ZBA MEETING - JANUARY 28, 2026
Regular MeetingSkaneateles, NY · January 28, 2026
Minutes
Village of Skaneateles
Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting
January 28, 2026
Village Hall
Public Hearing in the Area Variance Recommendation in the matter of the application of Jacob
Bouley to vary the strict application of 225-A5 Density Control Schedule for Side Yard Setback,
Left; Side Yard Setback Combined, Minimum Open Area; and Section 225-69D, Non-
conforming Buildings, Structures and Uses, Extension or Expansion to enlarge the front porch,
construct a rear two-story addition and rear patio at the property addressed as 42 Leitch Ave in
the Village of Skaneateles.
Present: Michael Stanczyk, Chairman
Michael Balestra, Member
Gregg LaPoint, Member
Walter Nyzio, Member
Michael O’Toole, Member
Riccardo Galbato, Special Counsel
John Cromp, Code Enforcement Officer
Ian Carroll, Clerk to the Boards
Bill Murphy, 4592 Jordan Rd, on behalf of Applicant
Bonnie Dries, 12 Orchard Rd, Applicant
Jake and Meghan Bouley, 42 Leitch Ave
Bob Eggleston, 1391 E. Genesee St
Jeanne StClaire, 38 & 40 Leitch Ave
Chairman Stanczyk opened the public hearing for the Bouley matter at 7:43 pm.
Bob Eggleston spoke on behalf of the Bouley family, who were also present. He stated there
were two objectives to the design: 1) to enlarge the front porch and make it usable and more in
keeping with the street, and 2) to add living space to the back of the house and improve the
kitchen layout with a rear entrance. A new second-story primary bedroom will be added and a
second bath. The existing structure is nonconforming regarding setbacks and open area
requirements of the code, but the proposal will result in only a slight further decrease in open
area.
The Board said they liked the proposal, and it seemed like it would improve the property. On a
question from the Board, Mr. Eggleston said he would connect to the storm sewer that exists on
Leitch Ave, pending permission and guidance from Village municipal operations, which they had
not yet sought.
A neighbor was present and voiced her concerns regarding drainage potential effects on
neighboring lots. She described wet conditions in backyards along Leitch Ave. Mr. Eggleston
said that there are no gutters on the house currently, and with this project gutters will be added,
including the front porch, that are intended to improve storm water conditions.
On a motion from Chairman Stanczyk, seconded by Member Balestra, the requested
variances were granted by unanimous approval. Conditions of approval are that work is
done within the allotted 12-month period, and that the house and porch gutters will tie into
storm system consistent with municipal operations requirements. Upon the unanimous vote
of the members present, the motion was carried 5 – 0.
The matter was concluded at 7:56 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Ian Carroll, Clerk to the Boards
Agenda
Zoning Board of Appeals Regular Meeting
Wednesday January 28, 2026
Village Hall 26 Fennell Street 7:00 PM
Agenda
7:00 pm Public Hearing in the matter of the application of Bonnie Dries to appeal the
determinations of the Code Enforcement Officer to modify an existing one car garage to
construct a 21’8.4”-tall structure and stairs to a 617 S.F. second level above the parking area at
the property addressed as 12 Orchard Rd in the village of Skaneateles.
7:05 pm Public Hearing in the matter of the Area Variance application of Jacob Bouley to
vary the strict application of 225-A5 Density Control Schedule for Side Yard Setback, Left; Side
Yard Setback Combined, Minimum Open Area; and Section 225-69D, Non-conforming
Buildings, Structures and Uses, Extension or Expansion to enlarge the front porch, construct a
rear two-story addition and rear patio at the property addressed as 42 Leitch Ave in the Village of
Skaneateles.
7:10 pm Such other matters as may be before the Board.
7:15 pm Executive Session for Attorney – Client discussion
Note: The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals is February 25,
2026, at 7:00 pm.
* * * * *
CRITERIA FOR VARIANCES
Specific findings. No variance in the strict application of any provision of this chapter shall be granted by
the Zoning Board of Appeals unless it shall find the evidence required under the following
Subsection B(4) and (5).
B(4) Use variances.
(a) The Zoning Board of Appeals, on appeal from the decision or determination of the Code
Enforcement Officer, shall have the power to grant use variances, authorizing a use of the land which
otherwise would not be allowed or would be prohibited by the terms of this chapter.
(b) No such use variance shall be granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals without a showing by
the applicant and a finding by the Zoning Board of Appeals that applicable zoning regulations and
restrictions have caused unnecessary hardship. In order to prove such unnecessary hardship the applicant
shall demonstrate to the Zoning Board of Appeals that for each and every permitted use under this chapter
for the particular district where the property is located:
[1] The applicant cannot realize a reasonable return, provided that lack of return is
substantial as demonstrated by competent financial evidence;
[2] The alleged hardship relating to the property in question is unique and does not apply
to a substantial portion of the district or neighborhood;
[3] The requested use variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the
neighborhood; and
[4] The alleged hardship has not been self-created.
(c) The Zoning Board of Appeals, in the granting of use variances, shall grant the minimum
variance that it shall deem necessary and adequate to address the unnecessary hardship proved by the
applicant and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,
safety and welfare of the community.
B(5) Area variances.
(a) The Zoning Board of Appeals shall have the power, upon an appeal from a decision or
determination of the Code Enforcement Officer, to grant area variances from the area or dimensional
requirements of this chapter.
(b) In making its determination, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall take into consideration the
benefit to the applicant if the variance is granted, as weighed against the detriment to the health, safety
and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant. In making such determination the Board
shall also consider and determine:
[1] Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood
or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of the area variance;
[2] Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method,
feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance;
[3] Whether the requested area variance is substantial;
[4] Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical
or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district; and
[5] Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration shall be relevant
to the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals but shall not necessarily preclude the granting of
the area variance.
(c) The Zoning Board of Appeals, in the granting of area variances, shall grant the minimum
variance that it shall deem necessary and adequate and at the same time preserve and protect the character
of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Get email alerts for Skaneateles
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.