Muyni
← Back to Sunnyvale

Planning Commission

Regular Meeting

Sunnyvale, CA · September 22, 2014

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

City of Sunnyvale Meeting Minutes - Final Planning Commission Monday, September 22, 2014 7:00 PM Council Chambers and West Conference Room, City Hall, 456 W. Olive Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94086 7:00 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION - STUDY SESSION - WEST CONFERENCE ROOM 1 14-0888 File #: 2014-7488 Location: 1101 Elko Dr. (APN: 104-33-010): Zoning: M-S (Industrial and Service) Zoning District Proposed Project: USE PERMIT to allow a 51-room hotel in the MS zoning district; and VARIANCE from front yard setback requirements. Applicant / Owner: Hiten Surat / Stay Cal Hotels Environmental Review: Mitigated Negative Declaration Staff Contact: Momoko Ishijima, 408-730-7532, mishijima@sunnyvale.ca.gov 2 Public Comment on Study Session Agenda Items 3 Comments from the Chair 4 Adjourn Study Session 8:00 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION - PUBLIC HEARING - COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER Chair Melton called the meeting to order at 8:00 p.m. SALUTE TO THE FLAG Chair Melton led the salute to the flag. ROLL CALL City of Sunnyvale Page 1 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final September 22, 2014 Present: 7 - Chair Russell Melton Vice Chair Ken Olevson Commissioner Ralph Durham Commissioner Sue Harrison Commissioner Larry Klein Commissioner Ken Rheaume Commissioner David Simons PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS/PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CONSENT CALENDAR 1.A 14-0890 Approval of the Draft Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of September 8, 2014 Comm. Durham moved to approve the draft minutes. Vice Chair Olevson seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Yes: 7 - Chair Melton Vice Chair Olevson Commissioner Durham Commissioner Harrison Commissioner Klein Commissioner Rheaume Commissioner Simons No: 0 PUBLIC HEARINGS/GENERAL BUSINESS City of Sunnyvale Page 2 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final September 22, 2014 2 14-0934 SUBJECT Introduce an ordinance to amend the Title 19 (Zoning) to include floor area ratio threshold standards for multi-family residential zoned property; Approve amendments to the City-wide Design Guidelines to include design techniques for multi-family residential projects that exceed the floor area ratio threshold; and make a finding that the proposed project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15061(b)(3). (Study Issue) Staff Contact: Andrew Miner, (408) 730-7707, aminer@sunnyvale.ca.gov Note: This item has been rescheduled to, and will be re-advertised for the Planning Commission meeting of November 24, 2014. No action is required. Trudi Ryan, Planning Officer, explained that this item is on this agenda because it was originally advertised for this date, but that it will be readvertised for November 24, 2014. City of Sunnyvale Page 3 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final September 22, 2014 3 14-0864 File #: 2014-7484 Location: 813 Ladis Court (APN: 213-22-054) Zoning: R-0 Low Density Residential Proposed Project: For a first and second-story and basement addition of 1,998 square feet to an existing one-story single family home resulting in 3,990 square feet (3,544 square feet living area and 446 square feet garage) and 37.5% Floor Area Ratio. Applicant / Owner: LPMD Architects (applicant) / Otto Lee (owner) Environmental Review: A Class 1 Categorical Exemption relieves this project from California Environmental Quality Act provisions and City Guidelines. Project Planner: Elise Lieberman, (408) 730-7443, elieberman@sunnyvale.ca.gov Trudi Ryan, Planning Officer, presented the staff report. Comm. Simons and Ms. Ryan discussed whether basements are included in the calculation of the Floor Area Ratio (FAR). Comm. Klein discussed with Ms. Ryan the provision of wells to let light into the basement. Chair Melton opened the public hearing. Otto Lee, the property owner, gave a presentation on the proposed project. Comm. Klein discussed with Anthony Ho, the project architect, the locations of the light wells and a ladder for egress in the basement. In response to Comm. Simons' earlier question, Ms. Ryan said that the plans demonstrate that the 800 square foot basement is not included in the FAR. Chair Melton closed the public hearing. Comm. Klein moved Alternative 1 to approve the Design Review with the recommended findings and conditions. Comm. Harrison seconded. Comm. Klein said he is happy to see that this project proposes nothing outside of the zoning rules of the City and that the applicant has communicated with the neighbors to ensure they are on board and that the affects to the community are as minimal as possible. He said he likes that egress has been added to the basement City of Sunnyvale Page 4 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final September 22, 2014 and likes the design, which is a good use of the space, and of which many homes do not often take advantage. Comm. Harrison said it is smart to have bought a large lot, and that she appreciates that the bedrooms are placed inward toward the yard so that attention is paid to repsecting the privacy of neighbors. She said it is a wonderfully useable space with a very economical plan, and that oftentimes there are many roof and structural changes that add costs, but that this project allows the economic use of the lot. Comm. Durham said he will be supporting the motion, and likes the way the second floor is set back into the lot and will not add a lot of mass. He said the mass of the west side of the building will be mitigated by the fact that the other houses are radiating away from it and the single wall will not seem as big. Comm. Simons said he will be supporting the motion and that he always likes when an applicant has worked out their expansion projects so there are no variances and the design guidelines are met. He said adding the space in the basement is a great way of expanding the size of the house without adding bulk to the exterior. Vice Chair Olevson said he will be supporting the motion and can make all of the suggested findings as meeting the design criteria for the City of Sunnyvale. He said driving around the neighborhood to see how it might fit and comparing it with the design drawings, he thinks the mass of this add-on will be minimal. Chair Melton said he will be supporting the motion and can make the findings. He said this is one of the design reviews that comes to the Planning Commission because the project is over a certain size in terms of square feet or FAR, and because of what former Planning Commissioner Brandon Sulser called the "anti-monster home" ordinance. He added that it is important for the Planning Commission to review the project and make sure it will fit into the neighborhood, and that what he sees is a beautiful house adding a nice capital injection into the neighborhood. He said the project got a lot of neighbor support and commends the applicant for talking to the neighbors and making sure everyone is on board. He said this is a great design that respects the privacy of all neighbors, and that it is nice to see a project with no variances requested. The motion carried by the following vote: City of Sunnyvale Page 5 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final September 22, 2014 Yes: 7 - Chair Melton Vice Chair Olevson Commissioner Durham Commissioner Harrison Commissioner Klein Commissioner Rheaume Commissioner Simons No: 0 City of Sunnyvale Page 6 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final September 22, 2014 4 14-0834 File#: 2013-7525 Name: Landbank Central & Wolfe Campus Location: Southeast corner of N. Wolfe Road and E. Arques Avenue (APNs: 205-33-002, 205-33-005, 205-33-007, 205-33-009, 205-33-010, 205-33-011, 205-33-012, 205-33-013, and 205-33-014) Proposed Project: Consideration of applications for a 17.84 acre site (previous consideration on August 25, 2014 failed to receive required four votes): REZONING to change the zone from M-S to M-S/FAR 100%; DESIGN REVIEW to allow the development of a 777,100 square foot, six story office complex and associated parking and onsite amenities; VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP to consolidate the existing lots and street into a condominium subdivision, including the abandonment of Santa Ana Court; and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT between the City of Sunnyvale and Landbank Investments, LLC. Applicant/Owner: Scott Jacobs, Landbank Investments, LLC Environmental Review: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (the EIR was recommended for certification by the Planning Commission on August 25, 2014) Staff Contact: David Hogan, 408-730-7440, dhogan@sunnyvale.ca.gov Kathryn Berry, Senior Assistant City Attorney, provided a summary of the previous consideration of this item at the Planning Commission meeting of August 25, and the reason it must be reconsidered at this meeting. David Hogan, the project planner, presented the staff report and discussed the changes made to the staff report since its previous consideration. Comm. Simons verified the width of the sidewalks with Manuel Pineda, Director of the Public Works Department. Comm. Simons discussed with Mr. Hogan Condition of Approval (COA) BP-20 which requires examination of the site for bat colonies, and confirmed that although the proposed Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is 100%, the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program would be reduced to a 70% FAR level. Comm. Simons also confirmed with Trudi Ryan, Planning Officer, that converting parking spaces to storage for bicycles is acceptable if needed in the future to support a TDM program, and confirmed with staff the allowed locations of onsite electrical service utility vaults. Comm. Harrison confirmed with Mr. Hogan that should the project not start within City of Sunnyvale Page 7 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final September 22, 2014 three years, the Development Agreement would extend the life of any entitlements for the duration of the agreement, and Mr. Hogan clarified the annual escalation of fees for constructing required public improvements. Comm. Harrison also confirmed with Mr. Hogan that reclaimed water is currently in north Wolfe. Comm. Klein discussed with Ms. Ryan the height limitation difference between a rezone and a use permit. Comm. Klein confirmed with Mr. Hogan that the lack of an Alternative to deny the rezone was merely an oversight, and discussed with Ms. Ryan the penalties for non-compliance with the TDM program. Comm. Klein confirmed with Mr. Pineda which turn lanes would require improvements and potential right-of-way acquisition from adjacent property owners. Comm. Klein discussed with Mr. Hogan the proposed terra cotta baguette screen around the parking garage. Vice Chair Olevson and Mr. Pineda discussed the interaction of vehicles exiting the proposed project and current roadway striping, and discussed the distance between the westernmost exit and the nearby intersection.Vice Chair Olevson clarified with staff the purpose of creating four condominium lots, and also clarified with Ms. Ryan that the project is required to have no more traffic than a project with 70% FAR. Comm. Durham confirmed with Mr. Hogan that the project's TDM program is not built around the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's (BAAQMD) new standards for TDM programs. Comm. Durham discussed with Mr. Pineda allowing additional capacity for left turns from southbound Wolfe onto eastbound Central. Comm. Harrison confirmed with Mr. Pineda that the project would be required to widen the off-ramps from Central onto Wolfe, that the County is supportive of the conceptual plans for this improvement and that the developer's engineer is responsible for obtaining the County permit. Comm. Harrison also confirmed with Mr. Pineda that the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) agreed with the rationale for relocating the bus shelter, and discussed with Ms. Ryan tenant options for providing shuttles to CalTrain stations. Comm. Harrison discussed with Mr. Pineda potential traffic improvements that would make access to, and use of, Central Expressway easier. Vice Chair Olevson clarified with Ms. Ryan that annual review of the Development Agreement for compliance would not revisit the terms, but would just ensure they are being observed. Comm. Simons and Ms. Ryan discussed the allowable and expected signage of the City of Sunnyvale Page 8 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final September 22, 2014 building. Chair Melton opened the public hearing. Scott Jacobs, CEO of Landbank Investments, provided information about, and presented illustrations of, the proposed project. Vice Chair Olevson confirmed with Mr. Jacobs that rooftop gardens and solar panels are included in the project, and that because a tenant has not yet been determined, means to reach a TDM program goal of 70% FAR have not been finalized. Vice Chair Olevson confirmed with Ryan Bernal, with BKF, that increased exit widths will be integrated into the base plan for construction. Comm. Klein discussed the design of the parking structure with Paul Woolford, with HOK, and discussed with Mr. Jacobs the cost and possibility of the construction of underground parking. Comm. Simons confirmed with Mr. Jacobs that there is no finalized tenant signage plan, and discussed with Kathy Doi, with HOK, the art program planned for the site. Comm. Simons and Mr. Hogan discussed the mitigation measure requiring the survey of the site for bat colonies, and discussed with Ms. Ryan the zoning code requirement that any project exceeding 70% FAR must have a 70% FAR TDM program. Comm. Harrison asked if onsite amenities would be accessible to off-campus people, to which Mr. Jacobs responded that it is dependent on the tenant. Comm. Harrison and Mr. Woolford discussed potential for additional pedestrian access from the edge of the proposed campus into the center and discussed with Ms. Ryan the projected housing mitigation funds coming from the project. Comm. Rheaume confirmed with Mr. Jacobs that several offsite gaps in sidewalks and bike paths would be closed via project improvements, and that these improvements are in required in the COAs. Holly Lofgren, a Sunnyvale resident, expressed her concerns about the project, and said that she opposes it. Otto Lee, a Sunnyvale resident, discussed his support for the project, and added that he is also concerned about the potential increase in traffic. In response to an earlier question, Ms. Ryan clarified the means for measuring City of Sunnyvale Page 9 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final September 22, 2014 building heights. Mr. Jacobs read from letters of those who support the project and reiterated the contributions the project would make to City programs. Chair Melton closed the public hearing. Comm. Harrison and Ms. Ryan discussed penalties for non-compliance with TDM programs. Comm. Klein and Ms. Ryan discussed the location of other properties within the City that are zoned M-S/100% FAR. Comm. Durham discussed with Mr. Pineda the potential routes of traffic exiting the project to get onto Central Expressway. Comm. Rheaume moved to recommend to City Council Alternative 1 to Introduce an Ordinance to Rezone the property to M-S/100%FAR; Approve the Design Review and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map with Conditions of Approval in Attachment 4; and Introduce an Ordinance Approving a Development Agreement. Comm. Simons seconded. Comm. Rheaume said this is a beautiful and innovative design that will hopefully raise the bar on other commercial developments in the City, and that he also has concerns about the added traffic. He said younger generations are on their bikes, while older generations are used to being in their cars and he struggles with not seeing beyond the car. He said this area is close enough to the CalTrain stations and he would love to have very clear bike paths to each station, but that he also has confidence in staff, the applicant and whoever will lease out the buildings that a comprehensive TDM plan will be put in place. He said if employees cannot get to work the tenant will need to address that. Comm. Simons offered a friendly amendment to add to COA BP-40 that, if it is needed in the future, vehicle parking can be replaced with additional secure bicycle parking, subject to approval of the Director of Community Development Comm. Rheaume accepted. Comm. Simons recommend the applicant consider non-uniform, or motion, designs for the parking garage. City of Sunnyvale Page 10 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final September 22, 2014 Comm. Rheaume accepted. Comm. Simons recommend the applicant consider integrating the required art into the building. Comm. Rheaume accepted. Comm. Simons offered a friendly amendment to increase the Transportation Demand Management program to 35%. Staff requested time to discuss this amendment. Comm. Simons said the landscape plan for this project is the most intelligent one he has seen for a large development in Sunnyvale, and that oftentimes projects this size have international designers and developers come into the City to remake other cities and end up planting landscaping that does not grow in Sunnyvale. He noted that one project in particular planted trees costing over $50,000 each and all 20 plus died. He said the landscaping may be there perhaps even longer than the building. He said his request for a greater TDM program is due to the extreme change in use at this site and the expectation that the project will intensify this spot and create a higher level of demand for transportation in this area. He said Wolfe is already highly impacted and it would be a benefit to the developer to work toward a higher TDM. He said he can support the motion with amendments easily, and that the project will be a desirable business site. Ms. Ryan explained that if the Planning Commission recommends a higher TDM, it is better to recommend to City Council incorporating the increase in the Development Agreement, and not as a COA. Comm. Simons said he would like to make this recommendation his friendly amendment, and Comm. Rheaume accepted. Comm. Harrison said she will be supporting the motion, and appreciates that this is an energy and water efficient project that is beautiful and has unique architecture. She said she also appreciates that it is well thought through in terms of the amenities, parking and materials, and that her only concern is traffic. She said that she is confident that we can work it out with the assurances of staff that they, the County and the applicant can figure out single vehicle access and that the Transportation Impact Fees can fund needed improvements. She said she is also confident that traffic will be worked out if the TDM program reduces City of Sunnyvale Page 11 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final September 22, 2014 single-occupant vehicle trips, and that this project is designed for tenants who want to employ millenials who, per the TDM manager of LinkedIn, don’t drive, and will become three-quarters of the work force in the next ten years Comm. Klein offered a friendly amendment to reexamine the color and exterior design of the parking structure to be reviewed by the Director of Community Development. Comms. Rheaume and Simons accepted. Comm. Klein recommended that City Council remove the appropriate square footage from the Development Pool. Comms. Rheaume and Simons accepted. Comm. Klein said what he likes about the project are the LEED platinum building, the aesthetics, the open space increase, the fees that will be paid to the City, the increased TDM levels and the help that it will be to the economy, but that he will not be supporting the motion. He said this is a case of spot zoning to a large degree, and that there is a large percentage of single-family residential zoning to the north and south of the project. He said that all of the sites zoned 100% FAR in the City are along the Mathilda corridor, that the reasoning behind recommended approval of this project is that it is 1.4 miles from CalTrain stations, but that a 1.4 mile radius encompasses a lot of land. He said that while this project has many pluses, it would set a dangerous precedence that may allow any site somewhat close to transit to be rezoned M-S/100% FAR with the appropriate TDM plan in place. He added that traffic is already bad at the corner of Arques and Wolfe, that the left turn lanes are not fully worked out, and that as much as transportation impacts might be reduced with the TDM plan, there will still be an effect. He said that adding this heavy intensity campus on Wolfe and the heavy intensity Apple campus also along Wolfe will make this corridor a dramatically difficult area. He added that this is not the right place for this project in Sunnyvale, and that Arques is not truly an industrial, high-commercial area, which is why we have Peery and Moffett Parks. Vice Chair Olevson said he will be supporting the motion, and this his concern with this item at the previous meeting was that he did not have sufficient time to review the Development Agreement and its implication to the City, and that having done that he believes this project is a good one for the City. He said he recognizes that we are looking at a change in the zoning, that down Arques he sees a lot of high tech companies in older buildings, and this project would change the character of Sunnyvale into a high tech City. He said he appreciates that parking is out of sight, City of Sunnyvale Page 12 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final September 22, 2014 and added that the project has a nice design and has come a long way to be environmentally sound with the solar and rooftop area being added to the building. Comm. Durham said he will be supporting the motion, and that Wolfe needs more work for cyclist safety, which may mean removing some more parking for dedicated bike lanes. He noted that the bike lane ends on Wolfe where it meets with Fair Oaks and there is no way through, and that some of this may be mitigated with future channel work. He said he would like to see the possibility of prohibiting left turns from the former Santa Ana Court onto Arques as he thinks it is too close to the intersection to make the left across four lanes of traffic, especially at rush hour. He said he likes the design of the project, the solar features, open space and keeping the mature trees which will make it look like an established property from the get go. He added that he is not sure how to deal with the traffic issue and hopes the plans work. Chair Melton said he will be supporting the motion, and that while some may see this second public hearing on this project as a result of a procedural error, he views it as taking the time to get the best possible project. He said he can make the findings and is on board with doing this as a rezone because of the major policy shift. He said he appreciates that no deviations are requested, and that he sees a lot of public benefit coming from this project. With regard to the TDM change, he appreciates the staff suggestion to incorporate it into the Development Agreement. He said he also appreciates that the architectural design does not overuse glass, and thanked the members of the public for coming out to speak. MOTION: Comm. Rheaume moved to recommend that City Council Introduce an Ordinance to Rezone the property to M-S/100%FAR; Introduce an Ordinance Approving a Development Agreement; and Approve the Design Review and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map with modified Conditions of Approval: 1) Add to BP-40 that if needed in the future, replace vehicle parking with additional secure bicycle parking, subject to approval of the Director of Community Development; 2) Recommend the applicant consider non-uniform, or motion, designs for the parking garage; 3) Consider integrating the required art into the building; 4) Increase the Transportation Demand Management program to 35% in the Development Agreement; 5) Reexamine the color and exterior design of the parking structure to be reviewed by the Director of Community Development; and 6) Recommend that City Council remove the appropriate square footage from the Development Pool. City of Sunnyvale Page 13 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Final September 22, 2014 Comm. Simons seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Yes: 6 - Chair Melton Vice Chair Olevson Commissioner Durham Commissioner Harrison Commissioner Rheaume Commissioner Simons No: 1 - Commissioner Klein 5 14-0889 Standing Item: Potential Study Issues for 2015 No potential study issues for 2015 were discussed. NON-AGENDA ITEMS AND COMMENTS -Commissioner Comments None. -Staff Comments Ms. Ryan discussed upcoming items to, and those recently heard by, the City Council. INFORMATION ONLY ITEMS None. ADJOURNMENT With no further business Chair Melton adjourned the meeting at 10:40 p.m. City of Sunnyvale Page 14

Agenda

City of Sunnyvale Notice and Agenda - Final Planning Commission Monday, September 22, 2014 7:00 PM Council Chambers and West Conference Room, City Hall, 456 W. Olive Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94086 7:00 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION - STUDY SESSION - WEST CONFERENCE ROOM 1 14-0888 File #: 2014-7488 Location: 1101 Elko Dr. (APN: 104-33-010): Zoning: M-S (Industrial and Service) Zoning District Proposed Project: USE PERMIT to allow a 51-room hotel in the MS zoning district; and VARIANCE from front yard setback requirements. Applicant / Owner: Hiten Surat / Stay Cal Hotels Environmental Review: Mitigated Negative Declaration Staff Contact: Momoko Ishijima, 408-730-7532, mishijima@sunnyvale.ca.gov 2 Public Comment on Study Session Agenda Items 3 Comments from the Chair 4 Adjourn Study Session Any agenda related writings or documents distributed to members of the Planning Commission regarding any open session item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the Planning Division office located at 456 W. Olive Ave., Sunnyvale CA 94086 during normal business hours, and in the Council Chambers on the evening of the Planning Commission meeting pursuant to Government Code §54957.5. 8:00 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION - PUBLIC HEARING - COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER SALUTE TO THE FLAG ROLL CALL City of Sunnyvale Page 1 Printed on 9/23/2014 Planning Commission Notice and Agenda - Final September 22, 2014 PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS/PUBLIC COMMENTS Speakers are limited to 3 minutes for announcements of related commission events, programs, resignations, recognitions, acknowledgments. The Public Comments category is limited to 15 minutes, with a maximum of three minutes per speaker. If you wish to address the board or commission, please complete a speaker card and give it to the Recording Secretary or you may orally make a request to speak. If your subject is not on the agenda, you will be recognized at this time; but the Brown Act (Open Meeting Law) does not allow action by board or commission members. If you wish to speak to a subject listed on the agenda, you will be recognized at the time the item is being considered by the board or commission. CONSENT CALENDAR 1.A 14-0890 Approval of the Draft Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of September 8, 2014 PUBLIC HEARINGS/GENERAL BUSINESS 2 14-0934 SUBJECT Introduce an ordinance to amend the Title 19 (Zoning) to include floor area ratio threshold standards for multi-family residential zoned property; Approve amendments to the City-wide Design Guidelines to include design techniques for multi-family residential projects that exceed the floor area ratio threshold; and make a finding that the proposed project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15061(b)(3). (Study Issue) Staff Contact: Andrew Miner, (408) 730-7707, aminer@sunnyvale.ca.gov Note: This item has been rescheduled to, and will be re-advertised for the Planning Commission meeting of November 24, 2014. No action is required. City of Sunnyvale Page 2 Printed on 9/23/2014 Planning Commission Notice and Agenda - Final September 22, 2014 3 14-0864 File #: 2014-7484 Location: 813 Ladis Court (APN: 213-22-054) Zoning: R-0 Low Density Residential Proposed Project: For a first and second-story and basement addition of 1,998 square feet to an existing one-story single family home resulting in 3,990 square feet (3,544 square feet living area and 446 square feet garage) and 37.5% Floor Area Ratio. Applicant / Owner: LPMD Architects (applicant) / Otto Lee (owner) Environmental Review: A Class 1 Categorical Exemption relieves this project from California Environmental Quality Act provisions and City Guidelines. Project Planner: Elise Lieberman, (408) 730-7443, elieberman@sunnyvale.ca.gov 4 14-0834 File#: 2013-7525 Name: Landbank Central & Wolfe Campus Location: Southeast corner of N. Wolfe Road and E. Arques Avenue (APNs: 205-33-002, 205-33-005, 205-33-007, 205-33-009, 205-33-010, 205-33-011, 205-33-012, 205-33-013, and 205-33-014) Proposed Project: Consideration of applications for a 17.84 acre site (previous consideration on August 25, 2014 failed to receive required four votes): REZONING to change the zone from M-S to M-S/FAR 100%; DESIGN REVIEW to allow the development of a 777,100 square foot, six story office complex and associated parking and onsite amenities; VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP to consolidate the existing lots and street into a condominium subdivision, including the abandonment of Santa Ana Court; and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT between the City of Sunnyvale and Landbank Investments, LLC. Applicant/Owner: Scott Jacobs, Landbank Investments, LLC Environmental Review: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (the EIR was recommended for certification by the Planning Commission on August 25, 2014) Staff Contact: David Hogan, 408-730-7440, dhogan@sunnyvale.ca.gov 5 14-0889 Standing Item: Potential Study Issues for 2015 NON-AGENDA ITEMS AND COMMENTS -Commissioner Comments City of Sunnyvale Page 3 Printed on 9/23/2014 Planning Commission Notice and Agenda - Final September 22, 2014 -Staff Comments INFORMATION ONLY ITEMS ADJOURNMENT Any agenda related writings or documents distributed to members of the Planning Commission regarding any open session item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the Planning Division office located at 456 W. Olive Ave., Sunnyvale CA 94086 during normal business hours, and in the Council Chambers on the evening of the Planning Commission meeting pursuant to Government Code §54957.5. Agenda information is available by contacting The Planning Division at (408) 730-7440. Agendas and associated reports are also available on the City’s web site at sunnyvale.ca.gov or at the Sunnyvale Public Library, 665 W. Olive Ave., Sunnyvale, 72 hours before the meeting. Planning a presentation for a Planning Commission meeting? To help you prepare and deliver your public comments, please review the "Making Public Comments During City Council or Planning Commission Meetings" document available at Presentations.inSunnyvale.com. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that if you file a lawsuit challenging any final decision on any public hearing item listed in this agenda, the issues in the lawsuit may be limited to the issues which were raised at the public hearing or presented in writing to the City at or before the public hearing. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6 imposes a 90-day deadline for the filing of any lawsuit challenging final action on an agenda item which is subject to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (408) 730-7440. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (29 CFR 35.106 ADA Title II) City of Sunnyvale Page 4 Printed on 9/23/2014

Get email alerts for Sunnyvale

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting