Muyni
← Back to Skaneateles

ZBA MEETING - JANUARY 28, 2026

Regular Meeting

Skaneateles, NY · January 28, 2026

AgendaPacketMinutesPacket

Minutes

Village of Skaneateles Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting January 28, 2026 Village Hall Public Hearing in the Area Variance Recommendation in the matter of the application of Jacob Bouley to vary the strict application of 225-A5 Density Control Schedule for Side Yard Setback, Left; Side Yard Setback Combined, Minimum Open Area; and Section 225-69D, Non- conforming Buildings, Structures and Uses, Extension or Expansion to enlarge the front porch, construct a rear two-story addition and rear patio at the property addressed as 42 Leitch Ave in the Village of Skaneateles. Present: Michael Stanczyk, Chairman Michael Balestra, Member Gregg LaPoint, Member Walter Nyzio, Member Michael O’Toole, Member Riccardo Galbato, Special Counsel John Cromp, Code Enforcement Officer Ian Carroll, Clerk to the Boards Bill Murphy, 4592 Jordan Rd, on behalf of Applicant Bonnie Dries, 12 Orchard Rd, Applicant Jake and Meghan Bouley, 42 Leitch Ave Bob Eggleston, 1391 E. Genesee St Jeanne StClaire, 38 & 40 Leitch Ave Chairman Stanczyk opened the public hearing for the Bouley matter at 7:43 pm. Bob Eggleston spoke on behalf of the Bouley family, who were also present. He stated there were two objectives to the design: 1) to enlarge the front porch and make it usable and more in keeping with the street, and 2) to add living space to the back of the house and improve the kitchen layout with a rear entrance. A new second-story primary bedroom will be added and a second bath. The existing structure is nonconforming regarding setbacks and open area requirements of the code, but the proposal will result in only a slight further decrease in open area. The Board said they liked the proposal, and it seemed like it would improve the property. On a question from the Board, Mr. Eggleston said he would connect to the storm sewer that exists on Leitch Ave, pending permission and guidance from Village municipal operations, which they had not yet sought. A neighbor was present and voiced her concerns regarding drainage potential effects on neighboring lots. She described wet conditions in backyards along Leitch Ave. Mr. Eggleston said that there are no gutters on the house currently, and with this project gutters will be added, including the front porch, that are intended to improve storm water conditions. On a motion from Chairman Stanczyk, seconded by Member Balestra, the requested variances were granted by unanimous approval. Conditions of approval are that work is done within the allotted 12-month period, and that the house and porch gutters will tie into storm system consistent with municipal operations requirements. Upon the unanimous vote of the members present, the motion was carried 5 – 0. The matter was concluded at 7:56 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ian Carroll, Clerk to the Boards

Agenda

Zoning Board of Appeals Regular Meeting Wednesday January 28, 2026 Village Hall 26 Fennell Street 7:00 PM Agenda 7:00 pm Public Hearing in the matter of the application of Bonnie Dries to appeal the determinations of the Code Enforcement Officer to modify an existing one car garage to construct a 21’8.4”-tall structure and stairs to a 617 S.F. second level above the parking area at the property addressed as 12 Orchard Rd in the village of Skaneateles. 7:05 pm Public Hearing in the matter of the Area Variance application of Jacob Bouley to vary the strict application of 225-A5 Density Control Schedule for Side Yard Setback, Left; Side Yard Setback Combined, Minimum Open Area; and Section 225-69D, Non-conforming Buildings, Structures and Uses, Extension or Expansion to enlarge the front porch, construct a rear two-story addition and rear patio at the property addressed as 42 Leitch Ave in the Village of Skaneateles. 7:10 pm Such other matters as may be before the Board. 7:15 pm Executive Session for Attorney – Client discussion Note: The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals is February 25, 2026, at 7:00 pm. * * * * * CRITERIA FOR VARIANCES Specific findings. No variance in the strict application of any provision of this chapter shall be granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals unless it shall find the evidence required under the following Subsection B(4) and (5). B(4) Use variances. (a) The Zoning Board of Appeals, on appeal from the decision or determination of the Code Enforcement Officer, shall have the power to grant use variances, authorizing a use of the land which otherwise would not be allowed or would be prohibited by the terms of this chapter. (b) No such use variance shall be granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals without a showing by the applicant and a finding by the Zoning Board of Appeals that applicable zoning regulations and restrictions have caused unnecessary hardship. In order to prove such unnecessary hardship the applicant shall demonstrate to the Zoning Board of Appeals that for each and every permitted use under this chapter for the particular district where the property is located: [1] The applicant cannot realize a reasonable return, provided that lack of return is substantial as demonstrated by competent financial evidence; [2] The alleged hardship relating to the property in question is unique and does not apply to a substantial portion of the district or neighborhood; [3] The requested use variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; and [4] The alleged hardship has not been self-created. (c) The Zoning Board of Appeals, in the granting of use variances, shall grant the minimum variance that it shall deem necessary and adequate to address the unnecessary hardship proved by the applicant and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. B(5) Area variances. (a) The Zoning Board of Appeals shall have the power, upon an appeal from a decision or determination of the Code Enforcement Officer, to grant area variances from the area or dimensional requirements of this chapter. (b) In making its determination, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall take into consideration the benefit to the applicant if the variance is granted, as weighed against the detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant. In making such determination the Board shall also consider and determine: [1] Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of the area variance; [2] Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance; [3] Whether the requested area variance is substantial; [4] Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district; and [5] Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration shall be relevant to the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals but shall not necessarily preclude the granting of the area variance. (c) The Zoning Board of Appeals, in the granting of area variances, shall grant the minimum variance that it shall deem necessary and adequate and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community.

Get email alerts for Skaneateles

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting