Planning Commission
Regular MeetingSchenectady, NY · September 19, 2018
Minutes
City of Schenectady
Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes
September 19, 2018
I. CALL TO ORDER
Commissioner Wallinger called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m.
II. ATTENDANCE
PRESENT: Mary Moore Wallinger, Chair; Bradley Lewis, Vice Chair; Ryan
P. Bailey; Randall Beach; Andrew Healey; Richard Ferro; Jason
Bogdanowicz-Wilson; Christine Primiano, Principal Planner; Rachael Ward,
Deputy Corporation Counsel
EXCUSED: Julia Stone
III. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CHECK
None.
IV. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES
Motion by Commissioner Wilson, seconded by Commissioner Bailey, to
accept the Minutes of the August 15, 2018 meeting as submitted.
Motion carried, with Commissioner Healey abstaining and Commissioner
Beach absent from the vote.
V. CONSENT AGENDA - NEW BUSINESS
A. SIMON’S ROCK, INC. requests a Special Use Permit pursuant to
Chapter 264 Schedule A of a proposal to operate a real estate office
at 832 Union Street, tax parcel # 39.74-2-8, located in an “R-3”
Multiple Family Residential District.
Peter DellaRatta appeared before the Commission.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
SEQR RESOLUTION
Motion by Commissioner Wilson, seconded by Commissioner Healey, to
accept the Negative Declaration.
Motion carried unanimously.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL
Motion by Commissioner Lewis, seconded by Commissioner Beach, to
approve the Special Use Permit based on the following findings:
1. Proposed use shall not substantially impact upon the nature and
character of the neighborhood.
2. Proposed use will not have a substantial or undue adverse effect
upon adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic
conditions, and utility facilities.
3. Nuisance will not be more objectionable than use not requiring
special use permit.
4. Use shall be served adequately by infrastructure.
5. Proposed use will not result in loss or destruction of significant
features.
6. The proposed building or use complies with all additional
requirements imposed on it by the provisions of this zoning
chapter.
And with the following conditions:
1. The address will be remain prominently displayed so that it is
easily visible from Union Street.
2. Metal roll gates and iron bars will not be permitted on any doors
or windows at any time in the future.
3. All changes to the exterior of the building and surrounding
property must be approved by the Historic District Commission.
4. Any future sign is limited to a total of 6 square feet and must be
approved by the Historic District Commission.
5. The driveway will be narrowed by enlarging the existing green
space. This will be completed by November 1, 2018.
6. Two trees will be planted on the Jackson Place side of the
property. One will be planted between the yellow post and the
walkway and another will be planted in the enlarged green space
next to the driveway. Locations of trees will be as shown on the
site plan.
7. The asphalt sidewalk will be replaced to City standards by
September 1, 2019.
Motion carried unanimously.
B. THE CAPONERA LAW FIRM, PC requests site plan approval
pursuant to Section 264-90 M of a proposal to operate a warehouse at
1125-1141 Catalyn Street, tax parcel #’s 49.80-1-29 and 30.1
respectively, located in an “M-1” Light Manufacturing and
Warehousing District and an “R-1” Single Family Residential
District.
A representative from the Caponera Law Firm appeared before the
Commission.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
SITE PLAN APPROVAL
Motion by Commissioner Lewis, seconded by Commissioner Beach, to
accept the proposal with the following conditions:
1. The address will be prominently displayed so that it is easily
visible from Catalyn Street.
2. Metal roll gates and iron bars will not be installed on any doors or
windows at any time in the future.
3. Pursuant to Section 264-49 G of the Zoning Code, the dumpsters
must be properly screened from public view. A plan for enclosing
the dumpsters will be submitted to the City Planner for final
approval prior to the installation of the enclosure. The enclosure
will be installed by December 1, 2018.
4. This property is well maintained and has a large area of existing
green space. The green spaces will be continuously maintained.
Any additional pavement will require a permit.
5. The existing street trees will be maintained and replaced by the
applicant in the future if needed.
Motion carried unanimously.
VI. NEW BUSINESS – CONTINUED
A. GREGG KELLY requests a Special Use Permit pursuant to Section
264-61 I of a proposal to install an electronic message board at
Northeastern Fine Jewelry, 1607 Union Street, tax parcel # 50.30-1-
36, located in a “C-2” Mixed Use Commercial District.
Gregg Kelly of Northeastern Fine Jewelry and Tom Wheeler of AJ Sign
Company presented the proposal.
This application was pulled from the Consent Agenda at Commissioner
Ferro’s request. Commissioner Ferro stated that he felt that the
application warranted discussion since it concerns the first electronic
message board (EMB) sign in the Upper Union Street area. He noted that
at the beginning of the meeting City Planner Primiano had handed out a
working document regarding proposed City Code restrictions for EMB
signs, and that document proposes that EMBs must be 100 feet away
from residential properties, which he noted is not the case with this sign.
Ms. Primiano noted that the proposed Code changes have not taken effect
yet. Commissioner Ferro stated that he understood, but that if this is
what the Commission is supporting in the future he does not believe that
they should be making decisions to the contrary now. He stated that he is
very concerned that this sign will be the start of many more similar
applications in the Upper Union Street area, where he does not feel that
they are appropriate.
Ms. Primiano encouraged the Commissioners to review the findings of
the proposed Special Use Permit approval and make sure that they agree
with them. For example, she stated that the first finding of fact, which
states that the “proposed use shall not substantially impact upon the
neighborhood” must be considered with regards to this unique property
and sign. Commissioner Ferro stated that he believes that the sign will
directly impact the immediately surrounding residential properties.
Commissioner Bailey stated that he shares Commissioner Ferro’s
concerns. He stated that he is aware that the Union Street Subway shop
also would like an EMB. Commissioner Wallinger stated that she also
shares the same concerns, which is why she is supporting changes to the
Code to address this issue. She added that neighborhoods have different
characters, and she does not feel like the Upper Union Street area would
be the right fit for a large number of these signs.
Commissioner Lewis stated that he believes that limiting the hours when
the sign may be used can lessen its impact significantly. He suggested
that the Commission consider requiring that the sign remain static or be
dimmed during the overnight hours. He explained that this would most
likely have little impact on the business but would make a big difference
to the surrounding residents.
Mr. Kelly stated that Northeastern Fine Jewelry started in Schenectady
and has in effect overbuilt at their current location; thus, they would not
consider leaving their current site. He noted that they are proposing to
use the current sign and simply replace the middle portion with the EMB.
Commissioner Wallinger stated that while she agrees that in this case the
sign would be as tasteful as possible, she is concerned about neighboring
businesses whose proposed EMB signs might not be appropriate.
Mr. Kelly stated that he can appreciate the Commissioners’ concerns
about the sign, but he assured them that Northeastern would not consider
a sign that they felt would compromise the integrity of their brand. Mr.
Wheeler stated that the proposed sign is the highest quality available,
explaining that it can be set to dim and remain static, and that his client is
not proposing that the sign scroll or flash or have any animation. He
noted that they would comply with the DOT change rate of not more than
every 8 seconds.
Commissioner Wallinger stated that in general the function of a sign
should be to identify the business rather than offer information
advertising special offers or products. She noted that the Upper Union
Street district has a lot of pedestrian traffic as well, which most likely will
not be the ideal audience for a sign of this type and size.
Commissioner Beach stated that he believes it is notable that the Upper
Union Street BID voted to allow the sign, since they tend to express
strong opinions regarding design of the businesses in the area. He added
that it is important that the Commissioners remember that this property is
within a city, and not a small town or village. Mr. Kelly commented that
Northeastern is a millennial-based business, as much of their business is
bridal, and they are committed to helping the Upper Union Street area
develop a more youthful and vibrant energy while also maintaining its
charming atmosphere. He stated that they feel that the sign is a
contemporary way to represent the business while also being tasteful.
Commissioner Healey stated that he agrees with Commissioner Beach
that the Upper Union Street area is a business district within a city, and
not a main street in a small village. He added that as the Code stands
now the sign is allowed, and he believes that it meets the criteria of the
Special Use Permit.
Commissioner Wallinger stated that she appreciated Mr. Kelly’s
comments and believes that they will make the sign as tasteful as
possible. She asked Mr. Wheeler to give some more details about the
sign. Mr. Wheeler stated that the sign will be the highest quality
Watchfire brand sign and will have a high definition video display like
the newest televisions and computer screens. He added that the sign is
fully programable and the programs can be easily changed.
Commissioner Wallinger asked Commissioner Bailey if he had any
additional concerns. Commissioner Bailey stated that he believes that the
applicants are doing their best to incorporate the EMB in the most
tasteful, unobtrusive way possible, and he does not object to its use in this
case. He added that he agrees with Commissioner Beach that this is a
business district within a city, and that should also be considered, along
with the fact that the BID approved the sign. Commissioner Ferro stated
that he would hesitate to weigh the bid approval too heavily, as perhaps
other members of the BID also would like to have an EMB in the future.
He stated that he could support the sign if it were required that it remain
static overnight. The Commissioners discussed possible time limits and
it was decided that the sign should remain static between the hours of 9
p.m. and 7 a.m. Commissioner Wilson stated that he has no objection to
this particular sign, as it is the highest quality and incorporated well into
the existing sign design. He noted that people who live in a mixed use
district should expect some commercial activity, as that is by definition
what the district is - mixed commercial and residential uses.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
SEQR RESOLUTION
Motion by Commissioner Wilson, seconded by Commissioner Healey, to
accept the Negative Declaration.
Motion carried unanimously.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL
Motion by Commissioner Beach, seconded by Commissioner Wilson, to
approve the Special Use Permit based on the following findings:
1. Proposed use shall not substantially impact upon the nature and
character of the neighborhood. Please note that on August 17,
2018 the Upper Union Street Business Improvement District
president notified the City that the BID members voted to
approve/allow the electronic sign proposed by Northeastern
Fine Jewelry.
2. Proposed use will not have a substantial or undue adverse effect
upon adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic
conditions, and utility facilities.
3. Nuisance will not be more objectionable than use not requiring
special use permit.
4. Use shall be served adequately by infrastructure.
5. Proposed use will not result in loss or destruction of significant
features.
6. The proposed building or use complies with all additional
requirements imposed on it by the provisions of this zoning
chapter.
And with the following conditions:
1. The electronic sign message rate of change will be consistent with
what is permitted by the New York State Department of
Transportation, with a change rate of every 8 seconds, not the rate
proposed by the applicant of every 6 seconds.
2. Messaging will be limited to advertisement related to the business
on site i.e. Northeastern Fine Jewelry, and community events
only.
3. The sign will remain static between the hours of 9 p.m. to 7 a.m.
Motion carried unanimously.
B. PENNROSE PROPERTIES, LLC requests site plan approval
pursuant to Section 264-90 F of a proposal to construct Phase I of the
redevelopment of new housing and a community center at Yates
Village, 2450 Van Vranken Avenue, tax parcel # 30.84-2-1, located in
an “R-3” Multiple Family Residential District.
Luigi Palleschi of ABD Engineers and Surveyors, Rich Homenick,
Executive Director of the Schenectady Municipal Housing Authority, and
Alex Morris, Bruce Chamberlain, and Keiko Cramer of Wallace, Roberts
& Todd presented the project.
Mr. Palleschi explained that since the August meeting they had
incorporated the discussed changes into the site plan. He reviewed the
site plans and noted that they had made the suggested changes to the
sidewalks and landscaping. He explained that they had also moved the
boundary line of Phase I slightly forward, so that new pull-in angled
parking would be incorporated on Equality Court and Willow Lane. Mr.
Palleschi stated that the applicants are currently working with National
Grid regarding final utility placement. He also pointed out that they had
decided to install a hydrodynamic unit for stormwater management, thus
allowing the green areas between the building to be graded less
drastically and be used for recreational purposes rather than primarily as
catch basins.
Mr. Morris briefly reviewed the goals and history of the project. He
introduced Ms. Cramer, landscape architect for the project, who reviewed
the different green space concepts and the proposed landscape materials
to be used. Mr. Homenick commented that at the Commission’s
suggestion they are working with ReTree Schenectady to secure funding
for the added trees.
Mr. Chamberlin reviewed the elevation drawings and passed around
material samples. He explained that three colors of vinyl siding and brick
will be used on the residential buildings, along with some vertical siding
for interest, and noted how the building have been designed with gabled
ends and covered porches to relate to the existing housing designs in the
neighborhood. He stated that the trim color will be an off-white or
cream. Mr. Chamberlain also reviewed the Community Center design,
which will incorporate separate entrances for all four major tenants: The
Boys & Girls Club, Head Start, Bethesda House, and the residential
amenities and offices. He presented the materials for the Community
Center, which will include a darker brick and a smooth finish fiber-
cement siding. City Planner Primiano asked if the brick proposed on the
housing units and Community Center will be real brick and not brick
tiles. Mr. Chamberlin confirmed that it will be real brick.
Commissioner Wallinger stated that she greatly appreciates the applicants
taking the Commission’s comments and suggestions to heart and doing
their best to incorporate them into the final plan. She added that she is
very happy with the addition of more trees to the plan and suggested that
in the new angles parking areas along Equality Court and Willow Lane
there appears to be space to add more shade trees. The Commissioners
agreed. Mr. Palleschi stated that this would be a good idea and the trees
would be added to the final site plan. Commissioner Healey stated that
he believes it would be helpful to have signage designating that Willow
Lane and Equality Court are now one way. The applicants stated that the
signage would be part of the final site plan.
Ms. Primiano asked what the plan is for garbage storage. Mr. Palleschi
stated that garbage storage areas will be built so that the garbage
containers are screened from view and the enclosures will blend well
with the buildings. Commissioner Wallinger stated that obviously the
garbage should be away from prominent entrances or frequently traveled
areas on the site. She stated that she would like the final plan for the
enclosures to be submitted to Ms. Primiano for approval. The
Commissioners agreed.
Ms. Primiano thanked the design team for working so well with City staff
and the Commission. She stated that the new residential buildings have
been designed very well to both fit in with the surrounding neighborhood
and be visually interesting and attractive. She added that the final
designs for the Community Center are very impressive and the whole
project will be a positive addition to the area. The Commissioners
concurred.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
SEQR RESOLUTION
Motion by Commissioner Wilson, seconded by Commissioner Lewis, to
accept the Negative Declaration.
Motion carried unanimously.
SITE PLAN APPROVAL
Motion by Commissioner Beach, seconded by Commissioner Lewis, to
accept the proposal with the following conditions:
1. Shade trees will be added to the parking areas along Equality
Court and Willow Lane.
2. The final plans for the trash enclosures will be submitted to the
City Planner for approval.
3. One-way signage will be added to the corners of Equality Court
and Willow Lane.
4. Final site plans and elevations showing all changes discussed at
the meeting will be submitted to the City Planner. If, during
construction of Phase I, changes to the approved plans become
necessary the applicants will return to the City Planner, and if the
changes are deemed significant enough, to the Commission, for
further review.
Motion carried unanimously.
C. JOHNNY BROWN, JR requests site plan approval pursuant to
Section 264-90 M of a proposal to operate a restaurant at 964
Emmett Street, tax parcel # 49.50-2-50.1, located in a “C-2” Mixed
Use Commercial District.
Johnny Brown Jr. presented the proposal.
Mr. Brown stated that he plans to serve breakfast and lunch at the
restaurant. Commissioner Wallinger explained that, as noted in the Staff
Report, landscaping must be added to the site. She commented that the
additional landscaping in front of the building will hopefully eliminate
the problem of cars parking illegally on the sidewalk. City Planner
Primiano noted that the tire stops in that area must be removed. The
proposed changes were discussed, and Mr. Brown communicated that he
has no objection to the conditions of site plan approval. Ms. Primiano
stated that Mr. Brown should explain to the property owner that these
changes will have to be made to the property regardless of who his
prospective tenant is.
Ms. Primiano asked Mr. Brown if he plans to leave the Brandywine Diner
sign on the building. Mr. Brown stated that he does.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
SITE PLAN APPROVAL
Motion by Commissioner Healey, seconded by Commissioner Bailey, to
accept the proposal with the following conditions:
1. The address will be prominently displayed so that it is easily
visible from Emmett Street.
2. Metal gates and iron bars will not be installed on any doors or
windows at any time in the future.
3. The proposed business requires a Certificate of Use.
4. All peeling and chipping paint throughout the building is a code
violation and must be repaired prior to the opening of the business
or by November 1, 2018.
5. No parking in the front yard is permitted at any time. The
existing tire stops will be removed prior to the opening of the
business.
6. Two flowering trees will be planted in front of the building and
three trees will be planted in the utility strip area along Emmett
Street. A 5’x5’ square of asphalt will be removed for each tree.
In the front of the building, one tree will be planted in line with
the corners of the building and in the middle of the paved area
(see site plan). On Emmett Street, the 3 trees will be evenly
spaced and planted in the utility strip.
7. If the applicant plans to have outdoor seating, a plan for how it
will be installed will be submitted to the City Planner for approval
prior to installation.
8. All overgrown weeds in front of the building, along the side, and
in the parking lot will be removed, along with all the garbage
throughout the site, prior to the opening of the business. It is a
requirement that the property be continuously maintained and
clear of trash and debris.
9. Pursuant to Section 264-49 G of the Zoning Code, the dumpster
must be properly enclosed, locked, and always screened from
public view. All refuse containers must be kept within the
dumpster enclosure. The applicant must submit a plan for the
enclosure to the City Planner for approval prior to installation.
The enclosure must be installed prior to the opening of the
business.
10. Parking on the Emmett Street sidewalk is not permitted at any
time.
Motion carried unanimously.
D. KHALIL SALIM requests site plan approval pursuant to Section
264-90 B and F of a proposal to redevelop the property into retail,
residential, and a workshop at 1016 State Street, tax parcel # 49.42-3-
9.11, located in a “C-2” Mixed Use Commercial District.
Khalil Salim presented the proposal.
Mr. Salim explained that he plans to rent the front of the building for a
retail space, have apartments upstairs, and use the rear of the building for
a workshop for his plumbing business, Discount Plumbing and Heating.
Commissioner Wallinger asked what plans he has for the exterior of the
building. Mr. Salim stated that he plans to repoint the brick, repaint the
entire exterior, replace all the windows, and perhaps install a flag pole.
City Planner Primiano noted that Mr. Salim should submit the proposed
exterior colors to her for final approval. Mr. Salim agreed.
Commissioner Wallinger asked if Mr. Salim has any objection to planting
street trees along the rear (Albany Street) side of the property. Mr. Salim
stated that he does not.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
SEQR RESOLUTION
Motion by Commissioner Lewis, seconded by Commissioner Healey, to
accept the Negative Declaration.
Motion carried unanimously.
SITE PLAN APPROVAL
Motion by Commissioner Wilson, seconded by Commissioner Healey, to
accept the proposal with the following conditions:
1. The address will be prominently displayed so that it is easily
visible from State Street.
2. Metal gates and iron bars will not be installed on any doors or
windows at any time in the future.
3. The applicant will submit paint colors for the building to the City
Planner for approval prior to painting the building.
4. All windows will be restored to glass and will be aluminum
storefront quality windows. No vinyl windows are permitted.
5. Landscaping will be added to the front and rear of the property.
Large planters will be constructed along the front of the building
below the front windows. Evergreen shrubs will be planted in the
planters and continuously maintained. In the rear, pavement will
be removed adjacent to the fencing and a combination of grass,
shrubbery, and street trees will be planted. The landscaping bed
will be a minimum of 5 feet wide and will run the length of the
rear fence from the driveway to the eastern side of the property.
A landscaping plan will be submitted to the City Planner for final
approval prior to the installation of the landscaping. Landscaping
will be complete by July 1, 2019.
6. Parking spaces will be delineated in the rear parking lot and in
front of the building. The applicant will submit the parking plan
to the City Planner for final approval prior to painting the parking
spaces.
7. A dumpster will be located in the rear of the building. Pursuant to
Section 264-49G, the dumpster will be properly enclosed, locked,
and screened from public view. The enclosure must be installed
by July 1, 2019.
8. All future signs must be submitted to the City Planner for final
approval prior to the purchase and fabrication of the sign(s).
9. The existing flag pole will either be removed as such or removed
in its entirety.
Motion carried unanimously.
E. MARDEN NAEEM requests site plan approval pursuant to Section
264-90 M of a proposal to operate a convenience store at 951 State
Street, tax parcel # 49.34-3-33, located in a “C-2” Mixed Use
Commercial District.
Marden Naeem presented the proposal.
Prior to the beginning of the discussion City Planner Primiano explained
that Mr. Naeem has been doing business at this location for ten years and
has been granted Certificate of Use licenses several times, but it was
recently discovered that he had never received site plan approval. She
noted that he has maintained the property well over the years and the site
has not been a problem in the neighborhood.
Mr. Naeem asked if it would be permissible to install raised bed planters
instead of removing large sections of the asphalt. Commissioner
Wallinger stated that she would have no objection to the planters as long
as they are at least 15” deep, thus giving the plants a chance to establish
adequate root systems. The Commissioners agreed, and the location of
the planters was discussed. It was determined that one would be installed
in the front of the store between the ice machine and the front door and
would come out approximately three feet from the building front.
Commissioner Wallinger suggested that the second planter be installed
toward the rear of the property on the side by the stairway and the
parking lot. Mr. Naeem agreed.
Ms. Primiano asked Mr. Naeem to clarify how he stores the garbage on-
site. Mr. Naeem responded that he stores cardboard inside until it is
picked up, and for other trash he has rolling cans that are stored at the
rear of the building out of sight. Ms. Primiano stated that this is
acceptable. She commented that should a dumpster ever be necessary it
would have to be enclosed to City Code.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
SITE PLAN APPROVAL
Motion by Commissioner Beach, seconded by Commissioner Bailey, to
accept the proposal with the following conditions:
1. The address will remain prominently displayed so that it is easily
visible from State Street.
2. Metal roll gates and iron bars will not be permitted on any door or
window at any time in the future.
3. A Certificate of Use License is required to operate the business.
4. As discussed at the meeting, two raised planting beds of at least
15” depth will be installed, one at the front of the building and
one on the rear side. The beds will include shrubbery and
perennials and will be maintained continuously. In addition to the
planting beds a street tree will be planted on the side of the
property. The applicant shall submit landscaping plans to the City
Planner by October 1, 2018 and the landscaping, as approved, will
be installed by November 1, 2018.
5. The abandoned pay phone will be removed by November 1, 2018.
Motion carried unanimously.
F. TEEKAH LACHMAN requests site plan approval pursuant to
Section 264-90 B and F of a proposal to redevelop 1151 Hilderbrandt
Avenue into a 9-unit apartment building, tax parcel # 49.34-2-18,
located in an “R-2” Two Family Residential District.
Teekah Lachman presented the proposal.
Mr. Lachman explained that he plans to fully renovate the building into
nine residential units, with three units on each floor. He stated that the
building is currently 11 units, but because it had been vacant and is
within an “R-2” Two-Family zoning district he had to seek a variance for
the nine units. The variance was granted in February 2018. Mr.
Lachman stated that he plans no major changes to the exterior of the
building, other than cleaning it up. He added that he purchased the vacant
lot at 18 Moyston Street and originally planned to use it for parking, but
it is not big enough, so he plans to use it as a greenspace for the tenants.
City Planner Primiano noted that the brick exterior of the building is
partially painted. Mr. Lachman stated that if at all possible he plans to
remove the paint and restore the original exterior, but if necessary he will
paint the entire building. Ms. Primiano stated that the preferable
alternative would be to remove the paint and offered to help Mr.
Lachman research the best way to do so. The Commissioners agreed that
leaving the original brick would be the preferable alternative. Ms.
Primiano noted that if Mr. Lachman were to decide to paint the entire
building he would have to return the Commission for approval of the
paint colors. Ms. Primiano asked if the windows will be replaced. Mr.
Lachman stated that they will be.
The front entrance and porch areas were discussed next. Mr. Lachman
stated that the platforms of the porches are cast concrete, and thus will
remain. Ms. Primiano stated that the current stone porch wall is not high
enough to meet code and were most likely not original to the building.
Commissioner Wilson suggested that rather than try to repair the stone
Mr. Lachman instead use a metal railing that would echo the metal used
in the porch roofs. Commissioner Wilson asked if the porch roofs will be
repaired. Mr. Lachman stated that they will be. The Commissioners
agreed that the metal railing would be the best design for the restored
porches.
Commissioner Wallinger asked if Mr. Lachman had decided on a color
for the front doors. Mr. Lachman stated that he would like to paint them
cream or off-white. Commissioner Wallinger state that she would just
encourage him not to use a stark white, which tends to look dirty very
quickly. Ms. Primiano asked if the cornice is cast metal. Mr. Lachman
stated that it is, and that it is generally in good shape.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Leese and Ernest Burnett of 1167-1169 Moyston Street spoke in
opposition to the proposal. Mrs. Burnett stated that they have owned
their residence for more than forty years and their neighborhood has been
in severe decline for some time. She stated that she does not believe that
a nine-unit building will improve an area that is already crowded and
having problems with crime and neglect.
Ms. Primiano explained to the Burnetts that the use of the building has
already been approved by the BZA and the issues within the Planning
Commission’s purview relate to the design of the site. She added that the
Commission will do everything within their purview to address the issues
they mentioned.
A letter from Patricia Bryan of 24 Moyston Street was read into the
record by Commissioner Wallinger. Ms. Bryan stated her opposition to
the project, stating that she believes that adding to the density of the
neighborhood will only bring more problems. She commented that she
believes the City should have torn the building down rather than sell it to
Mr. Lachman.
Seeing no one else from the public who wished to speak, Commissioner
Wallinger closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Wallinger asked Mr. Lachman if he would like to address
the comments made by the Burnetts. Mr. Lachman stated that he is
investing a lot of his own money in the building, and he is doing it to
improve the neighborhood, where his Aunt currently lives. He added that
he will only be renting to long-term tenants who will be working people,
not transients or criminals. He noted that he has purchased the property
to construct a parking lot so that his tenants will not add to the crowded
on-street parking and has purchased 18 Moyston Street and is under
contract to purchase 27 Moyston Street, both of which will be used as
secure outdoor space for his tenants.
Commissioner Wallinger stated that there should be some screening
between the first parking space and the street. She suggested a four-foot
fence with some landscaping in front of it, and a small tree.
Commissioner Wallinger asked the Burnetts is they would prefer a fence,
as the parking lot is directly across the street from their house. They
stated that they would. Commissioner Wallinger stated that the final
landscaping plan for the parking lot should be submitted to Ms. Primiano
for approval.
SITE PLAN APPROVAL
Motion by Commissioner Ferro, seconded by Commissioner Bailey, to
accept the proposal with the following conditions:
1. The address will be prominently displayed so that it is easily
visible from Hilderbrandt Street.
2. Metal gates and iron bars will not be installed on any doors or
windows at any time in the future.
3. The applicant will submit the paint colors for the building and
doors to the City Planner for approval prior to painting the
building. The applicant will work with City staff to formulate a
plan to remove the existing paint from the brick. It is preferable
to the Commission that the body of the building remain unpainted
brick.
4. The plan for the restoration of the porch and installation of metal
railings will be submitted to the City Planner for final approval.
5. Three small flowering trees will be added to the perimeter of the
property and the sidewalk will be cleaned.
G. TEEKAH LACHMAN requests a Special Use Permit pursuant to
Chapter 264 Schedule A of a proposal to establish 15 parking spaces
at 1164 Hilderbrandt Avenue to serve a 9-unit apartment building at
1151 Hilderbrandt Avenue, tax parcel # 49.34-2-10, located in an “R-
2” Two Family Residential District.
This item was discussed together with item F, 1151 Hilderbrandt Avenue.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Please see Item F above.
SEQR RESOLUTION
Motion by Commissioner Bailey, seconded by Commissioner Wilson, to
accept the Negative Declaration.
Motion carried unanimously.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL
Motion by Commissioner Ferro, seconded by Commissioner Bailey, to
approve the Special Use Permit based on the following findings:
1. Proposed use shall not substantially impact upon the nature and
character of the neighborhood.
2. Proposed use will not have a substantial or undue adverse effect
upon adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic
conditions, and utility facilities.
3. Nuisance will not be more objectionable than use not requiring
special use permit.
4. Use shall be served adequately by infrastructure.
5. Proposed use will not result in loss or destruction of significant
features.
6. The proposed building or use complies with all additional
requirements imposed on it by the provisions of this zoning
chapter.
And with the following condition:
1. A decorative fence with a landscaped bed in front of it will be
installed behind the sidewalk to screen the parking lot from the
street. The landscaping will include low shrubs and one small
tree. The applicant will submit a landscaping plan and the fence
design to the City Planner for approval prior to installation.
Motion carried unanimously.
VII. OLD BUSINESS
City Planner Primiano disseminated to the Commissioners potential changes
to the Zoning Code regarding electronic message board signs. The
Commissioners further discussed the possible changes and how the signs
could best be considered in different zoning districts. Commissioner Wilson
suggested that the design of the signs themselves should be considered, i.e.
allowing only the highest quality resolution. The Commissioners agreed.
Commissioner Wallinger asked Counselor Ward if it would be within the
Commission’s purview to ask the City Council to impose a six-month
moratorium on the installation of any electronic message board signs, thus
giving the Commission time to further work on the specific proposed
language for the code changes. Counselor Ward stated that it would be.
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
Motion by Commissioner Beach, seconded by Commissioner Wilson, to
recommend to the City Council that they place a six-month moratorium on
the installation of any new electronic message board signs within the City.
VIII. MISCELLANEOUS
None.
IX. MOTION TO ADJOURN
Motion by Commissioner Beach, seconded by Commissioner Healey, to
adjourn the meeting.
Motion carried unanimously.
Meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Agenda
City of Schenectady
NEW YORK
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
Room 14, City Hall, Jay Street
Schenectady, NY 12305-1938
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the City of Schenectady Planning Commission will conduct a
regularly scheduled meeting at 6:30 PM on Wednesday, September 19, 2018 in Room 110, City Hall,
105 Jay Street, Schenectady, NY 12305.
I. NEW BUSINESS
A. PENNROSE PROPERTIES, LLC requests site plan approval pursuant to Section 264-90
F of a proposal to construct Phase I of the redevelopment of new housing and a community
center at Yates Village, 2450 Van Vranken Avenue, tax parcel # 30.84-2-1, located in an
"R-3" Multiple Family Residential District.
B. BONNIE GOODWIN requests site plan approval pursuant to Section 264-90 A of a
proposal to redevelop the property at 764.5 Eastern Avenue into an Italian restaurant, tax
parcel # 39.74-3-18, located in an "R-2" Two Family Residential District.
C. KHALIL SALIM requests site plan approval pursuant to Section 264-90 B and F of a
proposal to redevelop the property into retail, residential, and a workshop at 1016 State
Street, tax parcel # 49.42-3-9.11, located in a "C-2" Mixed Use Commercial District.
D. TEEKAH LACHMAN requests site plan approval pursuant to Section 264-90 B and F of a
proposal to redevelop 1151 Hilderbrandt Avenue into a 9 unit apartment building, tax parcel
# 49.34-2-18, located in an "R-2" Two Family Residential District.
E. TEEKAH LACHMAN requests a Special Use Permit pursuant to Chapter 264 Schedule A
of a proposal to establish 15 parking spaces at 1164 Hilderbrandt Avenue to serve the 9 unit
apartment building at 1151Hilderbrandt Avenue, tax parcel # 49.34-2-10, located in an "R-2"
Two Family Residential District.
F. 1004 UNION STREET INC. requests a Special Use Permit pursuant to Chapter 264
Schedule A of a proposal to operate a real estate office at 832 Union Street, tax parcel #
39.74-2-8, located in an "R-3" Multiple Family Residential District.
G. GREGG KELLY requests a Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 264-61 I of a proposal
to install an electronic message board at Northeastern Fine Jewelry, 1607 Union Street, tax
parcel # 50.30-1-36, located in a "C-2" Mixed Use Commercial District.
H. UNION COLLEGE requests site plan approval pursuant to Section 264-90 M of a proposal
to redevelop the property at 631-645 Nott Street to operate the Union College Campus
Safety facility, tax parcel #'s 39.58-1-11&13, located in a "C-2" Mixed Use Commercial
District.
I. THE CAPONERA LAW FIRM, PC requests site plan approval pursuant to Section
264-90 M of a proposal to operate a warehouse at 1125-1141 Catalyn Street, tax parcel #'s
49.80-1-29 and 30.1 respectively, located in an "M-1" Light Manufacturing and
Warehousing District and "R-1" Single Family Residential District.
J. JOHNNY BROWN JR requests site plan approval pursuant to Section 264-90 M of a
proposal to operate a restaurant at 964 Emmett Street, tax parcel # 49.50-2-50.1, located in a
"C-2" Mixed Use Commercial District.
K. MARDAN NAEEM requests site plan approval pursuant to Section 264-90 M of a proposal
to operate a convenience store at 951 State Street, tax parcel # 49.34-3-33, located in a "C-2"
Mixed Use Commercial District.
II. OLD BUSINESS
III. MISCELLANEOUS
IV. ADJOURN
Page 1 of 1
Get email alerts for Schenectady
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.