Muyni
← Back to Schenectady

Zoning Board of Appeals

Regular Meeting

Schenectady, NY · January 10, 2024

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

Schenectady Board of Zoning Appeals Minutes January 10, 2024 I. CALL TO ORDER Commissioner Gleason called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. After calling the meeting to order, Commissioner Gleason explained to the members of the public how the consideration of the applications would proceed. He stated that the applicants would have an opportunity to make their presentation to the Board, followed by any members of the public who would like to speak in favor of the application. Next, any members of the public in opposition to the application would be invited to speak, followed by any further discussion or questions the Board Members wished to put forth prior to the vote. He added that after the initial presentation of the proposal the applicant would not be given another opportunity to comment unless directly questioned by a Board Member. The meeting is being recorded. II. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Jim Gleason, Chair; Dave Connelly, Vice Chair; Mary Zawacki, Helene Lester and Brendan Keller, Jack Connelly- Department of Development staff, Maxine Barasch, Corporation Counsel, III. EXCUSED: Mary D’Alessandro-Gilmore IV. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CHECK None. V. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES The minutes were approved for the December 13th, 2023 meeting. The motion was made by Commissioner Connelly and seconded by Commissioner Lester. The motion carried unanimously. IV. Old Business V. Applications: New Business A. Michael Boland and Elizabeth Pitt request a use variance for 1592 Union Street (tax parcel # 50.32-2-11) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for the conversion of a single family home into a two family home, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule A. Ms. Liz Pitt and Mr. Michael Boland came before the Board to discuss the nature of their use variance request. It was noted that although the property was in an R-2 district, Schedule A of the zoning code does not allow for the conversion of existing single family homes into two- family units, which is why a use variance was needed. Ms. Pitt detailed that there was a mother-in-law suite on the rear of the property. The suite shared utilities with the rest of the house, and Ms. Pitt planned on living in that section with Mr. Boland while renting out the remainder of the house. Commissioner Keller asked if the applicants had any prior knowledge of the zoning rules regarding this property before purchasing. The applicants stated that they had multiple conversations with the City’s Zoning Enforcement Officer and Building Department as well as their own private attorney, all of whom confirmed that the conversion of a two family house would be permissible in the R-2 zone. Ms. Pitt showed an email from the Zoning Enforcement Officer received in January of 2023 stating that the conversion would be permissible. Although this email was sent two weeks after the purchase of the property, the Board believed this spoke to the nature of conversations had prior to the property being bought. After internal discussion, the Board determined that this situation was not self-created as they had received false information from the City, and the property also met the reasonable return criteria as the property never would have been purchased if conversion was known to be illegal and the applicants were financially restrained as a result of not being able to rent out the second unit. The Board mentioned that most of this section of Union Street was either two family houses or houses that had businesses, and therefore the character of the neighborhood would be unaffected by this approval. Mr. Connelly read a letter into the record from Sarupinder Singh who owns 1590 Union Street, and stated that there was no objection to the approval of this use variance. SEQR RESOLUTION Commissioner Connelly made a motion to declare the application a Type II SEQR. Commissioner Lester seconded the motion. The motion was approved unanimously. USE VARIANCE APPROVAL Commissioner Connelly made a motion to grant the use variance as requested. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Keller. 1. The applicant cannot realize a reasonable return with the current allowed uses 2. The alleged hardship related to the property is unique to the district and neighborhood 3. The granting of the use variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood 4. The alleged hardship has not been self-created The motion was approved unanimously. B. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 555 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.1), 557 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.1), 549 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.2), 550 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-2-20.2), 548 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-2-20.3), 546 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-2-18.1), 528 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-2-9.1), 516 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-2-4.1), 504 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.24-2-21), 502 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.24-2-20.1), 430 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-2-18.1), 422 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.24-2-14.1), 420 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.24-2-13.1), 416 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.24-2-11.1), 364 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.24-3-47), 347 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.24-4-3.1), 503 Mumford Street “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.32-1-7.1), 497 Mumford Street “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.32-1-10.11) and 417 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.32-2-6.1) to all in R-1 and R-2 Single Family and Two Family Residential Districts, to allow for a larger front yard setback than the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C. C. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 555 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.1), 557 Summit Avenue “A” (tax parcel # 49.31-3- 44.1), 549 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.2), 550 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-2-20.2), 548 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-2-20.3), 546 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-2- 18.1), 528 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-2-9.1), 516 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-2-4.1), 504 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.24-2-21), 502 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.24-2- 20.1), 430 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-2-18.1), 422 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.24-2-14.1), 420 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.24-2-13.1), 416 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.24-2- 11.1), 364 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.24-3-47), 347 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.24-4-3.1), 503 Mumford Street “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.32-1-7.1), 497 Mumford Street “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.32-1- 10.11) and 417 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.32-2-6.1) to all in R-1 and R-2 Single Family and Two Family Residential Districts, to allow for less than 40 feet of street frontage, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C. D. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 557 Summit Avenue “A” and “B” (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.1) to allow for a 16’ and 17.3’ rear setback where 25’ is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C. Mr. Damien Pinto-Martin came forward as the representative for AIKMLB Holdings to discuss the 77 requested variances. Mr. Pinto-Martin noted for the Board that AIKMLB had come before the BZA previously for similar variance, but due to changes in their plans they needed to return. Mr. Pinto-Martin described that it was important to their project that the houses be subdivided down the middle, to allow for individual ownership on each half of the house. In working with the Capital Region Landbank, it became necessary that the properties be subdivided this way which meant that the front setback variances previously received were no longer applicable. Additionally, with each parcel being split down the middle only one parcel (557 Summit Avenue “B”) met the 40 feet of frontage necessary to appease code. Therefore, the rest of the properties needed frontage variances. Mr. Pinto-Martin told the Board that subdivision approval had been granted at the most recent Planning Commission meeting, and besides this one change there were no further differentiations from the last time the application came before the BZA. As Commissioner Gleason opened the public comment portion, Ms. Marion Porterfield of 842 Strong Street came forward to ask clarifying questions. Ms. Porterfield identified herself as both a neighbor to the project as well as President of the City Council, and expressed support for the project as a whole but questioned the creation of the SBL numbers and when that would happen, along with the addresses as they were currently listed as “A” and “B” for the subdivided parcels. Mr. Pinto-Martin said that both of Ms. Porterfield’s concerns were noted and would be addressed after all approvals were given. The specific mailing addresses had not yet been determined, and it was likely that the “A” and “B” format would be temporary. Mr. Connelly requested that when the official addresses were established they be sent to the Department of Development for official records. Nobody else from the public spoke, causing Commissioner Gleason to close the public hearing. As the Board members spoke amongst themselves, they agreed that these requests were no different from what was previously approved, and there was no reason to deny the requests now. SEQR RESOLUTION Commissioner Connelly made a motion to declare the application a Type II SEQR. Commissioner Lester seconded the motion. The motion was approved unanimously. AREA VARIANCE APPROVAL Commissioner Keller made a motion to grant the area variances to agenda items B-ZZZ as requested. Seconded by Commissioner Connelly. 1. The changes sought by the applicant will not produce an undesirable change to the neighborhood 2. The area variance is the only reasonable method of achieving the applicant’s goals 3. The variance is substantial, however will not detract from the character of the neighborhood 4. There will be no adverse effect on the physical or environmental nature of the neighborhood 5. The hardship is self-created but should not detract from these variances The motion was approved unanimously. VI. Other Business VII. Adjourn 7:23 p.m. motion made by Commissioner Connelly and seconded by Commissioner Keller. The motion was approved unanimously.

Agenda

City of Schenectady NEW YORK Board of Zoning Appeals Room 206, City Hall, Jay Street Schenectady, NY 12305-1938 To: Board of Zoning Appeals From: The Department of Development Subject: Regular Meeting, Wednesday, January 10th, 2024, at 6:30 PM, City Hall, Room 110 I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Review of Last Meetings' Minutes A. Review and approve the December 13 meeting minutes. IV. Applications: New Business A. Michael Boland and Elizabeth Pitt request a use variance for 1592 Union Street (tax parcel # 50.30-2-11) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for the conversion of a single family home into a two family home, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule A B. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 557 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.1) located in an R-1 Single-Family Residential District to allow for a 16 foot rear setback where 25 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C C. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 557 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.1) located in an R-1 Single-Family Residential District to allow for a 17.3 foot rear setback where 25 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C D. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 555 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.1) located in an R-1 Single-Family Residential District to allow for a 25.7 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C E. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 555 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.1) located in an R-1 Single-Family Residential District to allow for a 25.7 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C F. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 557 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.1) located in an R-1 Single-Family Residential District to allow for a 17.5 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C G. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 557 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.1) located in an R-1 Single-Family Residential District to allow for a 17.5 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 253 Schedule C H. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 549 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.2) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 25.5 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C I. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 549 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.3) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 31.3 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C J. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 550 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-20.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 37.8 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C K. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 550 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-20.2) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 37.8 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C L. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 548 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-20.3) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 36.6 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C M. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 548 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-20.4) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 36.6 front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C N. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 546 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-18.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 22.3 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C O. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 546 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-18.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 21.1 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C P. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 528 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-9.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 23 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C Q. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 528 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-9.2) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 23 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C R. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 516 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-4.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 21.2 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C S. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 516 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-4.2) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 21.2 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C T. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 504 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-21) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 23 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C U. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 504 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-22) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 23 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C V. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 502 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-20.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 22.6 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C W. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 502 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-20.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 22.6 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C X. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 430 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-18.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 20.9 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C Y. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 430 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-18,1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 20.9 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C Z. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 422 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-14.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 21.1 front setback where 5 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C AA. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 422 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-14.2) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 21.1 foot front setback where 5 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C BB. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 420 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-13.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 21.2 foot front setback where 5 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C CC. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 420 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-13.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 21.2 front setback where 5 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C DD. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 416 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-11.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 20.8 foot front setback where 5 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C EE. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 416 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-11.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 20.5 foot front setback where 5 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C FF. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 364 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-3-47) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 20.6 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C GG. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 364 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-3-47) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 20.6 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C HH. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance 347 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-4-3.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 20.2 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C II. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance 347 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-4-3.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 18.7 foot front setback where 6 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C JJ. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 503 “A” Mumford Street (tax parcel # 49.32-1-7.1) located in an R-1 Single-Family Residential District to allow for a 25.4 foot front setback where 2 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C KK. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 503 “B” Mumford Street (tax parcel # 49.32-1-7.1) located in an R-1 Single-Family Residential District to allow for a 25.4 foot front setback where 2 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C LL. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 497 “A” Mumford Street (tax parcel # 49.32-1-10.11) located in an R-1 Single-Family Residential District to allow for a 25.4 foot front setback where 2 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C MM. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 497 “B” Mumford Street (tax parcel # 49.32-1-10.11) located in an R-1 Single-Family Residential District to allow for a 25.4 foot front setback where 2 feet is the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C NN. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 417 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.32-2-6.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 21 foot front setback where 5 feet are the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C OO. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 417 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.32-2-6.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for a 21 foot front setback where 5 feet are the maximum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C PP. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 555 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.1) located in an R-1 Single-Family Residential District to allow for 25.9 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C QQ. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 555 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.1) located in an R-1 Single-Family Residential District to allow for 31.7 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C RR. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 557 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.1) located in an R-1 Single-Family Residential District to allow for 36.5 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C SS. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 549 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.2) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 34.9 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C TT. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 549 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-3-44.3) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 29 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C UU. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 550 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-20.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 27.1 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C VV. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 550 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-20.2) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 27.3 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C WW. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 548 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-20.3) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 27.5 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C XX. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 548 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-20.4) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 28.5 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C YY. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 546 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-18.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 23.3 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C ZZ. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 546 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-18.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 24.8 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C AAA. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 528 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-9.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 26 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C BBB. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 528 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-9.2) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 26 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C CCC. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 516 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-4.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 37.3 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C DDD. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 516 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-4.2) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 37.7 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C EEE. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 504 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-21) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 24.4 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C FFF. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 504 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-22) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 25.4 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C GGG. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 502 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-20.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 26.2 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C HHH. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 502 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-20.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 27.6 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C III. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 430 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-18.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 32.1 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C JJJ. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 430 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.31-2-18,1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 37.6 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C KKK. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 422 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-14.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 31.3 feet of lot frontage where 40 is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C LLL. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 422 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-14.2) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 31.7 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C MMM. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 420 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-13.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 34.2 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C NNN. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 420 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-13.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 34.3 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C OOO. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 416 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-11.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 32.8 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C PPP. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 416 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-2-11.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 31 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C QQQ. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 364 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-3-47) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 39.1 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C RRR. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 364 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-3-47) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 30.3 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C SSS. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance 347 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-4-3.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 29.1 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet are the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C TTT. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance 347 “B” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.24-4-3.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 31 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet are the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C UUU. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 503 “A” Mumford Street (tax parcel # 49.32-1-7.1) located in an R-1 Single-Family Residential District to allow for 34.8 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet are the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C VVV. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 503 “B” Mumford Street (tax parcel # 49.32-1-7.1) located in an R-1 Single-Family Residential District to allow for 31.8 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet are the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C WWW. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 497 “A” Mumford Street (tax parcel # 49.32-1-10.11) located in an R-1 Single-Family Residential District to allow for 33.3 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C XXX. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 497 “B” Mumford Street (tax parcel # 49.32-1-10.11) located in an R-1 Single-Family Residential District to allow for 33.3 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C YYY. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 417 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.32-2-6.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 33.5 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C ZZZ. AIKMLB Holdings LLC requests an area variance for 417 “A” Summit Avenue (tax parcel # 49.32-2-6.1) located in an R-2 Two-Family Residential District to allow for 33.2 feet of lot frontage where 40 feet is the minimum, pursuant to Section 264 Schedule C V. Adjourn

Get email alerts for Schenectady

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting