City Council Meeting - ARCHIVED
Regular MeetingSouth Jordan, UT · March 21, 2023
Minutes
SOUTH JORDAN CITY
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 21, 2023
Present: Mayor Dawn Ramsey, Council Member Patrick Harris, Council Member Brad
Marlor, Council Member Don Shelton, Council Member Tamara Zander, Council
Member Jason McGuire, City Manager Gary Whatcott, Deputy City Manager
Dustin Lewis, CFO Sunil Naidu, Director of Strategy & Budget Don Tingey,
Director of Commerce Brian Preece, Associate Director of Public Works Joey
Collins, Director of Administrative Services Melinda Seager, City Attorney Ryan
Loose, City Recorder Anna Crookston, GIS Coordinator Matt Jarman, Senior IS
Tech Phill Brown, IT Director Jon Day, Director of Planning Steven
Schaefermeyer, City Engineer Brad Klavano, Fire Chief Chris Dawson, Police
Chief Jeff Carr, Director of Recreation Janell Payne, Meeting Transcriptionist
Diana Baun, Communications Manager Rachael Van Cleave, Planning
Commissioner Laurel Bevans, Strategy & Budget Analyst Abagail Patonai,
Planning Commissioner Laurel Bevans
Absent:
Others: Grant Howarth, Bob Paxton, Sandy Bennion, Jay Francis, Mary Heine, Rachel
Aubrey, Kristy Jack, Owner’s iPad (2), Hilary Robertson, Cathy Richards, Adam
Kolowich, Steve Richards, Becky Zimmerman, Bryan Farnsworth, Mike
Hathorne – LHM Communities, Colton Norman, Reed Beatse, Emilly Fitton,
MNS, Lynda Nelson, Nelson, Brian Wilkinson, LJ, Jake Warner, Carol Brown,
Wayne Bradshaw, Shannon Ellsworth, Carl Barton, Josh Brown, Sam Bishop,
Carol Sancho
6:40 P.M.
REGULAR MEETING
A. Welcome, Roll Call, and Introduction to Electronic Meeting - By Mayor Dawn
Ramsey
Mayor Ramsey welcomed everyone and introduced the meeting.
B. Invocation – By Director of City Commerce Brian Preece
Director Preece offered the invocation.
C. Pledge of Allegiance – By Director of Strategy and Budget Don Tingey
Director Tingey led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
D. Minute Approval
South Jordan City 2
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
D.1. March 7, 2023 City Council Study Meeting Minutes
D.2. March 7, 2023 City Council Meeting Minutes
Council Member Shelton motioned to approve the March 7, 2023 City Council Study
Meeting Minutes and the March 7, 2023 City Council Meeting Minutes as published.
Council Member Harris seconded the motion; vote was unanimous in favor.
E. Mayor and Council Reports
Council Member Jason McGuire attended the Arts Council Art Show last night, with Mayor
Ramsey and Council Member Marlor in attendance as well; the art was fantastic. Today he met
with the Art’s Council and participated in the Master Plan for the Arts being worked on.
Council Member Tamara Zander attended the SoJo Race Series Event for St. Patrick’s Day last
Saturday. She invited everyone to attend these races, as they not only allow for true athletes to
compete, but it also has categories for all levels, including ruckers. It is a great opportunity for
people in the city to get together and move, exercise, laugh and have fun together. Council
Members Marlor and Harris were there, along with our Deputy City Manager Dustin Lewis, GIS
Coordinator Matt Jarman, Communications Specialist Joshua Timothy, and others. Next Month’s
race is on April 22, celebrating Earth Day. Yesterday she spoke at the Rotary Club Student
Teacher Awards, where local principals choose a Junior or Senior from their school with
outstanding service for the award. Tomorrow, the South Valley Chamber’s South Jordan
Business Committee has organized their 1st annual Veteran’s Event, and all veterans in the city
are invited. There will be a comedian and dinner, and she is hoping for it to be an annual event.
Council Member Brad Marlor had an Architectural Review Committee meeting last week for the
reception center on 10600 S 3600 W, and it will be presented at a planning commission meeting
in the next few weeks. He attended the SoJo Race Series and participated in the Rucking Race,
where you carry a backpack with weight in it through the race. He attended the South Jordan Art
Show, where his wife has 2 pieces of art on display, and he really enjoyed the experience. He
noted that our Planning Commission Chair’s children also have some pieces of art in the show.
Earlier today he met with some prominent businessmen about expansion and many opportunities
for future jobs, which is very exciting for the city. He had the opportunity to be involved with a
choir performance at the Kerrington Court Assisted Living Center and he loved it, the residents
loved the music and performance as well. He expressed his appreciation for the new playground
equipment at the Jordan Ridge Park going in right now, and there are many, many neighbors that
are very excited to see that finished.
Council Member Patrick Harris also attended the SoJo Race Series with his family, he always
loves those events. He brought his dog and loves to see how many others are bringing their dogs
to the race to participate with them. The staff does an excellent job on those races. He attended
the Republican Convention as a delegate, it was a long day but he always enjoys attending.
Council Member Don Shelton attended the Jordan River Executive Committee Meeting to
finalize the Jordan River Commission’s business plan for the fiscal year. Last night he had
South Jordan City 3
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
another Western Growth Coalition meeting, where they discussed the future of the WGC and in
many ways he believes that group has run its course. They agreed on a format with a meeting
right before the legislative session where they invite legislators to speak, along with a few
meetings throughout the session. He has decided to stay involved until after the next meeting, at
which time the plan is to choose a new president.
Mayor Dawn Ramsey attended the State Unified Basketball Championship. There were a few
meetings with Jordan Valley Water and trustees, things are going well. Everyone worries about
water, but she reassured everyone that the water district has a 50 year plan, that is not just
conservation based, with expert planning involved. She attended an Envision Utah Board
meeting and discussed the other legislative roundups she has attended, including a roundup by
the South Valley Chamber with Speaker Wilson and Senator Fillmore. She had breakfast with
Mayor Wilson and Mayor Silvestrini to discuss regional issues affecting the county, and to
collaborate. She met with the representatives from the Fulmer Legacy Boxing Project, and they
had some great updates. They have done an amazing job with fundraising, and brought in some
very impressive renderings for the project. They still need additional funding to finish, but they
are very close to getting started. She filmed a segment for KSL Studio 5 called “Your Beautiful
Community,” about our beautiful community, after they reached out to her. She also had an
interview with the Deseret News, who is writing a collaborative article about good city planning,
and they asked for the interview with her because of the city’s examples good planning. It is nice
to have the media recognizing the city’s good works. She recorded a podcast with Jordan School
District’s Superintendent, Anthony Godfrey, called The Supercast. He has been invited by states
all around the country to come speak and explain what he is doing, because the podcast has a
very high listener count. She was invited there to be a guest for Women’s History Month,
discussing many of the great things happening here. She acknowledged what a privilege it has
been to be a part of the Outstanding Educator Awards being presented throughout the school
district with the Jordan Education Foundation. She always loves doing that and thanking our
educators for their work. The recipient from Welby Elementary thanked the city for all the letters
of support and work done during Covid. She had some meetings with Intermountain, who is
celebrating 40 years of transplant services. They are working to be good community partners,
donating money to The League and WFRC last year to help with healthy community planning.
She had a meeting with The Point, where things are moving along. They are working to make
sure there is integration in transit between our community and The Point, to allow for transit
options for living and working within the local communities. She met with several residents,
including attending the Bingham Baseball Fundraiser with her husband, which was very well
done. She believes that Bingham High School is the only high school in the state that doesn’t
have access to bathrooms or locker rooms outside for players to use due to age. The parents in
the city set out to raise their own money to make it happen, and she suggested they reach out to
specific people at the school district to meet with them for help. She found out that happened and
went really well. She spent quite a bit of time with Wasatch Front Regional Council, working on
getting the regional transportation plan passed. For the last four years she has chaired the
regional growth committee that oversees that plan, which is updated every four years. There are
some updates on that plan that are especially important to our city, and as the city continues to
South Jordan City 4
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
grow one of those elements scheduled to be approved in May is the Central TRAX stop. She also
noted that there are many who might have a misunderstanding of WFRC’s role, who believe for
one reason or another that WFRC is making the decision about a gondola possibly going into
Little Cottonwood Canyon; however, WFRC has no authority over making that decision. There
might be some media attention after their meeting on Thursday, they will try and make everyone
understand their roles and that it’s UDOT making that decision. WFRC is required by law to
include any federal EIS projects in the long-term plan, which includes the gondola that could
potentially not even be needed. The legislature just approved $150 million to fund phase 1,
which does not include the gondola. The gondola issue wouldn’t be touched until later phases,
and may not even be needed if earlier phases are put into place and effective. She had a board
meeting with The League yesterday and some good conversations about the convention coming
up in April, with Tim Schriver as the keynote speaker. She also had quite a few meetings with
various city and community stakeholders, including the Miller Group, Merit Medical, etc.
F. Public Comment
Mayor Ramsey opened the public comment portion of the meeting.
Grant Howarth (Resident) - I am here tonight as an ordinary citizen of our great city. It is a
pleasure to speak with the council and mayor. More of my remarks will probably be directed at
staff and staffing positions as my purpose tonight is very simple, I would like to say thanks. I
have lived in this great community for 38 years and the city has helped along the way in many
ways. Recently I started feeling that I ought to say thank you for all that you do, certainly the
integration into the other areas of responsibility; the areas of responsibility of the administrative
staff and what they have done for me on a personal basis as I have lived here. I recognize that I
probably only see 1%-2% of what goes on in the city administration, and those who are in the
city who make things happen as well. Just before I was going to have a back operation I had
decided that I was going to work out at the community center, and took a couple of classes, used
the track, and even thought it didn’t work out and I still had to have the operation, the operation
led me up to a small handful of months afterwards and the leaves were falling. My neighbors
were fantastic and I was doing what I could as well, but it kind of got to the end of the season
and I still had leaves in the gutter, even though I got my lawn cleaned up. I called the utilities
department and said “I need some help, we don’t need this stuff downstream.” Sure enough,
within a day or two they were there to sweep the gutters and take care of it for Grant Howarth.
At age 80 I am not able to do all the things that I could before, but when we started here we had
lots of little trees planted. Our neighborhood is now lined with large oak trees and as they grew
they pushed up the sidewalks in a few spots. Sure enough, they came along and ground down the
sidewalks for me and others in the neighborhood. After my operation I had lots of pills left over,
and I really didn’t want to leave them around the house, so the police department provides a nice
drop box for all the extra medications. That doesn’t seem like anything, but it’s this growth of
little things that make nice things for us who live here. While talking about the police, the line on
Redwood Road turning left on to 10400 South was most of the way to Logan I think, and I being
somewhat of an impatient person had jumped that line and got up in the left hand turn lane. I had
the police officer pull me over, but he did it while kindly telling me what I had done to the others
who had waited in line and gave me a description of what 500 feet meant in terms of the
closeness of jumping the line. Along with those trees growing, we ended up with kind of a dark
South Jordan City 5
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
neighborhood in a way. We all had our own lights outside our houses, but it got kinda dark with
those trees getting 30 plus feet, and all of a sudden we had streetlights going up in the
neighborhood which made it feel a little safer; not that I have ever felt unsafe in our
neighborhood. Also, those leaves just pile up and pretty soon the city was offering dumpsters
over here by the tennis courts where we could throw them in there. We go along to city activities,
and I served on the history committee for a little while and got Eccles to give us a little money.
When the fundraising was done there was still a big pot of money needed and there the city was
again, which is another reason for me to stay thanks for doing what you do as cities. I am a
participant in parades, fireworks and the art exhibit last year with my family and a number of
other city activities that we enjoy as a family; not only as my children were growing up, but now
as my grandchildren are growing up with most of them still living in the city. Recently we have
had some heavy snowfall, and a few years ago after a decent storm we called the city and asked
them not to plow our little cul-de-sac as we wanted our kids to be able to play in it and told them
we would take care of it, and they did that. This year as we’ve had two major snowfalls, we have
had the blessing of having the snowplows come early; I expected them in 2-3 days, but they
came late in the evening of the first day, which has happened a few times this year. We thank
that department for assisting that way. Last summer. My wife and I decided we were going to
flip our strip. We live on a corner, so we have about 240 feet or so of park strip. I decided I
wanted to put some pavers in and add value to the property. However, in the process I found out
that you had to have 50% covered in foliage at maturity, and what I was doing wouldn’t do that,
but I still thought it was just as beautiful. I went to Conner and he was very kind, very generous
in his thoughts. It was fun to hear that some of the supplies were provided, thank you again for
that arrangement as it kind of helps out the process. Conner sent me up to Engineering because
he didn’t feel like he had the authority to approve a plan that didn’t meet the minimum
requirements. He handed the engineer the plan and the ideas, and he thoughtfully looked at it
with a new employee or student looking on, while explaining to that employee what he was
doing and thinking in the process. He not only signed off the project but he made sure that I had
a copy of the paper so that I would have evidence that what I was doing was good. Little things
to say thank you about include while I was laying these pavers, my stop sign, which gets used as
a goal post or something for the kids coming home from school, was teetering and I kept stuffing
it back in there. I asked the city to move the post 3 inches away from the curb, so I could get my
pavers in there without having to cut them and make it look like gingerbread. Within a day and a
half, they came and pulled the post, moved it over to exactly the right spot, and pounded it into
the ground even further than it was before, which was a nice thing as well. I just wanted to share
that I have lived here for 38 years and I have enjoyed this city and its gratefulness. One of the
very funnest of things has been to watch administration work from the sidelines. You have
probably just seen me once a year, the first week of January. I met with Gary at first, then was
sent to Dustin, and Dustin has been a shepherd of my personal project which is to make sure that
we recognize Freedom of Religion Day. Not only for Christians, but for Jews, Muslims, and all
the others. In the world, Christians are the most persecuted people, but here in the United States
the Jewish people are first in line, and our Muslim friends are second in line in terms of
persecution and we seem to have a way of being on two sides of things, rather than agreeing on
things and finding appropriate compromises. We need to learn more, and I think that the
Freedom of Religion Day that this body has approved, and that Dustin has shepherded over about
4 years of renewal, has allowed South Jordan to be a leader amongst cities around Salt Lake.
Two other cities have since adopted resolutions and we have two more on the hook for this
South Jordan City 6
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
coming year, hoping to get the Southwest Quadrant involved in that process and maybe get a
little rolling energy out of it to remind ourselves, which the resolutions and proclamations do,
that we need to be kind and civil to each other in the things that we say and do. I give thanks to
the vision of the administrators, certainly to you as a council and as mayor, but to our
administrators, managers who provide an output of vision and execution to that which we have
and enjoy, and with a vision to the future for this city because I consider it a great place to live
and a great place to raise my grandchildren.
G. Presentation Item
G.1. Proclamation Vietnam War Veterans Act of 2017 (By Mayor Dawn Ramsey)
Mayor Ramsey read the Proclamation recognizing Vietnam Veterans and their families.
G.2. 2022 State of the Chamber (South Valley Chamber of Commerce
President/CEO Jay Francis)
Jay Francis (President/CEO South Valley Chamber of Commerce) reviewed his prepared
presentation (Attachment A), discussing the 2022 State of the Chamber. He added that since last
August they have done 8-10 ribbon cuttings in South Jordan, and they appreciate the council and
mayor’s support.
H. Annexation Land Use Items
H.1. Presentation on Ordinance 2023-05, Petition of Annexation filed by Kennecott
Utah Copper, LLC and Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District (By City Attorney
Ryan Loose).
City Attorney Ryan Loose gave a brief history of Kennecott’s annexation petition and the city’s
current annexation plan, which just had the related policy recently updated last May. At that
time, only the related policy was changed, the map was not changed and has stayed the same. If
landowners of unincorporated areas want to annex into South Jordan, the city feels it is up to that
landowner’s discretion if they want to discuss annexation with the city. Over time, as everyone is
aware, over 4,000 acres at the west side of the city were annexed in, signing an MDA in about
2003; that is now the master planned community we call Daybreak, and the owner of the
property was originally Kennecott Rio Tinto. They were our partners for many years, divesting
themselves of that property at some point, and as we know it is in the hands of Larry H. Miller.
In the MDA for that development, there was an amendment to the interlocal agreement in 2007.
In that amendment, in addition to other terms, the following language was added:
“Master developer in the city agreed to engage in cooperative planning to support the
annexation of the contiguous area owned by the master developer (Rio Tinto Kennecott) and/or
its affiliates, successors, or assigned, generally located south of 11800 South and east of
Highway 111 consisting of approximately 1300 acres.”
South Jordan City 7
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
You can see by that language from 2007 that there were already discussions and thoughts of
possibly annexing more property, at that time mainly to our south, into the City of South Jordan.
As time passed, and as things happened, some of that area was annexed into our neighboring
city, Herriman. Things change, and recently discussions started, pursuant to that provision, of
whether South Jordan would be interested in annexing in that property, and an addition of
property west of the city. He shared an aerial map (Attachment B) that was included in the
annexation petition with a notice of intent in November 2022, and a petition in December 2022.
The applicant has looked at their property and future needs, and has expressed a desire to help
cities understand the long-term planning of the valley with respect to the impact their property
will have in the future. From the standpoint of good planning and wise land management, Rio
Tinto Kennecott has been moving forward and following the agreement made back in 2007.
There were no protests filed with the petition back in December 2022, and this is now before the
council tonight for a public hearing, after which the council can approve the annexation if they
desire. In an effort to be as public and transparent as possible, there is also an MOU
(memorandum of understanding) which is not part of the public hearing, but does include a
relevant portion. In the annexation, it has to be stated what the land is zoned, and master planned
communities in the City of South Jordan are zoned as the PC Zone. However, that zoning
requires a community structure plan, a lot of planning and other things that generally aren’t done
at the time of an annexation. In this case, without going to that extent, which would take not only
a lot of time and effort but a lot of engagement that the council would want public feedback on,
the applicant was willing to engage with the city in outlining some of the basic ideas of how this
would develop, which have been expressed in the MOU. The big deal points in the MOU related
to that are:
- A committed number of units, which works out to be the same density as is found in our
master planned community of Daybreak, at 5 units per acre.
- A commitment on parks, specifically a commitment to work with the city on building a
park within the first 10 years of beginning construction of this community, should they be
annexed in.
- A commitment on open space.
- Agreement that the applicant would apply for, and work through, all the obligations in the
PC Zone.
In addition to the MOU, which gets more information out to the public, there has been a public
engagement through the city’s social media. The applicant has worked with the city to provide a
website with videos, FAQs, and other information for the public which will continue to be
updated as things progress forward should the council decide to annex in this area. He added that
the proposed zoning is Agricultural A-5, which is 5 units per acre and essentially means no one
would develop that land. This was proposed as the city’s version of a holding zone until the PC
Zone is granted, which would define much more. If the council chooses to approve the
annexation, staff would finish up the process and in July the Lt. Governor’s Office would
approve the annexation. He then presented another map (Attachment C) showing the proposed
new boundaries of South Jordan, should the council choose to approve the annexation.
South Jordan City 8
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
Wayne Bradshaw (Applicant) shared his prepared presentation (Attachment D) and discussed
why they are bringing this annexation application to the city now, why this specific area, and
what the next steps are looking forward if the application is approved tonight. Regarding the
timing, Kennecott is celebrating 120 years this year in the State of Utah, and they are very
excited about that. As a mining company, they always have to looking to the future. Sometimes
they have to move dirt for two years before they hit an ore body, but at the same time they have
to continue producing ore to allow the rest of the operation to function successfully; they always
have to look to the future, plan for the future, and adjust for ongoing changes. This land being
considered tonight for annexation has always been looked at as having the potential for future
development. Previously, they have always had the luxury of having fields separating this land
and communities and housing developments; that is no longer the case as they have approved
developments to the south of the property and contemplation of developments on the eastern side
of the property. The challenge is that they know this property can be developed in the future, but
they are not part of those conversations when it comes to infrastructure, roads, pipelines, sewer,
placement of schools, etc., and they believe the annexation brings them to table. This clearly
defines the area that they want to develop, and it clearly defines that they are participants with
the other developments in the area, as well as those responsible for serving this area with utilities
and infrastructure. They may not anticipate developing immediately, but they can be a part of the
conversations today. As the other developers are looking at roads, they would not be dead-ending
them or creating cul-de-sacs, and when schools are being considered for placement they can
consider that future growth. They believe that when this property does come online for
development it would create a smoother and better transition for the city, and for the residents in
the area. Regarding why they chose this area, obviously their northern, eastern and southern
boundaries are dictated by other property owners. In terms of the western boundary, they still
own property to the west. They have done some reviews internally, and they have determined
that the property to the west will be needed in perpetuity; no matter what happens in the future,
they will need that for ongoing operations, so they won’t look to annex it in the future or to
develop it, but the remaining property has that potential. They are trying to send a clear message
to the community and the city that yes, this has potential for development, but as you look to the
west they are going to retain that in perpetuity. Finally, regarding what’s next, they feel that the
MOU, if approved, puts the guardrails around their planning process. There is a lot of planning
to do, and there will be more engagement with the city and residents, but the MOU sets those
standards by saying the density won’t be higher than any other planned community in the city, it
gives the open space requirements along with the timing of some of the parks, and sets those
boundaries allowing them to have a very clear and successful planning process. They have a
website, https://kennecottlands.com/, which is currently where his map in Attachment D can be
found, as well as an FAQs addressing annexation and the MOU, along with an email address
where the public can contact them with questions, concerns, or requests for more information;
that email address is info@kennecottlands.com. That website also has a high level timeline,
noting what they anticipate, when they plan on coming back to the city, and when they plan on
engaging the public further as they start looking at a master development agreement between
themselves and the City of South Jordan. He then played a video that can be found online at
South Jordan City 9
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
https://vimeo.com/810292267. As they were looking at what they could do with the future of this
land, as was referenced in the 2007 amendment, they discussed contemplating bringing that
conversation to the City of South Jordan, but they are excited for this opportunity because they
think there are a lot of synergies on previous experience and work together with Daybreak. There
are lessons learned on both sides, and he thinks they can apply that in a future development,
which is why they believe this is the right partnership and are excited for the future if this is
approved.
H.2. Public Hearing on Ordinance 2023-05
Mayor Ramsey opened the hearing for public comments.
Bob Paxton (Resident) – Thank you for your presentation, and Mayor and City Council thank
you for your work. I just have a few questions about this. You know that I am a water person,
wondering where our water is coming from, and I recently attended a water symposium at the U
of U Law School last week. There was a lot of surprising information there, some of which was
that there has been zero planning on how to replenish the water which we use, talking about the
Great Salt Lake and other places; we have some work to do. My first question is, where is the
water coming from. Is Kennecott bringing the water shares in, are they purchasing water from
the water bank; where is the water going to be coming from because for those of us living on the
eastern side of South Jordan we do have larger yards, trees, shrubs that need to be watered. I’d
like to thank Jason Rasmussen for helping me to understand the new water growth that we have
for our city, he has been very helpful. The other question I have besides water, that probably
other residents would have, especially as I am on the eastern side, is that expanding the city with
an additional 35,000-40,000 people will require some infrastructure on the east side to bring
water, sewer and such out to the west side; it seems like in this valley everything runs centered in
the middle of the valley, so what will be the tax implications. I know that Kennecott, or this
development, will be paying for the infrastructure there, but what are the other infrastructure
costs through taxation that other residents would incur. I think those are fair questions. Also,
with the development of Daybreak, I know that South Jordan had very little control, it was very
difficult to make even little tweaks, and I am wondering if South Jordan will have more control
than they have had with Daybreak. If they are going to be a part of South Jordan, it seems like
you guys should be able to make some decisions and not let them make every decision, as in
paragraph 9 of the agreement under the MDA.
Sam Bishop (Resident) – I am a Daybreak resident and felt like I had some things I wanted to
share as a resident, and give input on something a bit similar. I love South Jordan, and I love
Daybreak, and I feel like there is more of a separation between the two than is necessary. There
are a lot of things that are special about Daybreak that I wouldn’t want to lose. During the recent
snowfall for instance, knowing exactly who is responsible for what in terms of snow removal;
it’s like I still don’t quite understand it. The city and Daybreak both have Arts Councils,
community centers, parks, programs, etc., I just wish there was less of duplication, that South
Jordan and Daybreak felt more one. The other thing I wanted to mention is that I live along
South Jordan Parkway, and as all you guys know I am really into cycling and that sort of thing. I
South Jordan City 10
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
know two of our council members have been involved in crossings of South Jordan Parkway,
near schools and places like that. The agreement has been that once crossings are warranted, then
the developer would pay for those. When it comes to cars, we plan out 30 years ahead, and we
build for it now, but when it comes to other modes of transportation we kind of wait, and as I
have heard it described, we don’t build a bridge until we have seen enough people swim the
river; I hope we do things differently in the future. Speaking of that, I believe our most
dangerous intersections in the city are currently on the west side where people are crossing the
Mountain View Corridor, they are our busiest crosswalks and super dangerous. I love the fact
that there is talk about taking people under, doing grade separation on Highway 111, so thank
you for that.
Carol Sancho (Resident) – As this annexation will add on tens of thousands of new residents,
how is Salt Lake County planning to help with traffic. We have Mountain View Corridor that
seems to have space for expansion, but we are going to have much more traffic and I have a lot
of concerns about that. My second question is, given the history of the mine in that area and past
contamination, how is this construction going to manage potential lift of chemicals in the
process.
Mayor Ramsey closed the public comments portion of the hearing.
Council Member Shelton asked if Kennecott has any sense of timing in terms of when
construction could start, when homes might actually be occupied in this area.
Mr. Bradshaw responded that there is no specific time, as they are still doing a lot of planning
and analysis to determine when and where the best time would be to build and not interfere with
their ongoing operations. A large chunk of the property is probably 40-50 years out, probably the
U-111 western portion. As far as seeing the first house being built, there is still a lot of planning
left to do, but as the planning shows on their website, they anticipate coming back to the city in
the fall, as well as having some open houses in the fall, where they can better define that for
everyone.
Council Member Shelton asked to confirm if their thinking is to try and initiate the master
development agreement this fall.
Mr. Bradshaw responded yes. They think the MOU sets the guardrails for what will then move
into their conversations with the city on a MDA, and that will give them more clarity on when
and where things will happen. He would say they can better answer that question in the fall, in
regards to when they could potentially see the first house on the property.
Council Member Shelton noted that the MOU specifies a number of dwelling units that gets
them to the 5 units per acre number. He also noted that his understanding is the piece being
discussed to the west of U-111 possibly could never be developed, depending on mining
operations in the future. As a result, if that were to be the case, he assumes the MDA would
reduce that total number for the homes that would be built on the east side of U-111.
South Jordan City 11
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
Mr. Bradshaw said they anticipate the MDA will more clearly define when and where things
should be built, including where they units and density will go.
Attorney Loose added that specifically in Section 3 of the MOU, it talks about the number of
units being 11,450. There are also provisions in the agreement that talk about spreading those
units out over the property. It will be much more clearly defined in the MDA, when the planning
process is done. However, to alleviate concerns, both the applicant and the city are committed to
those units being spread out, if not equally, then roughly proportional to the area. There will be
clustering, just like in Daybreak, but all of the lots won’t end up east of U-111 with west of U-
111 being fallow, that is not being contemplated nor allowed by the MOU.
Council Member Shelton noted that part of the MOU defined completion of the larger park, but
the timing of completion of the smaller parks is not referenced in the MOU that he could recall.
He asked if that will be defined better in the MDA.
Attorney Loose said that certainly could be defined better in the MDA, as some of the comments
discussed what both the city and the applicant have learned from past experience and in
anticipation of this meeting tonight. One of the big focuses is that there is a need for a certain
kind of park, and that was a focus for the city in the MOU. As they come back to the MDA, if
this is approved, they would be visiting with the council, who will negotiate with the developer
on timing and location of the other parks, which will more than likely be west of U-111 if the 30
acre park is to the east. That will all be worked out through the process of the MDA.
Council Member Harris asked to address the water questions.
Attorney Loose responded that this property will be annexed into the Jordan Valley Water
Conservancy District’s area, and they have been planning for it. The Mayor is on that board, and
this has already been planned for and is where the water will be coming from. When discussing
water as a whole, conservation has been South Jordan’s focus for the last decade or more, and we
even have an employee dedicated to that. Our city is working on reducing water, and we are one
of the better cities in the state at doing that as the focus is there. The city also has obligations for
commitments of water that Jordan Valley will work with Rio Tinto on.
Mr. Bradshaw noted that they have worked with Jordan Valley Conservancy District and they
have asked Rio to try and develop in a way that cuts in half the per person per gallon per day
usage that is the current standard in the state. That is one of Rio’s goals that they are working
towards, but there is still a lot of planning on how that works and what that will look like, as well
as how they will apply that.
Attorney Loose added that the infrastructure and capital costs, as long as they are to serve the
development, are built by the developer and done according to the city’s standards and
specifications, which were recently readopted this year with many changes brought by our City
Engineer.
City Manager Gary Whatcott noted that over the years Jordan Valley anticipated the growth in
the Salt Lake County area, that all of Salt Lake County would be developed, other than the
South Jordan City 12
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
mountain ranges, to some degree. In doing so, they made large purchases into various reservoirs
in the Uintahs. With that, there are a lot of conveyance costs to bring that water, including blocks
of water out of Strawberry Reservoir, which we have yet to use. There has been planning and a
lot of exercises, understanding what the growth would be at buildout for Salt Lake County, and
this potential annexation of property was contemplated as part of that. Due to those conveyance
fees to bring that water farther away, there are different costs. This property that could be
annexed in to the city will actually have a different rate for those payers that includes paying for
part of that conveyance fee for the water to be brought here. Jordan Valley has said they have
water blocks for that area, and part of how it is paid for is through a different rate.
Attorney Loose noted that the capital costs, the building of the infrastructure for the system is
built by the developer, and that’s why the city is currently working with the current owners of
Daybreak on building their next tank and those related costs. The operations costs are paid for
mainly by the rates, but Jordan Valley also has the ability to tax and he suggested that anyone
who wants more information on how they divide their rates versus their taxes to contact Jordan
Valley. The owners and buyers in this new development will clearly know what the rates are,
they are not hidden and are open for everyone to see.
Council Member Harris also noted that regarding sewer, if annexed this area will be annexed into
South Valley Sewer. He sits on the board there and there have been discussions on what that will
look like and there will be an analysis done, to include whether there will be separate impact fees
for that area, as there is a lot to evaluate. That will be done when the owners request to be
annexed into that sewer system. He acknowledged that many residents have questions regarding
the financial impact of this potential annexation and asked for comments on that.
Attorney Loose responded that the capital costs of anything are borne by the developer, to
include capital costs of parks, public safety, etc. That is why we have impact fees, as we know
we will need additional stations out in that area for fire and police, and all of that is built into
formulas through master plans. The ongoing operational and maintenance costs, including
employees, are paid through tax revenue. As homes come in, the values of those properties are
much higher than sitting fallow currently, and those homes will pay property taxes. The city of
South Jordan for at least 15 years didn’t raise taxes, and there have only been two raises in the
last 4-5 years, with the most recent one being to cover mostly public safety related expenses due
to inflation and climbing costs of both construction of facilities and employees. How things go in
the future will not be tied directly to this development, but they will be tied directly to having
and operating a city.
Council Member Harris agreed that tax increases recently have been to address the rising costs of
public safety, and asked to have some of the things addressed that would have to be done if this
property was annexed and developed in the future.
Attorney Loose responded that the public thinks taxes go up every year and capture inflation, but
they don’t; that only happens when the council moves the tax line. That was done this last year to
capture inflation, but that isn’t done every year. The city is working with Rio Tinto Kennecott on
land donations and backbone/infrastructure of roads as much as possible, as early as possible in
South Jordan City 13
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
the process of planning and zoning, so things are well known and everyone knows where things
will go. That is part of that in-depth planning process that is being done currently, and that’s why
the MOU is a basic skeleton of the highest priorities and not focused on where everything is
going. There is infrastructure language throughout the agreement that addresses the fact that the
city and the developer will work together to locate everything as early in the process as possible.
Doing this saves the city a lot of money, saves the developer money as they plan, and it helps in
the planning process to know where things go.
Council Member Marlor acknowledged a comment by Mr. Paxton, referencing the MDA and
noted it has already been discussed tonight several times; however, he believes Mr. Paxton’s
point was whether or not they will have the same guardrails in place with this additional potential
land. He asked for comments on the fact that the city will have an MDA, and said that the city
will include all the guardrails they can. Part of why this will be successful is because we have
done this before, learned from it, and it will have some additional things to keep everyone on
track.
Attorney Loose confirmed they will have all that, and he also addressed the question of whether
or not the city will have a little bit more control as things adapt over time. One of the lessons
learned that has been discussed by the planning commission and council is that at times it seems
like the master developer is able to adapt to things like the economy in 2009-10, by changing the
product; the city wants to be able to give that level of flexibility to anybody developing
thousands and thousands of acres and homes, but at the same time being able to learn lessons
from the Daybreak process and what has happened over time so the city understands better by, if
not control, then certainly better knowledge and understanding. Part of the planning process the
city has discovered with the original owner and the current owner is that they integrate the city
much more in the planning process than the owner in the middle, and that is part of what they are
going to try and build better in the MDA; there have already been discussions regarding that as
this is essentially partnership over a long period of time.
Council Member Marlor addressed Ms. Sancho’s questions regarding traffic concerns, noting
that the city has hard-coded in the MOU that the development will adhere to the city’s
transportation master plan. The city only has so much control over pieces of transportation in the
valley, specifically this quadrant.
Attorney Loose said there is a master plan for the city, not for this area specifically because it’s
not in the city yet. However, upon annexation the city will begin to work on the master plans for
all the necessary parts of that area to include parks, transportation, etc. The city also follows the
WFRC’s 2050 plan, and that has a lot of those principles, if not actual layouts of where things
go. Both Rio Tinto Kennecott and the City of South Jordan, specifically our head engineer, have
been heavily involved in looking at a realignment of U-111, or Bacchus Highway, which is
going to change in the near future. There is significant investment being put into that, and there
will be big pushes to extend light rail and other things. The city doesn’t control those processes,
but we can push for those things because they made the transportation flow better, as
transportation is one of the biggest, if not the biggest concern with any development. The fact
South Jordan City 14
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
that Rio Tinto Kennecott has chosen to come into South Jordan at a density of 5 units per acre,
which is 2 units per acre lower than an adjacent master planned community, that itself reduces
the number of cars significantly and it’s a partnership that builds a great product as you can see
in the master planned community we currently have. Mountain View Corridor, the TRAX line all
came when it was green field because this developer saw the vision of putting it in first, and that
is the partner the city would have should the council choose to accept the annexation. Mountain
View Corridor is also being funded to convert to a freeway on the south end first in the next 5-10
years.
Mayor Ramsey noted that the south portion of Mountain View Corridor, from where it ends all
the way up to Old Bingham Highway, our portion of Mountain View Corridor, is slated and
funded to be converted to a freeway first out of the entire system because of what’s happening
here and because of what’s been planned in partnership for so long. That has been a heavy lift,
and a lot of work to make sure that the legislature understands it, that the regional transportation
plan understands it, that people get what is happening and that this is part of due diligence good
planning to mitigate the impact of what is happening on really the only land left in Salt Lake
County to develop. That will be key in helping our east-west transportation, because if we can
strengthen and expand, which is planned, on the U-111 corridor and Mountain View Corridor,
along with finishing the conversion of Bangerter Highway to a full freeway so people don’t have
to travel so far east to move north and south, that will make a big difference on our roads.
Mr. Bradshaw added that it’s important to Rio that this is an area that the future residents want to
live in, a place where they enjoy living. That is why they do want to be a part of those
conversations about traffic and potential solutions. As stated, Mountain View Corridor and
TRAX at the time they were developing Daybreak were important to them, and they worked hard
to make sure that this part of the valley received that service in a timely manner. Obviously, they
want to be part of that conversation and make sure residents now and in the future enjoy living in
this area. Regarding the land and whether it’s safe to build a home on, at Kennecott they have a
culture of safety. They start every meeting with a safety share about how they make sure they are
safe at work, at home, and that you can come to work and feel like it’s a safe place. That goes for
this land as well, they want to make sure that it’s a safe place for people. They have done
evaluations, and they know that it is a safe place for people to live.
Council Member Zander noted, in regards to the land contamination, shared that she has lived in
Daybreak for 19 years and she remembers people living outside of Daybreak saying you can’t
plant a garden because the land is so tainted, along with social media comments this week saying
there are tons of tailings on this land, and how irresponsible to put houses out there. Daybreak
was cleaned up to the EPA standards, and some of the surrounding areas were not necessarily as
strictly cleaned up. Her land is actually really clean because they had the EPOS coming in and
checking.
Mr. Bradshaw couldn’t speak to Daybreak, but with this proposed annexation land, they would
remediate in areas that need it; they would not build on land that is unsafe.
South Jordan City 15
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
Council Member Zander assumes that Rio will be doing the same things to this proposed land if
annexed that they did with Daybreak to ensure everything is safe.
Josh Brown (Applicant) noted that the Daybreak project itself actually went deeper and
removed more soil for higher than the EPA standards to build, and that’s probably part of why
it’s difficult to grow stuff in the ground in certain spots. There has been some brown-filled site,
meaning there was mining activities that took place on this, a large portion of this has been no
mining. Initially studies environmentally show that this is at a level that would be Daybreak
comparable or less. If and where there are areas of contamination discovered, they will be
cleaned up to the strictest standard to have homes built where they can be. If something comes
up where there would be an issue, homes would not be built, but they would also be back here
discussing it with the city and the community.
Mayor Ramsey added that the developer eats the cost of that, including remediation.
Council Member Zander referenced Paragraph 5 in the MOU, where they are trying to advocate
differently for our parks in this new development than done in Daybreak, where it was said that
the developer had to deliver parks, but there was no timeline. This MOU will get more detailed,
but right now she feels this is a really big win for our city that already we have factored in parks
and some timelines required in the development for when that MDA is agreed upon.
Attorney Loose said it’s important to note for every city that during discussions and negotiations
things are agreed upon, and getting all the infrastructure and parks on there was a high priority
for the city and Rio Tinto’s side as well.
Mr. Brown added that the path will be to do it in a timely fashion to make sense with the
development, so if it could be less than 10 years and it makes sense, they would absolutely be
doing that. A comment was made by Attorney Loose, that the MDA with Daybreak was
different; revolutionary in some ways, but there are ways to make it better and streamline
appropriately. Regarding the goal to have no distinction from the City of South Jordan, they want
this to be a continuation of those things that are great with South Jordan.
Council Member Zander wanted to repeat that they, over the last week as a city council, have
engaged with their attorneys and Rio Tinto. She has been very impressed with the way they have
been able to work together. Regarding open space in Paragraph 5, it references that 25% of the
project, including parks, will be defined as open space; there was only 20% open space required
in the Daybreak MDA.
Mr. Brown noted that they appreciate the city’s input as well, as they are looking at this as a joint
effort. They recognize the conversations related to traffic, as he grew up in the area and knows
that the east-west connections in the valley are a challenge. Conversations on bike lanes include
having active transportation, as well as the infrastructure and road to be adequate and above.
Things are being discussed like wildlife corridors, etc., that they want to bring to the community
and the residents with a holistic approach.
South Jordan City 16
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
Council Member Zander noted that Daybreak has an excellent pattern of connectivity. In
neighboring areas you have to turn in and get out, and that bothered her the first year she was in
Daybreak; however, they had a big master plan that she didn’t understand 19 years ago, and now
we see it in fruition. There are multiple ways in and out of the community, and she expects and
plans for everyone working to make things connect to the new part of the community.
Mr. Brown noted that he and Mr. Bradshaw have spent time in other cities as well, discussing
connectivity, as it needs to be holistic.
Council Member McGuire is very grateful for the details worked out thus far. Many of his
remaining questions will be resolved in the MDA. He did ask for the densities of the surrounding
projects in this area.
Director of Planning Steven Schaefermeyer noted that staff pulled some of the MDAs for other
developments and was able to share that the Olympia Project, previously Olympia Hills, was first
approved by the county at 9.5 units per acre, and when annexed into Herriman it was about 6.78
units per acre. The Suburban Land Reserve properties, or Mountain View Village in Riverton is
6.99 units per acre. Lastly, the Woods Ranch and Jones Ranch planned development in West
Jordan, essentially the majority of their west side, are both 5 units per acre max; they have a PC
zone that was modeled after South Jordan’s PC zone that dictates that 5 units per acre maximum.
Mr. Bradshaw added that they really want to emphasize that this is all about good, smart
planning for them. They do not want to build something that doesn’t fit or feel right for the
community. They appreciate again the dialogue regarding what that looks like, as they agree to
the 5 units per acre, the additional open space, and making sure they use water appropriately.
They have gathered all that information, and now they will sit down and have very robust
conversations with their planner before bringing that back to the city and showing what that
looks like in a MDA.
Director Schaefermeyer noted that units per acre is a hard concept, as the difference between 5
units per acre and 6 units per acre is hard to conceptualize across a property. If the densities were
applied in the Olympia and Riverton project to this acreage, they would be talking about over
4000 additional units. The difference in those overall densities really do make a difference over
the expanse of 2000 acres.
Council Member Zander added that she believes those projects also did not factor in open space,
like South Jordan has.
Director Schaefermeyer said he couldn’t speak to all the projects in terms of whether open space
was calculated, but he does know that the SLR Property has a large portion as commercial and he
doesn’t know how that worked out in the details. He noted that Olympia does include some open
space, but that agreement is very different and it’s hard to compare the two agreements.
Attorney Loose said that it’s important to note that those additional 4000 units that were the
difference in the overall units per acre would create a significant amount of additional traffic and
he asked staff what that would be in average trips towards traffic calculation daily.
South Jordan City 17
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
Director of Engineering Brad Klavano responded that a single family home works out to about
10 trips per day, townhomes is probably 6.7 to 7 trips per day.
Attorney Loose said that those amounts multiplied by even a portion of the 4000 additional units
would make a large difference for things like transportation, water, etc., and that is part of the
overall picture.
Council Member McGuire said this is a great and unique time for this to move forward. Two of
our council members live in the Daybreak community, and they have grown through some of
those trials, along with some of the wonderful things that have taken place there. Everyone on
the council has been here for a while, so there is a lot of additional insight that can be given as
things move forward with creating this new MDA. He would like residents to understand that
perspective they are able to bring at this time, along with the experience of city staff because of
the length of time everyone has been around and their levels of experience. Also, Mr. Bishop
brought up the duplicate services in Daybreak and that sometimes it feels as if there is a divide
between the Daybreak community and South Jordan as a city, noting that he, Council Member
McGuire, personally thinks this will actually help the city in bringing everyone together. It will
not be Daybreak as the west side, as we are bringing in all these additional homes and it really
brings the opportunity to unite everyone with the additional things that will be going on out there
including expanding city services. Also, having opportunities like the two art councils has
allowed everyone the opportunity to have extra art brought into the city that we otherwise would
not have; there are plusses and minuses to it, but he still believes that adding an additional
community to the city will help unite everyone.
Council Member Harris believes the rest of his questions will be answered with the MDA. He
appreciates all the time and interactions that have been spent on this, as the applicant has been
very cordial and straight forward with completely open communication lines; that has certainly
been appreciated.
Mr. Brown said Rio feels the same about their interactions with the city, and encouraged the city
to contact Rio at any time with concerns or questions.
Council Member Marlor thanked the group of Kennecott employees who are here tonight. He
was fortunate to work with a group back around 2000, when this was happening initially, and he
would also express appreciation to them. He really is grateful for the staff members, either still
here or moved on, who were here when this was done initially for the Daybreak MDA. There
were many mistakes made, but they have certainly learned a lot along the way and he thinks this
go around will be even better and he is excited to see it happening again.
Mayor Ramsey noted that as a city, they have gone above and beyond what is required and what
is normally done for noticing a public hearing. There were extra-large signs placed, repeated
social media posts, everything the city could do to make sure residents know that this is
happening tonight and that they have a chance to weigh in here. The landowner gets to decide
what they want to do with their land. Rio Tinto Kennecott came to South Jordan for the original
agreements from 20 years ago, and said they would still like to entertain that and talk about
South Jordan City 18
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
annexing into the city. There was always an opportunity that they could have decided to create
their own community and incorporate on their own with impact on the neighboring South Jordan,
but with the city having no say; that is always an option with land this size that is
unincorporated. She appreciates Rio staying true to agreements that were made by people here
before most of us here tonight, that this conversation would happen, and that Rio would come
and talk to the city and that the city would consider it with these discussions. She thinks that was
wise, and she thinks it is far better for South Jordan City to annex this land into our city with a
MDA, to build upon our history and proven track record as collaborative partners of creating
successful, safe and well integrated communities. That is so much better than Rio incorporating
on their own, with the city still having that impact but without impact fees or a say in what
happens. There has been a lot of inaccurate information floated around, a lot of accusatory and
interesting things that have been said, and that tends to go along with something like this. People
hear a little bit, or they have their own personal biases, but she believes that both Rio Tinto and
South Jordan City have both tried to be incredibly transparent and really share the truthful
information. She appreciates Rio’s efforts to create an initial website of questions as these
discussions are going on, as things have not been decided yet and they are still figuring out what
the annexation would look like. This is the way things should have been done, and she wants the
public to know that when this was initiated by Rio Tinto reaching out to start that conversation
that was in the original agreement about annexation, the number one concern for this elected
body was to make things clear that they didn’t want this to be a financial burden on the rest of
the current residents of South Jordan. They made it clear they would not entertain many
discussions if the result is going to be a financial impact of raised taxes and additional obligation
to the residents already living here. She appreciates that is what is being made to happen, and if
this land annexes into South Jordan it is with that clear understanding. We all live here, there are
going to be more people that come here, and this is the only undeveloped land in Salt Lake
County. The landowner has made their decision, they would like to annex their land into South
Jordan City, and there have been discussions entertained and a great deal of information shared.
This is not a fast process, and a MDA would take a long time, so she wants it understood that the
A-5 zoning is clearly noted in the MOU as a holding zone for what will become 5 units to the
acre if this is approved.
Mr. Bradshaw thanked the council and the mayor, along with the staff. There have been a lot of
conversations, a lot of back and forth to understand where everyone is at, and they appreciate
everyone’s time and effort that has been put into this. They also appreciate the guardrails given
to them if the MOU is approved, to move forward in an MDA. He hopes the public understands
that this is just the beginning of a process, there is a lot of planning that has to happen and a lot
of information to come forth. He understands the concern that there is 2000 acres potentially
being brought into the city, and asking what that means. He thinks the MOU puts up those
guardrails so they can signal that the density will not be over the other MDA in the city. With
that in place, they can start adding those finite details and he encouraged any member of the
public with questions or concerns to visit https://www.kennecottlands.com/, and there is an email
where questions can be sent. He thinks it will be helpful if they continue to see the same question
over and over, they can update the FAQs to address what is a general public question, and make
South Jordan City 19
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
sure to take note of that and engage with the city as well to share what they are hearing and make
sure information is getting to the public.
H.3. Ordinance 2023-05, Annexing the area and extending the corporate limits of
South Jordan City, Utah, to include the area described in Exhibit A and amending the
South Jordan City Zoning Map to designate and zone the annexed area as
Agricultural A-5 upon its annexation into the City of South Jordan. RCV
Council Member McGuire motioned to approve Ordinance 2023-05, Annexing the area
and extending the corporate limits of South Jordan City as stated. Council Member Zander
seconded the motion; Roll call vote 5-0, unanimous in favor.
H.4. Resolution R2023-18, Authorizing the Mayor to sign the Memorandum of
Understanding between the City of South Jordan and Kennecott Utah Copper, LLC
for the development of a Master Planned Community in the City of South Jordan.
RCV (By City Attorney Ryan Loose)
Attorney Loose reviewed background information from the Council Report and previous
discussions tonight.
Council Member Marlor noted that while his signature is not required on the MOU, he would
love to have the entire council eventually sign the MDA. The council and mayor agreed with that
suggestion.
Council Member Marlor motioned to approve Resolution R2023-18, Authorizing the
Mayor to sign the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of South Jordan and
Kennecott Utah Copper, LLC as stated. Council Member Shelton seconded the motion;
Roll Call Vote was 5-0, unanimous in favor.
Mayor Ramsey noted the understated significance of what has happened tonight. She grew up in
the shadows of the mine being from Magna, and then she moved to the outer edges of South
Jordan, literally still living in the shadow of the mine and the Oquirrh Mountains her whole life.
To see this land that has never been brought forward in this way, being proposed as part of a
long-term vision for how best to integrate that land eventually and still protect mining
operations, provide appropriate buffers and the significant impact those operations have to the
GDP of our state is monumental. In addition to that, it has been 20 years since the boundaries of
our city have grown, and even though this is a 40 year project, just having the boundaries change
is significant. Bringing Rio back to the table now, allowing them to be a part of the discussions
on infrastructure in advance as a long-range planning exercise, make her so proud of this city
because that is what we do best. We are very good at that, with a proven track record of it, along
with Rio. There are always people resistant to change, even though we may not be alive when
this all happens, but this is the best thing that could have been decided by these landowners in
terms of making sure they get it right with the most renowned and award winning proven track
record in the country in many ways. So much time has gone into ensuring this is the right thing
for both parties, and on behalf of all the interests both parties represent. She often wants to drive
out west, up U-111, along this property, the undeveloped and contemplated areas. She looks out
South Jordan City 20
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
over the growth and drives north and south along where the other developments have been
approved, and she looks at this land a lot. She finds peace in doing that, and she can almost see
what this undeveloped land could look like. She loved the video that was shown, and she is
proud of this partnership, along with the concern that was shown by everyone working on this to
make sure they get this right; making sure they can maintain and ensure the quality of life for the
residents who live in South Jordan now, and for those who will come. The others are going to
come, and it’s critical that this is done right as this is the best next step to make sure that is the
case for the entire region.
I. Staff Reports and Calendaring Items
Attorney Loose noted that tomorrow is the HTRZ application review for the Central Station area,
out in Daybreak, with the committee deciding on its approval. Everyone is invited to attend, it
begins at 2:30 p.m. at Station 64.
Mayor Ramsey noted that they are required to make and keep an audio recording of the meeting,
which will be available after the meeting.
Attorney Loose noted that if enough council members decide to attend, City Recorder Anna
Crookston can put together a potential quorum if needed. In the next week, several members of
staff will be meeting with their congressional delegation to advocate for some of the projects and
other things going on in our city. There will also be a pre-meeting on Friday at 10:00 a.m.
Director Klavano shared that the Dental Office going in at 11400 South 1300 West has to get the
sewer in, and they want to do that next week during Spring Break as there will be less traffic
with school out. They will have to close 1300 West for three to four days at that location, and
there is a detour plan with the reader boards ready. The sewer is down about 25 feet, out in the
middle of the road, and that’s the only way to do it. The reader boards are supposed to go up
tomorrow, and he will talk with Rachael to get the information out electronically as well. Also,
there is some federal money to widen Riverfront Parkway from 11400 South up to the first
roundabout to make that two lanes in each direction. It has been on the plans for a little while,
but they are currently doing the environmental for it and there will be a public meeting here at
City Hall on Thursday, April 6th at 6:00 p.m. When it gets closer he will send it out as a
reminder, but the actual project probably won’t happen until next year.
Mayor Ramsey brought up potential flooding in the city, and the efforts that have been made.
There are three 15 foot long dumpsters full of sand, along with 1000 sandbags and shovels for
residents to use if they need them for sandbags. Those resources will be moved to where they are
needed, and she wants to remind everyone that staff is mindful that there are areas of the city that
could flood, and that there are supplies ready should residents need them.
Communications Manager Rachael Van Cleave said that in terms of messaging, there is now a
FAQ on the city website, as they have received a lot of questions about potential flooding. There
is a lot of great information there, and they are also encouraging people, if they don’t find the
answers to their questions there, to send staff a message through the link provided on the website
so they can find the answers and include them in the FAQ.
South Jordan City 21
City Council Meeting
March 21, 2023
Council Member Zander asked if there is a map being provided that shows the areas more prone
to flooding.
Manager Van Cleave responded that our GIS Coordinator Matt Jarman sent several very helpful
map links regarding the different flood zone areas, those are included in the FAQs and available
to anyone looking.
Council Member Shelton motioned to adjourn the City Council meeting. Council
Member McGuire seconded the motion; vote was unanimous in favor.
ADJOURNMENT
The March 21, 2023 City Council Meeting adjourned at 9:16 p.m.
This is a true and correct copy of the March 21, 2023 City Council Meeting Minutes, which
were approved on April 4, 2023.
South Jordan City Recorder
Attachment A
2022
YEAR IN REVIEW
WHAT WE DO
IN THE
NEWS
STRATEGIC
BRANDING
UPDATES
SOUTH VALLEY TOURISM
65,000
ROOM NIGHTS
102
TRADE SHOW CLIENT MEETINGS
$37 16
MAJOR EVENTS
MILLION
5
MAJOR SITE VISITS
WOMEN IN BUSINESS
2000+ $11,000 10
Feminine Hygiene Products In Scholarships to 11 Women in Business
Donated in Partnership with Junior Women In Business Luncheons
the Period Project recipients.
BUSINESS INSTITUTE
18 35 15
GRADUATES GRADUATES GRADUATES
15
GRADUATES
GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS & PUBLIC POLICY
6 20+
South Valley Chamber Bills Tracked During 2022
Delegates on Annual Legislative Session
Washington, D.C. Advocacy
Trip
SMALL BUSINESS COMMITTEE
SOURCE 11 LAUNCHED
Small Business Summit Podcasts Released Small Business Saturday
320%
INCREASE IN ATTENDEES
• NEW Brand & Format
• 32 Business Service Booths
• 255 Attendees
• World Class Keynote Speakers
• Nicole Tanner (SWIG)
• Bennett Maxwell (Dirty Dough)
LET’S DO LUNCH
Speakers include:
Jason Hewlett
Chad Hymas
4 10
Cities in Which our Let’s Do Let’s Do Lunch Events
James Hadlock Lunch Events Were Hosted
Dr. Matt Townsend
Kem Gardner
EXECUTIVE FORUM & IN THE KNOW
Speakers include:
4 Speaker Wilson
President Adams 5
Members of Federal Delegation Robert Spendlove Executive Forum and In the
Present for Washington D.C. Senator Mike Lee Know Events
Update. Senator Mitt Romney
Rep. John Curtis
Rep. Burgess Owens
GOLF TOURNAMENTS
$109K
Raised to Support Chamber
Programs
• 374 Players
• River Oaks
• South Mountain
• Glenmoor
Cydni Tetro
Mark & Sally Dietlein
Steve Starks
Abacus Accounting
(Small Business of the Year)
YEAR OF THE MEMBER
MEET THE NEW
NEW MEMBER
MEMBER
ORIENTATION
LUNCHEON
SOUTH
JORDAN
RIBBON
CUTTINGS
BUSINESS BOOTCAMPS
SOUTH
JORDAN
BUSINESS
COMMITTEE
NEW MEMBERS
Welcome!
Bienvenue!
Bem-vindo
Willkommen!
řαŃĺ Ľ
δŹ∟ŃŚΓ
Välkommen
Hoş geldin Witaj!
ń
¡Bienvenido!
Benvenuto
��គមន៍
Selamat datang 欢
175
New Members
迎
Attachment B
0 0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
Attachment C
Proposed Boundary
Source: City of South Jordan GIS
Produced: 20 March 2023
Page Size: 11x17
Kennecott Annexation Attachment D
• Approximately 2285 Acres
• Effective Long-Term
Planning
• Water
• Sewer
• Transportation
• Community Needs
• Next Steps
• Kennecottlands.com
1
Agenda
CITY OF SOUTH JORDAN
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 2023 at 6:30 PM
Notice is hereby given that the South Jordan City Council will hold a City Council Meeting at 6:30 p.m.
on Tuesday, March 21, 2023, in person in the City Council Chambers, located at 1600 W. Towne Center
Drive, South Jordan, Utah, and virtually via Zoom phone and video conferencing. Persons with disabilities
requesting assistance should contact the City Recorder at least 24 hours prior to the Meeting. The Agenda
may be amended and an Executive Session may be held at the end of the Meeting. Times listed are
approximate and may be accelerated or delayed.
In addition to in-person attendance, individuals may join via phone or video, using Zoom. Note, attendees
joining virtually may comment during public comment, or a public hearing virtually. To comment during
public comment, or public hearing virtually, the individual must have their video on and working during
their comments. Attendees who wish to present photos or documents to the City Council must attend in
person. Those who join via phone may listen, but not participate in public comment or public hearings.
In the event the Meeting is disrupted in any way that the City in its sole discretion deems inappropriate,
the City reserves the right to immediately remove the individual(s) from the Meeting and, if needed, end
virtual access to the Meeting. Reasons for removing an individual or ending virtual access to the Meeting
include but are not limited to the posting of offensive pictures, remarks, or making offensive statements,
disrespectful statements or actions, and other any action deemed inappropriate.
Ability to participate virtually is dependent on an individual’s internet connection. To ensure comments
are received regardless of technical issues, please have them submitted in writing to the City Recorder,
Anna Crookston, at acrookston@sjc.utah.gov by 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Instructions on how
to join virtually are below.
Join South Jordan City Council Meeting Virtually:
• Join on any device that has internet capability.
• Zoom link, Meeting ID and Password will be provided 24 hours prior to meeting start time.
• Zoom instructions are posted https://ut-southjordan.civicplus.com/241/City-Council.
Regular Meeting Agenda: 6:30 p.m.
A. Welcome, Roll Call, and Introduction: By Mayor, Dawn R. Ramsey
B. Invocation: Director of City Commerce, Brian Preece
C. Pledge of Allegiance: Director of Strategy & Budget, Don Tingey
D. Minute Approval:
D.1. March 7, 2023 City Council Study Meeting Minutes
D.2. March 7, 2023 City Council Meeting Minutes
E. Mayor and Council Reports: 6:35 p.m.
City Council Meeting - March 21, 2023 Page 1 of 3
F. Public Comment: 6:50 p.m
This is the time and place for any person who wishes to comment on items not scheduled
on the agenda for public hearing. Any person or group wishing to comment on any item not
otherwise scheduled for public hearing on the agenda may address the City Council at this point
by stepping to the microphone, or if joining electronically, by raising their hand and giving his or
her name for the record. Note, if joining electronically, photos or documents will not be accepted
through Zoom and you must attend City Council Meeting in-person. Comments should be limited
to not more than three (3) minutes, unless additional time is authorized by the Chair. Groups
wishing to comment will be asked to appoint a spokesperson. Items brought forward to the
attention of the City Council will be turned over to staff to provide a response outside of the City
Council Meeting. Time taken on non-agenda items, interrupts the process of the noticed agenda.
In rare cases where it is determined appropriate to address items raised from public comments,
these items will be noted and may be brought back at the conclusion of the printed agenda.
G. Presentation Item: 7:00 p.m.
G.1. Proclamation Vietnam War Veterans Recognition Act of 2017. (By Mayor, Dawn R.
Ramsey)
G.2. 2022 State of the Chamber. (South Valley Chamber of Commerce President/CEO, Jay
Francis)
H. Annexation Land Use Items: 7:30 p.m.
H.1. Presentation on Ordinance 2023-05, Petition of Annexation filed by Kennecott Utah
Copper, LLC and Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District. (By City Attorney, Ryan
Loose)
H.2. Public Hearing on Ordinance 2023-05.
H.3. Ordinance 2023-05, Annexing the area and extending the corporate limits of South
Jordan City, Utah, to include the area described in Exhibit A and amending the South
City Zoning Map to designate and zone the annexed area as Agricultural A-5 upon its
annexation into the City of South Jordan. RCV
H.4. Resolution R2023-18, Authorizing the Mayor to sign the Memorandum of
Understanding between the City of South Jordan and Kennecott Utah Copper LLC for the
development of a Master Planned Community in the City of South Jordan. RCV (By City
Attorney, Ryan Loose)
I. Staff Reports and Calendaring Items: 8:50 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
STATE OF UTAH )
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
City Council Meeting - March 21, 2023 Page 2 of 3
I, Anna Crookston, the duly appointed City Recorder of South Jordan City, Utah, certify that the
foregoing City Council Agenda was emailed to at least one newspaper of general circulation within the
geographic jurisdiction of the public body. The agenda was also posted at the principal office of the public
body and also posted on the Utah State Public Notice Website http://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html and
on South Jordan City’s website at www.sjc.utah.gov. Published and posted March 17, 2023.
City Council Meeting - March 21, 2023 Page 3 of 3
Get email alerts for South Jordan
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.