. Door and window trim, dark eagle blue, and fire escape will be black. There was a car accident that
hit the exterior of the bricks and will be repairing to match the existing bricks.
Ms. Gloria Kishton, from the Schenectady Heritage Foundation provided comments about the proposed
fence. Ms. Kishton said she had concerns about the historic fence and that the commission cannot make
decisions regarding safety issues. She wanted to know who owns the historic fence and who is going to
take care of the fence on the actual property line. Mr. Reed said he would be refurbishing the fence and
taking care of it.
Historic District Commission Meeting Minutes January 26, 2023 –Page 3 of 10
Ms. Kishton added that she knows of a company that specializes in front doors and that does fabulous
work and detailed work. She would be happy to share the contact information with Mr. Reed.
Mr. Reed said the cast iron fence will be in front of the wooden fence and seen. The fence will be closer
to the building. Ms. Kishton said she does not agree with this and thinks a shorter fence that does not go
all the way down Union St would be an acceptable compromise.
Attorney Marney said a double fence will be a second site plan process and is to be a 6ft fence for the
dumpster requirements.
RESOLUTION
Commissioner Unger made a motion to grant the application, seconded by Commissioner Berkovich
with the following conditions: Motion carried unanimously. (Absent Commissioner Andriano):
• 5 ft board-on-board fence and shall not be installed in front yard
• Enclosed utility dumpster – permitting process for site plan
• Iron fence -straighten, refurbish, and black paint.
• Colors for doors dark walnut (color 2716) and windows color 6244 – maple
• Fire escape to be black
• Wood fence dark stained – dark walnut
• SEQR 2 Application 2, 5,6, 7, 9 and 10
C. Consideration for approval submitted by Homes By Harline, LLC to replace seven exterior
windows. The premises is located in the Union Street Corridor Historic District at 856 Union
St.
Ms. Harlene came before the commission requesting requirements that are needed to replace 7
windows on the second floor of property at 856 Union Street. She wanted to know if all the windows
needed to be wood or aluminum clad. She said she would get estimates for both. Finally, looking for
guidance from the commission about replacing the windows.
Commissioner Yager stated that vinyl don’t hold up and better off with wooden windows. The
commission has permitted wood or aluminum clad wooden windows.
Ms. Kishton said the former structure on the property had burned down.
Attorney Marney said he did confirm the county has the property listed effective as of 1980.
“It's a noncontributing structure in a historic district. The aesthetic review is pretty much the same, to
make sure that it's harmonious with the neighboring historic properties. It's not detracting from
anything. The one easier part is we're not talking about a loss of historic materials because the
building is okay.”
RESOLUTION
Commissioner Unger made a motion and Commissioner Dr. Bennett seconded the motion to deny the
application as presented and the finding is that it does not meet criteria standards 5, 6 or 9.: Motion
carried unanimously. (Absent Commissioner Andriano)
Historic District Commission Meeting Minutes January 26, 2023 –Page 4 of 10
The applicant has been advised to return to the commission with specifications for either wooden or
aluminum clad windows.
VII. Miscellaneous (see attached document for regulations and design guideline comments)
A. Updated regulations discussion
Commissioner Yager – “I see throughout it's either Historic District commission or Historic
Commission. I think the commission probably isn't historic, but the districts are. So, I think Historic
District commission should be part of it. But why can't we use the acronym HDC?”
Attorney Marney “So the reason we switched from Historic Commission is because that is what the code
says this Commission is named, so that is why the Guidelines were updated to reflect that.” He went on to
say that this Commission doesn’t just have purview over Historic Districts, but over Historical Landmarks
as well. In the new code there will be a process for landmarking as an alternative to using Historic
Districts. Thus, to call it the Historic District Commission wouldn’t be entirely accurate.
Commissioner Unger – Thanked Commissioner Yager for bringing up the point and asked to comment
on it. He read aloud a comment he wrote:
“I recommend changing the name Historic Commission throughout the code to Historic District
Commission. While the commission can be given any name -you could call this a horse if you want, the
Horse Commission, it’d be misleading. But you can call it whatever you want. While the Commission can
be given any name, The Historic District Commission conveys the mission of the Commission, though it
does not also deal with landmarks in addition to districts. The Commission itself is not old enough to be
historic and in common use it’s often referred to as Historic District Commission, when we do that. At
least the code should declare the official name of the Commission, if you have Historic Commission,
Historic District Commission, whatever you want, you might also consider Historic Preservation
Commission. That’s what we do. And then also reference, also known as Historic Commission, Historic
District Commission, HDC, and HC. Put those in there, so when we have a slip of the tongue and we refer
to it one way, we know that we’re intending it the other way as well.”
Commissioner Yager- Brought up the point that just calling it the Commission gets confusing as there is
also a Planning Commission.
Attorney Marney - “What about Historic Resources Commission?...That's what Albany calls their
commission. And specifically, one of the language things that was updated in the code was specifically
referring to this Commission's purview over is historic resources.”
Commissioner Unger, Commissioner Yager, and Attorney Marney finished the conversation by
concluding that Historic Resources Commission may be the best option. As long as whatever is chosen
remains consistent.
Historic District Commission Meeting Minutes January 26, 2023 –Page 5 of 10
Sidewalks
Commissioner Unger began a discussion of the sidewalks and dealing with the Historic Stockade Plan. He
said that going through the codes, he believed it to be appropriate and something the Commission can
handle.
Attorney Marney: “These will all be the very specific items that were call out and prepaid plan that will
be codified into the sidewalk chapter. So, for granted versus the stamping and the pigmentation, all of that
will be codified.”
Commissioner Yager: Asking a question pertaining to the color of the concrete. “How are they going to
determine that when you’re mixing with concrete, are they going to turn the right colors? Is there a
formula?”
Commissioner Unger: Notified that there is a formula regarding the proper dying procedures for the
concrete within the Stockade Streetscape plan. He also mentioned that some cities form a procedure to
double check the color. He notes that the sidewalk code is currently only for the Stockade.
Commissioner Berkovich – inquired about what would happen if the dye company went out of business.
There was a quick discussion that determined at that point the project would be done with the closest
match in color.
Trees and Shrubs
Commissioner Unger: Moved the conversation onto Chapter 243 on Trees and Shrubs.
“The master tree list? I don't think I had anything that- again has to do with mostly the Stockade Historic
District and the Streetscape plan. Again, I think this is consistent with the city's count with the City
Council's adoption of the Stockade Streetscape plan. So we will review these before they go through any
application in Stockade we will review the streetscape plan in front of the house if they're if they're doing
something?”
Attorney Marney: After initially confirming, he backtracked to say that “That was originally what was
proposed, the Development office has decided that it’d be more appropriate for that to be staff approval.
So the streetscape and sidewalks are being pulled for staff approvals to make sure they’re consistent with
the comprehensive street plan- Streetscape Plan and then um, the sidewalk requirements.”
Commissioner Unger: “So, this will be embedded in the Code, but it’s going to be a staff approval?” He
asked if there was an appeal opportunity and if the applicant would be referred to the Historic
Commission.
Attorney Marney: It would be an appeal to the BZA or it would be an Article 78. Commissioner Unger
suggested they should come to the Historic Commission.
Historic District Commission Meeting Minutes January 26, 2023 –Page 6 of 10
Commissioner Fava: Asked what if the applicant put in natural concrete, what leverage does the City
have?
Attorney Marney- “The city has the ability to get injunctive relief to actually force the property owner to
remove the concrete.”
After a brief discussion, it was noted that it is more difficult to enforce rules on utility contractors as
opposed to private citizens.
Commissioner Berkovich- Asked about the procedures regarding the sidewalks and revealed some
inconsistencies in the language of the code. Attorney Marney said he would look into it.
The Commissioners returned to their discussion on Trees and Shrubs.
Attorney Marney: “And this will be in connection now with the revised ordinance. Provides that any
removal of an established tree and the historic district will require approval from the Commission, so long
as it’s visible from a public right of way.”
Commissioner Yager: Asked if the commission would be in charge of the Master tree list, specially who
would be overseeing the trees?
Attorney Marney: “The Historic Commission would adopt for consulting with persons such as the
Stockade Association Arborist, nursery persons, Cornell property extension or other individuals
specializing in the urban environment.”
Commissioner Fava: “Is there anything here that says a tree planted is to be the appropriate to the size of
the building?”
Attorney Marney: Informed him that will be part of the staff review from staff.
A small discussion took place about the width of trees and where that is measured, it was determined that
it was measured at “breast height” or four and a half feet.
Off Street Parking
Attorney Marney: “This was just adding one tiny statement that approvals in Historic Districts are
required.”
Commissioner Unger: Confirmed that this has been an issue.
There was a quick discussion regarding tree approvals again, and it was determined that there is not an
Environmental Commission, that language was left in the code from a previous revision.
264-8 Definition for the Historic District
Historic District Commission Meeting Minutes January 26, 2023 –Page 7 of 10
Commissioner Yager: Brought a small edit to the table and it was noted.
Attorney Marney: “And our goal with these sections was to eliminate- so a lot of them had language in
them about what’s okay and what’s not okay. Just eliminate it and say refer to chapter ten.” As that is
where are the Historic zoning code is and it may help with confusion. “So, we made the changes
consistent with the RH-2 as well, which is the Stockade. The recommendations there were to eliminate
home occupations and the conversion of existing single-family homes into two-family dwellings.”
Commissioner Bennet: “Is that entirely new? That limit?”
Attorney Marney: “Yes.”
Commissioner Bennet: “Why?”
Attorney Marney: “Because the district has maybe 25% single family homes left. The remainder have
already been converted to multifamily dwellings or other uses. So, with respect to the density in the
Stockade this service to slow that density, especially considering the construction limitations of the
neighborhood. But also, to protect the historic resources or main single-family homes, their allowed.”
Commissioner Bennet: He agreed with the conversion of single family to two-family but stated that he
was otherwise opposed to the limits.
A discussion was then had about the ability to build two family homes in the area, and whether that would
require parking or not. It was mentioned that one could get a variance for parking and that the City in
general was looking into reforming parking standards.
Attorney Marney: “But, in any event, the purpose of this is to protect the remaining single-family
homes. You could build a two-family as a right, it’s still not going to be a multi-family district. It’s just a
two-family district and then eliminate the conversion of single-family houses into professional offices.”
Commissioner Bennet confirmed that these were proposed changes and that they could voice opposition
at the City Council public hearing if wanted. Commissioner Berkovich stated that he has mixed feelings
about these changes.
Commissioner Unger mentioned that he might be in favor of this as it can possibly limit absentee
landlords.
Article 10
Attorney Marney: “So, yes, now, Article 10, so Article 10 is essentially complete, almost a complete,
rewrite to the ordinance. And we did our best to try and incorporate as many more modern, historic
preservation standards and requirements for being used, but you know, also recognizing that we kind of
have our process here and what’s typically done.”
It was noted that this is where the name of the Commission could be changed to Historic Resources
Commission.
Historic District Commission Meeting Minutes January 26, 2023 –Page 8 of 10
Commissioner Unger: “What’s the likelihood of seeing more OH districts if we have landmarks?”
Attorney Marney went on to explain that it was envisioned is that the OH should be used when multiple
properties in a group become Historic and landmarking would be a “one-off” building.
A discussion ensued. Commissioner Unger asked if the Commission could look at interiors of buildings
if that was the specific reason for the designation, Attorney Marney confirmed.
Commissioner Yager: “’Section B, paragraph- subsection 3, District Designation and Amendments: The
Commission may investigate and transmit recommendations to the City Council and Planning
Commission, (See, that’s where Commission comes in.) concerning the establishment, amendment, or
alteration of Historic District, establishment of a landmark, at the end of this article.’ I didn’t understand
what this article means.”
Attorney Marney clarified that it had to do with changes regarding the actual zoning code. Meaning to
say that the Historic Commission can make recommendations for that code change. He went on to talk
about other changes made concerning emergency demolition, ordinary maintenance, and repair, and what
would require staff approval. He again mentioned the Stockade Streetscape plan.
Commissioner Unger asked about the notification process, and Attorney Marney made note that this
should be addressed. He then asked if there were any other questions regarding this section. He confirmed
that building permits would have to do with any exterior renovations.
Commissioner Berkovich asked about gas meters. A discussion was held about what National Grid does
and how to communicate with them. The meeting was again opened to questions.
Commissioner Yager: 264-76 application for observation, demolition, or new construction. The zoning
officer or designee determines what view is from the right of way, she asked if this was correct.
Attorney Marney clarified that the designee was whoever the staff member was facilitating the meeting,
but the officer was still needed. He went on to clarify that it is the City who determines what is visible,
not the applicant.
Commissioner Yager asked if there should be more detail regarding “fair market value” as listed in the
appeals process. It was determined that more research would be done into this. After a brief discussion
regarding emergency demolition, the Commissioner brought up a concern in the definitions regarding
signage and demolitions, which Attorney Marney said he would investigate this. The Commissioner also
suggested that chimneys be taken off of the general repair list.
B. Design Guidelines discussion- motion made by Commissioner Unger to table until February
23, 2023 commission meeting and Commissioner Yager seconded the motion. Motion carried
unanimously. (Absent Commissioner Andriano)
C. Electing New Chair and Vice Chair – motion made by Commissioner Unger for Commissioner
Pat Yager to remain as chair and Commissioner Fava seconded the motion. Motion carried
Historic District Commission Meeting Minutes January 26, 2023 –Page 9 of 10
unanimously. (Absent Commissioner Andriano). Motion made by Commissioner Fava for
Commissioner Joe Fava to be elected Vice Chair, seconded by Commissioner Bennet. Motion
carried unanimously.
VIII. Adjourn- motion made by Commissioner Berkovich to adjourn at 9:02 p.m. and seconded by
Commissioner Unger. Motion carried unanimously. (Absent Commissioner Andriano)
Historic District Commission Meeting Minutes January 26, 2023 –Page 10 of 10
Agenda
Schenectady Historic District Commission
To: Historic District Commission
From: Austin Erickson, Assistant Planner
Subject: Regular Meeting, Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 7:00 PM – City Hall – Room 110
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Conflicts of Interest
IV. Adoption of Prior Meeting's Minutes
A. December 22nd
V. Call for Members of Public to Speak on Agenda Items
VI. Applications
A. Consideration for approval submitted by Wessington Clark Development to install three
exterior lights along the driveway. The premises is located in the Union Street
Corridor Historic District at 210 Union St.
B. Consideration for approval submitted by Affinity Group to 1. prep & paint all exterior
wood trim. 2. Refurbish & paint steel fire escape. 3. Prep & paint steel fence on Union St.
4. Refurbish & stain front doors. 5. Erect 6’ wood fence along north property line. 6.
Erect wood fence enclosure at utility & dumpster. The premises is located in the Union
Street Corridor Historic District at 620 Union St.
C. Consideration for approval submitted by Homes By Harline, LLC to replace seven
exterior windows. The premises is located in the Union Street Corridor Historic
District at 856 Union St.
VII. Miscellaneous
A. Updated regulations discussion
B. Design Guidelines discussion
C. Electing New Chair and Vice Chair
VIII. Adjourn
Get email alerts for Schenectady
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.