Board of Historic & Architectural Review

Name: Board of Historic & Architectural Review — Smithfield, VA
Start: 2020-05-19
End: 2020-05-19
Location: Smithfield, VA

Regular Meeting

Smithfield, VA · May 19, 2020

Agenda Minutes

Minutes

The Smithfield Board of Historic and Architectural Review held its regular meeting on Tuesday, May 19th, 2020 at 6:30 p.m. at the Smithfield Center. Members Present: Trey Gwaltney - Chairman Julia Hillegass – Vice Chair David Goodrich Gary Hess Russell Hill Justin Hornback Board Members absent: Ronny Prevatte Staff members present: John Settle – Community Development & Planning Director William H. Riddick, III – Town Attorney Michael Stallings – Town Manager There were approximately three (3) citizens present. The media was not represented. Chairman Gwaltney welcomed everyone to the meeting. Community Development & Planning Director’s Report: Mr. Settle reported that the Planner position has been filled. Tammie Clary began employment with the Town on February 24th, 2020. Additionally, Michael Stallings, the new Town Manager, started with the Town on April 20th, 2020. Upcoming Meetings and Activities: Tuesday, June 2nd – 6:30 PM – Town Council Meeting Tuesday, June 9th – 6:30 PM – Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, June 16th – 6:30 PM – BHAR Meeting Public Comments: There were no signups for public comments. Board Member Comments: There were no Board member comments. Assorted Exterior Changes (After-the-Fact) – 111 S. Church Street – Landmark – Christ Episcopal Church Trustees, c/o William Egan, applicant: In February, the applicants became aware that the structural integrity of the southern wall of the church had been compromised. Following a conversation with Town staff, the applicants were given permission to begin work to repair the wall to avoid further damage and risk. The applicants are proposing to utilize a concrete wall overlay system to restore the stability of the southern wall of the church. This concrete overlay will ultimately be sided in exterior gypsum sheathing. It will be painted a flat white color to match the stucco material present on the remainder of the church’s exterior. Town staff recommends approval of the application. The applicant, Bill Egan, lives at 205 Clipper Creek Lane in Smithfield. He explained that there were huge wall cracks which required a concrete wall overlay. All structural issues have been addressed. The wall still needs to be painted. The applicant explained that the building Board of Historic and Architectural Review May 19th, 2020 was constructed in 1832 with a brick façade. In 1852, the women of the church put some money together to stucco the exterior. The stucco was reapplied in 1892. In the 1940s and 1998, layers of stucco were added or repaired. He explained that the problem with stucco is that it traps moisture and conceals damage. Mr. Goodrich made a motion to approve the application as presented. Vice Chair Hillegass seconded the motion. Chairman Gwaltney called for the vote. On call for the vote, six members were present. Mr. Goodrich voted aye, Mr. Hess voted aye, Mr. Hill voted aye, Mr. Hornback voted aye, Vice Chair Hillegass voted aye, and Chairman Gwaltney voted aye. There were no votes against the motion. The motion passed. Amendment of Prior Approval – 129 Sykes Court – Non-Contributing – Kathy Peterson, applicant: Mr. Settle explained that at its Tuesday, September 17th, 2019 meeting, the BHAR approved the previous property owner’s application to make the following exterior changes to the existing single-family dwelling: (1) The replacement of the existing black-colored asphalt shingle roof with a slate-colored architectural asphalt shingle roof. (2) The replacement of the existing deteriorated white-colored horizontally lapped weatherboard siding and wooden trim with “Spanish Olive” colored “Dutch lap” style vinyl siding and “Silver Mist” colored vinyl trim. (3) The replacement of the existing deteriorated white-colored wooden eight (8) over eight (8) double-hung sash windows with white-colored vinyl six (6) over six (6) double-hung sash windows. (4) The installation of “Pebble Stone Clay” colored vinyl shutters of a raised panel style. (5) The replacement of the existing white-colored aluminum door with a Masonite steel door featuring raised panels and a fanlight. The new door is to be painted “Pebble Stone Clay” to match the shutters. (6) The addition of a gabled portico to cover the existing front porch, supported by round fiberglass columns to be painted “Silver Mist” to match the trim on the rest of the building. (7) The painting of the chimney “Spanish Olive” to match the siding. The property’s new owner wishes to amend this approval in the following manner: (a) The replacement of the existing deteriorated white-colored horizontally lapped weatherboard siding and wooden trim with white- colored horizontally lapped vinyl siding and white-colored vinyl trim. (b) The replacement of the existing deteriorated white-colored wooden eight (8) over eight (8) double-hung sash windows with white-colored vinyl eight (8) over eight (8) double-hung sash windows. (c) The installation of black-colored vinyl shutters of a raised panel style. 2 Board of Historic and Architectural Review May 19th, 2020 (d) The replacement of the existing white-colored aluminum front door with a wooden door featuring four (4) large lights above a single panel. The new door is to be painted white to match the proposed siding. (e) The addition of a shallow (two feet (2’) deep) gabled portico six feet (6’) in width with an arched ceiling above the principal doorway, supported by brackets. The proposed portico would be painted white to match the proposed siding, and would be roofed in slate-colored architectural asphalt shingles to match the rest of the roof. A pendant lantern will hang from the arched ceiling to light the doorway. (f) The repainting of the chimney in a like color (white). (g) The addition of gutters and downspouts. Town staff has already authorized the applicants to complete items one (1), “f”, and “g” above. Owing to the BHAR’s approval of the proposed replacement of the existing wooden windows with windows of a vinyl material at the September meeting, Town staff recommends approval as submitted. The applicant, Kathy Peterson, stated that she plans to reside at 111 Sykes Court once the items are completed. She explained that the portico is an addition to keep the rain and water off of the front porch area. She was available for questions. Vice Chair Hillegass made a motion to approve the application as presented. Mr. Hess seconded the motion. Chairman Gwaltney called for the vote. On call for the vote, six members were present. Mr. Goodrich voted aye, Mr. Hess voted aye, Mr. Hill voted nay, Mr. Hornback voted aye, Vice Chair Hillegass voted aye, and Chairman Gwaltney voted aye. There was one vote against the motion. The motion passed. Color Change – Lot 106, Main Street – Unclassified – Town of Smithfield, applicant: Mr. Settled explained that the benches along Hayden’s Lane currently feature artwork from local high school students which is now several years old. On most of the benches, paint has begun to chip and flake from the surfaces. The applicant proposes to remove the paint from the benches, returning them to their original appearances. They will be sealed but not painted. Mr. Goodrich made a motion to approve as presented. Vice Chair Hillegass seconded the motion. Chairman Gwaltney called for the vote. On call for the vote, six members were present. Mr. Goodrich voted aye, Mr. Hess voted aye, Mr. Hill voted aye, Mr. Hornback voted aye, Vice Chair Hillegass voted aye, and Chairman Gwaltney voted aye. There were no votes against the motion. The motion passed. HPO Designation Review – Forgotten Properties from 2017: Mr. Settle explained that the Planner, Tammie Clary, had reviewed all properties with no designation. There are several properties with new homes. There was one Landmark property that was overlooked. In 2017, the BHAR reviewed all properties and classifications. Due to technical difficulties, some properties were not reviewed. Chairman Gwaltney stated that he would like to vote on all properties at one time unless anyone objected or questioned the recommended designation of any particular property. 3

Agenda

Wednesday, May 13th, 2020 TO: BOARD OF HISTORIC & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (BHAR) FROM: JOHN SETTLE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING DIRECTOR RE: MONTHLY MEETING The BHAR will hold its regularly scheduled monthly meeting on Tuesday, May 19th, 2020 at 6:30 PM at the Smithfield Center, 220 N Church St, Smithfield, VA 23430. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact John Settle at 1-(757)-365-4200 or jsettle@smithfieldva.gov. cc: Town Council William H. Riddick, III, Town Attorney The Smithfield Times The Daily Press File COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING DEPARTMENT 310 Institute St, PO Box 246 / Smithfield, VA 23431 / 1-(757)-365-4200 / Fax 1-(757)-357-9933 www.smithfieldva.gov SMITHFIELD BOARD OF HISTORIC & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (BHAR) MEETING AGENDA: TUESDAY, MAY 19TH, 2020, 6:30 PM 1) Community Development & Planning Director’s Report: - Town staff has filled the newly-created planner position- Tammie Clary, the new planner, started on Monday, February 24th, 2020. - The new Town Manager, Michael Stallings, started with the Town on Monday, April 20th, 2020. We are all excited to be working with him! 2) Upcoming Meetings and Activities Tuesday, June 2nd – 6:30 PM – Town Council Meeting Tuesday, June 9th – 6:30 PM – Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, June 16th – 6:30 PM – BHAR Meeting 3) Public Comments 4) Board Member Comments 5) Assorted Exterior Changes (After-the-Fact) – 111 S Church St – Landmark – Christ Episcopal Church Trustees, C/O William Egan, applicant (staff report, BHAR application & illustration enclosed). 6) Color Change – Lot 106, Institute St – Unclassified – Town of Smithfield, applicant (staff report, BHAR application & illustration enclosed). 7) Amendment of Prior Approval – 129 Sykes Ct – Non-Contributing – Kathy Peterson, applicant (staff report, BHAR application & illustration enclosed). 8) HPO Designation Review – Forgotten Properties from 2017 9) Approval of the Tuesday, February 18th, 2020 meeting minutes (enclosed). ***ATTENTION*** Owing to the pandemic, we are encouraging remote public comment on all land use applications, whether or not a public hearing is required. If you do not feel comfortable with attending a meeting in person, please submit your comments in writing to Mr. John Settle, Community Development & Planning Director. Your comments will be conveyed to the appropriate Board or Commission. Mr. Settle can be reached via email (jsettle@smithfieldva.gov) or mail at the address below: Town of Smithfield Community Development & Planning Department ATTN John Settle, Director PO Box 246 Smithfield, VA 23431 NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMPLY WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) Reasonable efforts will be made to provide assistance or special arrangements to qualified individuals with disabilities in order to participate in or attend Board of Historic & Architectural Review (BHAR) meetings. ADA compliant hearing devices are available for use upon request. Please call 1-(757)-365-4200 at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the meeting date so that proper arrangements may be made. BOARD OF HISTORIC & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (BHAR) STAFF REPORT Tuesday, May 19th, 2020, 6:30 PM Applicant Christ Episcopal Church Trustees C/O William Egan 111 S Church St Smithfield, VA 23430 Owner Ibid. Property 111 S Church St TPINs 21A-01-349, 350, 390, 392 & 393 0.7 ac S Church St, b/t Main St & Cedar St Main St & S Church St, & S Church St & Cedar St Classification Landmark Zoning Downtown (D), Downtown Neighborhood Residential (DNR) & Historic Preservation Overlay (HPO) Adjacent Zoning Floodplain Overlay (FPO), D, DNR & HPO Project Description In February, the applicants became aware that the structural integrity of the southern wall of the church had been compromised. Following a conversation with Town staff, the applicants were given permission to begin work to repair the wall to avoid further damage and risk. The applicants are proposing to utilize a concrete wall overlay system to restore the stability of the southern wall of the church. This concrete overlay will ultimately be sided in exterior gypsum sheathing painted a flat white color to match the stucco material present on the remainder of the church’s exterior. Recommendation Town staff recommends approval as submitted. Please direct inquiries to John Settle at 1-(757)-365-4200 or jsettle@smithfieldva.gov. BOARD OF HISTORIC & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (BHAR) STAFF REPORT Tuesday, May 19th, 2020, 6:30 PM Applicant Town of Smithfield 310 Institute St Smithfield, VA 23430 Owner Ibid. Property Lot 106, Main St TPIN 21A-01-106 0.3711 ac NW side Main St 200’ NE Main St & Institute St Classification Unclassified Zoning Downtown (D), Downtown Neighborhood Residential (DNR) & Historic Preservation Overlay (HPO) Adjacent Zoning Ibid. Project Description The benches along Hayden’s Lane currently feature artwork from local high school students which is now several years old. On most of the benches, paint has begun to chip and flake from the surfaces. The applicant proposes to remove the paint from the benches, returning them to their original appearances. Recommendation Town staff recommends approval as submitted. Please direct inquiries to John Settle at 1-(757)-365-4200 or jsettle@smithfieldva.gov. BOARD OF HISTORIC & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (BHAR) STAFF REPORT Tuesday, May 19th, 2020, 6:30 PM Applicant Kathy Peterson 129 Sykes Ct Smithfield, VA 23430 Owner Ibid. Property 129 Sykes Ct TPIN 21A-01-376 3.47 ac b/t Sykes Ct, Jericho Rd & Little Creek 350’ NE Sykes Ct & S Mason St Classification Non-Contributing Zoning Chesapeake Bay Overlay (CBO), Downtown Neighborhood Residential (DNR), Environmental Conservation (EC), Floodplain Overlay (FPO) & Historic Preservation Overlay (HPO) Adjacent Zoning Community Conservation (CC), CBO, DNR, EC, FPO & HPO Project Description At its Tuesday, September 17th, 2019 meeting, the BHAR approved the previous property owner’s application to make the following exterior changes to the existing single-family dwelling: (1) The replacement of the existing black-colored asphalt shingle roof with a slate- colored architectural asphalt shingle roof. (2) The replacement of the existing deteriorated white-colored horizontally-lapped weatherboard siding and wooden trim with “Spanish Olive” colored “Dutch lap” style vinyl siding and “Silver Mist” colored vinyl trim. (3) The replacement of the existing deteriorated white-colored wooden eight (8) over eight (8) double-hung sash windows with white-colored vinyl six (6) over six (6) double-hung sash windows. (4) The installation of “Pebble Stone Clay” colored vinyl shutters of a raised panel style. (5) The replacement of the existing white-colored aluminum door with a Masonite steel door featuring raised panels and a fanlight. The new door is to be painted “Pebble Stone Clay” to match the shutters. (6) The addition of a gabled portico to cover the existing front porch, supported by round fiberglass columns to be painted “Silver Mist” to match the trim on the rest of the building. (7) The painting of the chimney “Spanish Olive” to match the siding. The property’s new owner wishes to amend this approval in the following manner: (a) The replacement of the existing deteriorated white-colored horizontally-lapped weatherboard siding and wooden trim with white-colored horizontally-lapped vinyl siding and white-colored vinyl trim. (b) The replacement of the existing deteriorated white-colored wooden eight (8) over eight (8) double-hung sash windows with white-colored vinyl eight (8) over eight (8) double-hung sash windows. (c) The installation of black-colored vinyl shutters of a raised panel style. (d) The replacement of the existing white-colored aluminum front door with a wooden door featuring four (4) large lights above a single panel. The new door is to be painted white to match the proposed siding. (e) The addition of a shallow (two feet (2’) deep) gabled portico six feet (6’) in width with an arched ceiling above the principal doorway, supported by brackets. The proposed portico would be painted white to match the proposed siding, and would be roofed in slate-colored architectural asphalt shingles to match the rest of the roof. A pendant lantern will hang from the arched ceiling to light the doorway. (f) The repainting of the chimney in a like color (white). (g) The addition of gutters and downspouts. Town staff have already authorized the applicants to complete items one (1), “f”, and “g” above. Recommendation Owing to the BHAR’s approval of the proposed replacement of the existing wooden windows with windows of a vinyl material at the September meeting, Town staff recommend approval as submitted. For inquiries, please contact John Settle at 1-(757)-365-4200 or jsettle@smithfieldva.gov. BOARD OF HISTORIC & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (BHAR) STAFF REPORT Tuesday, May 19th, 2020, 6:30 PM Applicant Town of Smithfield, 310 Institute St, Smithfield, VA 23430 Project HPO Designation Review: Forgotten Properties from 2017 Report In the early 1970s, a survey of historic properties in what was then solely the Smithfield National Historic District was conducted. The intent of this survey was to identify locally- significant properties in the district to assist Town staff in the development of Town’s own Historic Preservation Overlay (HPO). The HPO was adopted in 1979 and was eventually codified as Article 3.M of the Smithfield Zoning Ordinance (SZO). The first comprehensive review of the HPO occurred in 1990 and culminated in the adoption of the Smithfield Historic District Guidelines (SHDG). By 2000, Town staff had compiled previous surveys of the all of the HPO’s properties into a single list of addresses, historic names, and designations of significance. This list was eventually adopted as Section G of Article 3.M in September of that year. In 2004, this Section was revised, and by 2006, the SHDG was substantially modernized. Although the SHDG and the borders of the HPO remain both relevant and effective, the designations of significance in SZO Section 3.M.G must be reevaluated from time to time to consider alterations of the fabric of the HPO, changing attitudes towards more recent styles of architecture, and the buildings’ survival of the ravages of time. These designations are integral to the HPO, as they reflect the level of scrutiny applied to proposed exterior projects. The HPO identifies three formal designations, which are (in order of importance, “landmark”, “contributing”, and “non-contributing”. Traditionally, “unclassified” is an informal designation that has been reserved for buildings that have been constructed after the most recent evaluation of the HPO’s designations, new construction on a vacant lot lacking a designation, or in the instances in which properties were never provided with a designation. The SZO describes two of the three formal designations in the following Sections: SZO Section 3.M.D.2: All structures designated on [the HPO] map as structures from the eighteenth century to pre-Civil War, or structures with architectural significance from the period after the Civil War, shall be considered as landmarks or landmark structures. SZO Section 3.M.D.3: Properties designated as properties which contribute to the historic character of the Town, but which do not contain landmark structures, shall be known as contributing properties for the purpose of the ordinance. No description is provided in the SZO for non-contributing properties, but the BHAR has traditionally recognized non-contributing properties as those which feature buildings that were constructed less than fifty years ago, have been altered to such an extent that they are no longer representative of the period in which they were constructed, are in such a poor condition that their preservation is difficult, are unexemplary of any particular architectural style, and/or have no architectural merit. In 2017, previous Town staff undertook a comprehensive review of the designations of significance contained in SZO Section 3.M.G. However, given the shortage of Town staff at that time, this review was never completed. In mid-2019 this was realized, and since the start of this year, Town staff have endeavored to finish this process. This has led to the discovery that a series of properties were missed, or have been newly-constructed since 2017. These properties have been identified, photographed, and supplemented with Town staff’s recommended designations of significance in the following pages. Finally, there are currently 221 properties that do not feature any known improvements and are therefore “unclassified”. Town staff consequently recommends that these vacant properties be formally designated as “non-contributing” as any new construction located thereon would be unlikely to exceed a designation above “non-contributing” by the next evaluation cycle. Town staff is seeking the BHAR’s comments and recommendations on the designations of the properties in the attached pages before proceeding further with this evaluation cycle. Please direct inquiries to John Settle at 1-(757)-365-4200 or jsettle@smithfieldva.gov. Forgotten Properties from 2017 Town of Smithfield Historic District TPIN: 21A-01-242  Current Designation: Non-Contributing  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN:21A-01-246  Current Designation: Non-Contributing  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN: 21A-48-001  Current Designation: No Designation  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN:21A-01-244  Current Designation: No Designation  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN: 21A-48-002  Current Designation: No Designation  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN: 21A-48-003  Current Designation: No Designation  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN:21A-01-238  Current Designation: Non-Contributing  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN:21A-01-248  Current Designation: Non-Contributing  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN:21A-01-247  Current Designation: Contributing  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN:21A-01-240  Current Designation: Contributing  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN:21A-01-245  Current Designation: No Designation  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN:21A-01-399A  Current Designation: No Designation  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN:21A-01-401  Current Designation: No Designation  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN:21A-01-343  Current Designation: Landmark  Recommended Designation: Landmark TPIN:21A-01-337  Current Designation: Contributing  Recommended Designation: Contributing TPIN:21A-01-286  Current Designation: No Designation  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN:21A-01-170B  Current Designation: Non-Contributing  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN:21A-01-170  Current Designation: Non-Contributing  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN:21A-03-A003A  Current Designation: No Designation  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN:21A-03-E011  Current Designation: No Designation  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN:21A-03-H017  Current Designation: Pre-existing structure Contributing  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing TPIN:21A-01-444  Current Designation: Contributing  Recommended Designation: Contributing TPIN:21A-03-C014 TPIN: 21A-03-D009  Current Designation: Vacant Lots with New Construction  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing 21A-01-038 21A-01-173 21A-01-301 21A-01-392 21A-03-B018 21A-03-D005 21A-03-F001 21A-01-039 21A-01-178 21A-01-393 21A-03-D012 21A-03-F002 21A-01-308 21A-01-399 21A-03-B018A 21A-03-D013 21A-03-G003 21A-01-040 21A-01-181 21A-01-182 21A-01-309 21A-01-399B 21A-03-B019 21A-03-D015 21A-03-G005 21A-01-041 21A-01-400 21A-03-B024 21A-03-D017 21A-01-182A 21A-01-311 21A-01-402A 21A-03-G008 21A-01-042 21A-03-D019 21A-03-H008 21A-01-183 21A-01-315 21A-01-404 21A-03-B025 21A-03-D021 21A-01-043 21A-01-186A 21A-01-407 21A-03-B026 21A-03-H011 21A-01-316 21A-03-D022 21A-03-H014 21A-01-044 21A-01-192 21A-01-407A 21A-03-D023 21A-01-317 21A-01-420 21A-03-B027 21A-03-H018 21A-01-045 21A-01-202 21A-03-D024 21A-01-318 21A-01-421 21A-03-B028 21A-03-D025 21A-03-H019 21A-01-046A 21A-01-223A 21A-01-451 21A-03-H020 21A-01-319 21A-03-B029 21A-03-D026 21A-01-050 21A-01-224A 21A-01-452 21A-03-H021 21A-01-459 21A-03-B030 21A-03-D027 21A-01-050A 21A-01-224A 21A-01-323 21A-03-D028 21A-03-H024 21A-03-A001 21A-01-228 21A-01-346 21A-03-B032 21A-03-D029 21A-03-H025 21A-01-050B 21A-03-A002 21A-01-228 21A-03-A003B 21A-03-B033 21A-03-D030 21A-03-H026 21A-01-051 21A-01-347 21A-03-H027 21A-01-238A 21A-03-A004A 21A-03-B034 21A-03-D031 21A-01-057A 21A-01-348 21A-03-A005 21A-03-D032 21A-03-H028 21A-01-241 21A-03-B035 21A-01-058 21A-01-246 21A-01-349 21A-03-A005A 21A-03-D033 21A-04-000I11 21A-01-061 21A-03-A008 21A-03-B038 21A-03-D034 21A-04-000I14 21A-01-252 21A-01-350 21A-03-A008A 21A-03-D035 21A-01-067A2 21A-01-254 21A-03-B041 21A-04-000I6 21A-01-352 21A-03-B001 21A-03-D036 21A-04-002 21A-01-067C 21A-01-255 21A-03-B003 21A-03-B042 21A-03-D037 21A-01-353 21A-03-B004 21A-04-004 21A-01-068 21A-01-263 21A-03-B043 21A-03-D038 21A-04-010A 21A-01-354A 21A-03-B005 21A-03-D039 21A-01-069 21A-01-263A 21A-03-B007 21A-03-B044 21A-04-012 21A-01-275 21A-01-355 21A-03-D040 21A-04-037 21A-01-074 21A-03-B008A 21A-03-B044A 21A-03-D041 21A-01-106 21A-01-276 21A-01-356A 21A-03-B009 21A-03-B044B 21A-04-038 21A-03-D042 21A-03-B009A 21A-04-039 21A-01-113 21A-01-277 21A-01-359 21A-03-B044B 21A-03-D043 21A-03-B010 21A-04-040 21A-01-284 21A-01-360 21A-03-D044 21A-01-117A 21A-03-B011 21A-03-C005 21A-04-049 21A-01-285 21A-03-E001 21A-01-128 21A-01-361 21A-03-B012 21A-03-C017 21A-03-E001A 21A-04-050 21A-01-293 21A-03-B013 21A-01-129 21A-01-296 21A-01-364A 21A-03-B014 21A-03-C018 21A-03-E001B 21A-04-051 21A-03-E002 21A-04-052 21A-01-133 21A-01-296 21A-01-375 21A-03-B015 21A-03-C021 21A-03-B017 21A-03-E006 21A-04-053 21A-01-170A 21A-01-300 21A-01-380 21A-03-B017B 21A-03-D004A 21A-03-E011A 21A-04-054  Recommended Designation: Non-Contributing

Get email alerts for Smithfield

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting