Historic District / Board of Architectural Review

Board of Architectural Review September 3rd, 2024 Meeting at 6:00pm For additional information regarding this meeting please contact the Planning Department at 843.851.4214. All related documents for this meeting are available for review online and the meeting will be livestreamed via www.summervillesc.gov Approval of Minutes: 1. August 13th, 2024 minutes Public Hearing: (*Please be advised, if you would like to speak at this time, you must sign up prior to the meeting and comments must be regarding items on the agenda*) Old Business: 1. 309 W Richardson Ave – Request for front door replacement – TMS # 137-07-02-005 New Business: 1. 106 Pine Grove Ave – Request for approval after the fact for re-roof with new material TMS # 145- 02-11-007 2. 135 W Richardson Ave – Request for installation of mural TMS # 137-07-07-020 3. 800 S Main St – Request for installation of light fixtures to exterior and exception for signage requirements TMS # 137-14-05-013 4. 305 Beaufort St – Request for approval after the fact for renovated front porch and railing TMS # 137-09-05-002 Miscellaneous: 1. N/A Adjourn: Agenda Posted: 8/27/2024  Board of Architectural Review Meeting Minutes August 13, 2024 Members Present Phil Dixon, Chairman Tim Kennedy Jane Knight Nancyjean Nettles Members Absent Beth Huggins Rachel Burton David Price Staff Present Remy Clark, Planner II Tommy O’Malley, Intern Items on Agenda - Approval of Minutes 1. July 2nd. 2024 Minutes - Old Business 1. 520 W 2nd South St – Request for renewal of expired certificate of occupancy – TMS # 137- 06-07-033 2. 608 Central Ave – Request for approval of changes made after the face for new construction – TMS # 137-05-05-002 3. 112 Salisbury Dr – Request for back porch/carport addition – TMS # 137-13-04-015 - New Business 1. 309 W Richardson Ave – Request for front door replacement – TMS # 137-07-02-005 2. 803 S Main St – Request to replace existing picket fence with privacy fence along rear yard – TMS # 137-14-06-001 3. 210 E Richardson Ave – Request for front of house renovation to include screened porch and stoop – TMS # 137-07-17-003 4. 408 Sumter Ave – Request to demolish and rebuild detached garage – TMS # 137-10-09-00 - Miscellaneous N/A Approval of Minutes The meeting was called to order at 6:00pm. Chairman Dixon asked for consideration of the July 2nd, 2024 meeting minutes. Ms. Nettles moved to approve the minutes as presented. Ms. Knight seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Public Hearing No comments were submitted. Board Review Old Business 1. 520 W 2nd South St – Request for renewal of expired certificate of occupancy (TMS#: 137-06-07-033) Mr. Clark explained that the applicants were seeking renewal of an expired certificate of occupancy with no alterations to the previously agreed upon plan. The applicant reiterated this. Mr. Kennedy moved to approve the application as presented. Ms. Nettles seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 2. 608 Central Ave – Request for approval of changes made after the fact for new construction (TMS # 137-05-05-002)  Mr. Clark explained that the applicants were seeking approval for changes made to a previously approved application, specifically regarding the omission of louver vents and brick steps at the rear porch. Mr. Clark noted that the applicants request these changes made in the field be approved in lieu of the previous design. The applicant explained that changes were made in favor of general aesthetics and functionality. Ms. Knight moved to approve the application as presented. Mr. Kennedy seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 3. 112 Salisbury Dr – Request for back porch/carport addition (TMS # 137-13-04-015) Mr. Clark explained that the applicant was returning after last month’s meeting to present more detailed plans and noted that this project is not visible from the right-of-way. Mr. Kennedy noted that while the plans felt “awkward”, it was not visible from the right-of- way. Ms. Knight moved to approve the application as presented. Ms. Nettles seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. New Business 1. 309 W Richardson Ave – Front door replacement (TMS # 137-09-03-012) Mr. Clark explained that the application concerns a front door replacement. Ms. Nettles noted the proposed changes in number of panes, while Mr. Kennedy noted the proposed change in material from wood to fiberglass. Mr. Kennedy expressed discomfort in this change of material, suggesting that a wooden door might fit the historic character of the  home better. Mr. Dixon suggested this application be discussed next month, giving the applicant more time to select an alternative option for the new door. Mr. Clark mentioned that if the homeowner replaced the door in kind, it could be approved at a staff level. No vote was taken. The Board and applicant agreed to reconsider the application at the September 3rd meeting. 2. 803 S Main – Request to replace existing picket fence with privacy fence along rear yard (TMS # 137-05-05-002) Mr. Clark explained that the applicants were seeking to extend an already existing privacy fence along the rear yard. The applicant explained that existing picket fencing along S Main would not be disturbed. Mr. Kennedy moved to approve the application as submitted. Ms. Nettles seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 3. 210 E Richardson Ave – Request for front of house renovation to include screened porch and stoop. (TMS # 137-07-17-003) Mr. Clark explained that the applicants were seeking to replace one of the front doors with a window to match the front façade of the home, in addition to seeking approval for replacing ironwork on front porch as well as additional renovations to the porch and stoop. The applicants specified that the windows were to be replaced in kind and provided examples of the proposed ironwork design. Mr. Kennedy moved to approve the  application as submitted. Ms. Nettles seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 4. 408 Sumter Ave – Request to demolish and rebuild detached garage (TMS # 137-10-09- 008) Mr. Clark explained that the applicant was seeking approval to demolish and rebuild a detached garage. Mr. Clark noted that the proposed carport structure would not be permitted per the UDO, as existing nonconforming structures may not be expanded upon. Mr. Dixon opened the floor for any comments on demolition; none were made. The applicant explained that the proposed structure would sit on the back of the property, not visible from the right-of-way, and would match the house in design and color. Mr. Kennedy moved to accept the application as submitted with the omission of the car port as noted. Ms. Nettles seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Miscellaneous N/A Adjourn There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:50 pm on a motion by Mr. Kennedy, and a second by Ms. Knight. The motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Remy Clark, Planner II 8/27/2024 Approved: _______________________ Philip G. Dixon PE, CFM, Chairman  STAFF REPORT BAR Meeting August 6th, 2024 To: Town of Summerville BAR From: Remy Clark, Planner II Date: 8/27/2024 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: HOPE MARTHA SUE Owner: HOPE MARTHA SUE Requested Action: Final Approval Existing Zoning/Land Use: GR-2, existing residence Location: 309 W Richardson Ave Rating: 4 - Supportive Proposed Alterations: Request for front door replacement Guideline Citation: 5.4 GENERAL GUIDELINES Evaluation: Per Board comments at August 27th meeting, applicant has provided an exhibit of a proposed door addressing BAR comments regarding material and pane ratio.  STAFF REPORT BAR Meeting August 6th, 2024 To: Town of Summerville BAR From: Remy Clark, Planner II Date: 8/27/2024 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: JOHNNY BIHLEAR Owner: CHELLIS ADELLE H Requested Action: Final Approval Existing Zoning/Land Use: GR-2, existing residence Location: 106 Pine Grove Ave Rating: N/A (No Rating) Proposed Alterations: Request for approval for re-roof after the fact Guideline Citation: 5.14 GUIDELINES FOR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES Guideline 53. Roofing Material Evaluation: Re-roof completed without BAR approval. The roof was previously shingle but has been replaced with 5V metal roofing. Per Historic District Guidelines, standing seam is the standard for metal roofing within the Historic District.  STAFF REPORT BAR Meeting August 6th, 2024 To: Town of Summerville BAR From: Remy Clark, Planner II Date: 8/27/2024 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: JANA RILEY Owner: PUBLIC WORKS ART CENTER Requested Action: Final Approval Existing Zoning/Land Use: D-MX, Public Works Art Center Location: 135 W Richardson Ave Rating: 2 - Notable Proposed Alterations: Request for approval for installation of mural Guideline Citation: UDO 10.8.4 Wall Murals Evaluation: Mural will be installed on loading dock and will be visible from S Cedar St right-of-way. Proposed mural design appears to meet requirements of UDO 10.8.4. Per 10.8.4A, BAR review is required.  Osiris Rain Public Works Art Center Mural Proposal With this design, I aimed to blend the nostalgic charm of vintage stamps to tie into the history of the building, balanced with modern elements through vivid colors and abstract shapes. Using the bay door and the corrugated metal as stamp-like shapes, I incorporated motifs that reflect the region and my personal childhood memories. These motifs are intended to blend into the totality of the piece to be discovered like “easter eggs” each time the mural is seen anew. From left to right: • Carolina Honeysuckle: This element evokes fond memories of childhood summers spent exploring the brush along our dirt road, relishing the pungent scent of their blossoms, and extracting nectar as sweet as southern iced tea from their pistils. • Eastern Tiger Swallowtail Butterfly: Soaring above, this butterfly symbolizes the quest for the same sweet satisfaction found in the honeysuckle. • Carolina Jasmine Blossom: Layered into the abstract background, it adds another regional touch. • Carolina Wren: A vintage Audubon illustration of this bird, perched on the rings of a cut Loblolly Pine, pays homage to the area's lumber industry. To unify the piece, I overlaid a postmark stamp, symbolizing a love letter to the region. This design embraces nostalgia for the past while celebrating the vibrant present and pays homage to the building’s history as the town post office. Digital Rendering Here are some examples of similar past projects. Dulaney Plaza - Towson, Maryland Digital Rendering Final Mural From it Sprung the Commonwealth – Worcester, MA Digital Rendering Final Mural Dream of the Arboreal Ursine – Newton, NC Digital Rendering Final Mural  STAFF REPORT BAR Meeting August 6th, 2024 To: Town of Summerville BAR From: Remy Clark, Planner II Date: 8/27/2024 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: TAYLOR COASTAL CONSTRUCTION, INC – MICHAEL TAYLOR SIGNS ASAP – LAURA MEEHAN Owner: DAY1 PROPERTIES LLC Requested Action: Final Approval Existing Zoning/Land Use: N-MX, existing commercial building Location: 800 S Main St Rating: 4 - Supportive Proposed Alterations: Request for approval for installation of light fixtures and request for exception for wall signage Guideline Citation: 5.15 GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES Guideline 78. Sign Placement Guideline 80. Lighting UDO 10.4.3B WALL SIGNS Evaluation: Proposed lighting would utilize same fixtures as existing lighting on building. Proposed signage requires an exception be granted by the BAR allowing the signage to exceed 50% of the façade width (UDO 10.4.3B). Signage as proposed is 80% of façade width.  STAFF REPORT BAR Meeting August 6th, 2024 To: Town of Summerville BAR From: Remy Clark, Planner II Date: 8/27/2024 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: ROCHELLE SCHOFIELD Owner: ROCHELLE SCHOFIELD Requested Action: Final Approval Existing Zoning/Land Use: GR-5, existing residence Location: 305 Beaufort St Rating: N/A (No Rating) Proposed Alterations: Request for approval after the fact for renovated front porch and railing Guideline Citation: 5.14 GUIDELINES FOR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES Guideline 59 – 61 Evaluation: Renovation to porch and railing completed prior to BAR review. Property is located at the edge of the Historic District boundary. This project does not appear to meet general guidelines as outlined in section 5.14, guidelines 59-61 of the Historic District Guidelines. The completed renovation is not typical of a porch in the Historic District.