City Council
Regular MeetingSouth Burlington, VT · January 6, 2025
Minutes
ur
southburlington
YERMONT
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL
6 JANUARY 2025
The South Burlington City Council held a regular meeting on Monday, 6 January
2025, at 6: 30 p. m.,
in the Auditorium, 180 Market Street, and by Go to Meeting
remote participation.
MEMBERS PRESENT: T. Barritt, Chair; A. Chalnick, E. Fitzgerald, M. Scanlan, L.
Smith
ALSO PRESENT: J. Baker, City Manager; Chief S. Locke, Deputy City Manager; C.
McNeil, City Attorney; M. Machar, Finance Director; T. DiPietro, Director of Public
Works; E. Quallen, DPW Capital Projects; L. Demaroney, B. Layman, B. Sirvis, D.
Leban, B. Britt, L. Marriott, N. Warner, T. Bellevance, G. Selik, T. Martin, M.
Pasanan, L. Bailey, John' s Pad, S. Grasso, J. Hyslop
1. Pledge of Allegiance:
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
2. Instructions on exiting building in case of emergency and review of
technology option:
Ms. Baker provided instructions on emergency exit from the building and
reviewed technology options.
3. Additions, deletions or changes in the order of Agenda items:
Agenda item # 16 was removed from the Agenda.
4. Comments and questions from the public not related to the agenda:
PAGE 1
Ms. Demaroney expressed concern with the proposed extended shared use path
on Dorset Street. It will have a great impact on their property, and they don' t
believe there is a need for the path. She said they were not part of the discussion
about the path, and they have issues of safety because of the left turn lane. The
path will use 10 feet of the remaining 12- 13 feet of buffer from Dorset St. Other
paths now exist. Ms. Demaroney said they would prefer a route on the other side
of the street. She said a lot has changed since the path was proposed and she
said a new study is needed.
Mr. Layman agreed with Ms. Demaroney. He said there are people crossing
Dorset Street where there is no crosswalk. He also cited the speed of traffic in the
area.
He felt the money could be better spent for a path elsewhere in the city
where there is no existing path.
5. Announcements, councilors reports from committee assignments
and City Manager' s Report:
Council members presented their " start of the year" thoughts and reported on
meetings and events they had attended in recent weeks.
Ms. Baker: Reported on a
meeting with State Legislature delegates. She noted
there are two kinds of advocacy: staff advocacy ( professional expertise of the
Department Heads) and political advocacy ( the policy positions of the Council and
community — as led by the Council.)
The new City website will be up and running on 16 January.
6. Consent Agenda:
a. Approve and Sign Disbursements
b. Accept the following easements for the construction and future
maintenance of the Dorset Street Shared Use Path between Old
Cross Road and Sadie Lane and associated drainage and utility
infrastructure. A combination of permanent and temporary
easements on parcel 0750- 01480 granted to the City by Warranty
Deed signed 17 April 2024
c. Receive the October and November 2024 financials
CITY COUNCIL 6 JANUARY 2025 PAGE 2
Mr. Smith said he still supports the Shared Use Path though there is still work to
be done so abutters can address some of their issues and the path can be
improved.
Mr. Chalnick moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Mr. Smith
seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
7. Receive an FY26 budget request from the Safe Routes to School
Task Force:
Ms. Grasso of Local Motion said the aim of the Task Force is to make it safe for
Children to walk and bike to all schools. She reviewed the membership and tasks
of the Task Force as follows:
a. Safe walk/ bike routes to all 5 schools
b. Support Safe Routes to School teams in the schools
c. Determine whether the initiative should continue into the future
Ms. Grasso reviewed participation in the local concerns meeting regarding Dorset
Street paving and safety improvement project. The Task Force also did a
walk/ bike audit and streetlight analysis. They were able to test a Safe Routes to
School path from Elsom Parkway through neighborhood streets to the Middle and
High Schools ( she showed photos of the route, signage, neckdowns, temporary
crosswalk, and bike/ ped stencils).
A community survey was done which received 51 responses, 75% of which were
in favor of making this route permanent. There were concerns with the bumpouts
because they move cyclists to the middle of the street.
Ms. Grasso said the biggest project is to identify and map areas of concern within
a mile of each school. She explained the process. She then showed the GIS
mapping with attention drawn to areas of concern.
Focusing on Chamberlin School, there were various get- togethers at which 30
issues of concern were raised. The Task Force will do the same analysis with the
other schools. There is a study underway of the Market St./ Datillio Drive
intersection.
Other areas of concern include filling the need for crossing guards and circulation
issues in the Middle and High School parking lot.
CITY COUNCIL 6 JANUARY 2025 PAGE 3
The hope is to build Safe Routes to School teams in all of the City' s schools.
The Task Force is asking for $ 285, 000 in FY25 for additional streetlights and for
400, 000 in FY26 to complete the Richard Terrace sidewalk gap and $ 70, 000 for
the White Street Improvement Plan which addresses 12 areas of concern. The
hope is to use ARPA money for some of these costs. Ms. Grasso said she
understood the money for the lighting is in the DPW budget.
Mr. DiPietro said DPW has moved forward with engineering of Dorset Street
including lighting. It currently meets minimum requirements. They have received
a good bid for this work.
Ms. Fitzgerald asked if the lighting goes in this area, won' t there be a request to
continue it all the way down Dorset Street. Mr. DiPietro acknowledged that the
sidewalks will be brighter with the new lights. As to whether the lights would
continue, he said that would be a policy decision.
Mr. DiPietro cited the need to look at needs city- wide, including sidewalk
maintenance. He noted that Richard Terrace is not in the existing plan. Ms.
Quallen said that the Council will see more smaller requests at its next meeting.
Ms. Baker said these are things the Council asked staff to look at because of public
concern. She encouraged the Council to think about how multiple efforts ( SRTS,
the Bike Ped Committee, the TIF projects, and the Active Transportation Plan) all
fit together. She also noted the assistance of CCRPC in paying for some of this
work.
Ms. Leban questioned the Dorset Street lighting and said if you add to one section
of Dorset Street, it will look darker
on the other sections.
She suggested adding to
the existing poles instead of installing new poles. She added that the reason the
sidewalks are dark is the existence of trees. She offered to look at the plans and
suggested the focus be on lighting the sidewalks. This might save some money.
Mr. DiPietro said the consultant told them they can' t " piggy- back" the lighting
which was a disappointment. They have had the City Arborist look at tree pruning
and limited work was done. ( Mr. DiPietro noted the City Arborist has just retired
and the search is on for a replacement)
Ms. Grasso said there will probably be priority projects for the other schools as
time goes on.
CITY COUNCIL 6 JANUARY 2025 PAGE 4
8. Receive the annual Winooski Valley Park District presentation:
Mr. Warner reviewed the history and noted the District focuses on acquisition,
management and conservation of properties. They manage 111 acres in South
Burlington. They also do a lot of education including a pre- school. Much of their
work is done by volunteers ( he showed photos taken in the various parks) though
they have a full- time Parks Superintendent and seasonal crews.
Mr. Warner said they have diversified their income by acting as a fiscal agent for
non- profits. They also have a number of " partners" including the Abnaki who rent
from them, Ethan Allen Homestead, Burlington Wildways, New Farms for New
Americans, and several community gardens. He showed a list of the various
parks and their acreages and a slide of each park. Most parks are actively used.
They are currently working on a new park in Williston.
Mr. Warner explained the budget process and showed the " fair share" analysis.
Ms. Baker said the South Burlington fee is already built into the operating budget.
9. Continue the City Council' s discussion of the proposed FY26 budget
and provide direction to staff:
Ms. Baker drew attention to her memo and said that no action is needed at this
meeting. The budget is at a 3. 33% increase now with the use of ARPA funds.
Members indicated they were comfortable with that.
Mr. Britt said he supports the lighting request and the Richard Terrace work. It
could " kick- start" the Safe Routes to School initiative. He felt that to wait 2 years
to begin that would be wrong.
NOTE: Agenda items were addressed out of order at this point but will be
recorded in the Agenda order.
10. Discuss a potential ballot item for Town Meeting Day that amends
the Penny for Paths program:
Mr. McNeil said that at the Council' s request, he looked into a ballot item to
amend the use of Penny for Paths funds to allow for maintenance. The Council
would have to approve the language to be on the Warning and have an
CITY COUNCIL 6 JANUARY 2025 PAGE 5
informational meeting prior to the vote. The item would also have to be
published and posted.
Mr. Chalnick recommended amending the wording to add " up to 20% of future tax
proceeds." He felt this would give more flexibility.
Mr. Smith said he agrees in theory, but he is concerned that Penny for Paths funds
have already been allocated through FY27 to existing projects. He didn' t want to
take away from that.
Ms. Quallen said the way things are set up now, the City would collect funds till
2029, and there would be a balance after the City stops collecting. Ms. Baker
noted that as the Grand List goes up, the Penny for Paths goes up.
Mr. Smith said the voters approved the money to improve the path network. If
the money is used for maintenance, it takes away from what the voters wanted.
Mr. Chalnick said that is why there would be a vote to see if the voters will accept
the change.
Mr. Scanlan agreed with Mr. Smith and said it is premature to put it on the ballot
until there is a Transportation Plan, a Safe Routes to School plan, etc.
Mr. Barritt said any asset will always have maintenance costs, and this should
have been part of the original motion. What is proposed is a " tweak" to repair
what exists and needs to be fixed.
Mr. Smith noted the budget includes funds for maintenance. He felt it made more
sense to wait. Ms. Fitzgerald noted it is only 3 weeks before ballots are mailed
out. She thought there could be better options.
Mr. Britt said it took months to educate the community for the original vote. He
felt this proposal is " misguided." He reviewed the history of Penny for Paths. It
was for infrastructure, never for maintenance. All the funds are already allocated
to projects. He wanted the funds to be " sacred to new paths."
A straw vote of the Council was held, and the proposed item did not pass.
11. Hold a First Reading of and Ethics Investigation and Enforcement
Ordinance in response to the State' s new Municipal Ethics Statute.
Potentially set a Second Reading and Public Hearing for 3 February
CITY COUNCIL 6 JANUARY 2025 PAGE 6
2025 at 7: 00 p. m. and consider appointing a Liaison to the State
Ethics Commission and a Designated and Alternate Complaint
Recipient:
Mr. McNeil drew attention to the draft Ordinance which went into effect on 1/ 1/ 25.
The City now has to:
1. Create a mechanism by which to accept/ investigate/ enforce
complaints. The only way to do this is to adopt an Ordinance.
The proposed Ordinance was written with the help of VLCT.
2. Choose a liaison to the State Ethics Commission and pick a
designated complaint recipient. The City has also added an
alternate complaint recipient in the event the designated person is
not available.
The City Attorney would be the designated complaint recipient with the Deputy
City Manager as alternate.
Mr. McNeil noted that as part of the new code, the Council must receive training
which will be provided by the State. Training will be interactive, and the City must
keep a record of who has/ hasn' t received the training. This must be done by
September 2025.
Mr. Chalnick moved that to approve the First Reading of an Ethics Investigation
and Enforcement Ordinance in response to the State' s Municipal Ethics Statute
and set a public hearing for 3 February 2025 at 7: 00 p. m. Mr. Scanlan seconded.
Motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Chalnick moved to appoint Colin McNeil as Designated Complaint Recipient
and Liaison to the State Ethics Commission. Mr. Scanlan seconded. Motion
passed unanimously.
Mr. Chalnick then moved to appoint Steven Lock as Alternate Complaint
Recipient. Mr. Scanlan seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
12. Receive an Update from the North East Agricultural Trust ( NEAT)
and the South Burlington Land Trust (SBLT) on a joint project at
1720 and 1730 Spear Street currently called the " Long View Project."
CITY COUNCIL 6 JANUARY 2025 PAGE 7
This follows the Vermont Housing and Conservation Board' s
approval of funding and an Associate Resolution. Provide direction
to staff:
Mr. Chalnick explained that the City has been mandated to adopt a new conflict of
interest policy, and although he believed he could act impartially in this matter,
under the new policy he is, as an abutter, required to recuse himself. He then
stepped down from the Council during this item.
Ms. Baker advised that the project was heard by the VHCB Board on 12/ 13. The
grant agreement and resolution was provided as part of the packet. The revised
VHCB resolution includes conserving 36. 4 acres with a transition zone to allow for
other community uses and possibly affordable housing. It requires a minimum of
16 affordable homes. Ms. Baker reminded all that this is an unusual development
process and that there are many steps to come before final agreements are
reached and funding allocated. Ms. Baker went on to say that VHCB has been a
critical partner in achieving the City' s goals for many decades. Funding from
VHCB has made the following projects possible: the Summit homes at O' Brien
Hillside, Garden Street, Auclair, and Dorset Commons.
Mr. Seelig of the VHCB Board said that they had revised their Resolution. He
stressed that this is a very complex process with many steps. He urged trust in
the process as there is a lot still to be defined and many experts are working to do
that. He added that VHCB has been a critical partner with South Burlington for
many years and the hope is to continue that partnership in the future.
Mr. Seelig of VHCB reviewed their function. He said they had more public
comment on this project than all of their other projects, each commenter asking
for something different. The Resolution VHCB passed supports conservation and
provides a place for Habitat for Humanity to developl6 units of affordable
housing. What is controversial involves 6 acres, a portion of which may or may
not be needed to accommodate those 16 units.
It will be up to the City to decide
on the recreational uses of those 6 acres. They would have to come back to VHCB
for any additional units of development. Mr. Seelig said VHCB is willing to work
with the City on a process for a final plan. He noted that Habitat brings in
hundreds of volunteers to keep costs down, and he cited the Habitat project as a
gain for the community.
CITY COUNCIL 6 JANUARY 2025 PAGE 8
Mr. Martin of VHCB said they hope to find some resolution at this meeting. He
said there are a lot of potential uses for the 6 acres that are in contention. Part of
that area is wetland. The area will have to be mapped.
Mr. Barritt asked if VHCB is confident that a conservation easement could be
written that would allow the flexibility they speak of. Mr. Seelig said they are not
trying to determine that process.
Mr. Smith said he was thrilled with VHCB' s commitment to the project. It will
bring 16 units of affordable housing to the " high rent district," and nothing else
could bring this affordability to the Southeast Quadrant ( SEQ). He stressed that
this is privately owned property, and the City has to work with the owner and hear
from them as to what is and is not acceptable to them.
Mr. Barritt said he was not certain that Open Space Fund money can be used to
purchase the 6 acres if there is a potential for additional development.
Mr. McNeil said he has reviewed what was approved by the voters, and it is for
purchase of land for open space and recreation purposes. It would be " a
challenge" to use that money where development is proposed. Mr. Seelig asked
if all 36 acres are conserved but a portion is left " flexible," could the Open Space
Fund money be used. Mr. McNeil said if the use is changed, the City would have
to reimburse the Open Space Fund.
Mr. Seelig said section " 1 C" of their Resolution says the City would have to come
back to VHCB if further development was desired. He said VHCB didn' t want to tie
the City' s hands into the future. He stressed that they don' t want to force
anyone' s hand as there are still " unknowns" ( e. g., wetlands).
Mr. Scanlan said he voted " no" on the project. There is a large chunk of money
being asked for from the city, and he felt that housing should be maximized. If
more housing was in " 1C" it could change his vote. He also questioned using
money again in the SEQ. To date the Open Fund has been used only to acquire
land in the SEQ. Also, no land for active recreation had been acquired despite it
being one of the Fund' s two objectives. He also noted, if the Funds would be used
now there would be no funding for the recommendations due at the end of year
from the Master Plan to ensure equity of open space and recreational parks
throughout the City, let alone funding for the City Green. He would like to keep
section " 1 C."
CITY COUNCIL 6 JANUARY 2025 PAGE 9
Ms. Fitzgerald cited the need to maintain flexibility and consider the needs of
future generations.
Mr. Bellavance then reviewed the history of the project. It began as a
conservation process. They were then told to find housing partners. He stressed
that they are committed to those 16 Habitat homes. He noted that appraisal of the
land actually came in higher than what they are
selling the land to Habitat for. Mr.
Bellavance stressed that his goal is to provide those 16 units of affordable house
and to preserve the open space including the 6 acres for open space and
recreation.
While they will allow use of a small portion of those 6 acres if
additional space is needed for the 16 Habitat homes, they will not agree to any
additional housing beyond those 16 homes.
Mr. Smith said 16 homes are better than none. He added that with the new
administration in Washington, " what we think is protected may not be." He asked
if the landowner' s statement is a hard stop for VHCB.
Mr. Seelig said it is not their role to dictate to the City. He added that he and Mr.
Bellavance have worked together for many years. The 16 Habitat homes are very
important. He will talk to his Board to see if eliminating potential future
development on the 6 acres is a stopper for them. He said VHCB wants the City to
be in the driver' s seat.
Mr. Smith asked if the Council can agree that the only housing on the 6 acres
would be to get to the 16 Habitat homes and that the rest of the acreage would be
for recreation, gardens, etc. This is what the owner wants in exchange for 16
permanently affordable homes and conservation of the remaining land.
Mr. Barritt said it makes sense to him.
Ms. Fitzgerald said she likes every aspect of this project including some flexibility.
She was OK with staff looking at what was heard tonight to see if there is more
flexibility.
Mr. Bellavance said they have been overly flexible. Delays are costing them
9, 000- 10, 000 a month. The time to act is now. If the additional housing is
eliminated, it' s a go.
Mr. Seelig said it will likely be a go with his Board which will meet on 24 January.
CITY COUNCIL 6 JANUARY 2025 PAGE 10
Ms. Baker said this is a difficult position to put elected officials in. Chief Locke
added that he didn' t think they were that far apart. Mr. Bellavance stated he
agreed to the 16 homes, and they are holding to that agreement. Mr. Scanlan said
we will get there."
Mr. Chalnick rejoined the Council.
13. Review the significant agenda topics below for the Council regular
meeting on 13 January 2025:
a.
FY26 Budget Public Hearing
b. FY26 Budget - Approve Budget to send to the voters and approve
associated Resolutions
c. Receive the Pension Asset Update and Actuarial Report
d. Receive the Audit Report from RHR Smith
e. Receive a briefing on the City' s response to Act 180 ( pre-chargh
Community Justice Center services)
f. Consider and approve the annual review process for the City
Manager
g. Consider amending the allocation process to award FY25 Social
Services funding
Ms. Baker said the Audit will not happen on that night.
Mr. Smith noted the recent cold snap and its effect on the City' s unhoused
population. He noted that 10% of commercial buildings are unoccupied and
questioned whether
anything can be done. Ms. Baker said a lot is happening at
the State level - where the responsibility of safety net housing rests. The
challenge isn' t the physical space. It is the operators or
staffing. If there is a
provider who would like to open in South Burlington, the City would happily be a
partner. Ms. Fitzgerald expressed willingness to talk with the Council and with
Rep. Krasnow about this.
14. Convene as Liquor Control Commission to consider the following
applications for approval: Roots Future, LLC, Third Class
Restaurant/ Bar License:
Mr. Smith moved to convene as Liquor Control Commission. Mr. Scanlan
seconded. Motion passed unanimously
CITY COUNCIL 6 JANUARY 2025 PAGE 11
Mr. Smith moved to approve the Third Class Restaurant/ Bar License for Roots
Future, LLC, as presented. Mr. Scanlan seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Smith moved to reconvene as City Council. Mr. Scanlan seconded. Motion
passed unanimously.
As there was no further business to come before the Council Mr. Smith moved
to adjourn. Mr. Scanlan seconded. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting
was adjourned at 10: 22 p. m.
Clerk
CITY COUNCIL 6 JANUARY 2025 PAGE 12
Get email alerts for South Burlington
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.