Muyni
← Back to Sunnyvale

City Council

Regular Meeting

Sunnyvale, CA · March 3, 2015

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

City of Sunnyvale Meeting Minutes City Council Tuesday, March 3, 2015 4:30 PM West Conference Room and Council Chambers, City Hall, 456 W. Olive Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94086 Special Meetings-Closed Session 4:30 PM | Study Sessions 6 PM and 7:30 PM 6 P.M. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING (Study Session) 1 Call to Order in the Council Chambers (Open to the Public) Mayor Jim Griffith called the Study Session to order at 6 p.m. 2 Roll Call Present: 7 - Mayor Jim Griffith Vice Mayor Tara Martin-Milius Councilmember David Whittum Councilmember Pat Meyering Councilmember Jim Davis Councilmember Glenn Hendricks Councilmember Gustav Larsson 4 Study Session 15-0110 Discussion of General Plan Amendment, Proposed Watt Companies Project and Sense of Place Plan in East Sunnyvale ITR Area Study Session Summary: Director of Community Development Hanson Hom provided a slide presentation on the subject, including a brief background, General Plan policies, fiscal analysis, project details, EIR status, hazardous materials mitigation, traffic analysis, park dedication, Sense of Place plan, outreach efforts, and project schedule. Questions and comments were provided by Council. -Staff should clarify why a four-acre park could not be studied or accepted for the site. -How are school impacts to be studied? -Would the private park be publically accessible and what facilities could be accessed? Staff affirmed that the park area would be accessible to the public but it City of Sunnyvale Page 1 City Council Meeting Minutes March 3, 2015 was yet to be determined what facilities within this area would be available for general public use. -How would the proposed park interface with Swegles Park? Staff noted wider sidewalks at this location, and the design would be complementary. -Attention could be given to the height of the new development with respect to nearby single family development. -Provide information regarding mitigation and monitoring of vapor issues at a particular location, including individual residences.. -Historical use of gas station at the corner parcel was discussed. -The proposed green bike lanes and cost of long-term maintenance were raised. -Why would the Sense of Place fees be higher than previous fees and would the fees be a fair share? -Concerns were noted regarding prolonging the condition of the existing vacant buildings. -The amount of parkland is inadequate and that this could be an opportunity to get a larger park. -Connection to Fair Oaks Park and East Channel Trail is desired. -Will there be a stoplight at E. Duane Avenue and San Miguel Avenue? Staff noted that this is being analyzed. -Would existing development pay SOP fees? Staff noted that they had already paid a fee, and it was not possible to collect any additional fees. -Would this be the first project to use tandem parking under the new ordinance? -Policies for park standards need to be studied first before determining appropriateness of park dedication. -Ideally, the park would be situated toward the southeast corner (opposite of Swegles Park. Conversely, it was also stated that the location could be selected to better serve the San Miguel neighborhood. -Clarification of the minimum allowable density was requested. Staff confirmed that the project at 18.4 d.u./acre is slightly over the policy that recommends 75% of the allowable density. -Is there parking proposed for the public park? Staff responded that this will be considered but it is unlikely given the size of the park. -Clarified the design is for “attached” townhouses. -Questions why most developers decide to pay the fee, rather than provide parkland, given that the rate is intended to be set as a 50-50 proposition. -This area is considered a high priority area for a park. 3 Public Comment Members of the public (including three Planning Commissioners) offered the following comments: -Attention should be given to lighting design in the Sense of Place Plan -If parking is needed for the park, it should not be along E. Duane Ave. City of Sunnyvale Page 2 City Council Meeting Minutes March 3, 2015 -Roundabouts should be considered as a way to improve safety. -An emphasis on the preservation of mature trees should be included in the Sense of Place Plan. -The heights of buildings along E. Duane Ave. are critical and should maintain the character of the surrounding neighborhood. -Slides describing unsafe conditions along E. Duane Avenue were presented with commentary on the desire to eliminate parking along E. Duane, especially along the north side. -Max Frank, project applicant (Watt), noted that earlier designs included a larger park; however direction was given early on that such a design would not be supported, due to existing park standards. A question to the applicant included the amount of building area of the current site and breakdown of office and manufacturing area. A response was that the existing facility was split approximately 50-50 amongst these uses. Clarification was also provided regarding the adequacy of fire access in the new proposal. The applicant explained the responsibility of AMD for the cleanup and the purpose/process of the PPA (Prospective Purchaser Agreement). The applicant further clarified that the BMR units would likely have a price point of approximately 350K. 5 Adjourn Special Meeting Mayor Griffith adjourned the meeting at 7:35 p.m. 7:30 P.M. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING (Study Session) 1 Call to Order in the Council Chambers (Open to the Public) Mayor Griffith called the meeting to order at 7:45 p.m. 2 Roll Call Present: 7 - Mayor Jim Griffith Vice Mayor Tara Martin-Milius Councilmember David Whittum Councilmember Pat Meyering Councilmember Jim Davis Councilmember Glenn Hendricks Councilmember Gustav Larsson 3 Public Comment Several members of the public asked questions and commented: -Shelter closing triggered an experiment in which 38 people are currently being sheltered in motels. City of Sunnyvale Page 3 City Council Meeting Minutes March 3, 2015 -With the regional focus on chronic homelessness, the community has lost its focus on homelessness prevention, and more non-chronic households have recently become homeless. -Rent control should be considered. -Working in Sunnyvale has been very refreshing compared to working in Palo Alto or San Jose. -Most people who were camping in Fair Oaks Park have been sheltered through new cold weather shelter programs. -MidPen will start leasing of the new permanent supportive housing units at the old Armory site in about six months, with occupancy to begin in 2016. -Housing developers are eager to build, if money is available for dedicated homeless units (permanent supportive housing units). If the money is there, they will build it. 4 Study Session 15-0122 Update on Cold Weather Shelter Programs and the Community Plan to End Homelessness, presented by the County Office of Supportive Housing and Destination: Home Study Session Summary: Ky Le presented a brief slide show with information from the 2013 Homeless Census and Survey and on County efforts to address homelessness using five distinct program types: permanent supportive housing, rapid re-housing, prevention, emergency shelter, and transitional housing. He also provided an overview of the new Inclement Weather Program implemented during the current (FY 14-15) cold weather season, and the new North County Shelter programs developed using $1 million allocated by the County in October to address closure of the Sunnyvale emergency shelter site. He indicated that the prior Sunnyvale site had a capacity to provide a maximum of 15,000 person-shelter-days (PSDs), so the new County funding was designed to replace that capacity in various other existing shelter facilities with excess space (unfunded capacity), and through new motel voucher programs. He also provided data on utilization rates during the first two months of operation of the new North County programs, and on the next steps the County was pursuing to develop programs for the coming year, including establishing warming centers, transitional or emergency housing facilities within each city in the North County area. Councilmembers asked questions and discussed with County and City staff the following items: City of Sunnyvale Page 4 City Council Meeting Minutes March 3, 2015 -What happens at the end of the cold weather season? -Is the County advocating at the federal level for more CDBG or other funding for shelters/homeless programs? -What conversation does the County want to restart? -Does the County have a plan for providing 7,600 permanent housing units? -What does the County have in mind regarding jointly funded programs? Is the County asking the City to provide funding for something specific? -The County has set a goal of having one or more new shelter facilities in place by December 1, 2015. What are the key milestones required for the County to meet that goal? -What kind of amenities would a new shelter provide (showers, bathrooms, etc.)? -The County wanted to transition from shelters to permanent housing, based on a study prepared some years ago, correct? -What different types of clients were served at the old Armory site, compared to the clients served with the new programs this year (i.e., families vs. individuals, etc.)? -What types of services were provided at the old Armory site, compared to what services will be provided at the new permanent supportive housing projects being developed now at that site? -What was the County’s total annual cost of operating the old Armory site? How much funding did the City provide for that? -How much is the City projected to receive in Housing Mitigation fee revenues this year? Can that money be used to fund a shelter? -Is the Hedding Street Armory in San Jose, near the County offices, still available? Can it be used as an interim shelter? -Will the new supportive housing units at the Armory site be credited toward the goal of replacing the 125 shelter beds (15,000 PSD’s) formerly provided in the shelter? -Is the homeless population growing or staying the same? -Are we doing anything like what they are doing in Utah (“housing first” model)? -When is the next follow-up discussion on this topic scheduled? Should be before December 1. -What is the most cost-effective use of shelter dollars? Appears to be motel vouchers, due to multiple occupants per room. -The Council controls local zoning in the City, so if that is a problem with a site that would otherwise be a good opportunity, the County should contact the City to see if it could possibly be addressed. -What else can the City do to help with solutions? Amanda Montez of Destination:Home provided a brief slide presentation on the new Community Plan to End Homelessness. She explained that Destination:Home (D:H) is an organization that developed as a result of the County’s Blue Ribbon City of Sunnyvale Page 5 City Council Meeting Minutes March 3, 2015 Commission to End Homelessness, convened in 2005. Its board of directors is unique, with members with diverse perspectives, such as formerly homeless people, venture capital representatives, housing developers, water district officials, and various others. D:H believes that the Housing First model can make the biggest difference in addressing homelessness. There are currently about 2,500 chronically homeless individuals in the county, plus about 3,000 people in families, and 700 veterans. She noted that the agency fell a bit short of meeting the goal of housing one thousand homeless individuals or families last year due to the lack of available affordable housing within the county. The new Community Plan to End Homelessness includes three key strategies, and focuses on the belief that housing is the best medicine for ending homelessness. The plan includes a goal of creating 6,000 new “housing opportunities”. Councilmembers asked questions and commented on the presentation by Ms. Montez: -How many of the 6,000 units/opportunities will be in Sunnyvale? -What additional policies could the City adopt to help with these goals? -Can they share a copy of the plan? -D:H should provide a broad-based communications/outreach campaign to educate the general public on these issues. 5 Adjourn Special Meeting Mayor Griffith adjourned the meeting at 9:44 p.m. City of Sunnyvale Page 6

Agenda

City of Sunnyvale Notice and Agenda - Revised City Council Tuesday, March 3, 2015 4:30 PM West Conference Room and Council Chambers, City Hall, 456 W. Olive Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94086 Special Meetings-Closed Session 4:30 PM | Study Sessions 6 PM and 7:30 PM (correction to reflect start time of 7:30 p.m. for second study session, consistent with page 2 of the agenda) 4:30 P.M. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING (Closed Session) 1 Call to Order in the West Conference Room 2 Roll Call 3 Public Comment The public may provide comments regarding the Closed Session item(s) just prior to the Council beginning the Closed Session. Closed Sessions are not open to the public. 4 Convene to Closed Session 15-0146 Closed Session held pursuant to California Government Code Section 54957.6: CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Teri Silva, Director of Human Resources; Deanna J. Santana, City Manager Employee organization: Communication Officers Association (COA) Employee organization: Public Safety Managers Association (PSMA) Employee organization: Public Safety Officers Association (PSOA) Employee organization: Sunnyvale Employees Association (SEA) Employee organization: Sunnyvale Managers Association (SMA) City of Sunnyvale Page 1 Printed on 3/2/2015 City Council Notice and Agenda - Revised March 3, 2015 5 Adjourn Special Meeting 6 P.M. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING (Study Session) 1 Call to Order in the Council Chambers (Open to the Public) 2 Roll Call 3 Public Comment 4 Study Session 15-0110 Discussion of General Plan Amendment, Proposed Watt Companies Project and Sense of Place Plan in East Sunnyvale ITR Area 5 Adjourn Special Meeting 7:30 P.M. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING (Study Session) 1 Call to Order in the Council Chambers (Open to the Public) 2 Roll Call 3 Public Comment 4 Study Session 15-0122 Update on Cold Weather Shelter Programs and the Community Plan to End Homelessness, presented by the County Office of Supportive Housing and Destination: Home 5 Adjourn Special Meeting City of Sunnyvale Page 2 Printed on 3/2/2015 City Council Notice and Agenda - Revised March 3, 2015 NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda reports to council (RTCs) may be viewed on the City’s Web site at sunnyvale.ca.gov after 7 p.m. on Thursdays or at the Sunnyvale Public Library, 665 W. Olive Ave. as of Fridays prior to Tuesday City Council meetings. Any agenda related writings or documents distributed to members of the City of Sunnyvale City Council regarding any open session item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the Office of the City Clerk located at 603 All America Way, Sunnyvale, California during normal business hours and in the Council Chamber on the evening of the Council Meeting, pursuant to Government Code §54957.5. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (408) 730-7483 for specific questions regarding the agenda. Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance in this meeting, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (408) 730-7483. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 35.106 ADA Title II). City of Sunnyvale Page 3 Printed on 3/2/2015

Get email alerts for Sunnyvale

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting