City Council
Regular MeetingSterling Heights, MI · August 18, 2020
Minutes
CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 18, 2020
IN COMMUNITY CENTER
1. Mayor Taylor called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. Mayor Taylor led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and Melanie D. Ryska, City
Clerk, gave the Invocation.
3. Council Members present at roll call: Deanna Koski, Michael V. Radtke Jr., Maria
G. Schmidt, Liz Sierawski, Michael C. Taylor, Henry Yanez, Barbara A. Ziarko.
Also Present: Mark Vanderpool, City Manager; Marc D. Kaszubski, City Attorney;
Melanie D. Ryska, City Clerk; Carol Sobosky, Recording Secretary.
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Moved by Koski, seconded by Ziarko, RESOLVED, to approve the agenda with
the addition of the swearing in of a new Sterling Heights Police Officer (Item
6A).
Yes: All. The motion carried.
5. REPORT FROM CITY MANAGER
Mr. Vanderpool provided an update on the Microenterprise Assistance Grant
Program to small businesses. They have been working on the program that is
now being rolled out. He explained the program provides grants rather than
loans to small businesses with five employees or less, and they can be used to
assist with the payment of a business’ preparation, prevention, and responses
to the coronavirus. He outlined some of the activities for which the funds can
be used, which includes purchasing materials or equipment needed to adapt
business spaces and activities to comply with CDC guidelines, as well as
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 2
revenue shortfalls in the areas that affect rent, mortgage payments, and utility
bills. He advised that to be eligible for this program, the applicants must have a
Dunn and Bradstreet number (DUNS) and they must be registered in the
federal System for Award Management (SAMS). He explained that those
businesses who need assistance with their SAMS registration can attend a free
webinar on September 8 from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m., adding that webinar will help
businesses that do not have a DUNS or SAMS number to get them. He noted
they strongly encourage businesses to participate in the webinar because it
will streamline the application process. Those businesses that already have
those numbers can begin submitting their applications on September 1. He
informed that the maximum award for the Micro Grants is $5,000, although it
could be less, depending upon the circumstances, but they are strongly urging
small businesses to apply for the grant. For more information, he
recommended they visit www.sterling-heights.net/microgrant and they will be
able to get all of the information they need, as well as links to the webinar or
application, adding it has the deadlines listed as well. He concluded his report
by stating they look forward to dispersing this much-needed funding for small
businesses.
6. PRESENTATIONS
A. Mayor Taylor stated this has been added to their agenda this evening
and is a swearing in of a new Sterling Heights Police Officer, and he invited
Police Chief Dale Dwojakowski to make the presentation and swear in the new
officer.
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 3
Police Chief Dale Dwojakowski explained they were starting the process of
hiring the new officer in February, but with Covid-19 lockdown, they had to
wait a few months. He introduced Officer Adelajda (“Addy”) Shehu, who
graduated from Henry Ford II High School in Sterling Heights. She moved here
from Albania when she was five years old, speaks Albanian, and just completed
a year of police work in the City of Hamtramck. He stated she has always
considered being a police officer in the City of Sterling Heights her dream job,
which speaks highly of Sterling Heights.
Chief Dwojakowski swore in Officer Adelajda Shehu.
Officer Shehu thanked the Chief and City Council for giving her this
opportunity and making her dream come true. She thanked her family for their
support, and she is looking forward to getting to work in the City.
Chief Dwojakowski thanked Council for their continued support in funding.
Mayor Pro-Tem Sierawski recalled when Officer Shehu was serving at Dodge
Park Coney Island, a restaurant they loved to frequent. She congratulated her
and was confident she will make an excellent addition to their law enforcement
team.
Mayor Taylor welcomed Officer Shehu to the City on behalf of the entire City
Council and the 135,000+ residents of the City. He thanked her for her service,
and acknowledged that, although this is a difficult time for police officers, the
officers in this City have always maintained the highest level of professionalism
and always answer the call. He wished her well in her new position.
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 4
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Mayor Taylor stated this is to consider the application by Aperam
Stainless Services & Solutions, USA, LLC for an Industrial Facilities Tax
Exemption Certificate (IFEC) at 7077 18-1/2 Mile Road. He invited Senior
Economic Development Advisor Luke Bonner to give a presentation.
Senior Economic Development Advisor Luke Bonner explained that Aperam
Stainless Services is applying for this Industrial Facilities Exemption Certificate
for a new 100,000-square-foot facility at 18-1/2 Mile Road. The investment is
slightly over $9 million in real property and $1.8 million in personal property.
They have been in the community for about 18 years, previously known as
ArcelorMittal, He noted the vacancy they will be creating on Center Drive will
allow for another Sterling Heights company to grow into that building, or a
company not currently in Sterling Heights to move there. They also have a
building on Mound Road, located in front of the new Amazon Distribution
Center. It is a 30-foot-high crane facility, and he assured both of those facilities
are in high demand, so he does not anticipate they will remain vacant for long.
Mr. Bonner stated that, based on their investment of $9 million dollars, the
relocating of the thirty-five jobs currently at Center Drive, the addition of five
new jobs, plus the high technology activity credit of one year, they are
recommending a ten-year tax term. With the new jobs created and the
economic multiplier of four, they anticipate another indirect twenty jobs
created and another $900,000 of economic impact in the community. They
anticipate there will be new revenue in the amount of $367,000 of new city
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 5
taxes generated over the ten-year period of time, and $739,000 of new school
taxes generated. He invited Mr. Randy Kehl, Vice-President of Aperam
Stainless, to talk more about the company and what they can expect in the
future.
Mr. Randy Kehl, Vice-President of Finance for Aperam Stainless, thanked
Council for their consideration. He explained their company is part of a global
manufacturer of stainless steel with producing mills in Europe and South
America, headquartered in France. They have three sales agencies in North
America and a processing and warehousing facility in Sterling Heights, known
as the service center, where they process and sell stainless slick oils and sheets,
primarily for the automotive and appliance markets throughout the United
States, Canada and Mexico. They moved from Troy to Sterling Heights in 2002.
They have been planning their move to 18-1/2 Mile for three years, and look
forward to their continued growth here, which will include new hires in Sterling
Heights. Mr. Kehl understood there are some questions about the buildings
they are going to vacate, noting they currently lease two facilities, one on
Mound Road which is listed. They expect that building to be subleased
immediately due to the strong interest in that property. Their main plant is on
Center Drive, and that lease runs through December 2022; however, they have
a sublease provision and they intend to do that as they coordinate their move
to their new facility. Their realtors feel it is more likely that they will find
tenants who will sign long-term deals, allowing them to vacate their lease
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 6
immediately when that occurs. He informed that their new building is
anticipated to be ready for occupancy in September 2020. He thanked the City
of Sterling Heights and their employees for being great over the last eighteen
years, and they look forward to many more years in this City as a business
resident. He offered to answer questions.
Mayor Taylor opened the floor for comments from the public, but no one
spoke. Mayor Taylor closed the public hearing.
Moved by Ziarko, seconded by Schmidt, RESOLVED, to adopt the resolution
approving the application by Aperam Stainless Services & Solutions, USA, LLC,
for an Industrial Facilities Tax Exemption Certificate at 7077 18-1/2 Mile Road,
Parcel #50-10-10-09-200-053, for a period of 10 years in accordance with the
guidelines established by City Council, and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby
authorized to sign, as applicable, all documents required in conjunction with
this approval.
Councilwoman Ziarko stated she has no questions, but commented she is not
concerned about vacancies in this area. She agreed with their realtors that the
buildings will possibly be filled before they have to sublease. She is
appreciative, in reading the application and general information provided, that
their products are sustainable and will help in the next level of the
environment. She thanked them for finding another location in Sterling
Heights, and she wished them well in their success.
Yes: All. The motion carried.
8. ORDINANCE INTRODUCTIONS
A. Mayor Taylor stated this is to consider the introduction of an ordinance
amending Chapter 2 of the City Code of Ordinances to create the Diversity and
Inclusion Commission. He invited Assistant City Attorney Donald DeNault.
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 7
Assistant City Attorney Donald DeNault stated this is the ordinance that was
presented two meetings ago, at which time it was postponed. It is still up for
introduction. He recapped the ordinance, which modifies the current Ethnic
Community Committee, change its status to that of a Commission and change
its mission to that of Diversity and Inclusion Commission. He noted that
Community Relations Director Melanie Davis is also present tonight, and they
are here to answer questions.
Mayor Taylor opened the floor for comments and questions from the audience.
• Mr. Charles Jefferson – questioned what is being diversified and
included, and where this will take place.
• Ms. Jackie Ryan – voiced opposition; already have an Ethnic
Committee; it is constitutionally sound; concerned this could cause
division; questioned the influence given over all other Boards and
Commissions; why is it not subject to the Open Meetings Act; type
of training; requested definition of diversity.
• Ms. Sanaa Elias – questioned the constitutionality of this ordinance;
opposed to elimination of Ethnic Community Committee; felt this is
identity politics and will divide the City; opposed to it being an
ordinance, which makes it law; concerned it is not under Open
Meetings Act.
• Ms. Jazmine Early – opposed to changing the Ethnic Community
Committee; claimed the City wants to change the Committee to a
Commission is not why the Committee was created; claimed she has
been excluded from being appointed; urged the Council to not
change the name of the current committee.
Mayor Taylor explained this postponed to tonight’s meeting from the July 22
regular City Council meeting. They have a motion on the floor, motioned by
Councilman Radtke, supported by himself, to introduce the ordinance to create
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 8
a Diversity and Inclusion Commission. He indicated the deliberations continue,
and he opened the floor to the Council members.
Councilman Yanez stated he is not sure what he wants to do, noting the
speakers’ comments this evening are telling because this ordinance does not
make it clear as to what this Commission is going to do. He realized it is the
first step and amendments can be made, but he felt they need more clarity.
There were a few council members at the last meeting who made it clear they
prefer to keep the Ethnic Community Committee as it is. He does not want to
vote against inclusion and diversity, and although he felt a lot of the concerns
expressed this evening are unfounded, he cannot push back because he does
not know what this Commission will do, other than advise City Council on
diversity and inclusion. He stated he does not want to vote no on this at this
time, but he added he cannot vote yes on this as it stands.
Councilwoman Ziarko noted she has questions on this commission. She felt
the Ethnic Committee should become a commission, but she does not know
whether she is in favor of having the Diversity and Inclusion Commission
become a part of the Ethnic Community Committee. She referred to a video of
the African American Coalition meeting, and the moderator stressed there is a
difference between ethnic diversity and racial diversity, so she felt it may not
make sense to put everyone together, although she suggested there may be a
liaison that would serve on both. She felt they need to do more research and
recalled Mr. DeNault’s comment from the last meeting that there are very few
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 9
comparables of other communities that have done this because it has not been
done locally. She agreed with Councilman Yanez that there is a lot of work that
needs to be done, and she could not see how they can vote on this tonight.
Councilwoman Schmidt stated she would like to see the two committees
remain separate with two different missions, although they do not yet know
the true mission of this new Commission. The selection process or the criteria
for how long they will be picked for this new group is not clear. She felt there
are too many unknowns, and she favored a committee rather than a
commission, noting that all committees are advisory to City Council, but when
it is a Commission, that is a step above. Councilwoman Schmidt felt they need
to understand the full spectrum of the ordinance, and she cannot vote in favor
of this because they do not have the information.
Councilwoman Koski stated she would like to see the Ethnic Committee turned
into a Commission and be kept separate. In regard to a commission addressing
diversity, she felt they need to do more research. At this point, she noted there
is not a mission statement or any explanation as to its purpose and issues. She
suggested more research be done before that is established and possibly be
reviewed at the Strategic Planning Meeting in January 2021. She received an
email from the American Management Association’s Woman’s Leadership
seminar, and it has to do with diversity and inclusion. She suggested that each
Council member participate in this free webinar, noting it may give them some
insight as to what they are trying to do, as well as suggestions on how to do it
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 10
right. She added it talks about “How to be an Ally”, and the definition of what
an ally does. She stated she would like Council to do research so they know
what they want to create.
Mayor Pro-Tem Sierawski felt this has been a well-debated issue, and she
pointed out this room was filled four weeks ago, with many residents speaking
in favor of diversity and inclusion. She stressed she is always in favor of
inclusion and diversity but she agreed with her colleagues that she would like
to see this separate from the current Ethnic Community Committee, which has
a wonderful mission and have succeeded very well in what they have been
asked and tasked to do. They bring the community together, which is also
something they want to see with the Diversion and Inclusion Commission;
however, she pointed out they do not have guidelines, they do not know who
will be on it, how they pick and choose so as not to exclude anyone. She felt
the list of items are very “touchy”, and she does not want to start something
based on a “knee-jerk” reaction to what is currently going on in the country.
She stressed they need to think this through, deliberate and get good
direction, so that this time, she is not in favor of replacing the Ethnic
Community Committee, and although she is in favor of Diversity and Inclusion,
she cannot support it the way it has been presented to them tonight.
Councilman Radtke referred to some citizens’ concerns about the
constitutionality of this Commission, and he requested Mr. DeNault address the
issue.
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 11
Mr. DeNault assured it is constitutional, being an ordinance creating an
advisory committee about how to diversify, include people and make them feel
included in the community. He noted in answer to their question as to
whether it could become an issue where it is not handled properly or becomes
divided, that could happen with any group; however Council oversees,
controls, and appoints good people to be part of that process.
Councilman Radtke requested that Mr. DeNault address the concern that this
Commission would not fall under the regulations of the Open Meetings Act.
Mr. DeNault understood the public’s first concern is that they are excluded and
people cannot participate. He admitted in part, that can sometimes be true,
but when the have committees and groups of citizens appointed to work
together on projects, tasks, and give advice to the Council and community,
they sometimes need space to do that without being subject to rigid rules and
procedures or rigid public participation requirements. They try to find a
balance when recommending this type of ordinance, and he clarified as long as
they have some public input, they can certainly mandate more and ask for
more. The balance they recommended was for them to have public input four
times a year. He replied to further inquiry that those would be open meetings
where the public would have input.
Councilman Radtke expressed disappointment to hear the commentary on
this, because he does not feel it is controversial. He noted the current Ethnic
Advisory Committee already hosts a ceremony where they present Diversity
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 12
awards. He expressed concern that they would have two separate but equal
committees that would be doing the same thing, and he does not feel that is
good public policy. He equated this to arguing about a name change. He
recalled when they set up a Youth Advisory Commission, there did not seem to
be this much concern about their mission and their statement. He felt the
Diversity and Inclusion Commission will have the ability to create their own
mission statement and bylaws. He reminded that the Youth Advisory
Committee created their own subcommittees and idea groups. He
commented that the Ethnic Advisory Committee has been great for the City,
and he would recommend that it be made a permanent subcommittee of the
Diversity and Inclusion Commission so they can continue doing all of the
wonderful things they have been doing. He mentioned other communities
that have similar commissions. He felt it should be the Diversity, Equity, and
Inclusion Commission. He questioned why sustainability should be a
commission, but yet diversity should be a committee. He felt they need to do
things differently than they did in the 1990’s, when the Ethnic Advisory
Committee was formed.
Mayor Taylor questioned the difference between a committee and a
commission.
Mr. Kaszubski explained that a committee is formed by a resolution of Council,
and there are various directives formed within that resolution. In this case, the
Ethnic Committee created their own bylaws, started their mission, and
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 13
expanded it. A commission is part of the ordinances and do not come and go
like committees. Committees sometimes form and end, whereas commissions
are in the ordinance books and they continue on. Commission members are
sometimes paid, although in this case, they are not; however, that is spelled out
in the ordinance.
Mayor Taylor does not see a lot of distinction between a committee and a
commission and does not understand why a committee versus a commission is
a relevant part of this discussion. He agreed with his colleagues that the Ethnic
Committee does a good job in celebrating the various ethnicities they have in
the City of Sterling Heights, which is one of the more diverse communities in
the State of Michigan. He agreed that is something they should recognize and
actively promote, and he did not feel his colleagues feel differently on that
point. He felt the question is whether there is going to be an overlap if they
have an Ethnic Advisory Committee and a Diversity and Inclusion Commission.
He questioned whether they are going to take things away from the current
committee in order to roll it into a Diversity and Inclusion Commission, adding
he does not see where it is a major issue if they have one larger Commission
that is able to do both. He stated he does not know if the Council will find
common ground on that, and he does not want to see the very important
mission of both groups get spoiled because they cannot agree. He heard
discussion tonight about the lack of a mission statement, but he pointed out
City Council can talk about that tonight. He felt that, in light of what is going
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 14
on in the world, it is important that they are doing everything they can to
promote racial equality and racial justice, to be a more welcoming place to all,
and to have a commission that can help them point out their blind spots. He
stressed it is not about putting one race or ethnicity above others, but it is
about recognizing that City Council may not have all of the answers, and the
lived experiences of the Council members may be different than the lived
experiences of the members of the community. He pointed out the
Commission is a way of giving a voice to residents who have all different lived
experiences so they can talk to Council about it. He stated he was not able to
attend the African American Coalition but the feedback he heard was that the
attendees appreciated being in a group where they could see “a bunch of
other people like me”, and they do not necessarily get that experience when
they are in their neighborhood. It is a safe environment to provide the
feedback that Council needs. He felt the mission statement of the Diversity and
Inclusion Commission is obvious, and he stated he does not care if Council
chooses to keep the Ethnic Community Committee separate, but he felt the
adoption of this ordinance and the formation of this Commission should not be
something they put off until January or February because the need is there
now. He commented that he would be willing to put it off another thirty days,
but he stressed they need to give the attorneys direction as to what they want.
He recommended that they bring this back soon, possibly in two weeks, and he
felt they have consensus that they want the Ethnic Committee to stay separate.
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 15
He suggested they could vote yes on this tonight, bring it back in two weeks
with a separate Commission but with clear roles about how this Commission
will move forward. They can create a mission statement based on tonight’s
feedback, and they can set the rules tonight about what they are and are not
going to do. He cautioned that they could develop very rigid rules but felt that
would better be left for people who are appointed to give them that feedback.
He stated he will be voting yes, and he would like Administration to come back
with an ordinance that is more tailored to the feedback they receive from City
Council.
Mayor Pro-Tem Sierawski felt it might help if the second committee has a
different title. She acknowledged that “diversity” and “inclusion” are currently
buzz words and it is difficult to know exactly what they mean, so she suggested
changing the name of the committee to the Equality and Justice Committee,
which she felt will define their role differently, because it is not specific to race,
ethnicity or gender identity.
Councilman Yanez appreciated the Mayor’s comments, but he expressed
concern that they would move forward tonight while asking the attorneys to
do a complete rewrite on the legislation. He felt with the two-step process, it
may be a difficult path to follow for everyone to know what they are doing. He
did not believe they will want to vote in two weeks on a piece of legislation
that is showing up for the first time. He felt more thought needs to go into this,
and he appreciated the fact that the people who are asked to sit on this
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 16
Commission would guide it, but he stressed they need a starting point. He
agreed with Mayor Taylor that this Commission is not only about race and
ethnicities, but it is about a number of things. He would prefer to give the City
guidance as to what they want and have them come back at a later date with
something more complete in thought, although he assured Mr. DeNault that
the legislation is very detailed. He has no problem with the words “diversity”,
“inclusion”, “equality”, or “justice”, so it does not matter to him what the
commission is called, but he felt it is important that every Sterling Heights
resident be treated fairly and have the “real Sterling Heights experience”. He
mentioned he attended the African American Coalition and many of them were
amazed as they looked around the room to see so many people who looked
like them. He commented that these people are living as an island in the City,
possibly not taking advantage of the full Sterling Heights experience. He
stated he would not like to vote on this motion tonight because he felt there is
a better way and it will take a little more time. He added he is willing to discuss
those options.
Mayor Taylor raised the question that if they vote yes, it may not provide time
for the changes and they will be back in two weeks with possibly a total
rewrite. He questioned whether it would be feasible, if this is voted down, that
he could request, without objection or without a vote, for Administration to
bring a renewed Diversity/Inclusion/Equality/Justice commission to Council
within forty-five days.
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 17
Mr. Kaszubski replied one option that might work would be for this to be
postponed indefinitely and Council could provide direction to come back in
forty-five days. The other option is they can have the vote, and if it is voted
down, a Council member can request this be brought back in a different form.
Councilman Yanez suggested that Mayor Taylor withdraw his second to the
motion on the floor, the motion would die for lack of support, and they would
as City Administration to bring something else forward.
Mayor Taylor stated he supports this, and added that if there was a motion to
postpone indefinitely, he would vote in favor with the express caveat that he
wants to be able to provide Administration with direction to take the feedback
they have received and craft an ordinance that incorporates that feedback.
Councilwoman Ziarko stated if she is asked to vote on the motion currently on
the floor, she would be voting no. She agreed with Councilman Yanez and is
not comfortable with the way it is written. She felt they have not given
Administration enough direction on what they could bring back, and to think
they can spend fifteen minutes tonight and come up with things they want
included for this ordinance is unfair. She felt Mayor Pro-Tem Sierawski brought
up a good point that it could possibly be titled by another name, and she had a
conversation with Councilwoman Koski yesterday, who had a good idea for the
name of it. She is not opposed to the mission itself but would be voting no on
the way it is currently presented.
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 18
Councilwoman Koski agreed with Mayor Pro-Tem Sierawski’s suggestion to
change the name and added that she likes the name “Human Community
Relations”. She noted that the City of Livonia has a Human Relations
Commission, and Lansing has Human Relations and Community Services
Advisory Board. She indicated she had given some information to Mayor Taylor
that includes what could be a mission statement for this type of committee.
She stated she is going to listen to the webinar, but it is about people speaking
who feel they are discriminated against, which is one of the issues, and it talks
about overcoming it and helping them work through it to become an inclusive
community. She recommended withdrawing the motion or voting it down,
and then provide Administration with a request to create a new committee
with a different name, listen to the webinar and provide a mission statement
and different ideas from the information they gather.
Councilwoman Schmidt agreed with Councilwoman Koski that the cleanest
way to handle this tonight is to vote this down and give direction to bring
forward a new committee. She is glad they agree to disagree or agree that the
Ethnic Committee should be separate. Councilman Radtke had cited the
example of Eastpointe, which has a Human Rights Commission. She felt
human rights is totally different from ethnic diversity so she believed the two
groups should be separate. She commented that each of them coming up with
criteria tonight is unfair to all of them, and they need to think of the criteria
they want these residents to meet who will serve on this commission because
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 19
they have to think about what they are there to accomplish, which cannot be
figured out in fifteen minutes tonight. She would like to see this voted down
and start fresh, and she has no objection to the names suggested by Mayor
Pro-Tem Sierawski or Councilwoman Koski, but she stated she will not be in
support of the motion on the floor as it stands.
Councilman Radtke inquired as to whether City Council could appoint a
subcommittee to work with the City Manager to craft a better ordinance.
Mr. Kaszubski stated he has not seen this occur since he has been here, so he
indicated he would have to look at it and get back to Council.
Councilman Radtke pointed out that during Strategic Planning, they meet in
small groups with the City Manager to talk about the future of the City. He
suggested that possibly they could ask that the City Manager have meetings
with members of City Council. He admitted he is torn, noting they have had
this in front of them for forty-five days and can still not specifically say what
they would like. He felt that is part of the homework they all have, and he
stated he refuses to withdraw his motion. He suggested if the motion does not
pass and they ask for something to be brought back, that they request the City
Manager meet with Council members in small groups to come up with a new
ordinance.
Mayor Taylor questioned how much time Mr. Vanderpool anticipates he would
need to come back with a new ordinance.
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 20
Mr. Vanderpool replied the feedback has been helpful and thoughtful this
evening. He felt the first meeting in October, which is slightly less than forty-
five days, would give them the time they need and provide them an
opportunity to collaborate with City Council, which he felt is a good idea to
make sure they get it right when they bring it back. He felt that is a reasonable
compromise in terms of timing.
Mayor Taylor felt it is incumbent upon each Council member to reach out and
provide feedback. He clarified he did not mean to insinuate that they could get
this done in fifteen minutes this evening, but they have already spent a
considerable amount of time in discussion. He is hearing complaints that it
does not include what they want, but he is not hearing specifics of what they
want in it, which is the purpose of deliberation and why they are here. He
appreciated the information Councilwoman Koski presented to him about the
webinar, “How to be an Ally,” but he did not know if that is an overlap to what
they are trying to do. Feedback needs to be given to City Administration;
otherwise, this could come back in forty-five days and it will “miss the mark” as
well. He maintained that he would like to talk about it tonight, adding he does
not care how long it takes, but he hoped that is what they would be able to
accomplish tonight. He stated he is going to vote yes because of the reasons
cited, and he acknowledged his colleagues will each be voting on this motion
and he respects the reasons they have each given. He stated that, without
objection from his colleagues if this motion fails, he would like the City
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 21
Administration to bring back a renewed ordinance, with the purpose of
promoting equality, justice, inclusion, etc. before City Council at their first
meeting in October.
Councilwoman Ziarko replied to inquiry that she does not object to that
request. She indicated she would like to comment.
Councilman Radtke called the question.
Mr. Kaszubski replied to inquiry that they do not have to vote on the call to
question and then vote on the motion, but rather it is all one vote on the
motion.
Mayor Taylor explained that calling the question takes precedence, and a roll
call vote was taken on the motion on the floor, which is to introduce the
ordinance as written.
Roll Call Vote:
Yes: Taylor, Radtke.
No: Schmidt, Sierawski, Yanez, Ziarko, Koski.
The motion failed for lack of votes.
Mayor Taylor stated he heard no objection to his request for City
Administration to bring back a renewed ordinance for consideration at the first
meeting in October, so he believed City Administration has direction with the
feedback they received.
9. ORDINANCE ADOPTIONS
A. Mayor Taylor stated this is to consider the adoption of an ordinance
amending Chapter 2 of the City Code of Ordinances to modify the prohibition
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 22
on planning commissioners serving on City boards and commissions. He
opened the floor for public comments and questions.
• Ms. Jackie Ryan – inquired about the reason for the change; there
are a lot of people to pick from in the City; concerned that some
people are being excluded; claimed she is representing a lot of
people who cannot be present because of Covid and it is also during
the summer months.
• Ms. Sanaa Elias – concerned this is being done so they can select
certain people; questioned whether there is a lack of volunteers.
• Ms. Jazmine Early – questioned why this is necessary; seven
individuals are serving on multiple commissions/committees, while
others are not appointed; the more volunteers they appoint, the
better the City will be.
Moved by Radtke, seconded by Taylor, RESOLVED, to amend the ordinance
amending Chapter 2 of the City Code of Ordinances to modify the prohibition
on planning commissioners serving on City boards and commissions.
Councilman Radtke stated the State legislature changed their law, and the City
is following their lead. He is aware they have had some interest from some of
their Planning Commissioners for serving on some of these committees and
they are currently prohibited from doing so, and hopefully this will change..
Councilwoman Ziarko stated she heard from citizen comments this evening
that the Council members “put friends on these commissions and then
influence them”. She informed that by their Council guidelines, once someone
is on a commission, they cannot influence them to make a decision, and it is
completely out of their hands. She assured the commission/committee
members do not communicate with the Council members even as to what is
on their agenda, so she wanted to clarify what she felt is a false statement.
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 23
Mayor Taylor stated he would prefer to see a more inclusive list rather than
limiting it to just these nine commissions/committees. He questioned as to
whether there is a legal reason why a planning commissioner would be
prohibited by a Michigan law from serving on another board, other than
Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA).
Mr. Kaszubski replied there is not a legal reason for every board, although there
are some boards that have certain requirements in order to serve on them,
such as residence in a certain area, etc. He indicated it is not a legal reason as
much as it is the fact that Planning Commission is a quasi-judicial board and
they felt it was necessary not to have planning commissioners sitting on other
boards that may be dealing with the same issues or same parcels of property
due to conflicts that could arise.
Mayor Taylor felt it is a blend of a legal and policy issue. He is in favor of this as
written. He questioned whether they have to exclude ZBA from this, noting
that by law they can have one liaison that serves on both Planning Commission
and ZBA.
Mr. Kaszubski confirmed they can have only one liaison per state statute.
Mayor Taylor felt it could be decided on a case-by-case basis for all
commissions except for the ZBA. He indicated if anyone would be willing to
make the motion to amend the motion on the floor, he would be in support of
it.
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 24
Councilwoman Koski inquired as to whether Planning Commission is
structured by law.
Mr. Kaszubski replied affirmatively.
Councilwoman Koski recalled that Council used to appoint members to the
Planning Commission and when the laws changed, she believed the City’s law
firm corrected it to specify mayoral appointments. She felt at that time, they
should have made this change also, but did not do it.
Mr. Kaszubski replied the state law changed to allow up to nine members, but
the prohibition on zoning was still in place. The language that had other
municipal offices had changed, basically allowing them to get on other boards
and commissions at that time except for the ZBA, only allowing one member.
He stated when that language changed around 1990, City Council had left that
language in place when the ordinance was amended, although he was not
here at that time and does not know the reason.
Councilwoman Koski felt this is not anything new and is something that should
have been done twenty years ago.
Moved by Yanez, seconded by Taylor, RESOLVED, to amend the motion on the
floor to provide for Planning Commissioners to serve on any other board other
than the Zoning Board of Appeals, subject to the one liaison.
Mayor Taylor asked Mr. Kaszubski as to whether that is a sufficient motion to
amend the motion on the floor.
Mr. Kaszubski replied affirmatively, noting one option is that he can provide the
language they are looking for in the one sentence they are trying to amend. He
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 25
believed they are trying to open it up so that all Planning Commissioners
would have the ability to sit on any board of the City, with the exclusion of only
one member allowed on the Zoning Board.
Mayor Taylor confirmed that is the motion he would entertain, that
Councilman Yanez made, and that he supported.
Councilman Radtke questioned if they are going to exclude the Zoning Board
of Appeals, should they exclude the Ordinance Board of Appeals (OBA) as well.
Mayor Taylor did not see why they would have to exclude OBA because OBA is
concerned with making sure property maintenance code is enforced. He
stressed he would like to see this on a case-by-case basis, and he was confident
they can get the feedback at the time an appointment is made. Rather than
limit it, he would like to see it broadened, and if there concerns from
Administration, they can address them at that time.
Councilwoman Koski believed Administration has recommended that Planning
Commission members can be eligible to serve on certain advisory boards, and
nine of them are listed. She questioned why they cannot just leave it as it is
written.
Mayor Taylor replied it can be left that way but he is proposing to change it.
Councilwoman Koski expressed concern that if a Planning Commission
member serves on all of the boards with the exception of the ZBA, there may
be a conflict of interest by way of them sitting on another board and having to
review the same property with which they just got through dealing. She noted
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 26
that was the purpose of limiting it to the nine boards they can serve on in
addition to the Planning Commission.
Mayor Taylor stated he does not envision a Planning Commissioner serving on
seven or eight boards. He noted that by law, they can have only one Planning
Commissioner who sits on the Board of Appeals, but he does not feel there
would be too many conflicts of interest if they sat on other boards. He
admitted Ordinance Board of Appeals (OBA) could possibly be one, but he felt
if they compare the agendas of the Planning Commission and OBA over the
last ten years, they would not find a lot of overlap between the houses that are
subject to the Ordinance Board of Appeals and the Planning Commission. He
cited the example of Council members who have outside private employment
which could occasionally result in conflict of interest, but he did not feel the
solution would be to limit Council members to only those who do not have
outside employment. He stated his opinion that they should take it on a case-
by-case basis and make it as inclusive as possible so they get the best people
who are the best fit. He is happy with the way it is written but prefers it the
way it is amended.
Councilwoman Koski asked City Administration why they are limiting nine
boards for at Planning Commission member to serve on in addition to their
appointment.
Mr. Kaszubski deferred to Mr. DeNault for the answer to that question.
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 27
Mr. DeNault explained the recommendation was made to expand it to advisory
bodies, not because of any statutory prohibitions, although there are a couple
they may have to look at on a case-by-case basis, but because they had some
concern that for many years, they were excluded from being on any other
boards and commissions because in theory they could interface with cases that
involved a site plan they did not like, and it would be coming back in front of
them in a different board. There were many other hypothetical possibilities
that they felt it safer and more prudent not to put them in those positions. Mr.
DeNault added that he does not disagree with the other comments, noting
there are conflicts in life that arise, and they have to deal with them
accordingly, professionally, and appropriately. He clarified they are here for
guidance, help and support, and to make sure they do things the right way
regardless of the direction they take.
Councilwoman Schmidt stated, upon listening to Mr. DeNault, she would be
more comfortable if they eliminated not only the Zoning Board of Appeals
(ZBA), but also the Ordinance Board of Appeals (OBA), the Corridor
Improvement Authority (CIA), and Board of Review. She felt those commissions
have the most potential for conflict with someone who is on the Planning
Commission.
Mayor Taylor stated that would still be more expansive than it was originally, so
he would be in favor of that recommendation.
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 28
Councilwoman Koski replied to inquiry that she would be more supportive if
the motion included those four boards mentioned by Councilwoman Schmidt.
Councilman Yanez replied that he would be willing to amend his amended
motion to include ZBA, OBA, CIA, and Board of Review as the four boards on
which Planning Commissioners may not serve.
Councilman Yanez replied affirmatively.
Mayor Taylor stated he would support that amendment.
Mr. Kaszubski advised that they need to vote on a motion to amend the
amended motion.
Moved by Schmidt, seconded by Taylor, RESOLVED, to amend the amended
motion that a Planning Commission member may serve on any other board or
commission except for the Ordinance Board of Appeals I and II (OBA I and II),
the Corridor Improvement Authority (CIA), the Board of Review, and the Zoning
Board of Appeals (ZBA).
Mr. DeNault clarified the amendment to the motion was phrased in such a way
that Planning Commission members would not be allowed to serve on the
ZBA. He questioned whether they are still comfortable with having a liaison
that would serve on both the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Planning
Commission.
Mayor Taylor replied asked Councilwoman Schmidt as to whether that was her
understanding as the motion maker.
Councilwoman Schmidt replied affirmatively.
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 29
Mayor Taylor that was also his understanding as supporter of the motion, so
the doubly-amended motion on the floor to be voted on includes prohibition
on OBA I, OBA II, CIA, Board of Review, and ZBA, except for the one liaison.
Roll Call Vote (on amended amendment):
Yes: Sierawski, Taylor, Yanez, Ziarko, Koski, Radtke, Schmidt.
No: None
The motion carried.
Mayor Taylor clarified this is not a Charter revision, as brought up by a member
of the public. This is an ordinance, which is within the City Council’s purview to
incorporate input from the public, as they did tonight, whereas a charter
change requires a vote of the people.
Mayor Taylor called for a vote on the amended motion.
Yes: All. The motion carried.
10. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Taylor stated this item is consideration of the Consent Agenda. He
opened the floor for public comments, but no one from the audience
commented.
Moved by Koski, seconded by Ziarko, RESOLVED, to approve the Consent
Agenda as presented:
A. To approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 5, 2020.
B. To approve payment of the bills as presented: General Fund -
$1,001,566.02, Water & Sewer Fund - $3,393,830.11, Other Funds -
$7,774,255.97, Total Checks - $12,169,652.90.
C. RESOLVED, to split the award of the bid for automobile and light truck
body repairs to Global / Lincoln of Troy Collision Center, 1735 Equity Dr.,
Troy, MI 48084, Lakeside Collision, Inc., 14665 23 Mile Road, Shelby
Township, MI 48315, and Showcase Collision, 6334 14 Mile, Warren, MI
48092, for a two-year period based on the respective unit prices bid.
D. RESOLVED, to award the bid for the 2020 Joint Sealing Program, City
Project #20-372, to Michigan Joint Sealing, 28830 W. 8 Mile, Suite 103,
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 30
Farmington Hills, MI 48336, for Section I – Joint Sealing – Local Roads in
the amount of $86,200 and Section II – Joint Sealing – Major Roads in
the amount of $25,900 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign
all documents required on behalf of the City..
E. RESOLVED, to award the bid for the purchase of Trijicon RMR red-dot
handgun sights to Michigan Police Equipment, 6521 Lansing Road,
Charlotte, MI 48813, at the unit price bid.
F. RESOLVED, to purchase twenty (20) model X26P Tasers, with
accessories, from Axon Enterprise, Inc., 17800 N 85th Street, Scottsdale,
AZ 85255, at pricing available through the State of Michigan MiDeal
cooperative purchasing program, contract #071B4300067, in the
cumulative amount of $36,916.80.
G. RESOLVED, to approve Change Order No. 1 to the Neighborhood Park
Improvements Project, Phase 8, to effectuate the re-routing of a portion
of the Clinton River Trail near Riverland Drive and parking lot
improvements at Rotary Park at a cumulative cost of $83,705.
H. RESOLVED, to approve final payment to Michigan Joint Sealing, Inc.,
28830 W. 8 Mile, Suite 103, Farmington Hills, MI 48336, in the amount of
$8,659.13, plus interest on retainage, for the 2019 Joint Sealing
Program, City Project #19-353..
I. RESOLVED, to adopt the resolution of concurrence with Industrial
Pretreatment Program (IPP) rules and regulations promulgated and
adopted by the Great Lakes Water Authority.
J. RESOLVED, to approve the First Amendment to Planned Unit
Development Agreement between the City of Sterling Heights and CCF
Development LLC for approximately ten acres of vacant property
situated on the east side of Van Dyke, north of Riverland Drive, PPCM-
1207, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute it on behalf of
the City.
Yes: All. The motion carried.
11. CONSIDERATION
A. Mayor Taylor stated this is to consider an appointment to the City of
Sterling Heights Local Development Finance Authority. He opened the floor for
comments from the public, but no one spoke. Mayor Taylor provided some
background on the nominee, Mr. Dominic Patrus, noting he is not a personal
friend of his, but felt he would be a good fit to the Authority.
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 31
Moved by Yanez, seconded by Ziarko, to appoint Dominic Patrus to the Local
Development Finance Authority to a term ending June 30, 2021, subject to the
appointee meeting the qualifications set forth in Charter §4.03 and taking the
oath of office within two weeks.
Councilman Yanez stated he knows Mr. Patrus and was confident he will be a
good fit for this position.
Councilman Radtke agreed with Councilman Yanez, adding he has known him
for some time and would be an excellent fit for the position, adding he is very
interested in local government.
Yes: All. The motion carried.
12. COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITIZENS
Mayor Taylor opened the floor for comments from citizens.
• Ms. Sanaa Elias – suggested that legitimate questions raised by
citizens could be answered by the City at the following City Council
meeting.
• Ms. Jackie Ryan – requested City Council do a Proclamation for
prayer and fasting to end the coronavirus; noted this is being done
in some communities in Texas.
• Mr. Charles Jefferson – referred to a comment made earlier about
comments made at the African American Coalition; he suggested
people can voice their opinions at Council meetings if they want to
be heard; requested the rules on proper placement of political signs
be reviewed.
• Karen – thanked police; does events called “Back the Blue” in various
communities to show support for police; would like to host one of
her events in Sterling Heights.
13. REPORTS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATION AND CITY COUNCIL
Mr. Vanderpool stated the City enforced their sign ordinance throughout the
recent primary election and they will continue to do so. He assured their sign
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 32
ordinance is something that is widely publicized to candidates, and they had a
number of violations they had to enforce, which is customary. They anticipate
they will have to do the same for the general election. He explained they
highly automated the process online and they send letters explaining the sign
ordinance to the candidates.
Mayor Taylor addressed a public comment about receiving answers to
questions asked by the public. He indicated their rules do not allow for back-
and-forth discussion, but he pointed out that Mr. Vanderpool is always taking
notes and he answers many of those questions. He added, for questions that
do not get answered by administration or council members, they are followed
up by department heads to get those questions answered. He gave kudos to
Mr. Vanderpool because he normally answers those questions, many times on
behalf of a number of different department heads.
Councilwoman Schmidt acknowledged the mayor of Centennial, Colorado,
responding to Mayor Taylor’s challenge with regard to the Census 2020. She is
not sure what the wager is going to be, but she was confident they will do
better than Centennial, Colorado. She stated she went kayaking with some
friends today on the Clinton River and highly recommended it. She stated it is
very doable for families, it is shallow, and they saw deer, turtles, and a heron,
and a lot of other wildlife. She stressed it is a gem in this city, it is so close, and
she highly recommended it.
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 33
Councilman Radtke agreed with Mr. Jefferson that the sign ordinance should
be changed but he felt it is unlikely it would pass. He questioned City Clerk
Melanie Ryska about an article he read that indicated 165 ballots arrived late
after the election at the Sterling Heights post office. He questioned whether
that number has increased.
City Clerk Ryska replied that they had a few stragglers come in, about five or
ten.
Councilman Radtke inquired as to how many ballots miss the deadline in an
average election year.
Clerk Ryska replied that for a larger election, it is not uncommon to have about
twenty or thirty that are late. She replied to further inquiry this is a larger
amount than the average election.
Councilman Radtke stated there is nothing they can do, because it is up to the
post office. He urged residents to either mail their ballots back early, or an
easier option is to drop their ballot off at one of the drop boxes located around
City Hall and the Fire Stations. He understood the postmaster was going to
investigate the matter, and he questioned whether they have received a
response from him at this point.
Clerk Ryska replied they have not yet received a response from the postmaster
but will be reaching back out to him soon.
Councilman Radtke questioned how many ballots were rejected for signature
mismatch during this recent election.
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 34
Clerk Ryska replied she does not have that number yet but assured she will get
it out to him, the Mayor and City Council.
Councilman Radtke was surprised of the low number who had the partisan
section spoiled because they crossed over between the two parties.
Clerk Ryska confirmed that is correct. She replied to further inquiry that
occurred with about 1,500 ballots.
Councilman Radtke commended the City, the City Clerk, and all of the
temporary employees who did an awesome job on Election Day. He reminded
residents to vote and get their ballots back early so their voices can be heard.
Councilman Yanez questioned Clerk Ryska about the state paying postage of
the returned ballots
Clerk Ryska confirmed that Secretary of State Benson announced a couple of
days ago that the state will be reimbursing for return postage on ballots. She
confirmed the money allocated will be reimbursed.
Councilwoman Koski questioned whether there is a way they can do some
extensive advertising with regard to the drop boxes located throughout the
City for this upcoming election.
Mr. Vanderpool responded that is a great idea, and they have had some
conversations about coming up with a public information campaign on that
issue, making sure residents know to use the drop boxes. He recalled they had
about 70 percent participation with those boxes. He emphasized if residents
are going to use the postal service, they should not mail their ballots at least a
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 35
week prior to the election date, but that will all be part of their public
information campaign they will be developing.
Councilwoman Ziarko stated her concern with the post office is not only for
ballots but also for checks people are waiting for, bills that may be late, leaving
very little turnaround time for residents to pay their bills on time. She had a call
from a resident to see if there is anything the City can do with regard to
funding the post office once again. She had questioned a Resolution; however,
Councilwoman Ziarko felt they may need something a little more aggressive.
She would appreciate information back as to what the City Council and the City
could do in this regard.
Mayor Pro-Tem Sierawski commended her colleagues, noting this was an
interesting meeting with some good debate and legislation. She appreciated
the comments from the public, adding they do listen, and even if their rules do
not allow them to directly respond, they try to get the answers and make their
decisions based on those answers. She thanked everyone for the good
discussion this evening.
14. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There was no unfinished business.
15. NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
16. CLOSED SESSION PERMITTED UNDER ACT 267 OF 1976
Mr. Kaszubski stated he has nothing tonight.
17. ADJOURN
Moved by Ziarko, seconded by Schmidt, RESOLVED, to adjourn the meeting.
Yes: All. The motion carried.
Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Page 36
The meeting adjourned at 9:14 p.m.
MELANIE D. RYSKA, City Clerk
Get email alerts for Sterling Heights
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.