City Council
Regular MeetingSteelton, PA · June 6, 2011
Minutes
Steelton Borough
Council Meeting
June 6, 2011
The regular monthly meeting was called to order at 6:32 p.m. by President,
Jeffery Wright, with the pledge of allegiance, followed by a moment of silence.
In Attendance: Absent:
Jeffery Wright
Stephen Shaver
Michael Albert
Dennis Heefner
MaryJo Szada
Maria Marcinko
Raymond Spencer
Mayor Thomas Acri
David A. Wion, Solicitor
Douglas E. Brown, Borough Manager
Kathy I. Sosnowski, Executive Assistant
Michael Musser, Consultant
Matt Cichy, Herbert, Rowland & Grubic
Chris Bauer, Herbert, Rowland & Grubic
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS AS PRESENTED:
A motion was made by Mr. Shaver, seconded by Ms. Marcinko and approved by all
present to approve the minutes of the May 16, 2011 meeting with the following notation:
{On page 7, the last line should read: but didn’t create a new subdivision land
development plan. Landscaping was provided by a new subdivision land
development plan. – Omit the words “ordinance”}
EXECUTIVE SESSION HELD BETWEEN MEETINGS
None.
PUBLIC COMMENT: Agenda Items Only
None.
COMMUNICATION:
Deb Butler & Family – Thank you note shared with members of Council.
Letter to DCOCED acknowledged the reduction in 2011 CDBG funding to the Adams
Street Project.
-1-
Steelton Borough
Council Meeting
June 6, 2011
Letter to Rev. Tucker – Back to School Block Party on August 13, 2011 is approved per
the recommendation of the Steelton Police Department. Mr. Heefner questioned using
the term “sawhorses” and whether they are appropriate height for blocking a road; the
Chief and Mr. Conjar will confer on the use of blockades.
Foreman & Caraciolo, PC – letter with the revised draft of the MOU between the
Dauphin County Redevelopment Authority and the Borough of Steelton for the Adams
Street properties was shared.
PERCS Traffic Signals - letter regarding discontinuation of Multisonics Brand Traffic
Controllers. Mr. Conjar did not have a concern with this, as we still have sufficient back-
up parts for our lights. Mr. Heefner’s only question was whether the light at Front &
Locust Sts. as new or old components in it.
Marshall Hoyt - letter of complaint about high minimum sewer bill. Mr. Brown was
instructed to draft a response letter.
DeLois West (for Jane Mims) - letter requesting adjustment on sewer bill due to a
medical emergency. Mr. Brown was instructed to draft a response letter.
NEW BUSINESS:
Bill Saylor, 509 S. Front St. – Request for relief of sewer charges for the third quarter of
2010 due to a leak in the basement of the property that was not reported by the tenant.
The reason he is requesting sewer relief is because the water seeped into the ground, not
into the sewage treatment plant. Mr. Saylor provided the staff with a spreadsheet
detailing his concerns. Mr. Brown will work on this matter with the staff at the
distribution department and the staff in the office to resolve this issue.
Chris Bauer, HRG – Presented a proposal for Front St Phase II Improvements. Federal
funding is available in the amount of $1.3 million. The Front St. Streetscape is a prime
candidate for this money; this would include Front St. from Pine St. to Lincoln St. in
Phase One and Front St. to Elm St. in Phase Two and provide for crosswalks, curbing,
trees, etc. The driveway improvements for the fire station would also be included;
possibly incorporating placing the Borough of Steelton emblem into the pavement. Mr.
Bauer reminded us that the federal government requires environmental clearance, which
would be carried over from year to year. The primary focus is on Phase One of the
project area.
Mr. Heefner questioned whether any more bump-outs would be put into place; he does
not want more bump-outs. He also wanted to make sure that street lights going up
Adams St. to Second St. were included. Another area of concern was the
-2-
Steelton Borough
Council Meeting
June 6, 2011
secondary entrance at Trewick St. which is not presently listed as part of any plan; all
traffic should not be directed through Locust St.
Mr. Shaver added that any alterations to Front and Locust Sts. would have to go through
the Penn DOT scoping process. There was obviously a design flaw with the ballards at
Front and Locust Sts. – at least four of them have been taken out by trucks. Mr. Heefner
stated that this money cannot be used for existing projects, but could possibly be used to
take trees out and put new parking meters in. Mr. Bauer indicated that there is some
flexibility, but we should finish Phase I and go as far as we can on Phase II. The Mayor
suggested working on at least Pine St. to Lincoln St.
Ms. Marcinko asked whether we would save money by not installing any more bump-
outs; Mr. Bauer said we would not. The Mayor stated that he thinks the bricks on the
crosswalks were a bad idea. Mr. Shaver asked if we were considering a brick/concrete
combo or all of one material or the other. Mr. Heefner indicated that the pricing is almost
the same either way.
Dr. Szada questioned where the $1.3 million was at this time – was it already allocated,
or could it be allocated, or is it just a suggestion? Mr. Bauer explained that the excess
federal funds were part of another project. The municipality in question could not
produce the matching funds needed and other municipalities were approached. The
money is already available. Dr. Szada then asked if we could alter the Phase II Project or
complement the Adams Street Project. Mr. Bauer indicated that these funds are for State
Road Projects (Adams St. is not a state road). The funds were set aside for enhancement,
streetscape, etc. Mr. Shaver added that it is a continuation of the Main Street Program.
Dr. Szada questioned why we would improve the sidewalks and other areas before we
remove and replace the older buildings that exist.
Doug Brown – Discussed pursuing private funding to provide interim match to federal
transportation monies such as a bridge loan. The borough would be required to provide
up to $300,000 or a 20% match to Federal Transportation dollars. Mr. Musser noted that
we should take advantage of the opportunity to leverage $1.3 million because this money
may not be here for a long time after this is allocated.
A motion was made by Mr. Heefner to move forward with the application for $1.3
million, seconded by Mr. Albert and approved with one dissenting vote – Dr. Szada.
A motion was made by Mr. Albert to apply for a bridge loan of $300, 000 for matching
funds, seconded by Mr. Heefner and approved with one dissenting vote – Dr. Szada.
Mr. Wion verified that the HRG Front St. Phase II Design Proposal is appropriate as far
as the legal applications are concerned. Mr. Spencer indicated that the HATS Meeting is
a key meeting. Mr. Wion said all is contingent upon funding. A motion was made by
-3-
Steelton Borough
Council Meeting
June 6, 2011
Mr. Heefner to approve the HRG proposal contingent on financing, seconded by Mr.
Albert and approved by all present.
Matt Cichy, HRG – Presented change order #1 in the amount of $3,275 for excavation
and additional drains on Adams St. under the retaining wall at the site. There was some
discussion about runoff water dissipating into the ground from downspouts and the fact
that the geotechnical engineer may not have adhered to conservation district guidelines.
There was also some concern that the engineers may not have gone deep enough when
they dug to verify soil form samples, and if there is an issue with the water design will
the water be taken away properly.
Mr. Shaver asked that Mr. Brown follow-up with HRG on the water issue.
A motion was made by Mr. Shaver to approve change order #1 in the amount of $3,275,
seconded by Mr. Heefner and approved by all present. Mr. Heefner asked that HRG
watch the money being spent, as it’s getting low. Mr. Cichy stated that there is
approximately $18,000 in contingency funds.
Matt Cichy, HRG – requesting application for payment #1 to Rogele related to the
Adams St. Project in the amount of $93,133.29.
A motion was made by Mr. Shaver to approve payment #1, seconded by Mr. Albert and
approved by all present.
Matt Cichy, HRG – requesting a proposal for H2O Grant administration assistance from
the McCullough Consulting Group, not to exceed $2,800. HRG will assist Mr. Brown
with paperwork and administrative tasks on a time/materials basis.
A motion was made by Mr. Shaver to direct Mr. Brown to prepare a purchase order in the
amount not to exceed $2,800, and for the president to sign the proposal, seconded by Mr.
Albert and approved by all present. Mr. Shaver thanked HRG for making the order
specify “not to exceed contract”.
Jeff Wright – presented a proposal for Zelenkofske Axelrod LLC to conduct the Adams
St. Grant Program Audit.
A motion was made by Mr. Albert to approve the proposal contingent upon receipt of an
appropriate contract, seconded by Mr. Heefner and approved by all present.
AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION:
-4-
Steelton Borough
Council Meeting
June 6, 2011
Valerie Duhig, 11 S. 3rd St. – her neighbor excavated under his house and then left
things undone and her pipes froze; now she has a huge bill. She is asking for sewer
bill relief; her bill is now $3,788.93. Mr. Wright stated that Mr. Brown, Mr.
Heefner and Mr. Conjar will make a proposal and get back to her with information.
COUNCIL’S CONCERNS:
Dr. Szada – Has concerns about the Felton Lofts project: what # and type of units and
income levels are involved in the project; will we be getting what we voted on? The
income level ranges mentioned by the media did not sound correct. The Mayor indicated
that they were not reported correctly. Mr. Wright asked Mr. Brown to get this
information for Dr. Szada. Mr. Musser also clarified several issues involving the number
of units, how many of these units are handicapped accessible and amounts of PFHA
funding/ranges. Mr. Musser reminded Council that they approved the current makeup of
the Lofts.
Ms. Marcinko – Verbatim: {Never in my life have I seen the letter “I” in the word
“Team”. This morning while reading a facebook post by another Councilman, I was
appalled by the words I read. Since the start of the East End sewer separation project, I
have voiced my concerns both publicly in these meetings and directly to Mr. Heefner, the
Chair of Public Works about the problems resulting from this project. Some of the
responses from Mr. Heefner to me were “There is always pain with a project like this”
and “you are just complaining because it is your street”. I am a taxpayer and a voter too
and to read that now at this late date near the end of this project, Councilman Heefner
spent the day in my neighborhood listening to complaints about the project is intriguing.
What is even more intriguing is your comment, Mr. Heefner, that you already told them
they are not getting paid unless I am happy and I am not happy. You need to be
reminded that you need six (6) other “I”s that are happy. Also, as a constituent resident
of the East End and not a Councilwoman, I cannot help to think this has everything to do
with the upcoming election and NOT the real problems of the project that have been
reported and addressed consistently for the last year!! Facebook has a large audience and
your words sounded as if you are the only Councilman addressing these issues and this is
just not true!!}
Mayor Acri – During the recent storms, the auto alarm went off for 3rd & Pine Sts. The
Presbyterian Church had a pipe break in the basement. The guys from the fire
department helped considerably in the cleanup.
Mr. Musser – Reminded everyone that the $1.3 million is there, but it might not be
around in the future. Dr. Szada asked if the government could recoup the money; Mr.
Musser said only if the funds aren’t used. He also stated that gaming money is not
-5-
Steelton Borough
Council Meeting
June 6, 2011
federal or state. Ten million dollars a year are given to Dauphin County; East Hanover
Township automatically gets a percentage and the rest is divided among other areas.
Mr. Shaver – Asked if the letter was ever sent to Penn DOT about Pine St.; Mr. Brown
said that he has taken care of it.
Mr. Wright – Thanked everyone for coming. He reminded Council that summer months
are “dress down” months for members.
On motion by Mr. Shaver, seconded by Mr. Albert, the Council meeting recessed
into executive session at 7:39p.m.to discuss personnel matters. The Council meeting
reconvened at 7:57p.m. with a motion by Mr. Albert, seconded by Dr. Szada.
A motion was made by Mr. Shaver to approve the engagement of special counsel for the
Harrisburg sewer rate issue at $275 per hour, seconded by Mr. Albert and approved by
all.
A discussion was held by members about the East End Sewer Separation Project and
problems related to parking, paving and other issues. Residents have concerns about the
subcontractor closing too many streets at one time, leaving them stuck on the hill. (It was
noted that they are from Allentown and therefore did not realize how few routes there are
off the hill.) It was also stated that the subcontractor was using residents’ water. (Mr.
Sam Ortenzio told Ms. Marcinko that he did give his permission for them to use his
hose.)
It was concluded that there needs to be more communication among HRG, contractors,
Mr. Conjar, Mr. Heefner, the Public Works Committee and Council. Members need to
be kept aware of these situations as they arise.
A meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, June 7, 2011 to check on the progress and
performance of the paving subcontractor. (Mr. Brown was asked to pull the Performance
Bond out of the files for this meeting.)
Dr. Szada reminded Council members that they must be aware of their tone, language,
etc. during public parts of meetings. The general consensus was that there was an
oversight tonight, and that hopefully this wouldn’t happen again.
Ms. Marcinko is concerned that the Foundation is spending money, but has no money
coming in. They would like to meet with Council to discuss the possibility of
giving the building at 1 N. Front St. back to the Borough. They have approximately
$13,000 left; this would have to be given to other charitable organizations – Mr. Brown
reminded all that an audit would have to be performed and around half of that money
would then be used to pay the auditors. Ms. Marcinko stated that the Foundation needs
-6-
Steelton Borough
Council Meeting
June 6, 2011
some direction/a purpose for their existence. One option for the building would be for
the Foundation to lease it to Castaway Critters, who has shown interest in doing so.
Finally, Mr. Shaver expressed the desire for the Borough to get the process started to sell
off some of its real estate. Mr. Wion suggested that Mr. Brown get together a list of
properties to be sold and ideas of what we would like to be in their place. Bid
specifications have to be advertised for each property.
Also, everyone agreed that the Borough should move forward with the sale of the former
liquor store and that something needs to be done with the property beside the Locust St.
steps (McCaleb property).
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no other business before Council, on a motion by Mr. Shaver,
seconded by Dr. Szada, the meeting adjourned at 8:19p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
______________________________ ______________________________
Douglas E. Brown Kathy I. Sosnowski
Borough Manager Executive Assistant
-7-
Get email alerts for Steelton
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.