City Council Work Sessions
Regular MeetingSuffolk, VA · January 19, 2022
Minutes
City Council Work Session January 19, 2022
Work Session of the Suffolk City Council was held in the City Council Chamber, 442 West Washington
Street, on Wednesday, January 19, 2022, 4:00 p.m.
PRESENT
Council Members -
Michael D. Duman, Mayor, presiding
Leroy Bennett, Vice Mayor
Shelley Butler Barlow
Roger W. Fawcett
Donald Z. Goldberg
Timothy J. Johnson
Lue R. Ward, Jr.
LeOtis L. Williams
Erika S. Dawley, City Clerk
William E. Hutchings, Jr., City Attorney
Albert S. Moor, City Manager
ABSENT
None
UPDATE ON 2021 REDISTRICTING
City Attorney Hutchings introduced Robert Loftin, McGuire Woods, LLP, the City’s redistricting
consultants. Utilizing a PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Loftin gave an update about the above referenced
item.
Members of City Council opined about the need to receive hard copies of proposal 1, proposal 2 and
modified proposal C. City Attorney Hutchings said that hard copies could be provided to City Council.
Referring to the presentation, Council Member Fawcett asked about the impact of redistricting on
Harborview. Mr. Loftin advised that everything west of I-664 would shift into the Sleepy Hole Borough.
Referring to the presentation, Council Member Fawcett queried about the inclusion of everything on the
northside of Harborview in the Sleepy Hole Borough. Mr. Loftin replied in the affirmative.
Referring to the presentation, Council Member Goldberg requested information about the overall impact
of modified proposal C. Mr. Loftin stated that the modified proposal C results in 2.8% deviation, and the
majority minority districts are Suffolk, Nansemond, Whaleyville and Cypress.
Referring to the presentation, Council Member Ward queried about the current racial breakdown of the
Suffolk Borough. Mr. Loftin said that the Suffolk Borough is currently comprised of 60% of minority
citizens and 39% of white citizens.
1
City Council Work Session January 19, 2022
Referring to the presentation, Council Member Johnson sought an overview of the impact of modified
proposal C on Holy Neck Borough. Mr. Loftin explained that the southwestern portion of Chuckatuck
and the southwestern portion of Whaleyville would be incorporated into the Holy Neck Borough under
modified proposal C. He added that the border on the eastern side of Holy Neck with Whaleyville will
remain the same.
Referring to the presentation, Vice Mayor Bennett called for a summation of the impact of modified
proposal C on the Cypress Borough. Mr. Loftin reported that the southern part of Sleepy Hole would be
incorporated into the Cypress Borough under the modified proposal C.
Referring to the presentation, Vice Mayor Bennett queried about the deviation numbers for the Cypress
Borough. Mr. Lofton said that the deviation is 2.1%, and the racial breakdown is 37% is white citizens
and 62% minority citizens.
Referring to the presentation, Council Member Williams inquired about the inclusion of Jericho in the
Whaleyville Borough under the modified proposal C. Mr. Loftin replied in the affirmative.
Referring to the presentation, Council Member Goldberg asked about the location of Whaleyville
village. Mr. Loftin advised it is located in Whaleyville Borough.
Referring to the presentation, Council Member Ward asked for information about the western boundary
of Nansemond Borough under modified proposal C. Mr. Loftin advised that Interstate 664 is the
western boundary of the Nansemond Borough under the modified proposal C.
Referring to the presentation, Council Member Ward opined about the status of Pughsville in
Nansemond Borough under the modified proposal C. Mr. Loftin stated that Pughsville remains a unified
neighborhood in the Nansemond Borough under the modified proposal C.
Referring to the presentation, Council Member Johnson opined about the legal defensibility of proposal
1, proposal 2 and modified proposal C. Mr. Loftin indicated that all three proposals are legally
defensible.
Council Member Fawcett moved to present proposal 1 and proposal 2 for a public hearing at the earliest
feasible date. The motion failed to receive a second.
Council Member Goldberg asked for clarification of Council Member Fawcett’s motion. Mayor Duman
said that the motion only allows for consideration of proposal 1 and proposal 2.
Council Member Fawcett, on a motion seconded by Council Member Goldberg, moved to present
proposal 1 and proposal 2 for a public hearing at the earliest feasible date.
Council Member Johnson, on a substitute motion by Council Member Butler Barlow, moved to present
proposal 1, proposal 2 and modified proposal C for a public hearing.
Referring to the substitute motion, Council Member Ward queried about the public selecting the final
map. Mayor Duman clarified that the purpose of the public hearing would be to receive public comment,
not to select the map.
2
City Council Work Session January 19, 2022
Referring to the substitute motion, City Attorney Hutchings stated that he did not hear a specific date in
the motion but explained scheduling a public hearing for the February 2, 2022, City Council meeting
would not allow enough time to meet the advertising requirements.
City Clerk Dawley asked Council Member Johnson and Council Member Butler Barlow if they were
amenable to scheduling the public hearing at the February 16, 2022, City Council meeting. Council
Member Johnson and Council Member Butler Barlow both replied in the affirmative.
Council Member Johnson, on a substitute motion by Council Member Butler Barlow, moved schedule a
public hearing to receive public comment on City redistricting maps proposal 1, proposal 2 and modified
proposal C at the February 16, 2022, City Council meeting, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Duman, Vice Mayor Bennett, and Council Members Butler Barlow
Fawcett, Goldberg, Johnson, Ward and Williams 8
NAYS: None 0
CLOSED MEETING
City Clerk Dawley presented the Closed Meeting motion for City Council’s consideration:
1. Pursuant to Virginia Code Sections 2.2-3711(A)(8) and (A)(1), the consultation with legal
counsel employed by a public body regarding specific legal matters requiring the legal advice
of such counsel, and the discussion, consideration, or interviews of prospective candidates for
appointment and the assignment, appointment, and performance of specific public officers or
appointees of the City, specifically the appointments as shown on the attached list for
vacancies or term expirations for the Clean Community Commission, Early Childhood
Development Commission, Economic Development Authority of the City of Suffolk, Fine
Arts Commission, Historic Landmarks Commission, Human Services Advisory Board, Local
Board of Building Code Appeals, Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission, Sister Cities
Commission, The Planning Council, Tidewater Youth Services and Western Tidewater
Community Service Board.
Council Member Fawcett, on a motion seconded by Council Member Goldberg, moved that
City Council convene in a closed meeting for the above referenced purposes, by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Mayor Duman, Vice Mayor Bennett, and Council Members Butler Barlow
Fawcett, Goldberg, Johnson, Ward and Williams 8
NAYS: None 0
3
City Council Work Session January 19, 2022
City Council convened in Closed Meeting at 4:51 p.m. The Closed Meeting concluded at 5:02 p.m.
Teste: ____________________________________________
Erika S. Dawley, MMC, City Clerk
Approved: _________________________________________
Michael D. Duman, Mayor
APPROVED: JULY 20, 2022
4
Agenda
SUFFOLK CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
January 19, 2022
4:00 p.m.
City Council Chamber
1. Update on 2021 Redistricting
2.* Appointments
* Proposed Items for Closed Session
Get email alerts for Suffolk
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.