Historic Landmarks Commission Packets

HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION MARCH 8, 2018 THE REGULAR MEETING WILL BE HELD AT 9:00 A.M. IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY HALL BUILDING NOTE: IF YOU CANNOT ATTEND THIS MEETING, PLEASE CALL THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING BY 12:00 NOON, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 7, 2018 514-4060 RANDY HICKS CHAIRMAN PREPARED BY THE CITY OF SUFFOLK DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF PLANNING  AGENDA Historic Landmarks Commission Meeting Thursday, March 8, 2018 9:00 a.m. I. Call to Order: Chairman II. Roll Call III. Approval of the Minutes IV. New Business 1. REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS HLC2018-00002, submitted by Jen Stringer-Kelly of For the People Projects, agent, and Robert C. Barclay, manager, on behalf of EWS Properties, LLC, property owner, to amend the approved conditions for Certificate of Appropriateness HC2017-00023 to include a change of exterior materials for property located at 212 East Washington Street. The property is further identified as Zoning Map 34, Block A, Parcels 220 and 221, Suffolk Voting Borough, zoned CBD, Central Business District, and HC, Historic Conservation Overlay District. 2. REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS HLC2018-00005, submitted by Whitney G. Saunders, Saunders & Ojeda P.C., agent, on behalf of Judith W. Godwin, property owner, for exterior material alterations to property located at 504 West Washington Street. The property is further identified as Zoning Map 34G17, Block 2B, Parcel 1, Suffolk Voting Borough, zoned CBD, Central Business District, and HC, Historic Conservation Overlay District. V. Staff Reports A. Enforcement Update B. Administrative Approvals VI. Adjournment 2  MINUTES HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION February 8, 2018 9:00 A.M. The regular meeting of the Historic Landmarks Commission was held on Thursday, February 8 2018, 9:00 a.m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 442 W. Washington Street, Suffolk, Virginia, with the following persons present: MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF: Susan Coley Claire Jones, Comprehensive Planning Manager Merritt Draper Karla Carter, Assistant City Attorney Oliver Hobbs Amy Thurston, Planner I Edward King Jillian Scott-Hale, Office Assistant Vivian Turner Mary Austin Darden MEMBERS ABSENT: Randy Hicks The meeting was called to order by Vice-Chairman Hobbs. The roll was called by Ms. Jones and the Vice-Chairman was informed that a quorum was present. The minutes of the previous meeting were approved as presented. 3 REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS HLC2017-030, submitted by George Haley, property owner, for exterior material alterations and additions to property located at 139 and 147 East Washington Street. The property is further identified as Zoning Map 34G18, Block A, Parcel 282*283, Suffolk Voting Borough, zoned CBD, Central Business District, and HC, Historic Conservation Overlay District. The first item of business was introduced by the Vice-Chairman, followed by report by Amy Thurston, Planner I. Ms. Thurston stated the subject property is located between Main Street and Commerce Street and is part of the 2002 East Washington Street Expansion of the Suffolk Historic Conservation Overlay District. The property is zoned CBD, Central Business District, which allows a variety of business and residential uses. The most common building form noted in this area is brick-fronted Italianate or Vernacular style commercial structures. According to the National Register, the subject property was constructed circa 1950-1965 as an auto-oriented commercial building and was listed as a contributing structure in the Historic District. The front façade originally featured an angled storefront that was characteristic of mid-century modern architecture, making it unique to the Historic District. Since the period of significance, this property has undergone substantial renovations that removed many of the original features, thus compromising the property’s historic integrity and its contributing status to the District. The most recent Certificate of Appropriateness granted for the subject property was HC-2015-016, which was approved by the Commission in August of 2015. This COA allowed the original angled storefront wall located on the north (front) elevation to be rebuilt in a straight alignment, which removed the main defining 4 feature of the building’s mid-century modern architecture. The COA approved in 2015 also allowed the installation of one exterior door with raised panels on the east elevation facing the parking lot and one matching door on the rear elevation facing the alley that were not installed. No new windows were approved to be installed on any elevation other than the front façade; however, several windows were installed on the east, west, and south elevations without a COA. In addition, a ramp was installed without a COA. The Historic District Design Guidelines recommend that exterior alterations to non- contributing buildings should be designed to complement and not detract from historic properties. Ms. Thurston explained that the proposed metal raised panel doors are appropriate for the redesigned front elevation of this building and are the same as the previously approved doors from HC2015-016, which were not installed. Ms. Thurston added that an existing column on the right side of the storefront was required to be refaced with a new brick base and decorative column. This work was not completed; hence, it is recommended that this work be included as part of the new COA. During a site visit to the property, it was brought to staff’s attention that a small fence was installed without approval. This fence detracts from the storefront appearance and is uncharacteristic of the Historic District; therefore, staff recommends that it be removed. Ms. Thurston explained that the solid metal security doors that have been installed on the east elevation do not comply with the approved COA from 2015 and should be replaced with black raised panel doors in order to come into compliance, as well as to create consistency and improve the overall aesthetic of 5 the building. Ms. Thurston stated that the proposed storefront windows on the east elevation match the storefront windows and raised panels previously approved on the front elevation which would create consistency on the building and provide improved visibility. The second window style proposed consists of a fixed, divided-light, aluminum window consisting of sixteen (16) lights; 4 are proposed in the center of this elevation where three openings current exist. The 16-light windows are similar to the original windows on the west elevation and new ones used on nearby buildings; thus, they are appropriate provided that they utilize exterior muntins. While the subject building was originally constructed as a service station, it has since been converted into office space; thus, it is fitting to consider allowing additional windows to support the reuse of the property. Lastly while viewing the east elevation, staff considered the appropriateness of the proposed ADA ramps. Ramps are permitted provided that they are installed at an appropriate location to lessen the visual impact on the right of way and avoid interference with architectural features. Both ramps are situated far back from East Washington Street, where they are not highly visible or impactful to the building’s architecture. Staff recommends that the handrails be constructed with wood using a traditional style and painted to match the main building. Ms. Thurston stated that the proposed ramps must also comply with the Uniform Statewide Building Code. The exterior door on the south elevation does not comply with the raised panel doors approved from the 2015 COA; therefore, it should be replaced with a black raised panel door. In addition, one window on the south and one window on the west were not previously 6 approved but would be considered appropriate provided that exterior muntins be installed in order to create 16 divided lights. Staff also recommends that an existing boarded up door on the west elevation be replaced with a black raised panel door, as well, for consistency across all facades. Ms. Thurston stated that, based on the previous findings-of-fact, staff recommends approval of the following actions requested by Certificate of Appropriateness, HLC2017-030, with the conditions noted in the staff support. The public hearing was opened and speaking in favor was George Haley, property owner. Mr. Haley apologized for the project not complying with the previous application approval and for the inconsistency of the work. Mr. Haley stated that he had hired subcontractors to do the work while he was out of town but that he would be the one that would oversee the project from this point forward and finish the work as approved. There being no more speakers in favor or in opposition, the public hearing was closed. After a brief discussion of the process for reviewing the implementation of approved conditions, a motion was made by Commissioner King to approve staff’s recommendation as presented. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Turner and passed by a recorded vote of 6-0. New Business: Enforcement Update Donald Bennett, (Planning & Community Development) reported on the following properties: 221 Bank Street – Court case dismissed 7 121 Pinner Street – Court case dismissed 209 Pearl Street – Ongoing work at property 221 Pinner Street – Court case reopened for March 1, 2018 New Business: Zoning Update Matthew Levy, (Planning & Community Development) reported on the following properties: 412 N. Main Street – Conditional Use Permit approved 216 Grace Street – No service for property owner, have to pursue other avenues There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. 8  HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION Motion: To Approve Application February 8, 2018 1st: King 2nd: Turner ATTENDANCE HC-2017-030 VOTE: 6-0 COMMISSIONERS YES NO PRESENT ABSENT Coley, Susan M. X X Darden Mary Austin, X X Draper, Merritt X X Hicks, Randy, X Chairman Hobbs, Oliver, X X Vice-Chairman King, Edward L. X X Turner, Vivian X X  CITY OF SUFFOLK 442 W WASHINGTON STREET, SUFFOLK, VIRGINIA 23439-1858 PHONE: (757) 514-4060 FAX: (757) 514-4099 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning To: Historic Landmarks Commission From: Claire Jones, AICP, Secretary Date: March 8, 2018 Re: REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS HLC2018-00002, submitted by Jen Stringer-Kelly of For the People Projects, agent, and Robert C. Barclay, manager, on behalf of EWS Properties, LLC, property owner, to amend the approved conditions for Certificate of Appropriateness HC2017-00023 to include a change of exterior materials for property located at 212 East Washington Street. The property is further identified as Zoning Map 34, Block A, Parcels 220 and 221, Suffolk Voting Borough, zoned CBD, Central Business District, and HC, Historic Conservation Overlay District. Issue On January 31, 2018, an application to amend Certificate of Appropriateness HC2017-00023 was submitted to the Planning Division for review. The original Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) was requested for exterior alterations, site improvements, lighting, and signage on property located at 212 East Washington Street, and was approved unanimously by the Historic Landmarks Commission on July 13, 2017. The subject property is a contributing structure that was built circa 1900-1914 and served as the home for the Elliott Motor Company. The structure is typical of the commercial buildings constructed in Suffolk during the first quarter of the 20th century, with a decorative parapet, large plate glass windows, and a central entry. The following items were requested for this property and included in the approval of HC2017-00023: • Cleaning, repointing, and painting all exterior brick building walls. • Re-opening and inserting glass into existing transom windows on the front façade. • Constructing a new covered outdoor seating area on the east side of the building consisting of steel and brick veneer columns, wooden railings, and an overhead shade sail system. HLC2018-00002 March 8, 2018 Page 2 • One (1) new circular metal wall sign approximately thirty-five (35) square feet in area to be centered above the storefront entrance, with one (1) black gooseneck light fixture above. • One (1) new aluminum side door and one (1) new set of wooden six (6) panel double doors to be located on the rear with four (4) wood-framed transom windows above. • Six (6) exterior gooseneck wall-mounted light fixtures above the storefront windows with a satin red finish, and one (1) on the rear of the building. • An eight (8) foot tall wooden dumpster enclosure in the north-eastern corner of property. • A six (6) foot tall wooden privacy fence to conceal the outdoor storage/HVAC at the rear of building. • Streetscape landscaping. • Restriping existing parking lot and establishing one-way directional flow of vehicles. Due to a change in circumstances encountered as the applicant pursued completion of the approved actions, as well as discovery of an omitted item from the original application, the applicant now requests to amend three approved items and include one additional item in a revised COA for the subject property. Public Notice Public notice of this meeting was published in the newspaper and notices were mailed to adjacent property owners. Proposed Actions The applicant’s request includes the following minor actions that can be approved administratively: 1. Changing the number of lights in the storefront transom from nine (9) to sixteen (16) to match the historic layout. 2. Revised door design at rear entry using the same materials and paint colors previously approved. 3. Reduction in the number of light fixtures on the front façade from six (6) to two (2). The applicant’s request consists of the following major action which requires HLC approval: HLC2018-00002 March 8, 2018 Page 3 1. Replacement of central brick and wood front entry and single leaf door with an aluminum storefront system with a double leaf entry door. Applicable Regulations A. Suffolk Historic District Design Guidelines 1. Chapter 1, Section F, Appropriate Design of Additions and Alterations for Buildings: Changes to historic buildings should be appropriately designed to be compatible with the architecture and overall character of the historic district. Additions and alterations to buildings require careful design in order to preserve and strengthen the character of the district. To this end, repair and maintenance activity involving exterior materials, finishes, windows, doors, awnings, signage, fencing and landscaping should be carefully planned to avoid negatively affecting the district’s overall character. 2. Chapter 4, Section C.3, Guidelines for Window Preservation: Maintain the Original Window Patterns: Do not change the number, location, size, or glazing pattern of windows by cutting new openings, blocking in windows, or installing replacement sash that do not fit the window opening. 3. Chapter 4, Section D.2, Guidelines for Doors: Maintain Historic Door Arrangements: Avoid changing the number, location, or size of doors by enlarging or reducing the original door opening or installing replacement doors that do not fit the original openings. Use Compatible Door Styles: When replacing doors, use door styles that relate to those found in the district. 4. Chapter 6, Section C.2, Guidelines for Mercantile Buildings: Preserve and rehabilitate original window/door openings, window sashes, window/door muntin patterns and window/door trim to maintain and strengthen not only the building's historic character but also that of the surrounding area as well. Preserve and rehabilitate the original historic façade materials. This would include carefully cleaning the historic brick, stone, and tile where needed and repointing or repairing damaged areas. B. Secretary of the Interior Standards Guideline #9: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Staff Analysis In regard to the minor actions included with this request, staff has reviewed the following items and found them to be compatible with the architectural character of the structure and the requirements of the Suffolk Historic District guidelines: HLC2018-00002 March 8, 2018 Page 4 1. The storefront transom has been redesigned to be a total of sixteen lights, revised from nine lights in previous design. The storefront design is proposed to be revised because the existing material was found to be rotten and unsuitable for the treatment described in the original COA submittal. Because the material had to be removed and replaced, the historic tax credit requirements stipulate that the new design match the design seen in historic photos. For this reason, the applicant requests approval of a sixteen-light design with a six/four/six pattern, which follows the configuration documented by historic photographs of the property. The storefront transom will be constructed of paint grade poplar wood and will be painted as approved by the previous COA. 2. The infill panels and wood door design at the rear entrance have been altered to include one egress door and two panels on either side. Although the approved design included wooden six (6) panel double doors and a four-light transom, the proposed new design retains the essential design elements and materials using wood and glass with recessed panels and a 6-light transom. The wood will be painted as approved by the previous COA. 3. The number of gooseneck light fixtures on the front façade have been reduced from six to two. This reduction is at the request of Paige Pollard of Commonwealth Preservation Group, and is intended to create a more historically compatible façade. The black sign light from the original COA submittal will be included in the design. In regard to the major action included with this request, staff has reviewed the following item and found that it is compatible with architectural character of the structure and utilizes a door style that relates to those found in the district as required by the Guidelines. 1. A new aluminum storefront system with double leaf entry door was included in the architectural drawings with the original COA submittal; however, this item was not included in the request narrative and was subsequently excluded from evaluation and inclusion in the approved items for HC2017-00023. The applicant had begun work on this element, believing that it had been approved. Approval of this entry element is requested because these doors are similar to what existed and are of a character seen throughout the district. The double leaf door also allows easier access to the business. The new storefront required partial removal of the brick knee wall and wood framed windows around the preexisting single leaf door to accommodate the new double leaf entry door. The proposed aluminum storefront system follows a similar configuration and, along with retention of the brick and wood elements on either side and integration of the historically appropriate transoms above, results in an integrated design that honors the original appearance of the building. In addition, the entry is still recessed and uses materials that relate to the existing façade materials and to other similar entries found in the district. HLC2018-00002 March 8, 2018 Page 5 Summary and Recommendations Staff has reviewed this application and found that the requested amendments do not constitute a substantial departure from the approved COA, HC2017-00023, nor would they substantially change the architectural character of the structure. Based on the above findings-of-fact, staff recommends approval of the following actions requested by Certificate of Appropriateness, HLC2018-00002, with the conditions noted below: 1. Changing the number of lights in the storefront transom from nine (9) to sixteen (16) to match the historic layout. 2. Revised door design at rear entry using the same materials and paint colors previously approved. 3. Reduction in the number of light fixtures on the front façade from six (6) to two (2). 2. Replacement of central brick and wood front entry and single leaf door with an aluminum storefront system with a double leaf entry door. Attachments cc: Robert C, Barclay, Manager HLC2018-02  ZONING/LAND USE MAP HLC2018-02 RM KLIN FRA N 34G18(A)*220 34G18(A)*221 R PINN E CBD WAS H I N GT ON N&W FRRD s HLC2018-00002 HC2017-00023  CITY OF SUFFOLK 442 W. WASHINGTON STREET, P.O. BOX 1858, SUFFOLK, VIRGINIA 23439-1858 PHONE: (757) 514-4060 FAX: (757) 514-4099 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning To: Historic Landmarks Commission From: Amy Thurston, Planner I Date: March 8, 2018 Subject: REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS HLC2018- 00005, submitted by Whitney G. Saunders, Saunders & Ojeda P.C., agent, on behalf of Judith W. Godwin, property owner, for exterior material alterations to property located at 504 West Washington Street. The property is further identified as Zoning Map 34G17, Block 2B, Parcel 1, Suffolk Voting Borough, zoned CBD, Central Business District, and HC, Historic Conservation Overlay District. STAFF REPORT Overview of the Subject Property and Surrounding Area The subject property is located at 504 West Washington Street between Brewer Avenue and Pender Street, which is one block west of the Suffolk Police Headquarters building. This property is part of the West End Expansion of the Suffolk Historic Conservation Overlay District. The majority of the buildings in this neighborhood date from the last decade of the nineteenth century through the first four decades of the twentieth century. The architectural styles in the area include Vernacular, Italianate, Queen Anne, Colonial Revival, Classical Revival, Tudor Revival, Bungalow/Craftsman, and American foursquare. According to the National Register of Historic Places Nomination Form, the subject property is the earliest surviving dwelling within the West End neighborhood and was constructed circa 1865; however, other historic records indicate that it was constructed circa 1830. This home was built by Thomas Jefferson Kilby and served as the headquarters for the provost marshal during the Union occupation of Suffolk. The Greek Revival structure originally consisted of the central, three-bay portion of the building that contains a front gable roof, weatherboard siding, and stucco foundation. The original roof material is unknown. In the 1940’s, two one-story wings with flat roofs and stucco-clad walls were added to the east and west sides of the dwelling. Also during that time, the original front porch was removed and the elevated front door was relocated to ground floor level, which resulted in a dramatic change to the building’s historic appearance. Case History There are no previous Certificates of Appropriateness on file for the subject property. HLC2018-00005 March 8, 2018 Page 2 Public Notice Public notice of this meeting was published in the newspaper and notices were mailed to adjacent property owners. Proposed Actions The applicant’s request consists of the following actions: 1. Replace the gray asbestos shingles on the gable roof and in the area where the garage and house meet with Timberline Ultra High Definition Architectural Shingles in slate (due to damage caused by a fallen tree). 2. Replace the metal flat roof over the west addition only, which is not visible to the right of way, with a white EPDM rubber roof system. 3. Repair the parapet on the west addition utilizing matching materials, block and stucco, and paint white to match the rest of the building. 4. Paint the entire building white. Condition Statement In accordance with the Historic District Design Guidelines, the applicant submitted a condition statement and description of the proposed repairs from John Duke of Duke Roofing. The proposed actions listed are necessitated by tree damage and include replacement of hazardous materials (asbestos). Surrounding Characteristics As previously stated, the surrounding properties consist of contributing structures built between1890-1940. Many of the original roofs that were constructed with metal shingles have since been replaced with architectural shingles because metal shingles are no longer produced. In addition, many of the original roofing materials were replaced prior to 2004 when the West End was nominated to the Suffolk Historic Conservation Overlay District. A description of the surrounding properties is provided below. 457 West Washington Street- Contributing Queen Anne dwelling constructed circa 1890. The original gable/hipped roof consisted of metal shingles that have since been replaced with architectural shingles due to hurricane damage (approved by HC-2004-03 on 1/13/2004). 500 West Washington Street- Contributing Bungalow/Craftsman home constructed circa 1910-1925 with a hipped roof comprised of architectural shingles (approved by HLC2017-20 on 10/12/2017). The original roof material was replaced with asphalt shingles prior to inclusion in the historic district. 501 West Washington Street- Contributing West End Baptist Church constructed circa 1938 in Colonial Revival architecture. The original roof consisted of wood shingles and it still utilizes wood shingles today. HLC2018-00005 March 8, 2018 Page 3 509 West Washington Street- Contributing funeral home constructed between 1915 and 1930 in Colonial Revival architecture. This structure is noted as having a hipped roof with asphalt shingles. 512 West Washington Street- Contributing Queen Anne dwelling constructed between 1890 and 1905. This structure is noted as having a hipped roof with metal shingles that are still in place. 514 West Washington Street- Contributing Queen Anne home constructed circa 1885- 1900. The original metal roof shingles have been recently repaired. Site Modifications No site modifications are proposed. Applicable Regulations A. Suffolk Historic District Design Guidelines Chapter 5, Section I, Roofs:  The roof is one of the most important elements of a structure.  Roof designs vary considerably within the Historic Conservation Overlay District and are one of the key character-defining elements of the style of the house. The type of roof covering is also important in defining the character, formality, structure, and texture of the house and the street. Consequently, historic roofing materials should be preserved and maintained.  Traditional roofing material such as standing seam metal are preferred over asphalt shingles but are not required.  When the original roofing material has already been replaced with asphalt shingles and re-roofing becomes necessary, then, at a minimum, the roofing materials shall be upgraded to an architectural-grade shingle.  A signed statement, with exhibits, from a licensed general contractor stating the condition of the existing roof, ability to be repaired, need for replacement, proposed corrective measures, and options for replacement is required as supporting documentation for any application for a Certificate of Appropriateness. B. Secretary of the Interior Standards The Secretary of the Interior Standards, which are included in Appendix A of the Historic Guidelines, encourage the repair and preservation of existing historic materials and character defining elements. Where replacement is determined to be necessary, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. The design of replacement features shall also be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. Exterior alterations shall not destroy historic materials that characterize a property. HLC2018-00005 March 8, 2018 Page 4 Staff Analysis The Historic District Design Guidelines state that if a structure still utilizes historic roofing materials, the historic materials should be preserved and maintained where possible. In cases where re-roofing becomes necessary, then, at a minimum, the roofing materials shall be upgraded to an architectural-grade shingle. The gray asbestos shingles on the gable roof of the subject property were installed as part of the 1940 renovations and are not original, although they are part of the 1940 Greek Revival redesign of the house and common to that era. The original 1830 material was not documented. Due to the structure’s age, it is possible that the original roof may have consisted of wood shingles. In cases where the original or preexisting roof materials are no longer produced, such as the case with the existing asbestos shingles, the Historic Landmarks Commission has traditionally allowed architectural-grade shingles as a compatible substitute material. The proposed Timberline Ultra High Definition Architectural Shingles consisting of a slate color will complement the subject property and not detract from the remaining Greek Revival features. In addition, the front gable roof reduces the visibility of the roofing materials from the right of way. The flat roof on the west addition is concealed by a parapet, thus is not visible from the right of the way and the roof material used in this area will not impact the historic appearance or architectural style of the building. The proposed white rubber EPDM roof materials have been approved on other flat roofs in the Historic District that are not visible to the right of way; thus it is considered an acceptable substitute material in this location. In regard to the proposed repairs to the parapet and exterior painting, they are both in-kind changes that will assist in maintaining the property and will not result in a change in appearance or materials. Summary and Recommendations Based on the previous findings-of-fact, staff recommends approval of the following actions requested by Certificate of Appropriateness, HLC2018-00005, with the conditions noted below: 1. Replace the gray asbestos shingles on the gable roof and in the area where the garage and house meet with Timberline Ultra High Definition Architectural Shingles in slate. 2. Replace the metal flat roof over the west addition only, which is not visible to the right of way, with a white EPDM rubber roof system. 3. Repair the parapet on the west addition utilizing matching materials, block and stucco, so as to match the remainder of the parapet in dimensions, appearance, and details. Paint the parapet white to match the rest of the building. 4. Paint the entire building white. 5. Any additional improvements shall require a Certificate of Appropriateness. 6. All required building and zoning permits shall be obtained from the City of Suffolk. Attachments cc: Judith W. Godwin, property owner HLC2018-00005 M ZONING / LAND USE MAP HLC2018-00005 ST PEND ER RM MARKET ST L HENLEY P CBD R AVE B R E WE 34G17(2)B*1 W WASH IN GTON ST AVE MES AV E s LINDE N SA INT J NS S T A WELLO JA C K S O N ST User Name: bsmith Date: 2/20/2018 HLC2018-00005 - 504 West Washington Street Subject property: 1 HLC2018-00005 - 504 West Washington Street Street views: 2 HLC2018-00005 - 504 West Washington Street Aerial view from the rear of the property/north showing the flat metal roof and asbestos shingles: 3 HLC2018-00005 - 504 West Washington Street 4 HLC2018-00005 - 504 West Washington Street Historic photograph of original structure: 5 Zoning Case Activity Report March 2018 PROPERTY OWNER(s) LOCATION VIOLATION(s) JUDGEMENT INSPECTOR Zoning-Changing windows without a Raven P. Coston 222 Pinner St Court 3/1/2018 Matt COA Shore Breeze, LLC/ Lashawn Howard 216 Grace St Zoning-Exceeding scope of COA Referred to court/no service Matt Gregory Mitchell 131 Clay St Zoning- Installed roof with no COA Court 4/5/2018 Matt Zoning- Installed roof with no COA COA pending - application Megan Church Rainey 103 Linden Ave Matt (Premier Roofing) incomplete